How Would the United States Fight a Nuclear War?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 15 июл 2023
- Go to get.atlasvpn.com/ModernMuscle to get a 3-year plan for just $1.83 a month. It’s risk free with Atlas’s 30 day money back guarantee!
Today we’re going explore the unthinkable: How would the United States respond during a Nuclear conflict?
When we first came up with this concept, we aimed to cover the America's Nuclear Triad and it's Russian Nuclear War Plan in one concise video, but one video turned into three. So here's full version of "How Would the United States Fight a Nuclear War?" as it was originally intended. Enjoy!
Sources:
Probable Nuclear Targets in United Kingdom, 1972: robedwards.typepad.com/files/...
Probable Nuclear Targets in France: upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...
Soviet Union Central European Target List, 1979: brilliantmaps.com/ww3-europe/
United States Target List, 1956: nsarchive2.gwu.edu/nukevault/...
Probable United States Counterforce Targets: dspace.mit.edu/bitstream/hand...
US Russian Counterforce Target List:
www.nrdc.org/sites/default/fi... 
Авто/Мото
Go to get.atlasvpn.com/ModernMuscle to get a 3-year plan for just $1.83 a month. It’s risk free with Atlas’s 30 day money back guarantee!
just use water. you can kill all nukes from russia and china
Love your briefing videos very informative and professionally done
🐀
What's the name of the music?
@@WhYArEYouSoSeRiOuS This is what happens when you believe in hollywood, when you think you're exceptional, but the reality is that Marvel don't gonna be there, sorry kids.
Winning a nuclear war is just as terrible as losing it.
Yep, the dead loser or the living loser.
Not really. A better way to say this is that nuclear war is bad for everyone. Winning is obviously better than losing.
@@kflow1379 Or is it better not to start?
@@Neosapiant that's what I said but in a different way
No one wins in a war
“A strange game”
“The only winning move is not to play.”
"War does not determine who is right - only who is left."
- B.Russell
The nuclear arsenals of mass destruction, which are still not eliminated in spite of the UN charter, but well maintained and modernized and capable of multiple overkill, with whose deterrence powerful minorities may assert territorial claims to power and thereby put the entire human species and civilization at risk, although after an intentionally or unintentionally triggered nuclear war no more inhabitable territories remain in the following nuclear winter (which indicates an intelligence deficit bordering on mental derangement...)
need - in contrast to the heavily thematized climate change - with escalating nuclear war only a few days for the irreversible extinction of the human species and civilization - already after 5 hours the entire death rate of the 6 years long raging 2nd world war (thus 60.000.000 dead) would be exceeded .
That on Monday, the 26th September 1983 this irreversible downfall was prevented by the refusal of a firing order of the lieutenant colonel Stanislaw Petrow, who was on duty by proxy, which took place on wrongly interpreted observation data, is communicated remarkably just as little of the consequence of this decision appropriately for the public as the nuclear self-destruction capacity which is to be measured permanently ready after few days...
What is to be thought of an "intelligent" species which accepts to be completely threatened with irreversible extinction by powerful minorities for the enforcement of competing power systems, and which invests so much money and technical know-how in the provision and maintenance of its own destruction ?
I loved that movie.
Wargames
"War does not determine who is right - only who is left." - B.Russell
The last game...
"How about a nice game of chess?"
What’s kind of scary is this is just what’s public knowledge, who knows what else they have created over the years in secret.
The fact that humanity could literally undo millennia of progress in less time then it would take you to eat dinner at a sit down restaurant is chilling
humanity? no, just 2 o 3 countries
Same applies to many things in life like reputation, relationships etc.
Yes.
@@loudermusicHave you heard of radiation? There would be economic collapse that would cause starvation and anarchy globally.
Thank God we have IQ tests 😂@@loudermusic
40 years ago I was a US Air Force pneumatic/hydraulic technician on the Titan II ICBM in the Wichita Kansas area. Our shop not only repaired hydraulic functions on the missile but also the pop-up antenna (that automatically raised after a nuclear attack), plus the locking lugs on the blast doors (these were the huge doors made of ferro-reinforced concrete in between the silo and the launch crew area to protect the crew long enough to turn the keys and launch the missile).
Since our job was only to make sure the "bird" would actually work if the nuclear apocalypse happened, the Air Force taught us absolutely nothing about surviving a nuclear war, probably since it was pointless, and that was fine by me. Because one thing I realized on my own right away about surviving a nuclear war, is that I have no interest in surviving a nuclear war.
