Is the President Above the Law? | United States v. Nixon
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 фев 2022
- I wrote a new book all about the Supreme Court. Order your copy here: amzn.to/45Wzhur or visit www.iammrbeat.com/merch.html.
In episode 64 of Supreme Court Briefs, the President of the United States, Richard Nixon, doesn't want to release some secret recordings that might implicate him in the Watergate scandal.
Music by @ElectricNeedleRoom, Mr. Beat's band: electricneedleroom.bandcamp.c...
Produced by Matt Beat. All images/video by Matt Beat, found in the public domain, or used under fair use guidelines. Subscribe to my channel @iammrbeat.
Check out cool primary sources here:
www.oyez.org/cases/1973/73-1766
Additional sources/further reading/watching:
www.law.cornell.edu/supremeco...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_...
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterga...
constitutioncenter.org/blog/a...
www.pbs.org/newshour/extra/ap...
www.crf-usa.org/images/pdf/ni...
Cameo, yo: www.cameo.com/iammrbeat?qid=1...
Buy Mr. Beat merch: matt-beat-shop.fourthwall.com/
Snail mail Mr. Beat: PO Box 1982 Lawrence, KS 66044
Donate to Mr. Beat for great perks on Patreon: / iammrbeat
Buy Mr. Beat's book, The Ultimate American Presidential Election Book: Every Presidential Election in American History (1788-2016) amzn.to/3fdakiZ
Donate to Mr. Beat on Paypal: www.paypal.me/mrbeat
More merch: www.bonfire.com/store/mr-beat/
Reddit: / mrbeat
Mr. Beat's band: electricneedleroom.us
Mr. Beat on Twitter: / beatmastermatt
Mr. Beat on Facebook: / iammrbeat
Mr. Beat on Instagram: / iammrbeat
Mr. Beat's Discord server: / discord
Mr. Beat's Tiktok: www.tiktok.com/@iammrbeat?lan...
Mr. Beat favorites:
POP! Icons: George Washington go.magik.ly/ml/11jrb/
Useful Charts: usefulcharts.com/?aff=12
Shampoo: rb.gy/vlqeym
Acne fighter: rb.gy/a6dnb0
Recommended books:
Republic, Lost by Lawrence Lessing go.magik.ly/ml/11jul/
Truman by David McCullough go.magik.ly/ml/11jwc/
Studio equipment:
Canon EOS M50 Camera EF-M 15-45mm Lens amzn.to/3dcNPen
Samtian LED Video Light Kit amzn.to/3llDwHO
TroyStudio Acoustic Panel amzn.to/33CkqHn
Blue Snowball iCE USB Mic amzn.to/2GseOHa
I use MagicLinks for all my ready-to-shop product links. Check it out here:
www.magiclinks.com/rewards/re...
FTC Disclosure: This post or video contains affiliate links, which means I may receive a commission for purchases made through my links.
#supremecourt #supremecourtbriefs #apgov
Washington, D.C.
June 17, 1972
Five men break into the Democratic National Committee headquarters in the Watergate Office Building. They tried to set up a wiretap and photograph confidential Democratic Party documents. However, the police caught them in the act and arrested them. Little did most know, these men were connected with the Committee for the Re-Election of the President, or CRP, or CREEP (hee hee), the organization directly tied to President Richard Nixon in order to help him get re-elected.
Flash forward to May 1973, and thanks to multiple ongoing investigations, now more and more Americans are thinking the Nixon administration was directly linked to the Watergate break-in.
The U.S. Senate Watergate Committee began public hearings, and the Nixon administration appointed Archibald Cox to lead a separate, independent investigation. Flash forward again to July 1973, and Americans found out that there is a new system in the White House that automatically records everything in the Oval Office and Cabinet Room. In other words, if Nixon was in on the Watergate break-in or even if he just knew about it and was trying to cover it up, there could be evidence of it in the recordings. Cox, as well as the Senate, immediately subpoenaed the White House recordings, or required that they be submitted to court as evidence. However, Nixon refused to release them, citing his “executive privilege” as the president. He even ordered Cox to drop his subpoena, and after Cox refused, Nixon had him fired. Not a good look there, Nixon.
