@2e_Advanced2 the seating arrangements were wrong, they're benches along both sides of the rear, the coax cannot move independently of the main gun, they move together, you switch between the coax and either AP/HE 25mm via a control panel in between the gunner and the TC, there is no communication switch for the driver on the drivers yolk, those are built into your CVC, a helmet that connects to the vehicle for communications, there was some other small things but the ai did in fact get most of it right Source - I am a gunner for a bradley
The "unusually large" door serves as an access point for reloading the TOW launcher. The gunner will manipulate the turret to make the back end of the launcher reachable from this door. The door also offers rear protection, allowing the crew to reload the TOW while shielded from potential threats. As depicted in the illustration, this process eliminates the need for the crew to expose themselves during the reloading process.
You can open the hatch to the "tow load" position which gives the loader good protection and also up in the turret you have the indicator that let's you know when you've got it angled off center enough. Also on the ISU integrated sight unit on top of the turret on the gunners side the doors flip up not to the sides. Also you've the gunner has a circular wheel to traverse the turret manually and another one to manually elevate the gun with a trigger at the end. This allows you to still fire the gun if you lose power or the hydraulics are list. I was a gunner on a Bradley.
there are 6 seats and a space you can squeeze a 7th into. the 6 seats are 2 bench seats along the sides of the troop compartment looking towards the centerline of the vehicle. the 7th dismount spot is shown correctly as it is behind the driver. m2 bradleys still carry extra reloads for the tow launcher by keeping them essentially as back rests for the 6 troops on bench seating but its only single layer deep so it decreases load capacity when compared to m3 CFVs.
7:14 the infantry doesn’t have to exit the vehicle to reload the TOW, the turret can swung slightly left and the infantry can reload it by poking out of the large hatch with a new missile. This can be demonstrated by the Bradley IFV’s promotional film from the 1980s
@@Channel-23s The TOW 2 series are both Wired and wireless (laser guided) if the enemy has laser Dazzler, the wire would still allow it to be controlled, it can be wireless if the wire is somehow snapped (one of the problem for early wired ATGMs)
Great video with excellent animation. However, whoever made this video has never been on a Bradley. Having spent years on the BFV, I feel the need to point out the errors. The pic to the left was taken by me on an M2 ODS. 3:35: Commander's and Gunner's sights are labelled backwards. The video does correct this though 4:32: The trigger fires whatever weapon has been selected; not just the COAX. 4:46: The COAX does not move independently from the main gun. Again, I was on the ODS and not the A3 or A4, but, due to how the weapon trunnion is designed, it just isn't possible. 5:14: That button is not "obviously" the trigger; it's the fast turret switch. The trigger is in the front. 5:20: Again, the trigger fires whatever weapon is selected. not just the main gun. 5:53: The Bradley is NOT a tank! Call it one to a staff sergeant and see what happens. 6:47: The TOW front plate drops due to the lower linkage as can be seen in the illustration/animation, not due to gravity. 7:16: The TOW loading is incorrect. The purpose of the crew hatch is primarily to reload the TOW. The gunner has an azimuth gauge in the turret and traverses to a certain azimuth labelled in the turret. He then elevates to a certain angle and the crew loads from the rear dismount compartment. 8:30: Luggage? Are you kidding me? Why not just bring equipment in through the rear with the ramp down? Luggage? "Private Smith!" "Yes Sergeant?" "Have you loaded the luggage for the mission tomorrow morning?" That's a new one... 9:03: Those are side skirts, not armor. They protect the tracks from bushes and such, and will stop small arms, but they are not armor-plate steel. They are designed to be removed by the crew; armor-plate steel would be WAY too heavy. 10:04: The driver's intercom button is not to speak to the commander. The BFV's communication system allows the crew and squad leader continuous communication. If the driver wants to speak to the TC (Track Commander), he just speaks. The button allows the driver to transmit messages over the radio to other listening stations. It is rare for the driver to transmit over the radio though...
