Seventh Day Adventist Reform Movement Los Angeles

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 2 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 23

  • @garysouthwell5762
    @garysouthwell5762 2 года назад +3

    This is the standard of music needed today! No Syncopation, No Euphoric Sentimentalism But pure, sacred, dignified, inspiring uplifting music! AMEN

  • @habinshutijeanepierre-zb5eu
    @habinshutijeanepierre-zb5eu 10 месяцев назад +1

    Praise the Lord our father Ilove you so much God bless you

  • @marthinkalalo3185
    @marthinkalalo3185 3 года назад +2

    God Bless always SDARM everywhere with this youth choir

  • @Antonio-ow9yh
    @Antonio-ow9yh Год назад +1

    Amén praíse God 🙏

  • @LeonardoTitoR
    @LeonardoTitoR 9 лет назад +7

    Wonderfull! God bless the church in Los Angeles!

  • @pablobeltran9479
    @pablobeltran9479 6 лет назад +2

    Está muy precioso el himno. Buen día para todos.

  • @bishmaya3232
    @bishmaya3232 9 лет назад +3

    Praise the Lord, sounds great, well done! May the Lord bless you all!

  • @rayanesantos5391
    @rayanesantos5391 2 года назад +1

    Linda música! Deus abençoe esse grupo

  • @rosallanos1619
    @rosallanos1619 8 лет назад +2

    me encanta la cancion de Jehova Amen

  • @DVGomes
    @DVGomes Год назад +2

    I am Biblingual SDA. Doesn't the SDARM have a Spanish service today 08 26 2023 for my wife to watch? please help somebody! I don't see anything on your RUclips Channel.Estoy en Miami FL y voy muchos veces a las servicios de Iglesia Reforma aqui. Yo estoy en Casa hoy, buscando servicio en Espanol del SDA Reform Movement. Este video es bueno, pero es 8 anos pasado. NO HAY en SDA RM ningun servicio en Espanol hoy August 26, 2023?? Yo abla Ingles, es mi primera lengua. No veo un servicio hoy tampoco en INGLES? Porque? Mi esposa es Latina que abla puro Espanol.

  • @manuelmendoza5307
    @manuelmendoza5307 2 года назад +1

    Hello, Aurora Cardenas!

  • @evanspompey3536
    @evanspompey3536 4 года назад +1

    I must say a taste of heaven!!

  • @PeacefulMoments1844
    @PeacefulMoments1844 9 лет назад +2

    Very nice. JAH bless!

  • @alicemael7319
    @alicemael7319 Год назад

    Ameen

  • @jelizvs
    @jelizvs 9 лет назад +2

    amen !

  • @jacblue1705
    @jacblue1705 5 месяцев назад

    Hello brothers! All good? So, my name is João Arthur, I'm Brazilian and I dubbed a video (divided into 8 parts) from Portuguese to English by pastor Alfredo Carlos Sas explaining and relating in detail the history of the Seventh-day Adventist Church Reform Movement, members of the Seventh-day Adventist Church who were expelled for disagreeing and refusing to transgress God's law by fighting on the battlefields and murdering people in the Second World War.
    Here is the link to the playlist with the videos:
    ruclips.net/p/PLVVDW7sCHKDafsM2yNCdjFLtgN0fONiFE&si=zBQL8jxDQniRNFxL

  • @alexandrasaintlot9429
    @alexandrasaintlot9429 8 лет назад +2

    The man said it himself when you love you don't take someone wife, Don't steal and more and still saying the law was nail to the cross. Why still keeping what the law says when you know the law of God is no more deepest confusion ever. Reading his long comment he seemed to know something about the Bible than twisting the words, mm you got to pray for guidance. 1 Jesus said ,"I do not come to take away the law but to fulfill it." Just find the difference between the ceremonial laws and Divine law. 2, Divine law let you know when you sin so you can quickly repent by going to the cross for grace, it's a light, a mirror and it will stay with us to show us how to live and love, love God and each other those who will be save are those who keep the law of God(divine law) and the testimony of Jesus Christ. 2, ceremonial laws now tell me it nail to the cross I'll believe because we don't need to sacrifice animals for sin anymore, Jesus's blood is enough, ceremonial laws and Devine law are two different types

