As a native of Holstein, I think 99% of people here have no idea we were briefly ruled by Austria 160 years ago. It's a minor detail that disappears in the bigger confusing picture.
@@mrhonigkuchen2649 well it ended in 1837 because of Victoria's accession, as Semi-Salic law prevented a woman to rule Hanover. So how would it be the other way around?
@@SimonDmanhow can you say they were ruled by Britain when the house that ruled was called house of Hannover 😂 if anything it would be the other way around lol. What you mean if that they were both under the same king.
Narration suggestion: when mentioning dates, drop the year in there now and then. Doing so helps anchor events in the listener’s mind. A long series of “15 May, then 20 October, then 13 November, then 17 December”, etc., causes the listener to lose track of the year. The years are more important anyway.
Hell ya. I don't recall year being mentioned at all cept at the very start. I have no idea what year it is when vid concludes. 1880's ? If not .. when?
I'd also suggest having the year on the map of large changes to area. Makes it easier to remember when these changes happened and over what timespan. Would add some useful context when trying to take in the information.
No the years are not more important - the order of events is far more important than the year .. in the spring this happened, in the summer that happend, then in the fall this happened, then everybody took a break for winter and in april everybody started fighting again for year 2 .. throw a visual transition from year xxxx to year yyyy and keep talking .. "during the reign of frederick" is all you need to know .. 'fred died and william and otto von bismark took over' .. at some point he mentioned 1864 which was during the US Civil War .. 1866 was the creation of the Northern German Confederation .. the southern german states joined in 1871 .. the German Empire was created in 1871 .. the first Dano-Prussian War over schlesswig was 1848 to 1852 .. the Second Dano-Prussian War over schlesswig was feb 1864 .. it ended in oct 1864 .. takes less than 2 minutes to find that info .. do some research ..
Geograficly: it's the Center of europe Ethnicly: it's a wide Mix of europeans with an intense allegiance to their German heritage Historical: germans are involved in the history of a lot of countrys all over the World (France, Russia, Britan, Spain, Greec, Brazil, Argentinia, USA eg)
Germany's history from the HRE to the German Empire and now the Federal Republic of Germany is quite interesting on the formation of one of the most influencial nations.
Interesting note, the UK was on Denmark's side while Hanover on the German Confederation's side. Eleven years prior the two kingdoms of Hanover and UK were ruled by the same person. Hooray for feudalism.
And Queen Victoria picked the new Prince of Hanover in time for the First World War (which put an English Duke on the German side). (Look up the Dukedom of Albany).
@@allangibson8494I believe that Edward, the Duke of Albany, was chosen by Victoria to become the Prince of Coburg, not Hanover. Her nearest male relative and his descendants became the rulers of Hanover upon her accession to the throne in 1837. Coburg was where her consort, Prince Albert, was from, and she wanted to continue his memory by selecting Coburg's ruler. When Edward became the Prince of Coburg, he had to give his allegiance to the Kaiser upon doing so, and give his support to Germany during WWI. When Hitler took over in 1933, Edward became a member of the Nazi Party, and he wound up doing Hitler's bidding. As a result of all this activity, he was ostracized by the members of the British Royal family, and would never be able to step onto British soil again. He had to watch Queen Elizabeth's coronation on film from afar in Coburg. To this day, no member of the Royal family has made a visit to Coburg.
@@allangibson8494 And as an addendum to what I mentioned before, since the Kaiser was also a grandson of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert, that made Edward and the Kaiser cousins to one another with one royal cousin merely giving allegiance to another royal cousin in another country and, therefore, keeping allegiance within the family as it were.
Should have talked about the Napoleonic Wars and the German mediatisation instead. Napoleon's France took German lands up to the Rhine, and the Imperial crown had to compensate remaining nobles by effectively consolidating the innumerable tiny independent states into the larger blocs we see at the start of the Victorian age. That's when all the bishoprics, small counties and free states that you see in medieval maps disappeared, and is far less talked about than Bismarck's unification.
True, Napoleon was more important for German unification, than Bismarck was. Even wasn't Napoleons intention, the Code Civil also played a huge role as a role model for creating the modern German law system, that was drafted under Bismarck
@@tobiasharstel7941 Napoleon was above all an external threat, the dead and his rule drove the small states together to free themselves from the occupation & suppression. Napoleon's military conquests and the associated occupations led to significant burdens for the affected areas. Especially after the Battle of Nations near Leipzig in 1813, an intense hatred of Napoleon and the French developed, which dominated the German view of France throughout the 19th century. His military campaigns and harsh occupation policies resulted in considerable losses and suffering in the occupied territories, contributing to his perception as a brutal ruler. But yes also in part as Reformer
@@aAverageFan But Russian authorities are now trying to rebuild the historical parts of Königsberg that were either destroyed during the war or after and replaced with Soviet/Marxist concrete coffins etc.
The presentation was absolutely fascinating to watch, the graphics were great, the narration was very clear. Understandable, I really enjoyed it, thank you.
Clear? What are you talking about?! The presentation started in the middle ages, jumped to the XIX century, back to XV, then re-back to XIX! I originally rewinded the video but then just let it go to the end. All of this history was nothing but pure idiocy. But it helps me a lot knowing that Europeans are just as screwed up as Americans, despite the woke always pounding how better Europe is. This video is just a small sample of reality, and it lurks beneath the smooth European appearance.
When I grew up in the 1960's in peaceful and wealthy Southern Germany nothing could be seen of anything that had happened earlier except the ruins of a 1000-year old castle...
Would it be false to say, Southern Germany STILL is peaceful and wealthy ? (notwithstanding the Divine Law that earlier everything was better, especially sex :) )
Worthwhile mentioning that when Germany was so fractured particularly in the Middle Ages it was actually far easier for the emperor to rule over it since there was no strong and united opposition to this power.
So did all this happen 1 year? Over a period of 10 years? 50 years? What?? When were they officially a German empire?? You need to mention dates of these events, or at least years.
@@Spungmangett The Holy Roman Empire ended in August 1806 when Francis II. laid down the imperial crown (without consent from the other princes and electors) because he feared the entire HRE, and by extension his Habsburg core domains, could fall into Napoleon's hands. De facto the Empire was already finished a month earlier when a number of German states joined Napoleon's Confederation of the Rhine, which also resulted in the elevation of Bavaria and Württemberg to kingdoms.
Prussia was kinda a precursor to Germany. It's far more complicated than that but even up to WW1 the English and French called them Prussians and they had a very similar flag
The German empire formed during /after the Franco Prussian war(when Prussia and its allies took Paris) that’s why there is the famous painting with all the German leaders in Paris.
@@johnmorales6281 This is one more example. There are no other examples out of the ordinary. The Teutonic knights ultimately were utterly defeated and ruled by Poland and later Poland-Lithuania. So, violence yes, but not even a success.
Finally a sane soul whose just happy to watch instead of immature professor of language correction maniacs who likes to find small mistakes on everything
Good Video. I want to note: during the first Schleswig -Holstein war Sweden and Norway (then the united kingdom of Sweden and Norway) fought to a degree on the side of Denmark. That said, 90% of the troops involved in the fighting were Danish, but the combo of some troops and supply support was probably part of why Denmark won the first conflict. After WW1 Denmark given an offer by the victorious allies to take back Schleswig, but instead only took back the Northern half of Schleswig, the part that had a Danish majority, and this is the border between Denmark and Germany to this day.
Additionally, the exact border was confirmed through plebiscites in the border municipalities, so even the fucking Nazis did not dare alter the border one centimeter. Currently, the Danish minority party SSW holds two seats in the German Bundestag.
Yellow was already the main colour of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation. Just check Wiki and you will see how the flag evolved since around AD900
The Yellow represents Gold and the wealth generated from trade. The Red represents the blood spilled in War and the Black represents the abundance of Coal found in German lands.