The video looked good, but so much was inaccurate or misinterpreted. They'd do better to run the videos by someone who has some basic experience with it, because they can tell them "hey, that's not right, it's this instead". Like the idea the coax can be used independently of the main gun. The BC can fire it, but it's always moving with the turret itself.
I’ve been on a brad for a few years now and to this day have never seen the button on the driver steering yoke used, still don’t know what it’s for. Only thing I’ve been told is that it’s a last ditch effort button for the driver to override the gun and operate it, never heard it being used to transmit over the radio though, I just used the transmit button on the cvc for that (yes I was allowed to transmit over the radio as a driver, I was a very overqualified driver)
Lol, the tow front plate has a fixed point visible in the graphic. It never moves, the launcher erects from behind it. Bet it would shock them to know you can manually raise the launcher, but it ain't fun
does the tranny still try to bayonet the driver? i know a couple drivers from the 90s who complained about that! they said when an axle broke it was likely to come back into the drivers compartment!
@@PHOBOS1708 The Russians destroyed the Bradley IFV a long time ago and captured the Bradley IFV lol. Trophy "Bradley BMP" in Victory Park (Moscow). Are you a Banderaite?
Nice animation and thanks for taking a look at the Tornado IDS. It‘s my favorite airkraft and I would like to see an animation about it. Big thanks to you guys.
As a cav soldier trained on the Bradley.... so many things wrong here. From the crew arrangement, to having to remove the TOW missles... and Tube launched, Optically tracked, WIRE guided Missile.... it is in the name.
Make videos of: Bradley floating w its water barrier up, & of AAV floating, w its water jets on! I did swim /tested both, in '83-'89, at San Jose Cal's FMC, & it'll bring back good memories! 🤗
The Tow 2B is not a fragmentation warhead, its an EFP warhead. It has several EFPs that are angled downward. When they explode, they send several penetrators all angled at the same spot that are enough to penetrate the thin top armor. The use of multiple penetrators is to break through any ERA bricks that might be on the top of the tank.
Also the 25mm gun has armor piecing and fragmentation rounds, the latter can be set to a fix distance to neutralize infantry targets in trenches or behind cover. The ammunition type can be switched by the controls as the gun has a double feed system. Hopefully with some upgrades this IFV can be modified to target drones.
I wonder if you post a video about a M1128 Stryker and is variants like the M1296 Dragoon equipped with 30mm Bushmaster II Auto cannon, and how its compared to Bradley Fighting Vehicle.
Former 11 Mike, 24th and 3rd I.D among a few others……just here to see how accurate a video and the comments. 🤔 By the way, I’m few 11M who actually had to put up the swim barrier on our Bradley variant ( way before M2A2 variant lol) and swim it across a river during 11 Mike school at Fort Benning. Later went on to Master Gunnery school at Fort Stewart. Just a FYI, I join the Army 3/12/1993.
Actually they disabled the turret it shows it in the video. The Bradley was also unable to use the armor piercing rounds for whatever reason, can’t remember. Regardless the Bradley spanked that t90. Also videos of a Bradley taking out another t90 with a tow missile. Russian tanks have weak armor for today’s standards.
@@andreww1225 not really the Bradley commander himself said that he was using sabot rounds and he couldn't damage the t-90 so he tried to damage the optics on the turret Also there is no evidence or report of a Bradley destroying another t-90 using tows idk maybe you're talking about that one case of a t-80 which was also a rear incident Btw how are russian tanks have weak armor there are several videos in telegram of russian tanks surviving rpg and drone attacks if you're judging based on them getting destroyed in a modern battlefield then don't forget that western armor didn't fare much better either
@@right584 western tanks are much more safe than any Russian tank that’s a fact buddy. You should watch that video again he was unable to continue using armor piercing rounds that’s why it shows him mostly using anti personnel rounds. Russian tanks are coffins, seriously what idiot designed a tank that the crew has to sit on the ammunition. No tank blows up as nicely as a Russian tank.
So what is the other term of disable aside from being limited? t90 maybe thick but slow in both speed and firing. Bradly has the advantage first it is capable of armour penetration and have speed.
