PREPARING FOR THE NAWCQ - YUBEL (DECK LIST AND COMBO)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 13 окт 2024
- I somehow missed 2 little knight in my extra deck so just replace it with one of the side deck cards! My bad! xD
If anyone has any questions or suggestions feel free to leave a comment and I will try my best to answer them!
Socials Below!
I think Dies Irae will end up getting played because of how well it covers the decks weakness. The deck is very weak against droplet, dark ruler no more and evenly matched. Now while Varudras can cover evenly, Dies Irae can cover all 3. If they go drnm/droplet you just go cl2 chamber. cl3 Dies Irae to negate drnm/droplet. It only doesn't work if your opponent discards a monster and trap with droplet which will rarely happen.
My usual end board would be Phantom of Yubel, Dis Irae, Varudras on my 1st turn, on my next one transform PoY into Chaos Angel, and whatever combination I have available to Link summon Abomination, then summon another PoY if the first one survived the previous turn
Reprodocus was an intresting tech card at first glance, but it doesn't do what it suppose to do.
If you have the +1 body, and you already playing, you can just go for a 3mat apollousa, and ignore the fiendsmith portion of the deck.
If you can't play, or you only opened with the sacred beast cards, reprodocus can't bridge you into the yubel stuff.
And the fiendsmith combo doesn't work because you can't use reprodocus as fusion material, so you have to shuffle back the fiendsmith, so can't even make rank6 plays, or go into dies irae. Currently im not sold on fiendsmith either.
It supposed to get you to the extra level 6 without playing the water unchained which it does do. Yes it’s not “great” but it definitely has a purpose.
Yes the sacred beast package isn’t supposed to be a 1 card in this build, just a supporting engine here.
Again repo isn’t meant to be a full Fiendsmith line, it’s just be meant to let a monster turn into a level 6 body.
I appreciate the feedback back and If we get closed sky this isn’t even an issue too talk about but I think it’s important to innovate just in case we don’t get it
Totally agree
At the moment fiendsmith add nothing creasy to our strong endboard and he doesn t even play the beatrice that could "potentially" give acces to samsara when you brick (i also think it is a bad idea)
Yeah, i don't want to take away credit from you, i love these kind of videos, and really enjoy talking about spicy tech cards.
I just think that everyone is hyped on the fiendsmith engine, but it doesn't fix the deck's issue rn, and doesn't add too much value. I feel the same with the princess engine.
This deck suffers from consistency, not from endboard power.
So i would just throw in the same consistency card we just played before.
no cap my experience with fiendsmith in yubel was like giving rescue ace emergency
@@notthrowinqygo2249probably cuz u tested it with ppl playing the moon link 2 wich isnt confirmed yet, if it were no one would be doubting the fiendsmiths place in the deck
Im using transaction rollback and ghost meets girl to work with beatrice. What are your thoughts to playing that sort of tech to slow down the opponent once fiendsmith comes out?
- Opening Gates is not at all "so much better" than opening DBB. Even with Droll in mind, you just get an SP pass, but still it requires you run a brick so 10% of times you open CSB can cause issues on top of the 30% of time the opponent has droll.
- Squirmer is a completely free extender working with any engine so I really disagree with 2 and consider those promoting 2 (and especially 1) people that are just theory crafting the deck without actual playtesting behind it (or OCG with 9 slots for Maxx C that can't afford the space).
- I went even down to 1 Samsara. While I get that in Fiend Link you don't want to see too many Yubel cards, don't forget that Samsara is also a 1 card combo just like Throne (but 1 less body) and Sacred Beast Engine (that requires a discard).
- I like the 2nd Tractus, it adds so much followup while it only requires a body (even a handtrap normal summon) to do the full fiendsmith combo.
- I believe Spirit should have a 2nd search target despite not liking Pain that much. Pain isn't that horrible in the first place, since you have 11 targets to pop without counting handtraps (Crow and Bystials are good for next format) in case you are in a rough spot. So 2nd Pain or even Chronicle for cases you open Pain should be experimented. Personally I find 1-1 ratio nice, because it allows me to play a bit better against Droll thanks to Phantom giving free counters.
All in all, even with Closed Sky confirmed, and despite the huge sealing of the deck (almost unbreakable board) I believe going full combo fiend link and competing that way with Snake Fiendsmith won't cut it for the deck. Snakes do the exact same job without any bricks, more non engine, and more of their cards are interchangeable starters/extenders. Yubel was like Unchained, mid range that can ignore popular handtraps (like Imperm Veiler Nib) while playing well against floodgates (not named TCBOO).
Why not have repro just make sharvara a light and begin fiend combo there? You could get the r10 sooner too
Good news for most people is I’ve been playing the deck without the Fiendsmith package and you can honestly get away with 1 copy of phantom. 2 MAX.
Phantom is a free extender. You should play 3 if you can
@@dominic7100 of course you if you can then do it but if you’re not tryna spend a ton you can do 1. Throne let’s you recycle it back anyway
@@RaffSolishow?
@@miguelrubio8093 when a lvl 10 yubel leaves the field thru card eff throne says add to hand then u can special meaning its a work arround to phantom being not properly summoned since adding to the hand just instantly adds it to the ed from gy or banished
Still i wouldnt recommend playing less than 2, 3 if u can.
@@dominic7100 3 is to much, you need ypur extra deck for potentional grindgsme and otk bossmonsters like the trains exiscode, griphon etc. 2 is enough you csn recycle them with throne or pop your anquish/soul of rage
I actually really like the list and the video for the most part, my only complaint is that the 1 card throne combo u showed is just really bad, u can end on a way better board at the moment without the fiendsmith cards and a discard so i just dont see the point in that.
Just for clarification my go to 1 card throne combo ends on phantom varudras apo for 2 with rage in gy and the trap.
This is just overall way better than the combo u showcased since alltho the 2 caesar negates are better that the apo ones (most of the time) trading the omni and potential pop for a lotus effect is really bad plus u lose a card in hand and access to ur muckraker for recovery in the grind game
Using cross-sheep for that combo?
@@gabrielsantiago7627 yeah
lot e omm
2:10 - You can, actually.
Yubel's summon is not a fusion summon, it's a contact special summon like vicious astraloud, and since phantom is both a yubel monster and a fiend with 0/0, it meets its own requirements as a legal target. The only stipulation for it to legally use itself to summon another copy is to actually have an additional copy in your extra deck.
This is unfortunately wrong
It's still a fusion material even if it's not a fusion summon