Pre-unified Germany, or whatever it would be better to call it, has been on my reading list for so long, and has been leapfrogged by so many other topics, that I am glad that I had the chance to take this very well put together 40 minutes to listen to your video while enjoying a hot bath (so little time to dedicate to just one thing). Wanting to know more, perhaps it will be only a short time until I get round to learning about this "properly". With thanks.
Germany taking Alsace (and some of Lorraine) from 1871 to the end of WW1 would have been worth a mention. And Schleswig ain't Schleeswig. Otherwise, very interesting. It's a complicated history, and your explanation was helpful.
@@drychaf As far as Alsace and Lorraine are concerned, that was a bone of contention between France and the Germans going back to the Thirty Year's War during the 17th century when France decided to seize German territory for themselves. Both Alsace and Lorraine had been German kingdoms up to that point. After France's defeat in the Franco-Prussian War in 1871, the Germans then decided to incorporate both into Germany being that they were populated by ethnic Germans, and had been German states before the Thirty Year's War. And just as an incidental mention, Schleswig in Danish is spelled Slesvig, and also as an incidental mention, Schleswig and Holstein were both seized by Denmark during the Thirty Year's War as well when King Christian IV decided to take a chunk of German territory. So, the seizure of Alsace and Lorraine and the taking of both Schleswig and Holstein had their origins during the Thirty Year's War and remained bones of contention between the Germans, France and Denmark until the second half of the 19th century when Prussia and Austria went to war with Denmark in 1864, and the Danes ceded Schleswig and Holstein to both countries upon their loss during that war(the Austrians lost their control over Holstein when they lost the Austro-Prussian War in 1866), and as mentioned previously, Alsace and Lorraine were incorporated into Germany after German unification occurred and upon France losing the Franco-Prussian War in 1871. Sweden also took advantage of the circumstance during the Thirty Year's War when the Swedish king Gustavus Adolphus got involved in the war and German territory was seized by the Swedes along the Baltic coast in Pomerania. Sweden lost the territory in Pomerania also in the 19th century during the Napoleonic Wars upon their siding with Napoleon, and wound up being on the losing side of the fence in that conflict.
@@Exoneos Actually, I would start German history from the moment they first made their appearance on the world stage, namely, when they came in contact with the Romans during the 2nd century B.C., and went to war with the tribes that the Romans called the Cimbri and Teutones. From that point onward, there was constant warfare between the two until the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 A.D. The Germans would go on to create their own civilization thereafter, its most prominent early manifestation being the empire of Charlemagne. Incidentally, the Germans were among the few groups who were able to defeat the Romans, and hold them at bay, the others being the Caledonians and the Parthians as the major antagonists.
@@berndlauert8179England predates Germany though, because East Frankia and Germany aren’t actually the same thing. And English identity is older than a German identity by centuries
@@sebe2255 East Frankia and Germany are the exact same thing referred to by different names in different eras. German identity already existed before the Roman Empire was taken over by Germanics.
@@Jether. Nope that is absolutely false. You are conflating German and Germanic (which also wasn’t actually an identity). A common mistake, especially from uninformed English speakers.
Now we need an equal video on Italian Unification so that non-Italians can know why Italy joined this war (known in Italy as the Third Independence War).
Let's go another banger sending love from Chi-Town Chicago Illinois love you my brother always looking forward to every video you post you are the G.O.A.T.
13:05 By German inheritance law, Maria Theresa was the last Habsburg and it was the Lorraines who ruled Austria after her ascension to the Austrian throne. The powerful German states were just bribed by her father to recognize that the rules didn't apply to the Austrian monarchy and she got to inherit all royal titles, despite it not being legal for another German state to do so (as far as I'm aware). Maybe you were trying to simplify it by not calling them the Habsburg-Lorraines. It's like calling the Russian tzars Romanov when Schleswig-Holstein-Gotorp, branch of Oldenburgs, came into power. Also like how there is no House of Windsor, it was renamed during WWI because of anti-German sentiment when at the time the UK royal family were of the Saxe-Coburg and Gotha lineage. King Charles III of the house of Windsor is really King Charles III from the house of [Schleswig-Holstein-Gotorp-]Glücksburg, which is also a branch of the Oldenburgs. The Oldenburgs were like Habsburgs, but low key and less inbreeding. Most people in Europe have a claim to some crown if they got to decide what ancestors they get to inherit titles from. I'm excluding most areas that were once a part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth where after a while, everybody was basically nobility because all children inherited their father's titles, not just primogeniture. If one duke had 5 sons, and all of his sons had 5 sons (all living to adulthood) that would mean in the span of 3 generations, 30 more dukes were created.* *I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've studied the PLC.
You are fully right with Maria Theresa, she is last Habsburg and she also was only Archduchess of Austria and her husband was proclaimed Emperor of HRE. Then her son Joseph II was Emperor and kind of co-archduke (there was a pause as her husband Francis von Lothringen ruled after Charles von Wittelsbach - her sister husband. But I might be wrong as I feel awfull with names haha). Maria Theresa and Joseph II are very important to PLC history, so I like to learn about both of them. Nobility in PLC was quite unique as it was also 10% of society and wasm't only the wealthiest as some nobles were as poor as a peasant. Also it is hard to call them dukes or barons, or even lords. They owned land, but most often they bought it, got it from rulers, inherited it. Funny thing is that one of PLC kings Stanisław Leszczyński inherited a title after Francis von Lothringen and become a duke of Lotharingia. But I might be not right as for example nobles in Grand Duchy of Lithuania sometimes were known as dukes (some of Radziwiłłs come to my mind). But most nobles were known as wojewoda (voivod or provincial governorns) and they recieved other titles like hetman or chancelor (Chancelor of Grand Duchy of Lithuania).
@ozyrysozi6186 I wonder if the Wittelsbachs regret not trading Bavaria for Austrian Belgium? They might still be a monarchy. I don't think the French get enough blame for WWI. Alsace and northern Lotharingen were mostly German when the GE took the area in 1871. They were looking for a way to get the area back. France wasn't punished at all for the Napoleonic. They sure demanded revenge when they were on the winning side.
@@NorthernXY I mean, even after German Unification there were still kings and dukes under the Kaiser. But yeah, maybe. As for how they treated France after Napoleon I - I mean, it was a smart move in my opinion. France was still the number one military in Europe and was also one of a great powers - punishing them when they claim they fought with tyrant and usurper would be awful. It is also worth remembering that last 100 days of Napoleon were a bit different - Coalition declared war, but on Napoleon, not France as it was already a monarchy under Louis XVIII Burbon. But Metternich worked hard to cut France, British also wanted it away from Low Countries, Italy and German Confederation. Punishing them would again destabilise Europe and destroy Balance of Powers that Congress of Vienna was fighting for - unification of Germany and Italy will destroy the balance as Austria will also fall far from it's grace. But yes, Alsace and part of Lorrain was very German, but also - was important region for industrialization. It was part of HRE for a long time and partly lost to France only by Thirty Years War, yet region still remaind pretty germanised. And as for WWI - there are many sides to blame and it involves UK and France also, they weren't saints either, so I agree with that.
@ozyrysozi6186 With the Wittelsbachs re-owning parts of the Lowlands, Belgium, after the Napoleonic Wars. They would have had less reason to join the GE and remain constitutional kings like today. Probably would retain their title after WWI unlike the GE and AHE.
I'm aware of how it turned into Europe vs the not French Frenchman and not the French people/France. French revanche is what got them into WWI (Alsace-Lorraine) by including themselves in Russian "protectorship" of Slavs and the Orthodox church. So when the AHE declared war on Serbia (I need to read a lot more about all this), the Russian Empire joined on the side of Serbia and GE on the AHE. France is allied with Russia to check central powers. Joins war for non-expansionist "reasons". Making an Eastern European/Balkan War (Bismarck totally called it) a Great War. After the War, France demands Alsace-Lorraine (with GE having land taken away and AHE disappearing) and occupies German Rhine land to extract the revenue as payback. Establishing the ultimate international rule "It's only okay when we do."
