Challenger 2 Tank How it Works - with Chobham Armour and Iron Fist

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 июн 2024
  • Time Stamp
    0:00 Challenger 2
    0:49 British Mark 4
    1:07 Specification
    1:47 Weight Comparision Abrams leopar2 Merkava T90 t72
    2:47 Fume Extractor How it Works
    3:05 Commander primary Sight
    3:09 Commander's unity Vision
    3:15 Gunners Primary Sight
    3:20 Thermal Observation Gunner's Sight Challenger 2
    3:25 Auxiliary Sight
    3:31 Enforcer (Remote controlled weapon station)
    3:55 Iron Fist APS active protection system
    4:50 Explosive Reactive Armour How it Works?
    5:40 Challenger 2 tank hit by 14 RPG
    6:34 Chobham or Dorchester Armour How it Works
    7:02 Commander Section
    7:41 Gunners Control panel
    7:56 Gunners Day Sight Thermal imagers
    8:42 How to Fire Step by Step process
    10:13 Tank Round Loading Process Step by Step
    10:55 Challenger Blow off panel
    11:20 Engine
    12:26 Auxiliary Power Unit
    12:45 How to Drive Challenger 2 tanks
    14:18 Pros and Cons
    15:18 Vulnerable to close combat urban areas
    This is the Tank that got hit with 14 RPG rockets and an ATG missile .
    Yes that’s right and in one incident around 70 RPGs were launched against it and survived.
    well it’s all because of this Top Secret Dorchester or Chobham armor built with possibly multiple space layers of steel and plastic.
    We will also be looking at the Fire and Control System of this tank! using this Stationary joystick to track and fire with this trigger, hidden just below the controls.
    Interestingly this tank requires 3 parts of Ammunition loading process ! to fire this rifle gun and most importantly the basic process of driving this tank! all in the videos ahead, so don't miss a beat !
    Instagram
    / aitelly3d
    Twitter
    / aitelly3d
    We make it on Blender
    Download it is free and Safe
    www.blender.org/download/
    Peace Out
    As a Small Channel We encourage you sharing our Videos ,
    But Kindly be advised that any unofficial translations or editing of our work in any medium will be considered a breach of our intellectual property rights.
    Apologies for the Legal Language, This happens because we had faced a lot of Duplicates Contents through Experiences ;)
    This has been a result of Big Channels Duplicating our Contents Ripping our original hard work which we have created from Scratch from Modeling to Rigging to Animation to Rendering.So we had to involved Lawyers.
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 817

  • @Aitelly
    @Aitelly  Год назад +54

    Imortant Notes from our Audience The Community is great here.
    1) "Qasim Mir"
    It’s important to note regarding driving is that the steering is geared. Meaning with each gear there is a different turn radius, so if you want to do a tight turn you must change down a few gears to be able to do it. Another thing is the steering tillers only control where the front of the tank is pointing. Meaning, if going ahead and you want to turn right, you must ‘come right stick’ pulling the right lever, but, if you’re reversing and you want to turn right you must ‘come left stick’ and pull the left lever.
    It would be good to touch on the tank’s suspension. Unlike other NATO tanks using torsion bars, Challenger 2 uses hydro pneumatic suspension. The British don’t like suspension that is mounted inside the hull on MBTs so you will never find a British tank with torsion bars. Before on Centurion and Chieftain they had Horstmann suspension. Challenger introduced the outside mounted hydro pneumatic which was easy to service but also performs better at springing and dampening than torsion bar.
    2) "Qasim Mir"
    The firing procedure for a Challenger 2 engagement is as follows (as far as I know):
    Commander or gunner will acquire the the target: ‘A fin, a tank!’
    (‘Fin’ means APFSDS)
    Operator will load the the relevant round
    Gunner when he’s brought to target by the commander and adjusted aim will shout: ‘ON!’ or ‘ARMED!’ Idk😳
    Operator will report: ‘LOADED!’
    Gunner will fire: ‘Firing!’💥
    When the round hits, gunner will say: ‘Target!’
    If the commander is satisfied with the damage he will reply: ‘Target stopped!’
    End of engagement.

    • @muhammedeminkomurcu1040
      @muhammedeminkomurcu1040 Год назад

      Hello, when will Turkish subtitles come to your videos. Because there is no Turkish subtitles even in the automatic translation section.

    • @qasimmir7117
      @qasimmir7117 Год назад +1

      Thank you for sharing my information.

    • @seha6391
      @seha6391 Год назад

      I LOVE IT THIS ARMOR IS STILL CLASSIFIED AND THIS VIDEO IS BULLSHIT IVE SEEN A BROKEN ABRAMS TANK SKIRT And holy SHIT Chalanger is a slow shooter I could load off a round on an Abrams less than a round every 3 seconds

    • @Xyb3rTeCh
      @Xyb3rTeCh Год назад

      Please also do one content for the South Korean K2 Black Panther. Thanks!