The brad in question running against the T90 in question went black on AP rounds. Coming from a former brad driver/gunner and TC he did the right thing by going after optics and turret ring. You can see when the HE rounds started hitting by the splashing and spalling. The AP rounds would do very little which is obvious it isn't meant for tank battles. The HE rounds and the spalling did the damage to the optics and turret mechanism that is very fragile.
It is a common myth that the Bradly is a m113 with a turret, that is wrong. There was a m113 ifv, but it has little to do with the design of the Bradly
Okay, I heard from another military RUclips/ History channel that the T-90 is a modern version of the T-62 or was it the T-72. Could the upgraded bushmaster auto-cannon of a Bradley engage and disable T-62 tanks without relying heavily on the Tow missile?
@@Aitelly - I am aware it's not like buying a car - there is no window sticker. However, my point is,... the last time a AMX-10P or Warrior rolled off an assembly line was 3 decades ago. There is no such thing as current pricing under any circumstances.
I wonder if someday people made an IFV as small as BMPs but with capsule hotel like arrangement. Which can be jettisoned in case of catastrophic damage. Or launched like a VLS system 😂. Nah, jettisoned. By laying the first row to the ground as the vehicle moves forward, lowering the upper rows, then do the same. Each capsule can be opened just like a capsule hotel like to be, and by opening the top lid of the capsule. For a rapid deployment. The bottom side of the capsule have some small struts to absorb the jettisoning impact. And retractable castor wheel to carry the injured. Each capsule has its own bed, and ofc sound proofing. Also doubles as a brig if you want to capture someone. Since it is a bed, technically can also be used as an ambulance. To make some room each capsule can be dismantled. Maybe for an SAM suite, cargo, or bridging. I think it could carry 4 people inside the all the capsules. Maybe 6 if you think soldiers don't have claustrophobia. The capsule itself is unarmored. But the bed carrying them is. It has one driver and one gunner at the front side. Which enters the vehicle like a truck, so, from the side. The vehicle has no top hatch at all. So you don't need an additional roof for an occasional rain of hand grenade.
@@Aitelly on Abrams and Booker, the gunner is always on the right side in front and below the commander, this way it is easier for the loader to pick up rounds and reload. In IFVs or auto-loading tanks like the Bradley, T-90M, Type 90, the gunner sit on the left for more intuitive aiming as reloads are not done by a human loader and the gunner can help the commander if anything is wrong with the autoloader or manually load specialty rounds like ATGMs that is not in the autoloader.
Col. Robert Laurel Smith : But it's a troop carrier, not a tank. Jones : Do you want me to put a sign on it in fifty languages, "I am a troop carrier, not a tank, please don't shoot at me"? Quotes from the movie "The Pentagon Wars."
Close but no cookie. Lot of information here is wrong especially about the gunner and missle information. Still interesting and fun. Luggage loaded through the loading door. 😂😂😂
Not to knit pick but...when reloading the TOW the crewmember doesn't have to climb out on the hull. The turret is oriented to the 10 o'clock and the crew can then reload the TOW from the open hatch.
I just wanted to say I think you might be wrong on the part where you said the Bradley disabled the T-90M, pretty sure it just disabled the turret and the crew escaped. Not a full disable
how fun it is to fantasize with computer graphics)) a formidable barn with cardboard armor) essentially a disposable cardboard box with firecrackers for delivering consumables
I really don't think the Bradley should be so big. I'd honestly go with a limit of 4 soldiers for the standard variant, and a light tank variant with no troop compartment. The standard variant could have a javelin and gustav armed hunter killer team that could support M1 Abrams tanks, and the variant with no troop compartment could be a nice complement to the abrams as compared to the Booker.
Hey guys, so lets discuss about which IFV is the best? In terms of: Technology Capabillities Armor Price In my opinion the Puma and The Namer share the first place Let me know your opinion
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Sign up for a 14-day free trial and enjoy all the amazing features MyHeritage has to offer. bit.ly/AiTelly
Hey aitelly can you make a video on how the solar telescope Aditya L1 works
How can I learn blender
Will you make a video about northrop grumman manta ray
How can I learn blender pls
How can I learn blender pls
Straight to the point and good graphics that's what makes you better than all the other engineering channels
Thank You!
