Is 360Hz a Waste? - 240Hz vs 360Hz Monitors
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 29 авг 2024
- Thank you to Ruipro for sponsoring this video!
Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (6FT): amzn.to/3wvHB7j
Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (25FT): amzn.to/432NDGS
Buy Ruipro Cables: ruipro.store/c...
Please Support My Work (Guides & Discord): / thedisplayguy
Is 360Hz a Waste? - 240Hz vs 360Hz Monitors
I know, I know, the human eye can't see past 4 frames per second, but guys 360Hz OLED monitors are here, and there selling like hotcakes, so is 360Hz truly a waste as some may think, or is it a huge upgrade worth paying for? Well fear not my fellow sweaty gamers, because as a reviewer whose thrown hands with over 20 OLEDs in just the last year alone I’m here to definitively answer that question, and in order to do so, let me buss down the 2 key advantages higher frame rates bring to the table.
The higher the frame rate the lower the input lag. Listen, you may be hard stuck in rookie lobbies now, but perhaps it's not you, but the high latency of your PC, who are we kidding, it's you, but regardless there is definitely an advantage to sustaining higher frame rates so you can react quicker. For example
60fps has a delay of 16.7ms
120fps a delay of 8.33ms
240fps a delay of 4.17ms
And 360fps a delay of just 2.78ms
As you can imagine someone at 360Hz will have a substantial advantage over a player with just 60fps, as they can theoretically react nearly 14ms faster, which doesn’t seem like a lot, but at high levels of play this is a huge difference and could make or break the game.
However when comparing 360Hz to 240Hz the difference is much smaller. In fact 360Hz is just roughly 1.5ms faster, and listen, faster is faster, but is this enough for you to have a substantial advantage? No. In fact many people may not even notice the difference if they aren't accustomed to 360Hz gaming already. Even worse, this tiny advantage comes at the cost of needing a PC that can pump out 50% more performance to sustain a stable 360Hz which also means spending A LOT more on your PC, but does that mean it's a waste?
Not necessarily
Before we make that call we need to talk about the second key advantage of higher frame rates. Motion performance.
Yes, everyone knows that lower latency is better, but in fast paced games seeing objects in motion clearly can be just as important to make sure you line up your shot correctly. This is likely the largest advantage running 360Hz has, because as you can see 144Hz OLED is already pretty decent, but trying to read text in motion is impossible. At 240Hz it starts to become much more feasible, but at 360Hz it is substantially clearer once again.
Now again you certainly don’t absolutely need this level of clarity, but even for day to day use the speed and clarity is quite nice, but in gaming it can give you that small edge you need to win the game.
However the question remains. Is it a waste? Yes and no. Yes it’s a waste in a sense that you have to pay for a significantly more powerful PC to get a small advantage in games, and I’m not just talking about the graphics card, you will even need an incredibly fast CPU and RAM to drive over 240fps consistently, but if your someone who can benefit from that advantage, or you simply enjoy the feel and look of ultra low latency & extremely smooth motion, then for you 360Hz will be worth it, as there is no technical disadvantage to having a higher framerate, so hopefully all types of monitors can eventually be available at 1000Hz.
But until that day, you will have to weigh the pros and cons of choosing between a higher resolution at a lower refresh rate, or a lower resolution at a higher refresh rate, and while that certainly will depend on your personal preferences, considering the diminishing returns beyond 240Hz, I think most gamers who play a mix of games would be better off purchasing 4K 240Hz OLED over a 360Hz 1440p OLED if you have enough PC power to run either option and you you can’t decide which you would rather have, as the bump in resolution & thus overall detail will be significantly more noticeable then the jump in speed.
Monitors Shown. Affiliate links below. I earn commission on purchases.
16:9 (4K)
Gigabyte 32" (4K 240Hz OLED) FO32U2: amzn.to/3W42Do0
16:9 (1440p)
Alienware 27" (1440p 360Hz OLED) AW2725DF: howl.me/clV5Xk...
Gigabyte 27" (1440p 360Hz OLED) FO27Q3: amzn.to/4awu8u1
Music
www.davidcutte...
Thank you to Ruipro for sponsoring this video!
Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (6FT): amzn.to/3wvHB7j
Buy the Ruipro HDMI 2.1 Certified Fiber Optic Cable (25FT): amzn.to/432NDGS
Buy Ruipro Cables: ruipro.store/collections/all
Please Support My Work (Guides & Discord): patreon.com/TheDisplayGuy
Monitors Shown. Affiliate links below. I earn commission on purchases.
16:9 (4K)
Gigabyte 32" (4K 240Hz OLED) FO32U2: amzn.to/3W42Do0
16:9 (1440p)
Alienware 27" (1440p 360Hz OLED) AW2725DF: howl.me/clV5XkZbvs1
Gigabyte 27" (1440p 360Hz OLED) FO27Q3: amzn.to/4awu8u1
I went from a 240hz to 360hz and in games where I can get that FPS, it is a nice increase in smoothness, but really only when quickly whipping the camera around.
I was sceptical about the difference, but I have been playing Apex on a PC at 240Hz consistently and whilst messing about with the new console 120Hz mode I tried 60Hz again, it feels like you are bogged down and heavy with the movement. I can't believe I thought 60 was enough in the past being a console peasant 😅 You might not be able to see the difference sometimes, but you can definitely feel it!
Your eyes must be slow then cause I instantly notice the difference between 120fps and 60 fps 60 looks dogshit
And 144fps vs 228fps is also a big difference in clarity you only notice a difference every 84fps/hz higher that’s why people say 60fps vs 144fps is night and day 84fps difference
240 is a huge and IMO necessary upgrade over 144. I expected after 144 everything would have diminishing returns. I wonder if we will think that about 240 Hz someday and we’ll all be upgrading to 480.
60hz vs 120hz you can certainly easily see it, but up to 240hz and more you don't see it, you just feel it
@@Prioz__ I can tell the difference between 120hz and 144hz easily. Not sure where you got that 84hz. Load of crap 😂.
do 240 vs 360 and 480hz
I have 165hz and 180hz IPS monitors with well tuned OD, and when I tried a 240hz IPS at my friend's place it's not a massive difference. However OLED is a completely different story, even at the same 240hz it's night and day clearity diofference. I'm switching to a 360hz OLED this year.
360hz feels smoother on mouse to .. not only on screen when u use high polling rate... Try to use mouse on 1000hz 240hz and try to use mouse 4000 hz on 240hz.. same with 360hz... but people never try so they can not know..
1:16 the 14ms difference is not the reason why someone has a clear advantage at higher refrash rate, its the smooter image leading to faster reaction.
@redg2197 wdym by that? That the image is clearer on a 4k @240 compared to a 2k @360? If yes than that's bs
@redg2197 Because resolution and clarity don't really go hand in hand. A 240hz tn or ips won't be as clear as an oled panel. No matter the resolution.
Even when comparing 4k 240hz oled vs 2k 360hz oled you'll have more clarity on the 2k monitor because of the extra frames.
Yes, 4k may have more details and look even better than the 2k monitor but the picture won't be clearer because of the higher resolution. Those are two different things bro.
I had the PG32UCDM to test out and while it was awesome it was too big and I wanted more hz than I had before (270) so I switched to the Aorus F027Q3 (2k 360 Oled). So I am talking from experience.
Also 2k is perfect for visual quality and high fps. Because even with my 4090 I couldn't reach 240+ fps in many games.
@redg2197 I think they might be arguing different points honestly.
There is motion clarity and then graphical fidelity. 1440p 360 on the same display technology would clearly have better motion clarity right, because the display is showing you more frames in the same time window. But 4K 240 would clearly have better graphical fidelity and look sharper right as you fit more pixels.
Hope that diffuses and clears up an argument I think was going the wrong way for no reason, as both were making correct points lost in a misunderstanding. Or who knows, maybe I'm reading it wrong as well!
@redg2197 motion clarity is king for a fps player. That's why some CS pros play at low and stratch resolutions
@redg21974k 32 inch has less than 30% more ppi than 27 inch 1440p. i would take the massive increase of fps and hz and motion and input etc than 29% more ppi and slower everything. theres a reason sweaty players use 1080p 24 inch
If you’ve played them both you know there’s a difference lol diminishing returns be damed when you ACTUALLY perceive the change yourself you can feel it massively.
