*👉Checkout Previous Compilation:* ruclips.net/video/Bnp8utBeyew/видео.html *👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/dMhP9qznKL11NLii6 *👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com
I suspect that a high percentage of all drivers don't practice defensive driving and as a result tend to drive badly. Those with cams merely preserve the event for posterity.
Not necessarily. I've seen these videos for over 10 years. Most incidents I've seen with a cammer shows how much people don't pay attention or proceed to do what they want even if they are wrong. One of the first clips, the white pickup truck was too far ahead for the cammer just to stop in enough time to let the white pickup in forcing them to hit the poles. And most of these incident involving cammers is unpredictable and usually by an aggressive party or someone who isn't paying attention to their surroundings. Defensive driving is key but definitely not majority. Cammers aren't deliberately trying to have an accident or Trying to provoke another driver
But they have a horn and a camera, no need to use the brake pedal, or avoid an accident. They have to prove a point, because they are not “wrong”, only the other drivers are.
The other guy didn't "run the stop sign." He was already half way thru the turn by the time the cammer started turning, who then gunned it to pass him on the right without enough room.
At :55, you can see two cars side by side going in the opposite direction. Not sure if this is a one or two lane road, because I don’t see markings, but either way the SUV has got to maintain their lane after the turn, if it is two lanes. I could see insurance putting the truck at least 50% at fault.
0:42 He didn't force you over, you steered in that direction, the option was yours, you chose the wrong one! Next time go straight, he hits you, he's at fault!
The comment on the clip with the Stop sign runner, saying maybe it would be better to replace such junctions with roundabouts or traffic signals - frankly I've seen enough clips of failing to yield at roundabouts and red-light runners, that it doesn't really matter how an intersection is controlled, there's still some jerk that's going to cause accidents at any of them.
"... frankly I've seen enough clips of failing to yield at roundabouts and red-light runners, that it doesn't really matter how an intersection is controlled, there's still some jerk that's going to cause accidents at any of them." Excapt at a roundabout, it will be a sideswipe collision, not a T-bone or headon, therefore less likely to be fatal. (That is WHY roundabouts are considered safer).
@@JoeWaylo intent is always a challenge to ascertain. Most law enforcement have a hard enough time remembering bylaw much less able to correctly decide what is going through your mind as you violate every law.
haha when I see a vehicle with damage like that white truck had, I definitely try to separate myself... it's almost guaranteed they're going to hit you if they can. As soon as I saw how close he was hugging the left side of the lane I knew he intended to get over so the cammer should have already prepared for it.
Video #24 7:50 Da Siver - get your brakes checked. One of the advantages to ABS brakes is they help you brake in a straight line. If your brakes pull like that you should have them serviced for your own safety. ILR Car Control School
0:28 first of all they didn't "force" you , you could have used that thing called "brakes" and or just stayed in the lane and got hit by them instead of letting them get away while you did damage to your vehicle. 2:48 I will never understand how people just assume nobody is behind them when they reverse.. Does anybody ever check to make sure nobody is behind them anymore?? 7:50 of course the truck thinks cammer is in the wrong and flails his arm out the window like a jack arse.. and still cuts in front of two other vehicles that have THE RIGHT OF WAY.
4:06 I would've stayed until the police arrived and showed them the footage so there wasn't any confusion. The white van clearly is at fault and now they are flip flopping over who is right or wrong when it should've been clear on the accident report.
Totally disagree. While the white Honda Odyssey turned slowly that grey RAV4 had PLENTY of time to react to the obstruction. There is no argument looking at this footage that the minivan legitimately estimated that it had plenty of time to make that turn therefore not causing the crash. If they had the right lawyer, that RAV4 would be paying for that crash themselves.
@@A22DNAL The RAV4 had a green light and the Odyssey failed to yield right of way. By law, the Odyssey is at fault and the cause of the accident. One could argue the RAV4 didn't react fast enough, and the insurance companies may dispute fault by percentage. But the majority, if not all, will fall on the Odyssey by law.
@@americanpatriot2.06 Incorrect. People need to learn what “right-of-way” means. Just B/C the RAV4 has the ROW, it STILL has the obligation to avoid objects that come in its path. That minivan driver could argue it thought it had plenty of time to turn and that RAV doesn’t even try to avoid the now object that has come into its travel path.
@@A22DNAL there’s a very very very good chance the RAV4 was blinded by the canner and whoever else may be behind them to even see the odyssey until it was right in front of them. You’re completely wrong. I think you’re attempting to argue the “Last Clear Chance” rule but that was clearly not the case.
2:46 you kept driving forward for several seconds AFTER they put their reverse lights on. that should be a clue that, hey, they're going to back up, maybe i should stop
0:51 While that person ran a stop sign, the accident was clearly a result of the cammer's aggression, passing on the right while the cammer was getting settled into the lane. The illegal action by the other driver was complete long before the accident, and that car was clearly in front of the cammer before the action the cammer took resulting in the accident.
@@darrennew8211 Actually you can tell he did ran the stop sign. If you watch the side road from the beginning of the clip, the other car is no where near the stop sign at all til the truck was already turning onto that road. So the other car did run the stop sign and never bothered to look at all.
@@angelkilier I would assume you know that when one passes a car, it should be done on the left. In addition, it should be fairly obvious that the best move here is to hang back and let the other guy ahead of him. Yes, what the other guy did was wrong, but so what. He's now in front. Cuss him out and let him go on with his day. But instead this guy was going to make sure, come hell or high water, that he got in front of that guy, and he ended up getting hit as a result.
@@eauhomme You drive in the left lane, I drive in the right. I'm suddenly breaking traffic laws because you drive slower than me? Mind you I wasn't following you and I did not cut in front of you after "passing" you. If there is a collision between us because you clipped my rear tire by turning into my lane, how did I caused the collision?
Don't forget the white truck already is an older model, and has unrepaired damage showing this isn't their first time in an accident. Clues enough to show they are a dangerous driver.
Are you serious? So now we have to be mind readers and enable idiot drivers like the guy in the beat up white pickup. I'd have done the right thing and allowed him to hit my car, instead of swerving.
@@johnt.848 Of course you don't have to enable idiot drivers. You completely at liberty to do the "right thing" and incur the $2000 in damages (from a driver who's likely to be uninsured) and the inconvenience of having it repaired. Or you could recognize that idiots are gonna idiot, back off, and go about your day.
