Bruh I see this video today and I cannot believe you won this At least I can shut people's mouths saying it is possible winning a Nuker war (TBH right here. Even if you win a nuclear war. I will never sleep at night both eyes close. Regardless if I won or not*
It is scary how close this kind of thing is getting to reality for the US, given stealth capabilities on our missiles and EKVs on ground based and ship based missile defense. Not to even mention defenses like THAAD and patriot. It is not at all outside the realm of possibility that the USA could pull this off with most countries that have nukes given the comparatively tiny arsenals most have today.
@@MrLittlelawyer Not true, complete opposite actually as Russia and China have hypersonic missiles with NK just testing their own successful version. So until the US can catch up in the hypersonic game, the only countries getting stealth nuked is the west
@@MrLittlelawyer not to mention as recent events have shown even our closet rivals are leagues away from even coming close to matching us. and with the growing importance of multi-dimensional avenues such as the critical importance of economics and geography, allies, and political factors and how they intersect and affect and are affected my military concerns. it's getting to the point there is realistically no legit force on this planet who could ever hope to even survive a fight against the US. nevermind win. Except for the US itself ironically...
The USA in a future war will either completely fall under its own weight and collapse into states like the HRE’s or be more united then ever and become the absolute world hegemon
Thank you for playing DEFCON. Please do not be alarmed at the DOD marked sedan pulling into your driveway. Some gentlmen in blue uniforms representing the United States Air and Space Forces would like very much to have a chat with you sir.
I remember playing this game on LAN in my office back in the day. It had a specific game mode that was designed to play out over 8 hours to let you play it at work, and give fairly unassuming alerts in your status bar to let you know if other players did important stuff like launch missiles. The program had a "boss key" where it would instantly minimize if you were playing and your boss came around. Good times.
Thanks! I’ve also done this from the Russian perspective and won with zero casualties. That’s available on this channel. Subscribe for more content! I’ll be doing DEFCON streams again soon on my Twitch Superpower Broadcasting! 🤠
Pro tip for newer players. Launch all your bombers into the distance somewhere on the map.From your air bases, and aircraft carriers. u should have close to 50 bombers out at the same time. Once all of them are out u just order them 1 by 1 to nuke 1 continent. Then u use ur silos to fire ICBMS and your submarines. and by the time all of it comes together u have over 60 ICBMS on top of 1 continent. At that point no amount of defenses can stop so many nukes at the same time. Most games i play by the end of the game i have 0 nukes left and at least 70% of them hit cities because i swarm my enemies with an overwhelming amount of nukes.
Unthinkable would have been a slog through Eastern Europe with roughly one bomb a week as the allies plus Germany attempted to deplete the lend-lease equipment the Soviets had just been given, and then deplete their manpower advantage (doable with American artillery doctrine) while formenting revolution in the various Russian slave states. Meanwhile the marines land in kamchatka and start heading west.
Honestly I think it homes on how this type of war would play out: Behind a keyboard in a silent room full of onlookers watching pixels on a screen as estimated numbers go up
He just casually wins a conflict where everyone usually die. I mean you still have radioactive particles probably all over the earth now and potential nuclear winter but win is a win.
This game is terrifying for some reason. Just the silence barring the ambience, and watching explosions killing millions of people in an instant just appear as a... number. It's probably the eeriest game I've ever played.
Counterforce. Part of the reason the us no longer is so concerned about developing interceptors. The other half is the improved triggers on us nuclear weapons that allow evenly slightly off course warheads to successfully attack hardened launchers.
Counterforce is more difficult now than it was 40 years ago though. Russia, China, and North Korea deploy road-mobile ICBMs that can move around. North Korea is the most mobile and doesn’t have any fixed silos. If the US were to ever strike North Korea, it would carry a very high risk of not getting all the launchers they hide in the mountains and forests and they have an 18k kilometre range these days so they can reach everywhere
@@SuperPGamingyou say that as if they didnt issue wooden Armour for their soldiers, the nirth coreans have half a nuke, the chinese have maybe 3 if the ignitions work and the russians better hope that they dont blow up in the silos
@@tunderstorm2769The greatest mistake is underestimating the enemy. What I say, is that there's alot more money invested into countermeasures than people say. I lived next to a 'totally not active wink wink' base awhile back. I'm confident it's an installation for nuclear defenses because it's right on the Canadian border.
@@sensha5470 bro we have a rouge agency that is basically controlling every facet of our daily life, if they thought the russians were gonna be a problem, the russians wpuldnt exist anymore
@@tunderstorm2769China definitely has more than 3 nukes. Russia’s may be in disrepair, but you can’t discount any nuclear threat. I get the feeling the PLA is a joke, but that doesn’t mean their nuclear forces can’t be effective.