This is why so many European royal families ultimately trace back to Germany: with so many little kingdoms and principalities, it was a great place to go spouse-shppping for a prince or princess. You could get 'em in bulk.
@@chriskoch1241 Nearly ever European royal house has German blood in them which makes things all the more tragic when it comes to the many wars that have taken place in Europe over the centuries. One could say it was a German civil war when it came to the European royal families pitted against each other.
What's going on with Holland's geography? There's a landmass across the Southern Sea that never existed... There's a dam now (still called a 'dijk' in Dutch as it was intented for poldering), but that was built in the late 1920s.
@@GBOAC There are literally always Dutch people whinging about a random polder either being absent or being present when it shouldn’t be. And most of the time the coastline is not correct in these videos because it changed a lot over the hundreds of years that the video covers and no one can be bothered to reflect that when the video isn’t about it
@@sebe2255 If you can’t tolerate feedback from other viewers, then you should maybe stay out of the comment section. As giving feedback that might aggravate people is one thing, it still relates to the content. You then starting an argument about the fact you can’t live with it is not related to the content at all. You’re basically whining about others supposedly whining.
I appreciate how this documentary includes the voices of historians and archaeologists. It adds depth to the narrative and highlights ongoing discoveries.
The constantly wrong pronounciation of "Schleswig" gets a bit irritating, though (given that one third of the video is about it and it's said very, very often in the video. Mind you, I'm not expecting perfect german from an Engish speaker, but it's a bit like if instead of "Brunswick", people would say "Brinswuck" all the effing time. He basically said "Schlisweg" instead of Schleswig". Yes, I know, it's a more or less common mistake of English speakers, based on their peculiar pronounciation of "i" and "e", but neverthelass quite annoying, because they are all so completely unaware of the fact that these two letters are pronounced in a different way - not only in German, but in most other (European) languages as well (French, Italian, Spanish - just to name a few).
Every language pronounces words from others in their own phonetics it's not an English problem it's a language barrier issue. It's not a one-way street although since this is history done on Germany it would make sense for clearer pronunciation but expecting every non native to learn pronunciations is a bit much considering not every has the same goal in said language.
Right? My ears were bleeding by 15 minutes into this! If I was going to record a video about a foreign country, I would at least look up the pronunciation of words I was going to say 100 times.
When people in the US try to imply that European is so much more cultured/diplomatic/peaceful than the US, I just refer them to the huge list of wars and conflicts.
@@theposeidon6266 A point of clarification- when I said we keep shooting each other I was referring to the apparently unstoppable mass shootings we Americans inflict on each other. Not so cultured and peaceful on our part. To your comment I would ask: how many of America’s then enemies were rebuilt with American aid thus turning enemies into allies? The Marshall Plan was an unprecedented doctrine in human history that rebuilt friend and foe alike. Related to this was the cost of the Truman Doctrine which successfully allowed European countries a conflict free era which endured until Russian aggression against Ukraine.
yes Russia and Denmark have been great allies several times in history I think it was only due to Denmark fighting with Sweden to keep Finland out of the hands of Russia once there was a conflict, until the communist killed the Czar, as the mother of the Czar was Danish that created another conflict and the whole cold war thing, today however Denmark like other European nations is just vassal of the USA that means conflict with Russia and whomever the USA decide is the enemy of the day China, Iran, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba ect.
I heard that as well. The same common butchery of German like he keep doing with 'SchlEswig'. I guess the majority will never learn to pronounce non-English properly.
@@KonradvonHotzendorf Debatable. The Byzantine emperors was also crowned by the pope's equivalent in the East: the patriarch of Constantinopel. Ultimately it was "god" who chose the emperor.
"Let me tell you about German history" *proceeds to skip 2,000 years* The Holy Roman Empire and the area was considered Germany since Roman time and before that the native tribes understood themselves as of one people.
@hollywoodnoire On November 11, 1918, the Provisional National Assembly declared the German-Austrian Republic and passed the law on the form of state and government of German-Austria. They described the new state as a "democratic republic" (Article 1), which, according to Article 2, was to be "part of the German Republic". On September 10, 1919, in the Treaty of Saint-Germain, Austria had to agree to the state name Republic of Austria demanded by the victorious powers of the First World War instead of the self-chosen state name German-Austria and to full sovereignty vis-à-vis the German Republic, otherwise no treaty would have been concluded. The originally self-chosen state name and the intention to be part of the German Republic were thus banned, and only lasted for about a year, because the changes demanded by the victorious powers were passed by law on October 21, 1919.
Because Prussia only wanted to incorporate the German parts of the then multi-ethnic Austrian Empire. This would have meant that Austria would have had to give up a large part of its empire, which of course it did not do.
It's not that Prussia took over terretories in the HRE, but after the 30 years war the elector of Brandenburg, Friedrich Willhelm, later called the great, gained Prussia by treaties with Poland. His son wanted to have King title, but was not allowed due to HRE rules, so called himself King IN (not of) Prussia. F-W. also launched the reforms (immigration of French calvinists, education for all, military) that lead to the rise of Prussia almost 100 years later. Brandenburg-Prussia was born out of the ashes and devastation of the 30 years war. The other important period was the napoleonic wars. Prussia had a very weak king, got crushingly defeated by Napoleon, so Queen Luise and reformer von Stein, reshaped Prussia once again to a industrial power it would be under Bismarck during the 2nd schleswig war.
Pennsylvania was heavily settled by Germans. So much so that a town about 10 miles outside of Philadelphia is named King of Prussia. One of the largest shopping malls in the United States is located in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
There are 4 German Reich 1) first Reich ( Holy Roman Empire of German Nation) 2) Second Reich ( German Empire, also includes Weimar Republic) 3) third Reich ( N Germany) 4) Fourth Reich ( Current, Federal Republic of Germany)
"Second Reich", Weimar Republic and "Third Reich" were actually the same entity (the "German Empire"), just under different constitutions. The Federal Republic of Germany was established as a separate entity.
@@Bln-f9u wrong, Second Reich ( including Weimar Republic) is different from " third Reich" . "Third Reich " was N Germany Because N Germany had Austria also Third Reich was from 1934-45. After that divided Germany And then "fourth Reich" ( current Germany) That's why it's different. N Germany was not German Empire Austrian Painter was not " Kaiser" he was " leader"
@@Theworldsucks-kg5jv Actually Judah was right. Nazi Germany was just the Weimar Republic under different leadership. Hitler officially was its chancellor and president. He was just called "Führer" but his successor Karl Dönitz was president again.
My family started (though my father) doing a family history. It was pretty easy until we got to the German part, then it became a bit more difficult, but we have gotten back Into the 1700s to 1600s. It is extremely interesting. The family immigrated from Germany to Ireland, just after the "Potato Famine" (1860s) then onto Pennsylvania, where my great grandfather family moved to. This history helps me understand what was going on during part of their history and why they may have left Germany in the first place.
Considering England and France formed in the medieval period, it's odd that Germany didn't arise until the 19th century. Obviously, the various German states and duchies were similar linguistically and culturally. Norway, Sweden, and Denmark formed in the medieval period also.
@@Trecesolotienesdos That is one of the peculiarities of European history in that the Germans were the last group to create a unified nation state. You would think that being in the center of the continent where they have had enemies on all sides of their borders that they would have founded a single political entity amongst themselves to counter that. The fact that the Germans were fractured into all of those diminutive states during all of that time, and not completely taken over by outsiders is a miracle in and of itself when you think of it.
And you would think that German unification would've occurred during the Middle Ages like the other European states considering their vulnerability at being in the middle of the continent with hostile neighbors on all sides.
