The 5 Signs of Psychopathy in Prince Harry's Spare
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 сен 2024
- Harry's book Spare has moments that made my hair stand on end, making me consider whether he might be a psychopath or sociopath. I read these passages out and wonder aloud whether Prince Harry might just be on the psychopath spectrum. There is also extreme narcissism with both him and Meghan Markle, as explained by the Baggage Claim channel in their video THE 5 STAGES OF A RELATIONSHIP WITH A NARCISSIST (Whats going on with Prince Harry and Meghan Markle.
What must it be like to be in a relationship with this prime example of a narcissist? Does he have a Messiah Complex, as psychologist Jo Hemmings analysed for Talk TV?
#princeharry #psychopath #spare
---
DISCLAIMER -
The content of this and all of my videos are my opinions based on detailed research that I have performed. Please do you own research before you make up you own mind.
All materials in these videos are used for educational purposes and fall within the guidelines of fair use. No copyright infringement is intended. If you are or represent the copyright owner of materials used in this video and have a problem with the use of said material, please send me an email. My address is in my About section.
So is he a psychopath? A sociopath (I used them interchangeably)? Or NONE of those things. Let me know!
Andrew you are on the ball but your presentation of the facts really was hilarious. If this had been a 'stand-up' routine you would have rocked the house. Not sure that this was your intention but I honestly laughed so hard with each new revelation. You are really keeping us going with your analysis of this, dare I call it 'book', and you are getting it so right every time. I have seen so many people (including you) discussing the symptoms and characteristics of psychopathy / sociopathy and the points you raised are massive red flags to say the least. There is something really, really not right there and if he wasn't such a plonker I would almost feel sorry for him but not a chance! Please keep it coming. I never thought Harry's likely psychopathy would make my day 😂 Thank you as always. You're a gem!
I think "absolute minging arsehole" probably covers all bases...
He has an Oedipus complex, stunted maturity, and Psychopathic traits.
I think we can confidently write a big red "YIKES" at the top of a psychiatric assessment of Harry.
Check out Royal Babylon (Uncut) by Heathcote Williams Prince Philip, and Prince Charles shot 50 boars in one day.
Definitely agree on psycopath traits he also suffers from persecution mania- everyone is out to get him, they’re always wrong & he is always right, he is owed apologies but never owes anyone an apology. He is a very sick man.
I heard that his persecution mania and perhaps paranoia was a big issue with his ex girlfriends Chelsea and Cressida, I think it was the latter, she saw a very dark side to Harry and ran a mile.
“Infamy, infamy! They’ve all got it in for me!”
@@Joanna7428
Thing is, people are out to get him...
I'd love the cameras to be turned on you bunch of tits , little gossips , scoring some kind of schadenfreude out of your own God knows what crappery.
Would it be better not to focus on this bollocks.
I don't know why this has come up in my feed but this is bitchy and speculative bollocks.
What are you people but defining yourself off flotsam and jetsam " celebrities"
@@Joanna7428 💯
For me, Harry’s treatment of his father in this book is the worst. Aside from invading his father’s privacy to reveal details to try and mock him (the teddy bear or the exercises he does for pain), he references 3 huge losses his father suffers in the book with zero empathy for him and centers himself as the victim. His fathers loss of The Queen Mother (who was a surrogate mother), the loss of Prince Philip and then the loss of the Queen. While she was actively dying and Charles was about to become King, he had to put up with Harry’s tantrum to bring Meghan to her death bed. At no point does he ask his father if he’s ok, needs anything etc. It’s all about him and his needs and wants. Really disturbing.
Also his treatment of the Queen in her last days was shameful and people don't forget that. He was also disrespectful to Prince Philip. Megan reportedly told the Queen to drop dead. People don't forget these things.
@@ganymeade5151 Reportedly? That's gossip. Gossip monger.
@@elephantintheroom5678 It fits with her character, so is possibly true.
@@joseeallyn9950 Do you know her? Or did you get all this supposed "knowledge" about her character from nasty gossips, too?
@@elephantintheroom5678 This woman is not the sort of person I would want to meet socially. She has put out so much publicity that she has revealed exactly what she she is really like. I don't have to consult 'gossips' to assess her behaviour and her character. The news from Britain, South Africa and Australia does nothing to assure me of her truthfullness, sweet nature, or moral attitudes. Her behaviour towards her half siblings and her generous father is a disgrace. On the treatment of her father alone I would avoid her like the plague. Her husband is probably her just deserts. He seems to be cowed by her and as he doesn't have a stellar record of behaviour since childhood, they probably deserve each other.
Very possibly. But the anti-animal behavior isn't some weird hunting ritual, it's when he loses his temper and pulls up his polo pony like she's a Harley. Disgusting.
Excellent distinction.
and the story I heard was that the pony was pregnant....
@Kevin Blythe Unfortunately, there's more than one incident. He should have been banned from playing.
@@kevinblythe2192the one that died was.
I also want to know how Guy, Harry and Meghan's beagle, ended up with both of his front legs broken. That incident has never been explained.
My girlfriend watched her Mum being murdered when she was only 12! She doesn't carry on like this! Loads of people have had horrific childhoods, without the privilege, they don't carry on!
Dumb people can never let go of their delusions and false sense of offenses and being harmed. They replay and amplify minor or imagined offenses over and over. Their "midget" minds are extremely fragile and need constant babying. They use false offense and accusations as an excuse to abuse others. These types are dangerous and undesirable. Avoid them.
Yes I knew an elderly extremely kind man, was very kind to me as a child and into adulthood, he too was in the house when his father murdered his mum, his father was tried and was hung.he was orphaned and in a home by age 12. You could not meet a kinder person. Harry has no excuse for his behaviour, his conduct was bad long before Dianna died, he kicked Williams shin through jealousy Di rewarded him with a hug, hr was reprimanded in school for cheating,in her own words Di told him it was alright to cheat so long as he didn't get caught, so no retribution for his bad behaviour. The Jesuit priests had a wise saying, give me the boy till he is 6 and I will show you the man,these are the years that behaviour is laid down.William wasn't spoilt, he was a future King,and had to be seen to be behaving properly , Harry wouldn't have lasted one year as ," the heir" he couldn't behave properly as " the spare"
Love and prayers for your friend. Real people survive even the most horrible circumstances, they retain their own humanity in spite of horror, we see that all the time with veterans and victims of war who have experienced ghastly situations but in spite of inward and outward wounds remain nice , gentle and empathetic humans. There are privileged people (like Prince Philip and Karl Habsburg ) who have endured great hardships and fearful circumstances but have certainly NOT behaved like this little self centered swine.
@@joseeallyn9950exactly! Prince Phillip had a horrible early life, Haz should take note! Thankyou for love n prayers for my friend, blessings to you.
Everybody's different in the head
Go back and look at the footage of Charles & Diana visiting the Spanish Royals with the boys when they were very little. Harry keeps picking up this puppy and the puppy is very uncomfortable & wriggling to get away. The adults are not registering it. But William does. William rescues the puppy twice on camera. I pray he continued to do it. You can see the empathy in William. You can’t in Harry. Also spurring his horse during polo to bleeding, poor horse.
Harry used to love kids and they loved him, but that’s an awesome amount of attention an adult can get from a child. And narcs love that feeling. So that can also be a sign. Because all sociopaths are narcs but not all narcs are sociopaths.
He has no fear, no remorse, & no regrets -all signs of sociopathy.
He also is suspected of shooting protected Hen Harriers years ago. The police were involved.