But the investigations only picked up. In what eventually became known as The Watergate Scandal, a total of 69 people were indicted and 48 people convicted for either participating in, aiding in, or covering up information about the Watergate break-in. MANY of these folks were top Nixon administration officials. By early 1974, it seemed pretty clear that President Nixon had at least known about the Watergate break-in and tried to cover it up. However, there was little solid evidence, and Nixon had still refused to give up the recordings.
My book about everything you need to know about the Supreme Court is now available!
Amazon: amzn.to/3Jj3ZnS
Bookshop (a collection of indie publishers): bookshop.org/books/the-power-of-and-frustration-with-our-supreme-court-100-supreme-court-cases-you-should-know-about-with-mr-beat/9781684810680
Barnes and Noble: www.barnesandnoble.com/w/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-matt-beat/1142323504?ean=9781684810680
Amazon UK: www.amazon.co.uk/s?k=the+power+of+our+supreme+court&crid=3R59T7TQ6WKI3&sprefix=the+power+of+our+supreme+courth%2Caps%2C381&ref=nb_sb_noss
Mango: mango.bz/books/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-2523-b
Target: www.target.com/p/the-power-of-our-supreme-court-by-matt-beat-paperback/-/A-86273023
Walmart: www.walmart.com/ip/The-Power-of-Our-Supreme-Court-How-the-Supreme-Court-Cases-Shape-Democracy-Paperback-9781684810680/688487495
Chapters Indigo: www.chapters.indigo.ca/en-ca/books/the-power-of-our-supreme/9781684810680-item.html?ikwid=The+Power+of+Our+Supreme+Court&ikwsec=Home&ikwidx=0#algoliaQueryId=eab3e89ad34051a62471614d72966b7e
You totally left out the fact that famous long distance runner and Shrimp restaurant entrepreneur Forrest Gump was the one who called the cops on the guys who broke into the Watergate hotel
Don't worry, I'll bring it up in my upcoming Watergate video ;)
Yeah, and not in fact an African American securty guard.
@@shrimpfleawhy do you have to specify his race?
😀😃😅🤣
@@ash_11117 probably one of the "woke" people who think everything is racially motivated. i'm black and i dont have any issue with forrest finding the CRP people instead of a cop who happens to of negro race
This is really interesting. Since Nixon avoided impeachment and Ford pardoned him, it never occured to me that there might been other cases on Nixon involving the Watergate Scandal. But it makes sense that the Supreme Court would step in to get those tapes.
I was not around when it happened, but I think Ford pardoning Nixon was the right call, so the nation could heal. I still however think Nixon was responsible for Watergate and the man feared the election would have been stolen from him like he believed during Kennedy. If that happened, I do not know for certain, but Nixion believed that.
@@Estarfigam
Pardoning also implies an acceptance of guilt, so it could also be spun as still saying what Nixon did was wrong
And don't forget the Pentagon Papers case. The Court perhaps was biased against Nixon, tbh
@@iammrbeat
Because of when Nixon tried discrediting the whistleblower, that might have biased the Supreme Court a bit?
I mean, sure, but in either case Nixon was in the wrong, so the Court’s collective distaste for Tricky Dick was well-earned
@@iammrbeat I don't blame the court for being bias on Nixon if they were. According to Professor Dave (youtube channel), Nixon been up to shady stuff since he ran for president after Lyndon B. Johnson that would of been unconstitutional/illegal if proven. Possibly even before that. I wouldn't be surprise there were people trying to find evidence that would stick even by the constitution for a while, and when watergate scandal happen and it was discovered there was tapes, they saw it as their chance and jumped for it.
The President is a public official that we elected. I think everything he does should be held under public scrutiny for the duration that he is in office. This will put a lot of pressure on him, but that's what being a world leader entails.
I agree
Him or her*
While all US presidents have been men, that isn’t a requirement for the office.
@@davidnotonstinnett i bet an entire video that there will not be a "she" president
@@davidnotonstinnett who cares white knight. You know what Channel Name meant
Agree. There should always be transparency
nixon’s whole story as a president is always so interesting to me, this was a really good video (as usual lol)
Thank you! I plan to eventually make a video about Nixon's life, and look for a Watergate video soon!
Nixon is very in middle for me. There some things I like about him, yet there are other things that he did. Which I disliked about him.
@@iammrbeat looking forward to it!!