"We have the last of our missiles to survive the first strike launched! Even if we die, we will destroy America with us!" ... _"WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU MEAN THEY SHOT IT DO-"_ *nuclear explosion sound effects*
@@bonanlin4972As far as I know the nuclear air-to-air missiles were intended to be fired into the midst of the predicted massive soviet bomber formations, so that only one interceptor could be used to knock down the entire formation
@@bonanlin4972it’s a different type of nuke. Not a city erasing nuke but more of a fuck everything in this general area one. Like someone pointed out, they were to be used against Soviet plane walls because Russians don’t know any other tactics than throw everything at them all at once. You send one small yield nuclear warhead in the center or around the formation, it either destroys the planes or EMP’s them, basically destroying them.
I really don't mind horror games or sad games, but this game man, I just feel huge guilt and sadness whenever I see the bombs drop and see those awful numbers.. Man.
Using the aerial launched missiles to soak up their initial defense while suppressing their inclination to let off rounds. Securing supremacy in the Pacific and Atlantic to deny them routes for air launches to the states. Firing off your land missiles first, then firing your submarine missiles last, to combine the arrival times for a massive merciless strike to overwhelm what defensive capability remained. The generous thing about this scenario is that Russia has battle ready carriers. Aside from this masterclass of strategy, imagine a world where Russia and only Russia is vanquished by nuclear fire. An entire nation reduced to ruin while its attempt to secure mutually assured destruction failed miserably. The US just demonstrated that there IS indeed a way to WIN a nuclear war, and only they can do it, by just doing it.
Thanks. Obviously this is just a game, and both sides in this game have 316 nuclear warheads. In reality Russia has over 6500, and the USA has over 6000. So even if the attacker played all their cards right and attacked first, they would likely still suffer a counter-attack that gets through. I think Russia is more likely to fire first in the event of WW3 because they know the US has a technical advantage on conventional forces, and the Kremlin would want to get their nukes out the tubes before the US wipes out their ability to retaliate. This is why brinksmanship with Russia is so dangerous, and why the conflict in Ukraine is concerning due to its potential to escalate
to be fair the only way to Win a nuclear war is be the surprising attacker and also use extreme aggression on key attack points to secure retaliation attempts and worst case prepare to accept mass loss for the victory
Yeah there’s a great film from the 1970s called First Strike where the Soviets win a scenario like this. Could still happen today since America doesn’t seriously invest in ABM tech
@@SuperPGamingis almost a trillion dollars a year not enough??? It’s not how much money you have, it’s how you use it. Instead of creating a bunch of massively over budget radical new designs that are almost designed to fail, iterate on what you know works to create improved versions of tried and tested designs. Basically, be less like America and more like china.
@@LeavingGoose046 The F-117 is decades old and is still (practically) undetectable. Now many of the US’s allies have extremely capable 5th gen stealth multirole fighters. The F-22, even though it’s only owned by the US, can still easily take down as many planes as the missiles it can carry. Only China (maybe) has 5th gen aircraft. NK has planes from the 50s. And on that “reiterating on old designs”, we do it because they’re _good,_ the only reason the MCX SPEAR is replacing the M4 is because of worries over russian body armor, which is something russian soldiers have to buy themselves. The F-15 was made to be incredibly capable, and it’s a gun truck of a multirole fighter. And that is all to say: yeah I think the west’s military power is doing pretty good. Doesn’t mean though that we’re invulnerable, of course, but we can absolutely, please excuse my language, “fuck shit up real bad” if we have to.
Even as a proud citizen of the United States, this scenario is tragic. I'm glad that such a scenario exists, however unlikely it is. Still, not only will the entire Soviet territory likely be rendered uninhabitable for upwards of 50 years (nuclear bombs are not power plants, not nearly as many particles to stick around), but the world would have seen the true devastation of nuclear war and see a winner. Nuclear warfare would either be made normalized - or more thankfully taboo. The loss would be unimaginable, probably upwards of 2-3x the amount from World War 2. Just the humaniterian crisis alone for Europe and the rest of Asia would be astonishing for the world to bear. I hope we never have to resort to nuclear war ever, and if it does come to that, the damage be mitigated as much as possible.
General Krukov: We must unleash our nuclear weapons! Annihilate them all! Dasha Fedorovich: Excuse me, general? General Krukov: Our Nuclear weapons? Our atomic bombs?!
If america mr housed the nukes and won the great war they wouldnt be able to do much of anything except hold themselves together for a few decades after their victory due to the civillian chaos itd bring and the refugee crisis itd cause. Armies fleets and air wings would come home en masse to fight a war in their own country against the afterath. The US would survive but become something new
@@Justin-ui5ti For some reason, I can hear Senator Armstrong saying that. “It’s America’s destiny to rule the world Jack. And we will rule the world after we reclaim the wasteland.”
Nuclear strategy be like: ICBM - Wow! You researched a really cool technology! Now you can make even better nukes, and maybe win! DEFCON: “General, the aerial campaign was a success.” “Casualties?” “Twelve pilots.” “Retaliation?” “Nothing yet, sir. We’ll likely see a retaliation soon” “What did we hit?” “Moscow, Saint Petersburg, and Yekaterinburg” “I…. How many?” “19.2 million within range of effect. Estimated lives between 12 and 16 million.” … “Jesus Christ, what have I done?” “No turning back now general”
And this is why cultural/economic warfare has been so popular in modern times, the fact that there are major conflicts popping up is extremely worrisome
The AI in DEFCON won't immediately launch all their missiles once DEFCON 1 hits. They will wait for a mass strike once a bit of time has passed after 1. Hence, why a first strike, if successful since silos have AA, if they aren't launching missiles, will most definitely cripple a player.
