FINALLY i see some video on this piece of fancy silicon i had for years on my mom's old pc. Still remember to this day when i changed it to a i5 2500, it felt like drinking a water bottle after a 50 mile walk on a desert.
I am not sure how slow that would run. But I more meant that for the socket. Any other CPU on the LGA 1155 socket is better than the Intel Celeron G440. (:
On my main channel, just posted a video about an FX competitor.. It's the Phenom X6. You will appreciate you FX even more once you see how bad the 6 core Phenom is.. It is allergic to any game new.
They are better- but not everyone has an AMD GPU. So I will test it with my Nvidia GPU for the worst case. But even with an AMD GPU, it won't make a CPU like this Celeron much faster, if any. I do own an Intel ARC A380 which I made some videos on, but I am not sure if that has the same "overhead" or not.. But it would not work right anyway, as it needs resizable bar. I am DigitalJon by the way.
understandable, but i would suggest looking up iceberg tech and hardware unboxed's amd driver overhead testing and the results may shock you. iceberg tech managed to achieve +200% performance on a pentium g3258 going from a 3070 to a 5700xt@@lockdot2
Sorry for the late reply. No. The Intel Pentium G7400 is a very nice CPU, and the GTX 690 is old, and sucks in 2023. Try to get a GTX 980 Ti, or something of similar speed. As that will get the most out of the CPU at 1080P. The GTX 690 can't open a lot of games, and in a lot of cases gets the same performance as the GTX 680, as the GTX 690 uses 2 GPU's together, which doesn't work with barely any games.. But even then, it still won't be able to open most modern games. And when it does open them, it will run very badly.
Like an i5 2300. www.ebay.com/itm/185999500830?hash=item2b4e6f261e%3Ag%3ADh8AAOSwfVZkuctU&amdata=enc%3AAQAIAAAA4AziuneBDPriP4iHmkQydZ9gPdDhQWRwHGysysCaIfozbbREq8RSUbpAqrpdT0Gld%2FSqezMl4NMz5xwRJtWDXBhsXxCKZRC7KOpJQmLpyHM6FS4Zq%2Bkxkd9N%2F8jseG2CI7oK5e2VEq8Q2rJbBP%2FF8KjQu48Zw68Gl09SbKl%2BoMW7K3dSJg1mVMbbiwivGHdZZPPdtdw%2FM9AsapYlLx4VEj4zdouA%2Bpa7bwfx66gABuhkdkHk0yD%2BrIONwbl3MUROKU4A%2FCicIfI5Zeom2nB7XGGRO7LwWaSSgg74CwQ0a7ut%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR5Ti_-HuYg&LH_BIN=1@@RyAdios
@@digitaljon1109 Oh no. The price for i5 gen 2 Here is 94 bucks with a full set item description lmao There are so many Full of middlemen in my country :") Ofc without dual VGA. Only intel hd graphics 💀
FINALLY i see some video on this piece of fancy silicon i had for years on my mom's old pc. Still remember to this day when i changed it to a i5 2500, it felt like drinking a water bottle after a 50 mile walk on a desert.
That "Smart Cache" barely helped
Yup! Maybe it's "Dumb cash"? 🙃
"Litterally any other cpu could run better"
Me buying pentium 4 1.3ghz on socket 423
I am not sure how slow that would run. But I more meant that for the socket. Any other CPU on the LGA 1155 socket is better than the Intel Celeron G440. (:
Why intel even made this? In 2011, for just 5$ more you can get celeron g530 with two cores and 2.4Ghz clock speed.
Finally a video of "can that cpu run windows?"
🙃🙃🤣🤣Yup!... Can it run Windows? Yes......... But BARELY.
stuff like this makes me appreciate my FX-6300 more
On my main channel, just posted a video about an FX competitor.. It's the Phenom X6. You will appreciate you FX even more once you see how bad the 6 core Phenom is.. It is allergic to any game new.
i think an amd gpu would be a lot better for benchmarking crappy cpus like this due to driver overhead
They are better- but not everyone has an AMD GPU. So I will test it with my Nvidia GPU for the worst case. But even with an AMD GPU, it won't make a CPU like this Celeron much faster, if any.
I do own an Intel ARC A380 which I made some videos on, but I am not sure if that has the same "overhead" or not.. But it would not work right anyway, as it needs resizable bar.
I am DigitalJon by the way.
understandable, but i would suggest looking up iceberg tech and hardware unboxed's amd driver overhead testing and the results may shock you. iceberg tech managed to achieve +200% performance on a pentium g3258 going from a 3070 to a 5700xt@@lockdot2
1 MB of cache is pretty bad for a CPU
I thread is very bad.
That's still something compared to a celeron 420
What do you mean?
i mean the intel celeron 420 has half the cache @@digitaljon1109
Will Intel Pentium Gold G7400 and NVIDIA GeForce GTX 690
work well together?
Sorry for the late reply. No.
The Intel Pentium G7400 is a very nice CPU, and the GTX 690 is old, and sucks in 2023. Try to get a GTX 980 Ti, or something of similar speed. As that will get the most out of the CPU at 1080P.
The GTX 690 can't open a lot of games, and in a lot of cases gets the same performance as the GTX 680, as the GTX 690 uses 2 GPU's together, which doesn't work with barely any games.. But even then, it still won't be able to open most modern games. And when it does open them, it will run very badly.
This processor should be in the $5 price range
I think it should be $1, as it is not very good. You can get i5's for $5. (:
@@digitaljon1109 really? Which generation of i5?
Like an i5 2300.
www.ebay.com/itm/185999500830?hash=item2b4e6f261e%3Ag%3ADh8AAOSwfVZkuctU&amdata=enc%3AAQAIAAAA4AziuneBDPriP4iHmkQydZ9gPdDhQWRwHGysysCaIfozbbREq8RSUbpAqrpdT0Gld%2FSqezMl4NMz5xwRJtWDXBhsXxCKZRC7KOpJQmLpyHM6FS4Zq%2Bkxkd9N%2F8jseG2CI7oK5e2VEq8Q2rJbBP%2FF8KjQu48Zw68Gl09SbKl%2BoMW7K3dSJg1mVMbbiwivGHdZZPPdtdw%2FM9AsapYlLx4VEj4zdouA%2Bpa7bwfx66gABuhkdkHk0yD%2BrIONwbl3MUROKU4A%2FCicIfI5Zeom2nB7XGGRO7LwWaSSgg74CwQ0a7ut%7Ctkp%3ABk9SR5Ti_-HuYg&LH_BIN=1@@RyAdios
@@digitaljon1109
Oh no. The price for i5 gen 2 Here is 94 bucks with a full set item description lmao
There are so many Full of middlemen in my country :")
Ofc without dual VGA. Only intel hd graphics 💀
Yikes! What country are you in?@@RyAdios