Yep. There are worse things in life than dying.
Thanks for sharing this! Do you know what would trigger the antenna to raise? Your comment makes me think it was expected for some bunkers to survive and launch after the first incoming nukes had already landed? Fascinating and terrifying at the same time
Ye it's a key turn launch process so why does everyone always say their going to push the fucking button 😂
After a nuclear war, I don't think anyone wants a single american or russian to survive either.
@@jonjolly253yes there is. Unjustly destroying a persons life, and then expecting them to try and keep living, is worse than dying, imo.
Plans look good on paper. Then, the sneaky Chinese drop an anvil on you from a party balloon.
At least we know Chinas ICBMs might as well be water balloons 😂
@@sonicboom4732 Manufacturer Acme Corporation 😂😅
@@sonicboom4732 People are still spouting this propoganda point. Watch Perun or Sandboxx to learn what is actually happening.
😂😂😂
That siren noise is the most erie noise ever. That shit is legit scary. Gives me chills
It's the same siren for tornadoes down here....hair raising...
It makes me physically ill even thinking about that siren
Hope you hear it 😂
Ukrainians hearing it every day
99% sure it's from the game DEFCON. Global thermonuclear war arcade simulator.
This is absolutely insane to even imagine, I pray this never happens
You have to play part of it not happening. Politicians weaponize your lack of information and participation in democracy but keeping you busy and misinforming you.
The first rule of nuclear war, nobody wins a nuclear war.
Not true. We won that one against Japan in the 40s. Nukes were used, ergo, that war went nuclear.
I believe you meant peer nuclear war
*Skynet* has entered the chat:
@@mygirlfriendsbootyphat I don't even think he's crazy enough to start a nuclear war, he'll bluster but I don't think he would. Now Prigozhin just might.
@@mygirlfriendsbootyphat if he truly didn't give a fuck he would've started using nuclear artillery already
Misanthropes: lol k
Not nuclear missiles. It's "special military projectiles."
😂😂😂
Jesus 😂😂😂
Its not an illegal invasion its operation Ukrani freedom 😂
That's funny.....Lets see how funny it is when one hits your hometown of Detroit?
😂😂😂
Interesting to note that when you look at the Russian bases they are mostly very close to borders with other countries, mostly China. Any attack on them would look very much like an attack on the adjoining country.
had the same thought! at first i was just looking out for how screwed my german ass would be but yeah they really stationed these in a way that would cause major conflicts with pretty much everyone lol
У нас вся страна - одна большая децентрализованная военная база с массой приколов - вам кажется.
@@projectadmin5979 Тем не менее, Россия была вынуждена стоять на месте страной, незначительной по размеру, используя 50-летние западные технологии и чистое мужество. Тем временем их мирные жители мерзнут в своих домах, потому что нет денег на содержание базовой инфраструктуры, в то время как жители Кремля живут в роскоши.
@@StephenBoothUK Insignificant? Ukraine is 2.5 times larger than Great Britain, NATO countries help it with everything it needs, but about heating you are very mistaken, the Soviet Union built an excellent heating infrastructure that still works, I have to open the windows in winter because sometimes it’s too hot, but I pay $40 a month for heating
The bases are located not far from the railways, which stretch along the borders, in order to transport the army and supplies to the border of the country with which you are fighting as quickly as possible, and even this looks nearby on the map, but in reality it is thousands of kilometers
Makes nukes. Shoots at innocent uninvolved civilians. Hides in bunkers… evil and cowardice.
The scariest part of it all is that every leader in charge of the warheads knows they will have a safe place to go indefinitely if nuclear war breaks out.
Idk, they’d be stuck in a bunker with limited food and everything, and if they ever even could come out, the world is destroyed and there is nowhere to go. It’s not so bad, that’s much worse than death, especially for people who live to lord over others from luxury.
Nah, Sagan proved nuclear winter for 10 years after would kill us all. That's when the US and USSR started treaties that drastically reduced the obscene numbers of nukes both sides had.
@@elessartelcontar9415 He didn't prove anything.
@@elessartelcontar9415Absolutely no way 2 superpowers would make policy decisions that massive based on the assessment of 1 man.
Can anyone please tell me how any country has ever won a war.
It's totally impossible.
I don't think people realize the amount of time and skill it probably took just to make and edit the visual and graphic part of this edit. Well done!
Who gives a shit???