I'm very latency sensitive and I got the MSI MAG 271QPX for $649 USD and I absolutely love it I came from a Cooler Master Tempest Mini LED panel and the HDR quality is much better on OLED plus the clarity and motion performance is wonderful I couldn't be happier with it and it's now getting firmware updates since MSI backtracked and it's getting the same firmware updates as the MPG model so no downsides anymore
Really? Where did you buy the monitor mate?
@@carlosquinterosantiago5590 it was on sale at best buy at the time I don't think the sale is going on anymore
As someone who has a 300hz monitor sitting next to a 165hz monitor, just about anyone can see the difference in smoothness, let alone sitting them next to a 60hz monitor. Anyone arguing against higher frame rates doesn't know what they're talking about. The interesting part is that ELMB, ULMB, and BFI work really well too without requiring an actual 300hz frame rate. I don't really care about the reduced latency, I just want a better experience. I hope more monitors incorporate ELMB/ULMB in the future. Perhaps OLEDs can have increased brightness for those modes since they're technically only on half of the cycle?
Wait for Gsync pulsar
All I have a 120 hz monitor & I still mop the floor in COD against people who have 360hz & 480hz monitors.
@@504Trey I don't even play competitive games. How well you perform at your circle jerk game doesn't change how silky smooth my frame rate is. So whoosh, and thank you for illustrating exactly what I mean by people don't know what they're talking about.
@JViz
120 hz is silky enough for me so I know exactly what I'm talking about 😎
@@504Trey Sorry to burst your bubble but you personally feeling that 120hz is satisfactory doesn’t mean that significant benefits can not be reaped above this refresh rate. If you can’t notice the effects above 120hz then there must be something wrong with your body; «silkiness» is also only one of multiple benefits that come from higher refresh rates.
I work with computers 6/8 hours a day and occasionally play some video games. When I went from a 60hz to a 120hz the difference was day/night. Now I have various displays: 90Hz(lenovo slim seven x laptop), 144Hz(lg c4 42"oled and an ultrawide VA 34" from MSI) , 160Hz (lg 38" ultrawide lcd), 240Hz (asus rog strix 16" laptop 2023 with mini led), but if I'm being honest, above 120Hz I can't see a substantial difference, even when I play. To be honest, I don't play competitively, but mainly single-player games! Having said that, thank you always for everything and congratulations on your beautiful channel, which gave me a lot of advice in choosing the perfect display!
There only seems to be low resolution options for oled right now. I haven’t seen many options over 5k
4k resolution is like the max for oled rn, but I mean there are also very few lcd's which can go 5k or higher. Like very few because for every other card other than the 4090 or 4080 5k and above is redicuously hard to drive even if you're somehow oke with 60hz
@@luukherfst1209 does this also apply for just general productivity use cases?
@thedisplayguy I capped the FPS to the half I had. Nothing changed. My Nvidia driver version is 551.86... Even with capped fps the flickering appears always in darker areas. No frametime spikes or framedrops.
Any other thing I can do?
For me the fact that you need a better PC to run 360Hz is a pointless argument for a few reasons.
First of all, most 360Hz monitors, especially OLEDs, are already expensive so if you can spend hundreds on a 360Hz monitor then you should be able to buy a PC that can get those kinds of FPS or you should stick to a lower refresh rate for now.
Second, most people who use 360Hz play competitive games like Valorant, CS2, ..., and most of the time they are not gonna use max settings ingame (depending on the game).
Thirdly, most of those competitive games are REALLY easy to drive, I have a GTX 1080 and a Ryzen 7 7700X and I can run Valorant 1440p at over 400fps even while using max settings.
4K 120Hz minimum from now on. Noticeable difference between 60fps & 120fps. Never seen or tried 240Hz so wouldn't know if it makes a difference or not.
is playing competitive fps games on a 32 inch 4k oled monitor too big? is it a disadvantage?
