American Revolution Debunked by Curtis Yarvin (Mencius Moldbug)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 24 май 2024
- ➡️ To join my Discord server, request an invitation at theotherlifenow.com/join/ More below👇👇👇
➡️ I publish a free weekly newsletter about independent intellectuals on the internet. theotherlifenow.com/newsletter/
➡️ Big thanks to my patrons who help me keep the lights on. Consider becoming one! / jmrphy
![How Sweet - NewJeans ニュージーンズ 뉴진스 [Music Bank] | KBS WORLD TV 240524](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UEELqlGOl_k/mqdefault.jpg)
"A Nation is a group of people who have agreed to forget something in common."
Rene Girard
That doesn't make any sense
@@bellatordei3440 make sense of it then
@@bellatordei3440 rephrased, a society or culture can be defined by the lies we collectively decide to tell ourselves
not sure if i agree, but it’s an interesting thought
@@HauntedHarmonics stupidity
Daniel Radcliffe's let himself go.
You missed the opportunity to call Curtis Yarvin "Daniel Fatcliffe" ...
Curtis puts the “rad” in Radcliffe.
I would gladly pay per view Daniel getting the Isil treatment rather than losing Mencius
She's talking about justin
@@therandomthoughtsofaninsig5492 no she isn’t sir
As my philosophy on politics has slowly shifted over the years I barely agree with Moldbug on anything that used to, but one thing that'll I'll always credit him with is introducing me questioning certain historical narratives.
Obv faked & forced
@@FordExplorer-rm6ew Obviously dumb and paranoid
@@alexlang235 omg if that's a joke its hilarious, if not its pathetic.
Alex Lang Please tell me your trolling 😂
@@alexlang235 I would like to thank BreadTube, especially Shaun, for making me far more right wing than ever.
Americans are just Englishmen left to themselves. split along much same lines
With a few Germans, Irish and Italians sprinkled in for good measure
@@Confucius_76 How much is this true today? Whites by that definition are no longer the majority.
@@Confucius_76What do you think a majority is?
He talked a lot but didn’t say much and certainly didn’t debunk anything. Catholics have always known who wrote the history books and how it was changed. Oh what’s that? Never heard of Charles Carroll? well obviously that’s because he was Catholic.
What's the matter Catholic or not
Wasn’t he on MDE with Sam Hyde?
I don't trust people who are pro monarchy today how they promote it for America it could be a deception.
ruclips.net/video/Ytw3VQ5kDfU/видео.html
@@matrixlone yea it’s a LARP
I just found this guy and I don't know how it's taken so long!
‘American Revolution Close to Debunked but then Meandered off Point and Failing to Flesh out Motives of Players involved.’ But sure, it’s true - people are people and always have been. It’s silly to think any part of history, recent or ancient as plain good guys v bad guys.
He's not as great of a speaker as he is a writer.
blame the state um um uh um um uh you know um
I don't trust people who are pro monarchy today how they promote it for America it could be a deception.
ruclips.net/video/Ytw3VQ5kDfU/видео.html
Curtis is like a serious Sam Hyde but just as edgy and scathing.
wtf
Sam Hyde isn't serious at all. Read the lolcow threads.
@@lucasottens8506 re-read OP
Cool ideas
wish he had more content on here
Moldbug is king 👑
Relative to?
@@MR-G-Rod Based on?
@@Amfortas You gave your self away; It's all about the Nietzschean will to power is fundamentally what you are saying.
Don't you know God is not dead because God is uncreated, meaning God is beyond our understanding.
@@MR-G-Rod Go outside bro.
@@Amfortas ok w/e you're right I'm wrong.
DEBOONKED. nothing was deboonked
Yes!
If someone could edit out the 'um's I'd listen even more intently to Mencius.
its not that bad
Keep the um’s
It’s his power ups to salient points. You don’t appreciate it, get out and stop terkin our jerbs
There should be an AI tool to identify it and remove seamlessly.
NOOOOOOO. COFFEE WITHOUT CREAM!?!?!?!
Be honest ...