Could have stepped on the brakes. $2K lesson of what happens when you halfway commit. Should have either stood ground and let him hit you or slowed down to let him in.
Video #16 5:30 - that rear wing on that Mustang almost totally blocks the drivers' view out the rear window. It's obviously an aftermarket wing the driver has added. Not only does it block their vision but the angle of that wing would add aerodynamic drag at highway speeds......but he looks cool.... ILR Car Control School
Got to redesign the infrastructure so cars aren't required to get most places first. If you build your whole country around the car don't be surprised when they hand out licenses to everyone.
0:32 Never let someone push you off the road. You end up damaged and they drive off without a scratch. If there's no safe option then hold your lane and lean into your horn. If they continue and hit you it's 100% on them and they get damaged too.
Yeah I've seen a lot of cammers ruin their own cars by trying to avoid somebody coming into your lane. Overreacting, then overcorrecting. I've decided I'm just pitting anybody that comes into my lane. It seems to result in the best outcome for me.
@@awmustang the back up camera has a small field of view compared to the window - especially sideways - and with how fast he was booking it I doubt even the camera and sensors had time to figure out there was oncoming traffic.
@@MrBattlecharge I drive one of these mustangs, with no rear wing or spoiler. The huge pillars on either side of the rear window block a large portion of the side view from the driver's seat, making the view from the backup camera usually better than anything that can be seen through the rear windows. I can't tell if this car has backup sensors, but if it did then yes the car was moving too quickly for them to function properly.
@@MrBattlecharge Many modern cars have reduced visibility, some for design sake, others to make the pillars thick enough to pass crash tests. With the car being as small as it is the driver is close enough to the rear window that you can see all you need to see out the side windows. Also, the Mustang's rear camera has a fairly wide angle view, so if you reverse with due care its fine.
Assuming that's a 2 lane street, how does the cammer "rocket past" the other car cause the collision? The other car while in the left lane, clearly veered into the right lane. The only way the cammer could be at fault, is if there is only one lane.
0:48 if they did not make contact, they did not force you to do anything. You chose the posts to avoid getting hit by the other car. Not a choice I would have made, but still a choice.
@Woah!! The law isn't really relevant. If you don't have a dash cam or witnesses, it's just your word claiming that someone forced you off the road. The police and insurance company could decide you nodded asleep and hit the posts on your own, earning you a reckless driving ticket on top of the damages you suffered. So for the vast majority of drivers (who don't have dash cams), allowing the other car to hit you is in fact the best choice to make since it leaves physical evidence that there was another car which forced you off.
@Woah!! It totally is how the law works. If you veer away and cause your own accident they don't have to stop. If you want to pull yourself out of the ditch and give chase then guess what - you just left the scene of the accident that you are responsible for. Better in that case to let them hit you and there will be no question about fault. The only time you'll be justified in veering away and causing your own accident is in the cases of avoiding a certain fatality which is most definitely not the case in this clip.
& 7:15 Jesse Plummer complains someone got in front of him in the rain and hit their breaks. yet he's doing at least 15 over the 40 mph speed limit in the rain.
In about 90% of these videos; The horn is mightier than the brakes for most of these cammers. But let’s floor the accelerator pedal, as we lay on the horn, and get even closer to the driver who cut us off.
So many of these are avoidable if people just accept that being 'right' isn't a superpower. It doesn't matter a crap if you're 'right', as soon as you fail to avoid an avoidable incident you are wrong.
I hope this video gets better? First three videos now, awful cammers. Third video, good luck explaining to your insurance company that you angrily overtook someone without enough space in the lane and collided.
First clip seems to be another situation of the road layout being the problem. Both lanes seem to shift over and there's no way to say for sure that the Raptor driver was aware of that beforehand (only signage says no left turns).
I live here and it was always been one way around the square. This literally happens every time I drive that street. More than likely the truck wasn’t a local (or just being an ass because they wanted further up in the line when it goes to a one lane) and wouldn’t know the left lane switches to a turn only. Also being a local I know people will do this so you anticipate it.
@@TheSecretLifeofYanina I used to live there. The bigger the pickup truck, the more entitled the driver seems to be. They loved to tailgate me in my subcompact car I had then. Where I live now, it's BMW and Mercedes drivers that are the biggest idiots.
7:00 Dude, when you are doing almost 10 mph over the speed limit in an intersection you can't be serious about accusing others not estimating their time to cross. One of the main reasons for speed limits is this, so others have time to do their maneuvers. BTW, you reaction was nothing impressive, a natural scared person reaction. When I had a similar situation, even though I had a bit over the speed limit almost exact situation as this, I jumped on the brakes, about one car length before entering the intersection and I was stopped another car length into it, obviously with nothing else happening. That I found impressive, not my reaction time, but the fact my car can stop that quickly. If you don't know your skill level and your car limits, better slow down and pay extra attention.
Some of these cammers (as seen in many of these different car channels) should swallow their pride and back off. Is it "morally" right to brake and let an aggressive driver merge unsafely without a blinker? No. But unless you just want a new car or something exciting in your life, just back off and let the crazies go ahead.
8.24 Driver's should always move left 1 or more lanes when a driver enters the freeway. The drivers on the road these days "do not look left" over their shoulders when coming up the acceleration ramp or entering the freeway. So move over, relax, and mitigate your own damages by driving defensively as well as offensively. It's a jungle out there.
That was me, I never mentioned the other vehicle in the left lane and behind me, there wasn't much I could really do defensively. This also wasn't a freeway, it's a main arterial road for a town.
#3 - @ 0:50 - It is crazy how the cammer think that he is in the right. The other party was already into the turn before the cammer started honking. Cammer could have avoided that whole situation by not being an entitled a$$hat!
5:46 "...other driver said the sun didn't let them see incoming traffic." BULLSHIT! The sun is almost directly overhead! Looks to be about around noon.
And even if they aren't lying, that's not a reason to drive blindly into traffic. Would you say "Couldn't see because my eyes were closed, so I pulled out anyway"?
Now that there are other dash cam channels, if this one could just stop posting the cammer commentary, it would greatly improve the clips. Tired of reading why an at fault cammer, wasn’t at fault
Maybe I need to practice my reading skills, but some of those subtitles go by so fast! Might add an additional second or two to them to not make us slow readers feel so bad! :P
honestly these people are pretty stupid, in the beginning clips no way that was 2,000 in damage. probably at most around 1200. Also at 1:00 while he did have the right away, should have just slowed down and stayed behind the car until it was safe to pass witch he definitely could have and avoided that whole situation
Seriously it's amazing how many people send in dashcam videos of them driving just as horribly as the at-fault drivers. First 2-3 clips strike me as avoidable accidents if either cammer were driving defensively
3:46 - #10 - The first rule of motorcycle riding: Keep your head on a swivel and be ready to react and evade as it seems bikes are invisible. Some idiots will look right at you and still pull out, claiming they didn't see you.