Well Germans were already unified in the Holy Roman Empire. Which was sometimes referred to as “of the German Nation” so a united German state did exist in the medieval and post medieval period
@@sebe2255 The Holy Roman Emperor was a nominal figure who wielded little power over the German states. Unlike the early United States which was a loose federation with the states exercising autonomy, the various German states had actual independence with each having their own government, army, currency and each conducting their own foreign policy. If any disputes arose between any of the monarchs and governments of the various states, the Holy Roman Emperor could be asked upon to act as an arbiter to mediate those disputes in that event. Unification came in 1871 upon France's defeat in the Franco-Prussian War, and Prussia acting as the unifier over all of the German states with the King of Prussia being proclaimed as the German emperor and chief of state and the chancellor as the head of government. The various German states were given autonomy which made Germany a federal monarchy.
@@douglasschliewen4302 This decentralisation applies to all feudal medieval states though. The early HRE is no different from France or England in that sense. The development of decentralisation with de facto independence only takes place in the later third of its history. And regardless it was still a single “German” political entity which was identified as such. And it isn’t like the Emperor had no authority or competences Political unification in one nation states happens in 1871 (or at least three if you count Switzerland and Austria). But there had been an explicitly German state foe centuries So it isn’t like the concept of Germany or German is as new as people pretend
@@thorstenguenther Bismarck Should have seen how every State of HRE and Ottoman Empire had fought The whole HRE was involved in Turkish Austrian ( or Ottoman Habsburg) wars
Alsace -Lorraine was actually part of Holy Roman Empire but became part of Kingdom of France Later this Kingdom of France saw Revolution in 1789 Also this HRE also was dissolved succeeded by German Confederation and this was succeeded by German Empire ( Imperial Germany)
I was in Paris for the Olympics. I visited the Arc de Triomphe. I found the entire monument a bit grotesque. A celebration of everything Napoleon, who channeled the energy of the Revolution into the Grande Armee that rampaged across, wait for it! Germany! A bunch of city-states, duchies, and farms minding their own business. With this aggression, and with Nappy III's aggression, the Germans naturally decided they better unify into one nation and Army up. Yes, Germany under the Kaiser Reich in WW1 and under Hitler in WW2 was a monster. But who was the Victor Frankenstein who created this monster? Napoleon Bonaparte.
The German empire was one of the greatest empires on Earth but they had no idea what to do with it - they lost two world wars and are now just Germany!
1:20 the summary up to this point was alright. but claiming 'the German unification will happen through a series of war _carefully planned and executed by Prussia_ .' makes it sound as if Prussia had a master plan of uniting Germany and planned all these wars beforehand to get its way. that is utter rubbish! yes, there were three wars between 1864 and 1871 before unification happened. all were won by Prussia. that doesn't mean they were 'carefully planned and executed by Prussia'. the other actors weren't just puppets on a string. they had their own agenda and followed them ruthlessly. Denmark made a grave error of judgement first. the Austrians had their own ideas of how things ought to work and the Napoleon III was a warmongering megalomaniac (just look at his involvement in the Italian wars of unification) who had it coming.
As a native of Holstein, I think 99% of people here have no idea we were briefly ruled by Austria 160 years ago. It's a minor detail that disappears in the bigger confusing picture.
Do you think people know that Hannover was ruled by Britain 180 years ago?
@@SimonDman other way around or not`?
@@mrhonigkuchen2649 well it ended in 1837 because of Victoria's accession, as Semi-Salic law prevented a woman to rule Hanover. So how would it be the other way around?
Support #techandtalesofindia
@@SimonDmanhow can you say they were ruled by Britain when the house that ruled was called house of Hannover 😂 if anything it would be the other way around lol. What you mean if that they were both under the same king.
Narration suggestion: when mentioning dates, drop the year in there now and then. Doing so helps anchor events in the listener’s mind. A long series of “15 May, then 20 October, then 13 November, then 17 December”, etc., causes the listener to lose track of the year. The years are more important anyway.
Hell ya. I don't recall year being mentioned at all cept at the very start. I have no idea what year it is when vid concludes. 1880's ? If not .. when?
I'd also suggest having the year on the map of large changes to area. Makes it easier to remember when these changes happened and over what timespan. Would add some useful context when trying to take in the information.
Or like an inbetween frame, where it pauzes and points to a new transition with year mentioned
No the years are not more important - the order of events is far more important than the year .. in the spring this happened, in the summer that happend, then in the fall this happened, then everybody took a break for winter and in april everybody started fighting again for year 2 .. throw a visual transition from year xxxx to year yyyy and keep talking .. "during the reign of frederick" is all you need to know .. 'fred died and william and otto von bismark took over' .. at some point he mentioned 1864 which was during the US Civil War .. 1866 was the creation of the Northern German Confederation .. the southern german states joined in 1871 .. the German Empire was created in 1871 .. the first Dano-Prussian War over schlesswig was 1848 to 1852 .. the Second Dano-Prussian War over schlesswig was feb 1864 .. it ended in oct 1864 .. takes less than 2 minutes to find that info .. do some research ..
Well when a mummy Germany and a daddy Germany love each other very much...
oversimplified!!
They 'adopt' a Polish kid?
They invade France.
Anschluss, ja?
@@josepharte Austria was also adopted.
Interesting fact that the place where Prussia was established is not part of Germany now
Nor back then
@Siegbert85 it was. It was a region called east Prussia
@@CCrux-yt Back during HRE times, I meant.
Now it's in firm Russian hands: Königsberg = Kaliningrad.
@@douglasschliewen4302 "handed over" is quite an euphemism for stolen
Why is German history so darn interesting? 😅
It’s so unique
@@SaikaLiao fr
Geograficly: it's the Center of europe
Ethnicly: it's a wide Mix of europeans with an intense allegiance to their German heritage
Historical: germans are involved in the history of a lot of countrys all over the World (France, Russia, Britan, Spain, Greec, Brazil, Argentinia, USA eg)
U know why 😌....
Honestly every country has a unique history. It's just how it was presented to others
Germany's history from the HRE to the German Empire and now the Federal Republic of Germany is quite interesting on the formation of one of the most influencial nations.
dont forget the Church.
@dinofangzz Herrn Schicklgruber? :)
@dinofangzz the Weimar Republic ofc
@@Mr.IncrediblisNaz
@@Ziexywho cryyyy
Interesting note, the UK was on Denmark's side while Hanover on the German Confederation's side. Eleven years prior the two kingdoms of Hanover and UK were ruled by the same person. Hooray for feudalism.
too funny
And Queen Victoria picked the new Prince of Hanover in time for the First World War (which put an English Duke on the German side).
(Look up the Dukedom of Albany).
@@allangibson8494I believe that Edward, the Duke of Albany, was chosen by Victoria to become the Prince of Coburg, not Hanover. Her nearest male relative and his descendants became the rulers of Hanover upon her accession to the throne in 1837. Coburg was where her consort, Prince Albert, was from, and she wanted to continue his memory by selecting Coburg's ruler. When Edward became the Prince of Coburg, he had to give his allegiance to the Kaiser upon doing so, and give his support to Germany during WWI. When Hitler took over in 1933, Edward became a member of the Nazi Party, and he wound up doing Hitler's bidding. As a result of all this activity, he was ostracized by the members of the British Royal family, and would never be able to step onto British soil again. He had to watch Queen Elizabeth's coronation on film from afar in Coburg. To this day, no member of the Royal family has made a visit to Coburg.
@@allangibson8494 And as an addendum to what I mentioned before, since the Kaiser was also a grandson of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert, that made Edward and the Kaiser cousins to one another with one royal cousin merely giving allegiance to another royal cousin in another country and, therefore, keeping allegiance within the family as it were.
@@douglasschliewen4302 Edward was stripped of his British titles in 1917.
Should have talked about the Napoleonic Wars and the German mediatisation instead. Napoleon's France took German lands up to the Rhine, and the Imperial crown had to compensate remaining nobles by effectively consolidating the innumerable tiny independent states into the larger blocs we see at the start of the Victorian age. That's when all the bishoprics, small counties and free states that you see in medieval maps disappeared, and is far less talked about than Bismarck's unification.
