That is sure an amazing result. As you said there is (of course) a difference in the 416, but I'd say it sounds like the 875R punches above it's weight. Great in-depth comparison.
The 875 isn't perfect, but it's a LOT better than its price. Less detail in the highs, but ridiculously good. On the edge of being useful in a professional space, but absolutely solid in any content heading to a "compressed" format (RUclips, Twitch, etc). Accepting that there's many points of degredation, and removing as many as possible is always good - that's an argument for the Sennheiser - the AT is ridiculously useable.
@@adamellistutorials Opinions vary, obviously. And a shotgun can, depending on environment, be the wrong tool for the job. The RODE NTG(3/4)s are solid, but for the money my next step up would be a Sennheiser MKE600.
416 has flatter and crisper highs. the 857 sounds more powerful. an EQ would fix anything, the 416 gets processed too. As i think the 875 sounds great too. better for podcasting sound. -3db on 500 and increase 3db at 8 hz
IMHO, If you can afford it, mkh 416 is a very good choice for one major reason . It is not sensitive to any sort of moisture, or bad weather including if you plan to use it only inside. I leave in a well tempered place , and even there I always ended with issue at some point or another, sometimes it take months, or year but I always ending with quality loss because of capsule deterioration because of humidity. With rf bias mic like mkh line, you can’t go wrong .
Those are some great points! I didn’t think to add that. I get caught up with all the other stuff and forget interference, humidity, weather. All that stuff definitely plays a roll. Thanks for checking out the video!
I can definitely hear the difference... I am in love with the MKH 416... I still do not have it! Just hear tones of demos and reviews... But I could definitely say that the AT875R is pretty pretty close and can do the job most of the time! Did not wanted to hear my inner voice telling me that MKH 416 feels better but well! Excelent video! Keep doing this dude!
This comparison kinda shocked me. I wasn't expecting the quality of the Audio technica. The 416 is definitely a forever mic but the AT might be the best starter shotgun mic. Thanks for checking out the video!
Great demos. Honestly the Sennheiser is more sibilant and sounds less full than the AT875R, and I felt the same when I recently compared the AT mic to a Rode NTG-1 (the Rode also had a hiss). The AT875R sounds great to me, and is one of the best bargain mics out there. I do use the windscreen on the AT875R, which I think is better.
The AT definitely is a great deal, but I do feel the sennheiser is a better option. I just love how natural it sounds. But with the price considered, it’s a no brainer to go with the AT. Thanks for checking out the video!
Thanks for the video! The Sennheiser is pretty much perfect. It has a rich, full-bodied sound without being boomy and a nice sparkle in the high end, which makes it sound better than the AT. It's really well-rounded. But like you said, is it really worth the difference of 850 USD if you're starting out? I'm glad I just bought the AT because it sounds so close and with a little bit of EQing probably even closer. The AT punches way above it's price point, I like
This video surprised me, I still think the 416 is a forever mic, but for anyone looking to get into audio recording the AT is a solid first shotgun mic. Thanks for checking out the video!
When you get to some pretty hardcore filming conditions, you will forget about “what you could EQ in post to get 416 sound” when you have no sound at all hahahaha. 416 is forever boom mic. I carry one all the time even if I use Schoeps CMIT for outdoors.
I don't think either sounds any better than the other. They both have different characters and that's what I heard. Without any A/B test, I wouldn't have known which is which.
I’d rather just buy the 416 and be done with it. It’s much more versatile and will last a lifetime. I’ve spend over $5k in the past few years on “cheaper” mics only to keep buying more and more. I’ve owned the AT897 for many years and never liked it. I’d be cautious buying another AT at this point.
That’s the biggest dilemma with content creation. Do I spend the big money early or do I save some and run the risk of something going wrong. We all have been there it’s just a learning experience. Thanks for checking out the video!
I have the 416 and got exactly what I paid for. I don't think it's an accident that I got booked for 2 jobs days after getting it. Spent months with a Rode NT1 and didn't land anything. Granted I have a less than ideal recording space. The NT1 is great if your room is acoustically treated well.
