The issue of privacy is becoming a key issue in India. Here a case is going on in the Supreme Court of India regarding the linking of identity cards with sim cards, bank accounts etc. These cards have a QR code with the biometrics of every citizen. Linking of this card to bank accounts and sim card would mean that private firms have access to our biometrics.
2:20 The issue with this argumentation is you're vastly overestimating your worth as a human being. You make the argument as if you and you specifically are being intently monitored, but in a mass surveillance system, are an almost worthless data point, only as useful as any other data point, of which there are literally hundreds of millions. The system doesn't give a shit about you specifically, an AI is only using you and everyone else as a means to compare against outliers. Outliers are flagged by the system for manual surveillance, and they are the only ones actually watched. It's dishonest to make arguments both for or against mass surveillance without dropping this invalid assumption of an individual's personal value.
Assuming that you won't be acted against because you have little value is incorrect. The ENTIRE danger of the systems being put in place is that as automation increases, it takes so little effort to deal with a low value target that it will begin happening on a mass scale. So no... it might not be about you specifically... but if you happen to shop at a place that the Gov decides that they don't like tomorrow, suddenly your bank account is automatically frozen because you might be a terrorist. Lets say you shop at a place that ends up being involves in some serious crime. Suddenly you and everyone else who shopped there are identified and questioned by the police. Pretty soon when all of our cars drive themselves, your car will even automatically drive you down to the police station whether you want it to or not. Lets say that you go and apply for a job, but you don't get the job because rich corrupt people who own the company can afford to illegally access the database that holds your entire life in it. Even though you have no criminal record, they see somethings that they just don't like... so they don't hire you. Normally those things would be private and no one would ever know... but not in a World where every move that you make is tracked and recorded. So sure, it's true that the value of the individual is very low... but when the effort required to deal with the individual is so small that it becomes easy... ALL individuals will be acted upon!
I think your argument against mass surveillance is valid and I too see its dangers. I was merely pointing out that many common arguments against mass surveillance involve unnecessarily anthropomorphizing the surveillance system, and such arguments lose much of their potency because of it.
I actually see both sides of the argument here, but it still seems that facial recognition is too much of a future liability to the free man to be considered for use.
Firstly I can't go along with your lackadaisical approach to Private Invasion. Yes some people are making good money Off Of Other People's Private Business That No One Gave Them Permission To Use. Right now It's No Big Deal BUT WHEN SOMEONE HACKS THAT SYSTEM AND YOUR FACE IS NOW INVOLVED IN A CRIME YOU DIDN'T COMMIT I'M SURE THIS UNAUTHORIZED PRYING INTO PEOPLE'S LIVES WON'T SEEM SO CARE FREE THEN.
"...and don't forget to subscribe," which I totally did. Great content. But it's worth pointing out that this is another data point that's used to inform the advertisements we see. I'd venture to guess that my RUclips account (liked videos, subscriptions, etc) probably has a similar value to advertisers.
I am for having laws which allow facial recognition to be used by police for criminal investigation purposes only after the fact to look at stored data. I do not want companies to have the technology to use for targeted advertising. And as for Walmart telling whether their customers are frustrated, they don't need facial recognition. IF they're at Walmart they're frustrated.
Wait a minute you mean if the CIA FBI and NSA have access they do have access we give it to him and at one slip through the cracks they will do what they want to do or their business will all sudden vanish
I had to watch this for school, I didn't even know about this whole food facial recognition thing. I don't see that as useful, I see it as pointless or worse.
An Italian mafia boss who has been on the run for decades has been arrested after he was spotted on Google Maps. Gioacchino Gammino, 61, was found in Galapagar, Spain, where he was living under the name Manuel. A Google Street View shot showing a man resembling Gammino standing in front of a grocery shop was key to tracking the fugitive, investigators say. Gammino escaped a Rome prison in 2002 and was sentenced to life in jail the following year for murder. And you never expected Google to use those images for anything except helping you. Google got the reward for this man's capture. Millions of Europeans privacy was violated for Google's profit.
since i live in a democratic country where it isn't illegal to rally or protest i am not as worried about the government having facial recognition software, though i can see how that could go very very wrong. I am VERY worried about businesses having this technology, however. businesses already use loads of psychological tricks to convince you to buy something whether or not you really would have wanted to without such advertisements. to be able to further personalize this means they have one extra tool for bypassing whatever defense you may have for being manipulated.
