If you want to see more videos like this, buy my cables: bit.ly/3UigLqj And if you don't want to see any more videos like this, buy my cables: bit.ly/3UigLqj 🤓🟣🔌
If their personalities stop 20 times between them, especially when they are sitting so close to one another, then the personalities aren’t that dynamic, are they?
Wow, so the R100 must be the re-used guts of the old Canon M50 (EF-M). Same issues, huge crop, loss of dual-pixel autofocus, and awful rolling shutter in 4k, but pretty good as a 1080 camera.
Canon always has refurb r100's that always go for super cheap. I picked one up for fun at only $249 (US) for the body and it's hilariously capable for what it is. I also have been shooting Canon digital since the d60 came out so my expectations for cameras probably is based on how far we've come from since back then. Something I've really been happy with the r100 is it's just a really fun timelapse camera. Just get a EF 10-18 and a cheap ef>rf converter if you don't already have one and you can get some killer 4k30fps timelapse video that looks amazing. I even picked up a LP-E17 battery adapter to USB-C and connect straight to a vmount to get past the horrible battery life issues the LP-E17 has.
I like both of your channels individually but I just love your colabs. Funny but still informative. More of these please! You have a very good, fluent and catchy conversation going on.
The R100 may not be very competitive in the video department - but for photo, it is great bang for buck. A very good entry level mirrorless system camera as far as photo quality goes. The big negative though is the lack of an articulated screen.
Welcome to the Laurel and Hardy of RUclips. What a great collab team. Ya know, if I didn't already have the Osmo Pocket 3, I would have considered the R100 for my RUclips videos. On B&H you can get the kit lens and the 55-210mm lens for just $100 more.
The Sony ZVE10 is still the best value camera in the Sony line up for $600... with a Yongnuo 16mm f1.8 and a Rode video micro II ... And you have a great studio set up under a $1000. Now of course we didn't talk about lighting, but you can be creative with natural light and reflectors, if you are on a low budget.
Holy heck, I didn't realize that Gerald was based in London, Ontario! I am from London too and purchased my Canon R8 from the same Camera Canada location 👍. Another great collab with Mark as well!
You can find a used GH5 or G9 for around 500-600 bucks, I just got a G9 and the V-Log upgrade, so it can shot 4k 10bit 4:2:2 in V-Log. Not bad for 500 bucks.
I really like my EOS R100. I bought it originally for a school project and because I wanted something cheap-ish to be able to take photos with. It fits my use case well, and I think I'll keep using it as my daily driver.
Great job on the video folks! Thanks for making it. I sell those cables all the time. I expect to hear a version of the opening jingle to be "Giraffe Undone... He's crazy!"
The AGFA photo sounds like "egg for photo". Let's see how accurate that is... also: a SELFIE screen?? That is... unique. Somehow I thought a flip-out screen would be the cheaper way of accomplishing that.
IMO more money into the camera than into the studio build up - this way you always have a better image to play with irrespective of the location. The R100 was surprising bad btw, and Agfa had good audio out of a box for a cam with no ports. In fact Agfa had a good vibe for a comedy channel 😄 Good to see You Two in the same vid! (I shortened the word "video" by whole two letters and then explained what I did in the brackets). I hope you guys will keep it up. Cheers! 👍
Jordan from Petapixel would have been a great candidate for this format as well. Also I think, that he can ve roasted for his bag Peter-Lindgren-style.
As someone who both films their own videos and watches youtube, im 100% fine with high bitrate 1080p. On a computer it looks the same as youtubes compressed 4k anyway and it saves me money, its exactly why i havent moved away from my 200d yet. Might get some improvement but not enough to dump 1-2k to replace a camera thats already good enough.
Honestly I'm kinda shocked how bad the Canon performed. At that price point I would have expected A LOT more. Yes it's "cheap" for a "real camera", but it's 600 bucks none the less and with Gerald's studio lighting even a mid-range phone camera would deliver adequate images. And the difference to other cameras that are just slightly more expensive or are a few generations old is MASSIVE. You can easily get a used Sony a7 Mk2 or something of the a6000 line for that price and those cameras run circles around the R100 when it comes to image quality.