@@uncrazy2614 what's there to like? He's a liar and a crook and a coward.
It is truly captivating how everyday citizens of the USA felt about the scandal of Watergate, and it was truly sad for Nixon to mess up like that to win the election even if most people were gonna already vote for him (as they did in our timeline).
True
Our timeline???
@@iammrbeat it the Channelaut affair went to the public it would finished him and charged for treason. So Watergate was just the tip of the iceberg
@@DugrozReportsWake up, Dugroz.
In the UK we have a similar problem with leaders being above the law.... I can't believe its a debate if they should not be above the law! They lead a country, they have more responsibility to that country.
If leaders can break the law without inconvenience then we might as well have autocratic monarchs
I don’t think anyone thinks they should be above the law but some things relating to security are important to keep private
I think the old saying that power corrupts should be applied to any position of power. The sad thing is, they delude and fool us into giving them power.
@@MuhammadFarukh Then they pretend that they’re ‘just like us’ to get our sympathy 🤦♂️
Your monarch is above the law technically
@@nathandennis8078 hence a lot of people think we shouldn't have one
Supreme court briefs is my favorite series and I've been waiting for this one! Thank you Mr Beat!
That's amazing. Thank YOU
If you are reading this make today an amazing day and keep moving towards your goals. success comes to those who never give up.
Yeah! Always remember to set a goal in life. That’s the rule
Remember its never too early or too late to become smart with your money. Save invest, work do whatever you need to do to grow your wealth.
My mother thinks she got a great deal because she gets 0.05% in a money market account through Navy Federal, and get Fiddle Faddle buy 1 get 1 free at Aldis this work so she thinks she’s smart with her money. while I made 25% last year on 750k portfolio investing, I don’t have the heart to tell her she is clueless.
Wow that’s cool, I have been looking to start investing recently watching self-tutorialc videos on RUclips can you share some tips to start investing for newbies.
@@Antoniopedro7624 Buy stock and hold
*Pick the odd lie out*
"I'm not a crook"
"Read my lips, no new taxes"
"I did not have sexual relations with that woman"
"Nobody told me that this was something against the rules"
"All of the above"
"Read my lips, no new taxes" - Turning that statement into a lie was the best thing to do to help the economy in the early '90s, whereas the other lies were just deceitful.
Love your supreme court briefs Mr beat, I always watch them when they come out, and appreciate them even if they don't get as many views as your other videos
Thank you so much. I do enjoy making them.
Always excited for new videos, keep up great work Mr. Beat!
I live in Nashville and I’m planning on visiting Shiloh Battlefield this spring/summer. Your videos have really gotten me into history lately.
That's amazing. My friend loved the Shiloh site when he went a few years back
These trump indictment cases are gonna be interesting to see what precedent occurs
Love these supreme court briefs. I really think you do a great job explaining everything and staying unbiased.
Thank you Caleb!
@@iammrbeat amogus
This is very nice timing. I’ve got a debate project over this case, so it was helpful for me to understand it
Well good luck on your debate!
Love SCB Mr Beat, was waiting for this one! You're also the reason I got into American history and politics
That's amazing. Thank you Nicholas!
I grew up during this time. As a 10 year old, the only thing I associates with Watergate was that the hearings canceled afternoon cartoons (no Cartoon Network). Thank you for the charity almost 50 years later!
Well stay tuned for a Watergate video coming in a month or two!
@@iammrbeat 😳
Most underrated series on your channel, it is so interesting how these cases play out.
I'm glad you kept making Supreme Court Briefs!
Thank you so much for making Supreme Court Briefs. The best history teacher I’ve ever had :)
You make some of my favorite U.S history videos thank you Mr. Beat.
I appreciate the kind words and you watching!
This case regarding executive privilege is especially pertinent in 2024. At least Justice Rehnquist had the decency to recuse himself. Thanks, Mr. Beat.
Great vid. Too bad this wasn’t already out when I was working on my Watergate project in 7th grade. Love seeing your briefs!
Great video. Love your Supreme Court Briefs for covering a tough subject with objectivity and dry wit
Thank you Cameron!
I was hoping you would do this one now! Great job.
Thank you Alon!
Benn waiting for this for a long time, amazing video as always
The more and more I see this series of videos, the MORE I realize how powerful the Supreme Court is.