How many times did you think the can would fall off the chair
Dude uses a lot of words to say nothing... only like 10 mins tho.
um um um um um um um
LOL, He said Machiavellian = realistic. This guy is either a charlatan or just a contrarian to the current thing. Everything he said was conjecture towards history based on 1 book. Then out of the blue says a very Truthful statement at the end that understanding both sides is critical. WAHHH
cant believe any man who rolls his jeans like a woman...
Lol what a d bag! "Founding fathers, based or cringe? Audible smirk"
He has interesting idea's, but I'm with you on the jean rolling thing.
@@sgeorge3167 his ideas suck ass. They are so naive and smug at the same time. Every part of his little coup plan is so absurd, it’s almost like he has no understanding of global economics, American politics and culture, or history for that matter. He wants to early retire all 2 mil federal employees and then hire 2 mil loyal goobers in their place, and thinks the federal reserve can be man handled at will by the gov, and that one of his loyal goobers will figure out how to use the fed to pay for this. The global economy would shit the bed immediately. He wants to wipe out all state and local gov and LE, which would send us back to the dark ages. There would no law, no order, no societal norms or institutions. He thinks the fbi, cia, nsa, the pentagon, and nation guard will just stand down, or follow his dictators commands. The man is god damn rube!
He is the mega universe brain centrist meme come to life.
Brits was americans and sheet
2:11 Are the founding fathers based on cringe?
Someone who asks that question cannot understand that the founding fathers were protestant. You would have to know that Christianity came from the Greek seeking Constantinople to the Latin speaking Rome where the Roman Catholics wanted to have an infallible pope against it's Christian roots which in Constantinople, known as the second Jerusalem.
The founding fathers were protestant.
based OR cringe. essentially asking if they were right or wrong to revolt against the crown.
Lol based on
Don't care. It's our story, and everybody's got to have one.
"Don't care if USSR killed millions of people. Its our story and everyone's gotta have one."
I would have thought he’d know where to use the terms England and Britain correctly.
Earth is England.🌍
Britain has been referred to as England for the majority of history
@@iluvmusicqwe It has often happened, and it is completely erroneous. It is akin to referrring to the USA as Kentucky when discussing the nations historical narrative. No educated person would do this.
@@nomoresunforever3695 If you knew anything about the modern UK you would know it’s all irrelevant.
@@nomoresunforever3695 Yet, I must stress, it shows a deep lack of misunderstanding on the part of this nerd who is supposed to know it all that he can’t differentiate. Considering Scotland had just properly been absorbed as the empires first colony, Its important.
Debunk or identify the "real history," what have you: the Bill of rights was/is the pinnacle of humanity. Nothing else matters and this person can meander on as he likes.
It's a piece of paper. Give me a call when the government - or even the people - decide to read it.
@@Groobl Could be worse. You could be Australia right now without that "Piece of Paper."
@@seppukusushi2848 They have a piece of paper too, you know. Didn't help much.
@@Groobl Eh, not sure about that. Gave up their guns, and Australian politics have always been Gay.
Bill of Rights opens up the possibility that the listed rights are up to government legislative process.
Which is how most people take it nowadays. Original intention was "hey gov't here are all the things you can't touch", now its like "while hur dur fire in a crowded theater rights aren't absolute mkay" (nope, they are absolute)
A very naive and skewed perception of history... The word "Democracy" appears nowhere in The Constitution.
Article IV Section 4 does say the Federal Government should "Guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government.
"In a democracy, two wolves and a sheep take a majority vote on what’s for supper, while in a Constitutional Republic, the wolves are forbidden to vote on what’s for supper, and the sheep are well armed." - Benjamin Franklin
“Democracies, have ever been spectacles of turbulence and contention; have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have in general been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their death.” - James Madison
"A democracy is nothing more than mob rule, where fifty-one percent of the people may take away the rights of the other forty-nine." -Thomas Jefferson
"Democracy... while it lasts is more bloody than either aristocracy or monarchy. Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There is never a democracy that did not commit suicide." - John Adams
"We are now forming a Republican form of government. Real liberty is not found in the extremes of democracy, but in moderate governments. If we incline too much to democracy we shall soon shoot into a monarchy, or some other form of a dictatorship."4 Hamilton, in the last letter he ever wrote, warned that "our real disease…is DEMOCRACY." - Alexander Hamilton
He’s talking about Aristotelian definition of democracy
A constitutional Republic is a democracy. Just like Fascism and Communism are under the dictator umbrella. As someone who up until this last year identified as a Conservative Republican who bled red white and blue. Our Country is an oligarchy. A complete utter failure.
