Why New F-22 Replacement TERRIFIES China

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 апр 2024
  • 🚀✈️ In May 2021, the US Air Force announced plans to retire the F-22 Raptor, the pinnacle of fighter jet technology, by 2030, sparking widespread debate. Despite its unmatched capabilities, why retire this aerial titan so soon? Dive into the complex saga of the F-22, explore the technological advancements on the horizon, and uncover the strategic reasoning behind phasing out one of the skies' most dominant forces. #F22Raptor #USAirForce #MilitaryTechnology 🌐🔍 #usa #america #freedom #airforce #fighterjet #f16 #f22 #militaryanalysis #militarytech #economy #geopolitics #militarysecrets #china #world
    #themilitaryshow
  • НаукаНаука

Комментарии • 530

  • @bjketchum6308
    @bjketchum6308 Месяц назад +16

    F22: Would you intercept me….. I’d intercept me

  • @trueTrumper
    @trueTrumper Месяц назад +86

    I am a veteran and was a mechanic for the late A-6 Intruder.
    I truly believe the F-22 will be like the A-10.
    They'll be around for a long time.
    😊

    • @llkk290
      @llkk290 Месяц назад

      In front of China's J20, it is obsolete~

    • @karlericsanzenbacher3145
      @karlericsanzenbacher3145 Месяц назад +2

      ​@@llkk290Have they solved the J20's reliability issues? (no snark - I'm curious to know what you've heard)

    • @BeetleBro978
      @BeetleBro978 Месяц назад +4

      I agree the F-22 isn’t going anywhere. They just want an excuse to built something new but the F-22 is still a fine aircraft and far superior than pretty much everything out there. They can roll out the 6th gen but the F-22 will still be in service

    • @llkk290
      @llkk290 Месяц назад

      @@karlericsanzenbacher3145 You should ask, have all the problems with F22 been resolved? There is nothing wrong with the J20 except that it is very powerful.

    • @Gichie79
      @Gichie79 Месяц назад +19

      @@llkk290 China troll

  • @alexhigginbotham8635
    @alexhigginbotham8635 Месяц назад +74

    Sadly for Russia the F-15 STILL outclasses anything they can put in the sky.

    • @sontung4552
      @sontung4552 Месяц назад +21

      Stop this nonsense, you are disrespecting the F15 by comparing it to Russian airforce.

    • @legro19
      @legro19 Месяц назад +1

      You can't compare them. One side you have crazy engineering build only to deliver the best performance possible, on the other side, you have plane build to be easy to mass produce and need the less maintenance possible.

    • @danmackey9462
      @danmackey9462 Месяц назад

      In all fairness Russia did it to themselves. They lied about what their aircrafts were capable of. So we built a rocketship to exceed their specs. Unfortunately for them they grossly lied so when we built something that could beat their lies it was light-years ahead of them because they didn't have what they said they had.

    • @Markymarkcy
      @Markymarkcy Месяц назад

      ?
      Did you watch the video?)
      A dog fight is rare even now
      An SU 35 can likely see and fire off a missile before most blocks of F15/ F16 would know.
      Unless the western supplied aircraft given to UA are fitted with the latest possible kit..they are vulnerable.((

    • @danmackey9462
      @danmackey9462 Месяц назад +5

      @@Markymarkcy the f-15E has a superior radar the APG-82 is much stronger radar than what the SU35 has. The SU35 has a smaller cross section on the radar but the F15 would see it first or at keast the same time. And the F15 is faster and more maneuverable than the SU35. Plain and simple the F15 might be old but 2 things the F15 strike eagle set the climb to 100k feet record in 1975 and still to this day has been beaten even by the F22. And the F15 is 104-0 in dogfights world wide. That's the definition of fuck around and find out.

  • @Actionbasstrd
    @Actionbasstrd Месяц назад +204

    The United States military has the first and second largest Air Force in the world The second belonging to the United States navy.

    • @CrazyDee279
      @CrazyDee279 Месяц назад +10

      Yes yes, I was on the USS Constellation and she is old but still could hold 85

    • @JunyuYue
      @JunyuYue Месяц назад +3

      Although I don't have the heart to disturb your party, I would like to say that in China's fortress waters, the F22 will not shoot down anything, but will be shot down on the ground and in the air.
      Not counting the engine, the F22 produced 30 years ago lags behind the J20 in terms of missiles, EOTS, radar, stealth coatings, avionics systems and data links.
      As for experience? I think our pilots have already fought against the F35, haven't they?
      Don't forget that the most important thing in modern warfare is the military system. Plaaf has the world's largest fleet of land-based AESA early warning aircraft, which ensures that we have the upper hand in the confrontation with the F22. Chinese satellites have long since achieved optical tracking of F22 and uploaded the video to the Internet.
      Not to mention that the j20 is also being upgraded when the f22 is upgraded/or replaced by NGAD. I think the usaf should focus on building more f15ex instead of thinking about using stealth aircraft to hunt turkeys all day long.

