We Figured Out Who the MCU Anchor Being Is!
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- Is Tony Stark, Doctor Strange, or someone else the Anchor Being of the 616 MCU? Head to www.squarespac... to save 10% off your first purchase of a website or domain using code NEWROCKSTARS.
Deadpool and Wolverine introduces the concept of Anchor Beings, individuals of such vital importance that their deaths trigger the erasure of their universes. Erik Voss breaks down the suspects to deduce who, exactly, the anchor being of the 616 MCU must be.
CHAPTERS
Check out our sweet, sweet merch! www.NerdRiot.shop
Subscribe | Enable ALL push notifications 🔔
New Rockstars: newrockstars.l...
The Deep Dive: newrockstars.l...
The Breakroom: newrockstars.l...
Follow New Rockstars:
Instagram: / newrockstars
Facebook: / newmediarockstars
Twitter: / newrockstars
Written by: Erik Voss
Head of Content & Executive Producer: Erik Voss / eavoss
General Manager: Zach Huddleston
Head of Production: John Costa
Director of Programming: Brandon Barrick
Senior Producer: Jessica Clemons
Post Production Supervisor: Riley Auskelis
Staff Editors: Drew Coombs, Joshua Steven Hurd
Editors: Kelly Joule
PATREON PRODUCERS:
Rick Denmon
RXJedi
For business inquiries please contact business@nrdigitalstudios.com
It’d be funny if the anchor was Phil Coulson seeing how his death is the reason the Avengers came together.
Nice.
Death of anchor=death of universe
@@pinaka5461 immediately lol so it still could be
It could be Phil since it takes thousands of years for it to happen
Phil was resurrected and technically still alive, since Agent’s of Shield is technically canon.
The sacred timeline doesn’t have an anchor nor need one. The other timelines need one to anchor them to the sacred timeline. Anchor beings are the ones that create that branch.
the true opinion
Makes sense
@@stevemariotv2007 it’s the only logical conclusion given the visual representation we are given during the Loki series of the sacred timeline structure.
The sacred timeline isn't special in the slightest. It's just another time line. It just so happened to be the one that belonged to the version of he who remains who won
There’s nothing special about the sacred timeline! It’s only named that by HWR and the TVA!
It’s Stan Lee I said it 🤷♂️
That makes a lot of sense. The MCU started dying after he did.
After Lee passed the MCU has been riddled with garbage
Watchers Informant never died in MCU
his last appearance was IW and Endgame
YESSSSS I WAS THINKING THE SAME 🎉🎉🎉
@@MisterEae DAM 😂
Howard Stark could be the anchor being. He worked on projects in WWI, WII, founding member of SHIELD, The Manhanttan project, kicks of the MCU in origins with Captain America, and set the foundation for Tony. Everything Tony has done was because of his father and even in death, he had influence on Tony's actions. The very details of his death divided the Avengers and in Endgame, Howard is the direct catalyst for closure for Tony.
He died tho
Since when did Howard met the Watcher in the MCU? I don’t think I recall that every happening
@@michealnotmichael6595 Wasn't MCU, in the comics
@@Happysecret180 They said the person could be daed for years already and be an anchor
@@b_e_thecreative Ah, well maybe but this is kinda irrelevant to the MCU’s anchor being
I'm going with Dr. Strage because of how Feige is super meticulous and specific about the words he chooses to use he called him "the anchor and the....actor to lead the mcu into the madness that is the multiverse"
I agree. It could even work with the whole "a few thousands years to decay" shebang because what if the timeline saw strange dying in dr strange 1 and then reseting time didnt fix it but he stayed in the loop for god knows how long. Feige literally said long enough for him to master the mystic arts. And we saw he mastered it alright. That takes some serious time.
My thoughts exactly.
The anchor being died 2 thousands years ago?
"What am I supposed to say? Jesus?"
Perhaps, "Marvel Jesus"?
😂😂😂😂
😂😂😂
Yeah Jesus seems like a good candidate
@@Nicholas_Chen_ Jesus would be the anchor being of our universe
I think it would be cute if they said it was Stan Lee. Everyone thinks that it’s Tony Stark but Stan Lee passed around the time of endgame. It would be such a clever way to pay homage to him.
And Stan would love that! Excellent idea!
