Fujifilm XF 70-300mm F4-5.6 Full Review & Romania's Wildlife

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 6 июл 2024
  • I had the chance to test out Fujifilm's very promising new 70-300mm lens and here's my full review and short story about it. Sample images, use scenarios and comparisons included. Hope you enjoy!
    Also I cannot stress it enough, how big of an issue feeding bears is and the problems it causes to humans and the bear population alike. But if you just want to admire nature and wildlife get yourself a big piece of glass and keep your distance!
    My Fujifilm 16-80mm Review video: • Fujifilm XF 16-80mm f4...
    Where to buy:
    Fujifilm XF 70-300mm lens: amzn.to/38Zdy8T
    Buy Mihai a coffee: paypal.me/mihaistrom
    My gear:
    Fujifilm X-T4 & XF 16-80mm Lens kit: amzn.to/3tBz9xu
    Fujifilm X-T4 (Body only): amzn.to/2Vzplro
    Fujifilm XF 16-80mm F4 lens: amzn.to/3k1mfps
    Rode VideoMicro microphone: amzn.to/3hl4CiP
    Boya BY-M1 Lav Mic: amzn.to/3npAfLL
    Blue Yeti Microphone: amzn.to/3BcvYPX
    DJI Mavic Air 2 Drone: amzn.to/2VCQ3iY
    Social media:
    / mihaistrompl
    / stromography
    / mihai.strom
    / mihaistrompl
    Music in this video and many thanks to the talented:
    Birocratic - swing low
    / swing-low
    Scott Buckley - Solace
    Scott Buckley - Filaments
    / scottbuckley
    0:00 Intro
    0:55 Build Quality
    3:15 Image Quality & Bokeh
    5:37 Comparison with alternatives
    8:41 Practicality
    12:35 Autofocus, Stabilization & Video
    14:33 Wildlife
    18:00 Conclusions
    Affiliate disclaimer: The links to Amazon are affiliate links, where I'll earn a small commission if you make a purchase at no additional cost to you.
    #lens #camera​ #photography​ #video​ #review​ #fujifilm​ #mirrorless #bears #wildlife

Комментарии • 69

  • @MihaiStrömpl
    @MihaiStrömpl  2 года назад +4

    One small thing, the image at 12:03 is actually at 300mm, not 70. Otherwise what do you guys think of this powerful little lens?

    • @ev6377
      @ev6377 2 года назад +1

      Love the lens and the photos you took - amazing!

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  2 года назад

      @@ev6377 Thank you so much! And happy holidays! 🎉 🎅

  • @julioareck
    @julioareck 2 года назад +6

    My conclusions about your nice video:
    1. Get this lens.
    2. Travel to Romania.
    3. Bears are lovely to see.

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  2 года назад +1

      Haha thanks a lot! And definitely visit Romania. There's a lot to see, and ven as a Romanian, I feel like I've barely scratched the surface.

  • @georgetalbot7650
    @georgetalbot7650 2 года назад +15

    Thanks for a very well balanced assessment. I have this lens and the 50-140 and 100-400, I don't see myself using either much anymore. At 72 years old the weight is a issue and this resolves that. It works very well with the 1.4TC and comparing the images with the other two you really have to pixel peep hard to see the difference.
    The most important aspect of it is that the ease of handling and weight makes the experience much greater and more enjoyable.

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  2 года назад +1

      Thank you so much! Glad if this was helpful in any way. And thanks for your example as well, yeah that's definitely something to consider, when the size difference is double or almost triple for similar (enough) results, it's probably a good compromise to go for the smaller one, for most people.

    • @ev6377
      @ev6377 2 года назад

      Lovely cat 🖤😻
      Btw, great photos! Love them!

  • @jeanie779
    @jeanie779 2 года назад +5

    finally a great review for the 70-300!

  • @NWind-go9qn
    @NWind-go9qn 2 года назад +1

    Well done. I appreciate your humble authenticity. Keep up the good work!

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  2 года назад

      Thanks a lot! Highly appreciated 😊

  • @norbfacee
    @norbfacee 2 года назад +7

    Finally a decent review of the Fuji 70 - 300

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  2 года назад +1

      Thanks man! Also I love True Detective :)

    • @k.o.t.o.n.
      @k.o.t.o.n. 2 года назад +1

      @@MihaiStrömpl is it bettter than the 70-350 g for sony a6000 series?

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  2 года назад +1

      @@k.o.t.o.n. Interesting comparison! I haven't personally used the Sony, but at least on paper and from what I've heard the Fuji might have the edge on a few things: Slightly wider aperture, shorter minimum focus distance, 9 aperture blades instead of 7 on the Sony. On the other hand the Sony does have a bit of a longer reach.

  • @_noahrh
    @_noahrh Год назад

    That bear on the street was so relaxed! Thank you for the review of this lens. Great work.

  • @seyedk8908
    @seyedk8908 Год назад

    AmAZING REVIEW AND aMAZING SHOTS OF THE BEAR. i LOVED IT. THANK YOU

  • @blankonbank
    @blankonbank 2 года назад +2

    I did like your review. It's quality is just as good as some really big youtubers. 👍🏻
    Keep going and thanks for the review.