Omg, in addition to my fx3, a7cii, etc... I have that underwater pentax point and shoot.... stupid thing works good enough for it to go to one of the kids.... until I got my go pro's, it was my only underwater rated camera. If memory serves correct, we've had it for almost 10 years now. Hard to rotate out.
Well, the conclusion could have been Mark's ZV-E10 moment. :D I can't really understand what Canon does with its stuff, it was the same with the M50 Mk 2. In my country, the R100 is 450€ and the ZV-E10 (Mk 1) is about 620€, a new full frame A7 II is 720€. What Canon does with these cheaper cameras and their 4K abilities is just ridiculous because they advertised this R100 as an entry level camera, aiming at people coming from a smartphone. I highly doubt that people used to a smartphone will have any fun with this device because it doesn't even hold up to the standards of a modern smartphone. Smartphone shooters are hybrid shooters, so you can't leave video capabilities completely out if you are not coming up with any other major benefit. Doing selfies without a flippy screen isn't easy, too, I'd assume. I hope Canon's CEO gets one of these on his next anniversary or whatever, he will have the nightmares of his life. :D
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't you get pretty good results with a GoPro Hero 11 ? It's $300 new. But I reckon you could find one for around $200 if you search.
Now you need to get Kasey from Camera Conspiracies and do a slow motion running-across-the-street vlogging test. Kasey could train you on proper slow motion running technique, while also suggesting an all fruit-based diet. That last part will not be relevant to the camera test but will serve as the dramatic character arc for the story.
You probably could use the OG ZV-1 with great lighting and a mic for talking head. Not sure about THAT Canon camera… I still have a T3i that looks decent for 1080P
I have the agfa DC 8200 as a cheap photo camera as well as its cheaper brother DC 5500 For when i don't want anything with a power zoom but when i am a bit more serious but still budget i have a Kodak AZ 425
Hi Gerald. Please can you make us a video on video quality of Canon R5ii.. there are guys claiming that it looks soft compared to R8 axept the 8K raw files but that is huge and put a lot of strain on edeting system.
ffinally, wanted you guys to collab forever, do you like r100 vs zv1 ii as my first camera for photo, every says zv1 ii is bad for photo, do you agree?
@@imfosher for ultimate compactness - the ZV1ii is a good choice. The photos are still good, but the image quality will be better on a a6100 with a sigma 18-50 or canon r100 with sigma 18-50. Those would be my picks. They will be bigger and heavier and not completely pocketable.
You want a cheap camera showdown.. go buy 5 of the cheap cameras from TEMU.. now that’s a challenge.. part 2 you buy 5 of the action cam/go pro knock offs and see how well the Chinese have done copying it..
as far as i remember its better to spend a little more for r50 and get it as a first camera, rather than r100 more features, for a little bit more money
If you want to see more videos like this, buy my cables: bit.ly/3UigLqj
And if you don't want to see any more videos like this, buy my cables: bit.ly/3UigLqj
🤓🟣🔌
If i’m indifferent, do I still have to buy your cables ;)
Deffo do more of these collabs 👍😁
4K is overkill for video, I never watch your videos at more than 720p !
I don't remember any of this.
That is what the GHB does
LOL!!
You've been Undone.
But we remember you Mark. Always will
You are a treasure
"I'm Gerald Undone and I have over 20 stops of dynamic personality"
What about at a sigma to mog ratio of 2 🤔
But how many clean stops?
@@ElmerLa I think we can all agree Gerald has over 20 clean stops. Lol
gold
If their personalities stop 20 times between them, especially when they are sitting so close to one another, then the personalities aren’t that dynamic, are they?
Wow, so the R100 must be the re-used guts of the old Canon M50 (EF-M). Same issues, huge crop, loss of dual-pixel autofocus, and awful rolling shutter in 4k, but pretty good as a 1080 camera.
Hows your health Mark. TC
I'd pay good money to see pixels dueling it out.
@@hari_fyi I'm still alive, it's better than it was. Thanks for asking.