I guess Stan Lee could be the Anchor Being for 1218 (our universe) the world went to shit after he passed
I was gonna say this. He's also been in more movies than Tony Stark
@@A4Kelly THIS!!
in reality, Stan Lee was indeed the Anchor Being of Marvel
I suspect if tony stark was indeed the anchor being, then 616 also started to die. why would paradox pick deadpool to join the 616 universe which is going to have a similar fate as 10005.
good theory but it's the sacred timeline so maybe paradox wouldn't want to prune it
Valid argument. It’s likely that either the 616 universe anchor being is still alive, or that 616 lacks an anchor being as that timeline can never cease
It could be on the process of dying since Tony died but after the events in MoM the incursion could play a vital role for the 616 universe to manage to survive.
Incursion may destroy one or both universes upon collision but I'm gonna guess it's possible for both universes to survive and merged completely together.
@@butcherdesuyoi Do you think TVA already knows that incursion is going to happen? God of stories might but Paradox!?
My mind jumps to Thor when discussing anchor beings. I foresee that it has to be someone with a long life span.
that’s why it has to be Captain America
@@brandonmerriman6884 funnily enough it's Doctor strange
No
@@terrancewhitfield548 the director of the movies said he was (can't remember his name)
I believe though that there is no anchor being in Earth-616 since it's the “Sacred Timeline” unlike the other universes that lives outside the sacred timeline which relies on an anchor being for the universe to live on.
Our Anchor Being
is Jonathan Majors. 😂
No
So we want someone who has been in the MCU since the beginning, who is still around now, and from a meta level has played a pivotal role in the universe? It’s Happy Hogan
Or Thor hear me out he can live for over thousands of years so could it be him
That...
It...
It's ridiculous, but makes *WAY* too much sense on both a story and meta level not to be true.
It's Jonathan Majors. 😅
@@Gorrilaguy95and deadpool has been saying this all throughout the movie. Why is thor crying. That defenenitely confirms thor being the anchor.
@@Shaunshahriarbecause the anchor is loki
The anchor being is whoever they feel is gonna boost the popularity and money for the mcu
👏
👏
Exactly it aint that deep. Its going to be about the money and revival of the company
I get the feeling it could be Doctor Doom.
He said that when he mentioned hugh jackman being the consistent star power in the fox films.. so yes you're right, but dig deeper
I don’t think that the main MCU has an anchor being. The idea of an anchor being I feel ties to the “sacred timeline.” Because of this I feel that there is no need for one because of the fact that it is the main universe.
I kinda like the idea that maybe the 616 universe is an experiment to fill a universe with multiple "anchor beings" - to see if a universe can survive when the focus is on multiple people
Tony and Banner for 2 reasons:
1- They were in the first 2 movies in 2008.
2- Tony and Banner used the Infinity Gauntlet in Endgame.
@@timurjack8773 both left the planet at times though... and its clearly not Tony considering he did die lol
@@timurjack8773banner has done very little for being an anchor being
@@RiverRockRecords Whether or not they were the anchor beings aside: Them leaving the planet doesn't matter. The whole universe is in Earth-616. Not just earth itself.
My vote is Happy Hogan... We see him in daredevil, he helped create ironman and the original mcu, he was apart of every major event and still shows up... suprise...
It’s definitely strange because in infinity war Tony asked him what does he do besides balloon animals and he responded with protecting your reality.
9:00 bruh feige is telling us it’s strange, don’t look so into it 😅
I was thinking the same thing like he literally just said it lol
you can tell by Benedict’s body language after Feige says anchor
If it’s a hero it would probably make sense for it to be Thor. He’s been around the longest, wasn’t blipped, is still active and has been through most all of the major events and seems to still have an important role to play. It’s feels like this current MCU universe will end when this version of Thor is done. It seems like they may be setting up to reboot everything after secret wars.
I agree, Thor is one of the principal characters for sure, he has the cosmic power level of others like Strange or Scarlet Witch BUT he's been around throughout almost the entire run of the MCU
Yeah, and it's a role that won't be hurt by the actor aging, as Thor does age over time to become more grizzled and wise like his father.
What if Thor was crying cause deadpool sacrificed himself for Thor, so that the 616 anchor wouldn’t die, breaking Thors absolute point 🤷♂️
Damn. I see what you did there bruh@@nebnub4965
Actually I didn't think about that he would be older than everyone of them except maybe loki
I think a great way to introduce Rdj as Doom would be to have the opening scene to be him killing the Kangs
yes, have it be that doom discovers kangs plans after a version of him appears in his world
Title: We figured it out! - Last Sentence: Tell us who it is!??!
Why couldn’t the anchor being be K.E.V.I.N? The robot basically breaks the fourth walls and immortal and basically controls everyone fates on the screen. Also Feige literally made MCU from scratch and has saved it from decaying whenever required.