Oh my goodness!!! How very observant. How did you pick up on that?
@@noramckay3342 The puppy? Because it was upsetting me -I get very upset if animals are suffering (humans too!) and it was bothering me so I was really relieved to see William rescue the pup and then Harry was on it again and as a parent I’m thinking “why are none of these adults correcting him?!! And saving the pup?!” But nope. Just William. There are old videos of William being very caring and worrying like a little parent over Harry too. That guy has a lot of empathy. Plus just the fact that he did Search & Rescue -he knew he wasn’t allowed to serve in the military-he must have planned all along to serve in that manner. And Harry in his book acts like William’s a loser for doing SAR. 🙄
Yes, I saw that video. I bet he caused much grief thru the years.
@@olderwiser64 Thank you for the explanation!!:--) I noticed how kind prince William was. Yes, the adults are just tools. We've always had golden retrievers and there's no way I would have allowed my kids to hold a puppy that way. I would have made Harry sit down and put the dog in his lap. Dogs need to be held with a hand under their bottom. What is wrong with those people???
That's what the book should've been called..."Profit without Honour".
Harry’s Psychopathy is beyond evident. Thank you for finally saying it.
It's about 24 hours since I first heard the snippets of Harry's delight in taunting and abusing the matron.
I have not been able to rid myself of the images my mind conjures up and I genuinely find it devastating.
Awful to do such things in the first place, but to then put it in his book is beyond despicable.
How do the participants in INVICTUS GAMES feel about his attitude towards disabled people?
He is certainly a damaged individual, which in a lot of ways is unsurprising, but this book... omg...
Somebody should have stopped him.
That one sticks with me aswell. Only certain types of children would think & act like that. By extension, it takes a sick individual to describe it like that in his middle age without remorse.
Harry has really exposed who he really is.I think he is closer to a psychopath due to cruelty to animals and people that he considers less than him.
@@marilyn9138 so succinctly put.......
this is a very good point - it might explain how his popularity is slipping
Yes, and to think the editors cut his first draft by half (according to Harry!).
I hate Harry even more now that I know he’s cruel to animals. The fact they he could be so hurtful and rude about this poor teacher is disgusting!!
Yep. Me too.
Same
And me. I simply hate him so much.
It's difficult to say if he's a psychopath or sociopath, but I am continually surprised by his complete and utter lack of responsibility, empathy, and gratitude demonstrated in each and every interview. He reads as a damaged child in an adult body with a grown-up vocabulary who is unaware of who he may have been at one time. Spare shows his obsession with himself to the extent that he is unable to be objective about appropriateness. He wanted to dump, so he dumped. God save the rest of the world.
I think he's a sociopath with psychopathic tendencies.
@@deliabianco5259 I'm not willing to put that type of clinical label to it, except that his personality is very immature for his age, and he does show some narcissistic tendencies. I believe his emotional growth was arrested at or around the time of his mother's death and he's reliving those experiences via other relationships: anger, resentment, obsession, extreme personality guarding in the form of paranoia, guilt, arrogance,.... I haven't met him (obviously), so it's all speculation!
I also believe he has a lot of self-hatred because he is very self-detructive. He doesn't seem to fear death. His behavior is reckless & impulsive. People who don't fear death are not alive in the inside.
@@morningglory3644 I don't see self-destructive behavior in Harry.
@@voices_vary yeah, because you are a sugar lump...
I read “Spare” because I loved J.R.Moehrings book “ The Tender Bar”. “Spare is well written, but I couldn’t help but think Harry’s ghost writer hated him. The only empathetic episode in this book is Diana’s death. Harry is presented as cruel, jealous, petty, treacherous, self-righteous, delusional, paranoid and dumb. The book is salacious and dangerous(admitting to killing 25 Taliban). Don’t expect this book to be inspirational. The “man Harry has become” is a sad, angry man descending into madness. All the money in the world cannot but intellect or sanity and hatred and revenge cannot be compartmentalized. His maladjustment will be unleashed on his wife and children unfortunately.
I've been wondering why Moehringer still wanted to be associated with this book. I don't know if Moehringer hated Harry, but I do feel he tried to warn the world about Harry. Usually the ghostwriter stays silent, but I'd really want to hear his reasons from himself.
I feel Harry presents himself like he is, because he isn't smart enough to recognise and veil what's inside of him. The only things he can tweak are the things on the outside and the events. And he often seems to do that.
ruclips.net/video/o4L6vdtq7xw/видео.html
I haven't read it, but--even without reading it--I am getting the impression that the ghostwriter went out of his way to zing Harry, and Harry has no clue. I think you're thoughts are spot on.
Umm ghost writer left/fired….halfway through book….TW??????
Very interesting H & ms quest for world domination
I'm not a psychiatrist either, but I think he's closer to sociopath than psychopath. In my career I investigated many of each, and those who were diagnosed as psychopaths were never able to assume anything resembling a subservient role. They seemed incapable of it, but it seems like Harry has been subservient in his marriage. Plus, at least the psychopaths I dealt with, all professionals, tried hard to conceal their Machiavellian view of the world. At least from what I've heard about his book, he doesn't seem to do a good job of that. He may have another "diagnosis". I'm not sure if I heard this in one of your earlier videos or dreamed it up myself, but I think Meghan has replaced Dianna as his "mother".
Harry did not need a wife; he needed someone to replace Diana as his mother. Harry felt other than his mother, nobody else gave Harry the love, affection and attention. He felt he was all alone in his life.
@@sheilaewall4426 I agree with you, I just want to point out that if Harry thinks he's been all alone in his life, just wait. When Meghan tosses him to the curb, he will learn the true meaning of being all alone.
Harry has not only been subservient in his marriage but also on those events where he did physical labour. Such as in Australia and South Africa.
Do you think maybe that Harry’s unhealthy obsession with Diana started when Diana was still alive? Looks like she overindulged and spoilt her baby boy?
There's no stable definition of psychopath vs sociopath. Even Dr. Robert Hare, who studied psychopathy in prison populations states that the terms are used interchangeably for various reasons. Some use the term 'sociopathy' to emphasize their belief that the cause is nurture/society, rather than nature. He also says that 'sociopathy' is sometimes preferred because people tend to confuse psychopathy with psychosis.
Another brilliant analysis! I haven't read the book and won't. But I've heard about the passage (and thanks for reading it out loud) about him mocking his disabled teacher. If he was not even a bit psychopathic, he would not have been able to describe the scene in such detail - almost like he is still enjoying it. The "guess who was most enthusiastic..." line tells it all: At the age of 38 who identifies with the woke culture, how could he not have any shame or remorse of what he did there? Where is the sensitivity?
Hes having to tell the tale with objectivity, as honestly as he can remember it. I remember boys in my teenage years who were just as bad, or worse, than Harry was. Boys can get caught up in piss taking and bravado in front of their mates. Theres nothing psychopathic about this at all. Its just young boys acting immaturely and having little empathy. Happens all the time.
@@mystique592 actually, whilst having no empathy is often considered a trait of psychopathy it's not one of the four defining traits we tend to use as a basis for diagnosis. You need a comprehensive assessment to be considered psychopathic and you can have no empathy and not be psychopathic at all. In fact, it's narcissism that's more often than not characterised by a lack of empathy. I can't remember off the top of my head, and I should I'm a psychiatric nurse who's almost finished my masters, but the four defining characteristics are remorselessness, pitilessness, inability to love and insensitivity to the possiblity of harm. All of these have a hand in the no empathy label but they are more specific. Teenagers, especially boys, in this early developmental stage often display little to no empathy whilst in group. It's normal. As I was trying to say in my earlier comment. I don't think Prince Harry is a psychopath. I think people are looking at him through the media lens and making assumptions. Check out some of the usual psychopath traits and you'll see he doesn't really display any of them. At best, maybe he's a vulnerable narcissist. At best.