I have the same question! Currently i'm running a 24 inch 144Hz 1080p at around 65cm / 25,5inch distance
As someone who never thought I could manage 32”, I’ve used the 1440p 360hz and as of late even the 1080p 540hz. I returned the 540hz mainly because 240hz was always my bare minimum and I wanted the 4k for any other game I play. And after 2 days of nonstop overwatch, I can’t believe I’m saying this but I heavily prefer the clarity of 4k at 32” to 540hz fuzzy 1080p. I think I am preferring the 4k to make out the enemy team from a distance. At 32”, I can make my crosshair smaller than I used to so that it doesn’t overshadow my target’s head without being too small and losing track of it. I think 4k 240hz is the way to go if you play both competitive and single player games.
@@353darkesthour hmm yeah im leaning towards the 4k. but is the difference noticeable compared to 1440p 360hz? or does it all come doen to size preference?
@@clave2049 1440p 360hz will be preferable for competitve games but it completely depends on what you play more of.
@@353darkesthour ok i do play fps games mostly but i also like playing a few single player games and watching movies/YT
We like 27" 1440p for shooters mainly,360hz is just an extra
You should only get 360hz if you’re a top 0.1% player otherwise youre just wasting money and would only be buying a smoother screen for nothing but if you got the bread who cares go crazy
The 27 1440 480hz are coming this year right?
@@TheTykus LG will release a Woled matte coated 27" 1440p 480hz display this 4th quarter 2024,at least thats what they said on 2024 roadmap.
We? Speak for yourself
@@Prioz__considering 360hz OLEDA and 240hz OLED are the same price and with 360hz you don't have to get garbage coating you're not out anything.
@thedisplayguy
I tried to limit the frame rate. For example 60, but sometimes that even increases the flickering. What I noticed is that the FPS in the monitor OSD sometimes briefly jumps to 120+ fps and then back to the normal fame rate. This happens despite the FPS being limited to 60.
Is there anything else I can do?
I checked the framerate and frametime graph with msi afterburner and they are completely flat. No spikes or drops. The msi afterburner doesn't show these 120+ with and without the capped framerate. The framerate is clearly at 60 when capped at 60.
Could it be windows 10? So is windows 11 better for G-SYNC?
Could it be a faulty panel?
Please help!
i am not the display guy, but i do have a oled monitor and a fps cap did not help my flickering, but reducing the refresh rate on the monitor helped a bit. in right-click/display settings/advanced display, choose refresh rate. i tried everything from 1 hz below max to half.
some have success with only 2 hz below max.
then play with fps cap in games.
disable vsync everywhere, fps cap 2 fps below the monitor refresh rate with afterburner, enable gsync for all windows modes in geforce panel.
I dont feel like this was a deep enought review. If you play fast fps on a high lvl i would listen way more to what you feel in difference. Adjusting recoil should be way better with 360 hz. Also ofc you use it in comp shooters. So 360 hz are defently reachable.
i got 13900k, 4090, currently using a 144hz monitor, almost every game hits the 360hz mark at 1440p, every comp game does hit that mark.
bro, help me, my computer does not output more than 300 frames per second, if I put 240 Hz on my acer 390 Hz, will it be worse than on a monitor with a maximum frequency of 240?
No, it will be the same. You can even take advantage of it. A high vertical total allows you to refresh the screen in 1/390 second at any refresh rate, improving input lag. If you use backlight strobing, it improves crosstalk. Furthermore, an fps limiter at exactly the refresh rate removes input lag due to v-sync. I hope this helps, cheers.
Are you playing apex because its capped at 300 fps
Yes
Guys is it good to buy 360hz monitor for CS2 if my pc runs 260-330+ fps. I switch from 240hz because my monitor is broken
We need more non oled reviews.
Most people with 2 monitors don't want 2 oleds. Specially cuz it's usually doing static tasks, and having it go to sleep all the time is annoying.
i notice it, still choose 4k. if the text clarity was okay on 1440p i preffered 360 tho.
is 32inches too big? how is for fps games?
@@clave2049If your desk is deep, it's fine. I needed some distance. feels perfect for FPS. Going back to 27 inches will be hard.
@@Gates-Tech damn yeah i have the msi 1440p 360hz oled. but i honestly want the 4k cuz i feel like im missing out but i mostly play fps game and some single player games
@@clave2049 if you dont mind the text clarity you will have a better fps experience with your monitor:) i will add a 360 / 480 later . the extra fps in 1440p is a nicee bonus vs 4k clarity :)
@@Gates-Tech is the 4k clarity worth it? i have a 4080 super +7800x3d will my fps be ok?