Mics are priced like sunglasses. It's about history and brand, and what they have been ABLE to get. That's why $200 mics can sound way better than $750 mics. It's like a Ray-Ban or Oakley. They are made from the same mold and materials as cheap products but they have a history and are strong "must have brands". Oakley can claim their run of the mill plastic is some high-end "space age" shit but it's not. I've broken enough of them. I own a $1800 tube condenser but it's very hard to handle and VERY picky on room environment. Most often I'm better off with a $200 dynamic for VO recordings. And if you can find something even cheaper to do the job I wouldn't be surprised.
That is a good point and to be honest there were instances where i struggled to tell the difference. That being said, i would totally go with the 416 because it was very useful on jobs and didn't give me any problems. Thanks for checking out the videos!
Mmm some may, the thing isn't that you always hear the difference I think, it depends on the sound being recorded and how/where it's produced compared to the mic. What makes the MKH416 what it is, is that it sounds detailed and good in almost all circumstances. I'd bet that there are almost no mics that would sound good where the 416 fails...
Great comparison video. I also picked the AT875R. It seemed to handle the outside noise better. Noise was louder with the MKH416. IMO.
That is sure an amazing result. As you said there is (of course) a difference in the 416, but I'd say it sounds like the 875R punches above it's weight. Great in-depth comparison.
Thanks for checking out the video!
Honestly in the main booth setup I like the sound of the AT875 more. It’s a short so at a distance the 416 is much butter. Both mics sound great.
That’s a good point. Thanks for checking out the video!
Dude. It's crazy you do this video. I just today got my first XLR shotgun and went with the 875R lol
It’s a solid mic for sure. Let me know how you like it! Thanks for checking out the video!
@@RebelTech1990 did one very brief test with it! i like!
The 875 isn't perfect, but it's a LOT better than its price. Less detail in the highs, but ridiculously good. On the edge of being useful in a professional space, but absolutely solid in any content heading to a "compressed" format (RUclips, Twitch, etc). Accepting that there's many points of degredation, and removing as many as possible is always good - that's an argument for the Sennheiser - the AT is ridiculously useable.
@@d112cons what’s a step up from the 875 that’s worth the money.
@@adamellistutorials Opinions vary, obviously. And a shotgun can, depending on environment, be the wrong tool for the job. The RODE NTG(3/4)s are solid, but for the money my next step up would be a Sennheiser MKE600.
It was a very good review.👍 thank you.😀
Thanks for checking out the video!
MKH has a minimum edge on clarity, but can be matched by the 875 with a minimum EQ, love the 875 I own 2 of them, love the size and build.
It is a great budget option. Thanks for checking out the video!
416 has flatter and crisper highs. the 857 sounds more powerful. an EQ would fix anything, the 416 gets processed too. As i think the 875 sounds great too. better for podcasting sound. -3db on 500 and increase 3db at 8 hz
Totally agree! Thanks for checking out the video!
IMHO, If you can afford it, mkh 416 is a very good choice for one major reason . It is not sensitive to any sort of moisture, or bad weather including if you plan to use it only inside. I leave in a well tempered place , and even there I always ended with issue at some point or another, sometimes it take months, or year but I always ending with quality loss because of capsule deterioration because of humidity. With rf bias mic like mkh line, you can’t go wrong .
Those are some great points! I didn’t think to add that. I get caught up with all the other stuff and forget interference, humidity, weather. All that stuff definitely plays a roll.
Thanks for checking out the video!
@@RebelTech1990can it be fixed bro?
I can definitely hear the difference... I am in love with the MKH 416... I still do not have it! Just hear tones of demos and reviews... But I could definitely say that the AT875R is pretty pretty close and can do the job most of the time! Did not wanted to hear my inner voice telling me that MKH 416 feels better but well! Excelent video! Keep doing this dude!
This comparison kinda shocked me. I wasn't expecting the quality of the Audio technica. The 416 is definitely a forever mic but the AT might be the best starter shotgun mic. Thanks for checking out the video!
Great demos. Honestly the Sennheiser is more sibilant and sounds less full than the AT875R, and I felt the same when I recently compared the AT mic to a Rode NTG-1 (the Rode also had a hiss). The AT875R sounds great to me, and is one of the best bargain mics out there. I do use the windscreen on the AT875R, which I think is better.