@@mystique592 didn't mean to sound all "know it all" on you. It's just I work in the mental health sector and I know how much work goes into making a diagnosis. It's often based upon multi agency reports and in depth testing before the clinician makes his decision. Which is why I get a little irritated when media types - and I DO love Andrews interviews - appear to throw labels at people having never met them. I suppose it's just speculation but when it comes to celebrities there's often too much personal bias involved and not enough objectivity. But everyone is entitled to their opinion.
I’ve worked with psychiatric hospitals
Psychopaths remain hidden in society or prison
But I’ve meet some malignant narcissists
I tell colleagues, don’t argue you can’t win
Only side with their source of fuel
At best.
Harry sociopath on psychopath spectrum
He was not nurtured enough
His mother left to go date men travel
Divorce is a time to be with children the most
@@loulabelle5082 he's referring to her as "the tortoise" still. That is so offensive and for you to even try to justify that is insane. Yes at that age he myt not have had enough sense to be empathetic, but reflecting on it it's something he should be ashamed of. He doesnt at all reflect on it with regrwt. Imagine that was your grandmother and some almost 40 year old man wrote a book and reminisced of the torture they inflicted upon her with no remorse?? And referring to her as the tortoise? Come on!
Geez what would Eugenie think of him slagging off Matron pat for having a crooked spine.
Excellent analysis! I would add lack of empathy in relation to his brother who would definitely feel hurt and betrayed by the revelations in this book
He shows no empathy for the people he killed calling them chess pieces. There is no empathy throughtout the book for anyone including KC, PW, PC, QCC..There is no insight, no growth, calling a woman with a disability ugly & not provoking an erection is juvenile. Hazbeen is a Narcissist. PERIOD. Some narcissists are psychopaths
There’s lack of empathy, in a passive way. And then there’s the malignant narcissist that’s obsessed and driven by revenge. Harry’s treatment of his brother, sister-in-law, stepmother is a wilfully malicious targeted attack, designed to deeply hurt personally, but I think his ultimate intent and hope was to publicly shame, humiliate and ‘cancel’ them. I can’t fathom the amount of bitterness, jealousy, rage and entitlement it takes to believe he could and should destroy his own family before a world audience.
@@batubop651 And he does the bashing repeatedly. Over and over. Sick.
Even the title of the book is a red flag to me, ‘Spare’ is playing victim from the first word. Instead of embracing his wealth, privilege, and freedom from duty William doesn’t get, Harry wallows in his poor self. My heart bleeds for him. Maybe he should turn to Margaret for inspiration. There were some truely tragic events in her life bestowed apron her by the royal family and yet she stood side by side her sister her whole life. Thanks Andrew.
Harry sounds really bitter and jealous. Makes me wonder that he didn't want to be born as a second child, he would have wanted to be the first born. It's such a ridiculous title for his book.
The more I observe about Harry is that I am very glad he’s the spare that was never needed to become the heir.
What's frightening about this is that these traits could equally apply to his wife.
I've been saying this about the pair of them from the beginning. The way they've treated their family members was a big red flag to me.
I believe Harry has absorbed his wife's psychopathy. I saw you had H.G.Tudor on your Podcast recently. From his insight, I've gained a better understanding on how a weak vessel like Harry can go from having empathy to writing a book that on the surface, has him appearing rather creepy. What I do have issues with is the constant blaming of his behavior on him being a Royal. Harry's desire to paint Charles as a cold father comes off extremely weak. There's tons of photos of Charles interacting with Harry and William. Also it's well documented that Harry is extremely pissed that Charles cut his financial purse strings in 2021. Harry and Meghan wanted the RF to continue supporting their causes while they live in California on the British taxpayers dime. Charles sounds like a father who doesn't have a problem executing tough love to his spoiled son.
Harry was raised from birth to believe he is 'better' than just about everyone else, and the rest are there to serve and adore him - that's what being a prince is about, almost as if they are a different species. Add to this Meghan's grandiosity, and you have two entitled pieces of ... work.
@@jeannehunter5344 Exactly! He's raised believing his family is there to protect, cover for him, and tolerate HIS behavior, but not his wife's. He can't seem to see how that attitude is being used against him.
He should know that a child can have a real damaging childhood, like being abused , mentally or sexually. Beaten daily , deprived of love and support . When he recalls his father saying “ my darling boy “ ,holding hands , having the extended family to look out for you ,is all so good . His mum died , he knows how . Some kids have murdered parents that never get closure. Ok he only got 2 sausages and the smaller room , ( in a castle, not a semi ) he is incredibly thick , maybe he is on the spectrum but he needs a good slap .
Under age 18 years, cannot make diagnosis of Antisocial Personality Disorder.
You dont absorb it dumaz. What r you a sponge
There's scenes in popular movies where animals have been killed and the hunter is then encouraged to be fully aware of what is needed to create food and to respect death. What strikes me as most interesting is not that this happened, but Harry's response. His locus of control is entirely external and dependent on not disappointing others. This is no doubt to avoid rejection. A child's whole sense of survival rests on not being rejected. He represses his own response (self) to the point of what sounds like dissociation (limpness, dismissmal of his own existence). I haven't read the book, I'm not a therapist, but I do recognise that regular dissocation and dismissal will result in considerable mental illness.
I find the labels less concerning than the glorification of such conditions. The man needs private therapy not global book deals.
this comment is so good bc it provides a totally different but plausible interpretation using the same information, which (imo) goes to show that we make reality into these stories that may or may not have anything to do with reality or truth anymore.
PS: are there any people left in the western world that haven't been diagnosed as psychopaths and/or narcissists on tik tok or yt?😢
@@happyhouse4948 I know nothing of his situation but the symptoms I've described can just as easily be attributed to Complex PTSD. Diana was apparently known to have BPD (Borderline Personality Disorder). Children of BPD parents can grow up with CPTSD, codependent, even mimicking their BPD's parents unstable sense of self due to an unhealthy internalised parental image and they become very emotionally deregulated and shut down. Add to that extra trauma and the other cluster A and B personality types Harry has been around and it would be hard for him to be unaffected.
So well put! Harry to ne is traumatized by a disgusting, terrible family. When you're "raised" by psychopaths you don't learn empathy, etc. and you MUST hide your emotions at all times or you will be targeted further. Let's give Harry 10 years away from these monsters and then judge him? So few people understand abuse it upsets me.
It does seem that he has too much therapy; there is a point where if it hasn't worked it actually does more harm than good.
There was a scene in a British drama (Vera) where the storyline dealt with hunters and the script talked about that exact "rite of passage" with one's first kill. I thought it was only for effect, had no idea it may be part of that British hunting culture.
That lady pat should never have been in his book he's despicable.
Some sentences are missing. The ones where he acknowledges fault. And a sentence with the Elizabeth Arden cream that he set aside his thoughts before applying it. But apparently the ghostwriter told the world who Harry is.
Do we cry over Charlie Manson? Do I have empathy for Harry? No.
Harry no, but I still have some empathy left for the Sussex children. They are not safe. I can't imagine how the normals and the empaths feel in the Windsor, Markle and Ragland families.