    • @peterarmstrong6928
      @peterarmstrong6928 Месяц назад +26

      ​@@JunyuYueIt's the B1,, you need to fear 😘🇺🇸💥

    • @CrazyDee279
      @CrazyDee279 Месяц назад +24

      @@JunyuYue Haahaa, sure

    • @JunyuYue
      @JunyuYue Месяц назад +2

      @@peterarmstrong6928 Even the old Phalcon system can detect b1. . . I think what you're trying to say is a lot of jassm

  • @jp9095
    @jp9095 Месяц назад +68

    Watch, the NGAD's operating system will be called Skynet.

    • @loundclear9279
      @loundclear9279 Месяц назад +3

      Your very very close lol. But the tag system is about 5 to ten years away .Basically its a drone that can fly by AI , Its stealth and carries agms , so beyond visiual range on of the tag drones can make its signature big like a flight wing. 5 or more aircraft , Its to draw agm systems and or other aircraft by increasing its radar signal. This will cause Agm systems to either fire 5 missles or more and cause them to expend their missle for a large scale attack when they are firing at nothing. And allow the Tag system to fire or designate targets to a f22 or other plane outside the radar area of the targets.
      Basically when the Ata missles come on line and fire they give up their location. thus allows them to be enguaged long before the ata systems know excatly whom or what they are firing at. its really a great system.

    • @pike100
      @pike100 Месяц назад +1

      The Skynet jokes are already getting old and stale. 😢

    • @ralphmersdorf1098
      @ralphmersdorf1098 Месяц назад +1

      They already have the claim skynet .. look out John

    • @jp9095
      @jp9095 Месяц назад +1

      @@loundclear9279 So it's designed to troll enemy defense systems?
      That's so American it's absurd.

    • @loundclear9279
      @loundclear9279 Месяц назад +2

      @@jp9095 Yup basically, That’s one reason why the us is not really building anymore raptors atm.
      China has the radar signature of the raptor but not the ability to see it further from wich they can engage it.
      So now the us said hey let’s exploit that and that’s what they are doing
      Once a Sam sight becomes active its signal is broadcast, our ships awacs and so on can see them.
      Now think about it an enemy thinks 10 planes are coming they activate 6 sights and fires at nothing lol now the counter fire will hit them from the other jets it’s called tags

  • @moneymatrix3434
    @moneymatrix3434 Месяц назад +3

    F22-“ I’m not going anywhere, I’m just highly classified and super advanced waiting for shit to pop off”

  • @NathanDean79
    @NathanDean79 Месяц назад +13

    The radar cross section of a Raptor is still smaller than the F-35. It’s even a little less than the F-117. The F-35 has a very small RCS but the Raptors is even smaller. Currently the B2 Bomber has the smallest RCS followed closely by the F-22 then the F-117 then the F-35. That doesn’t mean the F35 is any worse of a plane. Its RCS is tiny and it would have to be flying within 20 miles of the most advanced radar to show up. The B21 Raider is going to be the best though.

    • @Jaden48108
      @Jaden48108 29 дней назад

      You're completely right that the B-21 Raider is a scary aircraft given it doesn't need an onboard pilot, can fly at incredible altitudes, carry heavy payloads with all different kinds of ordnance, can conduct spy missions and go anywhere with impunity because it has the smallest RCS of ALL stealth aircraft. Other countries won't be able to compete given its astronomical price tag.

  • @ShootBlueHelmets
    @ShootBlueHelmets Месяц назад +92

    The F-22 should go nowhere until the entire NGAD force is online. I understand why the A-10 needs to be retired as well, but we need enough F-35s in inventory before one A-10 goes away. Anything less would be incompetent at least and probably wilfully treasonous.

    • @LiquidSnake690
      @LiquidSnake690 Месяц назад +11

      We can't retire the A-10 Warthog yet because we don't have anything to replace it with. The F35 can't replace the A-10 Warthog because it can't be used in the same way A-10 Warthog's are used.