And just like that, we’ve officially completely missed the point of DEFCON. Look upon my works ye mighty and despair, says the US as the last crumbling island in the irradiated wasteland…
@@SuperPGaming Quoting ozymandias would’ve sufficed but that works too. Winning a game that you’re not supposed to be able to “win” is impressive, don’t get me wrong, but I certainly hope that the irony isn’t lost on ya.
Thank you everyone for 30k views! On a channel with fewer than 100 subscribers, that means a lot! Let me know if you would like to see me do more DEFCON gameplay videos or if you have any other feedback. Be sure to subscribe to my main channel Superpower Broadcasting for politics and news commentary! 🎉
I wonder how the AI strategizes in this one. I did not notice where all of the Russias subs went, some were destroyed in the pacific, but I would expect there to be more. Those could have eliminated your silos when you started launching, if any where in range But for sure the AI could have scored some hits even when it launched if it targeted west coast cities - they were too far from the silos to be defended I think.
I have this game. You haven't seen true skill yet. The day I earned respect on multiplayer was the day I brought down the silos of my opponent without having ever seen them. I still lost the game but won something more important.
Some 86 million innocent people died and there's probably going to be a surge in cancer and infertility rates across Asia and Europe, but at least America's fine! You have to keep in mind this is still a nuclear war's best case scenario.
I learned a lot from this Gameplay :) Alaska is not worth it to put Silos. Only a radar and maybe an Air base... All silos should be in the same spot for an efficient defence. Didn't know submarines can sumerge and emerge lol When DEFCON I is reached I have to slow down the game speed and launch at the same time all ICBMS to overwhelm the adversary's air defense. Interceptors must be sent even if the threat isn't in range. Interceptors and strategic bombers from airbases can be send to aircraft carriers to replace the destroyed units. Thanks! I'll destroy the IA next time!
I noctice the winning move here was baiting the enemy to get close before swarming them with alot of Air support in the pacific front. The atlantic front, for the most part was inactive as both sides paid most of their mind to the active war zone in the pacific. However the north atlantic fleet was moving deep into siberian waters undisturbed and what little activity was spotted was presumably by the enemy, united states aircraft do to bombing runs, but in reality were there for both bombing runs but also into gathering to track the enemy radar, Missles and airstrips. With all that in mind the player went on the offensive shen he got saod information, and uitilized the ICBMS mixed with the northern fleet to overwhelm the enemies anti air defenses and secured victory as a result. As for why the enemy missles didnt come through. Most of the players resources stuck closer to home and thus was able to properly defend. Good game!
Cool! You managed to make a perfect ending for a depressing game. There's also a game about playing with casualties, called Concrete tremor, but it has a scripted ending
@JosephSimoneAverageJoey2000 nevermind it's 2am and I should sleep. I confused the nuclear target icon with the launch notification alert. Damn I should really sleep. Love the little detail
So here's a question. What would ypu do with Missile Destroyer units? Three mode units with fragility and limited ammo. They have long ranged naval combat missiles, and long ranged air defense missiles. Their radar vision is decent, and they have the ability to slowly fire a limit stock of ballistic missile interceptors, with best chances in the first/last 5 seconds of flight.
![DEFCON 6-CPU Player Simulation [HD]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/mCpVpIBqaJg/mqdefault.jpg)
![Blox Fruits Dragon Rework Update [Full Stream]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/EqDAp8udhm0/mqdefault.jpg)
Welcome to all the new viewers! Be sure to subscribe to my channel here for lots of based gaming content! 🤠
Bruh I see this video today and I cannot believe you won this
At least I can shut people's mouths saying it is possible winning a Nuker war
(TBH right here. Even if you win a nuclear war. I will never sleep at night both eyes close. Regardless if I won or not*
I wish I played this game so I could fully understand how good and precise this run was
@@erikpasquale9902 It's such a fun game
"The only winning move is not to play."
this guy: "Skill issue."
🤠
Ah shit you made the joke a day before I did
well in this game, everyone loses. its all about who loses the less
@@atom1236in a more realistic scenario, yes.
Yet this is a game
@@atom1236 Did you watch the video?
Waiter: “and what would you like to order sir?”
Him: “Mutually Assured Destruction… Hold the Mutually”
🤠☢️😎
"And a side of crispy commies."
🦅
@@techypriest7523Kentucky Fried Commies
@@robertmiralles6334Kapitalist Fried Commies
this man won a nuclear war
It is scary how close this kind of thing is getting to reality for the US, given stealth capabilities on our missiles and EKVs on ground based and ship based missile defense. Not to even mention defenses like THAAD and patriot.
It is not at all outside the realm of possibility that the USA could pull this off with most countries that have nukes given the comparatively tiny arsenals most have today.