This channel is anglo so it will always be biased and frustrated towards france
@@smal750 The channel is from Rumania (atleast the channel information location shows)
@@Janoip
Its not
True, Napoleon was more important for German unification, than Bismarck was. Even wasn't Napoleons intention, the Code Civil also played a huge role as a role model for creating the modern German law system, that was drafted under Bismarck
@@tobiasharstel7941 Napoleon was above all an external threat, the dead and his rule drove the small states together to free themselves from the occupation & suppression.
Napoleon's military conquests and the associated occupations led to significant burdens for the affected areas. Especially after the Battle of Nations near Leipzig in 1813, an intense hatred of Napoleon and the French developed, which dominated the German view of France throughout the 19th century. His military campaigns and harsh occupation policies resulted in considerable losses and suffering in the occupied territories, contributing to his perception as a brutal ruler.
But yes also in part as Reformer
Austrian painter after 75 years lose half of Prussia to Poland
Prussias most important city is now part of Russia
@@aAverageFanso sad
Oh him again, lol
@@aAverageFan But Russian authorities are now trying to rebuild the historical parts of Königsberg that were either destroyed during the war or after and replaced with Soviet/Marxist concrete coffins etc.
@@victorsamsung2921 Better still,how about handing it back to it's rightful owners.....
The presentation was absolutely fascinating to watch, the graphics were great, the narration was very clear. Understandable, I really enjoyed it, thank you.
Clear? What are you talking about?!
The presentation started in the middle ages, jumped to the XIX century, back to XV, then re-back to XIX!
I originally rewinded the video but then just let it go to the end.
All of this history was nothing but pure idiocy. But it helps me a lot knowing that Europeans are just as screwed up as Americans, despite the woke always pounding how better Europe is. This video is just a small sample of reality, and it lurks beneath the smooth European appearance.
So basically “Germany” was in nonstop war for almost a 100 years up until the end of WWII….. got it
Basically Germany manifested from all the infighting of the Holy Roman Empire.
those 100 years were the most peaceful in european history up until that point
@@berndlauert8179 , riiiigghhhttt….. Because the pissed off frenchman was gone ? I guess you forgot about a little European skirmish known as WWI …
@@mikevader1988 WW1 was not fought on German soil.
@@berndlauert8179 umm you said “European “ not German… but I’m sure German soil is pretty boss tho
When I grew up in the 1960's in peaceful and wealthy Southern Germany nothing could be seen of anything that had happened earlier except the ruins of a 1000-year old castle...
Would it be false to say, Southern Germany STILL is peaceful and wealthy ?
(notwithstanding the Divine Law that earlier everything was better, especially sex :) )
@@joeybruIf nothing else Southern Germany looked much more beautiful in the 60s
@@sebe2255 maybe, just maybe *anything* looks better through the eyes of youth…? ;)
@@joeybruRose tinted/nostalgia glasses.
Worthwhile mentioning that when Germany was so fractured particularly in the Middle Ages it was actually far easier for the emperor to rule over it since there was no strong and united opposition to this power.
Good content but chaotic pronunciation. Best to just look it up on google before narrating an entire video.
So did all this happen 1 year? Over a period of 10 years? 50 years? What?? When were they officially a German empire?? You need to mention dates of these events, or at least years.
1812 disbanding HRE, 1867 north german confederation, 1871 German empire
@@Spungmangett Right on! Unsung heroes exist!
@@Spungmangett The Holy Roman Empire ended in August 1806 when Francis II. laid down the imperial crown (without consent from the other princes and electors) because he feared the entire HRE, and by extension his Habsburg core domains, could fall into Napoleon's hands. De facto the Empire was already finished a month earlier when a number of German states joined Napoleon's Confederation of the Rhine, which also resulted in the elevation of Bavaria and Württemberg to kingdoms.
Prussia was kinda a precursor to Germany. It's far more complicated than that but even up to WW1 the English and French called them Prussians and they had a very similar flag
The German empire formed during /after the Franco Prussian war(when Prussia and its allies took Paris) that’s why there is the famous painting with all the German leaders in Paris.
German history is so interesting because it was formed by Blood and Steel
you mean backstabbing treachory and the murder of thousands all,for impereal power sad real,one mans delusions still have repercusions
at leat the empire from 1871.
@@LamiNalchor Actually goes as far nack as the Teutonic knights and the formation of the Duchy of Prussia
@@johnmorales6281 This is one more example. There are no other examples out of the ordinary. The Teutonic knights ultimately were utterly defeated and ruled by Poland and later Poland-Lithuania. So, violence yes, but not even a success.
@@LamiNalchor True but remember the first ruler of the Duchy of Prussia was the head of the order when he was in power
Thanks!
Thank you too!!
Finally a sane soul whose just happy to watch instead of immature professor of language correction maniacs who likes to find small mistakes on everything
Nice video!
Good Video. I want to note: during the first Schleswig -Holstein war Sweden and Norway (then the united kingdom of Sweden and Norway) fought to a degree on the side of Denmark. That said, 90% of the troops involved in the fighting were Danish, but the combo of some troops and supply support was probably part of why Denmark won the first conflict. After WW1 Denmark given an offer by the victorious allies to take back Schleswig, but instead only took back the Northern half of Schleswig, the part that had a Danish majority, and this is the border between Denmark and Germany to this day.
Additionally, the exact border was confirmed through plebiscites in the border municipalities, so even the fucking Nazis did not dare alter the border one centimeter. Currently, the Danish minority party SSW holds two seats in the German Bundestag.
I really like your documentaries, but for the love of god could you pronounce Schleswig as Schleswig and not Schiiiswig.
Yep, had to stop listening. That was painful.
HolsstEin was painful too, but Schliiswig killed me after 8 minutes in
And Holstein als Holstein and not Howlsdien.
Finally! I havent had a new video on my feed for 8 hrs now 😅
How many subscriptions you have?
@@blackholedividedbyzero about 220-230
@@DollarGeneral_Is_a_Plagueyou are a literal npc m, you make npc comments and have way too many subscriptions that’s it’s genuinely sad
@@Livinghopefulandhonest I didn't know having a broad library of content made me an NPC. Hmmm I am on yt a lot tho 🤷
@@DollarGeneral_Is_a_Plague you literally admitted it yourself
Can you please explain how the colour yellow was added to the German flag. Abd also what the three colours symbolise. Thank you.
Yellow was already the main colour of the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation. Just check Wiki and you will see how the flag evolved since around AD900
The Yellow represents Gold and the wealth generated from trade. The Red represents the blood spilled in War and the Black represents the abundance of Coal found in German lands.
Nice video.
Pre-unified Germany, or whatever it would be better to call it, has been on my reading list for so long, and has been leapfrogged by so many other topics, that I am glad that I had the chance to take this very well put together 40 minutes to listen to your video while enjoying a hot bath (so little time to dedicate to just one thing).
Wanting to know more, perhaps it will be only a short time until I get round to learning about this "properly".
With thanks.
Germany taking Alsace (and some of Lorraine) from 1871 to the end of WW1 would have been worth a mention. And Schleswig ain't Schleeswig.
Otherwise, very interesting. It's a complicated history, and your explanation was helpful.