I’m genuinely fed up of hearing his name, and his wife’s too. They wanted freedom so just go away!
Me too. But I can’t seem to get away from it. And I’m starting hate Diana too.
They want "freedom" but as typical delusionals, what they really want is the freedom to do as they please, with all the publicity and accolades they believe they deserve.
Far far away, Please Now.
@@Stardusted1
I'm starting to see Diana more clearly and the impact her condition might have had on Harry. It's a miracle William turned out the way he is. But then again, Diana was in a worse mental state with the boulimia when she was pregnant with Harry than when she was pregnant with William.
The Wales children are blessed with Catherine as their mother and the Middletons as their extended family. I am worried for the Sussex children though.
@@DutchJoan Yes William being a part of their family obviously has made a big difference in his life.
Agree - but think he is more on sociopath ( impulsive, disorganised) spectrum. I looked at him at the two funerals and (to me) he did not look particularly grief stricken, more someone who is putting on correct expression. I noticed this on both occasions, especially in contrast to those around him. I’d be interested if it was just me that felt this.
Yeah, he looked more stressed to me. But then again, adult grandchildren frequently don't feel the grief or loss as keenly as the adult children.
@@ckp2ator389 I do understand that, but the Queen was such a massive figure, I was surprised he did not seem particularly impacted by her loss & the funeral.
@@fergusodonnell5743 I don't think he treated her as if he loved her during her last year. She was more a tool to him to get the terms he wanted. ETA: That seems like a sociopathic trait to use people for your own ends.
It's only now you mention it that I can process what I witnessed. You are correct in your observation. Normally when people grief their cheeks fall, but Harry looked like the guards.
@@ckp2ator389and angry.
I could never understand how he could condone her bullying behavior at the palace. But he is the same!!!
Empathic reaction to the Stag episode would be to be humbled by the animals death and respectful of its life.
Disturbing recurrence of bullying animals and disabled people indicates disdain for weakness.
It is typical of those on the narcissistic/sociopathic spectrum to be ultimately concerned about public image. He strives to appear honorable. They really have no sense of identity.
I was married to a narcissist/sociopath for forty years.
I have spent the last four years recovering my identity and strength, as well as educating myself on this disorder. If I had known why things always felt strange and lonely in his company all those years, I would have run. I was brainwashed to think it was my flaw at the root of the disfunctional relationship.
I have been psychologically and physically abused. My food has been poisoned and horrible accidents have been set up, all in the most covert of ways. He pretended to adore our dog and the first time she was left in his care, he caused her spinal discs to prolapse. She was paralysed and put to sleep at the age of two.
It's as if these people have made a deal with satan to create chaos and pain, especially in those who are empathetic souls.
If Harry and Meghan are both narcissist/sociopaths, and I believe they are - they deserve each other. Just shows how much damage on a grand scale these creatures can do if they have the money to keep re- inventing their public image. They are all pathological liars. Most normal people are unaware of their intentions, until they happen, because our minds aren't wired that ruthless, selfish way.
They are terrible creatures. Glad you got away. They want you to think you are the problem! Good post.
I'm a Sociologist and retired Alcohol and Drug Counsellor, I would have picked up right away he was lying about drugs. Plus in my head I would have double his use, as it's well known addicts lie how much they use!
Harry's mother, Princess Diana, had borderline personality disorder. There's evidence that it runs in families, being partly learned and partly hereditary. Along with an unstable identity, there is rage and paranoia. Meghan provides for him an identity. She can also take it away.
No. There is no diagnosis by a doctor for Diana saying she had borderline personality disorder. Stop spreading misinformation. She had an eating disorder and suffered from depression.
@@kittye8340 Where do you get your evidence that she had bulimia and depression? Did you talk to a doctor? What is your proof? Bulimia and depression are symptoms of BPD. Actually, Lady Colin Campbell, who knew Diana well, quotes a psychiatrist. Her children played with both Prince Harry and Prince William. You might want to read her book, "The Real Diana". Others have written on it as well.
I firmly believe, prince Harry had BPD. People with BPD and NPD are magnets.
Agreed BPD. And she is a narcissist who uses his fears to her advantage including a deep fear of abandonment
It's often the case that children of a borderline parent develop personality disorders other than borderline, such as npd or avoidant personality disorder. He doesn't strike me as a bpd, even if Meghan is a narcissist. Curious which bpd traits you see in Harry however?
the idea that a constant stream of "I love yous" is essential to mental health is a uniquely American tradition. In many languages and cultures people do not constantly use these words and still manage to communicate love and care for each other.
Yes. I saw videos with Charles being very tactile with his son Harry, touching him with concern. Hugs are not the only way to show affection.
Don"t forget a lot of this was written by his wife after the ghost writer left due to her interference.
Because we're a sociopathic society
4_kassis. Couldn't agree with you more. I had the most wonderful kind parents who ever lived, never once was I kissed,hugged or told that they loved me.but I knew it automatically, in my day no one or very very few ever told their kids they loved them, just wasn't done, I think we kids were well brought up,we loved our parents and family,but didn't feel the need to tell them so. but I never heard any child speak I'll of his parents or siblings. This ,I love you" seems to be a modern American idea which a lot have adopted here. I have an elderly friend who all her relsgiond keep phomning her and assuring her that they love her, yet when she needs any help,its always outsiders run to her aid, her relatives are never available. She fell down her stairs recently,a gang of close relatives there,but each one had an excuse why they couldn't go to the hospital with her. I saw her being loaded into the ambulance I enquired as to who was going with her. there were a chorus of excuses,I asked her dsughtr in law,her w referred f reply was " who do you think ,Me" this lady has leukaemia,but is the one person there when needed.
Brilliant! You’re breaking ground here. I hope some of the other media pick up on your analysis and interview you.
Thanks !
I’m sure the RF had Harry pegged long ago. No wonder they don’t want to let go of him swiftly. They might be more worried about him than angry. And Harry knows that as soon as he gets tired of playing around in the real world, they’ll take him right back.
Harry needs a psychiatrist. Not just a psychologist. And now using illicit drugs, his paranoia and egocentrism will only increase.
Has anyone heard of any positive reviews of the book? I'm wondering this because I wonder if anyone has had the guts to let Harry know that this book makes him out to be "cruel, jealous, petty, treacherous, self-righteous, delusional, paranoid and dumb" (credit Terry Martin below)?
Amazon. 4.6/5, 31,000+ reviews
" Give me the boy to the age of seven, and I will show you the man."
The boy had many predisposing factors.
Nutritional deficiency in utero.
Hereditary genetics for psychological disorders.
No or very little discipline.
No boundaries, plus privilege, way above the norm.
Inferiority complex due to his position in the family.
Indulged by a doting mother.
An absent father, much of his early years.
An unstable and broken family unit , before the age of seven.
When you lay over the top of all this, the trauma of his mother's death. The overindulgence then given to him by his father. The lack of accountability for his mistakes. The incredible level of privilege and wealth. The paranoia of needing or being given up to 3 body guards as a teenager. The constant fishbowl existence. The academic achievements, that were given to him, without him achieving them. Etc., etc . He obviously needed much better grief counseling and therapy than he had in his teenage years.
By the time M came along, his personality disorders had, in my opinion developed into sociopath, with antisocial PD, probably PTSD, depression,, and all the things that go with his screwed existence. I.e. lack of accountability, lack of boundaries, but yet trapped in the RF and denied what he envisaged freedom to be. By all accounts he wanted out and the American, divorced actress was a rebellious, look at me, way to go !
