You missed the main point mate. Getting this means you can actually spend time driving the car vs waiting for your car to be fixed constantly like in say the Ranger.
Pretty good review, but you could hilight that to get constant 4wd in a Ranger you need to outlay $73000. You could hilight were the Triton exceeds the Ranger: - warranty - reliabilty - extra safety across the range - cheaper - better load capacity - better fuel economy - manoeuvrability and smaller turning circle To me this all says that Triton now sets the benchmark.
The first point was highlighted "Need to get a V6 Ranger or Amarok for constant 4WD" As for the rest... Warranty - absolutely Reliability - possibly, though new engine and platform means it's untested Extra safety - not true, Ranger has comprehensive safety across the range so same Cheaper - yep, by a few thousand, that point was made Better load capacity - payload very similar, Triton slight edge with a bigger tray, though Ranger is bigger between the arches by a decent amount Fuel economy - this point was made in the written review and yes Triton does seem better by about 0.5L/100km in our testing Smaller turning circle - only 0.3m in it, but you're right Triton is slightly tighter
Thanks for replying, so you are basically agreeing that the Triton is ahead of the Ranger in quite a few key areas, so this must kinda mean its at the benchmark pointy end. It's seems the only area where the Ranger is superior is ride comfort at low speed and more pitch control on undulations. My theory on this is that the Ranger is better due to 200kg of extra fat. ps on safety everything except front camera is standard on the base GLX and the Ranger doesn't have driver fatigue monitoring...
@@keithholland7465 the ranger is also roomier and the adaptive cruise control is much better than the Triton. Both of them have poor stopping distance. and the turning circle isn't that big of a difference to matter driver fatigue monitoring is garbage tech
Now do a segment with some roadside assistance mechanics regarding the Ranger… I’ve also road tested the new triton and the Ford. It’s getting more and more obvious you are paid by Ford
The video made it clear that it isn't as good as the Ranger/Amarok, okay. But I wonder how does it stack up against the rest. The numbers on paper seem good, and if its 2nd to the Ranger at a much lower cost, then the Triton is a solid ute to get I recon, even if you aren't a Triton fan.
I had a 2019 Triton for 240,000 klms and I currently have a 2022 Ranger which I have done 130,000 klms. While I like the slightly larger cabin space on the ranger, the 6 speed transmission is terrible compared with the Triton. Your review regarding the Triton on how it handles bumps and potholes on the road is just as bad in a ranger. The infotainment system in the ranger is way more glitchy than the Mitsubishi. I will be interested seeing some long term reviews conducted from people who drive these vehicles daily. Mitsubishi has always been underrated in my opinion.
I took a Triton, Dmax, and BT 50 for a test drive. On the same road, did not go off road. Before the test I had my Mindset on the BT 50. I even took 2 different models of the BT 50 on the same driving loop. The Dmax was a NO to me. The BT 50, Was a lot smooth in the gearbox changing gears. But over the same bumps wanted a Bunny hop. And after driving them, My leg ate because of the foot position on the break and saturated petals. Before driving the triton , I was against it because of the Adblue. After the test drive, it ticked all the boxes. There was only 2 issues that concerned me. The engine rev a lot higher while driving and a gearbox changing gears Was snappy. I'm looking for a vehicle. That I can hop in and drive a 1000kms in the trip and still be able to walk the next day.
Times like this when Japanese domestic markets were never interested in Triton dual cab ute (typically made in Thailand) with monotonous drum brakes and polluting diesel engines; Mitsubishi Triton V6 petrol 2 door coupe utility pick-up were ever last made in Japan 2006 due to beyond repairs, thirsty V6, drum brakes fail by collisions and worst insurance premiums.
The down hill decent control can be set between 1 & 20 kmph, this can be adjusted via the accelerator or the brake depending on if you want to go faster or slower.
Toyota XLT??? What’s that? 😮 why is everything based off a lemon 🍋 yes the ranger drives nice and has a large screen 📺 but it’s the lowest for reliability just like the new NF Amarok. Fit and finish is a Ute not a prestige car! You new age car reviewers have lost touch. That’s why I like the channel Redriven
Triton bigger than a hilux? Your dreaming. The hilux rogue sits higher with more articulation flex and much wider body and guards and is heavier. Gutless old 2.4L is a joke.