Second rule of motorcycles in traffic... NEVER EVER stop in the center of the lane. At best you invite this exact kind of problem/disaster because people just don't look... At worst, you'll be directly between an idiot who's not paying attention and someone already stopped, instant biker-sandwich... People are GOING to cut over too short, run lights and signs, and generally cause mayhem. They can look RIGHT AT YOU and do it anyway... SO at signs and the like GET THE HELL OVER so there's enough room, they can just get by and you'll go on with your day... At the far right, I'm always over and aimed more or less to the gutter/shoulder/ditchline... At the far left, I'm far left and more toward shoulder-ish/median territory... ANYWHERE in between I'm pointed into a lane-filtering position and paying more attention to the rear view than the light/sign and traffic ahead by a slight margin, ready to flash my brake light in hope of getting attention or having a chance at filtering forward rather than getting killed... (even just a little bit) ...AND yes, head's on a swivel 100%. ;o)
It’s scary when you see a clip and know right where it is. That second one by the Mercedes dealership is one of those. That entire patch of highway is a gong show
2. I saw that coming. It’s either speed up or slow down but why wait until you see them speeding up to speed up and then act shocked when they get over? Signal or not it’s way too common to act as if you didn’t know. 🙃 3. Dublin, Hilliard, New Albany, honestly anywhere there’s. Round about this happens again. I just prepare for ignorance bc a horn isn’t gonna stop then.
#1 was Bedford, IN. I know, because of the fresh strip of pavement at J street (which the cammer and the truck crossed), where there used to be a railroad down the middle... plus the town center is pretty recognizable for anyone who has been there. :)
1:15: "Guess she did not hear my honking" I have notice in the last few years that people often ignore honking since I guess that so much narcissism has taken hold that they don't think they could possibly be in the wrong and have someone honk at _them_.
After a collision, drivers are often knocked out of position, or too startled to react right away. The fact that you don't know this must mean you are new here. Welcome to the channel!
#2 That was easily avoided. At the start of your video, he is ahead of you. Both of you are catching up to that red truck in his lane. Do you think he's speeding along just so he can slow down behind the slower red truck? No. Of course not. He's going to cut around that red truck and that means he's moving into your lane. If you didn't want him in front of you then you needed to speed up and get ahead of him before you caught up to the red truck.
@Woah!! It's not about what's legal or illegal. It's about avoiding accidents. if you're in an accident with a totaled car and a broken arm, being legally right isn't going to matter as you squirm there in pain.
That's happened to me before, they find a spot but they've stopped halfway past it, as soon as i see their brake lights I know what's coming next so I stop. I've had to lean on my horn a time or two because despite leaving them room some people have no depth perception and back up way more than they need to almost backing into me.
Disagree, cammer stopped in under 2 seconds, travelling about the width of a parking space. When someone unexpectedly starts reversing in front of you that is a reasonable reaction time.
:35, You have the Idiots License Number, and the Video, turn it over to the Insurance and Police, it's in some states, Attempted Highway Manslaughter.. 4:45, I hope the Idiot in the Dark Gray Car gets a Good Ticket and a Suspended License!! 0 Excuse.👮
The "crowd killer" mustang couldn't see due to having a park bench on its trunk. Unless you constantly drive over 130mph those things actually slow you down from the drag. Plus with street tires it couldn't handle 100mph. Previous car must have been a riced out civic. Stock engine with a 5 inch fart can and plasti-dipped wheels. "V-tech yo!"
Stay far away from any vehicle that looks like the one at 0:40. They clearly don't care about their own car, what makes you think they care about yours?
05:54초 영상 - 조금 양보하면 사고가 나지 않았을텐데......어리석군요..... 02:16초 영상 - 이런 사람 무섭습니다. 너무 정직해서 내가 하는것은 모두 100% 맞고 남이 나와 틀리게 하면 100% 틀리다는 흑백논리를 철저히 지키는 사람......거기에 내가 조금이라도 손해보는것은 철저히 안되는 사람.....
Video around :50, the cammer should've anticipated the black suv not keeping its lane but instead chose to pass on the right and gave opportunity to the accident. A better driver would've yielded a bit until the suv had completed its maneuver. Regardless of the right of way, a wise driver will do what is prudent to avoid a collision.
Once again, 90% of these cammers are rude, inconsiderate, and dangerous drivers. Most of these accidents could have been avoided if the cammers weren’t foul-tempered jackasses. Many of these clips show that the cammer did not thing to avoid the accident, and appeared to be dangerous drivers.
# 15. You are so right. I am amazed many us stop signs don't have huge yellow lines accross the road. 4 way stop signs are a recipe for disaster, and turn right on a red??????
Really? He's only about two feet beyond the stop sign, and the idiot turning left is completely on the wrong side of the street. If you are turning left, you should be completely on the right side of the street you are turning into BEFORE you exit the intersection.
@@spamlessaccount I don't know what you're looking at. After the car passes, he looks to the left and back at the car. Then he turns his head to the right, and when the stop sign comes into view, it is directly to the right of his head.
@@cybore213 Missed that. So he's not COMPLETELY over. On a Honda CBR600 (picked a random representative bike) his head would be almost 5 feet back from the front of the bike - still *well* past. Besides, my main point was that the CAR was the real idiot.
Doesn’t matter, there is no stop line, crosswalk, or sidewalk, therefore you stop at the edge of the road. It doesn’t matter where the sign is placed, so he was actually stopped further back than he had to be.
5:35 There a lot of good cars out there that I can't seem to see myself wanting anymore due to the insane amount of low level individuals found in them. The list grows every day. I can't understand how the dumber they are, the more they can afford. It's a real problem in North America, especially Canada.
Majority of accidents is by idiots who aren't paying attention. I mean sometimes it's so bad, a van rear ended a car that was stopped and the van was at a far distance behind the car they rear ended. A good few seconds in between you can see the van approaching. If you can't pay attention that bad... give up your license. May seem offensive, but I rather have someone's license revoked than have someone moving a 3000lbs object with no regard to others safety
Just for people that post videos saying they probably wont file a claim. Always file a claim especially if they back into you. 2 things: just because your outer bumper doesn't show any damage doesn't mean your car is fine and 2 They can file a claim against you and say you left after hitting them and now you have a hit and run report you have to fight. Any accident needs a police report filed even if the city or county doesn't respond to them. Many cities you just go to the station and fill one out some may even do it online now.