    • @zhufortheimpaler4041
      @zhufortheimpaler4041 Год назад +1

      Short correction here:
      1. Challenger 1 still used the same Horstmann Suspension as Chieftain.
      2. The shown weight of the different MBT´s and especcially Challenger 2 are false.
      Challenger 2 without TES (Theater Entry Standard armor addons) weights in 62.5 metric tons, with TES it weights 75-76 metric tons.
      Leopard 2A7V and M1A2 SEP.V3 weight in at about 66 metric tons.
      3. The L30A1 rifled 120mm L/55 gun is exclusively used by the Challenger 2 (L11 rifled 120mm L/55 gun is the predecessor on Challenger 1 and Chieftain). No other NATO partner uses this gun.
      Leopard 2, M1 Abrams and Ariete use variants of the RH120 smoothbore 120x570mm L/44 or L/55 gun, Leclerc uses the GIAT CN-26/52 gun, a 120x570mm smoothbore gun with 52 caliber lengths.
      4. The Enforcer RWS is not regularly mounted on Challenger 2, even in TES configuration. This was added for the "Street Warrior" upgrade for urban combat. Only one Squadron was fitted out like this.
      5. Black Knight, aswell as the other LEP Prototypes were in the end not procured and canceled.
      The described Challenger 2 would not be used in reality, the regular Challenger 2 does not feature a RWS nor an APS system.
      6. The Incident where a Challenger 2 was hit by a Milan ATGM, the Milan used was a Milan 1 ATGM from 1972, wich was sold to Irak in 1982-83 by france.
      The Milan 1 ATGM had a single HEAT Warhead with about 350mm RHAe Penetration. This was indicently less penetration capability than the RPG-7WN and RPG-7WR used by iraki forces (wich had about 500-700mm RHAe penetration)
      This is btw not an example of exceptional survivability.
      If you throw a waterballoon at someone and another one filled with solid ice at another person, you wouldnt say that the person hit with the normal waterballoon is exceptionally tough because he can take the hit.
      CR2 is a late 1980´s design with armor thickness representing that. 350mm HEAT Penetration wont penetrate the frontal armor and would likely struggle with the side armor too.
      Similarly the RPG´s have 500-600mm penetration, that wont do much to the front, at the side this would also be likely not enough to penetrate. This would be also the case for Leopard 2A5 and later versions aswell as M1A2 Abrams versions.
      Other, more modern ATGM and RPG´s, like 9K135 Kornet ATGM with estimated 1200mm Tandem HEAT Warhead would seriously threaten Challenger 2, as it did with Leopard 2 and M1.
      7. one also has to mention that the steering tiller system is quite outdated and anachronistic on a vehicle that entered service in 1998, while basicly all other NATO MBT´s from 1978 onwards used steeringwheels and more user friendly controls.
      8. in comparison to other NATO MBT´s the Engine of CR2 is quite underpowered and both offroad and on road topspeed of CR2 is about 10-15km/h slower than the competition in both areas.
      9. Major Con: Neither Ammunition nor Spareparts are in production for the last 10+ years, the Vehicle itself has basicly no export and is out of production since 2006.
      This turns the Cr2 into a logistical trap

  • @gustafmannerheim9720
    @gustafmannerheim9720 Год назад +575

    You miss the most imprtant part, the very core and soul of this tank and all british tanks, the tactical tea maker.

    • @jac627
      @jac627 Год назад +12

      That tea reference is so hackneyed

    • @SeahamV2
      @SeahamV2 Год назад +7

      Chally of the woods approves.

    • @mkvenner2
      @mkvenner2 Год назад +18

      The tactical tea maker was in the Challenger 1. The Challenger 2 has a boil water unit that can do more than make tea but is mostly just used for tea

    • @davidbridge5652
      @davidbridge5652 Год назад +16

      As an English man I would be offended if it didnt have one

    • @SeahamV2
      @SeahamV2 Год назад +1

      @@davidbridge5652 I can tea bag you if you want?.....

  • @catlee8064
    @catlee8064 Год назад +99

    One of the few channels which actually point out its 3 part ammo....Well done.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +7

      Thank You

    • @Maurizio4672
      @Maurizio4672 10 месяцев назад

      tu saresti il nobile Staminchia?

    • @Gu1s
      @Gu1s Месяц назад

      Кто-то этого не знает😂😂😂?