@@ev0watthe Triton is the second largest pick-up in ASIA-OCEANIA Market..lots of car reviewers confirmed it already..Hilux Rouge just looks wider because of the additional aesthetic exterior options
You guys deleting comments now, what happened to free speech you go on about. Just another biased review. Why compare it to the Ranger and not any other utes? Lol, so so obvious.
Well, at least this review didnt include your sponsors name dropped every 30 seconds. You were doing really well, right up untill the last 30 seconds when you had to drop the Ranger name. So so obvious guys. Why not throw in a quick comparison with the other competition Hilux,dmax etc to hide it. By once again comparing to just the Ranger like Sams shambles review did, your bias has been highlighted. I tested the XLT VS GLS Triton, and the Triton wins hands down and was 8k cheaper.
@@richardtimms6645 The new Outlander is also a Nissan X Trail. Outlander uses the 2.5 and CVT from Nissan. That's not a bad thing but it is a fact. The infotainment system came from the last gen X Trail. Watch one review to see.
Another good review. Everybody these days seems to be giving the Ford Ranger a shout out, however, it has been my experience that the Ford Ranger is not that reliable over an extended period of time. The only similar vehicle that I have purchased multiple times with no regrets is the Toyota Hilux.
In Thailand they modified with the biggest turbo all the pickup truck for drag racing and track race mostly they use Isuzu but in standard engine Isuzu is not good enough power, Mitsubishi is the best interm of speed performance sterling design safety features gearbox and intelligent engineering, Ford ranger second choice, Nissan Isuzu third choice,I hope in future Mitsubishi built the new Mitsubishi pajero and Triton with the best technology suspension from Citroen and ladders body structure bullet proof like the GWM tank of china
You guys are all partial to Ford you never mention cheapness unreliability poor history poor engineering put into the ranger. Ford has had same problems gear box issues for 10 years yet you still recommend it.
You missed the main point mate. Getting this means you can actually spend time driving the car vs waiting for your car to be fixed constantly like in say the Ranger.
Pretty good review, but you could hilight that to get constant 4wd in a Ranger you need to outlay $73000. You could hilight were the Triton exceeds the Ranger:
- warranty
- reliabilty
- extra safety across the range
- cheaper
- better load capacity
- better fuel economy
- manoeuvrability and smaller turning circle
To me this all says that Triton now sets the benchmark.
If they did that they would lose their Ford Marketing budget.
The first point was highlighted "Need to get a V6 Ranger or Amarok for constant 4WD" As for the rest...
Warranty - absolutely
Reliability - possibly, though new engine and platform means it's untested
Extra safety - not true, Ranger has comprehensive safety across the range so same
Cheaper - yep, by a few thousand, that point was made
Better load capacity - payload very similar, Triton slight edge with a bigger tray, though Ranger is bigger between the arches by a decent amount
Fuel economy - this point was made in the written review and yes Triton does seem better by about 0.5L/100km in our testing
Smaller turning circle - only 0.3m in it, but you're right Triton is slightly tighter
Thanks for replying, so you are basically agreeing that the Triton is ahead of the Ranger in quite a few key areas, so this must kinda mean its at the benchmark pointy end. It's seems the only area where the Ranger is superior is ride comfort at low speed and more pitch control on undulations. My theory on this is that the Ranger is better due to 200kg of extra fat.
ps on safety everything except front camera is standard on the base GLX and the Ranger doesn't have driver fatigue monitoring...
@@keithholland7465 The all round camera is across the whole range including GLX.
@@keithholland7465 the ranger is also roomier and the adaptive cruise control is much better than the Triton. Both of them have poor stopping distance. and the turning circle isn't that big of a difference to matter
driver fatigue monitoring is garbage tech
So gotta get that ranger plug in for the Ford marketing team no matter what!
Now do a segment with some roadside assistance mechanics regarding the Ranger…
I’ve also road tested the new triton and the Ford. It’s getting more and more obvious you are paid by Ford
Not really a review. Got nothing out if other than you are a Ranger fanboi
I agree! This is someone who is here to tell us how bad the vehicle is!