Love the graphics. I was a Bradly Commander, multiple variants. You got most of it correct. Keep up the good work.
high praise from a tank commander
Pretty fly for an A.I.
did u ever be in combat in command of it
@@willmill44 What did he get incorrect?
@2e_Advanced2 the seating arrangements were wrong, they're benches along both sides of the rear, the coax cannot move independently of the main gun, they move together, you switch between the coax and either AP/HE 25mm via a control panel in between the gunner and the TC, there is no communication switch for the driver on the drivers yolk, those are built into your CVC, a helmet that connects to the vehicle for communications, there was some other small things but the ai did in fact get most of it right
Source - I am a gunner for a bradley
Thanks, just bought one but didnt seem to figure how to use it. That orphanage doesnt stand a chance
Glad I could help
@@Aitellylamo 🤣😭💀
Your mother eats pork chops and bacon
@@DeezzzzzzNuts12 Just say your life is going sad........no need to this
@@muhammadusmanrafique3517 your mother loves pork chops
The "unusually large" door serves as an access point for reloading the TOW launcher. The gunner will manipulate the turret to make the back end of the launcher reachable from this door. The door also offers rear protection, allowing the crew to reload the TOW while shielded from potential threats. As depicted in the illustration, this process eliminates the need for the crew to expose themselves during the reloading process.
Noted thanks 👍🏻
As a fellow former Bradley soldier, I concur. The TOW was reloaded from the top hatch, dismounts staying within the vehicle as much as possible.
Crew Cargo Hatch. Fun note - you can open it all the way, put some seat cushions on it and it makes for a sweet ride.
You can open the hatch to the "tow load" position which gives the loader good protection and also up in the turret you have the indicator that let's you know when you've got it angled off center enough. Also on the ISU integrated sight unit on top of the turret on the gunners side the doors flip up not to the sides. Also you've the gunner has a circular wheel to traverse the turret manually and another one to manually elevate the gun with a trigger at the end. This allows you to still fire the gun if you lose power or the hydraulics are list. I was a gunner on a Bradley.
I made a similar comment before scrolling down and seeing your comment. Cheers.
there are 6 seats and a space you can squeeze a 7th into. the 6 seats are 2 bench seats along the sides of the troop compartment looking towards the centerline of the vehicle. the 7th dismount spot is shown correctly as it is behind the driver. m2 bradleys still carry extra reloads for the tow launcher by keeping them essentially as back rests for the 6 troops on bench seating but its only single layer deep so it decreases load capacity when compared to m3 CFVs.
7:14 the infantry doesn’t have to exit the vehicle to reload the TOW, the turret can swung slightly left and the infantry can reload it by poking out of the large hatch with a new missile. This can be demonstrated by the Bradley IFV’s promotional film from the 1980s
Thanks for your feedback 🙏🏻
Can confirm that’s the main reason for the rear top hatch. Not to load anything inside. The ramp would be a better option to load gear and equipment.
0:22 "WIRELESS", meanwhile you can see the wires xD
the TOW-2 uses dual guidance, Wired and Wireless
Fly-by-wire or sumthing
@@ItsA72 Thats entirely different concept
Bunker buster version is wireless and laser guided
@@Channel-23s The TOW 2 series are both Wired and wireless (laser guided)
if the enemy has laser Dazzler, the wire would still allow it to be controlled, it can be wireless if the wire is somehow snapped (one of the problem for early wired ATGMs)
Great video with excellent animation. However, whoever made this video has never been on a Bradley. Having spent years on the BFV, I feel the need to point out the errors. The pic to the left was taken by me on an M2 ODS.
3:35: Commander's and Gunner's sights are labelled backwards. The video does correct this though
4:32: The trigger fires whatever weapon has been selected; not just the COAX.
4:46: The COAX does not move independently from the main gun. Again, I was on the ODS and not the A3 or A4, but, due to how the weapon trunnion is designed, it just isn't possible.