  • @Aitelly
    @Aitelly  Год назад +30

    Please Subscribe 🤘

    • @mathijeba5375
      @mathijeba5375 Год назад +2

      Ok

    • @mathijeba5375
      @mathijeba5375 Год назад +1

      How does a mig 29 work plzz

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +2

      @@mathijeba5375 Ok after we are done with the T90 Russian tank Autoloader Mechanism

    • @nuclearwarhead9338
      @nuclearwarhead9338 Год назад +1

      @@Aitelly please make a video explaining the Fly-By-Wire for unstable aircrafts.

    • @johaneslerius9943
      @johaneslerius9943 Год назад +1

      Oke dokey👍👍👍😁😁😁

  • @fleshtearer9454
    @fleshtearer9454 9 месяцев назад +17

    First Challenger was destroyed today

  • @gustaafpeeters6173
    @gustaafpeeters6173 9 месяцев назад +22

    In reality, in Ukraine they are kept at the behind the lines on demand of the British, the front is "not safe enough" I wonder what's the point for sending them.

    • @Zz_Mike-Hawk_zZ
      @Zz_Mike-Hawk_zZ 9 месяцев назад +5

      Now we know why.

    • @overdrivelzma.9219
      @overdrivelzma.9219 8 месяцев назад +2

      @zz_mike-hawk_zz True challenger ii lost undefeated in Ukraine against a powerful atgm, only the Abraham m1a2 remains to be seen in action and performance.

    • @Zz_Mike-Hawk_zZ
      @Zz_Mike-Hawk_zZ 8 месяцев назад

      @@overdrivelzma.9219 I have made a video about it, it you want to check it out.

    • @stanmil5495
      @stanmil5495 2 месяца назад

      Send them back then, talk about biting the hand that feeds you

    • @henm3000
      @henm3000 27 дней назад

      and that the reason for Merkava 4 b the best tank in the world. The Merakava's Marching to the battlefield, and know how came back home safely

  • @movieviewing
    @movieviewing Год назад +55

    I always wondered how challenger was different from abrams you hear all the time about abrams blow out panel or how it drives. These vids are great very informative and gets straight to the point of how the tanks works that can’t get from a google search easily. I look forward to all the future vids.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +6

      Next Russian T90M Autoloader

    • @deven6518
      @deven6518 Год назад +1

      Can't get from a Google search easily? Lol

    • @zulfanirich7594
      @zulfanirich7594 10 месяцев назад

      still a coward in ukraine 😂😂

    • @Maurizio4672
      @Maurizio4672 10 месяцев назад

      ora hai capito perchè gli abrams bruciano che è una meraviglia?

  • @Uga-booga
    @Uga-booga Год назад +24

    Wow! What an amazing machine. Excellent video.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +2

      Thanks for the comment

  • @HideeyeeL
    @HideeyeeL Год назад +72

    Amazing what engineers can achieve when it comes to weaponry 💥

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +3

      yes

    • @linuxuberuser
      @linuxuberuser Год назад +1

      Imagine if engineers were hired to build space ships that ran on rocket-less propulsion. It's already been done.

    • @komisiantikorupsikoruptord6257
      @komisiantikorupsikoruptord6257 Год назад +3

      ​@@Aitelly 2:20 The Soviets made their bridge capacity 45 tons so that when western tanks passed, the bridge would immediately collapse

  • @qasimmir7117
    @qasimmir7117 Год назад +29

    It’s important to note regarding driving is that the steering is geared. Meaning with each gear there is a different turn radius, so if you want to do a tight turn you must change down a few gears to be able to do it. Another thing is the steering tillers only control where the front of the tank is pointing. Meaning, if going ahead and you want to turn right, you must ‘come right stick’ pulling the right lever, but, if you’re reversing and you want to turn right you must ‘come left stick’ and pull the left lever.
    It would be good to touch on the tank’s suspension. Unlike other NATO tanks using torsion bars, Challenger 2 uses hydro pneumatic suspension. The British don’t like suspension that is mounted inside the hull on MBTs so you will never find a British tank with torsion bars. Before on Centurion and Chieftain they had Horstmann suspension. Challenger introduced the outside mounted hydro pneumatic which was easy to service but also performs better at springing and dampening than torsion bar.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +5

      Thanks for the beautifully written notes.
      Learned a lot today

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +6

      We have Credited you for this insightful comment.

    • @danhodson7187
      @danhodson7187 Год назад +4

      HAS to have good suspension or the crew might spill their cuppa!

    • @qasimmir7117
      @qasimmir7117 Год назад +4

      @@danhodson7187
      Indeed. Tea is vital for victory.☕️

    • @realitygaming4088
      @realitygaming4088 11 месяцев назад +1

      Great read. My dad spent his career transporting challengers and other vehicles nice to have a good insight into it all.