    • @davidford3115
      @davidford3115 Месяц назад +8

      @@LiquidSnake690 Indeed. The F-35 is basically the doctrinal equivalent of the F-4 Phantom: jack of all trades, master of none, sucks at everything.
      There is a reason why the US Army threatens to train its own A-10 pilots if the USAF retires it. Even the US Marines love the A-10!

    • @AG-en5y
      @AG-en5y Месяц назад

      Many of the air frames are from early 2000's. They're way past their life span. So would you retire them and put your money into a new project? Or spend a little less but still a significant amount to repurpase the senior geezer old frames in hopes that things don't fail?

    • @LiquidSnake690
      @LiquidSnake690 Месяц назад +2

      @davidford3115 Plus the A-10 Warthog is better for close range support.

    • @davidford3115
      @davidford3115 Месяц назад +2

      @@LiquidSnake690 An internal study which the Air Force tried to bury for three years warned that those CAS skills would be lost if the A-10 is retired and the F-35 is shoehorned into its role.

  • @gofoats
    @gofoats Месяц назад +13

    Take the "Non-Combat" 22s and make them the new Thunderbirds! I've seen an F-22 practicing near where I live. It can stand on its tail once it is wheels up and climb at 89 degrees like it was a rocket.

    • @fw1421
      @fw1421 Месяц назад

      Too expensive to operate. As it is both the Blue Angels and Thunderbirds aircraft are all very old birds. They get refurbished and new paint jobs before they go to the teams.

    • @scopedog9197
      @scopedog9197 10 дней назад

      The F22 airframes have some serious hours in them.

  • @rikvanderheijden7664
    @rikvanderheijden7664 Месяц назад +22

    Because they didn't have a chance yet trying to copy/paste it? 🤔

    • @levelazn
      @levelazn Месяц назад

      the price of the f22 and its failure rate is enough to scare the chinese to not copy it :)

    • @wan3416
      @wan3416 Месяц назад

      Its failure rate? Pray tell what mission capable rate you’re referencing. Or perhaps you’re a Chinese bot and this is just communist nonsense, per usual.

  • @heartlessangel1460
    @heartlessangel1460 Месяц назад +30

    F 22: "I MUUUUST EAT!!!!"

    • @graceliu8839
      @graceliu8839 Месяц назад +10

      Would you intercept me? I’d intercept me.

    • @hbkm40
      @hbkm40 Месяц назад

      Have the Chinese send more balloons

    • @lyft4238
      @lyft4238 Месяц назад

      ​​@@hbkm40F22 is losing its mind going after balloons
      Send the SU-57s and the J35s
      It needs to eat

  • @Tunda2
    @Tunda2 28 дней назад +2

    They must’ve seen the aliens if they’re already replacing that monster

  • @mrroman3862
    @mrroman3862 Месяц назад +20

    But China alway like to say they ain't worried about the U S ....Till there are 😂

    • @deezeed2817
      @deezeed2817 Месяц назад

      It's the U.S worried about China. I think you don't really understand how afraid your politicians are of losing global hegemony and the multipolar world

  • @fareast20
    @fareast20 Месяц назад +2

    You lost already when you underestimate your enemies.

  • @ajosralastname7823
    @ajosralastname7823 Месяц назад +7

    Shouldn't get rid of the old f22, should just have both.

    • @Turf-yj9ei
      @Turf-yj9ei Месяц назад +2

      The problem is that fighter jets have a lot of wear and tear on their airframes from flying at supersonic speeds and high g maneuvering. This means the planes have to be retired after so many flight hours. With the F-22 production line closed older models can't be replaced by new builds so it makes sense to develop a newer more advanced fighter vs spending so much $ restarting factories from a mid 90s design

  • @jasonariola6363
    @jasonariola6363 Месяц назад +9

    If Russia confronted the U.S. Air Force , the attrition rate of first line pilots will leave Russia with no pilots or trainers to confront China 🇨🇳 ir retain pilots lost to attrition

    • @deezeed2817
      @deezeed2817 Месяц назад

      lol Russia has nukes. If it ever escalated to that then it wouldn't matter. Secondly what do you mean confront China? China isn't Russia's enemy or trying to destroy its economy and military.

    • @FrostWolfPack
      @FrostWolfPack Месяц назад +2

      What I have gathered on as many sources as possible Chinas big problem is lack of true expirience of real conflict.
      Thye can boast of well trained troops and pilots and even high tech gadgets they dont have true know how how that be used in the field.