5:14: That button is not "obviously" the trigger; it's the fast turret switch. The trigger is in the front.
5:20: Again, the trigger fires whatever weapon is selected. not just the main gun.
5:53: The Bradley is NOT a tank! Call it one to a staff sergeant and see what happens.
6:47: The TOW front plate drops due to the lower linkage as can be seen in the illustration/animation, not due to gravity.
7:16: The TOW loading is incorrect. The purpose of the crew hatch is primarily to reload the TOW. The gunner has an azimuth gauge in the turret and traverses to a certain azimuth labelled in the turret. He then elevates to a certain angle and the crew loads from the rear dismount compartment.
8:30: Luggage? Are you kidding me? Why not just bring equipment in through the rear with the ramp down? Luggage? "Private Smith!" "Yes Sergeant?" "Have you loaded the luggage for the mission tomorrow morning?" That's a new one...
9:03: Those are side skirts, not armor. They protect the tracks from bushes and such, and will stop small arms, but they are not armor-plate steel. They are designed to be removed by the crew; armor-plate steel would be WAY too heavy.
10:04: The driver's intercom button is not to speak to the commander. The BFV's communication system allows the crew and squad leader continuous communication. If the driver wants to speak to the TC (Track Commander), he just speaks. The button allows the driver to transmit messages over the radio to other listening stations. It is rare for the driver to transmit over the radio though...
The video looked good, but so much was inaccurate or misinterpreted. They'd do better to run the videos by someone who has some basic experience with it, because they can tell them "hey, that's not right, it's this instead". Like the idea the coax can be used independently of the main gun. The BC can fire it, but it's always moving with the turret itself.
I’ve been on a brad for a few years now and to this day have never seen the button on the driver steering yoke used, still don’t know what it’s for. Only thing I’ve been told is that it’s a last ditch effort button for the driver to override the gun and operate it, never heard it being used to transmit over the radio though, I just used the transmit button on the cvc for that (yes I was allowed to transmit over the radio as a driver, I was a very overqualified driver)
Lol, the tow front plate has a fixed point visible in the graphic. It never moves, the launcher erects from behind it. Bet it would shock them to know you can manually raise the launcher, but it ain't fun
@@joehughes5177 Yeah, you have to ratchet that damn thing up and it takes FOREVER...
@@joehughes5177 it’s almost as fun as manually traversing the turret
This is my favorite military vehicle, My grandpa served in one of these before he was dishonorably discharged (no one ever told me why).
Yeaaah
I’m gunner at Bradley! Thanks USA, thanks folks for ur support!
Thanks you for your Service!
does the tranny still try to bayonet the driver? i know a couple drivers from the 90s who complained about that! they said when an axle broke it was likely to come back into the drivers compartment!
don`t make yourself a target for ruzzian OPSEC my friend
@@PHOBOS1708 The Russians destroyed the Bradley IFV a long time ago and captured the Bradley IFV lol. Trophy "Bradley BMP" in Victory Park (Moscow). Are you a Banderaite?
thats really cool man
The tow 2 isn't wireless, it very much has a wire. You can't use it over water if the distance is more then 300m because it will short the wire.
Thank you for this comment, I had believed all my life those things were wireless, that makes so much more sense
Can't wait for more military engineering videos
An episode on BMP-3 is now overdue. Also an episode giving 2-3 minutes for all other IFVs is also due now.
Noted sir
@@Aitelly We viewers will be patiently waiting 😀
@@Aitellyplease make a video on the us paladin mobile howitzer! And the roel it’s played in Ukraine
The *M2A2* Bradley IFV was named after US Army 4 star General ★★★★ *Omar Nelson Bradley* [1893 - 1981]. Who was the first US Joint Chiefs of Staff.
Thanks bro!, cant wait to drive mine😊
😉
Go for it man
Nice animation and thanks for taking a look at the Tornado IDS. It‘s my favorite airkraft and I would like to see an animation about it. Big thanks to you guys.
Noted
As a cav soldier trained on the Bradley.... so many things wrong here. From the crew arrangement, to having to remove the TOW missles... and Tube launched, Optically tracked, WIRE guided Missile.... it is in the name.
