Lol only if we want to suffer. This processor is good for a Windows XP retro pc, some old games are buggy with multicore cpus so this is a good alternative to a Pentium 4.
Two considerations if this were to be redone 1. Testing at lower resolutions (like 720P) 2. Recording footage on a different device through a capture card. This may make a considerable performance plus to the system as most people with hardware like this won't be recording their gameplay at the same time.
I record all of my videos through a capture card, which is plugged into a separate computer to record the footage. It's either my Maestro E-Book. Or my Celeron G5900T desktop PC. And the resolution does not seem to affect the performance much, if at all. As we are fully CPU bound here. Not CPU bound. (: But, I might make a video comparing resolutions to see if it makes any difference at all. I doubt it though. But we will see, if I make the video that is.
Note, I do not have a fancy capture card. Just a $15 one off Amazon. But it does the same thing as a high end one. Just slightly worse in every way. If I am not mistaking, it can record at 1080P, 60 FPS.
@@digitaljon1109 Okay, wasn't too sure. Most people I've seen record on the device they are benchmarking, which is known to skew results especially on a lower end machine. Do note, there's no way a $15 capture card would do 1080p 60fps. More than likely it's limited to a maximum of 1080p 30fps with MJPEG, which is low quality. If you are interested in getting a newer, better, capture card I'd recommend the EVGA XR1 Lite which can do 1080p 60fps capture and passthrough 4K 60fps signals to a display. It comes in at a retail price of $90, though it is known to go on sale often, sometimes as low as $50. Might also be worth watching some videos from EposVox, a RUclips content creator whom makes wonderful and detailed videos on the topic.
@@GavAttackO I thought of getting one. But I am happy with my cheap one. I am not sure if it's 60 FPS or not. I struggle to tell the difference between 30, and 60 FPS video.
@@hades9331 Ah! Okay. Back then my computer was a old office PC with a AMD Athlon XP CPU. I used that with Dial Up internet all the way up until 2018. To be fair, it was more than what I needed. All I did was open Microsoft Paint, and paint. I didn't web brows, I didn't game. I just used paint. I wanted to web brows a bit on it at times, but I couldn't work out how to do it back then.
@@hades9331 atleast it was a 3th gen celeron? like the 2th gen only had cips that they where only at the perf lvs of a core 2 duo,the celeron G550 is similar to my core 2 extreme X6800 at perf
Lowering the resolution won't help at all, or it does not seem to. As the resolution only really affects the GPU. So it does very little in terms of speeding up games in a CPU bound situation.
I don’t think people who still use this cpu are actually playing at 1080p though, gotta be much lower resolutions. Otherwise torture would be more fun than playing at these frame rates!
I tested a slow CPU at different resolutions and it actually performed the same as long as it's CPU bound. Here's the video. It is a different setup but it's still a potato. ruclips.net/video/hFfoXWgZ33U/видео.html
@@candidosilva7755 Nice! Was yours overclocked? Also, fun fact, GHz isn't everything when it comes to a CPU's speed. Even if both CPU's have the same cores, threads, and stuff. There is also how much a CPU can do with that 3 GHz. I am not sure how to explain it, as I have very little understanding of it. But you can have 2, 2 core, 2 thread CPU's at 2 GHz, but one is a lot newer, and it will do much more on the same clock speed.
I might do a comparison in a video to see if it makes any difference in a CPU bottlenecked situation, I don't think it will. But I get a lot of comments suggesting lower resolutions in a CPU bottlenecked situation.
Would you consider any of these games playable on this CPU?
All f2p games at the time 3a games like crysis is a big no.
@@hades9331 Awww!
Lol only if we want to suffer. This processor is good for a Windows XP retro pc, some old games are buggy with multicore cpus so this is a good alternative to a Pentium 4.
Two considerations if this were to be redone
1. Testing at lower resolutions (like 720P)
2. Recording footage on a different device through a capture card. This may make a considerable performance plus to the system as most people with hardware like this won't be recording their gameplay at the same time.