Was that K.E.V.I.N. in Deadpool and Wolverine recording what Johnny Storm was saying about Cassandra Nova?
Bru you think they made a robot the anchor being I mean no shot lol but had to be him recording Johnny fs
KEVIN is not a living being. And he’s not from the sacred timeline.
Wong is the anchor being. We don’t know how old Wong is. He has been the constant in all of the McU movies before and especially after Endgame.
He was in exactly two movies before Endgame
I tink you are wong
He would have to die
Sounds lame
you must be asian wanting to live through him haha
My question atill remains: Why is an Anchor Being necessary if humans live only for up to 80-100 years?
Was there a prior anchor being? And if so, how is the mantle passed onto someone else?
Why is an Anchor Being necessary for the MCU?
Exactly what I was wondering
Do be fair, wasn't Wolverine immortal?
Maybe there is no Anchor Being before the Anchor Being is born?
Exactly my point
Who said the anchor being needs to be human?
It's Peter from Deadpool! Every universe has one!!!
Kang, Strange, or Loki being the anchor makes a lot more sense than the others. They both are major to the MCU and have key moments that could have caused the destruction sooner than later. Peter being one would be a nice idea but then him being blinked out and then back in should have fixed it.
Thor is a great alternative if it’s supposed to be an avenger
I like the idea of Happy being the anchor, he's in most movies, he's of vague importance
Maybe it’s Reed Richards. If one of the leaked plots of the latest Fantastic Four is them originally being from 616 but got displaced into another universe it would mean that the decay started in the 60s
Franklin Richards makes a little more sense based on the powers. Going off your example of they aren’t in the 616 universe anymore, having the anchor being never being born in 616 might increase the pace of decay. Meaning Franklin will have to get all his comic book powers and restore order. Kinda like the analogy of a snake eating its tail.
I'm not here to nit pick but the fantastic four that is coming up is set in a alternate universe. Their universe is in a futuristic 60's setting. That earth will die, due to Galactus. (As seen) The future foundation will build the arc and reed will take his family and who ever he can to another universe....ie 616. He cannot be the anchor of the 616. Wanda is the best best for me.
@@ashleypenhall7949 Except you are nitpicking because I mentioned leaked plots that I saw which could be plausible since the movie is in production.
@@calebmahoney2448 That is true I didn’t think of Franklin!
I don’t think it’s any coincidence Feige called Strange an anchor.
Plus he was accused for the incursion.
@@srempert11 They probably will claim it to be Strange. but i genuinely dont buy it lol
Honestly, I think Fieige knew exactly what he was was doing in that interview, saying how happy he was that the term "ANCHOR Being" was used and asked about. We've already had Nexus beings in the form of the Scarlet witch, but Feige's clearly establishing that qn ANCHOR being is different... Only two have called Benedict Cumberbatch and his Doctor. Strange the anchor of the MCU going forward in the multiverse saga.... That's not a coincidence at all, he was absolutely foreshadowing this term and it's important with Doctor Strange
Tbh yeah because guess what? He can likely likely timetravel so maybe has already died in theory?
By definition it has to be a Kang variant. The 616 "sacred timeline" exists far into the future with only He Who Remains.
Wanda is a Nexus being, which is in some ways the opposite of what we understand as an Anchor being. A nexus being exists in every timeline in some form and are bound to no one universe.
12:14 Kang was overrated and should not have been done without the introduction of the Fantastic Four
Kang, like Ultron, is best a one or two part film… where he’s defeated or killed and comes back from time to time in a different form.
Secret Invasion on the other hand should have been stretched out secretly or very subtly over a dozen films coming to a head in an endgame type movie.
What does kang have to do with the fantastic four lmao they just fucked up his introduction in quantumania
The anchor being is one of the soldiers protecting Tony stark
Airmen
It is Tony’s bowl movement
*Tony Stank
The anchor being is no doubt, Happy Hogan.
“What’s your superpower? Parallel parking?”😂
@@Fish-pi8lv 🤣 Great line!
The MCU has really struggled to properly define the rules of the multiverse. they've introduced several concepts:
-Nexus Event (Loki)
-Absolute Point (What If...?)
-Nexus Being (Multiverse of Madness)
-Anchor Being (Deadpool and Wolverine)
-Canon Event (Spider-Verse, non MCU)
considering the multiverse will all be coming crashing down by secret wars/doomsday I don't think it will matter anymore how confusing it is.