Well, here where I live (Argentina) this technology is taken from sci-fi. But I think this could be great for ID cards or paying with credit card, you only have to scan your face to paid and it will difficult to steal your money. But more technology we have to be closer, more the companies and power people know about us, and they could use it for their approach.
In countries that knows DATA Security, DATA Privacy and all forms of protection, Private and Public sectors are aware of the consequences as well as losses in those types of Recognition. E-Commerce Laws and all laws governing the use of science and technology has its limits. Ptd/Trademarks/Copyrights/LLCs/Registrations/I.P.O are designed/Engineered/Configured to protect people from harm/abusers of data collection/Virtual Technology. Tiers 1 and 2, Levels 1 and 2, MGMT, Fraud/Risk management services. For your approval. Respectively certain. Thank you. /././././././././G.M Industries.
I don't think people who have the ability to kick in my door at 3AM and kill me, my family, and my dog with impunity should have this kind of power... At some point we will HAVE to take the power away from the government BY FORCE, but we will ALL have to do it TOGETHER, and the longer we wait, the worse and more difficult it will be...
I think this is just the cost of technology. The only thing that worries me is the general populace using this information to hurt you. Doxxing is a scary thing, and I imagine if someone wanted to hurt you, it can’t be too hard to hack into a camera with facial recognition abilities to track down where you’ve been so they can plot whatever twisted thing they have in mind. I’d imagine this would be frightening for celebrity type folk, or people who have someone on their bad side. RUclips celebrities in particular come to mind that could be affected by something like this. I guess as long as this data is secure and isn’t easy to get into maliciously, it shouldn’t be that bad...
If you have a phone using face recognition, then they already have your face structure in their database .. You gonna have to be like Michael Jackson in walmart with a mask so your movements don't get tracked..
It's not the tech that's scary, it's how it's applied. Snapchat filters are really benign, police databases of faces are much less invasive and easier to collect than fingerprints, and tbh I kinda wanna try a restaurant that can read my face and determine what I want before I can, it sounds super convenient.
As someone who grew up in a small town... The level of privacy we expect in the modern world is abnormal. A freak data point caused by unprecedented urbanization. For thousands of years we've lived in the view of people who will bring up past actions again and again, for worse OR for better. Of course, now we're used to being able to go to the city and do whatever we want with no social consequences. It will take time for us to get used to it.
Yeah, but here's the thing. If things got too bad for you in one small town you could leave and go somewhere else. Your reputation would not follow you. You had a chance to start over. With the systems being put in place today there is no escape and there is no forgiveness. It remembers everything forever, no matter where you go or how long it has been. That is something that should frighten everyone... because EVERYONE makes mistakes.
Derrick White but for thousands of years humans haven't lived in societies with big governments and big corporations tracking your every move for their gain
I think facial recognition is great! The government SHOULD use it and does use it. And if the government can have it we should be allowed to have it too. On the other hand, as a security tool, a face recognition lock is quite insecure, I've sat down at a computer and had it log me into someone else's account because it thought I was that person from my face. R.I.P. iPhone X users.
i always felt like it was kinda unsecure to use facial recognition to unlock your phone... let's say your face is extremely swollen after an allergic reaction, how are you gonna unlock your phone lol?
I hope you are right and it was a joke. from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acupuncture "Acupuncture is a form of alternative medicine in which thin needles are inserted into the body. It is a key component of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). TCM theory and practice are not based upon scientific knowledge, and acupuncture is a pseudoscience." That's what's wrong with it.