  • @shouriroy1242
    @shouriroy1242 Год назад +26

    I am very happy to see that your video quality is developing. Hope you get more subscribers soon . ❤ from 🇮🇳.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +4

      Thanks Better Video as we try to recruit more people

  • @thenoblecat536
    @thenoblecat536 Год назад +20

    So basically, they designed this tank all in defend stat, the attack is based on the elite crews from British

  • @rockrock8706
    @rockrock8706 Год назад +46

    Challenger 2 is lovely and is the most beautiful MBT in the world

    • @qasimmir7117
      @qasimmir7117 Год назад +5

      Indeed she is.

    • @user-xr5mj4fc7g
      @user-xr5mj4fc7g Год назад +5

      Да , красивый...Только поэтому на него и соблазнилась одна страна в мире , кроме Англии.

    • @pieterveenders9793
      @pieterveenders9793 2 месяца назад

      After the Leopard she's definitely one of the most beautiful.

  • @GeneralThargor
    @GeneralThargor Год назад +14

    You forgot it's most important feature, the water boiler so you can have a nice cup of tea after the battle.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +4

      Yes. We thought everyone knew about it

    • @moongoose2095
      @moongoose2095 Год назад +3

      Kettle you silly billy

    • @XIXjlo
      @XIXjlo Год назад

      @@moongoose2095 boiler vessel

    • @TheJoyofSix
      @TheJoyofSix Год назад +1

      During the battle, dear boy

  • @EntityVII
    @EntityVII Год назад +3

    This video is extremely helpful for someone that wants to 3D model a game ready tank with an Interior and physicalized damage. Thanks for this video.

  • @user-fd8bp3ix1e
    @user-fd8bp3ix1e 10 месяцев назад +2

    Так понимаю в передней части где место мехвода нет активной брони по центру?

  • @BrownSquats
    @BrownSquats Год назад +6

    Stumbled upon the video. Now hooked. Excellent work!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      Awesome of you thanks 🙏

  • @andypandy9013
    @andypandy9013 Год назад +11

    The Mk 4 was not just the first British Tank, it was the first Tank anywhere.
    To keep them secret before they were first used in World War One they were described as "Mobile Water Tanks", or just "Tanks". The name stuck. 😃

  • @johnlegend023
    @johnlegend023 Год назад +6

    Such a good tank. One of the best you can have

  • @billyponsonby
    @billyponsonby Год назад +6

    Remarkable work. Excellent!

  • @Sebastian-S
    @Sebastian-S Год назад +5

    My previous favorite was the L2 A7, but I would take this anyday.

  • @MyScotty7
    @MyScotty7 Год назад +5

    My favourite tank,beautiful

  • @cjaydustie1867
    @cjaydustie1867 Год назад +1

    Love this video! Great detail and information. Can’t wait to see if you have videos on other MBTs after I finish this!

  • @dfgdfg_
    @dfgdfg_ Год назад +8

    Beautifully animated 🔥

  • @hb_main1471
    @hb_main1471 Год назад +17

    the up armoured variant you show is actually pushing 85 tonnes

    • @paulmatthews2175
      @paulmatthews2175 Год назад +3

      no it isn't, the full TES version is 72 tonnes

  • @njathifrancis
    @njathifrancis Год назад +3

    Thanks! I've been having trouble firing my Challenger tank

  • @JohnMcMahon.
    @JohnMcMahon. Год назад +2

    This channel is exactly what I’ve been looking for. Thanks 👍

  • @HeroBudu
    @HeroBudu Год назад +4

    Your videos never fail to amaze me

  • @edandaniels3922
    @edandaniels3922 Год назад +7

    really useful. I am about to break into an armored division's HQ and steal a tank and this is going to be helpful. appreciate the info!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      thanks

    • @Grimnir_x
      @Grimnir_x Год назад

      Can you grab me one while you're there?

  • @yereverluvinuncleber
    @yereverluvinuncleber Год назад +8

    A positive you failed to mention is the suspension that allows better cross country performance than its competitors even with higher power engines. Coupled with easier repair to the external suspension units when damaged in combat, whereas battle damaged welded torsion bars in the Leopards and Abrams require back to base, torsion bar torch-cutting, disassembly, removal and repair.

  • @mikeymikeFType
    @mikeymikeFType Год назад +5

    Challenger 2 just came out on top of a recent NATO exercise beating Leopards and Abrams etc

    • @raf9826
      @raf9826 Год назад +6

      Yes this was really impressive, I wonder how great the Challenger 3 will turn out to be if they did this well with the Chally 2.

    • @Robin-sf3gk
      @Robin-sf3gk 11 месяцев назад

      Why is nobody mentioning the french Leclerc here?