Yes it also has the Digic 8 instead of the Digic X. Pretty much a downgraded M50 but with an RF mount.
Overall, it worse than even the M200, lol. How the hell they make it no touchscreen in 2024. EOS M got it since 2013 or smth.
That was nice of Mark, to boost Gerald’s ratings
I was fully expecting a Xyla test on these cameras, lol
I'd honestly love to see the Agfa put through its (admittedly shitty) paces.
Canon always has refurb r100's that always go for super cheap. I picked one up for fun at only $249 (US) for the body and it's hilariously capable for what it is. I also have been shooting Canon digital since the d60 came out so my expectations for cameras probably is based on how far we've come from since back then. Something I've really been happy with the r100 is it's just a really fun timelapse camera. Just get a EF 10-18 and a cheap ef>rf converter if you don't already have one and you can get some killer 4k30fps timelapse video that looks amazing. I even picked up a LP-E17 battery adapter to USB-C and connect straight to a vmount to get past the horrible battery life issues the LP-E17 has.
W
Best Value imo is probably a used a6000 for 200-300 bucks and a used small zoom or even the kit-lens
Big FAXXXXX
even if you have a thousand bucks, just bumps that to A6000 and a really good glass like the sigma 18-35 f/1.8
I wish Sony still made em small, my NEX-6 is the perfect size and weight for mirrorless and was still fully featured.
The build quality is crap tho
@@benja1378 who cares if it's a budget option?
I like both of your channels individually but I just love your colabs. Funny but still informative. More of these please! You have a very good, fluent and catchy conversation going on.
The R100 may not be very competitive in the video department - but for photo, it is great bang for buck. A very good entry level mirrorless system camera as far as photo quality goes. The big negative though is the lack of an articulated screen.
I picked one up for $299 and did a fashion shoot with it and the RF 50 f/1.2 Shots came out great
Welcome to the Laurel and Hardy of RUclips.
What a great collab team. Ya know, if I didn't already have the Osmo Pocket 3, I would have considered the R100 for my RUclips videos. On B&H you can get the kit lens and the 55-210mm lens for just $100 more.
damn, canon has soooo good colors... even its a low end camera
The Sony ZVE10 is still the best value camera in the Sony line up for $600... with a Yongnuo 16mm f1.8 and a Rode video micro II ... And you have a great studio set up under a $1000. Now of course we didn't talk about lighting, but you can be creative with natural light and reflectors, if you are on a low budget.
9:30 I really hope McKinnon is catching this.
Holy heck, I didn't realize that Gerald was based in London, Ontario! I am from London too and purchased my Canon R8 from the same Camera Canada location 👍. Another great collab with Mark as well!
8:51 Walking into an exposure store and ordering "whatever makes sense"
"Common Sense Exposure"
You can find a used GH5 or G9 for around 500-600 bucks, I just got a G9 and the V-Log upgrade, so it can shot 4k 10bit 4:2:2 in V-Log. Not bad for 500 bucks.
I really like my EOS R100. I bought it originally for a school project and because I wanted something cheap-ish to be able to take photos with. It fits my use case well, and I think I'll keep using it as my daily driver.
Interesting how the red camera has a weird comfortable nostalgic feel to it. Like watching RUclips 2008 where everyone was trustworthy 😂
”Geraffe Undone”
This was great - we need more Vlogs Undone!
Thank you Mark Bennett for helping out GU. This was a really fun episode. We need a group shoot of cheap cameras.
The Canon R100 looks great, for the cost I am actually impressed. ❤👍
when I'm looking for the cheapest looking videos I watch Marc's Bennelts Cammera Crississ.
I love that cheap sonofagun
😹😹😹hilarious
The Pentax records up to the usual half hour, that 30 second figure refers to slow-mo!
Correct! It will do 30 second 120fps slow motion clips with no audio which ends up a 2 min viewable clip at 30fps.
Bought both my S5II’s from Camera Canada. Great shop!
With these two, you don't even have to watch to know that it's internet gold. Thank you.
Another entertaining tag team video. Chris and Jordan better watch out.