    • @toucan221
      @toucan221 Месяц назад +1

      @@FrostWolfPack Correct, experience counts for a lot, that is why Russian jets are getting shot down over Ukraine so easily, they only have half the hours of flying time that the Us has.

    • @PeterPeterPumpkinEater-fv5pd
      @PeterPeterPumpkinEater-fv5pd Месяц назад

      ¹¹❤​@@FrostWolfPack

    • @eustacemcgoodboy9702
      @eustacemcgoodboy9702 29 дней назад

      If? Russia is currently taking the largest country in all of Europe with the best farmland. Step up or shut up.

  • @miguelrogerswyatt6900
    @miguelrogerswyatt6900 Месяц назад +4

    I'm just glad we're the ones who own the skies

  • @Sarge-at-Large
    @Sarge-at-Large Месяц назад +5

    We can’t afford to begin retiring the F22 until the 2030’s when NGAD has at least a dozen operational units. Despite having such a large Air Force, the United States still requires more air power. This is especially true considering very likely future losses from the conflict in Taiwan

    • @UEAdmiral
      @UEAdmiral Месяц назад

      Agreed. Having the airframes to assure dominance is one thing. Having the logistical capability to deploy them all to a given theater is very much another. If you can’t put numbers in the field, you’re gonna need to replace more losses than you’d otherwise need to replace.

  • @frankmcgowan3371
    @frankmcgowan3371 Месяц назад +3

    The US is retiring the best fighter jet in the world and China and Russia doesn’t have anything to match it. That’s how far ahead the US is ahead of these regimes.

  • @Exile-exe
    @Exile-exe Месяц назад +5

    It won’t be retired, it will remain in support role.

    • @FrostWolfPack
      @FrostWolfPack Месяц назад

      Very likely even tho in smaler scale and maybe even half the fleet be turned spare parts rest hundred or so craft is still larger fleet of planes tan many nations have as their main.

    • @Exile-exe
      @Exile-exe Месяц назад

      @@FrostWolfPack they will not canibalize the F22. It will serve as a support shock troop for the Ngad fighters which will redefine air superiority.
      I watched a war game simulator based on what little we know where 9 NGAD with only 3 human pilots the rest drones, went up again 91, Su 35s and 57s and wrecked the entire air fleet in 30 min while losing only 2 Ngads. I’ve never seen such lopsided air combat. It was unbelievable.
      F22 support in this scenario would have sped things up even more.

    • @FrostWolfPack
      @FrostWolfPack Месяц назад

      @@Exile-exe Well I think there be some reduction of the F22 due the lack of infrastructure to resuply the needed parts. Redusing the active fleets size and making rest as spares would reduce the cost keeping them around.

  • @eliasmai6170
    @eliasmai6170 Месяц назад +4

    No weapon system stays supreme forever.

  • @jonaguilar6199
    @jonaguilar6199 Месяц назад +1

    Let the Kid out!!! Grandpa Buff wants to see him in action.

  • @tomfull6637
    @tomfull6637 Месяц назад +39

    The default but yet soo tiring and disappointing YT-format:
    A) State an eye catching subject as the headline.
    B) Start the content from the birth of the universe and then keep on rambling about anything but the subject in the headline.
    I hope this helps you to improve!
    My comment will improve your position in the YT-algorithm, I know that but I, I am out now! After 8.45 and without any information received related to the headline! Shame on you!
    Unless….the astronomical costs for F22 make the Chinese crap their pants…😒
    Fill me in if so and I will delete this post.
    Regards
    Anders
    Sweden

    • @sacer666
      @sacer666 Месяц назад

      Håller med till 100% så många personer som gör just detta, tror att denna kanalen har gjort det ett par gånger innan med olika videor.
      5:58 för mig.

    • @hillbilly4895
      @hillbilly4895 Месяц назад +1

      90%+ of RUclips is crap...finding the 10% is why you're here, right?

    • @UEAdmiral
      @UEAdmiral Месяц назад +1

      Thank you. Saved me 8 minutes.

    • @ChaoticRain1
      @ChaoticRain1 Месяц назад

      wholeheartedly agree

  • @kaylzshter6153
    @kaylzshter6153 Месяц назад +1

    This was a great video, I can tell you take the time to research these topics thouroughly

  • @petertyson4022
    @petertyson4022 Месяц назад +1

    I think they should keep some for emergencies. Maybe a special flying op squad or something.