He is doing this to deceive Russian IFV engineers
Make videos of: Bradley floating w its water barrier up, & of AAV floating, w its water jets on! I did swim /tested both, in '83-'89, at San Jose Cal's FMC, & it'll bring back good memories! 🤗
The Tow 2B is not a fragmentation warhead, its an EFP warhead. It has several EFPs that are angled downward. When they explode, they send several penetrators all angled at the same spot that are enough to penetrate the thin top armor. The use of multiple penetrators is to break through any ERA bricks that might be on the top of the tank.
a video on the M3 Bradley IFV would be great . . . clearly the next gen IFV needs to be bigger, a lot bigger . . .
Marines didnt operate a bradley because they use AAVs and LAV25. Only the Army uses bradleys as cavalry/infantry fighting vehicle.
Amazing video! I always look foward to them!
Glad you like them!
T.O.W. Tube launched, Optically tracked, Wire guided, command link missile.
I love Bradley ❤️
AMAZING VIDEO 🔥🔥🔥
I feel like you could have given more detail, but to be a general explanation it was very good, explaining all the more major components and features
The russians are surely very glad to have this video on youtube...
@@SilurusDominus it’s public imformation
We want to provide audio translation into Arabic. Thank you for the beautiful content
Amazing video! (I just started watching the video but I know it's gonna be great) and the AI voicing got a lot better too! Great work!
Very interesting especially the TOW missile still being in the inventory
Funny thing is some class mates of my graduating class (the two above me) actually went and built the first prototypes for this and the Abrams.
Bradley is su a good looking vehicle 😎
When are you going to do a bmp-3 video cause the bmp-3 is a very interesting vehicle
Will do for sure we have a small team of only 3 people.
I will hire more script writer next year to Work on Russian Missile
Thanks for listening to the comments and taking your time to keep quality up.
No worries! We listen to you guys but it takes time to plan animated and write script
wow thank you for the tow missile system guide👏👏👏 next time how about the kornet
amazing 3d video
Thanks 🙏🏻
Also the 25mm gun has armor piecing and fragmentation rounds, the latter can be set to a fix distance to neutralize infantry targets in trenches or behind cover. The ammunition type can be switched by the controls as the gun has a double feed system. Hopefully with some upgrades this IFV can be modified to target drones.
it doesn't have programable frag rounds, but it has been discussed for future versions.
Good video mate, thanks for sharing.
Awesome Graphics mate
What platform are you using for animations?
I COULD HAVE LEARNED ALL OF THIS, BUT I DIDNT REUP *
Awesome video, but where is the on button?
how can you do those graphics omg
I wonder if you post a video about a M1128 Stryker and is variants like the M1296 Dragoon equipped with 30mm Bushmaster II Auto cannon, and how its compared to Bradley Fighting Vehicle.
TBH, the most scary thing about the bradly, is its Auto cannon, to think that it can just, make people disappear with a shot, or punch through cover.
Also if it shoots a tank it won’t kill it but it will kill the crews ear drums
nice segway with the advert!
🤦♂️ segue**** Segway is an electric wheeled mobility device
6 independent doors is impressive considering the Bradley size configuration.
Yes
This animation is awesome
To make this animation, what application program do you use?
Please do the Tiger one tank, thank you
Former 11 Mike, 24th and 3rd I.D among a few others……just here to see how accurate a video and the comments. 🤔 By the way, I’m few 11M who actually had to put up the swim barrier on our Bradley variant ( way before M2A2 variant lol) and swim it across a river during 11 Mike school at Fort Benning. Later went on to Master Gunnery school at Fort Stewart. Just a FYI, I join the Army 3/12/1993.
Thanks AiTelly for the impressive video. No wonder the TOW missile wont launch because i have to press that buttons 😂
Please feature an OT-64 SKOT infantry vehicle. It is one of the few, if not the only one, with the engine in the middle.
Noted
I was in one as a cav scout. These things have no breathing room un them. Iron coffin lol. Still one of the best war vehicles though.