1:04 Good thing you have a rear camera. 2:55 It's a Walmart parking lot. Whaddya want? 3:02 I hate those temporary plates. I never figured out how anyone is supposed to be able to read them.
7:43 - This "idiot" made a mistake of not being able to see around the turning vehicle and going anyway. He immediately slammed on his breaks to avoid an accident. I'd say that was a responsible driver who corrected his mistake before causing an accident. Lighten up dude.
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 194 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/taDT9WTDXhg/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 194 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/tr.png)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 177 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ZTGZV7tdKGM/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 181 [USA & Canada Only]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/UzR45zqlTMU/mqdefault.jpg)
![Idiots In Cars Compilation - 151 [USA & Canada Only]](/img/1.gif)
*👉Checkout Previous Compilation:* ruclips.net/video/Bnp8utBeyew/видео.html
*👉Submit your Dashcam video for the feature:* forms.gle/dMhP9qznKL11NLii6
*👉Or sent to Email:* megadrivingschoolyt@gmail.com
1:41 I'm always impressed (and a bit shocked at this point) by a cammer that can actually admit they were at fault. KUDOS!
I always have more respect for the cammers on here who admit that they make mistakes than the ones who try to blame it on other drivers.
Yeah ''cause sometimes WE are the a--hole.
The majority of cammers who were directly involved in an incident were driving badly and not practicing defensive driving.
A wise man learns from his mistakes.
A genius learns from others mistakes.
Yup. Especially keeping proper distance. Idk why drivers feel the need to be up other asses all the time. No logic.
Couldn't agree more.
I suspect that a high percentage of all drivers don't practice defensive driving and as a result tend to drive badly. Those with cams merely preserve the event for posterity.
Not necessarily. I've seen these videos for over 10 years. Most incidents I've seen with a cammer shows how much people don't pay attention or proceed to do what they want even if they are wrong. One of the first clips, the white pickup truck was too far ahead for the cammer just to stop in enough time to let the white pickup in forcing them to hit the poles. And most of these incident involving cammers is unpredictable and usually by an aggressive party or someone who isn't paying attention to their surroundings. Defensive driving is key but definitely not majority. Cammers aren't deliberately trying to have an accident or Trying to provoke another driver
These cammers are getting more and more entitled. They have turned into the aggressor!
They are. The one just decided to try with to pass with no room just because he was mad.
@@danielb2263 wrong
But they have a horn and a camera, no need to use the brake pedal, or avoid an accident. They have to prove a point, because they are not “wrong”, only the other drivers are.
I saw this channel last week & noticed this immediately. Navigation unfamiliar area happens to everyone
@@danielb2263 you are a loyal sub with road rage 😡
The accident at 1:00 could have easily been avoided. If that is only one lane I think insurance will find the cammer at fault.
Easily avoidable regardless. Plus buddy gunning it with an obviously unsecured load wasn't smart in itself
The other guy didn't "run the stop sign." He was already half way thru the turn by the time the cammer started turning, who then gunned it to pass him on the right without enough room.
@@darrennew8211 But he thinks he had right of way no matter what actually happened
At :55, you can see two cars side by side going in the opposite direction. Not sure if this is a one or two lane road, because I don’t see markings, but either way the SUV has got to maintain their lane after the turn, if it is two lanes.
I could see insurance putting the truck at least 50% at fault.
It’s a two lane road the insurance is going rule him at fault for reckless driving
0:42 He didn't force you over, you steered in that direction, the option was yours, you chose the wrong one! Next time go straight, he hits you, he's at fault!
The comment on the clip with the Stop sign runner, saying maybe it would be better to replace such junctions with roundabouts or traffic signals - frankly I've seen enough clips of failing to yield at roundabouts and red-light runners, that it doesn't really matter how an intersection is controlled, there's still some jerk that's going to cause accidents at any of them.
"... frankly I've seen enough clips of failing to yield at roundabouts and red-light runners, that it doesn't really matter how an intersection is controlled, there's still some jerk that's going to cause accidents at any of them."
Excapt at a roundabout, it will be a sideswipe collision, not a T-bone or headon, therefore less likely to be fatal. (That is WHY roundabouts are considered safer).
Ignore the fact they didn't run a stop sign, they were actually stopped prior to moving.
Failing to stay stopped for all traffic is akin as running a stop sign.
Simple version: " driving with due care and attention and following the rules of the road would be nice."
Save the money on infrastructure.
@@JoeWaylo intent is always a challenge to ascertain. Most law enforcement have a hard enough time remembering bylaw much less able to correctly decide what is going through your mind as you violate every law.
0:30 peak defensive driving skills
haha when I see a vehicle with damage like that white truck had, I definitely try to separate myself... it's almost guaranteed they're going to hit you if they can. As soon as I saw how close he was hugging the left side of the lane I knew he intended to get over so the cammer should have already prepared for it.
Not really. Should have braked instead of trying to defend his turf.
@@spamlessaccount yeah I was being sarcastic, that driver should've reacted way earlier
@@svstem6992 Derp - sorry.
@@spamlessaccount no worries!
Video #24 7:50 Da Siver - get your brakes checked. One of the advantages to ABS brakes is they help you brake in a straight line. If your brakes pull like that you should have them serviced for your own safety. ILR Car Control School
Thought the same thing when he said that.
0:28 first of all they didn't "force" you , you could have used that thing called "brakes" and or just stayed in the lane and got hit by them instead of letting them get away while you did damage to your vehicle.
2:48 I will never understand how people just assume nobody is behind them when they reverse.. Does anybody ever check to make sure nobody is behind them anymore??
7:50 of course the truck thinks cammer is in the wrong and flails his arm out the window like a jack arse.. and still cuts in front of two other vehicles that have THE RIGHT OF WAY.
Still people who don’t know the difference between break & brake. And brake & horn. 😁
I still can't believe how many people would rather break their vehicle instead of brake.
Maybe their brakes broke, so they need a break !
Because they probably uploaded the video during their lunch brake. Duh.
