Best video I have seen so far covering Systems Architecture really from the system (having elements of software and especially of hardware) point of view. Great lecture man!
There is a typo on the slide at 3:03. In the definition of architecting, replace non-qualitative with Non-quantitative. I have also cross-checked the book. Thank you very much for the great content.
Generally I think this a quite good but very brief introduction. However I lack some reasoning around principles such as "separation of concerns"; "coupling and cohesion", "separation of policy and implementation" and not just abstraction and hierarchy as to deal with complexity. Today the notion of "architectural concerns" and viewpoints (perspectives) is dealing with complexity and that is not only about abstraction or hierarchy but more about separation of concerns. Furthermore, in a decomposition of a larger thing it is quite often that the elements showing up there are abstraction themselves.
![What is System Architecture? [Intro to Enterprise Architecture, Integration, and BI]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/-NMg6yFJrlQ/mqdefault.jpg)
Best video I have seen so far covering Systems Architecture really from the system (having elements of software and especially of hardware) point of view.
Great lecture man!
Thanks for spending the time to create and share this content 🤙🏾
Such a fluent and beautiful content about systems architecture; thank you guys, sincerely . It is really nice work. mr. professor -> respect++
There is a typo on the slide at 3:03. In the definition of architecting, replace non-qualitative with Non-quantitative.
I have also cross-checked the book.
Thank you very much for the great content.
Generally I think this a quite good but very brief introduction. However I lack some reasoning around principles such as "separation of concerns"; "coupling and cohesion", "separation of policy and implementation" and not just abstraction and hierarchy as to deal with complexity. Today the notion of "architectural concerns" and viewpoints (perspectives) is dealing with complexity and that is not only about abstraction or hierarchy but more about separation of concerns. Furthermore, in a decomposition of a larger thing it is quite often that the elements showing up there are abstraction themselves.
Good points. The assumption are more derived from simple physical system.
Looking for Part 2
2020. Thank you!
helped a bunch :)