The AT definitely is a great deal, but I do feel the sennheiser is a better option. I just love how natural it sounds. But with the price considered, it’s a no brainer to go with the AT.
Thanks for checking out the video!
Thank you very much for this quality video and not just another basic and poor review. All these tests helped me a lot in choosing!
Thanks for checking out the video! I'm glad it was helpful!
Thanks for a great comparison
You’re welcome, thanks for checking out the video!
Hey buddy. I wish you luck and God give you ease for everything you do ❤
Thanks bud! You as well!
Great review. Liked, subscribed, hit the notification bell. Nicely done!
Thanks for checking out the video! Also thanks for the sub/like! Glad to have another Rebel in the community!
Thanks for the video! The Sennheiser is pretty much perfect. It has a rich, full-bodied sound without being boomy and a nice sparkle in the high end, which makes it sound better than the AT. It's really well-rounded. But like you said, is it really worth the difference of 850 USD if you're starting out? I'm glad I just bought the AT because it sounds so close and with a little bit of EQing probably even closer. The AT punches way above it's price point, I like
This video surprised me, I still think the 416 is a forever mic, but for anyone looking to get into audio recording the AT is a solid first shotgun mic.
Thanks for checking out the video!
Plosives on the shotgun mics are quite bad when you need to speak with some force, level and power. I think they need to be angled.
When you get to some pretty hardcore filming conditions, you will forget about “what you could EQ in post to get 416 sound” when you have no sound at all hahahaha. 416 is forever boom mic. I carry one all the time even if I use Schoeps CMIT for outdoors.
I’ve always wanted a Schoeps mic! I don’t think I’ll ever get one but they would be fun to try out once
Thanks for the hard work. I can come to an answer to myself after watching your video.
That’s great! Thanks for checking out the video!
I don't think either sounds any better than the other. They both have different characters and that's what I heard. Without any A/B test, I wouldn't have known which is which.
I’d rather just buy the 416 and be done with it. It’s much more versatile and will last a lifetime. I’ve spend over $5k in the past few years on “cheaper” mics only to keep buying more and more. I’ve owned the AT897 for many years and never liked it. I’d be cautious buying another AT at this point.
That’s the biggest dilemma with content creation. Do I spend the big money early or do I save some and run the risk of something going wrong. We all have been there it’s just a learning experience.
Thanks for checking out the video!
I have the 416 and got exactly what I paid for. I don't think it's an accident that I got booked for 2 jobs days after getting it. Spent months with a Rode NT1 and didn't land anything. Granted I have a less than ideal recording space. The NT1 is great if your room is acoustically treated well.
Are there any sound/voice distortions from 40-50cm away and 30 degrees axis on Sennheiser MKH 416?
Off my memory I don't remember. But I have a couple of videos covering the 416, those may give you the answer you're looking for.
Will you recommend this mic for a semi-treated room for VO?
Both of them are solid options for voice over. Any treatment will be good.
Thanks for checking out the video!
Mics are priced like sunglasses. It's about history and brand, and what they have been ABLE to get. That's why $200 mics can sound way better than $750 mics. It's like a Ray-Ban or Oakley. They are made from the same mold and materials as cheap products but they have a history and are strong "must have brands". Oakley can claim their run of the mill plastic is some high-end "space age" shit but it's not. I've broken enough of them. I own a $1800 tube condenser but it's very hard to handle and VERY picky on room environment. Most often I'm better off with a $200 dynamic for VO recordings. And if you can find something even cheaper to do the job I wouldn't be surprised.
I think the Audio Technica AT897 would have been a better match for the MKH416.
Wow, so close…
It definitely was. Thanks for checking out the video!
It think most are bias to the mkh416. I bet if you didn't show the switch no one would have ever known
That is a good point and to be honest there were instances where i struggled to tell the difference. That being said, i would totally go with the 416 because it was very useful on jobs and didn't give me any problems. Thanks for checking out the videos!
Mmm some may, the thing isn't that you always hear the difference I think, it depends on the sound being recorded and how/where it's produced compared to the mic. What makes the MKH416 what it is, is that it sounds detailed and good in almost all circumstances. I'd bet that there are almost no mics that would sound good where the 416 fails...