He had NO IDEA, he was the prey of a Psychopath ! Narcsisstic, Antisocial, Borderline and Histrionic Personality Disorders in abundance.
So to answer your question Andrew, he was a sociopath and now is a sociopath with the injected personality traits of his wife who is also his mistress, his dominatrix, and his Mother. He at this point doesn't really know who, what, where or why he is. Isolated, disconnected from friends and family, manipulated, brainwashed and controlled. But he comes across as nasty and out of control as she does , because that is how he is programmed to believe he has to be for his own good and the good of the world, which they are going to save. It's some serious shite, that's for sure ! HE CAN be helped. SHE CANNOT!
I’m absolutely shocked.. appalled 😮 you forgot to mention that Stewie (Family Guy) had TWO goals in life - world domination and killing his loving, caring mother. In the early episodes he tries to kill Lois like a million times lol. I LOVE family guy. I hope Harry doesn’t mention them again 😂
Harry sounds like a scary jerk. He also sounds like my ex, who would say how much he loved lyring and he would morph personalities as well to suit whoever he was around, it blew my mind watching him do that. It would be everything as well, right down to how he would dress. He also loved it when he hurt people. He would genuinley be happy when he was taking people down. Harry sounds like the king (spare) of gaslighting, not only to himself but to the people around him. Yuk. The editing was excellent and hilarious by the way!
Thank you for sharing. I think Harry has had problems from a very earlier age which the Palace covered up. Probably still covering up.
Interesting!
I completely agree with that theory. And he may have resented that and--as a child--interpreted it as uncaring. He is still seeking boundaries. We call that the "I dare you to love me" personality--pushing boundaries, poking until they get the care they need.
@@voices_varyit seems Harry will resent anything anybody does for or against him.
@@voices_varywe must recognize SOME people will never be satisfied or at peace. It’s just not in DNA.
@@picilocarnal Yes, Harry seems to be one of them.
It's frightening that Harry lies, knows he lies, gets angry when his lies and uncovered and expects deferential treatment from the rest of us. It also shows his wife's comment about valuing kindness in a man above anything to be a lie. What an unpleasant pair.
I will never read the book, but of what I've heard, I think Harry's passages about Pat are THE MOST psychopathic.... Why.... just WHY, WHY, WHY would Harry write about Pat in his book AT ALL ... Pat doesn't seem to be a significant part of his life in any way, and certainly his behavior toward her is cruel and nasty - if I'd behaved like that as a child, (now, as a middle age man) I'd not want anyone to know how I treated her, and I'd be wanting to make it up to Pat in some way - not take one more shot at her in my book!!! It almost seems he's using the book as one last chance to taunt and humiliate her, without her being able to defend herself or retaliate. Not an ounce of compassion or even a shred of remorse for how his writing will make her (or her surviving friends and family, if she's passed) feel. How can Harry want us to know such horrible info about him?
Also, the part where he lied about the journalist, and was PROUD of it ... (no shame about it at all) ... I think it's safe to assume that's his MO, and how we should view ANYTHING he says. If he could lie like that about the journalist, AND BE PROUD OF IT, LIKELY, his whole book is just one huge lie.
The worst part about his lies is he talks about people emotions like his father and William and people accept it as what happened not his imagination.some of how William was scared for him I think never happened but a manipulative person they will say something positive so that they can back and say something negative ,the same people who believed the positive story that he made up would be questionable when he makes a negative story.
A filler , obviously not enough to put into it.
I had concerns too when I read about Pat. Is this her real name or enough about her for others to know who he is referencing? If she is still alive, I’m sure she didn’t expect to be in the book. I’ll admit I didn’t get much further in the book than that. I don’t care for the writing. It comes across to me like a cheap perfume that is nauseating! I’d read a sentence and need to stop and roll my eyes.
A book filler maybe.
Clinical and Forensic Psychologist, with a Master's in Neuroscience. 35yrs in Practice. My opinion is an assessment without the benefit of face to face consultation, granted. An avalanche of his own words and documented information from witnesses. His 'problems' and personality disorders in basic terms:
1.Arrested development, due to trauma at age 12yrs( almost 13 to be correct)
2.Unresolved grief. Morphed into Melancholia.
3.PTSD.
4.Drug use and/ or addiction, on going to the present day.
5. Stockholm Syndrome, on some level, seriously dangerous to him.
Therefore I would suggest Sociopathic rather than Psychopathic. The traits that people see, no remorse, a lack of empathy etc. are a result of being infused, saturated, manipulated and controlled.
IMO! His wife IS a Psychopath
She is his captor and controller. She governs every part of his life and has him totally disassociated from support and separated from friends, who previously served as H's sounding board and grounding.
Psychopaths prey on others and this is exactly what happened. It was a planned and plotted scheme, years in the making. H was the PERFECT victim, and victim he will remain. At this point he is oblivious to his demise, to the perception the world has of him. Until someone physically removes him and he is completely separated from her, deprogrammed, brought back into the real world, with all the accountability and consequences for his actions and words that awaits him, the situation is only going to deteriorate into more dire circumstance.
One last observation. The
? THERAPY, he is receiving currently is dangerous to his stability( what's left of it).
Designed and being encouraged, so as to keep him
under control and in a state if confusion and disassociation.
Keep him malleable, obedient and in a fog of adoration for his captor.
Hi....so i see what you see ....as patterns ....but dont know where this could lead....lead into a complete breakdown? ... or loss of life somehow...or a danger to his family used as a weapon my his controller? ....
Perhaps our parents were correct when they said things like "Bad Blood"? Check with Lady C.
@Angela. Right as rain, you are. I have been wishing that the Royal Family could get him away from her. They are too angry now to help him, I believe. She also has him trapped with the two children she had so quickly. (Her insurance.) He will never leave them, as he feels he was left. This won't end well for anyone. Not even Meghan, because, in the end, people having seen what she is all about, she will die alone and with nothing that matters. Harry is in serious danger in this situation. His sanity is crumbling right before our eyes.
Harry does NOT have ptsd. He just throws tantrums and drug induced paranoia fulled by self Importance
I think you're onto something here. It would explain a lot, especially the way he puts on so many persona's and his disdain for others. The way he refers to Caroline Flack in the book for example. Hilarious that he and his wife think of themselves as Royalty of Empathy! Thanks for your insight, interesting, keep it up.
Cruel is unforgiveable
I'm wondering how funny favorite cousin Eugenie would think Harry was for making fun of "Pat" who also suffered from scoliosis 🤔
Eh. I'm not keen on the current zeal to slap a semi-scientific label on everybody, as if people were specimens in a laboratory. There are instances where an individual really does present so much consistent, overwhelming evidence that it might be appropriate. (Meghan Markle, for example, truly is a walking textbook-case of clinical narcissism.) But usually, if borrowing terms from psychology at all, I prefer adjectives to nouns. So I'd just say Harry has some pronounced narcissistic and even psychopathic traits.
The one example given here that I find extremely disturbing is Harry's tale about the school matron. He goes into considerable detail in his description of her, to the point of mocking her all over again. He provides the world with her name. He describes exactly how the boys made fun of her. He declares that he was the prime star in that nasty play. PERIOD. Not one scintilla of remorse.
Many of us did unkind things in our youth just to get laughs or fit in with the group. We often were secretly a bit ashamed of it even as kids, but certainly later as adults we look bac with sorrow. But Harry? Not even the faintest whiff of shame --- from a man nearing 40. Yes, I think THAT is psychopathic.
