Thanks Eric I'm fairly new in BPM and I found this to be extremely helpful High level indeed however makes more sense than most CIO I've listened to on webinars etc... Thank you !!
Thank you so much @Eric. Your videos are helping me a lot understand the digital transformation sector in which I am planning to develop my career. Big thanks. I will follow you on LinkedIn.
Excellent. I really like the priority 'sliding scale' delineation between core and peripheral processes. Talking about priorities, especially considering time-starved staff, budget cycles etc, would you advocate for a 'maturity model' approach instead of a somewhat binary current-state / future-state approach? That is, at level one, our organisation looks like this, at level five it looks like this - agree a change project to achieve level x, then use a continuous improvement process (PDCA) to move up?
It does make sense to look first at the core business processes upfront. It may help in selecting/short listing ERP softwares for potential demos if they do meet at least to some point those core requirements. These core business process requirements could be show breakers for some ERP softwares .
![How Business Process Management Works [As-Is, To-Be, and Business Process Improvement]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/JW26Axtl5Kw/mqdefault.jpg)
![How Business Process Management Works [As-Is, To-Be, and Business Process Improvement]](/img/tr.png)
Thanks Eric I'm fairly new in BPM and I found this to be extremely helpful High level indeed however makes more sense than most CIO I've listened to on webinars etc... Thank you !!
Outstanding Explanation and details involved in each level,,, keep it going Eric.
This was a great video. Very informative and insightful.
Thank you so much @Eric. Your videos are helping me a lot understand the digital transformation sector in which I am planning to develop my career. Big thanks. I will follow you on LinkedIn.
Excellent. I really like the priority 'sliding scale' delineation between core and peripheral processes. Talking about priorities, especially considering time-starved staff, budget cycles etc, would you advocate for a 'maturity model' approach instead of a somewhat binary current-state / future-state approach? That is, at level one, our organisation looks like this, at level five it looks like this - agree a change project to achieve level x, then use a continuous improvement process (PDCA) to move up?
Very simple to understand
Keep the good work Eric
It does make sense to look first at the core business processes upfront. It may help in selecting/short listing ERP softwares for potential demos if they do meet at least to some point those core requirements. These core business process requirements could be show breakers for some ERP softwares .
Wow, greatly awesome, thanks Eric
Excellent. Well Done, Eric.
Great one Eric 👍👍
Very useful and informative, thank you
Thanks Eric. Great video.
Thank you, Gaurav!
Excellent!
Great video mate.
Thank you, Mario!
Terrific