Sounds alot like former president Donald J Trump trying to use Executive Privilege for his own personal benefit.
Interesting! had to learn about this in my Government class!
Presidents make the law and they must follow the law. If the government won't follow the laws they make, that's authoritarian.
Well put!
Congress makes the law. Unfortunately, in modern times Congress has become more lock step sycophantic with their party's president, current or former.
@@Jakamakala yep pretty much there is no head guy its why we have 3 branches of government just without the checks and balances of past.
Love your vids, I've learnt so much about US history that I never knew about as a brit but find fascinating, keep doing you!!!
That's awesome. Thank you Corey!
This was just showed in my 12th grade US history class, and I was so excited because I already watched this channel at home!
Yes! Briefs are back in the town!
Ooooooooh I’ve been waiting for another Supreme Court Briefs. These are my favorite!!!
Glad you dig them!
@@iammrbeat Will you cover North Carolina V Alford?
I love this series so much thanks for bringing it back
Thank you, and more to come this year!
i just had a homework based on this and i don't do well with reading long passages on it so this helped so much. thanks a lot!! :)
I get a half day from school and mr beat releases a president video! I've been blessed by the heavens
President video + Supreme Court Briefs :) and thank you!
The Glorious return of the series
YES! Finally a supreme court episode. Love ’em!
Through these series i’ve learnt a whole lot about the US constitution and ammendments so i’m grateful for these series. Thanks from Sweden
@@LKS._. Well thanks for watching them!
Another video from my favorite mr beat series, thank you mr beat
Thanks buddy
Watergate tarnished Nixon’s reputation, but sometimes I wonder how he would be remembered in the present had those men never gotten caught & Nixon got to serve out his second term.
Nixon wasn't as bad as most people think he was
Thankfully, Forrest Gump dropped a dime on them.
If he never got caught, he would have had more than 2 terms
@@mrsatire9475 You mean like in the bad timeline in "Back to the Future 2"? He was even seeking to run for a 5th term!
@@Compucles In the Watchmen timeline Nixon won 5 presidential elections. But Robert Redford defeated him in 1988.
Woah. Never expected to see a former U.S. Prez on this series. Good job, Mr. Beat
Thanks, and maybe it will give it more clicks 😄
Excellent video. Thanks for sharing.
Thank YOU
Yay, new episode of Supreeeeme Court Briefs!
Thank you for doing another episode! I was worried SCB was cancelled :)
Hopefully it will never be cancelled 🙃
I love supreme court briefs! :-)
You should make a video on Nix v. Hedden, the supreme court case that determined tomatoes are legally classified as vegetables
I already made a video about Nix v. Hedden!
I know you don't get as many views for this series than your other videos. But this is certainly my favourite series.
Well thank you for watching!
I've been waiting for this.
I'm sorry to keep you waiting!
That's ok!
Hi Mr. Beat, watching from the U.K., please could you make a video explaining the President’s power to pardon, the process involved and the history behind it
The Judicial Branch can't interfere in a matter of the Executive Branch? That argument goes against the entire Constitutional system of "checks and balances."
What a great birthday present, great video!
Happy birthday!
Great story with relevant aspects today!!
We're literally learning about this in my Advanced History class. This is awesome.
I can never not look at Nixon without thinking of Futurama's version of him 😂 great video!
haha and I had to sneak that in there. Futurama is such a great show
"Yeah, sir, you might want to send a maintenance man over to that office across the way. The lights are off, and they must be looking for a fuse box, 'cause them flashlights, they're keepin me awake."
Actually justices Burger and Blackmun while agreeing with the majority on limiting executive privelege, believed that the special prosecutor lacked standing to sue Nixon. Their fear from the possibility of Nixon's defying a non-unanimous decision played a part in their vote. Steven J. Abrams further explains this 'game' in his book Game Theory And the Humanities.
One of the biggest questions that I have is how we would view the Nixon presidency if Nixon was not so paranoid and criminal. I actually like many of his policies and miss his style of conservatism, but he destroyed his legacy and the trust of the American people in the presidency for years.
Agreed, the older I get the more I think Nixon wasn't so bad after all
@@iammrbeat You ranked Nixon as the 5th worst president in American history back in 2018 and in the F tier in your presidential tier list in 2020.