Great job on the video folks! Thanks for making it. I sell those cables all the time. I expect to hear a version of the opening jingle to be "Giraffe Undone... He's crazy!"
Agfa in 2024 is the new neo-vintage brand thieving cool. Bring on those clipped highlights.
The AGFA photo sounds like "egg for photo". Let's see how accurate that is... also: a SELFIE screen?? That is... unique. Somehow I thought a flip-out screen would be the cheaper way of accomplishing that.
IMO more money into the camera than into the studio build up - this way you always have a better image to play with irrespective of the location. The R100 was surprising bad btw, and Agfa had good audio out of a box for a cam with no ports. In fact Agfa had a good vibe for a comedy channel 😄
Good to see You Two in the same vid! (I shortened the word "video" by whole two letters and then explained what I did in the brackets). I hope you guys will keep it up. Cheers! 👍
16:09 if you want background focus, this is your camera💀😹
Jordan from Petapixel would have been a great candidate for this format as well. Also I think, that he can ve roasted for his bag Peter-Lindgren-style.
You guys are a good duo for this kind of thing. Well done.
As someone who both films their own videos and watches youtube, im 100% fine with high bitrate 1080p. On a computer it looks the same as youtubes compressed 4k anyway and it saves me money, its exactly why i havent moved away from my 200d yet. Might get some improvement but not enough to dump 1-2k to replace a camera thats already good enough.
Oh how much Gerald loves Vlogging 😂
best guest ever
I don’t remember when I had good laugh last time 😁
You both are great guys 😂
I had to check if they were arcastic about Mark boosting Gerald's views LOL
Canon color right out of the camera is good, even on the cheaper models.
Honestly I'm kinda shocked how bad the Canon performed. At that price point I would have expected A LOT more. Yes it's "cheap" for a "real camera", but it's 600 bucks none the less and with Gerald's studio lighting even a mid-range phone camera would deliver adequate images. And the difference to other cameras that are just slightly more expensive or are a few generations old is MASSIVE. You can easily get a used Sony a7 Mk2 or something of the a6000 line for that price and those cameras run circles around the R100 when it comes to image quality.
Omg, in addition to my fx3, a7cii, etc... I have that underwater pentax point and shoot.... stupid thing works good enough for it to go to one of the kids.... until I got my go pro's, it was my only underwater rated camera. If memory serves correct, we've had it for almost 10 years now. Hard to rotate out.
What shotgun mic did you guys put on the r100?
0:48 not the RUclipsr hands coming out already 😂
Well, the conclusion could have been Mark's ZV-E10 moment. :D
I can't really understand what Canon does with its stuff, it was the same with the M50 Mk 2. In my country, the R100 is 450€ and the ZV-E10 (Mk 1) is about 620€, a new full frame A7 II is 720€. What Canon does with these cheaper cameras and their 4K abilities is just ridiculous because they advertised this R100 as an entry level camera, aiming at people coming from a smartphone. I highly doubt that people used to a smartphone will have any fun with this device because it doesn't even hold up to the standards of a modern smartphone. Smartphone shooters are hybrid shooters, so you can't leave video capabilities completely out if you are not coming up with any other major benefit. Doing selfies without a flippy screen isn't easy, too, I'd assume.
I hope Canon's CEO gets one of these on his next anniversary or whatever, he will have the nightmares of his life. :D
I have the canon r50 and you are able to charge the camera. And a way better sensor. The r50 is cheaper at 699 on best buy vs the r100.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wouldn't you get pretty good results with a GoPro Hero 11 ? It's $300 new. But I reckon you could find one for around $200 if you search.
Gerald, what watch do you have on your wrist?
You guys are the best
Now you need to get Kasey from Camera Conspiracies and do a slow motion running-across-the-street vlogging test. Kasey could train you on proper slow motion running technique, while also suggesting an all fruit-based diet. That last part will not be relevant to the camera test but will serve as the dramatic character arc for the story.
This.
haha its so good to see Gerald in the wild, rarely see the dry humour in a different place
The built-in mic of the canon sounds as good as the agfa 😂
This is the most Canadian Gerald video yet.