I thought you were gonna say you've thrown hands with people with bad takes haha
I have a rtx 4090 core i9 ddr5 pc. I’m looking for a nice 1440p 360hz vesa compatible monitor, any suggestions?
MSI MPG 271QRXDE QD-OLED
@thedisplayguy Strange is... On my playstation 5 there is no flickering with VRR in Gran turismo 7 (only tested it in gran turismo 7) but on my PC with G-Sync there is flickering in every darker area in games.
Did you have flickering?
You need to adjust your game settings. Also PS5 and Xbox both override certain monitor settings automatically. So, use the physical buttons to open your monitors menu to check your settings there as well.
3:32 Putting Princess Rapunzel's upskirt animation on the CPU cooler - you dirty dog 😉
240 is the new sweet spot, 360 has diminishing returns.
If that's what you believe. . Speak for yourself
@@heavenbound9641 that's exactly what I did?
Speaking OLEDs at 1440p. 360hz costs the same as 240hz and doesn't have shit matte coating. So who cares if you think it's diminishing returns. Stupid to not get it for the same price.
I hardly noticed a difference going from 165hz to 240hz but once used to it 165hz feels way less smooth. Noticed jump from 240hz OLED to 360hz OLED instantly. I've been playing strictly competitive games for years now tho. I don't think you'll perform any better on 360hz vs 240hz but the difference in smoothness is very noticeable. Butter smooth. That being said not going 360hz is stupid if going 1440p since they are the same price. Also 4k 240hz is way harder to run. You may average it but your minimums and 1% lows will drop frequently making you perform worse.
would a 4080 super + 7800x3d be good for 4k 240hz on fps games?
@@MrDutch1e Snap niet waarom je bent gaan upgraden naar 360Hz, want beter wordt je toch niet in CSGO, OW2 of welk competitive game dan ook.
Difference between 360hz 2k and 240hz 4k is that gpus can actually reach 360hz 2k in some games.
5090 soon my friend
I get 240hz at 4k in the games I play with my 4080. It depends on what you play
@@bradnotbradis 4k 240hz still fast? im considering returning my 1440p 360hz and going 4k i feel like i would prefer more visual clarity but im not sure about the size too
@@clave2049 i would rather have 1440p 360hz. But i am on the LG with the 480hz dual mode, and it bridges the gap nicely.
If you said I had to play at 4k 240hz though, I wouldn't be upset, but the fact that these monitors are a couple hundred more than the 1440p 360hz models means that the jump up in price is a step back in gaming performance and thats not worth it to me. (if i did not have the 480hz mode)
4k 240hz oled better than 1440p 360hz IPS
What about 4k 480hz with dp 2.1?
@@edwinwebber5776 when those come out it will be the best
I bought an AW2524H 480Hz monitor and sooo far only been able to max that out running an extremely old Haven benchmark with everything set to low details on a 4060 Ti, much less playing any games at that refresh rate. I guess I could hook it up to my 4090 PC and see how that goes...but, unfortunately still, will be severely CPU limited even with a 13900KS.
I have done the motion blur test and MAN is it super smooth!! I guess I'll have to save this monitor until I get a future cpu and 5090 combo. 😕
For a 4080 super + Ryzen 7 7800x3d combo, should I go for a 240Hz or 360Hz?
def 360. have the same combo. almost all game running 300+ fps
We need monitors that do 5K120, 4K240 and 2.5K480.
640 HZ NOW!
Been waiting for this
I prefer 2 monitors one 4k 240 glossy oled and one 540 hz zowie 24 inch if have the money and chance to buy.
Hey. I have the Asus rog swift pg32ucdm. But it flickers with gsync.
I don't now what to do. It makes me really sad because I hoped that it doesn't flicker.
Did you test it for VRR flicker?
There are some situations like in Forza Horizon 5, the interior of the car (gray or black) flickers for example. Or some corners and darker areas in Avatar Frontiers of Pandora. Fortnite dark/gray areas aswell.