@@MrLittlelawyer Not true, complete opposite actually as Russia and China have hypersonic missiles with NK just testing their own successful version. So until the US can catch up in the hypersonic game, the only countries getting stealth nuked is the west
@@MrLittlelawyer not to mention as recent events have shown even our closet rivals are leagues away from even coming close to matching us. and with the growing importance of multi-dimensional avenues such as the critical importance of economics and geography, allies, and political factors and how they intersect and affect and are affected my military concerns. it's getting to the point there is realistically no legit force on this planet who could ever hope to even survive a fight against the US. nevermind win.
Except for the US itself ironically...
The USA in a future war will either completely fall under its own weight and collapse into states like the HRE’s or be more united then ever and become the absolute world hegemon
No, he won a pretend game
Thank you for playing DEFCON. Please do not be alarmed at the DOD marked sedan pulling into your driveway. Some gentlmen in blue uniforms representing the United States Air and Space Forces would like very much to have a chat with you sir.
Ender’s Game lol
😂
"The Enemy's Gate Is Down".
Ender knew how to really "Game Over"
@@vic3royimagine on the news "the former soviet republics have been vanquished by nuclear fire" and this guy is like what
Wait. WAIT-
The only audio of clicking keys really makes this feel isolated. like your just the person in a bunker clicking humanity away into oblivion.
Yep it was one of the first gaming videos I ever filmed lol
Except its only Russia hes destroying cause he got no causalties
I remember playing this game on LAN in my office back in the day. It had a specific game mode that was designed to play out over 8 hours to let you play it at work, and give fairly unassuming alerts in your status bar to let you know if other players did important stuff like launch missiles. The program had a "boss key" where it would instantly minimize if you were playing and your boss came around. Good times.
Oh man I love this game. I started playing around when it came out.
I wish I streamed back then
I had it when it came out in a box with disk . I still loved it enough to buy it almost as soon as I got a steam account
@@Sorrowablaze same here
More games should have this "boss key" 🤣
@@theace228 the best games were developed by and for guys in tech with no real work to do so they sounded busy tapping keys.
Soviet Premier watching as the Kremlin gets leveled because the U.S did some sick micro:
The full power of gaming chair & socks.
@@copter2000 Oh hell no . . The damn knee socks? Bro isn't some high school anime girl
@@Founder6087That’s all you brother…. all he said was socks …..
“The only winning move is not to play”
Nuh uh
😎
The only winning move is to get gud
100%! 🤠
(Santa traveling over western Russia) Well HO HO…HOOOLY SHIT!!!
😂🤣😅
A lot of US government officials got coal in their stockings that day
"Why are they ruining the Christmas joy with all out nuclear warfare????????"
@@RipRLeeErmey "it was getting cold, so we made it warmer"
I’m glad I’m not the only person who noticed
I always suspected if played well this was plausible but i was never a good enough strategist to make it happen, nice work
Thanks! I’ve also done this from the Russian perspective and won with zero casualties. That’s available on this channel.
Subscribe for more content! I’ll be doing DEFCON streams again soon on my Twitch Superpower Broadcasting! 🤠
“The Soviets got a little too close to one of our planes, so we decided to drop several suns on them just in case they had any funny ideas.”
“They tried to touch the boats, no one touches the boats”
Pro tip for newer players. Launch all your bombers into the distance somewhere on the map.From your air bases, and aircraft carriers. u should have close to 50 bombers out at the same time. Once all of them are out u just order them 1 by 1 to nuke 1 continent. Then u use ur silos to fire ICBMS and your submarines. and by the time all of it comes together u have over 60 ICBMS on top of 1 continent. At that point no amount of defenses can stop so many nukes at the same time. Most games i play by the end of the game i have 0 nukes left and at least 70% of them hit cities because i swarm my enemies with an overwhelming amount of nukes.
Strategic Air Command.
and therein lies the cold war
Bro re-invented operation chrome dome
So you did what would likely happen if Operation Unthinkable had occurred? The US just swarming the enemy with Nukes?
Unthinkable would have been a slog through Eastern Europe with roughly one bomb a week as the allies plus Germany attempted to deplete the lend-lease equipment the Soviets had just been given, and then deplete their manpower advantage (doable with American artillery doctrine) while formenting revolution in the various Russian slave states. Meanwhile the marines land in kamchatka and start heading west.
this man should get a job at NORAD
For real 🙏
Imagine sitting in an underground control room and watching one guy solo the Soviet Union in a nuclear war
I can imagine 😎
Is anyone else noticed that Santa Claus Is literally delivering presents to Russia as America glasses have the fucking continent
The mouse and keyboard are almost as loud as a nuclear war
Ikr! This was one of the first gaming videos I ever recorded.
I think it adds to the experience, honestly. Makes each individual order feel like it has weight behind it.
Honestly I think it homes on how this type of war would play out: Behind a keyboard in a silent room full of onlookers watching pixels on a screen as estimated numbers go up
@@scyfrix i feel the same, the clicking along the music and beeps of the game adds to the atmosphere
Do you folks think I should make more DEFCON content?