  • @brianhyde5900
    @brianhyde5900 8 лет назад

    What teachers of the law do not understand is that sin has always been the same but the point they are missing is that definitions of sin change with historical context and with the method used by God to deal with sin. They seem utterly oblivious to these changes revealed by the Bible narrative. They have not discerned that man has changed
    because his capacity to understand and reason has evolved exponentially over time in direct relation to his spiritual
    development.
    For instance, you don't deal with sin the same way with a child as with an adult It would be absurd to treat a child the same way as an adult. Likewise, it would be absurd to treat an adult the same way as a child. Yet this is exactly what Adventists are advocating. No you change the method according to capacity. A child has to be told what to do because it does not have the capacity to reason from cause to effect. An adult, however, does have the capacity and can reason from cause
    to effect and does not have to be told what to do.
    The Israelites when they came out of Egypt were at an elementary level of development and God had to relate to them at their level of development. Under the old covenant God ordained that the Law against sin, minister to the law of sin working in the flesh and punish its outworking -- like children who had to be told what to do and like children they had to be punished if they did it. That's one reason why Paul called the Law a schoolmaster. By contrast, under the new covenant, God ordained that His Spirit minister to the law working in our spirit, as those who have "come of age" (and can reason and can apply faith). The Spirit of God relates to the law of the spirit in our mind and empowers us to
    rule over the flesh.
    The law "bore fruit for death" whereas the spirit always "bears fruit for God" (Rom 74,5) Whilst it is true that the nature of
    sin has not changed but the method of dealing with sin has changed.
    Under law we learn that God is concerned with unrighteous and criminal outward behaviour. Hence, we find sin is defined by law against unlawful (unrighteous and criminal) behaviour. By contrast, under grace (or the spirit) we learn that God is concerned with the inner intents and purposes of the heart -- the spirit of the mind. We learn that this is the source of sin and that unless the source is changed the fruit will remain the same, law or no law. The ministry of the Spirit is not about dealing with wrong behaviour; it is about dealing with wrong thinking. And it is life-changing. That's why we are commanded not to serve God by the old way of the written code of ten commandments but by the new way of the spirit empowered by Christ's Spirit of Grace. It is the difference between spiritual death in Adam and spiritual life in Christ (Rom 7:6). It is the difference between failure and success in overcoming
    sin.
    The Spirit operates by the unwritten (obviously, spiritual) law of love. When you are Love you cannot sin and you cannot go around taking God's name in vain, dishonouring parents, murdering your neighbour, stealing his wife and possessions and telling lies about him, etc. etc Why? Because Love fulfils the requirement of the old law (which was in essence "Don't do wrong") not just by not doing wrong but by DOING RIGHT (Gal 5:14). Law is about not doing wrong. Love is about much more than not doing wrong, it is about doing the very opposite -- doing right.
    Think about a serial killer. If we whip this guy, put him in jail, cut off his hands, or punish him in any number of harsh ways, can he stop killing? No. The law is incapable of changing someone's heart. Putting such a person behind bars for life may be the right thing to do for a just punishment and even corporal punishment (and not least to protect society), but it can't change this man's heart. Even if the only thing I've ever done that was wrong was lie, I still cannot stop lying or be clear in my conscience if you beat me a thousand times or tell me to stop lying because lying is against the law.
    Men who are given to lust will not stop lusting no matter how many times you tell them it's wrong or tell them that they are hurting another person. The law is incapable of doing that and has actually has the opposite effect. See Romans 6, 7, and 8.
    What Jesus came to do was to give us grace through His Holy Spirit through faith. By repenting of our sins, we are cleared in our conscience by the blood of Jesus and set free from both sin and the law by His Holy Spirit to serve God in the freedom of the spirit. We can walk out the righteousness of the law without having a rigorous set of rules that was, in any case, unable to save us or set us free. That is the message of the Gospel.
    The OT law was harsh and NT states this. These ordinances were nailed to the cross. We are set free from that into the law of liberty so that we are no longer flesh-driven but spirit-led.