I'm still waiting for the T-14 Armata video
The Bradley didn't disable the t-90 they manage to destroy the optics and blind the commander but it was two drones that actually destroyed the tank
Actually they disabled the turret it shows it in the video. The Bradley was also unable to use the armor piercing rounds for whatever reason, can’t remember. Regardless the Bradley spanked that t90. Also videos of a Bradley taking out another t90 with a tow missile. Russian tanks have weak armor for today’s standards.
@@andreww1225 not really the Bradley commander himself said that he was using sabot rounds and he couldn't damage the t-90 so he tried to damage the optics on the turret Also there is no evidence or report of a Bradley destroying another t-90 using tows
idk maybe you're talking about that one case of a t-80 which was also a rear incident
Btw how are russian tanks have weak armor there are several videos in telegram of russian tanks surviving rpg and drone attacks if you're judging based on them getting destroyed in a modern battlefield then don't forget that western armor didn't fare much better either
@@right584 western tanks are much more safe than any Russian tank that’s a fact buddy. You should watch that video again he was unable to continue using armor piercing rounds that’s why it shows him mostly using anti personnel rounds. Russian tanks are coffins, seriously what idiot designed a tank that the crew has to sit on the ammunition. No tank blows up as nicely as a Russian tank.
So what is the other term of disable aside from being limited? t90 maybe thick but slow in both speed and firing. Bradly has the advantage first it is capable of armour penetration and have speed.
The brad in question running against the T90 in question went black on AP rounds. Coming from a former brad driver/gunner and TC he did the right thing by going after optics and turret ring. You can see when the HE rounds started hitting by the splashing and spalling. The AP rounds would do very little which is obvious it isn't meant for tank battles. The HE rounds and the spalling did the damage to the optics and turret mechanism that is very fragile.
just read an article in WSJ about how Ukrainian soldiers really love their Bradleys. Decades old but still proving its worth in the battlefield
It is a common myth that the Bradly is a m113 with a turret, that is wrong. There was a m113 ifv, but it has little to do with the design of the Bradly
Is this California compliant?
Nice video❤
Glad you liked it!
Drove one of these in the Army. My training consisted of "Hey you're driving the Bradley back to the motorpool."
Never heard of marines using Bradley's and the variant with the extra tow missiles that is the Cavalry variant
I love the Bradley. But I've yet to see ANYONE make a full 3d review of the army Stryker IFV.
Can you make video about how gps work in battlefield .
Okay, I heard from another military RUclips/ History channel that the T-90 is a modern version of the T-62 or was it the T-72. Could the upgraded bushmaster auto-cannon of a Bradley engage and disable T-62 tanks without relying heavily on the Tow missile?
So where does one get current pricing on vehicles that have been out of production for decades like Warrior and AMX-10P?
They never reveal the real price because they always buy in bulk including spare parts and maintenance.
It's a complicated process
@@Aitelly - I am aware it's not like buying a car - there is no window sticker. However, my point is,... the last time a AMX-10P or Warrior rolled off an assembly line was 3 decades ago. There is no such thing as current pricing under any circumstances.
There was no mention of the chain gun operation is this because it is restricted information ?
I wonder if someday people made an IFV as small as BMPs but with capsule hotel like arrangement. Which can be jettisoned in case of catastrophic damage. Or launched like a VLS system 😂.
Nah, jettisoned. By laying the first row to the ground as the vehicle moves forward, lowering the upper rows, then do the same.
Each capsule can be opened just like a capsule hotel like to be, and by opening the top lid of the capsule. For a rapid deployment.
The bottom side of the capsule have some small struts to absorb the jettisoning impact. And retractable castor wheel to carry the injured.
Each capsule has its own bed, and ofc sound proofing. Also doubles as a brig if you want to capture someone.
Since it is a bed, technically can also be used as an ambulance.
To make some room each capsule can be dismantled. Maybe for an SAM suite, cargo, or bridging.
I think it could carry 4 people inside the all the capsules. Maybe 6 if you think soldiers don't have claustrophobia.
The capsule itself is unarmored. But the bed carrying them is.