What a dork he is 😂
The video made it clear that it isn't as good as the Ranger/Amarok, okay. But I wonder how does it stack up against the rest. The numbers on paper seem good, and if its 2nd to the Ranger at a much lower cost, then the Triton is a solid ute to get I recon, even if you aren't a Triton fan.
Will be very close to call. Stay tuned for comparison tests to come. But you're right, it's a solid choice.
especially with double the warranty period.
I had a 2019 Triton for 240,000 klms and I currently have a 2022 Ranger which I have done 130,000 klms.
While I like the slightly larger cabin space on the ranger, the 6 speed transmission is terrible compared with the Triton. Your review regarding the Triton on how it handles bumps and potholes on the road is just as bad in a ranger. The infotainment system in the ranger is way more glitchy than the Mitsubishi.
I will be interested seeing some long term reviews conducted from people who drive these vehicles daily.
Mitsubishi has always been underrated in my opinion.
Another review bought to you by Ford Ranger, with no comparison to any other brand other than Ford 🤔
How must does ford ranger pay you ?
I took a Triton, Dmax, and BT 50 for a test drive. On the same road, did not go off road. Before the test I had my Mindset on the BT 50. I even took 2 different models of the BT 50 on the same driving loop. The Dmax was a NO to me. The BT 50,
Was a lot smooth in the gearbox changing gears. But over the same bumps wanted a Bunny hop. And after driving them, My leg ate because of the foot position on the break and saturated petals. Before driving the triton , I was against it because of the Adblue. After the test drive, it ticked all the boxes. There was only 2 issues that concerned me. The engine rev a lot higher while driving and a gearbox changing gears Was snappy. I'm looking for a vehicle. That I can hop in and drive a 1000kms in the trip and still be able to walk the next day.
Times like this when Japanese domestic markets were never interested in Triton dual cab ute (typically made in Thailand) with monotonous drum brakes and polluting diesel engines; Mitsubishi Triton V6 petrol 2 door coupe utility pick-up were ever last made in Japan 2006 due to beyond repairs, thirsty V6, drum brakes fail by collisions and worst insurance premiums.
The MV Triton is being sold in Japan
The down hill decent control can be set between 1 & 20 kmph, this can be adjusted via the accelerator or the brake depending on if you want to go faster or slower.
Toyota XLT??? What’s that? 😮 why is everything based off a lemon 🍋 yes the ranger drives nice and has a large screen 📺 but it’s the lowest for reliability just like the new NF Amarok. Fit and finish is a Ute not a prestige car! You new age car reviewers have lost touch. That’s why I like the channel Redriven
reliability is actually decent. claims of poor reliability are over blown
Off road cruise control??
Shop around? Ranger aint bigger or better mate. Triton now bigger than a Hilux. Tub in Ranger look tiny.
Triton bigger than a hilux? Your dreaming. The hilux rogue sits higher with more articulation flex and much wider body and guards and is heavier.
Gutless old 2.4L is a joke.
@@ev0wat lol..Rouge aint a standard Lux mate. And check the stats, Triton is bigger.
@@davidscott820plus the interior of the rogue looks like a 2002 Camry lol
@@ev0watthe Triton is the second largest pick-up in ASIA-OCEANIA Market..lots of car reviewers confirmed it already..Hilux Rouge just looks wider because of the additional aesthetic exterior options
At 9:24 minutes, did he say “Toyota XLT Ranger”??
2.0-litre XLT Ranger
Trail control? Is there something wrong with your feet?
Ranger a few grand dearer…that’s a bit of a stretch, it’s around $8k against the 2.0 XLT or 15%
$63,390 for Ranger XLT 2.0, $59,090 for Triton GLS = $4300. Upper end of “a few” I’ll grant you, but a long way short of $8K
@@addictedtosliding its based on RRP like all other reviews, RRP of the ranger is not 63.390
@@Kevin_Barnacle_Jones I can assure you it is
You guys deleting comments now, what happened to free speech you go on about. Just another biased review. Why compare it to the Ranger and not any other utes? Lol, so so obvious.