  • @olekl5721
    @olekl5721 8 месяцев назад +1

    Good review. THanks!

  • @mazdaram226
    @mazdaram226 2 года назад +1

    Great review, thank you from 🇬🇧

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  2 года назад +1

      Thank you! And I certainly want to visit the UK in the near future✈

  • @catalinene146
    @catalinene146 2 года назад

    Great review, Romania it's definitely on the list, can you please mention the bear observatory. Many thenks and lot's of good shots.

  • @fjzingo
    @fjzingo 2 года назад +4

    Thanks for a great review, and congratulations to your meeting with the bear. The 70-300 is my favourite fuji lens next to my 16 1.4 for wildlife and nature photography. The 70-300 is extremely light and works really good together with the 1.4 tc. It is also very comparable to the 100-400 which I also use extensively. Did a trip to Iceland a few weeks back and brought two cameras and a few lenses. I used a GFX100s with 23mm and an xt3 with 70-300 for almost all nature shots. They complemented each other really well. Didnt use the 1.4 tc at all. Used a 35 mmf2 and 18-55 for documenting Reykjavik and people. If highly recommend the 70-300.

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  2 года назад

      Massive thanks! And thank you for the insight as well. Mind sharing a link where I could see some photos you took in Iceland?

    • @santiagocasier6436
      @santiagocasier6436 Год назад

      Hey I know this is about a a year late but is there anywhere that I can see your photos?

    • @fjzingo
      @fjzingo Год назад

      @@MihaiStrömpl still processing those….I should share at some point.

  • @ankaracatalca
    @ankaracatalca 2 года назад +1

    Very nice and fair review. Thanks.
    I love this lens. It’s the only telephoto lens that I use now, I think I am going to sell my 50-140.

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  2 года назад +1

      Thanks a lot! And that's interesting to hear, also good for the wallet haha

  • @charlesgroley6309
    @charlesgroley6309 Год назад +1

    Great commentary on the lens (and the bears). Sorry about your missing the observatory opportunity but I thought your video was very informative.

  • @pdebie1982
    @pdebie1982 2 года назад +4

    Nice video. 1 suggestion: the music was really loud against your voice. Maybe turn the volume a bit down next video :)

  • @malfunkt
    @malfunkt 2 года назад +1

    Just bought mine this morning and used it on a corporate shoot. Can't wait to use it for street, landscape and abstract work. I've had the 16-80 for a while, which is a great lens, and some of that tech / feel is in this lens. Particularly the OIS. I can get sharp shots at 1/12 at 300mm which is great for low light landscape and city shots without a tripod. The total investment in the 16-80 and 70-300 gives you an entire system. Pair it with 1 or 2 larger aperture lenses (in my case two Kamlans 50 F1.1 II, 28 F1.4) and you have a versatile kit. One lens that might be a consideration is the coming Tamron 18-300. Likely, there will be larger sacrifices made to make that lens feasible, but it may make sense for certain shooters. The other telephoto lenses I looked at were the Mitakon 135mm F2.8 and the Samyang 135mm F2 - the latter which looks like it has incredible image quality. But they are manual, and at telephoto ranges and with my current kit, I don't want to burn out my hands cranking the focus ring even more.
    One last thing. Oddly, the 70-300mm balances incredible well on an X-E3 (with hand and thumb grips). Even better than the 16-80 despite being a bit heavier, and this is in large part due to its length.

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  2 года назад +1

      Awesome! I'm curious what you think of it once you get to test it out in the wild. But yes I definitely agree, there's a very familiar feel and behavior to it, coming from the 16-80, which is a praise I believe. And I was thinking the same thing, regarding getting a 35 or 50 fixed fast aperture lens. Plus the 16-80 + 70-300 really do cover everything you'd need. If not, the Tamron does sound like it would indeed, all in one body, but yes I do think there's way more compromises than with this one. And I really am open to other brands of lenses for the X mount, but I just don't know if I can go the full Manual Focus path, for the ones that don't have AF of course. I might try it with a small 35mm or something at some point though.

    • @malfunkt
      @malfunkt 2 года назад +1

      @@MihaiStrömpl My early impressions so far are very positive. The OIS is perhaps even more impressive than the 16-80, as it is so effective even at long focal lengths. At max 300, the edges are bit soft, but that is to be expected. The rest of the zoom range is very strong. While the manual focus lenses have their own advantages, for non-tripod use and fast focus acquisition (which at long focal lengths becomes more tricky with manual), the 70-300 excels. Adjusting the zoom ring is a bit stiff. Though this may be of benefit as it prevents accidental adjustment which even minute could throw off focus. Also the lens works great in back button focus configuration in manual. The latter being one of the reasons why I've stuck with the X-E3 instead of moving to the X-E4 as regularly switch between focus modes and the X-E3 has more configurable control for this type of setup.