Baddiel did very similar about the way he bullied a school mate. No remorse and was proud to re tell it. The boy’s mother was dying as well.
❤
Well said. His narratives hit me as being told by a young bully and not as an adult. The lack of remorse is chilling. He doesn’t seem to have learned anything in his life.
@@darlene6531 he is just vile…
His comment about being ´happy’ for his grandmother that she’d passed has been disturbing me. Yes we may feel relief when a loved one is released from suffering BUT HAPPY!?! And not even happy in amongst other felling like sadness, grief etc. No he just said HAPPY!
Was she suffering?
No one with a genuine care of someone they love is every "happy" when they die. Especially if they were suffering. I bet he had a weird creepy expression when he said that.
Even when he was little he always had an expression like the kid from "The Omen" (the original). I just thought he was just a mischievous look. But, now, not so much. Seems much more troubling and scary.
I absolutely agree . That statement gave me chills , especially after it seemed that Meghan and Harry did everything in their power to make the Queens ( Phillip ) last years miserable . I thought elder abuse right away .
Indeed. Harry was too happy. Screw loose.
The last words he told to her corpse is the creepiest part he whispers in her ear something to the affect “I hope your happy now” 😮 that’s the most condescending statement I’ve ever heard he’s truly a psycho
@@Cristina_504 yes! Forgot about that! Almost threatening whilst implying she lived an unhappy life! Awful - and yea she did no doubt have some unhappiness towards the end thanks to you, you nasty little gobshite!
Omg you’re right! That explains why we’re all so confused by their behaviour, as it doesn’t make sense by normal standards. Is she?
Im a retired Psych Nurse. I agree, he could a Sociopath. But he also fits the criterea for Narcissism.
"Profit without honor" 👍
I believe you are spot on here. There was a picture of Meghan's dog with two broken legs, very odd. I wonder how that came about.
It didn’t have “broken legs”. It had surgery to correct bad legs.
I am guessing that he can be explosive with his anger.
@@voices_vary You can guess all you wish but there doesn't appear to be a history out explosive anger.
@@alandeon It's a guess.
I don’t believe that stag scene for one minute. I also don’t believe that other people “made” Harry into anything. I think that he chose to use a variety of drugs, is probably still taking drugs, and is engaging in a boatload of self pity, largely fueled by drugs.
Another potential indicator of Harry's psychopathy is the cold, unempathic way he describes killing 25 people. I'm betting Harry also has these 'tells' as well: (a) lack of a startle response (b) lack of contagious yawning (c) feeling pleasure rather than disgust when looking at gory injuries or extreme violence against people or animals. His monotone, morose baseline suggests to me that a and b are highly likely.
I think the cracks have been there for a while. Enter his wife and his being easily led.
He's following a dialogue influenced by his wife and has been sucked into a world of toxicity.
Rotorua, New Zealand 🇳🇿
The face first into an animal carcass would have traumatised a normal person, but for him it was almost like a spiritual experience. Very creepy. I read in the book about him smoking a shopping bag of weed, which would explain his paranoia, too. I also get the impression he’s terribly jealous of Will and threatened by his and his father’s intelligence.
He'd be threatened by the intelligence of a potato.
Yes. I too worry about Harry's palpable jealousy and envy. I am concerned he might act on his feelings. I so hope the king and queen and the Wales's have extra good protection from any heinous action Harry might take. He is scary.
Hmmm,that's not what I got from hearing about it.Don't think you would try not to vomit if it was a spiritual experience.
My concern is the description of it. I know "blooding" is a thing with hunters but I've never heard of it being done like that.
Also he'd grown up around hunting, if that was the tradition there surely he would have seen it before.
You have to remember Harry has lied and over exaggerated incidents in his book. His army instructors have come out in force to deny his accounts, so I’m sure he’s exaggerating about his head being pushed into a carcass.
A diagnostic criteria for psychopathy is not feeling anxiety or fear. This would be a key factor in the distinction between determining sociopathy or psychopathy as there are overlaps in behaviours. All psychopaths have NPD. Sociopaths are typically the “sloppy crims” who give themselves away, whereas a psychopath is much more sophisticated & less likely to get caught in their wrong doing. Harry admits to overwhelming anxiety & media footage has shown this also. In my opinion, Harry would more likely fit the criteria for NPD with overlapping sociopathy. It is common for NPDs to have addictions.
Yes but he also constantly shows off about having no fear in the book. The anxiety stuff feels like jumping on the bandwagon for virtue and sympathy. But I don’t think he’s like a 40/40 psychopath. Just on the spectrum somewhere. Maybe I’ll do one next week on NPD coz he has that in spades as you say
They’re performative behaviours to individuate from his brother.
Love this. I usually only watch your videos on Scientology, but I see now I’m missing out. Will be going back to watch everything.
I’ve just started watching this channel too - this is one of the best vids ruclips.net/video/3UbVA9M-b3w/видео.html from Andrew and a narcissist expert - and I also like his videos with Dr Sohom Das (sorry hope i spelt his name correctly)
Thank you for your opinion! Really interesting. I love it when people connect the dots like this and speculate. No harm done, just food for thought.
The crippled teacher had to work. It may have been for financial reasons, to stay on a health plan she badly needed, or perhaps teaching kept her active and mobile. It was her life. Harry has never had to work. He has a access to health plans. He is only suffering from a crippled mind and his outlets for physical activity were many. The immense grounds of the palaces. Friends and family and assistants. Horses and wild game. The military adventures. The ability to be attractive to the opposite sex . The crippled teacher had none of these but she offered far more to the world than he ever did.
The evidence that he was not hugged by his father is rubbish. His mother was a public hugger; his father hugged him in private as evidenced by a number of ex security staff.
His grandmother adored him by accounts
Just when I thought I heard all angles on this already, you give a fresh and profound insight. Well done, appreciate it
Excellent points !! I’m listening to his book on audible and he’s the one narrating so it’s even more cringing. I find it very disturbing how everything is compared to mummie or because of mummie or for mummie every other paragraph it seems.
He’s using mummie to generate income for himself. He is disgusted by her in reality.
@@emmyjb Yes! The way he actually hates her now is so obvious to me. As a full blown narc though, he hates her because she "left" him, and he had to share her with Will and the world. For all this I love my Mum shite, he does not love her at all. The way he has revealed his true nature is what the world is finding so awful.
@@ketaleigh6772 I believe he’s a narc! And that he suffers from Oedipus complex. He disgusts me.
On two occasions - I was in a situation where it was only a miracle I didn't die. Both times - the last thing that went through my head was - this is how I die. A strange calmness did come over. Once was a assault.the second a car accident. It's his seething anger that surprises me - getting worse because it's nourishment for Meg
Brilliant, I can feel it, especially when he is confronted- dear heavens, who admits to identifying with Stewy…
Andrew, I gotta say that I love these videos. You are all fired up and definitely seem to enjoy it. Brilliant!
I've enjoyed these "Horrifying Harry" presentations so much! The question I'm asking myself is: "how much craziness was he born with and how much lunacy is the result of his upbringing?" Nevertheless, these little vignettes of his really stretch my credulity. He IS an unreliable narrator.
Yes and no is he an unreliable narrator. There's enough on the outside that can be verified to be false. But Harry also give this view into his psyche and can't really obfuscate what's there.
Sometimes I wonder whether Moehringer is trying to warn us. Because why else would he want to be associated with this book?
Maybe the author like portrait painters wanted us to see the real Harry.