What program or application is used to create the missile trajectories and animations? I really like for some reason the syncing is really satisfying lol
Nookalurr war he said
I think that's the whole reason they are here. But good job seeming special or observant, giving credit where other comments wouldn't have 😮
Unfortunately there will be a response regardless. What would be remaining is questionable at best!
I keep remembering a line from a movie: "It's NU-CLEAR!"
This is a very well done explanation. Good job, and thank you.
My personal favorite (that I have fond memories of seeing on tv on a late night movie in July of 1976):
Major T. J. Kong, Commander of the B-52 Leper Colony:
“Well, boys, I reckon this is it. New-q-lure combat, toe-to-toe with the Rooskies.”
"...in terms of disadvantages: there simply are none"
I love how we actually think the government lets us know how many missiles we have
Right? And where they are ...
There's no reason to hide this man. The whole point of having nuclear weapons is deterrence, so it's best to loudly advertise what we have in this area, unlike with most other military assets and programs.
Yep, but they won’t fess up about their knowledge of UFOs
@@maynardburgeryes and counties like Russia are more likely to exaggerate quantity and yield.
Yeah they probably exaggerate if anything
“I know not what weapons ww3 will be fought with, but ww4 will be fought with sticks and stones” - Albert Einstein
When did stein made that speech🤔
@@user-td9mn4rm9yit wasn’t in a speech but in an interview he had in 1949
In that case, WW4 would most likely not be a war, but small groups of people in a Dystopian society fighting over limited resources. Now that is scary. I'd live in the woods trapping animals & fish. Assuming animals are still alive if some humans survive.
I will survive to austrilia middle desert the most safest country@@pete5819 during war
Call of duty ❤
There are submarines right now with the pure total power of WWII roaming around.
Would love to see more videos like this.. Thanks!
A full scale nuclear exchange between all the major powers would basically send us back to the Dark Ages for a time.
It would send EVERYTHING back to the dark ages for a time.
dark ages? lol how about extinction. people tend to forget that the nuclear fallout will render large swaths of the earth uninhabitable outside of just russia and the usa. + it would cause a nuclear winter which willplunge the earth into darkness causing complete extinction of many plant and animal species worldwide including loss of food crops everywhere, the remainder of the planet that wasnt hit by nukes would slowly starve and suffer radiation. It would make the fallout games look tame. Huamity would be lucky it survived, or unlucky. The suffering pain etc of surviving a nuke is hell itself if you knew one was coming its better to go outside to ground zero where you expect it to hit, relax crack open a beer and wait
Depends on which nations were hit. It’s possible some countries will not be affected
@@opticfloyyydI don't think you understand how the global economy works. Every country on the planet would be massively affected by a global nuclear war on this premise alone.
And that's not considering the environmental implications. It's likely that the entire planet would become uninhabitable, including everywhere that wasn't immediately affected by the weaponry.
There's no guarantee that life would survive on the planet at any significant scale. Humanity could become entirely extinct.
All over human greed and confident stupidity. I say pull the trigger before we leave the planet. Humanity in its current form is a cancer.
@@opticfloyyyd You know, hazards of THIS SCALE could cover the whole world... (because of wind, ocean and animal spreading)
"Ending millions of lives with the push of a button is typically frowned upon"
Yeah i would say so.
Billions
"A death or a dozen deaths are tragedies, a million deaths is just a statistic." - Josef Stalin
You've got to remember that the USSR had 30,000,000 deaths in WWII and he was OK with it as long as he got the end game he wanted, and, he did.
Seems rather haram
We could argue that the world leaders are at the same level of god, since they have the possibility to decide if humanity must extinguish or not.
Therefore Biden is a god for us humans😃.
P.S i strongly believe that in the year 2080 our civilization will cease to exist.
Don't kid yourself, ALL those psychos in power, from everywhere, past and present in reality have little to no regard for human life
I like the way he says “nookala”
Makes a subject like this much more digestible
"A strange game, the only winning move is not to play"
-first strike
The operators will never get cold feet. They execute the launch procedure every day - always with incorrect codes, so the missiles never fire. It's a daily drill. When the time comes, they'll never know that it's different than any other procedure until it's too late.
Unless.. they’ve already done their drill for the day and they get the sirens again just hours later.
@@darthsilversith667 it's several times a day
So cool if its true
Whats ur source?
@@manzellfake expert
Having watched a nuclear war simulation in the command post of the local Air Base, many years ago. I realized that it would be impossible to get far enough away from the base to survive. I decided I’d just twist up a big fatty and go see what I trained for in elementary and middle school. It won’t last long enough to register in my brain before it’s over.