It has one driver and one gunner at the front side. Which enters the vehicle like a truck, so, from the side.
The vehicle has no top hatch at all. So you don't need an additional roof for an occasional rain of hand grenade.
As a 91M, most of the information provided is correct, different setups and animation is wrong in some aspects but besides that pretty good video.
At 3:39 it seems the commander and gunner positions are swapped. Shouldn’t the gunner sit on the left?
Yes Gunner on the left almost on all US tank
@@Aitelly on Abrams and Booker, the gunner is always on the right side in front and below the commander, this way it is easier for the loader to pick up rounds and reload. In IFVs or auto-loading tanks like the Bradley, T-90M, Type 90, the gunner sit on the left for more intuitive aiming as reloads are not done by a human loader and the gunner can help the commander if anything is wrong with the autoloader or manually load specialty rounds like ATGMs that is not in the autoloader.
@@dannyzero692 yes you are Right Thanks Danny we got Confused
@@Aitelly no problem! Glad I could help
Have a good exploration of Soviet Yak-38 series
Its retired roght
Great IFV, seen it at Moscow exhibition. Looked nice)
Col. Robert Laurel Smith : But it's a troop carrier, not a tank.
Jones : Do you want me to put a sign on it in fifty languages, "I am a troop carrier, not a tank, please don't shoot at me"?
Quotes from the movie "The Pentagon Wars."
They could also add up a swarm of drone lucher
can you make a video about various Iranian missile types?!
Coming this week Iranian weapon
Im still shocked by the price tag of the German IFV
the Germans have a more reasonable-priced KF41 Lynx machine. it is already in service in Hungary
Me too.
It's always German Engineering
Rly Nice Video
The top attack missile isn't teh bgm 71 its the tow2b i think, idk correct me
Hi
Please make a video on JF17 thunder black 3
Close but no cookie. Lot of information here is wrong especially about the gunner and missle information. Still interesting and fun. Luggage loaded through the loading door. 😂😂😂
Hey Aitelly do you remember me? Do you think you will get a million subscribers before new year?
I don't know 😞 hopefully.
We are planning to provide quality videos for you all
Please can you maka an animation on how a tank turret work?
How can I learn blender
Not to knit pick but...when reloading the TOW the crewmember doesn't have to climb out on the hull. The turret is oriented to the 10 o'clock and the crew can then reload the TOW from the open hatch.
Maybe the camera positioning was off but the British FV510 didn't look bigger than the others.
I just wanted to say I think you might be wrong on the part where you said the Bradley disabled the T-90M, pretty sure it just disabled the turret and the crew escaped. Not a full disable
Noted
Why doesn't the Bradley have a sign that says " I'm a troop carrier and not a tank, please don't shoot "?
It's an IFV, not an APC
Also, unless it's a red cross vehicle, you shoot it??
Next how BTR work please!?
How does A10 warthog work tnks sir
Yes sir will do
how fun it is to fantasize with computer graphics)) a formidable barn with cardboard armor) essentially a disposable cardboard box with firecrackers for delivering consumables
I really don't think the Bradley should be so big. I'd honestly go with a limit of 4 soldiers for the standard variant, and a light tank variant with no troop compartment. The standard variant could have a javelin and gustav armed hunter killer team that could support M1 Abrams tanks, and the variant with no troop compartment could be a nice complement to the abrams as compared to the Booker.
I have one of these tow missile tubes in my room
4:40 is this true? i did NOT know that!
engine - 8 banger
Thanks I just tactically acquired one and was wondering how it worked
When the driver turns left…
It fly up
I was both mechanized and light infantry.I preferred walking everywhere
I heard in Vietnam the marine wanted to Walk too instead of sleeping inside
Hey guys, so lets discuss about which IFV is the best?
In terms of:
Technology
Capabillities
Armor
Price
In my opinion the Puma and The Namer share the first place
Let me know your opinion
why no cv90?
stryker a1 works??
I love the Stryker
Imagine that the m3 Bradley was suppose to be Armed Personal Carrier carrying up to 11 men plus the driver