@@IKhanNot Ah gimme a break. ;)
@@mountainmanwannabe9495 brake me off a piece of that kit kat bar. 🤣
8:10 guys like that REALLY burn me up... they "got to beat everyone else" and almost run into a man and his kid.
I hear you but it appears the guy in the white pickup truck was just clueless, rather than aggressive.
Video #4 1:35 - sure is nice to see a "cammer" admitting it was them that made the mistake. Thank you. ILR Car Control School
4:06 I would've stayed until the police arrived and showed them the footage so there wasn't any confusion. The white van clearly is at fault and now they are flip flopping over who is right or wrong when it should've been clear on the accident report.
Totally disagree. While the white Honda Odyssey turned slowly that grey RAV4 had PLENTY of time to react to the obstruction. There is no argument looking at this footage that the minivan legitimately estimated that it had plenty of time to make that turn therefore not causing the crash. If they had the right lawyer, that RAV4 would be paying for that crash themselves.
@@A22DNAL The RAV4 had a green light and the Odyssey failed to yield right of way. By law, the Odyssey is at fault and the cause of the accident. One could argue the RAV4 didn't react fast enough, and the insurance companies may dispute fault by percentage. But the majority, if not all, will fall on the Odyssey by law.
@@americanpatriot2.06 Incorrect. People need to learn what “right-of-way” means. Just B/C the RAV4 has the ROW, it STILL has the obligation to avoid objects that come in its path. That minivan driver could argue it thought it had plenty of time to turn and that RAV doesn’t even try to avoid the now object that has come into its travel path.
@@A22DNAL there’s a very very very good chance the RAV4 was blinded by the canner and whoever else may be behind them to even see the odyssey until it was right in front of them. You’re completely wrong. I think you’re attempting to argue the “Last Clear Chance” rule but that was clearly not the case.
@@A22DNAL you can even HEAR the RAV4 brake before impact. Lol.
2:46 you kept driving forward for several seconds AFTER they put their reverse lights on. that should be a clue that, hey, they're going to back up, maybe i should stop
Nope. Brake lights came on at 2:49, cammer was stopped by 2:51 (about the width of one parking space) that's a normal reaction time.
0:51 While that person ran a stop sign, the accident was clearly a result of the cammer's aggression, passing on the right while the cammer was getting settled into the lane. The illegal action by the other driver was complete long before the accident, and that car was clearly in front of the cammer before the action the cammer took resulting in the accident.
Also, it isn't obvious from the clip that the other car ran the stop sign. He was already on his way thru when the cammer showed up.
Explain "passing on the right"? Just because you drive faster than the car in the left lane, does not make you pass on the right.
@@darrennew8211 Actually you can tell he did ran the stop sign. If you watch the side road from the beginning of the clip, the other car is no where near the stop sign at all til the truck was already turning onto that road. So the other car did run the stop sign and never bothered to look at all.
@@angelkilier I would assume you know that when one passes a car, it should be done on the left. In addition, it should be fairly obvious that the best move here is to hang back and let the other guy ahead of him. Yes, what the other guy did was wrong, but so what. He's now in front. Cuss him out and let him go on with his day. But instead this guy was going to make sure, come hell or high water, that he got in front of that guy, and he ended up getting hit as a result.
@@eauhomme You drive in the left lane, I drive in the right. I'm suddenly breaking traffic laws because you drive slower than me? Mind you I wasn't following you and I did not cut in front of you after "passing" you.
If there is a collision between us because you clipped my rear tire by turning into my lane, how did I caused the collision?
0:38 The cammer saw the intention of the white truck with more than enough time to react and avoid any damages
Don't forget the white truck already is an older model, and has unrepaired damage showing this isn't their first time in an accident. Clues enough to show they are a dangerous driver.
Are you serious?
So now we have to be mind readers and enable idiot drivers like the guy in the beat up white pickup. I'd have done the right thing and allowed him to hit my car, instead of swerving.
just looking at the truck you should notice there was no side mirror meaning the white truck couldnt see the camera. he should have been more caution
@@johnt.848 Of course you don't have to enable idiot drivers. You completely at liberty to do the "right thing" and incur the $2000 in damages (from a driver who's likely to be uninsured) and the inconvenience of having it repaired. Or you could recognize that idiots are gonna idiot, back off, and go about your day.
Could have stepped on the brakes. $2K lesson of what happens when you halfway commit. Should have either stood ground and let him hit you or slowed down to let him in.
Video #16 5:30 - that rear wing on that Mustang almost totally blocks the drivers' view out the rear window. It's obviously an aftermarket wing the driver has added. Not only does it block their vision but the angle of that wing would add aerodynamic drag at highway speeds......but he looks cool.... ILR Car Control School
0:25 judging by the damage on the side of the white pickup, this kind of bad riving isn't new to them.
According to the legendary tri that guy in the F150 must be French.
Absolutely my thoughts. I assume it's habitual for this driver NOT to look over the shoulder before changing lanes.
Yep, definitely not his first rodeo 😆
0:25 - Hitting the brakes instead of the gas would have saved you $2000 in damage
yep I commented the same thing! either use the brakes, or let them hit so they both can have damage to their vehicles.
3:53 I really don’t know why people feel the need to cut corners. Are you really that lazy? Yes.
4:41 “I’m a safe driver ! I never speed!” Also them: My exit !!!
"Crowd Killer".
Hahahahaha!
Love it.
Sad but true...
5:45 - Gotta love their excuse, the sun wouldn't let them see traffic? "I turn now, GOOD LUCK EVERYBODY ELSE!"
I think it's safe to say that overall, it needs to be MUCH harder to get a license here in the US
US? Go watch all the russian car videos on youtube and get back to me LOL
Got to redesign the infrastructure so cars aren't required to get most places first. If you build your whole country around the car don't be surprised when they hand out licenses to everyone.
0:32 Never let someone push you off the road. You end up damaged and they drive off without a scratch. If there's no safe option then hold your lane and lean into your horn. If they continue and hit you it's 100% on them and they get damaged too.
Or, you know, use your brakes.
Yeah when I see trucks like that- I get out-of-the-way. Trucks with that much damage they have literally no fucks to give…
Yeah I've seen a lot of cammers ruin their own cars by trying to avoid somebody coming into your lane. Overreacting, then overcorrecting. I've decided I'm just pitting anybody that comes into my lane. It seems to result in the best outcome for me.
2:30 My man was holding in that rage for so long and just let it out in one go lmao. Don’t blame him
Uh... Anger management much... ?
