I tried the variable ND from k and f but it left a horrible cross pattern at the end . Im sure the regular ones are fine..I went with the neewer variable
That is always a risk with variable NDs. I have a regular variable ND for my camera and (although it's older) it works fine but definitely suffers from the x cross pattern. I will probably stick with solid NDs for my needs without the risk of that dreaded X
@@shawnchencoTry the regular VND 2-5 and 6-9 from Freewell for your mirrorless. They have a slight warm colour cast but because of the hard stops there is barely any vignetting. They are about 100 euros a piece, but were worth the money imo.
This video popped up on my feed. I do similar videos and want to let you know your content is really good. It seems that the Polar Pro was a bit stronger so it looked a lot better. I did a comparison Video with the K&F concept VND filters and the Freewell, and found the K&F were actually stronger. After looking at my own footage, I really like the K&F VND's.
I like the K&F for size/profile. I was looking at Freewell filters for my main camera since I was looking for a magnetic system for quick swapping. Was it a big price difference between the two?
@@shawnchenco I just have a screw on type for my main camera. When I looked into the magnetic type for it, they were much more expensive. It's hard for me to spend a lot on these filters but if I had to do it again, I'd get one with hard stops so I don't over rotate and get the dreaded x-pattern. I don't like non variable ND's because if I'm using them it's outside and outside lighting changes.
@@TimBrownTown non variable for photos mainly but if you have a slight variable range for your ISO you might be able to make it work. That is how I will be using my NDs so I don't have to worry about bumping the tiny threads and can just pop it on and go. But I will probably keep a few in my pouch for big changes in light 👍
I tried the variable ND from k and f but it left a horrible cross pattern at the end . Im sure the regular ones are fine..I went with the neewer variable
That is always a risk with variable NDs. I have a regular variable ND for my camera and (although it's older) it works fine but definitely suffers from the x cross pattern. I will probably stick with solid NDs for my needs without the risk of that dreaded X
@@shawnchencoTry the regular VND 2-5 and 6-9 from Freewell for your mirrorless. They have a slight warm colour cast but because of the hard stops there is barely any vignetting. They are about 100 euros a piece, but were worth the money imo.
@@Koensol I might have to take a look at those thanks
This video popped up on my feed. I do similar videos and want to let you know your content is really good. It seems that the Polar Pro was a bit stronger so it looked a lot better. I did a comparison Video with the K&F concept VND filters and the Freewell, and found the K&F were actually stronger. After looking at my own footage, I really like the K&F VND's.
I like the K&F for size/profile. I was looking at Freewell filters for my main camera since I was looking for a magnetic system for quick swapping. Was it a big price difference between the two?
@@shawnchenco I just have a screw on type for my main camera. When I looked into the magnetic type for it, they were much more expensive. It's hard for me to spend a lot on these filters but if I had to do it again, I'd get one with hard stops so I don't over rotate and get the dreaded x-pattern. I don't like non variable ND's because if I'm using them it's outside and outside lighting changes.
@@TimBrownTown non variable for photos mainly but if you have a slight variable range for your ISO you might be able to make it work. That is how I will be using my NDs so I don't have to worry about bumping the tiny threads and can just pop it on and go. But I will probably keep a few in my pouch for big changes in light 👍