A clever writer ( like Stephen McFeely ) will be able to come along and reconcile all those things together in a satisfying way that makes thematic sense.
@@Ultramagnetic808 I hope so.
Wouldn't canon events just be Miguel's own name for Absolute points?
- the sacred timeline/tree being in alioth's belly
I think it’s T’Challa, his death has the most impact that we have barely scratched the surface of.
Strange seems more lore accurate, but Tony just makes sense
I'm honestly not sure anyone at marvel even knows 😭
we do
Obviously they do.
@@yTV-x6qyou don't work for marvel 😂
And even if they do, it’s subject to change once or a dozen times between now and ‘Secret Wars.’ The MCU is a cluster right now, no two ways about it. They have about four years to get all the essential cables connected to the correct ports.
Ppl who think Anchor Being is a real thing 😢😢
Maybe Nick Fury? I mean, without him, there's no avengers or discovery of other people in the universe rather than earth? But idk if they'd do that with secret invasions flop
I thought it'd be pretty obvious that the anchor being is Captain America. I'm actually really shocked no one mentioned him.
It's obviously Cap. Dude was allowed to manipulate the multiverse and return because he's essential.
And he's been there since day 1
Thank God someone who said it
@@SSJRadioBluthkey issues said he'd talk about it.
I was thinking it was either him Stark
The sacred timeline doesn't need an Anchor being, but if it did, it would likely be Reid Richards, or maybe Dr. Strange.
As fun as any of these characters being the anchor being would be, it’s likely someone we haven’t seen on screen yet
Guys, anchor being is a deadpool joke. Wolverine was the anchor to all the fox xmen movies... every xmen movie was more like Wolverine and friends. So when he died off, so did the franchise.
Anchor beings have to change often since none are immortal. Logan was only 200+ years old. This means that either that timeline branched off from the main timeline at his birth or there was another anchor being prior to his birth or him becoming the *Wolverine".
But the previous anchor being had to die, meaning the universe would collapse.
It doesn't really make sense.
@amadeus.7436 I mean the assumption here is that universes really have the "before the anchor" time.
From a meta perspective the fox Xmen universe only came into being with the first Xmen film. Same with the MCU and ironman.
Well it would mean wolverines parents are important since they birth the anchor being and the parents before them and so on. . .
The way I imagine it is an anchor being either comes into being right before the universe was destined to die or any being of a significant enough "mysterious" purpose can become the anchor being. That "mysterious" purpose only being mysterious to the TVA because they can't break the 4th wall. It's like how at the end of Deadpool and Wolverine, the combination of them both saved the universe. They became relevant enough to hold up the universe on their own. RDJ Dr. Doom will probably be the next anchor being.
If a universe’s existence depends on an ‘anchor being’ (aka its marketability) - then the Creator has a twisted sense of humor.
Imagine it’s Hawkeye lolol
There’s a reason Nat died for him 😂
Wong
Ulysses Claw😂…Baby don’t hurt me, no more
That’s the exact kind of thing Deadpool would do! 😂
With how meta deadpool & wolverine got. The anchor being is everyone who kept fans coming back to that universe. For x-men that was wolverine, when he died no one would really come back.
Loki is literally the Anchor Being of the entire Marvel.
To canonize all the weird missteps of the multiverse saga on Tony Stark dying as a canon event of an anchor being is low key genius! It addresses it and they will take notes
Maybe the Sacred Timeline doesn’t need an Anchor Being but it is the only timeline that can cause Incursions. Which would affect other universes’ Anchor Beings.
If Feige said Strange was an anchor for the MCU, it’s probably Strange.
Facts
616 is NOT the only universe that can cause incursions. 838 Strange caused an incursion in MoM by dream walking
@@anonemous7881 where was the dream-walker? Wanda was on Earth
@@MeguVusion Strange was the Dream Walker. Reed Richards explains it to 616 Strange. Thats why they killed him after they killed Thanos.
any universe can cause incursion
ive always said the thing about Strange's viewing of the potential futures is he can only see futures up until his death so maybe beating thanos wasnt that rare it was just rare D.S survives, but him being the potential anchor being is intresting
Or maybe he is anchor being of 616 and that's why he can't do what his alternative did in Multivers of Madness because he saw that this will destroy his timeline
I think it's either Odin or Thor.
Especially Odin since he was the all Father and had so much power over all other realms and the entire Universe as a whole.
The anchor being is such an interesting concept... I mean, the X-Men "reality" existed just fine before Logan was born, right? Probably for thousands of years. Why would an entire reality be tied to a mortal being who at some point in history will absolutely 100% die? Feels like an odd concept. I'm excited to see how they evolve on it.