I'm on windows 10 Pro 64 bit.
My GPU is an Asus ROG Strix RTX 4090.
Could it be windows 10 itself?
Could anyone help me please?
Cap your FPS to something you can maintain and it will go away.
@@thedisplayguy I did. But nothing changed.
@@thedisplayguy I capped the FPS to the half I had. Nothing changed. My Nvidia driver version is 551.86... Even with capped fps the flickering appears always in darker areas. No frametime spikes or framedrops.
Any other thing I can do?
@@thedisplayguy Strange is... On my playstation 5 there is no flickering with VRR in Gran turismo 7 (only tested it in gran turismo 7) but on my PC with G-Sync there is flickering in every darker area in games.
@@Kaudrag33 It's because the Playstation 5's VRR range is so small, PC G-Sync is 30z-144hz, what usually causes flickers is wild FPS in that range going up and down. lock the FPS of that game that causes the flickering to 60.
Your motion capture images don't seem as clear as what I can eyeball on my LG CX on BFI High, which is 300Hz motion equivalent. (Maybe a bit more.) Maybe that is just the nature of such capture.
Coming from CRT last year, I sought out the CX/C1 specifically for this advanced motion feature. Such a terrible shame they removed it from subsequent models.
And 100 percent agree on hoping LG brings this C series screen finish to the monitor space.
no I don't need it... but I'll buy it because I want it and have the money
and not for competitive just for flawless gameplay and feel
480hz or bust!
600HZ !
240 vn to 360 oled is noticeable i need a new cpu now tho so cant experiemve it fully yet. So fucking clear its mad
240 vn is super smooth but 360 oled is stupid clear like illegal clear, too clear, and the blacks and the brightness its unreal
Hi Connor, what are some of your favorite videogames?
I don't even care too much about games, it's the general desktop use which takes benefit of the higher refresh rates, and you don't even need a powerful GPU for that. It's similar to phones, a phone with 120 Hz screen but crappy CPU will feel smoother than phone with 60Hz display and powerful CPU. Of course the benefits are somewhat diminishing but 360Hz still is 50% faster than 240Hz, so unless you have some severe medical condition like CGES (console gamer eye syndrome), you simply will notice it in day-to-day use.
The motion clarity is worth 10x the latency to me.
hey displayguy im a huge valorant player. Been using my old random 144hz matte disgusting monitor for 8 years in a row now. I never really had a problem with playing fine but want an upgrade for the quality of life I guess. The colours on my monitor are so washed out, yellow enemies literally blend it with the skies someonetimes and its so hard to keep track of them lol. I was wondering if the fo27q3 offered anything like extra vivid colour mode or something which would be nice. I don't mind oversaturated colours if I'm hardcore valoranting
You can typically oversaturated monitors in at least one preset.
i have only experienced up to 240hz, and all steps up to that is a good improvement.
what i want to test is if frame gen finally is usable if i had 360hz monitor.
because right now 240hz is not enough to enable frame gen.
for example in Robocop i got around 110fps and that is not enough base framerate to enable frame gen.
it is close, so why use it when i have to weight the pro's and con's.
if i had higher hz monitor i could get frame gen benefits without the drawbacks.
u need a 40-series GPU not a monitor
@@red6bull672 i got a 4090......
aorus fo27q2 with 240hz or aorus fo27q3 with 360hz ? My GPU is Rtx 4080 .
When we get a 480hz oled with bfi. I think that's going to be the best balance
I have a 360hz monitor, i World recommend for everyone Planung at 240hz to only Upgrade to 520hz. 360 is not that big Difference.
Unless you're on 240hz LCD, and go to 360hz OLED, then there's a huge difference.
@@AluminumHaste you will not notice the extra frames. it does not matter if you have ips or va or oled. the displaypane changes the graphic.
i got the 1440p 360hz oled and the difference is not that noticeable and im considering getting the 4k 240hz instead
@@clave2049 you will not regret it to 100%.
I have currently the fo27q3 1440p 360hz oled and before that I had the lg 27gs95qe and I like the gigabite a lot more, but not because of the 360hz, i basically don’t feel any difference between 240hz, i got it because of the glossy panel & all those nice settings like black equalizer 2.0 and stuff, or supersharpness resolution, it’s like using NVIDIA filters but without FPS drops and even on console possible.