    • @overdrivelzma.9219
      @overdrivelzma.9219 8 месяцев назад +2

      In the real war with a regular and competent army challenger lost undefeated in Ukraine by the employment of a laser guide ATGM.

  • @TRUMP_WAS_RIGHT_ABOUT_EVRYTHNG
    @TRUMP_WAS_RIGHT_ABOUT_EVRYTHNG 9 месяцев назад

    no idea how youtube got this suggestion right! it only took 15 or so years for their algorithm lord to figure out what i want to watch !LOL great channel , ill probably watch all your videos in a week!

  • @yanayana5408
    @yanayana5408 5 месяцев назад +1

    Great video, fantastic animation, top notch narrative.

  • @JoshEastham
    @JoshEastham 11 месяцев назад +1

    I wish I discovered this channel earlier. Every time there is a country show I never get to go in the challenger because the queue is too long. So it is nice to know how the internals, and periscope work etc

  • @chrissandi9613
    @chrissandi9613 5 месяцев назад

    Fantastic! Have just discovered AiTelly channel. It's absolutely great, with so much interesting and informative engineering and technical detail. But - vitally - you explain everything clearly for mechanical thickos like me.

  • @Ernest-jr
    @Ernest-jr Год назад +5

    I am Russian, and I can barely speak English. Much less be polite. First of all, thank you very much.
    1. The coaxial chain gun looks much simpler, single barrel. It has features important for a close tank.
    2. English tanks are one of the narrowest today. Even in comparison with the Soviet ones. The thing about railroad overpasses. Some decisions of this tank have to do with the width.
    3. The hydraulic automatic transmission does not disengage the clutch, but reduces the power of one of the tracks.
    4. The Challenger can still fire at a large downward lean angle, which increases its heavy turret. It has relatively high ground clearance, a smooth bottom, and mine protection. This, too, increases the height.
    5. The suspension of this tank is unusual: compact and adjustable (located on sides, not on the bottom, which reduces the height of the tank). That is why the tank can withstand unprecedented overloading of the hinged protection.
    6. The inclined multilayer armor barrier refracts (as in optics) the shock front of the penetrator many times. This leads to its defocusing (as in optics). In practice it looks like the penetrator is crumbled, by dissipating the energy to fluctuate the layers.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +1

      @
      Ernest Awesome point of view

    • @Ernest-jr
      @Ernest-jr Год назад +1

      @@Aitelly I was trying to present facts, not opinions. There are too many opinions around.

    • @robertpatrick3350
      @robertpatrick3350 Год назад +2

      Point 5 the suspension system has inspired the new South Korean tanks and it will become more prevalent.
      Point 4 British tank designers have long valued being able to have a large depression angle, this has proved extremely valuable to them in many conflicts eg Korea and to the Israeli’s where the Syrian forces were at a significant disadvantage.

    • @kallanr360
      @kallanr360 Год назад +4

      "I can barely speak English" delivers a seminar of information on the tank concisely.
      Please never learn English properly, you will make us look bad.

  • @markjosephbudgieridgard
    @markjosephbudgieridgard Год назад

    Wow thanks another excellent video..... 👍 Mark from UK..... The home of the challenger 2

  • @aestheticheart660
    @aestheticheart660 10 месяцев назад +1

    Im obsessed to your channel.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад

      we love you Guys so much.
      Thanks!

  • @Vikingdescendent
    @Vikingdescendent 7 месяцев назад

    Next level video. Good job!

  • @MHD0.0
    @MHD0.0 Год назад +2

    great job bro👌 thank you 👍

  • @fehmikucukozdemir
    @fehmikucukozdemir Год назад

    Great video,thank you.

  • @fveS
    @fveS Год назад

    Excellent visualization

  • @EngineerGram
    @EngineerGram Год назад +5

    Amazing animation ❤

  • @mongoliandude
    @mongoliandude Год назад +2

    I'm glad you're talking about the Challenger 2 here and not the "Challenger 3". The UK government isn't fooling anyone that what is merely upgrade suite is a new tank.

    • @k-ron7403
      @k-ron7403 Год назад +3

      Well it’s an entirely new turret, gun, firing system, self defence system, new armour and new engine. So i would hardly call it a light upgrade. It will do nicely and certainly better than anything potential foes have. Just need more of them

    • @1maico1
      @1maico1 8 месяцев назад

      The only thing the same between the II and III is the chassis. The gun is switching to smoothbore.

    • @jpracing893
      @jpracing893 6 месяцев назад

      @@1maico1 Even then it's been changed, the lower Glacis has been up armoured on a chassis level not just add-on, the tank uses 3rd Gen Chobham called Farnham and has add-on armour like the Challenger 2 TES had called EPSOM which is upgraded from current standards (This is how we'd send tanks into battle with the add-on armour) So the Chassis has had a lot of work done, not forgetting APS has been confirmed, specifically Trophy.

