Professor Kishore gave very subtle answers to challenging questions from the interviewer who seemed to be more pro west. Kishore's wisdom and experience as a seasoned diplomat shine from the interviews he gave and books he wrote.
I actually was on the side of Professor Mahbubani with regard to his 2017 article. As a small country, we should be prudent in how we use our limited diplomatic ammunition. We should use it discreetly and decisively not recklessly, We have to be smart in picking our battles. The fact remains is that we are a small country. I am not a fan of Bilahari.
kishore tries to remind the gov that LKY and the old guards are pragmatist and don't go harping on ideologies because that won't help Singapore navigate between the great powers in the world... bilahari was very cocky because he was in that ambassador position... he's trying hard to defend the stance of the gov even when we got into trouble by tilting too much to the western stance...
14 million? Why Mr. Viswa Sadavisan turned a blind eye to the 34 million Chinese casualties and millions more displaced by the Japanese from the initial invasion of the Northern provinces to the end of WW II in China, or for that matter as a comparison to the so-called Tibet problem, the disappearance of millions of native Indians in NA? Where is your honesty and justice？Have you lost your objectivity and neutrality Mr？‘’Hypocrisy and double standard‘’ is the name of your game！!
Agree that Viswa, should have that covered. Than again, once can't possibly cover all angles and how his researchers are covering the angles to provide him with enough talking points and discusison.
This is the key in managing human affairs: “it is an art, not a science” :: Both opposing approaches can be correct at the same time depending on the different circumstances. Kishore is much wiser man ❤ 25:07
Great respect to Prof Mahbubani, but cannot agree on his view this time that China's nine dashed lines are illegal because they undermine the UNCLOS (which came into effect much later). Not necessarily in favour of China's claims but think the logic seems problematic. For example, should the Western colonial powers give up all their occupied land and interests because the occupation undermines UN Charter?
That's 11 dash line. Drew by ROC with help from US at the time. US donated military vessels to ROC to take control of whole S.C.Sea. The host is an ignorant and discriminative idiot!
Hahaha…there is only one founding father in Singapore….i.e. LEE KUAN YU….no such thing as 3 founding fathers….by the way if kishore do not know the strategic history of 9 dash lines….go back and read China history…as time passes by you will realise the importance and significance of 9 dash line and the legitimacy of the line…..hahahaha
您的智慧讓傲慢的西方學者都為之折服。他們總是帶著傲慢與偏見的角度，以偏概全來詮釋今日中國在各方面所取得的成就。
衷心向一代智者馬凱碩教授，向天下所有的母親致敬🙏🏻
没有西方你今天有饭吃吗？
感謝所有製作節目的人，讓我們可以認識到如此有智慧的學者、外交家馬凱碩！
看完節目後，我覺得標題可以稍為改一下，以符合馬先生對西方的提醒：“醒醒吧！美國！你的對手是擁有四千年以上文化的中國”~~
Professor Kishore gave very subtle answers to challenging questions from the interviewer who seemed to be more pro west. Kishore's wisdom and experience as a seasoned diplomat shine from the interviews he gave and books he wrote.
香港人最中意馬凱碩教授🎉🎉🎉睇好多佢嘅演講
I actually was on the side of Professor Mahbubani with regard to his 2017 article. As a small country, we should be prudent in how we use our limited diplomatic ammunition. We should use it discreetly and decisively not recklessly, We have to be smart in picking our battles. The fact remains is that we are a small country.
I am not a fan of Bilahari.
kishore tries to remind the gov that LKY and the old guards are pragmatist and don't go harping on ideologies because that won't help Singapore navigate between the great powers in the world...
bilahari was very cocky because he was in that ambassador position... he's trying hard to defend the stance of the gov even when we got into trouble by tilting too much to the western stance...
14 million? Why Mr. Viswa Sadavisan turned a blind eye to the 34 million Chinese casualties and millions more displaced by the Japanese from the initial invasion of the Northern provinces to the end of WW II in China, or for that matter as a comparison to the so-called Tibet problem, the disappearance of millions of native Indians in NA? Where is your honesty and justice？Have you lost your objectivity and neutrality Mr？‘’Hypocrisy and double standard‘’ is the name of your game！!
煞笔
Agree that Viswa, should have that covered. Than again, once can't possibly cover all angles and how his researchers are covering the angles to provide him with enough talking points and discusison.