@@drychaf As far as Alsace and Lorraine are concerned, that was a bone of contention between France and the Germans going back to the Thirty Year's War during the 17th century when France decided to seize German territory for themselves. Both Alsace and Lorraine had been German kingdoms up to that point. After France's defeat in the Franco-Prussian War in 1871, the Germans then decided to incorporate both into Germany being that they were populated by ethnic Germans, and had been German states before the Thirty Year's War. And just as an incidental mention, Schleswig in Danish is spelled Slesvig, and also as an incidental mention, Schleswig and Holstein were both seized by Denmark during the Thirty Year's War as well when King Christian IV decided to take a chunk of German territory. So, the seizure of Alsace and Lorraine and the taking of both Schleswig and Holstein had their origins during the Thirty Year's War and remained bones of contention between the Germans, France and Denmark until the second half of the 19th century when Prussia and Austria went to war with Denmark in 1864, and the Danes ceded Schleswig and Holstein to both countries upon their loss during that war(the Austrians lost their control over Holstein when they lost the Austro-Prussian War in 1866), and as mentioned previously, Alsace and Lorraine were incorporated into Germany after German unification occurred and upon France losing the Franco-Prussian War in 1871. Sweden also took advantage of the circumstance during the Thirty Year's War when the Swedish king Gustavus Adolphus got involved in the war and German territory was seized by the Swedes along the Baltic coast in Pomerania. Sweden lost the territory in Pomerania also in the 19th century during the Napoleonic Wars upon their siding with Napoleon, and wound up being on the losing side of the fence in that conflict.
Nice vid. And also hello knowledgia! Ive been watching your videos since 2018! I only commented now because i was shy
8:00 whats the name of the song? 😅
I would have started the story of germany with East Frankia and the death of Charlemagne. For having an even big picture of how Germany came to be.
@@Exoneos Actually, I would start German history from the moment they first made their appearance on the world stage, namely, when they came in contact with the Romans during the 2nd century B.C., and went to war with the tribes that the Romans called the Cimbri and Teutones. From that point onward, there was constant warfare between the two until the fall of the Western Roman Empire in 476 A.D. The Germans would go on to create their own civilization thereafter, its most prominent early manifestation being the empire of Charlemagne. Incidentally, the Germans were among the few groups who were able to defeat the Romans, and hold them at bay, the others being the Caledonians and the Parthians as the major antagonists.
East Frankia has little to do with any early modern German state though
Awesome video! Love it!!!!
It's wild to think that Germany was united by the time America had already had it's centennial
And the Kingdom of England was only formed almost a century after the medieval Kingdom of Germany
@@berndlauert8179England predates Germany though, because East Frankia and Germany aren’t actually the same thing.
And English identity is older than a German identity by centuries
@@sebe2255 East Frankia and Germany are the exact same thing referred to by different names in different eras. German identity already existed before the Roman Empire was taken over by Germanics.
@sebe2255 Nope that's false. The German identity exist since Germania. Unified German country doesn't equal German identity/ies.
@@Jether. Nope that is absolutely false. You are conflating German and Germanic (which also wasn’t actually an identity). A common mistake, especially from uninformed English speakers.
My great great great grandfather came from the Hannover kingdom during this time to the brazilian empire. He arrived here in 1848.
I love the History of that time just as the Video. Thank you very much for it!
❤️
Can you please make a documentary on Sicily? Thanks.
Now we need an equal video on Italian Unification so that non-Italians can know why Italy joined this war (known in Italy as the Third Independence War).
What's the song at 6:00
If I were German I’d be pissed losing the Prussian lands.
My grandmother would probably agree. My family lost a lot.
They lost all of Poland in 1945 lol
Hey hey hey don't give them ideas
Well, a certain ex-corporal, wannabe painter with a moustache was
No problem, we still have that wonderfull dish of Königsberger Klopse. That is enough.
Fascinating military history, thank you 📚😊
Let's go another banger sending love from Chi-Town Chicago Illinois love you my brother always looking forward to every video you post you are the G.O.A.T.
I like your format. Good video!
nice video
@Knowledgia could you create a video about How was Italy Formed?
13:00 Radetzky March is playing which honors a Austrian field marshal, what a great detail!
13:05 By German inheritance law, Maria Theresa was the last Habsburg and it was the Lorraines who ruled Austria after her ascension to the Austrian throne. The powerful German states were just bribed by her father to recognize that the rules didn't apply to the Austrian monarchy and she got to inherit all royal titles, despite it not being legal for another German state to do so (as far as I'm aware). Maybe you were trying to simplify it by not calling them the Habsburg-Lorraines. It's like calling the Russian tzars Romanov when Schleswig-Holstein-Gotorp, branch of Oldenburgs, came into power.
Also like how there is no House of Windsor, it was renamed during WWI because of anti-German sentiment when at the time the UK royal family were of the Saxe-Coburg and Gotha lineage. King Charles III of the house of Windsor is really King Charles III from the house of [Schleswig-Holstein-Gotorp-]Glücksburg, which is also a branch of the Oldenburgs. The Oldenburgs were like Habsburgs, but low key and less inbreeding.
Most people in Europe have a claim to some crown if they got to decide what ancestors they get to inherit titles from. I'm excluding most areas that were once a part of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth where after a while, everybody was basically nobility because all children inherited their father's titles, not just primogeniture. If one duke had 5 sons, and all of his sons had 5 sons (all living to adulthood) that would mean in the span of 3 generations, 30 more dukes were created.*
*I could be wrong, it's been a while since I've studied the PLC.
You are fully right with Maria Theresa, she is last Habsburg and she also was only Archduchess of Austria and her husband was proclaimed Emperor of HRE. Then her son Joseph II was Emperor and kind of co-archduke (there was a pause as her husband Francis von Lothringen ruled after Charles von Wittelsbach - her sister husband. But I might be wrong as I feel awfull with names haha).
Maria Theresa and Joseph II are very important to PLC history, so I like to learn about both of them.
Nobility in PLC was quite unique as it was also 10% of society and wasm't only the wealthiest as some nobles were as poor as a peasant. Also it is hard to call them dukes or barons, or even lords. They owned land, but most often they bought it, got it from rulers, inherited it. Funny thing is that one of PLC kings Stanisław Leszczyński inherited a title after Francis von Lothringen and become a duke of Lotharingia. But I might be not right as for example nobles in Grand Duchy of Lithuania sometimes were known as dukes (some of Radziwiłłs come to my mind). But most nobles were known as wojewoda (voivod or provincial governorns) and they recieved other titles like hetman or chancelor (Chancelor of Grand Duchy of Lithuania).
@ozyrysozi6186 I wonder if the Wittelsbachs regret not trading Bavaria for Austrian Belgium? They might still be a monarchy.
I don't think the French get enough blame for WWI. Alsace and northern Lotharingen were mostly German when the GE took the area in 1871. They were looking for a way to get the area back. France wasn't punished at all for the Napoleonic. They sure demanded revenge when they were on the winning side.
@@NorthernXY I mean, even after German Unification there were still kings and dukes under the Kaiser. But yeah, maybe.
As for how they treated France after Napoleon I - I mean, it was a smart move in my opinion. France was still the number one military in Europe and was also one of a great powers - punishing them when they claim they fought with tyrant and usurper would be awful. It is also worth remembering that last 100 days of Napoleon were a bit different - Coalition declared war, but on Napoleon, not France as it was already a monarchy under Louis XVIII Burbon. But Metternich worked hard to cut France, British also wanted it away from Low Countries, Italy and German Confederation. Punishing them would again destabilise Europe and destroy Balance of Powers that Congress of Vienna was fighting for - unification of Germany and Italy will destroy the balance as Austria will also fall far from it's grace.
But yes, Alsace and part of Lorrain was very German, but also - was important region for industrialization. It was part of HRE for a long time and partly lost to France only by Thirty Years War, yet region still remaind pretty germanised.
And as for WWI - there are many sides to blame and it involves UK and France also, they weren't saints either, so I agree with that.
@ozyrysozi6186 With the Wittelsbachs re-owning parts of the Lowlands, Belgium, after the Napoleonic Wars. They would have had less reason to join the GE and remain constitutional kings like today. Probably would retain their title after WWI unlike the GE and AHE.