"You could never win a nuclear war! It would be mutually assured destruction!"
This mf: mutually assured destruction my ass
He just casually wins a conflict where everyone usually die. I mean you still have radioactive particles probably all over the earth now and potential nuclear winter but win is a win.
@@АртёмКондратьев-ы2з Radiation would actually dissipate in a few weeks, the whole radiation myth is just propaganda to keep us safe.
This game is terrifying for some reason. Just the silence barring the ambience, and watching explosions killing millions of people in an instant just appear as a... number. It's probably the eeriest game I've ever played.
This game and Space Engine give me a feeling I can’t quite pin down
This game is kinda depressing too.
Making this salient is definitely one of the reasons this game was made.
HARPOON would give me the same feeling, especially because you get audible alerts out of the dead silence.
Imagine being that second wave of bombers flying over western Russia after it's been nuked. The pure desolation as you look down below.
The only winning move...
is to win.
😎🤠☢️
The only winning move is to have more nukes and SAMs than the other guy
21:51
Santa: Why there so many suns on the ground!?!
Yeah Santa needs to work on his flyin skills. Dude was flying right through the plumes
Hey, at least he has less kids to deliver to now
@@SuperPGamingyou cut off Santa's job by a whole 8 hours by committing a zero hour on russia
I thought this was Mutually Assured Destruction, not an I win, you lose situation lol
MAD is a thing of the past.
This is first strike for the win.
@@SuperPGamingwinning a nuclear war is the coldest thing you can do, literally. Nice videos friend
Most people would still die in the ensuing nuclear winter
@@mevolander8478Or radiation poisoning
This right here is some Assured Destruction
"WHAT DO YOU MEAN HE WON A NUCLEAR WAR"
Counterforce. Part of the reason the us no longer is so concerned about developing interceptors. The other half is the improved triggers on us nuclear weapons that allow evenly slightly off course warheads to successfully attack hardened launchers.
Counterforce is more difficult now than it was 40 years ago though.
Russia, China, and North Korea deploy road-mobile ICBMs that can move around. North Korea is the most mobile and doesn’t have any fixed silos.
If the US were to ever strike North Korea, it would carry a very high risk of not getting all the launchers they hide in the mountains and forests and they have an 18k kilometre range these days so they can reach everywhere
@@SuperPGamingyou say that as if they didnt issue wooden Armour for their soldiers, the nirth coreans have half a nuke, the chinese have maybe 3 if the ignitions work and the russians better hope that they dont blow up in the silos
@@tunderstorm2769The greatest mistake is underestimating the enemy.
What I say, is that there's alot more money invested into countermeasures than people say. I lived next to a 'totally not active wink wink' base awhile back. I'm confident it's an installation for nuclear defenses because it's right on the Canadian border.
@@sensha5470 bro we have a rouge agency that is basically controlling every facet of our daily life, if they thought the russians were gonna be a problem, the russians wpuldnt exist anymore
@@tunderstorm2769China definitely has more than 3 nukes. Russia’s may be in disrepair, but you can’t discount any nuclear threat. I get the feeling the PLA is a joke, but that doesn’t mean their nuclear forces can’t be effective.
The last Russian missile operator watching as the concept of Mutual Assured Destruction is quite literally destroyed before his very eyes:
"We have the last of our missiles to survive the first strike launched! Even if we die, we will destroy America with us!"
...
_"WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU MEAN THEY SHOT IT DO-"_
*nuclear explosion sound effects*
I've never watch gameplay of Defcon before so I was amused in seeing the "Santaclause NORAD" indicator
Santa isn’t scared of a couple hundred high yield airbursts. He has Rudolph and the gang 🎅
Where?
Over Russia
Chance of total victory 1 to 78.000.000
This guy: "Everybody dies? Not on my watch"
🤠
Santa: hohoho merry Christmas
Soviet Union: Burns in atomic fire
I like how you used a nuke to kill a fighter @ 27:59
You know it! By Dawn’s Early Light energy !!
I mean, early Cold War we were developing air-to-air nuclear missiles
@@Fluff_gobocatWhy did we do that? It sounds like a waste of resources to use a nuke against a plane.
@@bonanlin4972As far as I know the nuclear air-to-air missiles were intended to be fired into the midst of the predicted massive soviet bomber formations, so that only one interceptor could be used to knock down the entire formation
@@bonanlin4972it’s a different type of nuke. Not a city erasing nuke but more of a fuck everything in this general area one.
Like someone pointed out, they were to be used against Soviet plane walls because Russians don’t know any other tactics than throw everything at them all at once. You send one small yield nuclear warhead in the center or around the formation, it either destroys the planes or EMP’s them, basically destroying them.
"The only way to win is not to... FIRST STRIKE NOW!!!"
