Testing 16mm lenses using a digital camera.

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 28 июл 2024
  • In this video I use my Sony FS5 MII to test some lenses that were created for the Regular 16 format. This technique allows me to analyze the characteristics of the lenses with detail and without spending money on film.
    I used a Sony camera because it has a dedicated Super 16 mode, but you could use a Micro Four Thirds, a DSLR, a Blackmagic or any other camera really to do the same. I tested lenses that have a C-mount, but it can be done pretty much with any mount.
    Ares rod support accessory for the Bolex:
    www.duallcamera.com/store/Film...
    (Not actual pictures of the accessory)
    Thanks for watching.
    0:00 Intro
    0:46 The concept
    2:31 Soligor 10mm f1.8 ITV
    3:27 Kodak Anastigmat 15mm f2.7
    4:03 Hugo Meyer &Co. 3" f2.8
    4:46 Kern-Paillard Pizar 26mm f1.9 AR
    5:46 Kern-Paillard Switar 16mm f1.8 RX
    6:28 Vario Switar 18-86mm f2.5 EE
    7:21 Zoom lenses coverage
    7:42 Conclusion
    10:05 Lens Demo
  • КиноКино

Комментарии • 27

  • @vipadventure
    @vipadventure Год назад +6

    Love 16 and Super 16 lenses. I have the Angenieux 12-120 f/2.2 RX and 16-78 f/2.2. I've used them with a cheap Canon EOS M hacked with Magic Lantern. In 2.8K raw mode it has a x2.9 crop, so I get to use those lenses with no vignetting and convert to CDNG.

    • @TheCinematographyLab
      @TheCinematographyLab  Год назад +2

      Cool! Those are good lenses and they definitely have a particular look. Mirrorless cameras have opened possibilities for those lenses.

  • @0800filmez
    @0800filmez 26 дней назад

    Amazing vibe and atmosphere

  • @TheCinematographyLab
    @TheCinematographyLab  4 месяца назад +2

    @jdfour7 The lens didn't vignette at all on the Sony FS5 II. I have noticed that the "Super 16" version of the Sony is smaller than the actual Super 16 gate. The crop S16 on the BMPCC may be slightly larger, but it should be negligible. You should not have any vignettes issues at all. Yes, almost all cameras reduce the format you can capture when you "crop" the sensor. I don't have a BMPCC, but I'm almost sure you will have to shoot in 2k if you want to shoot with that lens.

  • @patrickdonnelly5223
    @patrickdonnelly5223 2 месяца назад +1

    Posted to the FB page of C mount lenses.
    Thank you!

  • @patrickdonnelly5223
    @patrickdonnelly5223 2 месяца назад

    Japanese TV lenses are usually 1 inch sensor lenses with consumer 2/3 inch sensor lenses usually carrying a code to show that. The Soligor is a 1 " sensor lens. 2/3 inch lenses and 16mm cover an image circle of 11mm.
    1 inch covers 17mm. S16 gives slightly less. Primes often cover more than their minimum. TV lenses from Japan are still great value but may contain traps.

    • @TheCinematographyLab
      @TheCinematographyLab  2 месяца назад

      Makes sense. That Soligor lens looks different than the rest of lenses I got with the camera. It works alright, so I'll use it some time.

  • @xaksh
    @xaksh 11 месяцев назад

    Subbed. Really good insights into older lenses

  • @heroaomedia
    @heroaomedia Год назад +1

    Great video - any reason why you didn't show the meteor zoom lens?

    • @TheCinematographyLab
      @TheCinematographyLab  Год назад

      Thanks! I didn't have an adapter for M42 lenses ta the time. I recently got one,, so I'll test the Meteor in the future.

  • @chicobraz4335
    @chicobraz4335 10 месяцев назад +1

    Can a 50 cover s35?

    • @TheCinematographyLab
      @TheCinematographyLab  10 месяцев назад +2

      The focal length of a lens doesn't have anything to do with the area that it covers. There are 50mm lenses designed for Super 8. Those won't cover 16 or Super 16. A 50mm lens designed for the 16mm format won't cover Super 35 or full frame and so on, but a lens designed for still photo cameras for example will cover all those formats because they are smaller.
      We can say the same about modern lenses and sensors. A Micro Four Thirds doesn't cover the full frame area.

  • @jamessimsiv
    @jamessimsiv 3 месяца назад

    Which lens was used at 10:37

  • @tysonmaughan8883
    @tysonmaughan8883 5 месяцев назад

    Are you in Utah? Do you rent out your 18-86mm

    • @TheCinematographyLab
      @TheCinematographyLab  5 месяцев назад

      Yes, I am in Utah. I don't rent the lens. The copy that I have is in great condition. It would be hard to get another reliable lens, if something happen to it.

    • @tysonmaughan8883
      @tysonmaughan8883 5 месяцев назад

      @@TheCinematographyLab do you only use it for digital videography, or do you shoot much 16mm with it?

    • @TheCinematographyLab
      @TheCinematographyLab  5 месяцев назад

      @@tysonmaughan8883 I have a lot of 16mm gear and I use it to shoot film. I never use those lenses to shoot digital video. Do you shoot 16mm?

    • @tysonmaughan8883
      @tysonmaughan8883 5 месяцев назад

      @@TheCinematographyLabyeah. I shoot a lot of it for the advertising industry.

    • @TheCinematographyLab
      @TheCinematographyLab  5 месяцев назад

      @@tysonmaughan8883 Cool!