Search PubMed for acupuncture, it has demonstrated therapeutic value on a variety of fronts. Also he used that example precisely as something kind of personal but a completely legal activity that he doesn't want the government/corporations to know about because people might *judge* him for it...
This isn’t an invasion of privacy...the only time someone has access to your face is when you’re in public which is inherently non private and the only other situation where you would get recognized would be if you use programs and by doing so you’re giving permission to do so by using it. Soooo no no it’s not an invasion...you’re the one allowing it so grow up and learn the consequences of your actions
Shoutout to grade 10 -spencer
It’s all connected to Facebook. Get rid of it
We're already far beyond the point which would be ethical. It should only be used on convicted criminals.
NaN usually its opposite what happens
The issue of privacy is becoming a key issue in India. Here a case is going on in the Supreme Court of India regarding the linking of identity cards with sim cards, bank accounts etc. These cards have a QR code with the biometrics of every citizen. Linking of this card to bank accounts and sim card would mean that private firms have access to our biometrics.
Wow! Five years later and Clearview AI enters the chat
4:06; wait what?! public shaming? lol.
pipi caxa
2:20 The issue with this argumentation is you're vastly overestimating your worth as a human being. You make the argument as if you and you specifically are being intently monitored, but in a mass surveillance system, are an almost worthless data point, only as useful as any other data point, of which there are literally hundreds of millions. The system doesn't give a shit about you specifically, an AI is only using you and everyone else as a means to compare against outliers. Outliers are flagged by the system for manual surveillance, and they are the only ones actually watched.
It's dishonest to make arguments both for or against mass surveillance without dropping this invalid assumption of an individual's personal value.
Assuming that you won't be acted against because you have little value is incorrect. The ENTIRE danger of the systems being put in place is that as automation increases, it takes so little effort to deal with a low value target that it will begin happening on a mass scale. So no... it might not be about you specifically... but if you happen to shop at a place that the Gov decides that they don't like tomorrow, suddenly your bank account is automatically frozen because you might be a terrorist.
Lets say you shop at a place that ends up being involves in some serious crime. Suddenly you and everyone else who shopped there are identified and questioned by the police. Pretty soon when all of our cars drive themselves, your car will even automatically drive you down to the police station whether you want it to or not.
Lets say that you go and apply for a job, but you don't get the job because rich corrupt people who own the company can afford to illegally access the database that holds your entire life in it. Even though you have no criminal record, they see somethings that they just don't like... so they don't hire you. Normally those things would be private and no one would ever know... but not in a World where every move that you make is tracked and recorded.
So sure, it's true that the value of the individual is very low... but when the effort required to deal with the individual is so small that it becomes easy... ALL individuals will be acted upon!
I think your argument against mass surveillance is valid and I too see its dangers. I was merely pointing out that many common arguments against mass surveillance involve unnecessarily anthropomorphizing the surveillance system, and such arguments lose much of their potency because of it.
I actually see both sides of the argument here, but it still seems that facial recognition is too much of a future liability to the free man to be considered for use.
This sucks
that's skibidi
I think the fact that Google is going to start using its data collection to create AI for military purposes answers all the questions one might have.
If Russia’s doing it, then that means we should do the opposite.😆
Firstly I can't go along with your lackadaisical approach to Private Invasion. Yes some people are making good money Off Of Other People's Private Business That No One Gave Them Permission To Use. Right now It's No Big Deal BUT WHEN SOMEONE HACKS THAT SYSTEM AND YOUR FACE IS NOW INVOLVED IN A CRIME YOU DIDN'T COMMIT I'M SURE THIS UNAUTHORIZED PRYING INTO PEOPLE'S LIVES WON'T SEEM SO CARE FREE THEN.
I think we all need to GET RID of these cameras…..