This guy should be in charge if a real nuclear war happens
😎
Sure, why not, we’re screwed either way
@@oberonpanopticonclearly not with him in charge
@@matthewjones39 he destroyed half the world. I’m not an expert, but I suspect that doing something like that would have consequences
@@oberonpanopticonThe consequence is the removal of a threat
"The only winning move is not to... wait, hold on, I think I got this. Yeah, let's do this".
damn, I'm jealous I was terrible at this game. Also never seen the Santa easter egg lol that was hilarious
Time to give gifts to all the good boys and girls in Mos... New York!
bro heard "mutually assured destruction" and responded with "nuh uh"
😎
The alternate universe when the movie war games ai says “winning move found”
Let’s go! 👾
1:40 Santa skips no day when delivering presents even during Nuclear War
i only hope we are so lucky if this really pops off
I really hope you are not.
@@elFulbertoWhat?
@@elFulberto L
@@elFulbertoFound the anarchist.
Please expound on your political position of wanting 320 million people dead. Would love to hear what other great ideas you have as well.@@elFulberto
I really don't mind horror games or sad games, but this game man, I just feel huge guilt and sadness whenever I see the bombs drop and see those awful numbers.. Man.
It’s a very well made game despite its nominal simplicity
no guilt if they land only on soviet territory
@@AdrianRO1918 based based based
@@awesomedude222silence yourself, your input was not needed.
Santa flying above Russia: "Ho Ho Holy crap!"
🎅😅
Using the aerial launched missiles to soak up their initial defense while suppressing their inclination to let off rounds.
Securing supremacy in the Pacific and Atlantic to deny them routes for air launches to the states.
Firing off your land missiles first, then firing your submarine missiles last, to combine the arrival times for a massive merciless strike to overwhelm what defensive capability remained.
The generous thing about this scenario is that Russia has battle ready carriers.
Aside from this masterclass of strategy, imagine a world where Russia and only Russia is vanquished by nuclear fire. An entire nation reduced to ruin while its attempt to secure mutually assured destruction failed miserably. The US just demonstrated that there IS indeed a way to WIN a nuclear war, and only they can do it, by just doing it.
Thanks.
Obviously this is just a game, and both sides in this game have 316 nuclear warheads.
In reality Russia has over 6500, and the USA has over 6000. So even if the attacker played all their cards right and attacked first, they would likely still suffer a counter-attack that gets through.
I think Russia is more likely to fire first in the event of WW3 because they know the US has a technical advantage on conventional forces, and the Kremlin would want to get their nukes out the tubes before the US wipes out their ability to retaliate.
This is why brinksmanship with Russia is so dangerous, and why the conflict in Ukraine is concerning due to its potential to escalate
to be fair the only way to Win a nuclear war is be the surprising attacker and also use extreme aggression on key attack points to secure retaliation attempts and worst case prepare to accept mass loss for the victory
Yeah there’s a great film from the 1970s called First Strike where the Soviets win a scenario like this.
Could still happen today since America doesn’t seriously invest in ABM tech
@@SuperPGamingprobably more than the warsaw pact though, considering that they will likely join forces
Western countries need to start spending on our defence before we have to when it might be too late
@@SuperPGamingis almost a trillion dollars a year not enough??? It’s not how much money you have, it’s how you use it. Instead of creating a bunch of massively over budget radical new designs that are almost designed to fail, iterate on what you know works to create improved versions of tried and tested designs. Basically, be less like America and more like china.
@@LeavingGoose046 The F-117 is decades old and is still (practically) undetectable.
Now many of the US’s allies have extremely capable 5th gen stealth multirole fighters.
The F-22, even though it’s only owned by the US, can still easily take down as many planes as the missiles it can carry.
Only China (maybe) has 5th gen aircraft.
NK has planes from the 50s.
And on that “reiterating on old designs”, we do it because they’re _good,_ the only reason the MCX SPEAR is replacing the M4 is because of worries over russian body armor, which is something russian soldiers have to buy themselves.
The F-15 was made to be incredibly capable, and it’s a gun truck of a multirole fighter.
And that is all to say: yeah I think the west’s military power is doing pretty good. Doesn’t mean though that we’re invulnerable, of course, but we can absolutely, please excuse my language, “fuck shit up real bad” if we have to.
Even as a proud citizen of the United States, this scenario is tragic. I'm glad that such a scenario exists, however unlikely it is. Still, not only will the entire Soviet territory likely be rendered uninhabitable for upwards of 50 years (nuclear bombs are not power plants, not nearly as many particles to stick around), but the world would have seen the true devastation of nuclear war and see a winner. Nuclear warfare would either be made normalized - or more thankfully taboo. The loss would be unimaginable, probably upwards of 2-3x the amount from World War 2. Just the humaniterian crisis alone for Europe and the rest of Asia would be astonishing for the world to bear. I hope we never have to resort to nuclear war ever, and if it does come to that, the damage be mitigated as much as possible.
Correct. It’s genuinely scary seeing NAFO accounts come out openly hoping for the US to do this. In reality Russia would fire back.
We all hid under our desks for nothing!
General Krukov: We must unleash our nuclear weapons! Annihilate them all!
Dasha Fedorovich: Excuse me, general?
General Krukov: Our Nuclear weapons? Our atomic bombs?!
USA(🦅): No kills?