Celestial Loki is a variant from a pruned branch timeline, 616 Loki is dead. He is on a higher plane of existence outside of reality.
That plane being inside alioth, who is in the void
What if Downey was kang? WAIT hear me out. We all so him in tropic thunder. If anyone can replace Jonathan majors it would be him
i think it's honestly going to be strange. he's going to be so important moving forward and he's crucial for the story w/ doom.
i thought the mcu timeline wouldn’t have an anchor because of how the mcu is like the sacred timelime and have so many of what would be anchor characters
the scared universe, what if it’s so sacred it doesn’t need a single anchor being, however the main point of it is gathering up the best anchor beings from each universe and gathering them up, such as they tried to attempt to do with deadpool from 616.
I think Kang makes the most sense, as it’s his “Sacred Timeline”. It is entire timeline relied on someone else, he would’ve found a way to preserve them.
This is a such a stupid guess considering he’s only been in one movie
The MCU writers have shown repeatedly that they are not handcuffed to concepts introduced by one writer, or group of writers. Yes, the 616 could have an anchor being but it could just as easily not have one.
this!
I mean sure... but they tend to stick with large concepts like this. Plus Feige was clearly happy that people are asking the question...
@@garrettcanavan9308 Do they tend to stick with large concepts like this ? Such as what ? How the multiverse works has been changed at least a half a dozen times & I'd say that's the biggest concept ever introduced.
Yeah but they wouldn’t keep talking about anchor beings just for 616 to not have one .
@@Heavytripss who keeps talking about them ?!!?
What if the anchor being was an an MCU Apocalypse that was killed thousands of years ago, possibly through a future time travel story. It could also be the "reason" why the mutants haven't been in the MCU
It could culminate in an time traveling extended bigger battle of earth being the reason why the multiverse opened up again after endgame.
" WE are Groot!
What better anchor than a tree with roots.
Given how deadpool is basically omniscient, I found it weird that the "main" deadpool isn't his world's anchor being. He surely isn't the main character of the MCU, but he literally knows EVERYTHING (or at least could get a hold of ALL information through the power of... movies? Idk what the ability is called 🤣), even more than Dr. Strange or any other character; which makes you think that such an important character is supposed to be a side character in the grand scheme of things. I'd bet all my money on MCU deadpool, though I'd say it's a different story if that version is much more different than "Mainpool".
Disney's Agatha might be set during the Multiverse of Madness and a scene might take place where Agatha will appear last minute to save Wanda.
Wasn't it in Johnathan Major's contract that no one else could play Kang? All variants had to be played by him.
I was waiting for you to say KANG!
with the sudden introduction of the fantastic four, you could do a major reality warp by Franklin Richards recreating all of reality, and him being the anchor being.
2:46 my guess stan Lee
Kang as the anchor being… people would straight riot. Lets just be happy folks seem to be on board again with marvel movies from the deadpool goodwill.
If they make Kang the anchor being, then have Cable be the one who kills him, then you can introduce Cable coming "back" to fix what he started, the incursion
Ravonna from Loki should be Kang's female doppleganger, like Sylvie and Loki. It would be a good wrap-up to their weird connection during season 2.
The problem I would think with Spiderman, Doctor Strange, and anyone who got snapped by Thanos is that until Deadpool and Wolverine replacing an anchor being was never established so the question becomes whether or not bringing an anchor being back to life after 5 years of death saves 616 from slowly dying out.
Everyone’s a gangster until it’s revealed that Thanos was the anchor all along lol It’d be so funny 😂😂😂
I think revealing that Stan Lee was a Watcher that went against rules to help the hero’s a bit for the future threat (Doom) would be cool as hell as the anchor being.
Or it could just be Tony but I really want Stan Lee to be confirmed as a watcher that tried to help (Like the one from Ultimate Alliance 1 if anyone remembers that old game)
How did Deadpool travel to the 616 for the interview with Happy?
I too want the answer to this question!!!
@@siddharthmovaliya7963 i think it was through cables time machine as this interview was just a bit after deadpool 2 and he even says he destroyed cables time machine after this interview when he gives up on everything
How did he travel to Ryan Reynolds reading the GL script and the Origins timeline where he killed tha universes him.
The answer is the same.
@@SMunlimited but the time travel device is just supposed to only allow you to move forward and backward in time not allow you to multiverse travel
@@rhodrage Fair
I don’t think the MCU doesn’t have one as it is the main timeline and I don’t think it is supposed to die off
I wouldn't be surprised if in the end Loki somehow assumes the role of achor being. Allowing it to be some off screen being who is unlikely to die.