I'm aware of how it turned into Europe vs the not French Frenchman and not the French people/France. French revanche is what got them into WWI (Alsace-Lorraine) by including themselves in Russian "protectorship" of Slavs and the Orthodox church. So when the AHE declared war on Serbia (I need to read a lot more about all this), the Russian Empire joined on the side of Serbia and GE on the AHE. France is allied with Russia to check central powers. Joins war for non-expansionist "reasons". Making an Eastern European/Balkan War (Bismarck totally called it) a Great War.
After the War, France demands Alsace-Lorraine (with GE having land taken away and AHE disappearing) and occupies German Rhine land to extract the revenue as payback. Establishing the ultimate international rule "It's only okay when we do."
This is why so many European royal families ultimately trace back to Germany: with so many little kingdoms and principalities, it was a great place to go spouse-shppping for a prince or princess. You could get 'em in bulk.
@@chriskoch1241 Nearly ever European royal house has German blood in them which makes things all the more tragic when it comes to the many wars that have taken place in Europe over the centuries. One could say it was a German civil war when it came to the European royal families pitted against each other.
@@douglasschliewen4302 Exactly! They had to have known each other well, one would think
Wow this was the best ! Thanks
"The Holy Roman Empire could neither be considered 'holy', nor 'Roman', nor an 'empire'."
- Voltaire, 1756
reddit tier comment
Excellent tutorial of the making of the German Republic!..Salute!
What's going on with Holland's geography? There's a landmass across the Southern Sea that never existed... There's a dam now (still called a 'dijk' in Dutch as it was intented for poldering), but that was built in the late 1920s.
That is what made me doubt the whole map
The real answer is that no one cares about portraying the changes in the Dutch coastline over centuries of video content
@@sebe2255 most history channels do feature the correct coastline, so I would suspect you're venting your contrarian personality.
@@GBOAC There are literally always Dutch people whinging about a random polder either being absent or being present when it shouldn’t be.
And most of the time the coastline is not correct in these videos because it changed a lot over the hundreds of years that the video covers and no one can be bothered to reflect that when the video isn’t about it
@@sebe2255 If you can’t tolerate feedback from other viewers, then you should maybe stay out of the comment section. As giving feedback that might aggravate people is one thing, it still relates to the content. You then starting an argument about the fact you can’t live with it is not related to the content at all. You’re basically whining about others supposedly whining.
I appreciate how this documentary includes the voices of historians and archaeologists. It adds depth to the narrative and highlights ongoing discoveries.
The constantly wrong pronounciation of "Schleswig" gets a bit irritating, though (given that one third of the video is about it and it's said very, very often in the video. Mind you, I'm not expecting perfect german from an Engish speaker, but it's a bit like if instead of "Brunswick", people would say "Brinswuck" all the effing time. He basically said "Schlisweg" instead of Schleswig". Yes, I know, it's a more or less common mistake of English speakers, based on their peculiar pronounciation of "i" and "e", but neverthelass quite annoying, because they are all so completely unaware of the fact that these two letters are pronounced in a different way - not only in German, but in most other (European) languages as well (French, Italian, Spanish - just to name a few).
Every language pronounces words from others in their own phonetics it's not an English problem it's a language barrier issue. It's not a one-way street although since this is history done on Germany it would make sense for clearer pronunciation but expecting every non native to learn pronunciations is a bit much considering not every has the same goal in said language.
Right? My ears were bleeding by 15 minutes into this! If I was going to record a video about a foreign country, I would at least look up the pronunciation of words I was going to say 100 times.
When people in the US try to imply that European is so much more cultured/diplomatic/peaceful than the US, I just refer them to the huge list of wars and conflicts.
Could be because we keep shooting each other?
yeah how about after WW2? how many countries were destroyed because of US? i have also a long list..😅😅
@@theposeidon6266 A point of clarification- when I said we keep shooting each other I was referring to the apparently unstoppable mass shootings we Americans inflict on each other. Not so cultured and peaceful on our part.
To your comment I would ask: how many of America’s then enemies were rebuilt with American aid thus turning enemies into allies? The Marshall Plan was an unprecedented doctrine in human history that rebuilt friend and foe alike. Related to this was the cost of the Truman Doctrine which successfully allowed European countries a conflict free era which endured until Russian aggression against Ukraine.
So sad to see those nations didn't even exist in its current shape when football was invented, and now England can't beat any of them...
Detail at 30:15: the town of Wörth am Rhein is marked, but the battle on 6 aug 1870 took place near Woerth sur la Sauer south of Wissembourg.
After watching this ancient history documentary, I'm convinced I was an ancient historian in a past life… or maybe just a really curious cat
Ancient? 1848?
Hi Knowledgia
Cool video, this is definitely one of the most interesting and important moments in world history
6:54... Russia and Denmark, huh? :P
yes Russia and Denmark have been great allies several times in history I think it was only due to Denmark fighting with Sweden to keep Finland out of the hands of Russia once there was a conflict, until the communist killed the Czar, as the mother of the Czar was Danish that created another conflict and the whole cold war thing, today however Denmark like other European nations is just vassal of the USA that means conflict with Russia and whomever the USA decide is the enemy of the day China, Iran, Libya, Iraq, Afghanistan, North Korea, Venezuela, Cuba ect.
I heard that as well. The same common butchery of German like he keep doing with 'SchlEswig'. I guess the majority will never learn to pronounce non-English properly.
Bro I learn more history form RUclips than I do from school
I declare myself the Emperor of The Holy Roman Empire
me too
Sweet, but you are 25 years late 😂😂
@@DruckerYTA Mischling
Title belongs to the Byzantine Emperor. Da Pope had no legitimate way to crown Karl Roman Emperor
@@KonradvonHotzendorf Debatable. The Byzantine emperors was also crowned by the pope's equivalent in the East: the patriarch of Constantinopel. Ultimately it was "god" who chose the emperor.
Wow you're actually right...well done usually there's some historical error but you nailed this one 👏💡 I liked this video Knowledgegia yes!!!!👍😅
Napoleon: You're welcome, Germans.
Love to see that video in 300 years later from now.... Just to remind y`all things are never settled to eternity.
"Let me tell you about German history" *proceeds to skip 2,000 years*
The Holy Roman Empire and the area was considered Germany since Roman time and before that the native tribes understood themselves as of one people.
Nö we liked each other just as little as we like each other today, but the times were more violent so that expressed more radically.
@@t.e.b.2565 yes lol but thats just Germans
I love your Videos they are so professionelly made ❤
Why Austria didn’t join Germany?
It is because the Allies didn't allow the unification of Germany and Austria
Austria also had plans to unite with Hungary, which was equally powerful as Austria
@hollywoodnoire On November 11, 1918, the Provisional National Assembly declared the German-Austrian Republic and passed the law on the form of state and government of German-Austria. They described the new state as a "democratic republic" (Article 1), which, according to Article 2, was to be "part of the German Republic". On September 10, 1919, in the Treaty of Saint-Germain, Austria had to agree to the state name Republic of Austria demanded by the victorious powers of the First World War instead of the self-chosen state name German-Austria and to full sovereignty vis-à-vis the German Republic, otherwise no treaty would have been concluded.
The originally self-chosen state name and the intention to be part of the German Republic were thus banned, and only lasted for about a year, because the changes demanded by the victorious powers were passed by law on October 21, 1919.
Because Prussia only wanted to incorporate the German parts of the then multi-ethnic Austrian Empire. This would have meant that Austria would have had to give up a large part of its empire, which of course it did not do.
"Bismark was a herring!" - Lili Von Shtupp
It's not that Prussia took over terretories in the HRE, but after the 30 years war the elector of Brandenburg, Friedrich Willhelm, later called the great, gained Prussia by treaties with Poland. His son wanted to have King title, but was not allowed due to HRE rules, so called himself King IN (not of) Prussia. F-W. also launched the reforms (immigration of French calvinists, education for all, military) that lead to the rise of Prussia almost 100 years later. Brandenburg-Prussia was born out of the ashes and devastation of the 30 years war. The other important period was the napoleonic wars. Prussia had a very weak king, got crushingly defeated by Napoleon, so Queen Luise and reformer von Stein, reshaped Prussia once again to a industrial power it would be under Bismarck during the 2nd schleswig war.