Haha, these are fun, just keep going mate. Y’all are the best.
any plans on reviewing the canon c80?
Should have put a better quality lens on the r100 just to see if that makes the 1080p footage a lot more usable
That was awesome!
Thanks for sharing it. ✌️
I’m not convinced Gerald has ever seen a giraffe before 😂
You should have done the Z30, though. It might be the best bargain for a 4K camera out there--how will we know if Gerald doens't check?
You probably could use the OG ZV-1 with great lighting and a mic for talking head. Not sure about THAT Canon camera… I still have a T3i that looks decent for 1080P
I have the agfa DC 8200 as a cheap photo camera as well as its cheaper brother DC 5500
For when i don't want anything with a power zoom but when i am a bit more serious but still budget i have a Kodak AZ 425
the r100 in the US is stupid cheap, so good to invest in good lens, mic and lighting
Hi Gerald. Please can you make us a video on video quality of Canon R5ii.. there are guys claiming that it looks soft compared to R8 axept the 8K raw files but that is huge and put a lot of strain on edeting system.
If i remember right these cables have a great warranty
Switch your studio camera setup to all Nikon as an experiment. See how things add up to Sony
You guys look like brothers.
Gerald speaks way too fast, some words are swollen, but the humor stays on :)
I’m Gerald Undone and I have Giraffe arms
Canon is barely competing with a 10 year old a6000
I think the z30 is the best choice
ffinally, wanted you guys to collab forever, do you like r100 vs zv1 ii as my first camera for photo, every says zv1 ii is bad for photo, do you agree?
for photos I would get the r100 with the sigma 18-50 2.8 over the zv1 - but it will cost more
What other cameras are good for photos that are compact? Is zv1 ii ok for photos, or is it only for video@@MarkBennettCameraCrisis
@@imfosher for ultimate compactness - the ZV1ii is a good choice. The photos are still good, but the image quality will be better on a a6100 with a sigma 18-50 or canon r100 with sigma 18-50. Those would be my picks. They will be bigger and heavier and not completely pocketable.
No ‘oh hi mark’ jokes from Gerald, much dissapoint 😢
I live in Botswana what can i do to find sameone like you....... i am filmmaker ...
This is so bad and awkward, please do another one
4K is overkill for video, I never watch your videos at more than 720p !
What tripod handle was in the video?
It's the Ulanzi TT38 - I reviewed it over on my channel
So it is I who lives in a parallel universe where buying a used GH5 with a kit lens for 650 is an option? Or what am I missing 🫤
That's cheaper RED camera. Aha! I knew what you did there!
You want a cheap camera showdown.. go buy 5 of the cheap cameras from TEMU.. now that’s a challenge.. part 2 you buy 5 of the action cam/go pro knock offs and see how well the Chinese have done copying it..
Gerald come back I miss you
Hi Marrkk Benet
Jersey Dirtfoot!!
These collabs with good banter are nice change of pace, very entertaining 😊👍
Worth it. 😁
Its like Ryan Reynolds and Hugh Jackman
Secondhand higher end cameras will be much better options at the same price.
For 899 CAD you can have an R50 that is million times better than the R100. The R100 should just not exist lol
woudn't your phone be better ?
Dang okay Gerald got an RS car. RS 5 sportback?
Coupé 👍
i just hope the wheels aren’t also Undone
@@geraldundone well done Gerald undone
Lumix LX100, I record a video for TV with it 😃
as far as i remember its better to spend a little more for r50 and get it as a first camera, rather than r100
more features, for a little bit more money
This R100 looks a lot like the M50
Where can we see some of your work that's not gear review? Like do you shoot videos or photos in your free time?
Mark looks like the girlfriend that Gerald finally decided to bring around the boys
I think an iPhone would be as good as that Canon camera especially in the studio
Or just get a Referbished Canon 80D fro like 400-500 bucks and get good video features, legendary canon color and more and call it a day
from now on record only using the Agfa camera
They are all good if you plan on doing photos only, for video no.
C80??