  • @christophergreen3538
    @christophergreen3538 Месяц назад +1

    Variety and the ability to adapt is what can dominate.

  • @williamwillaims
    @williamwillaims Месяц назад +1

    The scale on these maps makes me chuckle 😂

  • @davidmehling4310
    @davidmehling4310 Месяц назад +4

    Would you intercept me, I'd intercept me. F22 on HBC

  • @GizzyDillespee
    @GizzyDillespee Месяц назад +9

    Your thumbnail haf nothing to do with the topic. Last time I fall for it.

    • @Istandby666
      @Istandby666 Месяц назад +1

      It makes it hard to want to participate in click bait.
      These people don't have to use click bait. Just tell the truth.

  • @harshtruth9148
    @harshtruth9148 Месяц назад +2

    Range has been fixed with the new stealth drop tank program which just took its first flight

  • @gforce0311
    @gforce0311 Месяц назад +2

    All F22s have received their updates which allows them to link with f35s

  • @PilotekzyWT
    @PilotekzyWT Месяц назад +8

    chinese planes looks like flying toys

  • @dne9394
    @dne9394 Месяц назад +5

    High maneuverability is not necessary now. With helmet based targeting, if the pilot can see the target, be can shoot it.
    But most shots will be taken from 75 miles+ out.

    • @xlxl9440
      @xlxl9440 Месяц назад

      IDK. I would still like the NGAD to have dogfighting capabilities. You never know what type of situation you may find yourself in on the battlefield. Better to be able to dogfight and not need then to somehow find yourself in that situation and not being able to handle it. I have seen some renderings of the NGAD that has foldable vertical stabilizers for added maneuverability if needed that could be deployed. Although from what I understand that while supposedly being less manuverable, the NGAD certainly won't be a flying brick. Using horizontal stabilizers to create good maneuverability. And I would like to see a gun added, however, I'm certain that the NGAD (and the Navy's equivalent) will be designed to have a laser when that tech become mature. Just a thought. I'm not an aerospace engineer or an Airforce military strategist so I'm sure I don't know what I'm talking about. Lol 😅

  • @charleswomack2166
    @charleswomack2166 Месяц назад +2

    The F-22 is a dominant jet, but ultimately it comes down to dollars and cents.

  • @Compton3clipsed
    @Compton3clipsed Месяц назад +1

    Just consider that these other countries are getting all excited because they are finally creating planes (sort of) that can start to match the ability of a plane we started making in the 1980's, almost 40 years ago.

  • @theenchiladakid1866
    @theenchiladakid1866 Месяц назад +20

    Just like the f22 the runner up will be better

    • @DocWolph
      @DocWolph Месяц назад

      I hope not. That the generals this time, actually look at ALL the candidate planes and really think this time. They are not going to have "it looks like and F-15 and I like F-15's" as a fall back this time.

    • @TK199999
      @TK199999 Месяц назад +1

      Actually if you take a hard look at the YF-23 and the NGAD, you can see that in fact the NGAD is modernized YF-23.

    • @Istandby666
      @Istandby666 Месяц назад

      ​@@TK199999
      I can't wait for military airplane RUclipsrs to start putting out videos after the release of the NGAD on how much better the YF-23 is today and was back then. A true aircraft before it's time.
      Look at the exhaust of the B-21, the bottom is like the F-117 and the top part of the exhaust is like the YF-23.

  • @jasonariola6363
    @jasonariola6363 Месяц назад +2

    F-22,air frame is already old , I hope the air force has a plan for this and to give it area awareness it may not have now especially IRTS for beyond visual range

  • @delphy2478
    @delphy2478 Месяц назад +1

    i love the idea that hte US is retiring a jet to replace it with a better jet, when the rest of hte world is still having some trouble matching that jets predecessor

  • @user-rk3wn6uh6r
    @user-rk3wn6uh6r Месяц назад +1

    Retiring the Raptor is a mistake and as usual, they are going to realize this when it’s too late.

  • @ralphwiggum874
    @ralphwiggum874 Месяц назад

    Highly appreciate the metric units!

  • @jcarieri5435
    @jcarieri5435 Месяц назад +2

    I thought that they are upgrading existing f22s not replaceing them?

    • @larryc1616
      @larryc1616 Месяц назад +3

      Gen 6 replace Gen 5 like B-21 replace B2

  • @rustyshaklferd1897
    @rustyshaklferd1897 Месяц назад +1

    Was this made before the stealth external fuel tanks and weapons were made public?