Even on a dirt bike.
Puff puff pass
@@DustDevilRageno pass id face my last solo
READ REVELATION IN THE HOLY SCRIPTURES. IT WILL TELL YOU ABOUT TOTAL DEVASTATION WORLDWIDE! THE RETURN JESUS CHRIST IS IMMINENT! AMEN. PERIOD!
Remember to get under the desk lol
"In the nuclear age the true enemy is war itself." Denzel Washington in Crimson Tide.
"A single inescapable fact -- that mankind united with infinitely greater purpose in pursuit of war than he ever did in pursuit of peace." Equilibrium
Really enjoyed the sound effects with headphones on 👍🏼
Haha
Don't forget the moles on both sides. Chance of a surprise attack is next to zero. Also each superpowers have backup of backup of backup plans. So, it's highly unlikely that all of their arsenals would be destroyed in a surprise attack no matter how well coordinated that attack might be.
There will be no winners - mankind will have been destroyed for low motives of pretentious powerful minorities on highest technical level.
Already after 5 hours of nuclear war the total death rate of the 6 years lasting 2nd world war will be exceeded (over 60.000.000 dead)
- in the mutually assured annihilation there will be no major city with infrastructure on either side,
the survivors will be wandering in a civilization desert without electricity and communication networks in the following nuclear winter
realizing the irreversible extinction of their own species and civilization
and envy the dead ...
And mind you - this change by a nuclear war is not one of years, but of a few weeks.
What is to be expected, I suppose, from an "intelligent" species that has taken from powerful minorities
as an apparently reasonable price for the assertion of competing claims to power
by means of the ready kept and well-behaved modernized nuclear arsenals of mass destruction
with irreversible extinction in a nuclear holocaust and the following nuclear winter ?
This is the comments I was looking for ❤
@@hotchocexpresso
Winter. Nuclear Winter 🤣
Yeah, also I'm surprised he didn't mention Russia's nuclear Deadhand system designed to release every single nuclear weapon towards the attacker in the case everyone in Russia is dead.
Absolutely nobody expects the ability to take out ALL nuclear capabilities of enemy. The point would simply to minimize them as much as possible in order to 'win' and not also suicide yourself completely.
Basically, mutual destruction with the land inhabitable even if you do survive. The crazy part is, we keep threatening each other knowing there would be mass destruction.
in russia working at best 5% of missiles (submarines), in china 15%. These monkeys lost for easy
*Humans!*
Просто политическая элита одной страны так сильно хочет доминировать во всём мире, что ради этой идеи готова уничтожить всё человечество.
@@aaz1992politicians* no sane person wants this shit
M. A. D.
The assumption is that the Russians will sit back and watch the American missiles come.
Russians don't have the technology to stop US nukes at Mach 10, US has some but it probably won't intercept most of it given the speed
Dude killed it with the visuals
I loved the visuals. The sound too. That sub launched attack on Russian cities with the siren noise was terrifying!
7:28 this simple ilustration was incredibly scary and really puts into perspective how fast we can destroy ourselves
It's USSR nuking Baltics and Ukraine, their own members. Watch less of this crap 😂
@@KTO_HUBLOTit’s based on old estimates but it’s not like Russia would shy away from nuking Ukraine in an all out war today, I think that’s been made clear by their attitude towards it in recent years
Keep in mind the UK is 2.5x smaller than Texas, so.
@@KTO_HUBLOTIt literally says at the bottom of the screen when the nukes hit the Baltics “United States”
Yeah it's like "Poof -Kiss Yer Ass G'd Bye!"
So what it boils down to is, if there is a large scale nuclear war, we're pretty much screwed.
Maybe if u live in some remote part of the world u wil be ok for sometime..till the nuclear winds get u
Only western countries are screwed. Rest of the world including Asia, South America and Australia will live on
We”ll all be dead
@@whatroads4x4well where is remote enough?
@@AwakenedAvocado parts of africa, canadian tundra, andes moutains, gobi desert, iceland, greenland, parts of australia.
So good on a paper but in reality we might be all dead...
Wanna see a scary movie? Watch an old one with Hank Fonda called Fail Safe. Here's what we face.
Man this series is a scary rollercoaster of emotions and thoughts😅 thanks for the hard work it’s very informative and entertaining but at the same time helps to get perspective on how much of a nightmare we are headed if we are not careful. The siren 🚨 sounds are epic and scary 😂
In other words the end
Facts this is chilling🥶🫣
@@parishlarry21 the end
When you take your headphones off to ensure the sirens are not real...