Stark is the anchor being. Just watch how much everyone has bitched about the MCU since he died!
I think Tony being an anchor being makes so much sense since you can take the films not doing well as the universe dying after endgame.
Huh, I thought the thing with Thor was just a joke. Now I'm thinking Deadpool might be in the next Thor movie. Which kind of works with how silly and weird the Thor films have become.
I always wondered why Doctor Strange was playing with water when he could’ve easily froze it during endgame. Maybe he is the anchor being.
Isn’t it more logical that the 616 universe does not have an anchor being, because the main mcu timeline is the ‘sacred timeline’. Maybe thats why our universe is non deletable or something
Only sacred because Kang choose so
@@szalaierik still could be.
@@MedroffYT kang doesnt dictate the laws of the universe
Strange anchor being of 616
The alternative battle against Thanos in MOM really undermines the whole 1 bit.
I don’t think there is a anchor being for the 616 universe because it’s the sacred timeline it’s never supposed to end
Kang chose it to be the sacred time line..
@@MrCake-ui8uo now that you say that I vaguely remember that and now I gotta go rewatch Loki
That’s why it’s loki
@terrygallo8999 that's what I was thinking, loki died in endgame but a version of him was brought into the 616 universe, so I think it is loki as he is literally the anchor being holding the timeline together
Steve Rogers could be a good candidate for being the Anchor Being
It's the one person who so far has created incursions where 2 realities merge.
So far, that's only been seen with Dr Strange
5:43 you had me in the first half 😂
This video is so REACHY it makes Reed Richard’s blush
I don't think just one person could be the anchor being, i think it depends on what the person is supposed to do in their timeline and whether or not they meet that goal, literally all of the avengers could be considered anchor beings
Maybe Nick fury ? Or maybe they have a multi anchor beings since it’s the sacred timeline
It kind of makes sense that Strange would be the anchor being if they ever bring it up again. There's no doubt he would learn he was the anchor being, and we've seen how obsessive he can become with prolonging the life of a loved one or even an entire universe.
Loki. It's Loki. He was the first, good villain. And now the MCU Loki is the God of Stories.
It's Loki.
What if the MCU’s anchor being is… Howard The Duck…
I bet Doom died in 616 due to some sort of accident or other and because of that Tony died as well. It’s possible that there are 2 anchors and if one or both die it’ll effect the universe is why there will be a Tony Stark/Doom lookalike lol
Anchor being is such a stupid concept. How did a universe exist and stay together for all the billions of years before their arrival? Why would one being’s existence cause a gradual decay of spacetime upon their passing, when they almost always have very finite lives?
It was a plot device to bring Wolverine back for at least one more film, but beyond that, well, it kinda falls apart.
This concept is from the comic books. Not created for Deadpool and wolverine. I get what you're saying, but it wasn't just a random design just to sell movies, like you're implying, because it came from the secret wars comics.
It’s not that hard to understand. Before the anchor being was born doesn’t mean the universe falls apart. The reason for that is because The Anchor Being hasn’t died. Dead and Born are different. When family talks to you about times before your time they don’t say “Before you were dead” no they say “Before you were born”
@@ttt9830 It's still stupid. There's no logic behind it. They don't even bother trying to come up with a reasonable explanation as to why it works like it does.
Completely agree
@@stevil6669 it still could be used from the comics for that purpose, and when used in the comics it is a pretty random design. and poorly thought ou
I guess Tom Holland Spiderman is the anchor being for the MCU Earth-616
perhaps so
it should be tony
@@silverlovegunsnope
When early rumors were coming out about the anchor being plot in Dp and Wolverine (which ended up being true), they were also saying spiderman was the mcu's anchor being so...yeah, hope so.
Feige and Sony
The anchor being is the friends we made along the way
I don't think it was Paradox who wanted the timeline erased.
I think it was someone a little more calculating. Someone with a little more gravitas, capable of ushering in... doomsday...
well its spiderman if were going by the script that was scrapped apparently....
I thought Nick Fury. He’s been in the most projects excluding Stan Lee (may he rest in peace) and first conceptualised The Avengers.
Sorry to hear about your fathers passing!
After Tony died MCU is struggling
I guess RDJ is the anchor being for MCU and they brought him back. 😂😂😂
Fun fact. They are called "nexus beings" in the comics, not sure why the name change but it is the scarlet witch in the comics.