  • @AZAZEL8881
    @AZAZEL8881 Год назад +1

    Thank you to the channel, interesting information) Thank you to Great Britain for helping in the fight against aggression!

  • @fredsas12
    @fredsas12 Год назад +12

    The combat weight of the Challenger is is actually 75 metric tonnes. The training weight of the tank is the standard 63 tonnes. For comparison, the combat weight of the M1A2 Abrams with TUSK is 68 metric tonnes.

  • @mohammadhadi_moradi
    @mohammadhadi_moradi 9 месяцев назад

    Your channel is great

  • @Oluwka80
    @Oluwka80 Год назад +1

    Thanks for great video

  • @user-nx6wb6et4v
    @user-nx6wb6et4v 10 месяцев назад +1

    this is really nice video ,please more

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад

      But we did not get any views 😔

  • @Harvy500
    @Harvy500 Год назад +5

    Chobham armour = developed by DERA ( Defence Evaluation Research Agency) British army department in a village called Chobham in Surrey south east of England.
    I lived there for 15 years.

    • @yurkofess3825
      @yurkofess3825 6 месяцев назад

      They call "Chobham" most composite NERA armour variants, including non-British. Actually, part of Challenger2 armor plating and APS - made in Israel.

  • @hamzayusuf333
    @hamzayusuf333 Год назад +1

    Great as usual

  • @Hespro
    @Hespro 10 месяцев назад +1

    That's very very informative

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  10 месяцев назад

      Thanks 🙏👍

  • @guilherme5035
    @guilherme5035 Год назад

    Nice video! Thanks!

  • @chrisyoung9653
    @chrisyoung9653 Год назад +9

    the challenger 2 just won a NATO tank competition last week. leopard came 2nd and abrams 3rd

    • @zulfanirich7594
      @zulfanirich7594 10 месяцев назад +1

      still a coward in ukraine 😂😂

    • @chrisyoung9653
      @chrisyoung9653 10 месяцев назад

      @@zulfanirich7594 no need to use the good tanks yet. any old tank will do against poor wee russia and their egg cartons🤣🤣🤣

    • @overdrivelzma.9219
      @overdrivelzma.9219 8 месяцев назад +1

      @chrisyoung9653 Already tested it against a professional army, Challenger lost the undefeated were 2 units lost out of 10, I don't think UK will give him more units.

    • @chrisyoung9653
      @chrisyoung9653 8 месяцев назад +1

      @@overdrivelzma.9219 no they were only given so Germany would send leopard 2s. Worked great

    • @overdrivelzma.9219
      @overdrivelzma.9219 8 месяцев назад

      @chrisyoung9653 It only remains the Abraham M1A2 to make their combat debut in Europe and see if they better withstand a high intensity war, I think France will never send its Leclercs.

  • @stevea2909
    @stevea2909 Год назад +2

    Great work as always! Dang, that tank is a beast! Watching your videos,I'm gaining a bit of knowledge, you know what they say about that.

  • @keith8880
    @keith8880 Год назад +1

    Excellent video

  • @DennisTichelkamp-mt6wf
    @DennisTichelkamp-mt6wf 3 месяца назад

    This series is great

  • @adi_s6
    @adi_s6 9 месяцев назад +4

    Bro Can you make a detailed video like this on a apc(armored personal carrier) maybe Boxer

  • @michaelbrown-ub6jr
    @michaelbrown-ub6jr Год назад +1

    Great video well done

  • @nikolapilipovic3884
    @nikolapilipovic3884 10 месяцев назад

    Amazing animations! Very informative! If you guys don't mind leaving references to the litarature on which you are basing your work, that would be fantatistic!

  • @perrybonney9090
    @perrybonney9090 11 месяцев назад

    Well done, for sure.

  • @meglo1591
    @meglo1591 Год назад

    I can now operate the tank thank you aitelly

  • @ASHISHYADAV-ny5nv
    @ASHISHYADAV-ny5nv Год назад +2

    great content❤❤

  • @appsstore11
    @appsstore11 Год назад +4

    This video was awesome thank you for your hard work ❤

  • @rinsedpie
    @rinsedpie 5 месяцев назад

    Very good technical animation

  • @thyresias194
    @thyresias194 Год назад +1

    Good job guys, please Leclerc tank !

  • @jackmears8017
    @jackmears8017 Год назад +2

    Finally, the challenger 2 !

    • @overdrivelzma.9219
      @overdrivelzma.9219 8 месяцев назад +1

      It's a pity that Challenger II lost the undefeated in Ukraine to a semi-professional regular army.