@@GetTheFOutOfMyWay Get your license, then you’ll understand
Yeah, I could hear the rage from the past few drivers he’d encountered Lol.
Totally understandable.
Smh these submitters are showing them in the wrong and most of these incidents are avoidable but no they on their ego trip
1:00 should be embarrassed to even post this online 🤦🏽♂️ He’d be better of not even having a dashcam…
He did nothing wrong - twice. The other guy ran a stop sign and made an illegal lane change.
@5:30 it's no wonder that Mustang driver couldn't see where they were reversing with that spoiler blocking their entire rear window.
That Mustang has a backup camera from the factory, so it's really just very poor driving.
@@awmustang the back up camera has a small field of view compared to the window - especially sideways - and with how fast he was booking it I doubt even the camera and sensors had time to figure out there was oncoming traffic.
@@MrBattlecharge I drive one of these mustangs, with no rear wing or spoiler. The huge pillars on either side of the rear window block a large portion of the side view from the driver's seat, making the view from the backup camera usually better than anything that can be seen through the rear windows. I can't tell if this car has backup sensors, but if it did then yes the car was moving too quickly for them to function properly.
@@awmustang sounds like the Mustang drivers cannot see to the side backwards regardless. Terrible design.
@@MrBattlecharge Many modern cars have reduced visibility, some for design sake, others to make the pillars thick enough to pass crash tests. With the car being as small as it is the driver is close enough to the rear window that you can see all you need to see out the side windows. Also, the Mustang's rear camera has a fairly wide angle view, so if you reverse with due care its fine.
0:58 Yes they screwed up but you literally hit them when your fragile ass decided to rocket past them lmao
And claim that the other car turned into him which you can clearly see it never turned
Assuming that's a 2 lane street, how does the cammer "rocket past" the other car cause the collision? The other car while in the left lane, clearly veered into the right lane.
The only way the cammer could be at fault, is if there is only one lane.
@@angelkilier it doesn't look like a two lane street
@@angelkilier _"...The only way the cammer could be at fault, is if there is only one lane..."_ There *_is_* only one lane.
7:02 FINALLY someone that doesn’t just blindly fly into the person at fault.
0:48 if they did not make contact, they did not force you to do anything. You chose the posts to avoid getting hit by the other car. Not a choice I would have made, but still a choice.
Another instance of "If you have time for your horn, you have time for your brake."
@Woah!! The law isn't really relevant. If you don't have a dash cam or witnesses, it's just your word claiming that someone forced you off the road. The police and insurance company could decide you nodded asleep and hit the posts on your own, earning you a reckless driving ticket on top of the damages you suffered. So for the vast majority of drivers (who don't have dash cams), allowing the other car to hit you is in fact the best choice to make since it leaves physical evidence that there was another car which forced you off.
@Woah!! It totally is how the law works. If you veer away and cause your own accident they don't have to stop. If you want to pull yourself out of the ditch and give chase then guess what - you just left the scene of the accident that you are responsible for. Better in that case to let them hit you and there will be no question about fault.
The only time you'll be justified in veering away and causing your own accident is in the cases of avoiding a certain fatality which is most definitely not the case in this clip.
@Woah!! Thanks for clarifying, to me your original comment sounded like "I'll swerve away and then I'm gonna come and get you".
& 7:15 Jesse Plummer complains someone got in front of him in the rain and hit their breaks. yet he's doing at least 15 over the 40 mph speed limit in the rain.
In about 90% of these videos; The horn is mightier than the brakes for most of these cammers. But let’s floor the accelerator pedal, as we lay on the horn, and get even closer to the driver who cut us off.
So many of these are avoidable if people just accept that being 'right' isn't a superpower. It doesn't matter a crap if you're 'right', as soon as you fail to avoid an avoidable incident you are wrong.
"being 'right' isn't a superpower"
I love this line 👍
@1:00 even when making a right turn you still have to yield to other traffic then speeding up and swerving into them. i hope your job sees this video
To the cammer in video #7, I feel the same exasperation as you do for all the reasons you stated. It's even more blatant here in California. smh...
I hope this video gets better? First three videos now, awful cammers. Third video, good luck explaining to your insurance company that you angrily overtook someone without enough space in the lane and collided.
7:26 "camera position makes it look like there's more room than there is"
no it doesn't, we can all see how much space is between you two.
3:45 imagine being rick rolled the moment you see the next crash
First clip seems to be another situation of the road layout being the problem. Both lanes seem to shift over and there's no way to say for sure that the Raptor driver was aware of that beforehand (only signage says no left turns).
And if the cammer had common sense - he would have slowed down long before he did. He saw the situation developing and continued on anyway.
I live here and it was always been one way around the square. This literally happens every time I drive that street. More than likely the truck wasn’t a local (or just being an ass because they wanted further up in the line when it goes to a one lane) and wouldn’t know the left lane switches to a turn only. Also being a local I know people will do this so you anticipate it.
@@TheSecretLifeofYanina I used to live there. The bigger the pickup truck, the more entitled the driver seems to be. They loved to tailgate me in my subcompact car I had then. Where I live now, it's BMW and Mercedes drivers that are the biggest idiots.
7:00 Dude, when you are doing almost 10 mph over the speed limit in an intersection you can't be serious about accusing others not estimating their time to cross. One of the main reasons for speed limits is this, so others have time to do their maneuvers.
BTW, you reaction was nothing impressive, a natural scared person reaction. When I had a similar situation, even though I had a bit over the speed limit almost exact situation as this, I jumped on the brakes, about one car length before entering the intersection and I was stopped another car length into it, obviously with nothing else happening. That I found impressive, not my reaction time, but the fact my car can stop that quickly. If you don't know your skill level and your car limits, better slow down and pay extra attention.
interesting how at least half the camers in these vids are atleast partially at fault and get into completely avoidable accidents
5:04 idiot to cross a highway like that, but he obviously knew he was going behind you.
The clip at 5:07 is not from north America. I thought there was only NA videos here???
52 in a 45... Here's an idea... Slow down
Yeah, I'm sure that's what made the truck make an unsafe left...
Some of these cammers (as seen in many of these different car channels) should swallow their pride and back off.
Is it "morally" right to brake and let an aggressive driver merge unsafely without a blinker? No. But unless you just want a new car or something exciting in your life, just back off and let the crazies go ahead.
8.24 Driver's should always move left 1 or more lanes when a driver enters the freeway. The drivers on the road these days "do not look left" over their shoulders when coming up the acceleration ramp or entering the freeway. So move over, relax, and mitigate your own damages by driving defensively as well as offensively. It's a jungle out there.