Pennsylvania was heavily settled by Germans. So much so that a town about 10 miles outside of Philadelphia is named King of Prussia. One of the largest shopping malls in the United States is located in King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
This season had a lot of great looking liveries, the grid was full of different colors, way more diverse than today.
There are 4 German Reich
1) first Reich ( Holy Roman Empire of German Nation)
2) Second Reich ( German Empire, also includes Weimar Republic)
3) third Reich ( N Germany)
4) Fourth Reich ( Current, Federal Republic of Germany)
Which isn't called "Reich"
"Second Reich", Weimar Republic and "Third Reich" were actually the same entity (the "German Empire"), just under different constitutions. The Federal Republic of Germany was established as a separate entity.
@@Bln-f9u wrong, Second Reich ( including Weimar Republic) is different from " third Reich" .
"Third Reich " was N Germany
Because N Germany had Austria also
Third Reich was from 1934-45. After that divided Germany
And then "fourth Reich" ( current Germany)
That's why it's different.
N Germany was not German Empire
Austrian Painter was not " Kaiser" he was " leader"
@@Theworldsucks-kg5jv Actually Judah was right. Nazi Germany was just the Weimar Republic under different leadership. Hitler officially was its chancellor and president.
He was just called "Führer" but his successor Karl Dönitz was president again.
@@Theworldsucks-kg5jv Yeah those were different constitutions and governmental systems, yet it was the "German Empire"?throughon out
Hey Fat B, Nice mapping 😆
they just went *yoink yoink yoink yoink yoink* but it was said in german
Joinka joinka joinka joinka
You said the treaty was ratified in Frankfurt, but you showed it in Berlin.
Man, butchered the pronunciations so bad. 🤣🤣🤣
It's like he went out of his way to pronounce them as badly as possible.
Interesting/informative/entertaining.
Ich liebe die Geschichte meines Vaterlandes.⚫🔴🟡
Bist du sicher, dass du sie kennst? 😉 🤔
My family started (though my father) doing a family history. It was pretty easy until we got to the German part, then it became a bit more difficult, but we have gotten back Into the 1700s to 1600s. It is extremely interesting. The family immigrated from Germany to Ireland, just after the "Potato Famine" (1860s) then onto Pennsylvania, where my great grandfather family moved to.
This history helps me understand what was going on during part of their history and why they may have left Germany in the first place.
Nice, the Netherlands is bigger
House of History has some excellent videos on all the major battles.
germany before ww1 is peak germany
Germany is a land made of steel and blood. That's means it grows and shrinks and grows and so on.
@@Itsme-xf7sxit has mostly just shrunk though
Considering England and France formed in the medieval period, it's odd that Germany didn't arise until the 19th century. Obviously, the various German states and duchies were similar linguistically and culturally. Norway, Sweden, and Denmark formed in the medieval period also.
@@Trecesolotienesdos That is one of the peculiarities of European history in that the Germans were the last group to create a unified nation state. You would think that being in the center of the continent where they have had enemies on all sides of their borders that they would have founded a single political entity amongst themselves to counter that. The fact that the Germans were fractured into all of those diminutive states during all of that time, and not completely taken over by outsiders is a miracle in and of itself when you think of it.
And you would think that German unification would've occurred during the Middle Ages like the other European states considering their vulnerability at being in the middle of the continent with hostile neighbors on all sides.
Well Germans were already unified in the Holy Roman Empire. Which was sometimes referred to as “of the German Nation” so a united German state did exist in the medieval and post medieval period
@@sebe2255 The Holy Roman Emperor was a nominal figure who wielded little power over the German states. Unlike the early United States which was a loose federation with the states exercising autonomy, the various German states had actual independence with each having their own government, army, currency and each conducting their own foreign policy. If any disputes arose between any of the monarchs and governments of the various states, the Holy Roman Emperor could be asked upon to act as an arbiter to mediate those disputes in that event. Unification came in 1871 upon France's defeat in the Franco-Prussian War, and Prussia acting as the unifier over all of the German states with the King of Prussia being proclaimed as the German emperor and chief of state and the chancellor as the head of government. The various German states were given autonomy which made Germany a federal monarchy.
@@douglasschliewen4302 This decentralisation applies to all feudal medieval states though. The early HRE is no different from France or England in that sense. The development of decentralisation with de facto independence only takes place in the later third of its history. And regardless it was still a single “German” political entity which was identified as such. And it isn’t like the Emperor had no authority or competences
Political unification in one nation states happens in 1871 (or at least three if you count Switzerland and Austria). But there had been an explicitly German state foe centuries
So it isn’t like the concept of Germany or German is as new as people pretend
Bismark should have taken Austria once defeated as part of the new federation
Q: how was germany formed ?
Ans: by combination 😅
They eventually realized there were three things that united them: sausages, sauerkraut and an unhealthy hatred for the French.
Kartoffeln🥔 too
US people like to eat Sauerkraut today for health reasons but they dont know how. Kind of funny. ☺️🤭
You think perhaps the German hatred of the French was justified because over the previous 400 years France had invaded German territory 40 times???
you have the risk universirails ahh map
however, AMAZING VIDEO
And now there are millions of Turks in the country
" The love between Turks and Germans is so old that it will never break." - Otto von Bismarck, August 1871.
@@thorstenguenther yea but not Turks disrupting the German populous
@@thorstenguenther Bismarck Should have seen how every State of HRE and Ottoman Empire had fought
The whole HRE was involved in Turkish Austrian ( or Ottoman Habsburg) wars
Is Alsace-Lorraine France or Germany?
Depends. What time is it?
Alsace -Lorraine was actually part of Holy Roman Empire but became part of Kingdom of France
Later this Kingdom of France saw Revolution in 1789
Also this HRE also was dissolved succeeded by German Confederation and this was succeeded by German Empire ( Imperial Germany)
Need to add some epic music
I’ve been waiting for a video like this about Germany! Thank you
Blut und Boden ⚡️🔱⚡️
hold on, question. why would France have gained control of Friuli in the Austro-Prussian war?
I was in Paris for the Olympics. I visited the Arc de Triomphe. I found the entire monument a bit grotesque. A celebration of everything Napoleon, who channeled the energy of the Revolution into the Grande Armee that rampaged across, wait for it! Germany! A bunch of city-states, duchies, and farms minding their own business. With this aggression, and with Nappy III's aggression, the Germans naturally decided they better unify into one nation and Army up.
Yes, Germany under the Kaiser Reich in WW1 and under Hitler in WW2 was a monster. But who was the Victor Frankenstein who created this monster?
Napoleon Bonaparte.
Germany has the historical imagination of the dragon !
Music makes it so hard to listen and focus
Can I get a like?
Bornholm not being danish annoys me
The German empire was one of the greatest empires on Earth but they had no idea what to do with it - they lost two world wars and are now just Germany!
As an American, this history is so alien yet fascinating.
its hard to tell the time frame of all this
so from a Mess to a BIGGER MESS. got it.
3:12 Sister 🇯🇵
1:20 the summary up to this point was alright. but claiming 'the German unification will happen through a series of war _carefully planned and executed by Prussia_ .' makes it sound as if Prussia had a master plan of uniting Germany and planned all these wars beforehand to get its way. that is utter rubbish!
yes, there were three wars between 1864 and 1871 before unification happened. all were won by Prussia. that doesn't mean they were 'carefully planned and executed by Prussia'. the other actors weren't just puppets on a string. they had their own agenda and followed them ruthlessly. Denmark made a grave error of judgement first. the Austrians had their own ideas of how things ought to work and the Napoleon III was a warmongering megalomaniac (just look at his involvement in the Italian wars of unification) who had it coming.