"...and don't forget to subscribe," which I totally did. Great content. But it's worth pointing out that this is another data point that's used to inform the advertisements we see. I'd venture to guess that my RUclips account (liked videos, subscriptions, etc) probably has a similar value to advertisers.
i literally read this comment as soon as he said it
History shows, whatever the intent is to establish it, someone will want to expand it’s use. And goes the slippery slope…
I am for having laws which allow facial recognition to be used by police for criminal investigation purposes only after the fact to look at stored data. I do not want companies to have the technology to use for targeted advertising. And as for Walmart telling whether their customers are frustrated, they don't need facial recognition. IF they're at Walmart they're frustrated.
Bryan Lee Williams fuck facial recognition, fuck all laws! People should have the right to rig bombs, jack vehicles, steal shit, arson and even kill
@@lordofthegremlins Your half right, but if murder were legal then the government would just kill the people who disapprove of stuff they do
😂😂😂😂 yes, there is something about Walmart that makes people crazy!
Walmart doesn’t need facial recognition technology. If you’re shopping at Walmart, then you’re already in a bad mood.
nah
Wait a minute you mean if the CIA FBI and NSA have access they do have access we give it to him and at one slip through the cracks they will do what they want to do or their business will all sudden vanish
Facial recognition technology have been out there for at least for 20 years.
Next Iphone will have DNA sample to unlock.
I had to watch this for school, I didn't even know about this whole food facial recognition thing. I don't see that as useful, I see it as pointless or worse.
3rd to comment, and this video is awsome! Keep up the great work! 😀😊☺😃😁
Loren Carson I agree! Like so everybody can agree!
I didn't ask that but okay! ☺
Thanks for the love! We are glad you enjoyed it, and hope you subscribe. New vids every other Wednesday -- and good topics coming up.
An Italian mafia boss who has been on the run for decades has been arrested after he was spotted on Google Maps.
Gioacchino Gammino, 61, was found in Galapagar, Spain, where he was living under the name Manuel.
A Google Street View shot showing a man resembling Gammino standing in front of a grocery shop was key to tracking the fugitive, investigators say.
Gammino escaped a Rome prison in 2002 and was sentenced to life in jail the following year for murder.
And you never expected Google to use those images for anything except helping you. Google got the reward for this man's capture. Millions of Europeans privacy was violated for Google's profit.
since i live in a democratic country where it isn't illegal to rally or protest i am not as worried about the government having facial recognition software, though i can see how that could go very very wrong. I am VERY worried about businesses having this technology, however. businesses already use loads of psychological tricks to convince you to buy something whether or not you really would have wanted to without such advertisements. to be able to further personalize this means they have one extra tool for bypassing whatever defense you may have for being manipulated.
Showrout 10- conquerors
4 words bill gates super computer 🤷♂️
You are very informative democratic, and neutral.... What I would say.... Facial recognition.. Airports... Shoplifting,
Well, here where I live (Argentina) this technology is taken from sci-fi. But I think this could be great for ID cards or paying with credit card, you only have to scan your face to paid and it will difficult to steal your money. But more technology we have to be closer, more the companies and power people know about us, and they could use it for their approach.
In countries that knows DATA Security, DATA Privacy and all forms of protection, Private and Public sectors are aware of the consequences as well as losses in those types of Recognition. E-Commerce Laws and all laws governing the use of science and technology has its limits. Ptd/Trademarks/Copyrights/LLCs/Registrations/I.P.O are designed/Engineered/Configured to protect people from harm/abusers of data collection/Virtual Technology. Tiers 1 and 2, Levels 1 and 2, MGMT, Fraud/Risk management services. For your approval. Respectively certain. Thank you. /././././././././G.M Industries.
Uncomfortable comments towards China and Russia.
I don't think people who have the ability to kick in my door at 3AM and kill me, my family, and my dog with impunity should have this kind of power... At some point we will HAVE to take the power away from the government BY FORCE, but we will ALL have to do it TOGETHER, and the longer we wait, the worse and more difficult it will be...
I also agree with what you are saying because how can we trust some one that can take your life as you sleep and not get in any trouble
How about NEVER!