I record all of my videos through a capture card, which is plugged into a separate computer to record the footage. It's either my Maestro E-Book. Or my Celeron G5900T desktop PC.
And the resolution does not seem to affect the performance much, if at all. As we are fully CPU bound here. Not CPU bound. (:
But, I might make a video comparing resolutions to see if it makes any difference at all. I doubt it though. But we will see, if I make the video that is.
Note, I do not have a fancy capture card. Just a $15 one off Amazon. But it does the same thing as a high end one. Just slightly worse in every way.
If I am not mistaking, it can record at 1080P, 60 FPS.
@@digitaljon1109 Okay, wasn't too sure. Most people I've seen record on the device they are benchmarking, which is known to skew results especially on a lower end machine.
Do note, there's no way a $15 capture card would do 1080p 60fps. More than likely it's limited to a maximum of 1080p 30fps with MJPEG, which is low quality. If you are interested in getting a newer, better, capture card I'd recommend the EVGA XR1 Lite which can do 1080p 60fps capture and passthrough 4K 60fps signals to a display. It comes in at a retail price of $90, though it is known to go on sale often, sometimes as low as $50. Might also be worth watching some videos from EposVox, a RUclips content creator whom makes wonderful and detailed videos on the topic.
@@GavAttackO I thought of getting one. But I am happy with my cheap one.
I am not sure if it's 60 FPS or not. I struggle to tell the difference between 30, and 60 FPS video.
Try more games with this same pc
Nice video, I use to play on a 2 core celeron (1155) With ATI 6570 and 4 gb ram and it was ok.
Games league of legends, battlefield p4f.
Nice! Which Celeron was it?
@@digitaljon1109 I don't remember it was 11 years ago.
@@hades9331 Ah! Okay. Back then my computer was a old office PC with a AMD Athlon XP CPU. I used that with Dial Up internet all the way up until 2018.
To be fair, it was more than what I needed. All I did was open Microsoft Paint, and paint. I didn't web brows, I didn't game. I just used paint.
I wanted to web brows a bit on it at times, but I couldn't work out how to do it back then.
@@digitaljon1109 You can try to put your gpu 2060 and play some games.
@@hades9331 atleast it was a 3th gen celeron?
like the 2th gen only had cips that they where only at the perf lvs of a core 2 duo,the celeron G550 is similar to my core 2 extreme X6800 at perf
you should try lowering the res and see what the results are
Lowering the resolution won't help at all, or it does not seem to. As the resolution only really affects the GPU. So it does very little in terms of speeding up games in a CPU bound situation.
I don’t think people who still use this cpu are actually playing at 1080p though, gotta be much lower resolutions. Otherwise torture would be more fun than playing at these frame rates!
I tested a slow CPU at different resolutions and it actually performed the same as long as it's CPU bound. Here's the video. It is a different setup but it's still a potato.
ruclips.net/video/hFfoXWgZ33U/видео.html
Worst than my pentium 4 i had years ago the old socket 775.
It is significantly faster than the Pentium 4 641.
@@digitaljon1109 my pentium 4 was at 3ghz with the same core count.
@@candidosilva7755 Nice! Was yours overclocked? Also, fun fact, GHz isn't everything when it comes to a CPU's speed. Even if both CPU's have the same cores, threads, and stuff.
There is also how much a CPU can do with that 3 GHz. I am not sure how to explain it, as I have very little understanding of it.
But you can have 2, 2 core, 2 thread CPU's at 2 GHz, but one is a lot newer, and it will do much more on the same clock speed.
Lower resolution 720p
I might do a comparison in a video to see if it makes any difference in a CPU bottlenecked situation, I don't think it will. But I get a lot of comments suggesting lower resolutions in a CPU bottlenecked situation.
Did you read my replies from last video?
I'm not sure I tried to reply to everything everything.