A lack of core identity/sense of self was the first (and most predominant) facet of Harry's persona my intuition picked up on as well... *(EDIT:* I haven't read the book, nor have I watched the Netflix series; this is all based upon interviews, book reviews/summaries, and RUclips commentaries that analyze body language, psychology, etc...) Imo, he seems adrift, with quite a warped interpretation of reality (and little self awareness).
This was fantastic! Thank you so much for your insights! 🙏
The whole world domination is definitely in his blood! 🤣 I really wondered about his psychopathy as well when he so casually wrote about having his father bombed. It all really makes sense. Thank you. This was very interesting.
Yes!!!!! I had to go back two min and replay that on audible because I thought I heard that part wrong . I think that part has to be a lie like there’s no way that would have been possible. Then at last min he calls it off and it hits a barn ?
@@summertimesunshine2444I didn’t buy the book but this part was in the news. Even if he would have though that, it should be in the book.
What’s evident is that he never learnt anything from his mistakes and he made many.
But what do drug addicts do? They lie, steal, and cheat. The universe evolves around them.
When he was good, he was very good, when he was bad he was horrid.
Maybe Harry is a bit of both, but leaning more towards sociopath.
Oh, poor poor Harry not being. hugged. His mother seemed to hug her kids alot. Chuck, he was brought up without an empathetic parent. The royal family is devoid of compassion unless faking it in public. Even then it's so obviously fake and their awkward uncomfortableness is weird to witness. When queenie bowed as Princess Dian's coffin passed her, she clearly was just a stunt. That family is all about appearances and keeping the royal grift going no matter who it hurts. As long it's not related to them.
So, Harry kills bunnies for no reason. I believe that.
Just the fact that he wrote about taunting a disabled teacher (maybe she was uncaring, maybe she wasn't--there is no proof anything in Harry's book is the truth.) and still finding it funny at almost 40 years old. That say so much about his maturity and lack of empathy and regrets.
The book is all over the place. There seems to no cohesion. He seems to want sympathy because of how he never got hugs, and his brother didn't want to hang out with him at an elite boarding school (most older siblings don't no matter their wealth.), etc. , then the next thing he's killing bunnies just because there are alot on CASTLE GROUNDS, and teasing a disabled teacher and finding it still amusing as a middle aged man-baby.
Ultimately, what was writing this book supposed to give him? What gains did he want besides lots of money? It sounds like the book is really showing what a truly ignorant, unintelligent, immature, complainer he is, while MEgz puts in things that shouldn't even be in the book. It's so incongruous that listening to your take on parts of the book I'm left with a headache and even more contempt for Harry and MEgz.
I feel you are right on👍👍 with Harry's Psychopathy. There are too many examples in the book in Harry's life that illustrate pathological tendencies!
Who are these 'arm chair psychologist's and ' stiff upper lip' people who not only seem to have no compassion , but also make sta tements of rank racism. I was born into colonialism and lived in England for awhile and have come to understand the subletyor not so subtle effects of racism and hypocrisy of the monarchy and the English in general!
It almost seems that only the English natives have commented,since all comments have the same theme and thread.
Everyone has the right to make his own choices and though that choice may not be yours,it should be respected.
None of us has walked in their shoes and it's my opinion that you should respect peoples ' feelings and responses to whatever circumstances and experiences they encountered and mind your own business. Not t ry to demeanor denigratr
Harry's psychpathy is nothing compared to his yacht girl's narcissism.
It wouldn't surprise me if the armed forces were full of psychopaths. It would help in that profession!
I’m utterly fascinated by your analysis! I think you’re perfectly right! Being interested in narcism, psychopathy, sociopathology and other personal disorders myself I’ve never did connect the points like you did. Now that you did it - yes, of course. He’s a psychopath. Cudos Andrew! 🌺
Honestly I don't believe the stag story one bit. I think it's more likely Harry came up with a story like that to write something sensational and shocking. After all he probably had to get to a certain number of words. It certainly sounds like something his mind would come up with.
I don't believe it either. Sandy would risk severe repercussions if anything would have happened to Harry. The prince passing out wouldn't look too good. But I can imagine such a memory being formed after a hallucinogenic drug.
@salexo9. Well
Said. I think he and his handlers made the stag story up to portray him as a fearless warrior.
Except that Harry said his first draft was twice as long and the editors cut half of it, so he did have PLENTY more stories to tell. Let's hope he doesn't write another though!
You are blooded after a fox is killed and it’s your first hunt. That used to be the custom.
Just found you a few days ago Love your channel. There is a clip circulating out there. I believe it is of PC, PD PW and PH when they stayed with royalty in Spain. Harry is holding a dog. The dog looked like he was fine, but PW came over and took the dog from PH and gently put it on the ground. Maybe PW knew how PH was around animals. Since I am not a Dr. either, I just don't know about how to diagnose, but I do now believe that the Firm was very good at trying to shape PH's public persona. My opinion of him is very much changed.
Oh, this is good. I hope it's sociopath, psychopath would be horrible.
I taught school for 15 years, Identified one psychopath to my own satisfaction--cruelty to animals was the key.
Is there any hope for either of these conditions? Harry seems oblivious to the needs of his own family.
Like the others have said, a very unique list of observations! I loved all your creative, visual details that you put together to display this list. Very professional looking and entertaining.
❤
Thankyou always Andrew and Juls for getting the point out regardless of the challenges of presenting. It seems to be a balancing game . Keep going! Love your content
🇺🇸 Thank you for this. I just "found" you and you are a great source of calm wisdom. I had heard a couple of times that when H loses a polo match he beats his horse until it bleeds. Hadn't heard the other incident w/his horse. Surely by now we all recognize that someone who abuses an animal is only a step away from harming a human.
I've thought for some time H is a man without honor and thought he was a Narcissistic Sociopath. Now, after hearing this from you, I'm convinced he's a Narcissistic Psychopath. And still totally devoid of honor.
The mocking incident, put in his book, as a grown man looking back without abject shame or "lesson learned" spin, is the tell that he is a sociopath and malignant narcissist. His ghost writer either hates him or is also a sociopath because this is the defining moment in the book of what this baby man is, was, and "has become".
Keep in mind that Harry doesn’t talk as it is written in this book. Also he doesn’t have any insight.
I’m not a psychiatrist. From what I see he’s a sociopath with psychopathic tendencies such as taunting and hunting animals.
His rage (the red mist mentioned) is getting out of control. He seems to primarily take it out on the ladies of the night and his polo ponies, as far as we know.
He always had a mean streak. Diana asked William to keep an eye on him, which was not really fair to William. There are videos when Harry was maybe 4 or 5, where out of the blue he kicks William. Numerous stories, pictures, videos of his aggressive behavior. BP always covered up for him. I doubt it anybody ever said no to him. Well the Queen did when she said not half in. And we all know what happened afterwards. He’s vindictive, dim and mean.
The longtime drug use hasn’t helped either. Meghan opened the floodgates.
As a survivor of narcissistic abuse I woke up at 49 to wot these people of phsicopathy r I personally think she is a narcissist an he is codependent and his loss of his true connection to the self is his trauma he’s to afraid to face so his wife is his mother this wil end badly for harry an wil probably painfuly learn the hard way like al of us in life but wen uv lossed that true connection to the self u attack vulnerability cause U to afraid to face ya own vulnerability very sad his childhood taught him like me to hide your true self cause U won’t b loved if u don’t behave how we want u to
HG Tudor says Harry is an empath whose empathic traits have been eroded by his handler, the manipulative Markle. He says this allows his narcissistic traits (which we all have) to come to the fore. Because he is not that bright, he does not realize he is in sustained devaluation, and he has bought everything she is selling him about how his family, the institution and the press are all terrible. But here, Andrew, you look at his early years and it is hard to think he had much empathy with all the antics. He seemed to be running completely wild. I think maybe oppositional defiant disorder.