But yh since I don’t feel a difference between 240 & 360, I ordered the 4k 240hz version of it
My 4090 can handle both 4k240/1440p360
And on ps5 you’re capped at 120hz anyway, and u cannot change the render resolution, so if a game like mw3 is rendered at 4k, you don’t get more fps when u use 1080/1440, cuz u can only change the output, that’s why the fps & the wattage doesnt change, so basically putting yourself in a disadvantage by using a 1080/1440p panel on PS5
0:28
anyone have a good monitor recommendation?
For a 4070ti? Im looking for a LG brand :) Samsung is okay but prefer LG
1000Hz monitors are on the way, but for sure it takes a crazy amount of PC horsepower to sustain that. Thumbs up!
Short videos ftw
if you're already at or a little above 120hz, dont bother until we're nearing 1000hz, diminishing returns yadayada
I have a 144hertz but My pc refuses tô go beyond 60 hertz no matter WhatsApp i try.
higher the framrate the less daunting the movement gets
Everything above 144hz is enough for most people. Everything above is marketing propaganda. I own both a 144hz and a 360hz screen and i dont notice much if any difference.
Just here to laugh at people who can tell the difference of 5ms.
It’s not just that bro. In the past i had 144 hz, 165, and 240 hz monitors. I can tell the difference immediately between the refresh rates. Now im switching to 360hz oled. The actual crispness of the image and the motion is incredible. Also the higher the refresh rate the more responsive the game is.
@@Mr.DennyB marketing brain rot works on the easily influenced.
I have a 360hz panel and switching to 240hz back and forth is easily noticeable. at least when playing CS competitive. it just feels smoother even if the jump is smaller compared to 144 to 240, which is massive
@@patrikmedia sure sure.
@@DrakonR just because you can't see it because of age perhaps doesn't mean others don't benefit from it. it's proven facts.
240 is good enough for most if not all scenarios. But you CAN'T easily get 240fps ON 4k even with a 4090 and max graphics. Realistically you'll be much easier getting 240fps (plus) on a 1440p. On a 4090 and max graphics. And things will get worse as times go on and even a 4090 will be midrange by then.
Practically, 240fps latency on a 360hz panel is the same or better than 240fps on 240hz panel.
So still 1440p 360hz wins over 240hz 4k.
High refresh rate is mostly meant for esports. 4090 can get 240hz at 4k easily in most of these types of games
It's so hecking easy to get more than 400 fps, even 500 fps at 4k resolution constantly in competitive games like Valorant, Fortnite, Overwatch, CS2, etc, but for triple AAA titles 144hz is more than enough(until the next generations of Nvidia, AMD, etc)
A RTX 4070 Ti non-Super and RX 7900 GRE can reach 300 FPS (engine limit) at 1440p at competitive graphics settings no problem. Overwatch 2 and Valorant will easily will pass 300 FPS as well.
can you explain why 240 fps on a 360hz panel is better than 240 fps on a 240 hz ?
people with 165hz
Bro I don't need over 100hz
went from 144 to 360 mehh its not a big jump.....anyone who reckons its a game changer is dribbling
You are a boomer than or your eyes aren’t good, there’s literally no way it’s not that noticeable to you. When i go back to 144 just to test it, it hurts my eyes. Especially in fast paced games
ips or oled ?
You need to make sure your game is also pushing 360 FPS and has fast motion scenes and gameplay otherwise you will not feel the difference.
If you are on va panel ot stays bad.
@@CheeseballNinja i play fps games brother there isnt much diff....
Keep up those The Rock memes!
AAA/AA games at 240-360 fps ? Competitive shooters and online games sure. Understand what you play and know what to buy. Ultrawide qdoled at 175hz is more than enough for me as I only play single player games.
what monitor if u play both fps and single player games and also like to watch YT/Movies? 4k 240hz?
Its a waste since there is 480 hz oleds coming
is it gonna be matte or glossy?
@@clave2049Matte.
@@andrewmorris3479 ew definitely going to pass on that
@@clave2049I believe LG is doing 1440p OLED glossy