Wait until your caught In the gears of a bureaucratic machine like the judicial system here. They do not care or work for us.
@@AustinfromNashville No, it isn't, it's a Republic, period.. Or the word would be in the nation's founding documents, which again it isn't..
@@AustinfromNashville once you see it you unfortunately can’t unsee it. I’m in the same boat as you.
@@MrSparkums You may not call it a Republic, but men of the 18th Century did. You can call a dog a cat; still a dog. Just like we were in a recession this year. For the first time in literally ever; they changed the definition of a rescission. I know what you are saying, but the fact remains; we line under a guise of "Republic" The truth is this is 100% an Oligarchy. When numerous data and surveys are finding the same conclusion that our "democratic" officials are serving the 10% and not.. you know.... the people. Democracy takes a fat L.
I don’t understand the issue with presenting history so that it is useful to the reader of it. We tell the stories of leaders and inventors and thinkers primarily because we view them as having shaped history, we tell the stories of groups or factions of people as well. We do not tell the story of a single hydrogen atom throughout that same period. There is so much information that we could include but don’t so obviously what we do tell must be planned with some utility in mind.
Presenting history so that it advances your new ideology creates revisionism, but there’s nothing wrong with a country telling its own history as a means of justifying its existence.
CalvinSomething Only god knows the whole truth.
Also difference between false information and choosing which details to include or leave out. “Lies by omission” is the entirety of human perception: your brain is mostly inhibitory.
How did a colony of Britain defeat the King and the best navy without a boat? Well the Treaty of Paris explains it within the first 2 paragraphs. War? What war? Whose to profit and reserved all mineral and land rights?Who dictated the terms? Who had to pay for the cost of both sides of this "insurrection"? This guy is a joke, the CONstitution was an ultimatum, and the consequences of it's adoption were in fact written about in the various writings of the anti federalists. He should read them, and comprehend why they wrote under pen names. The U.S. was a conglomeration of the trading company's owned by private shareholders and ultimately their creditors[From across the pond] once the debt was defaulted upon. So did we gain independence? Well I think the anti federalist predicted the outcome. By the way, they never were givin the authority to throw out the articles and ADOPT a new contract. We get told our history and believe it. It's time we learn about human nature, and quit being enslaved by it and learn the facts before believing what's told. That goes double for me, I'm an idiot.
You wrote a lot and said nothing in the end.
What's a good source material for what you're taking about? Help us understand..
@@pkop4 read the Treaty of Paris and the Anti Federalist papers for s start. The treaty is short read.
@@pkop4 the ratification debates are also an excellent source
@@nitroshortbus9856 i see you read the right info 😃
glowies push edgy memes that come from think tanks or silicon valley... think moldbug.
I'm not convinced you're fully human.
Isint Moldbug a Monarchist or some shit?
I wonder why.
I've gradually become a monarchist in some ways too. Democracy creates a couple huge problems. It makes it so that there is a constant battle for our minds... but worse than that... the battle for our minds is to weaponize our minds and bodies to wage war on our neighbours to conquer their minds and bodies as well. But probably even worse... I think most people simply do not want to actually be responsible for the decisions of government, which is why we can choose as a nation to constantly be waging war as long as we don't personally have to fight in them (for most of us)... and since we don't want to personally be responsible for government... democratic governments will always be irresponsible. We're better off being commonly oppressed by one dude and collectively hating him and commonly revolting against him at some point... rather than being in the constant grind of oppressing one another.
He’s a monarchist self proclaimed
They always wanted a King, just just the right TYPE of King. Yarv is still schlepping the torch.