Yeah, wasn't Nixon considered a very good President before Watergate? There are good reasons he was reelected in a landslide, after all. I've even heard people argue that he belongs on both lists of Best and Worst U.S. Presidents.
I think he was slightly above average but not a good person and a criminal as a republican I couldn’t stand him
Remember how he beat Humphrey in the 68' election, it was helped by a dirty job with his campaign manager Kissinger etc in ilegal talks to avoid peace in Vietnam
Do a video on the party switch next! Would love to hear your take on it.
Which Supreme Court case should I cover for this series next?
Go to www.blinkist.com/mrbeat and get 25% off of a Blinkist Premium membership.
Richard "I'm not a crook" Nixon
@@moses4769 good one!
this might be very contoversial but i would like to see a video on trump, or a video comparing denmark to some other scandinavian country.
Mahanoy Area School District v B.L, in honor of Justice Breyer
Riley v. California
Mr. Beat, you’re so close to reaching 100 million views on this channel!
Wowness! I always appreciate your support, by the way!
@@iammrbeat And I always appreciate your videos!
You should make a book on some of the supreme court cases
Thank you.
Omg, I watched All The Presidents Men for the first time a few weeks ago and was thinking you should do an episode of Supreme Court Briefs about Nixon!
How did you learn to read minds?
Good video Mr. Beat
Thank you Keith!
As a conservative, I cringe when my peers suggest Nixon wasn’t corrupt
I hate to be so cynical, but most politicians have been corrupt to a certain extent.
I like nixon from everything I hear about him but the Gerald ford pardoning him just isnt right
Future video idea: US Supreme Court and European Court of Justice compared (how they operate, how much and which powers they have, how judges get appointed, for how long, etc.).
You should do the Supreme Court case us Nixon next
Thanks as usual for this video Mr. Beat, I've never really mastered down the entire Nixon resignation, and this helped a lot.
But wait a second, I thought Nixon wasn't a crook? He said it himself on live TV!
Just kidding, of course!
haha hey just a heads up, I have a full blown Watergate video planned for next month!
@@iammrbeat Yes! Can't wait for it!
Just recently watched "All the President's Men"; great movie. I had no idea how large Watergate really was.
One of the Spiciest/Interesting Supreme Court Brief to date!
ha! well it was a big one
Hey Mr. Beat. I dont think this video shows up in your video feed, however it does show up in the supreme court briefs playlist
I did that on purpose for the folks who follow the playlist :)
I remember a political cartoon from the 70’s titled something like “Nixon and the Incredible Vanishing Tapes” which showed Nixon holding a tape reel in each hand with short fragments of tape suspended between them. Sadly I can’t find a copy of this one online; I don’t recall if it was in a local newspaper or Mad Magazine.
Nixon: ''Just to let you guys know that I am NOT a crook!''
Supreme Court: ''You sure about that, Nixon?''
Nixon: *Sweats profusely*
Well done, Mr. Beat..."I am not a crook", how about those "Tapes with missing sections"? The ONLY U.S. President to resign, Quit...He knew he was going to get the AX...Great job/Great content.
2:49-2:51 * walls actually close in * CLEVER, animation actually made me laugh aloud
You should consider In re: Gault. It was one of only a few Supreme Court decisions that addressed the civil rights of children. It is very interesting.
More briefs please!
2:03 - nice
My list of who I side with in every Supreme Court Briefs episode so far:
Gregg v. Georgia: I side with Gregg
Terry v. Ohio: I side with Terry
West Virginia BOE v. Barnette: I side with Barnette
Brandenburg v. Ohio: I reluctantly side with Brandenburg
D.C. v. Heller: I side with D.C.
Roe v. Wade: I side with Roe
McCulloch v. Maryland: I side with McCulloch
Engel v. Vitale: I side with Engel
Morse v. Frederick: I side with Frederick
Nix v. Hedden: I side with Nix
Miranda v. Arizona: I side with Miranda
Brown v. BOE: I side with Brown
Texas v. Johnson: I side with Johnson
Gideon v. Wainwright: I side with Gideon
Citizens United v. FEC: I side with FEC
Dred Scott v. Sandford: I side with Dred Scott
Obergefell v. Hodges: I side with Obergefell
Debs v. United States: I side with Debs
ABC v. Aereo: I side with Aereo
Graham v. Connor: I side with Graham
Gibbons v. Ogden: Gibbons
FCC v. Pacifica Foundation: I side with Pacifica Foundation
Westside Community BOE v. Mergens: I side with Mergens
United States v. Windsor: I side with Windsor
Texas v. White: I side with Texas
Loving v. Virginia: I side with Loving
Crawford v. Washington: I side with Crawford
New York Times Co. v. United States: I side with New York Times Co.