  • @brianhyde5900
    @brianhyde5900 3 года назад

    @Eric Ruiz M.D.
    The Sabbath was a memorial of Israel’s deliverance from bondage and slavery in Egypt. What you as an Israelite (and later you as a Jew) DID on that day, is what kept it holy - and “holy” means “set apart”. The Sabbath command came with clear instructions what the patriarch and his family and his servants and his husbandmen WERE NOT TO DO. This did not make one holy in yourself because there is no such thing as intrinsic holiness (set apart). It KEPT the day holy-"set apart”, and by extension, kept the Israelites holy (set apart from other nations) insofar as “the God of Israel” was concerned. It was a SIGN to that effect.
    You confuse Jesus’ point about the Sabbath not preventing one from doing good (and therefore doing good is not restricted by a day) with the purpose of the Sabbath day UNDER LAW which was commemoration. Again, what one DID marked it as such.
    Law was not about doing good. It is about not doing bad, OR it was pure ceremony. The Sabbath was about keeping it a ceremony (just as the Passover, washings, were) by not working (certainy types of work at that) which is not about good or bad, or about NOT doing the bad things which the law specifically listed and duly punished. Incidentally, SDAs purport to observe law, but do not observe the law’s penalties. Law without penalty is useless. Its penal code is its force as a deterrent. You cannot have one without the other. Its either both, or no law at all. The is no law or punishment in the Spirit, so in Jesus (Spirit) there was no law at all (Spirit of Love is a state of being, not a list of rules. For this reason alone (not observing the penal code), the SDAs claim of “law-keeping” is bunk.

    So in my view your interpretation is not valid. It’s a typical SDA mishmash of the law which the SDAs (and SDARM) claim should not be changed in one iota, (oh and ESPECIALLY the Decalogue and even MORE ESPECIALLY the fourth command of the Decalogue!!), out of one side of their mouths, and yet claim should be changed out of the other side of their mouths JUST as you have done. Sorry, but the way SDAs observe the Sabbath is a joke!
    The NT believers were commanded NOT to serve God in the old way of the written law which bore fruit unto spiritual death, but in the new way of the Spirit which bore fruit unto God (Romans 7:4-6). But you are disobeying that command!
    Why?
    The saints were told that the law (principle) of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus, had set them free from the law of sin and death.
    But you are ignoring that instruction?
    Why?
    No, you want your cake (grace) and eat it too (law).
    No matter how you want to spin your interpretation of law, it is will always be a corruption, a syncretic mess of law and grace.
    You complain that I am making you people out to be criminals. I am not attacking you because you believe what you do but because the beliefs you hold are invalid and you impose them upon others. When your organisation lies about God and God’s expectations of people, and these lies keep people in a trap God never put there, THAT is what I consider “criminal”. And this is PRECISELY what you, what the SDA church, and what the SDARM, are all doing.

  • @vianna.judeu.ashkenazi
    @vianna.judeu.ashkenazi 2 года назад +1

    São todos vegetarianos

  • @brianhyde5900
    @brianhyde5900 5 лет назад

    POLITICAL PARTIES AND CHRISTIAN CHURCHES: WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE? When you consider closely, you will find churches and political parties with very little to distinguish between them. You will find them as having exactly the same kind of top-down hierarchal organisational structures headed by a messianic figure; of having exactly the same kind of secular attitudes toward other organisations; the same kind of intolerance toward dissidents within their own ranks; the same cut... and thrust infighting and power seeking: the same kind of corrupt links and connections with private investments in such things as land and property financed through the laundering of tithe and offerings; and as having exactly the same kind of "recruitment" techniques and "product" promotion, including NLP, etc. etc.. etc. And all this is claimed by the leader(s) as fully sanctioned by God and carried out under God's "end-time" direction and special blessing. Isn't it simply astonishing how easily church people can be manipulated and controlled and filched of their money once you know how to take full advantage of their lack of education, their religious supersition, and their natural prediction to believe as gospel whatever a self-proclaimed leader(s) says the moment he takes God's name upon his lips and insists in having been ordained and specially chosen by God, and his office as having the same tradition as the prophets or apostles of ancient Israel. Millions are duped in this way. But even more astonishing is that for the most part, the masses WANT this system to persist because they prefer to put their trust in others, rather than in their own Spirit.
    The SDARMs (yes there are more than one) are no different. Don't be fooled but appearances. They are extreme law-based cults who will mess up your mind for the rest of your life!!!