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  2 года назад

      @@malfunkt Glad to hear you're enjoying it. Yes the OIS is impressive, I think it's the same system but definitely is more impressive at those focal lengths. And about the zoom ring, it does feel pretty stiff but it probably will become a bit looser in time, so I don't think they could've done it otherwise, without having Zoom creeping for sure.

  • @cristiabc1310
    @cristiabc1310 Год назад

    Ce regiuni ai recomanda?

  • @richaneesh
    @richaneesh Год назад

    I was thinking of going for 100 400 but when I went to buy the 50-140 the weight just pushed away from it and ended up buying the 18-120. I definitely cannot deal with the weight and size of 100-400 because I really don't like to carry a tripod with me, and this 70-300 is out of stock. I am just waiting for the stock now... Hopefully not too long..

  • @visualsbypreet
    @visualsbypreet 2 года назад +2

    Very Nice review, but a small suggestion that the Music goes too loud in comparison to your voice, I had to keep increasing and decreasing volume

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  2 года назад

      Thank you! Yes I believe you're right.

  • @rawlinsdiaz
    @rawlinsdiaz 8 месяцев назад +1

    Hey nice video. Does it do some refocus when you zoom out quickly in video mode even with the lens in manual focus. Im seeing this via hdmi out to a screen. Dont know if its the lens or the body under some display setting. Could help me if you have tried this.

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  7 месяцев назад +1

      Thanks a lot! And yes it does, sadly zooming in or out does affect focus on these Fuji lenses even on Manual, I've noticed.

    • @rawlinsdiaz
      @rawlinsdiaz 7 месяцев назад +1

      @@MihaiStrömpl thanks a lot. Keep it up. Cheers

  • @olekl5721
    @olekl5721 8 месяцев назад +1

    How you film your videos for youtube? Which lense do you usually use?

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  8 месяцев назад

      I've been using the Fuji X-T4 for the past 2 years with either the kit 16-80mm or Sigma 30mm f1.4, the latter which is a pretty awesome lens all around, but especially if you want to get some subject separation. I plan to do a review of the Sigma soon!

  • @christingeorge3556
    @christingeorge3556 2 года назад +1

    ❤️

  • @rescuerofwildlifejigneshpa3011
    @rescuerofwildlifejigneshpa3011 2 года назад +2

    🔥👌👌👌👌

  • @HaiTomVlog
    @HaiTomVlog Год назад +1

    I was tempted to get the 55-200mm instead of this 70-300 (it was half the price), but I went ahead and purchased this lens - arrives tomorrow 🤙🏼

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  Год назад +1

      Congrats! Great choice, I hope you enjoy it.

    • @HaiTomVlog
      @HaiTomVlog Год назад

      @@MihaiStrömpl thanks! You’re one closer to 1k subs 🤙🏼🤙🏼🤙🏼

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  Год назад +1

      @@HaiTomVlog Awesome! Cheers mate 🍻

  • @mzm4344
    @mzm4344 2 года назад +1

    Sorry, but what about Bence Mate?

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  2 года назад

      I was mentioning that he is the one who made this bear observatory. He is also known for making this specific type of one way glass used in animal watching observatories.

  • @DexterPiano
    @DexterPiano Год назад +1

    Do you think it's great to film concerts ? Live music ? Thank you and great video :))

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  Год назад +1

      Thanks! I think it'd be great for concerts actually, almost a pocketable size and plenty of reach.

    • @DexterPiano
      @DexterPiano Год назад

      @@MihaiStrömpl even with somekind of lowlight situation ? At the same time concerts doesn't occur with artificiel light but not specificaly low-light ?
      Thank you man 🙏

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  Год назад +1

      @@DexterPiano i think it's gonna do just fine. You probably want to keep some of the dark mood anyway, and not be able to pixel peep in every shadow

    • @DexterPiano
      @DexterPiano Год назад +1

      Thanks a lot Mihai !!!

    • @DexterPiano
      @DexterPiano Год назад +1

      @@MihaiStrömpl Hey Mihai, according to Photo Video Chris and Andy Mumford, the 70-300 is not super fast and not so suitable for low-light, what do you think about that ? Sorry for all these questions :)

  • @johnsamuelmcelroy
    @johnsamuelmcelroy 2 года назад +1

    I tired of waiting for the chance to purchase this lens. Since then I traded in an X-T3, the XF16-90, and XF18-55 to purchase a used Nikon D500, Nikkor 200-500, and a Tamron 70-200.

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  2 года назад +1

      The Nikkor 200-500 is a beast! But yes I see the 70-300 is currently not available on many markets. Might be a victim of its own success with the high demand.

  • @paulm8157
    @paulm8157 2 года назад +1

    Decent lens review and bear adventure story. Old joke: never walk in the woods with a “bear” behind.😁 Are you a cat person?

    • @MihaiStrömpl
      @MihaiStrömpl  2 года назад +1

      Haha sounds like some wise words! And I'd say I'm an animals person but I do have 2 cats, so can't deny it.

  • @atsylor5549
    @atsylor5549 2 года назад +1

    It’s kind of shameful that you actually have to warn some people not to try and take a selfie with a bear