One of the sounds are from the SCP foundation game in Roblox
and you also forgot to include Russia's failsafe in the event of a nuclear attack on Russia. in an attack on russia, russia will automatically respond by sending weapons back and if the enemy had managed to hit strategic targets in russia, the deadhand would have been activated and it would have resulted in all active nuclear weapons being sent to pre-programmed targets. mutual assured destruction
in russia working at best 5% of missiles (submarines), in china 15%. These monkeys lost for easy
Do you mean this? and I can only imagine how the system works to be honest.
Fail-deadly is a concept in nuclear military strategy that encourages deterrence by guaranteeing an immediate, automatic, and overwhelming response to an attack, even if there is no one to trigger such retaliation. The term fail-deadly was coined as a contrast to fail-safe.
this was beautiful presented
Plot twist: All nukes are actually a deterrent for alien species, and we never actually had any plans to use them on ourselves
Honestly, I could see aliens being totally blindsided by nukes because they never developed such "barbaric" weaponry after realizing what it could mean for their species as a whole
Except we already did, twice.
@@warmtoast1408 minor details
Инопланетяне под пиво и рыбу смотрят сериал и делают ставки на то в каком веке человечество уничтожит себя.
"War does not determine who is right - only who is left."
- B.Russell
The nuclear arsenals of mass destruction, which are still not eliminated in spite of the UN charter, but well maintained and modernized and capable of multiple overkill, with whose deterrence powerful minorities may assert territorial claims to power and thereby put the entire human species and civilization at risk, although after an intentionally or unintentionally triggered nuclear war no more inhabitable territories remain in the following nuclear winter (which indicates an intelligence deficit bordering on mental derangement...)
need - in contrast to the heavily thematized climate change - with escalating nuclear war only a few days for the irreversible extinction of the human species and civilization - already after 5 hours the entire death rate of the 6 years long raging 2nd world war (thus 60.000.000 dead) would be exceeded .
That on Monday, the 26th September 1983 this irreversible downfall was prevented by the refusal of a firing order of the lieutenant colonel Stanislaw Petrow, who was on duty by proxy, which took place on wrongly interpreted observation data, is communicated remarkably just as little of the consequence of this decision appropriately for the public as the nuclear self-destruction capacity which is to be measured permanently ready after few days...
What is to be thought of an "intelligent" species which accepts to be completely threatened with irreversible extinction by powerful minorities for the enforcement of competing power systems, and which invests so much money and technical know-how in the provision and maintenance of its own destruction ?
For perspective the Atomic weapon dropped on Hiroshima was 16kt and the one on Nagasaki was 21kt. 300kt -800kt nukes is apocalyptic type destruction terrifying weapons.
So it’s proof American politicians are the only crazy people enough to think nuclear war can be won .
now there are megatons
Yep, and there are even megaton ones now. Ridiculous man
It should be 2000 Mega tons for Russia
@@MikesGarageReviews...... There is no such thing. Biggest ever was 100 Megaton Tsar bomba from Russia. Stop making stuff up.
The worst part of these conflicts is having to hear the "word" nukuler over and over.
It's so easy to practice vocal articulation and yet ... "summarines"
Came to say this. Made it hard to stay focused...
nukuhler, summarines and subbarines. I just can’t do it lol
Fucking agree hard
Ive never realized the scale of a nuclear war , only data of potential targets , weapons used...but boy o boy , putting it all together with ALL the targets and ALL the weapons-is truly terrifying. Its like there would be not much left of either country-then factor in the other countries that could participate...wow
Америке хватит 10 ракет, России с её площадью 20 ракет, повезёт тому кто сразу умрёт остальные умрут от голода и радиации, будет всё заражено.
The real question you missed is, how long would it take Joe Biden to find the launch codes?
Damn, the effort put into this series is exemplary. Excellent additional info and animations. Keep it up. Cant wait for the next.
lmao
cartoons are real life
Yea, except he makes it look like Russia is all the way off the east coast of America when, in all actuality, Russia is off the coast of Alaska. 😂
He doesn’t know geographically where North Dakota and Montana are. And it’s “Nu-Clear” not “New-Q-Lur”
Minot AFB is to the east of Malmstrom AFM, not the other way around.
The scariest thing about nuclear war isn't how destructive the weapons are. Its how little time you have to say goodbye to loved ones 💔
That's just stupid
What loved ones ?
Emotional
Yeah 15 minutes so better have a good bug out bag lols what a joke gimmick....