That was me, I never mentioned the other vehicle in the left lane and behind me, there wasn't much I could really do defensively. This also wasn't a freeway, it's a main arterial road for a town.
For the geniuses that post breaks, they are BRAKES!
5:34 "It was the sun". BS. Look at the shadows.
#3 - @ 0:50 - It is crazy how the cammer think that he is in the right. The other party was already into the turn before the cammer started honking. Cammer could have avoided that whole situation by not being an entitled a$$hat!
Pay a little closer attention to the video.
@The Aussie Family And even after they did, they STILL made an unsafe lane change. Two for the price of one.
1:35 oh shit! Someone taking responsibility...my heart... Elizabeth I'm coming!!
If you drive an invisible vehicle, you have to accept the risk that people can't see you, even if you're in the right and they're in the wrong.
Which vehicles are invisible? For future reference.
@@jimbeam2501 That would be motorcycles and bicycles.
@@fredashay They ate only invisible to blind people.
@@cybore213 You keep telling yourself that when you're in the grave when a driver didn't see you...
@@fredashay I only ride motorcycles off road.
5:46 "...other driver said the sun didn't let them see incoming traffic."
BULLSHIT! The sun is almost directly overhead! Looks to be about around noon.
And they made zero effort to stop and actually look for traffic...just lying through their teeth.
And even if they aren't lying, that's not a reason to drive blindly into traffic. Would you say "Couldn't see because my eyes were closed, so I pulled out anyway"?
Now that there are other dash cam channels, if this one could just stop posting the cammer commentary, it would greatly improve the clips. Tired of reading why an at fault cammer, wasn’t at fault
5:51 I guess now you can replace your windshield.
I'm surprised they haven't gotten a fix it ticket for it. The crack in the windshield is right in their view
5:10 Australia is still a part of North America? Lol
America really is vast and beautiful.
5:34 With a cheese grater like that, anyone would have had a hard time seeing.😉
7:36 I wouldn't call him an idiot, haha! His view was obstructed by the parked car on the outside lane.
If you can't see, don't go.
@@spamlessaccount He made a mistake and fixed it, thus avoiding an accident. Lighten up Francis
@@spamlessaccount durrrr
@@MostDopeBrandon You'd think so, wouldn't you?
I would.
7:03 Fireman would have been clutch had that accident happen 💪
Maybe I need to practice my reading skills, but some of those subtitles go by so fast! Might add an additional second or two to them to not make us slow readers feel so bad! :P
Yeah, I've learned to hit 'Pause' as soon as I see the text appear now.
@@rayh493 same! Lol. Still makes me feel just as dumb though... 🤣
Nice collection of clips. I had trouble reading the inserted captions because they were up for such a short time.
honestly these people are pretty stupid, in the beginning clips no way that was 2,000 in damage. probably at most around 1200. Also at 1:00 while he did have the right away, should have just slowed down and stayed behind the car until it was safe to pass witch he definitely could have and avoided that whole situation
Seriously it's amazing how many people send in dashcam videos of them driving just as horribly as the at-fault drivers. First 2-3 clips strike me as avoidable accidents if either cammer were driving defensively
right OF WAY. Not right AWAY. And yeah that cammer was an over-aggressive douche canoe.
Eh, it's a modern plastic car. I can believe 2 grand in damage. You sneeze at one wrong you've done 4 figures worth of damage to it.
Looks like a company truck. Love the "I don't give a spit" loading.
*right of way *which
"I couldn't see so I went"...
3:46 - #10 - The first rule of motorcycle riding: Keep your head on a swivel and be ready to react and evade as it seems bikes are invisible. Some idiots will look right at you and still pull out, claiming they didn't see you.
Second rule of motorcycles in traffic... NEVER EVER stop in the center of the lane. At best you invite this exact kind of problem/disaster because people just don't look... At worst, you'll be directly between an idiot who's not paying attention and someone already stopped, instant biker-sandwich...
People are GOING to cut over too short, run lights and signs, and generally cause mayhem. They can look RIGHT AT YOU and do it anyway... SO at signs and the like GET THE HELL OVER so there's enough room, they can just get by and you'll go on with your day... At the far right, I'm always over and aimed more or less to the gutter/shoulder/ditchline... At the far left, I'm far left and more toward shoulder-ish/median territory... ANYWHERE in between I'm pointed into a lane-filtering position and paying more attention to the rear view than the light/sign and traffic ahead by a slight margin, ready to flash my brake light in hope of getting attention or having a chance at filtering forward rather than getting killed... (even just a little bit)
...AND yes, head's on a swivel 100%. ;o)
It’s scary when you see a clip and know right where it is. That second one by the Mercedes dealership is one of those. That entire patch of highway is a gong show
That was the first clip for me. I used to live in that town.
5:36 I just started laughing as soon as I read crowd killer😂
Ditto 😆
hey Austin there are no lane markers so it is one lane and passing on the right is illegal
That road is 25 feet wide and you can see the remnants of lane lines. It's obviously two lanes.
2. I saw that coming. It’s either speed up or slow down but why wait until you see them speeding up to speed up and then act shocked when they get over? Signal or not it’s way too common to act as if you didn’t know. 🙃
3. Dublin, Hilliard, New Albany, honestly anywhere there’s. Round about this happens again. I just prepare for ignorance bc a horn isn’t gonna stop then.
#1 was Bedford, IN. I know, because of the fresh strip of pavement at J street (which the cammer and the truck crossed), where there used to be a railroad down the middle... plus the town center is pretty recognizable for anyone who has been there. :)
Yep, I used to live in Bedford and immediately recognized that street as well as the entitlement of pickup truck drivers.
1:15: "Guess she did not hear my honking" I have notice in the last few years that people often ignore honking since I guess that so much narcissism has taken hold that they don't think they could possibly be in the wrong and have someone honk at _them_.
So much narcissism ha taken hold that they could possibly be in the wrong when honking that people ignore them.
Poor Guy almost got a heart attack, you can hear it in his voice
Gotta love how after getting hit, many of these "idiot" drivers just don't get on the brakes to avoid hitting others.
After a collision, drivers are often knocked out of position, or too startled to react right away. The fact that you don't know this must mean you are new here. Welcome to the channel!