😎🤠😂
Can’t wait for alternate universe fallout where America survives the Great War and invades the post apocalyptic earth
If america mr housed the nukes and won the great war they wouldnt be able to do much of anything except hold themselves together for a few decades after their victory due to the civillian chaos itd bring and the refugee crisis itd cause. Armies fleets and air wings would come home en masse to fight a war in their own country against the afterath. The US would survive but become something new
Freedom is spread through nuclear warheads.
That sounds sick
A Grand Order of Manifest Destiny to reclaim the Earth and restore the human order?
I think I can get behind that.
@@Justin-ui5ti For some reason, I can hear Senator Armstrong saying that.
“It’s America’s destiny to rule the world Jack. And we will rule the world after we reclaim the wasteland.”
DEFCON is a game every person should play. Its so simple yet so haunting...
Finally, Mutually Assured Destruction but only with the Assured Destruction.
UMM was that Santa? just cruising over Russia during Armageddon
Yup yup 👍
minmaxxing the apocalypse is crazy work
😎🤠
Nuclear strategy be like:
ICBM -
Wow! You researched a really cool technology! Now you can make even better nukes, and maybe win!
DEFCON:
“General, the aerial campaign was a success.”
“Casualties?”
“Twelve pilots.”
“Retaliation?”
“Nothing yet, sir. We’ll likely see a retaliation soon”
“What did we hit?”
“Moscow, Saint Petersburg, and Yekaterinburg”
“I…. How many?”
“19.2 million within range of effect. Estimated lives between 12 and 16 million.”
…
“Jesus Christ, what have I done?”
“No turning back now general”
The government: we have AI!
The people: bro we already have this guy, why you wasting our money on skynet?
The Soviets have deployed their nuclear defense Santa!
Saint Nickolay has entered the area! Destroy it before its too late!
you're telling me you WON nuclear war?
Yes. Twice.
Checkout my video playing as the Russians against the US and winning without a single casualty. It’s also on my channel. 😎🤠☺️
Well, he won a highly simplified game about nuclear war depending on your definition of winning!
And this is why cultural/economic warfare has been so popular in modern times, the fact that there are major conflicts popping up is extremely worrisome
Did Soviets not launch any missiles or did I just not see it?
Why did they wait so late?
Ikr. The USSR is notorious for jumping to press the big red button. Why did they do nothing? They should of detected the silo launches.
The AI in DEFCON won't immediately launch all their missiles once DEFCON 1 hits. They will wait for a mass strike once a bit of time has passed after 1. Hence, why a first strike, if successful since silos have AA, if they aren't launching missiles, will most definitely cripple a player.
“WRITE THAT DOWN, WRITE THAT DOWN!”
🤠
And just like that, we’ve officially completely missed the point of DEFCON. Look upon my works ye mighty and despair, says the US as the last crumbling island in the irradiated wasteland…
Well the point is for me to win and get total domination. Point: achieved 🤠😎☢️
@@SuperPGaming Quoting ozymandias would’ve sufficed but that works too.
Winning a game that you’re not supposed to be able to “win” is impressive, don’t get me wrong, but I certainly hope that the irony isn’t lost on ya.
Makes me wanna go play Uplink again.
This is my first time seeing DEFCON gameplay. It's a powerful work of art.
@20:25 santa claus barely survives a nuke
Thank you everyone for 30k views! On a channel with fewer than 100 subscribers, that means a lot!
Let me know if you would like to see me do more DEFCON gameplay videos or if you have any other feedback.
Be sure to subscribe to my main channel Superpower Broadcasting for politics and news commentary! 🎉
30k? More like 130k, loved the video and good luck my man.
Thanks!
WHAT IS THE GAME
@@ajeltheflightsimmer DEFCON! 🤠☢️
@@SuperPGaming Oh lol I didn't see that one.
those people in NORAD were glad that Joshua hadn't found out the Kevin Castley maneuver... imagine otherwise
😼🤠😎
I always forget that the studio that made this game also made Prison Architect
why was there a santa clause in the atlanic 2:33
santa likes nukes bro
Can you shoot him down?
I think it is a reference to the "NORAD tracks Santa Claus"
If we were so lucky and if it ever came to this.
Or like in the Metro series
There's only one quote that fits here:
"Mein Führer, I can walk!"
#IYKYK
I used to set this game to only cpu players and just watch it go.
It’s a lot of fun! I’ll be doing more DEFCON content now as a result of the increased demand for it.
Let’s make this the meme game of 2024!
This is the scariest sound design I've ever seen in a game before
Yeah it’s epic
Mutually assured destruction is scared of him
😎
NSA: Son, I'd like to ask you a couple questions.
🤠
I wonder how the AI strategizes in this one.
I did not notice where all of the Russias subs went, some were destroyed in the pacific, but I would expect there to be more. Those could have eliminated your silos when you started launching, if any where in range
But for sure the AI could have scored some hits even when it launched if it targeted west coast cities - they were too far from the silos to be defended I think.
Depending on the time DEFCON takes place, the Soviet/Russian Navy could've been tiny due to antequated or ill-maintained assets.