You've had almost 2 years
Thank you for sharing this information to our enemies. I can’t wait
Have you ever seen the videos or interviews of regular bomber crews watching their payloads hit? Its devastating. No one wins in this one. Its a hard job. I was air force as a maintainer. I appreciate those guys. Its not easy.. maybe when its insurgents you know wouldnt think twice, but bombs on workers and geound crew is a rough one.
To quote War Games, "The only winning move is not to play".
Though nuclear war is the only game you can lose even if you don't play, thanks to the incoming nuclear winter.
This was scarier then a lot of horror movies
Than*
@@wcbranitly0692 no! I have no respect for this English k
Fiction needs to sound plausible, however reality has no such restrictions.
than*
I want the next part of the series so badly!
If there’s going to be a nuclear war I’m glad that A: I’m an old man and B: I live a millisecond away from a major military installation.
Might not be the best thing
@@owenbradford9746 option one: die instantly and painlessly
Option two: live in a nuclear destroyed planet. Absolute chaos, barely any livable resources, radiation everywhere, people who are left fight each other for survival over the smallest things you take for granted today.
I’ll take option one.
@@seanmg-_-1138from what I’ve heard it would be the northern hemisphere that would deal with the nuclear fallout. Southern wouldn’t be too bad. So if you can get down south you might be able to live okay. That’s just what I’ve heard but idk.
@@drinkswatere i live in the south hemisphere and i dont want this shitshow!!
Option B isn’t even that good
Imagine if humans were actually focused on peace.
Imagine if we focused on nuclear power production as hard as we have nuclear weapon production. We would have achieved nuclear fusion power by now.
Quit saying this, the US is trying to get peace but other nations want to take control under their ruling n ideology’s, n The other countries just wants to nuke the US in general 👁️👄👁️
Nato is the closest thing we have for peace!, haven’t seen Europe in war for 75 years until “Russians” decided to rule a “special military operation” which is basically their invading phrase
If the US never conducted a special military operation Mexico while the cartels are destroying our country with drug smuggling the US doesn’t even want War, we need the force to keep us safe from invaders
@@nicholaslennon it's already there since December 2022
There's no chance that the US or Russia would engage in a nuclear war due to the harmful impact it would have on people and the environment. Despite possessing thousands of nuclear weapons, they could only safely use a small portion of them. This is because nuclear blasts would lead to a drop in global temperature, caused by burning cities and soot blocking sunlight. This would result in food shortages and a severely damaged atmosphere. In the event of multiple nuclear strikes, cities would burn, and the resulting smoke would block sunlight for decades, leading to worldwide food shortages and starvation.
While traditional agriculture heavily relies on sunlight for photosynthesis, there are alternative methods for food production that do not require direct sunlight. Indoor farming techniques such as hydroponics, aquaponics, and vertical farming can be implemented in controlled environments like underground bunkers or buildings with artificial lighting. These methods allow for the cultivation of various crops without relying on natural sunlight. Additionally, efforts to develop lab-grown or synthetic food products are ongoing, which could provide alternative sources of nutrition in post-nuclear scenarios.
Holy shit, you have very accurate information!
As someone who grew up during the cold war many of the comments are terrifying. When I was young no one ever said a nuclear war might be a positive thing, ever. We had respect for the tragedy that would be.We put value in life. All life including human. No one who had any love of this planet and the life on it ever suggested the world would be better off after a nuclear war, no one. What is in the minds of today's youth that they would conclude a nuclear war would reduce the human population therefore the Earth would be better off? If the Earth would fare better with fewer people then maybe it's these homicidal sociopaths who should leave first.
I mean the world would be better off with less people. But not caused in a situation like this that’s just nuts. Maybe by limiting the number of children you can have. The planet is way overpopulated and it’s still growing. What’s gonna happen when we bleed this planet and it’s resources dry? Something is gonna happen eventually that’s going to be devastating to humanity either caused by us or by our lack of change/actions we didn’t take.
Birth rates in the US have been in massive decline since the 70’s. Many countries including the US are at a negative birth rate. Last I looked the US is right below 2 births per woman.
China is under extreme pressure because of their old birth policy. Last I checked They were at a 3 child policy because their replacement rates were not sustainable.
These are just two examples of many. It’s a common misunderstanding that is repeated.
Actually the modern era of nuclear weapons technology and application is a lot less destructive in the long term with regards to fall out.
The powers the be have spent a lot of time and money figuring out ways to make a nuclear war " do-able".