  • @CosmicClusters
    @CosmicClusters Год назад +1

    Awesome Guys

  • @motulex2765
    @motulex2765 Год назад

    Very cool video

  • @hmartin2594
    @hmartin2594 Год назад

    Great 👍 videos

  • @rishi7629
    @rishi7629 Год назад +4

    Please do other lesser known tanks like Oplot, Al Khalid etc, SR-72 etc.

  • @duslanhanger8489
    @duslanhanger8489 Год назад +1

    👨‍💻Excelente una vez mas .tienes mis saludos .⬜🟦🟥 👏👏👏

  • @skwal5464
    @skwal5464 Год назад +4

    to know how it work you just have to ask on war thunder forums and wait until someone give you classified document

  • @nothingspecial6925
    @nothingspecial6925 Год назад +2

    So, we have absolutely no idea what its Dorchester armour comprises off. The only reference we have is we know what Burlington arrays No.1 to 4 looked like, which were in fact bulging plate technology using plastic and steel. However, that technology was patented in 1962 and Dorchester is a much newer and advanced development from the Burlington arrays and like how the Germans dropped the bulging plate armour design in their B-Tech armours and started using ceramics in newer armours in C-Tech and the US went with using depleted Uranium in some way with is HAP and NGAP armour over the bulging plate armours in its early BRL armours, it's likely Dorchester has moved onto incorporating more advanced material arrays. However, despite what most people say, there is absolutely no available information that gives us an idea of what Dorchester is made off.
    I'd be lying to say it didn't bug me to see the composite armour animated right in the front within the 100mm steel plate armour but I know its just for education purposes.

  • @Ola4family
    @Ola4family Год назад +1

    As much as I love Tanks, I love me some Mighty-Mo! Hope to see some ships!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      Coming soon after we are done with Autoloader

  • @Aneesh-Roy444.
    @Aneesh-Roy444. Год назад +5

    I give a solid like 👍🏻 for this wonderful fantastic and simply understandably explained awesome 😎 animated British Challanger -2 video...!

  • @jaymac7203
    @jaymac7203 Год назад +2

    Dont forget the brew making facilities 🍵 😭 lol 😂

    • @awatt
      @awatt Год назад +2

  • @Westernaut
    @Westernaut Год назад

    Amazing.

  • @GyanPrakash
    @GyanPrakash 9 месяцев назад +6

    It runs on TEA 😂

  • @tigriller9727
    @tigriller9727 Год назад

    Very good

  • @timoonnovi
    @timoonnovi Год назад +2

    Mistake on 1:54. T-72 is a russian tank (T-90 prototype) which is produced on Urals manufactories and is presented in a very small amount in the ua forces, while the main ukrainian army tank is T-64 made in Kharkov.

    • @overdrivelzma.9219
      @overdrivelzma.9219 8 месяцев назад +2

      T 90M Provy3 vs T 84 Oplot.
      This encounter will never happen Ukraine does not send its oplot to the front only owns 10 units.

  • @axnnaandmikeyplayz5044
    @axnnaandmikeyplayz5044 Год назад +5

    can you please do t-90 next

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +6

      Yes T90M the latest version

  • @MohammadAdliadlious
    @MohammadAdliadlious Год назад +1

    Thanks!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      Thank You so much.
      We have also credited your name in our last Video

    • @MohammadAdliadlious
      @MohammadAdliadlious Год назад

      @@Aitelly thanks, I really appreciate that

  • @jacinthenricoso352
    @jacinthenricoso352 Год назад +54

    Next is a t-34

  • @gunshipzeroone3546
    @gunshipzeroone3546 Год назад +8

    What a great video you have done here very easy how you explain information in this video great video graphics love it.
    Just to let you know, not long ago, the USA wanted this classified armour for the USA tank's so both the uk and us did a deal to share the technology as the uk got some technology on the us submarine technology so ONLY the USA and UK are the only tank's to have this armour.

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад

      Thanks for the support and Feedback notes

    • @user-dl3nc4jx7k
      @user-dl3nc4jx7k Год назад +2

      you are writing absolute nonsense.firstly, the world's first tank with composite armor was built in the USSR, the T-64.Secondly, the spaced armor in the forehead of the tower of several dozen armor plates with air gaskets and other materials is not a privilege of the USA and England.This has been done on the T-90 in Russia since the 90s

    • @gonzomuse
      @gonzomuse Год назад +4

      @@user-dl3nc4jx7k He didn't say "spaced" armour or "composite" armour. He was referring to Chobham armour specifically, which was used on the Challenger 1 and shared with the US for the M1A1. Dorchester is the upgraded Chobham variant on CH2, while the Americans developed their own variant for the M1A2.