Plyer v. Doe: I side with Doe
Sony v. Universal: I side with Sony
Tinker v. Des Moines: I side with Tinker
Worcester v. Georgia: I side with Worcester
FCC v. ABC: I side with ABC
Mapp v. Ohio: I side with Mapp
Salinas v. Texas: I side with Salinas
United States v. Miller: I side with United States
Buck v. Bell: I side with Buck
Korematsu v. United States: I side with Korematsu
United States v. The Amistad: I side with The Amistad
Maryland v. King: I side with King
Bush v. Gore: I side with Gore
Impression Products v. Lexmark: I side with Impression Products
United States v. Wong Kim Ark: I side with Wong Kim Ark
Marbury v. Madison: I side with Marbury
Shaw v. Reno: I reluctantly side with Reno
Wisconsin v. Yoder: I side with Yoder
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke: I side with Bakke
U.S Term Limits v. Thornton: I side with Thornton
The Scottsboro Boys Cases: I side with the Scottsboro Boys
Kelo v. New London: I side with Kelo
Murphy v. NCAA: I side with Murphy
Plessy v. Ferguson: I side with Plessy
The Slaughterhouse Cases: I side with the Butchers
New Jersey v. T.L.O: I side with T.L.O
Jacobson v. Massachusetts: I side with Massachusetts
Katz v. United States: I side with Katz
Hazelwood School District v. Kuhlmeier: I side with Kuhlmeier
Shelby County v. Holder: I side with Holder
Griswold v. Connecticut: I side with Griswold
Lemon v. Kurtzman: I side with Lemon
The Insular Cases: I side with DeLima, Downes, Gonzalez and Balzac
Planned Parenthood v. Casey: I side with Planned Parenthood
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell: I side with Hustler Magazine
United States v. Nixon: I side with United States
President During this time: Self-Explanatory
Chief Justice: Warren E. Burger
Argued July 8, 1974
Decided July 24, 1974
Case Duration: 16 Days
Decision: 8-0 in favor of United States
Can you make a ranking of state economys video?
United States v. Bhagat Singh Thind and Ozawa v. United States?
Also great video as always Mr Beat.
Thank you, and I hadn't heard of both those cases!
I know that Warren Burger was the Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court during the US Supreme Court Case
United States v. Nixon
0:35 True, so true!
I love you mr beat
Babe, wake up. Mr. Beat posted a new Supreme Court brief video.
Great video, SCOTUS cases were always my favorite in Civics class and this takes me right back there.
I’ve been wondering for years of what exactly watergate is and how it brought Nixon down, this is the first time in 19 years that I finally known the truth.
Thank you Mr. Beat, you could’ve save my life during my history test.
I kind of hope there is another scandal involving the Watergate Hotel so we can call it Watergate-gate
YAS
Nobody is above the law
Very convenient timing with the release of this video Mr Beat.
I didn't plan it out that way tbh
I’ve watched and liked every single supreme court brief
"I fought the law, and the law won."
- Sonny Curtis
Instant clickin and echolaliaing along as you say "Supreme Court Briefs" **happyflaps**
lol nice
Can you make a video explaining why most urban areas are liberal and most rural areas are conservative?
I love this suggestion
Can you do a video about INS v. Chadha case?
I'll look into this
3:27 Did the judge say this or did the lawyer as other sources say the lawyer did?
With last night's FBI raid of Mar-a-logo, this video feels very topical right now. Maybe that's why it was in my recommendations.
And to answer the question, NO, the President is not above the law. :)
Please do the recent case on The Boston marathon bombers death penalty. As a Massachusetts citizen that day was horrific
I love your videos and your great scarstic kind of humour!!! it's reassuring when someone knows his own history and the true story that is!!! let's keep the...beat on!!!! greetings from Belgium ✌️🍻✅
Thank you Bernard 🙂