PRIVACY FOR ALL!
If I visit china I would not want to jaywalk but I do in the US because some lights never change to the walking man
Companies will create anti facial products
this is brilliant we need cameras every 500 yrds , people are fed up with crime , well done
poo
Shout-out da 10 Wisdom
I think this is just the cost of technology. The only thing that worries me is the general populace using this information to hurt you. Doxxing is a scary thing, and I imagine if someone wanted to hurt you, it can’t be too hard to hack into a camera with facial recognition abilities to track down where you’ve been so they can plot whatever twisted thing they have in mind. I’d imagine this would be frightening for celebrity type folk, or people who have someone on their bad side. RUclips celebrities in particular come to mind that could be affected by something like this. I guess as long as this data is secure and isn’t easy to get into maliciously, it shouldn’t be that bad...
If you have a phone using face recognition, then they already have your face structure in their database .. You gonna have to be like Michael Jackson in walmart with a mask so your movements don't get tracked..
I feel like it's kind of too late at this point. Your data is already everywhere whether you like it or not.
if it can recognize my face if it’s covered why my phone don’t unlock when i got a mask on
How does it order your food is it reading your brain?
first
Never
Is anyone else here from stem class but you thought the vid was fun to watch
That is the best response! We love knowing you enjoy our content, even if you have to watch it for class. Thank you!
Also see: Phil Merrall - UK Politica
awesom 👍great job
It's not the tech that's scary, it's how it's applied. Snapchat filters are really benign, police databases of faces are much less invasive and easier to collect than fingerprints, and tbh I kinda wanna try a restaurant that can read my face and determine what I want before I can, it sounds super convenient.
As someone who grew up in a small town... The level of privacy we expect in the modern world is abnormal. A freak data point caused by unprecedented urbanization. For thousands of years we've lived in the view of people who will bring up past actions again and again, for worse OR for better.
Of course, now we're used to being able to go to the city and do whatever we want with no social consequences. It will take time for us to get used to it.
Yeah, but here's the thing. If things got too bad for you in one small town you could leave and go somewhere else. Your reputation would not follow you. You had a chance to start over. With the systems being put in place today there is no escape and there is no forgiveness. It remembers everything forever, no matter where you go or how long it has been. That is something that should frighten everyone... because EVERYONE makes mistakes.
Derrick White but for thousands of years humans haven't lived in societies with big governments and big corporations tracking your every move for their gain
I think facial recognition is great! The government SHOULD use it and does use it. And if the government can have it we should be allowed to have it too. On the other hand, as a security tool, a face recognition lock is quite insecure, I've sat down at a computer and had it log me into someone else's account because it thought I was that person from my face. R.I.P. iPhone X users.
i always felt like it was kinda unsecure to use facial recognition to unlock your phone... let's say your face is extremely swollen after an allergic reaction, how are you gonna unlock your phone lol?
@@CHRF-55457 That's why the passcode still exists.
maybe if there wasnt capitalism but as long as it is profitable, anything even personal data and human beings, will be a commodity
Acupuncture? Really?
I expected more of the host on a channel that tries to embrace skepticism.
I hope you are right and it was a joke.
from en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acupuncture
"Acupuncture is a form of alternative medicine in which thin needles are inserted into the body. It is a key component of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM). TCM theory and practice are not based upon scientific knowledge, and acupuncture is a pseudoscience."
That's what's wrong with it.
Search PubMed for acupuncture, it has demonstrated therapeutic value on a variety of fronts. Also he used that example precisely as something kind of personal but a completely legal activity that he doesn't want the government/corporations to know about because people might *judge* him for it...
This isn’t an invasion of privacy...the only time someone has access to your face is when you’re in public which is inherently non private and the only other situation where you would get recognized would be if you use programs and by doing so you’re giving permission to do so by using it. Soooo no no it’s not an invasion...you’re the one allowing it so grow up and learn the consequences of your actions
ok sheep
I'm just going to wear a burka and turn my phone off during transit.