He murdered a little female polo pony that was pregnant. He was warned not to ride her as it would harm her. He wanted her, insisted on riding her because “she was small and he could move around the polo field quicker on her.” She died immediately after he dismounted her, ad did the little baby pony inside her.
Abhorrent behaviour on his part. The more I know about him, the more I dislike him...... & his wife.
Your not wrong mate. Revealed himself to be a total sociopath. "the firm" actually protected him all this time. It's fascinating in that it's so public, with so much footage.
Absolutely BRILLIANT work here Andrew. I wish there was a love button. Excellent work!!
Thank you so much 😀
That's a strong 5 Andrew 💪.. Well done 👊✌️😉
Harry is truly sick. I used to think Harry was MM’s victim but his narcissism over the past 2 years has caused me to realise they deserve each other. 🇦🇺
Dont forget how he tortured his polo pony. And that Eugenie had the same physical deformity as the lady at Harry’s school, but Eugenie was lucky enough to have an op.
So fascinating. #5 was so interesting! I've often wondered why he ever left the military but recently read/heard that he couldn't pass the test or requirement to be advanced to the next rank. He's tragic but I still don't like him.
I have to admit, I highly doubt anyone shoved his head into a dead stags belly. You’d be taught respect of the animal not desecrating it’s corpse. Maybe I’m wrong. Another lie?
Ok hear me out. There’s a story about Harry as an older child at school. William and Harry were called in for discipline because that weekend at home a chicken died. The story goes William tried to cover Harry said you mean the chicken I killed at Pa’s? It’s in a book don’t know if true but yeah killing animals like that is bad. I’ve worked in container classrooms where we couldn’t have animals.
Very interesting analysis, thank you.
I take it Harry has a gun license in the UK, as he has also admitted to taking drugs, and doing so during " shooting weekends", shouldn't the police be investigating whether he is fit to hold a gun license?
Yes.I said earlier the Diana
was also psychopath.
She was sadistic since age 7
She said she enjoyed making her stepmother furious amd miserable. Flushing her engagement ring down the toilet, putting pins in her cushions chairs and more...
Harry enhereted this from Diana. Diana also was disrespectful to Charles in pubic engagements, she was going ahead at first shaking hands with people.
Charles was nobody next to her.Just like Meghan , pushes her husband to her back and goes first
So please stop patronizing Diana, she was no Saint.
Very manipulative.
Apple doesn’t fall far from the tree. Diana and Meghan have one thing in common. None of them had the ability to see their raise to global fame was because of their husbands. They took all the credit and tried to outrun them. Harry also doesn’t see his only currency is his relation to the Royal family. He really has a prophet complex kind of like his mother and Meghan.
I think it has been said far Diana had borderline personality disorder. Which means there’s psychotic episodes, but then at her core she’s empathetic.
No
@@Love_all_the_tea she was very manipulative. She stop eating starving herself to a stage of bulimia and refused to go to doctors , not thinking of her
children , what will happen to them when she dies. That is not love for the children .
She was publicly showing affection to the kids only to manipulate the media and public.That is what meghan does right now.
She also play the victim in her " it was 3 of us in.this marriage " interview but not mention her own behavior in this marriage by having 3 different lovers from the courtyard herself.
It was not 3 of us in this marriage, it was 6 including your owns boyfriends Diana.
She created that fake facade
being kind and caring, but she genuinely was not.
@@adamgosh2017 I’m not denying her manipulative traits. But being manipulative isn’t the same thing as psychopathy. She had a true empathetic side to her nature. If you explore borderline personality disorder, it has those elements, but the person does truly feel bad about what they did. Psychopathy/narcissism is incapable of feeling empathy or guilt. Diana had failings to her personality, but she also had virtues, including empathy and guilt.
I'm enjoying your take on H's book. Had he not 'written' it, people might've been inclined (someday, sans M) to forgive him if the old, fun-loving Harry returned - the image presumably created by the Palace. Guess that guy never existed. I always try to remember that someone else is taking his words and massaging them into book form - he may only be a psychopath light 🤷. Also, did Stewie not want his mother dead in the infancy of the show? I may be misremembering (I hope I am).
It's interesting that our minds were running parallel on this, Andrew.
After watching Shaun Attwood's interview with Meghan's sister the other day, I googled Prince Harry's age when his mother died. He was 12.
I've learned that, in order to fall into the middle of the Cluster B spectrum of personality disorders, which is narcissism (with psychopathy/sociopathy a little further along that spectrum), one must suffer a significant trauma around age 7 and not receive the appropriate nurturing to move past it in a healthy way.
The age can vary to some degree -- and I doubt he had enough support or nurturing after his mother died. After all, Princess Diana had become a sort of thorn in the royal family's side, and his father was already with his mistress.
I wasn't sure what to think about it because Prince Harry's relationship with his wife -- who certainly does appear to be a narcissist -- seems amicable enough. Maybe two narcissists can get along? (I'm thinking Sam Vaknin and his "buddy" Richard Grannon. They both seem to benefit from their relationship with each other.)
But you raised some interesting points, like Harry relating to Stewey on Family Ties.
I bought a home with a seemingly narcissistic partner who also related to Stewie.
Considering the above, Harry may well be a narcissist at minimum. Narcissists will gaslight and pick on anyone for any reason, including teachers, and are total and complete control freaks, which relates to world dominance.
I'm not sure we can go so far as to say he's a psychopath but it does seem likely he falls on that spectrum.
Very interesting, indeed.
I feel for Harry, or at least I used too. I always got the feeling he resented being a royal - why would he behave so badly knowing that it would inevitably get exposed? Now here he is exposing himself as a terrible little shit! It sounds like he was a bully at school. Then he wears a Nazi unfirm and blames his decision on not being more educated on WWII, huh? Then he trusts a bunch of complete strangers in Las Vegas and plays strip-pool and is surprised photos are leaked. He doesn't seem very bright, that is ultimately his problem. I wasn't surprised when he left the royal family and I was happy for him and Meghan. I wish they would move on with their lives.
Andrew-one of your BEST podcasts. Since I have a kid with similar issues-you are 100%correct.
I wonder if this is why QE2 (& Diana) kept a close eye on him all these years (and without therapy and an absentee father). Perhaps knowing, notwithstanding all the historical medical ailments in the RF across the centuries, there may have been something a bit more concerning about him, that may have been accelerated by his mother's death. These types of horrible traumas can play a massive role in burgeoning some negative traits that may have either not been scene, recognized or fully understood for what they are. Then add in an equally (or worse) disturbed partner who would only nurture these behaviors and ideologies for their own gain and henceforth, an unthinkable explosion of public exploits now on for all to witness. Worth noting from the DSM-V-Cluster B section, Psychos/Socios have narcissistic components but not all toxic narcs have psycho/socio traits. Narcs are actually considered more dangerous that the ones.
Harry is so immature IMO....He was abusing drugs at a critical adolescent time in his life and its possible has done damage to his development. He is so arrogant and won't talk any accountability for his actions...Megan is his puppet master and will drop him like a hot bun, when she has what she wants. I honestly think, she is bored of him already and is planning her next victim.... Regards from Ireland 🇮🇪
Harry sounds sadistic, much like his uncle, Andy