Unfortunately.
Cope boomer
Come on lets have a cook-off Sodom versus the Eastern Kingdoms
I've never been so terrified of KSP b-roll
I see sr2/jno
Literally, Oppenheimer's quote comes to life
_"Now I am become Death, the destroyer of worlds.”_
I think we would win a "nukyalur war" but nobody wins a "nuclear war"
google the dead hand system, the whole US would be a giant crater before the first missile hits russia lol
@@barrysilvertone2896Pretty sure the system works by using different systems to determine whether there was a nuclear attack which depends on the detonations occuring first before it can make the order to retaliate. A kind of back up Incase the government gets taken out before a response can be ordered. That's just what I heard though, I don't work in the Kremlin.
You just combined the last three videos, which granted are great, but that "To Be Continued" part about an attack on the US, we're jonesing for it lol.
Russian channel, account and building are registered to FSB in Moscow
@@borghorsa1902 Yeah so what ... We still want to see it.
@@borghorsa1902proof?
It doesn’t matter….. The Russian hardware is so flawed and poorly maintained, most of their nuclear devices will detonate in their own country……
@@borghorsa1902 Seeing as youtube accounts aren't registered to locations at all, I'm really curious how you know that this account is registered to the FSB in Moscow.
You should have shown all of the attacks back to back, or as you would believe they would happen, all together at the end to really show the scale of what the entire attack would be like.
he does around 5 minutes
Can we get the source of the soundtrack? Looking for the track at 16:00.
Following - I would like the info too
thanks well done
Overwhelmingly and sadly sickening. That we can end life just like that. This is horrifying. Murder to it's fullest. It actually made me cry for any nation.
War has been around since the dawn of man, death hasn’t changed
@@jaygatsby5013nah really wow. It’s still disgusting.
Correct you cant just do it like that russians would retaliate and we would get exact same thing.
The clowns and freaks in charge love this stuff
Its daunting to imagine that a large chunk of the worlds population could be gone within an hour of the first launch 😮
That is why it is believed that ww3 would last at minimum an hour as all nuclear powers glassed each other.
😦
@@voodoovince8001minimum an hour or maximum? Serious question lol
Чувак, 300 млн это не половина населения 🤣
It’s scary but perhaps this is the worlds way of population control. It knows our flaws will lead us to eventually wiping out virtually all of ourselves and after nuclear winter, the earth will start anew. ???? Just a thought. 😂
i only feel sorry for all the innocent animals and plants that would go extinct
....not so much for humanity, who doesnt deserve to live on this beautiful planet!
The fact is that results like this would be in Hollywood movies. 😂
The production here is just incredible. Bravo!
My quota of how many times I hear "Nucular" in a day has been exceeded.
Knowledge is power.
And power is having enough knowledge to know that you will never have enough power.
Poe Baron
Please release part 2 😢 🙏
You did a phenomenal job with this sir. Well done!
This has to be one of the best videos I have ever seen! Not to mention it’s also one of the most informative! This is great! I can’t wait for part 2!
They left off the part about America having civil war 2
@@frankp7411Russians would still retaliate nuking the hell outta the US. The civil war in what was once America happens in the Mad Max era to follow for mainly food, drinkable water, and women 😅
@@MM-tw7pu perhaps if America's satanic leaders in Washington hit the button before losing control, but otherwise Russia would likely be close allies and supporters of the rebels, even if that did happen
@@frankp7411what?
Part 2 is the death of the world
And I’ll never forget it. I see one of those submarines on first Avenue by the FDR.
This all assumes that satalights wouldn't be knocked out first and all of these guidance systems would still work. Noone truely knows what the other happens to have until its too late.
Missiles use inertial guidence, not GPS.
39:00 You mixed up Bulgaria and Hungary. Early on you also mixed up the locations of North Dakota and Montana. Minor issues. Excellent work though.
That’s the indication of this presentation is prepared by Chinese. Go figure!
Amazing depth and breadth of information- my new favorite channel!
18:43-19:05 Listened to this part on repeat countless times.
Wouldn't a disadvantage of the subs be that it's easier to disrupt communication with them?
there is NO winner in an exchange of weapons like this. life on planet would end.
The amount of information. And the delivery. Amazing. Well done. Excellent content.
Nuke-u-lar
To much info they need to shut up
Yeah helping the enemy. You people are weird
@@tyantisamuels9461 my thoughts exactly 💯
@@stevensowards8077 You think this person who found all this info about nukes online has more info then our adversaries who have the same internet access and a lot of other resources?