  • @LordOfLight
    @LordOfLight Год назад +3

    "....the Mark IV. The first battle-tested tank made by British engineers......". In fact the first tank made by anyone anywhere. Called a "tank" because that was the code word for it while under development and the name stuck.

    • @nordic0815
      @nordic0815 Год назад +1

      Spot on… The tank was originally named land ship by British Military in WW1. The name "tank" was initially a code name to maintain secrecy and disguise its true purpose by making it appear to be a water transport vehicle for bringing water to the troops at the front line.
      Extra Facts:
      Challenger 2 (CR2) tank can also set a smoke screen by the injection of diesel fuel into the engine exhausts.
      The secret weapon of any British Armoured Vehicle BV. A boiling vessel (BV) is a water heating system fitted to British armoured fighting vehicles that permits the crew to heat water and cook food by drawing power from the vehicle electrical supply. It is often referred to by crewmembers as "the most important piece of equipment in a British armoured vehicle".

  • @MrAnonymousme10
    @MrAnonymousme10 Год назад

    I love how the tank's maid gun reminiscent the 18th century cannon.

  • @shavedchimp2050
    @shavedchimp2050 8 месяцев назад

    Another detail, with a full system the gunner does not correct for wind and elevation. Elevation is calculated at the point of lasing and acquiring the range to the target. Windage is calculated via data from the MET sensor mounted on top of the turret. Only when all systems have failed does the gunner have to resort to manual correction. Great video though, brought back memories. 👍

  • @mufizz6000
    @mufizz6000 Год назад +3

    They really improved so much

  • @HTY-Ersin_126
    @HTY-Ersin_126 Год назад +1

    Very nice video. Thank you for your effort

  • @aungkyawkhant321
    @aungkyawkhant321 8 месяцев назад +1

    awesome!

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  8 месяцев назад

      Thank you! Cheers!

  • @davec5153
    @davec5153 5 месяцев назад

    The upgrades you mentioned will be on Challenger 3, Dorchester armour, 1500hp engine, Triumph protection system, better third gen optics and the new Rhine metal 120mm smooth bore gun.

  • @Culeeeee
    @Culeeeee 10 месяцев назад

    Could be worth to mention that one of the cons is the rifling of the gun, which slows down the sabbot rounds (so less penetration power) but are neccesary for HESH rounds which are less effective because of explosive reactive armor. I think they are considering going smooth bore for their next challenger version.

  • @shavedchimp2050
    @shavedchimp2050 8 месяцев назад

    If memory serves me correctly, the safety switch on the GCP does not isolate the firing circuit it only isolates the Gun Control Equipment ie. turret movement, same for the Commanders Safety switch. The Loaders Control Panel Safety switch does however isolate the Firing Circuit and the GCE.

  • @shouriroy1242
    @shouriroy1242 Год назад +1

    I was waiting for your new video.😊. Please, upload next video faster. Please, upload video on 🇮🇱Merkava Thank. ❤ From 🇮🇳.

  • @Verezart
    @Verezart 7 месяцев назад +5

    T-72 is a Russian tank. Ukraine uses Soviet T-64.

  • @anasrifaie4243
    @anasrifaie4243 Год назад

    Type 10 next pls 😊

  • @MrDino1953
    @MrDino1953 Год назад +3

    What is the maximum firing rate (rounds per minute) of the main gun? How much pressure do the tracks exert on the ground? How do these parameters compare to other main battle tanks?

    • @TheVonJagger
      @TheVonJagger Год назад +3

      8 rounds in 42 seconds I think is the record.

  • @HIFLY01
    @HIFLY01 Год назад +3

    I like the commander and gunner animation. They looked more alive than other videos

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +1

      Thanks

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +1

      Thanks- we try our best

  • @Diomedes1
    @Diomedes1 Год назад +13

    Things I learned today: the Brits basically have to put some sort of a rifle clip to ignite the Challenger 2´s main gun 😄
    Yeah looking forward for the T-90M animation 👌

    • @Aitelly
      @Aitelly  Год назад +3

      🙏 thanks 👍

    • @Kohagaan
      @Kohagaan Год назад +1

      And the Leclerc tank animation too 👍

    • @DH.2016
      @DH.2016 Год назад

      Amazing to think that the Chally's main gun shares, in effect, a 3 component ammo system with the likes of a rifled musket in the American Civil War some 130 years earlier with the latter's ammo consisting of a cartridge with powder, a Minie ball and a percussion cap.

    • @kizzyp2735
      @kizzyp2735 Год назад +2

      @@DH.2016 ...the reality is though its no slower than single piece tank ammo.