Well, at least this review didnt include your sponsors name dropped every 30 seconds. You were doing really well, right up untill the last 30 seconds when you had to drop the Ranger name. So so obvious guys. Why not throw in a quick comparison with the other competition Hilux,dmax etc to hide it. By once again comparing to just the Ranger like Sams shambles review did, your bias has been highlighted. I tested the XLT VS GLS Triton, and the Triton wins hands down and was 8k cheaper.
Infotainment is Nissan, is bagged in their older vehicles.
Main dials and LCD between them is also Nissan, bagged for being archaic.
No it's not. It's in the outlander and is great
@@richardtimms6645 The new Outlander is also a Nissan X Trail. Outlander uses the 2.5 and CVT from Nissan. That's not a bad thing but it is a fact. The infotainment system came from the last gen X Trail. Watch one review to see.
@@phillipmarnik why the link to Nissan parts bin?
If its built half as good as a ' 380 ' buy it.😅
That thing was awesome.
The media of the day didn't rate the 380 either, i often wonder if the have driven the same car i have when i read and watch their reviews.
Intrusive driver tech is always a deal breaker for me.
No new cars for you ever again then
Any towing test reviews coming?
For sure, stay tuned!
This is a review? Phews, you miss a lot of features mate.
Such as?
Another good review. Everybody these days seems to be giving the Ford Ranger a shout out, however, it has been my experience that the Ford Ranger is not that reliable over an extended period of time. The only similar vehicle that I have purchased multiple times with no regrets is the Toyota Hilux.
It is fantastic and the diesel engine is really a must for a truck!, No real exact idea of why diesels are absolute in N.Am.😢
They've just never been popular with a large majority of buyers. There's probably some point or event in the past this can be traced back to.
My friend I wouldn’t let you review a new ice cream flavor.
They'll probably say this chocolate icecream doesn't taste as good as a Ford Ranger 😂
But I love ice cream😢
@@richardtimms6645 😂
Great. How about you review the changan hunter pickup?
Because it’s not sold in Australia
Not class leading its the only pallet sized tub for a new ute unless you get an older model amarok
Triton can be good as or better now to be fair to take number one spot 😊
Why big rims when it’s a 4wd? And common sense says 16< rims and steelies
He says to like the video before we get started. Shouldn't we wait to see if we like the video first?
Did he say a Toyota Xlt ranger?!?!
I thought the same
“2.0-litre XLT Ranger”
Can't work for carsales and be in the most popular brands pocket.
In Thailand they modified with the biggest turbo all the pickup truck for drag racing and track race mostly they use Isuzu but in standard engine Isuzu is not good enough power, Mitsubishi is the best interm of speed performance sterling design safety features gearbox and intelligent engineering, Ford ranger second choice, Nissan Isuzu third choice,I hope in future Mitsubishi built the new Mitsubishi pajero and Triton with the best technology suspension from Citroen and ladders body structure bullet proof like the GWM tank of china
strong body body frame
You guys are all partial to Ford you never mention cheapness unreliability poor history poor engineering put into the ranger. Ford has had same problems gear box issues for 10 years yet you still recommend it.
Why don't these reviewers mention that this shares the navara platform ? And, get off that ford train, you'll embarrass yourself long term.
Ranger better except for reliability 😂 makes sense.
I want a reliable vehicle not a Fix Or Repair Delay
Introducing the new mitsubishi ranger
Two turbos to replace after 150 miles. No thanx.
10 years from now, that Ford will be at the shop dying and spitting engine parts.
Shit review
I got a new triton they are bloody fantastic GSR.
Did i hear that right ? 3.5 cm longer 😂😂😂
What a load of crap this review
No thx
NO MANUAL ? THAT IS STUPID THATS ALL I OWN MITSUBISHI TRITON THE MANUAL DON'T MAKE ME TURN AWAY MITSUBISHI
It's 2024 manuals a thing of the past mate
why don't you LEARN how to drive proper where im from NO TRAFFIC Lights here@@ItzDonskii
Why don't you take the time to LEARN how to drive a manual car Donald, where im from NO TRAFFIC Lights here
why the stupid background music
Feature artist this month. It'll change for next few vids, don't worry.
Chrome 🤮 so 70’s style
yuck.
Shitty review. 4wd said the gearbox is literally one of the best.