西方有一些固有的優勢 - 通用語言 (英語)、軟實力 (例如眾所周知的商業產品、電影、流行音樂和電影明星等) 以及主導的金融和銀行體系。大陸需要時間來克服這些挑戰才能最終獲勝。
别急，一切都在改变之中。襾方文化正在走下坡路上，而东方的文明史正在回归，重新出发，展现变革后更 璀璨 耀眼的光芒！。
目前美西方在全球的信用正急速流失，包括CNN和BBC 。子曰：人无信不立，业无信不兴，国无信则衰。他们正在衰败中，最终美西方将沦为平凡的大国。
no single culture ever dominates history forever, why should the AS culture？
这个很难，西方能在全球推进其软实力的背后关键是殖民地遍布全球，中国历来也不是一个外向型国家，即使唐朝也是万邦来朝而不是主动向外推。
@@jangoju5450 别急，能把树叶和泥土卖到全世界的民族能有办法的！
提問者有立場,有問題！！！這世界,就是這些人把世界弄得混淆不清！注：不客觀能代表民眾發問嗎？？？
This is the key in managing human affairs: “it is an art, not a science” :: Both opposing approaches can be correct at the same time depending on the different circumstances. Kishore is much wiser man ❤ 25:07
Great respect to Prof Mahbubani, but cannot agree on his view this time that China's nine dashed lines are illegal because they undermine the UNCLOS (which came into effect much later). Not necessarily in favour of China's claims but think the logic seems problematic. For example, should the Western colonial powers give up all their occupied land and interests because the occupation undermines UN Charter?
relevant point
@@john-ss8hkgood question!
太棒了！ 精彩、坦诚丶客观的访谈！向二位大师级人物致敬！。
提问者有明显的立场引导
記者問的問題是專業問題. 帶有思辨性的尖銳質疑. "你不認為你主觀的依據是什麼". 許多人是無法回好這種問題的. 但是馬凱碩的回答相當有效(valid).
@@chiajueiloh5688 如果不是这几十年看见昂撒媒体的卵样高度一致，真被你骗到了，无一例外，遇到支持中国的就各种阴阳怪气，遇到美国及其盟友各种暴行熟视无睹，印度就是个好例子😜
The nine dash lines were not drawn by China alone. They were there with the republic of China already.
That's 11 dash line. Drew by ROC with help from US at the time. US donated military vessels to ROC to take control of whole S.C.Sea.
The host is an ignorant and discriminative idiot!
Good job, Kishore!! Keep it up!! 👍👍👍👍It seems to me that the other fellow is cockier than anyone else. Haha 🤪
You can tell the reporter is so envy of Kishore success and influence...so damn obvious!
Sir, I love you.🎉🎉🎉🎉
❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉
這長相也像是個三哥記者
開塲背景音樂 真討厭 吵到半死
對
❤
馬認為中國南海九段線不合法是錯誤的。這是二戰戰後的産物，正如歐洲戰勝重劃國界一樣，是列強封戰後世界的劃分，國際社會必須遵守的，聯合國也承認了。
又再一次臣服於馬先生的眼界， 深度， 敏銳卻又有溫度體察。
但更推重崇 他的：
弘觀性的，知無不言 言無不盡的「苦口婆心」的自信。
👍👍👍❤
📯CONFLICT OF INTEREST💥
📯ALL LIVES MATTER🌾🐳🐝🦋👫👾
📯EUTHANASIA☮️
📯NO COUNTRY OR SYSTEM'S NOR PEOPLE NOR REGILIOUS IS PERFECT IN THIS WORLD🗺️
馬凱碩講過好幾次,南海9段線不符合國際法,但從沒講過他的依據是什麼? 有人看過他的書嗎?
先被說什麼依據，他的潛台詞是：九段線的實際應用基礎是軍事力量而非國際法。
國際規則從來都是憑實力說話。
站在菲律賓的角度，黃岩島就堵在人家菲律賓門口，
危害其國家安全。
如果不是今日中國海軍實力到位，別說是九段線，讓大清維持一段都是在做夢。
先有九段線 其他國家沿著九段線建立國家 .
@@ibelievemoneygrowsontrees5041 大概按时间来说，先画的九段线，之后陆续菲律宾越南马来西亚独立，再之后才有的国际海洋公约。另外马凯硕直接混用了 不合法 和 非法/违法。当然这个问题本身可能只有10%算是法律问题，90%都是政治问题。说不合法的那个法，美国也都没加入呢
他從來沒有說九段線不合法，他說的是九段線不合時宜；這才是他的原話
@@tonymoy5291 你要不要再看一遍? 他在不同場合講過很多次，說九段線毫無根據，也不符合國際法。 你是不是根本沒看?
新加坡立國政策之一為壯大亞洲人主義。新加坡從殖民統治下翻身獨立出來，勢不可能脫亞入歐美陣營。新加坡人經歷了弱小國家可以壯大並與東協國家和平共存，平起平坐，也不依賴美國而欣欣向榮。
音樂太吵
The point is writing is to be read ❤ 39:17
受訪者與主持人, 各方水平高下立見!
Saya uncle aku were greetings from the overseas peranakan Chinese merlion mighty 🙂🙏🐼 Peter 60 saya aku
可憐阿!200多年的發展,就勝過4000年了,那這4000年在幹嘛?
哀~他確實有智慧,他也說了,正確的事他不一定會說....因為這就是地緣政治的智慧
台湾赢了，行了把。
Hahaha…there is only one founding father in Singapore….i.e. LEE KUAN YU….no such thing as 3 founding fathers….by the way if kishore do not know the strategic history of 9 dash lines….go back and read China history…as time passes by you will realise the importance and significance of 9 dash line and the legitimacy of the line…..hahahaha
🎉🎉
這個主持人本身就是偏見，問題亂七八糟，爛透了
主持人廢話少說