#2 That was easily avoided. At the start of your video, he is ahead of you. Both of you are catching up to that red truck in his lane. Do you think he's speeding along just so he can slow down behind the slower red truck? No. Of course not. He's going to cut around that red truck and that means he's moving into your lane. If you didn't want him in front of you then you needed to speed up and get ahead of him before you caught up to the red truck.
@Woah!! It's not about what's legal or illegal. It's about avoiding accidents. if you're in an accident with a totaled car and a broken arm, being legally right isn't going to matter as you squirm there in pain.
2:49 you could clearly see she was backing up and you continued into her anyway. I guess you wanted that spot instead of her.
not to mention she didnt back out of spot like he claimed. it does look like she cut through the parking lot
That's happened to me before, they find a spot but they've stopped halfway past it, as soon as i see their brake lights I know what's coming next so I stop. I've had to lean on my horn a time or two because despite leaving them room some people have no depth perception and back up way more than they need to almost backing into me.
Disagree, cammer stopped in under 2 seconds, travelling about the width of a parking space. When someone unexpectedly starts reversing in front of you that is a reasonable reaction time.
@@rayh493 Going 10 mph in a parking lot you van stop virtually instantaneously. When he saw the reverse lights come on he continued moving forward.
:35, You have the Idiots License Number, and the Video, turn it over to the Insurance and Police, it's in some states, Attempted Highway Manslaughter.. 4:45, I hope the Idiot in the Dark Gray Car gets a Good Ticket and a Suspended License!! 0 Excuse.👮
Man, those KIAs really aren’t that well built 😭😭
Are you serious ? I walked away from that without a scratch. He didn't slow down or brake and hit me full on !
The "crowd killer" mustang couldn't see due to having a park bench on its trunk. Unless you constantly drive over 130mph those things actually slow you down from the drag. Plus with street tires it couldn't handle 100mph. Previous car must have been a riced out civic. Stock engine with a 5 inch fart can and plasti-dipped wheels. "V-tech yo!"
Stay far away from any vehicle that looks like the one at 0:40. They clearly don't care about their own car, what makes you think they care about yours?
Goddammit. You have BRAKES not BREAKS.
If you hit a car your car BREAKS because you didn’t use your BRAKES.
05:54초 영상 - 조금 양보하면 사고가 나지 않았을텐데......어리석군요.....
02:16초 영상 - 이런 사람 무섭습니다. 너무 정직해서 내가 하는것은 모두 100% 맞고 남이 나와 틀리게 하면 100% 틀리다는 흑백논리를 철저히 지키는 사람......거기에 내가 조금이라도 손해보는것은 철저히 안되는 사람.....
2nd video, a truck with all that damage already, you back wayyyy off of someone like that.
Looks like the driver of that truck has been in a few rodeos. I agree- stay away.
This has got to be one of the top 10 reasons road rage exists. Unbelievable driving!
01:25 - Зачем начинать движение, если видишь, что перед тобой раньше вашего движения едет назад авто. Мог бы и подождать, не сахарный, не расстаешь
Video around :50, the cammer should've anticipated the black suv not keeping its lane but instead chose to pass on the right and gave opportunity to the accident. A better driver would've yielded a bit until the suv had completed its maneuver. Regardless of the right of way, a wise driver will do what is prudent to avoid a collision.
Once again, 90% of these cammers are rude, inconsiderate, and dangerous drivers. Most of these accidents could have been avoided if the cammers weren’t foul-tempered jackasses. Many of these clips show that the cammer did not thing to avoid the accident, and appeared to be dangerous drivers.
# 15. You are so right. I am amazed many us stop signs don't have huge yellow lines accross the road. 4 way stop signs are a recipe for disaster, and turn right on a red??????
3:57 technically you were well PAST the stop sign, but the car was still an idiot.
Really? He's only about two feet beyond the stop sign, and the idiot turning left is completely on the wrong side of the street. If you are turning left, you should be completely on the right side of the street you are turning into BEFORE you exit the intersection.
@@cybore213 You can tell when he looks back that he's completely past the stop sign (look a the tar lines)
@@spamlessaccount I don't know what you're looking at. After the car passes, he looks to the left and back at the car. Then he turns his head to the right, and when the stop sign comes into view, it is directly to the right of his head.
@@cybore213 Missed that. So he's not COMPLETELY over. On a Honda CBR600 (picked a random representative bike) his head would be almost 5 feet back from the front of the bike - still *well* past. Besides, my main point was that the CAR was the real idiot.
Doesn’t matter, there is no stop line, crosswalk, or sidewalk, therefore you stop at the edge of the road. It doesn’t matter where the sign is placed, so he was actually stopped further back than he had to be.
Going to steal "Crowd Killer" to describe mustangs now. Especially ones with stupid hockey stick spoilers.
Stop swerving, you might save a life. It's just a car, rolling over is unforgiving, but hitting someone's precious car is no big deal.
5:35 There a lot of good cars out there that I can't seem to see myself wanting anymore due to the insane amount of low level individuals found in them. The list grows every day. I can't understand how the dumber they are, the more they can afford. It's a real problem in North America, especially Canada.
Majority of accidents is by idiots who aren't paying attention. I mean sometimes it's so bad, a van rear ended a car that was stopped and the van was at a far distance behind the car they rear ended. A good few seconds in between you can see the van approaching. If you can't pay attention that bad... give up your license. May seem offensive, but I rather have someone's license revoked than have someone moving a 3000lbs object with no regard to others safety
Just for people that post videos saying they probably wont file a claim. Always file a claim especially if they back into you. 2 things: just because your outer bumper doesn't show any damage doesn't mean your car is fine and 2 They can file a claim against you and say you left after hitting them and now you have a hit and run report you have to fight. Any accident needs a police report filed even if the city or county doesn't respond to them. Many cities you just go to the station and fill one out some may even do it online now.
ARE YOU SERIOUS? Bro you left your lane and hit him.
Guy at 05:25 should simply have pulled into the driveway the Mustang pulled out of... " just to make a K-turn " 😂😂
3:00 Walmart parking lot - not the place to look for exquisite driving. As shown in this clip, one is bad, but the other isn't much brighter either.
1:04 Good thing you have a rear camera.
2:55 It's a Walmart parking lot. Whaddya want?
3:02 I hate those temporary plates. I never figured out how anyone is supposed to be able to read them.
7:43 - This "idiot" made a mistake of not being able to see around the turning vehicle and going anyway. He immediately slammed on his breaks to avoid an accident. I'd say that was a responsible driver who corrected his mistake before causing an accident. Lighten up dude.
brakes!