What’s up with the Santa sleigh?!😂
Santa likes nukes
I have this game. You haven't seen true skill yet.
The day I earned respect on multiplayer was the day I brought down the silos of my opponent without having ever seen them. I still lost the game but won something more important.
Some 86 million innocent people died and there's probably going to be a surge in cancer and infertility rates across Asia and Europe, but at least America's fine! You have to keep in mind this is still a nuclear war's best case scenario.
Correct.
That’s why I’m against sending NATO troops to Ukraine.
But DEFCON is just a game. A game I dominate.
the only winning move is not to play
oh and theres also this ig
For real
I learned a lot from this Gameplay :)
Alaska is not worth it to put Silos. Only a radar and maybe an Air base...
All silos should be in the same spot for an efficient defence.
Didn't know submarines can sumerge and emerge lol
When DEFCON I is reached I have to slow down the game speed and launch at the same time all ICBMS to overwhelm the adversary's air defense.
Interceptors must be sent even if the threat isn't in range.
Interceptors and strategic bombers from airbases can be send to aircraft carriers to replace the destroyed units.
Thanks! I'll destroy the IA next time!
Yup!
You should make DEFCON streams and videos. Let’s bring this game back! ☢️🤠
I noctice the winning move here was baiting the enemy to get close before swarming them with alot of Air support in the pacific front. The atlantic front, for the most part was inactive as both sides paid most of their mind to the active war zone in the pacific.
However the north atlantic fleet was moving deep into siberian waters undisturbed and what little activity was spotted was presumably by the enemy, united states aircraft do to bombing runs, but in reality were there for both bombing runs but also into gathering to track the enemy radar, Missles and airstrips.
With all that in mind the player went on the offensive shen he got saod information, and uitilized the ICBMS mixed with the northern fleet to overwhelm the enemies anti air defenses and secured victory as a result. As for why the enemy missles didnt come through. Most of the players resources stuck closer to home and thus was able to properly defend.
Good game!
Thanks! 🤠
@SuperPGaming please let me know if I was mistaken on anything.
Anybody else find it grim as f*** the fact that he double tapped all the cities he already nuked?
😎
You achieved a result that General Turgidson could only dream of, well done.
The music has a “Kharack is burning. There’s nothing left for us here, let’s go.” kind of vibe and I know that’s intentional.
Real.
@@SuperPGaming oh mein got he got the reference!
This right here is some Assured Destruction lol
🤠
I like how you're ready to blow nuclear sand from Africa right onto the eastern seaboard of the USA. Great decision making there, General.
🤠
What’s a little fallout, supply chain collapse and possibly nuclear winter ever done to anybody?
Bro just said nuh uh to the whole „nobody wins a nuclear war” part of nuclear warfare
🤠
Cool! You managed to make a perfect ending for a depressing game. There's also a game about playing with casualties, called Concrete tremor, but it has a scripted ending
I’ll check it out! Thanks!
Watching this while high made me feel like I was sitting next to you just clicking away at the end of the world 😆
The only case of M.A.D. without the mutual part
Well technically there is another video on my channel of me doing this but from the perspective of Russia… So technically two cases 😊
They should make this simulation for more than just flat earthers.
Ikr 😅
Bro recreated the “Star Wars” missile defense system
what is the sleigh doing? how do I instantly reveal all the enemy silos like that lol
the sleigh is because NORAD tracks Santa Claus. don't know what you mean about revealing silos
Russia deployed a tactical Santa…
He’s not very effective!
@JosephSimoneAverageJoey2000 nevermind it's 2am and I should sleep. I confused the nuclear target icon with the launch notification alert. Damn I should really sleep.
Love the little detail
Wow, that's impressive! I've had some really good games before, but I always took at least one hit.
Thanks!
I might do more videos and show people how to win without taking civilian casualties
I like how player 1 did not launch a single nuke until less than 40 seconds remained
"The bombs may kill many, but the nuclear winter would kill more"
So here's a question. What would ypu do with Missile Destroyer units?
Three mode units with fragility and limited ammo.
They have long ranged naval combat missiles, and long ranged air defense missiles. Their radar vision is decent, and they have the ability to slowly fire a limit stock of ballistic missile interceptors, with best chances in the first/last 5 seconds of flight.
That would be cool. The game seems to be set tech wise in the early to mid Cold War. Subs have very short range for SLBMs
this video increases nuclear proliferation
Uh oh. Cuz it’s not the only DEFCON video on this channel 😬
Bro has a 100% win rate at tic tac toe
The Santa tracker LOL
☢️🎅🤠
This game could really do with a upbeat synthpop soundtrack, good match!
Pardon me, but icbm is next door
Some hard phonk music or the doom soundtrack lol
The subtitle for the game is "everybody dies", the angle is more about atmoic armageddon and less bubblegum RTS
99 Luftballons would fit the bill.
Seems more like Atom Bomb Baby for this play
"Mutually assured destruction? Haha, no son."
this is why we need 20 fleet carrier battlegroups on standby