Where is part 2
Ever wonder why they put all those silo's through the plains as opposed to northern Alaska? Wouldn't it be a much shorter distance to travel, and make the first-strike target area well outside the continental heartland? This would also be a lot less missiles to try to sort out-intercept as they head toward military bases and population centers as well, should it elevate to that point.
This should be required viewing for anyone going into politics or the military
Watched a few videos breaking down a nuclear exchange. None mentioned what kind of cyber warfare would take place to slow down or cut off early warnings or alerts. Wonder if in such a situation there’s even time to engage in anything like that.
The United States military has satellites that have the capability to neutralize both ICBMs and enemy satellites.
Why destroy enemy satellites, satellites is what guides ICBMs. Secondly, when the "Star Wars" program was proposed. America has satellites with nuclear payloads. When any of our enemies launches a ICBM at us, our satellites will incept incoming ICBMs in high Earth orbit.
The United States currently has 3400 satellites orbiting earth.
China comes in second with 550 and Russia only has 170.
@@whitehorse4318 space will be extinguished first
@@1968.5 I totally agree with you. Then what will guide your missiles?
@@whitehorse4318 well, we've already seen it. Who are you listening to? Now there are too many experts. What he didn't mention about early warning stations. They see over 6000 km. The United States will not be able to shoot and forget.
Russia has a contengiceny for that called dead hand, that in the case it was destroyed its nuclear weapons would auto deploy. Its a kill switch if russian command doesnt not respond to this system x amount of times per day it will start a launch
It's time to move to live in Australia, grabbing a chair and popcorn waiting till the show getting started
By not having one...when it comes down to it nobody wins, just a bunch people that have never met each other nor even have a problem with, killing each other because their government tells em too, sad part is that if we met alot of the people off the battle field, we'd probably get along just fine...Afghanistan and WW1 and 2 were about some of the only justifiable wars but even then, there really was no winners,
The music, the braaaa, the drama, the flamboyant yet apocalyptic voice over… perfection.
I feel like if you showed this to a top general during the Cold War the would imprison you for espionage
How can I know that the orders I receive to launch my missiles came from a sane president?
- Major Harold L Hering USAF
Love the random clips of Kerbal Space Program
Sub'd great explanation
Imagine trying to organise this madness within the hour or so of it taking place, even with decades of planning it would be a giant shitshow of disorganised panic. The worst day in history.
I wouldn't know whether or not nuclear missiles are kept there, but I live about 45 minutes West of Whiteman Air Force Base outside Warrensburg, MO. That's where the majority of the stealth bombers are kept. I work in Warrensburg and if you pay attention you'll see the stealths flying around the area almost every day. Could only imagine how many were mistaken as UFOs till they became public knowledge...
i believe it was machiavelli in the prince who said that democracies always have better weapons because of the free market incentive and enforceable contracts to produce stuff that actually works
this must have been hard work,good job dude👍👍👍👍
At 8:15, it's public knowledge that the Trident II carries up to 14 warheads each. Usually only 10 per treaty, and 4 decoys, with up to 24 missiles per ship.
That's 240 warheads per ship, and 14 submarines, providing a total of up to 3,360 MIRV's in the fleet.
I thought we stopped using MIRVs on our submarine based missiles. I might not be remembering that right tho
@joshuaortiz2031 yes! Of course! We don't have any MIRVs in our submarines -wink wink
@@Ricardo-kh7fb that makes a lot more sense
I was thinking the same thing.
And the Moon is made of cheese. Green cheese at that.
I have a feeling this information might be old. I can’t imagine our military leaking precise US nuclear sites so easily. We must have bigger and badder things in place.
800+ kps NEFP weapons coming in from high orbit.
We are an open society with a free press; this information is not classified, google 'nuclear posture review 2023', you'll see every single bit of info down to the last detail.
It doesn't need to be secret; in fact it's better that others know, that way there's no, "oops, I didn't know they had those weapons, I'd have never tried to attack if I knew that."
As long as the sites are protected and the systems continuously tested for reliability, it's not a problem.
That's the wonder of Mutually Assured Destruction. They know where our nukes are. We know where theirs' are. We both know what they can do.
@@brandonbowerstx if only these were real lol
Your military industrial complex is a laundering scheme for decades now, honey
Your split of one MIRV Bus is far too generous. A Trident can’t drop its MIRVs over an area as wide as some of your depictions show.
Staggering to think these weapons have been with us for 79 years.