  • @guyfleetwood8004
    @guyfleetwood8004 12 дней назад +1

    Let's face facts. To this day, only America has real stealth aircraft.

  • @MrMichaelBCurtis
    @MrMichaelBCurtis Месяц назад +1

    The F22 also has stealth IR, the engine is masked, something the chinese and Russians have not been able to do

  • @kaylzshter6153
    @kaylzshter6153 Месяц назад +8

    It always struck me as strange that some of the most lethal weapons of war are also some of the most beautiful things ever created. The F-22 and B2/B21 to name just a few are very aesthetically pleasing, and if the renders are anything to go by, the NGAD will be too.
    These planes are literally art. I just want to look at and appreciate them every chance I get.
    We are a weird species.

    • @f1hotrod527
      @f1hotrod527 Месяц назад +5

      Yeah they are bad ass looking and beautiful. The new Corvette C8 even has styling cues from the F22 with its angular look and saw tooth hood opening.

  • @handelrussell1858
    @handelrussell1858 Месяц назад +3

    Ambassador Bridge!!

  • @Jaden48108
    @Jaden48108 Месяц назад +3

    Go to minute 9:24 if you want to get to the replacement of the F-22. Everything before that is not-so-new-news.

  • @harrygough2810
    @harrygough2810 Месяц назад +1

    A.I. produced channel guys, though the videos are interesting and well put together…

  • @dne9394
    @dne9394 Месяц назад +2

    They now have stealth drop tanks for the F-22

  • @amankumbhaj2132
    @amankumbhaj2132 Месяц назад +1

    This means 4th & 4.5 gen will not loose it's relevance.. with stealth missile & drone

  • @bryanleverett2830
    @bryanleverett2830 Месяц назад

    Every price that was mentioned needs to be doubled if it started today due to real world inflation, not reported inflation.

  • @user-wp4cs6eg8q
    @user-wp4cs6eg8q 28 дней назад

    The only reason they retire them is so they can then sell them to other countries. This is a nightmare.

  • @aCycloneSteve
    @aCycloneSteve Месяц назад +1

    If everyone is using stealth & missiles can't see them, having a gun might be wise.

  • @dalekapsch8230
    @dalekapsch8230 Месяц назад +1

    How stupid can they get, Airforce and navy our getting out of hand.

  • @Istandby666
    @Istandby666 Месяц назад +1

    The F-22 retirement will be like the F-117. It's still flying, but the lack of interest in the 22 will fade away and the NGAD will be the new kid on the block.
    I don't see the Air Force letting go of the 22. They'll cut the fleet in half, maybe even up to 2/3rd's. Then people will start to see wrapped up 22's at David Monthans Air Force Base for uses as spare parts.

  • @majorasothermask1258
    @majorasothermask1258 Месяц назад

    If they're thinking about retiring the F-22, they have stuff that's already 20 or 30 years more advanced tucked away somewhere.

  • @kinngrimm
    @kinngrimm Месяц назад +1

    if Boeing has anything to do with the development of the NGAD ... maybe doublecheck the bolts ^^.

    • @user-fq7vs8dl5k
      @user-fq7vs8dl5k Месяц назад

      Why blame Boeing? The union workers on the assembly lines are building planes that are falling apart.

  • @kokeskokeskokes
    @kokeskokeskokes Месяц назад +42

    I think the U.S. taxpayer is even more terrified.

    • @billwang5462
      @billwang5462 Месяц назад +8

      Not at all.

    • @Blackreaper95
      @Blackreaper95 Месяц назад +1

      I got a tax refund 🤷🏿

    • @isaacbrown4506
      @isaacbrown4506 Месяц назад +9

      Not even a little bit. These bad boys will make our enemies think twice and I get cool ass air shows

    • @TheBeardedWonder23
      @TheBeardedWonder23 Месяц назад +2

      ​@Blackreaper95 not the flex you think it is.

    • @isaacbrown4506
      @isaacbrown4506 Месяц назад +9

      @ryanhunter1612 keeping us protected and global trade safe is literally the most important thing. Without safe trading our economy would be in ruins. Stop tax cuts for the rich, that could easily pay for more important things.

  • @slwiser1
    @slwiser1 Месяц назад +1

    The biggest thread to the NGAD is the US Congress.

    • @pike100
      @pike100 Месяц назад

      Threat, not thread.

  • @mobius0691
    @mobius0691 Месяц назад

    The F22 is the best looking aircraft that has ever been designed

  • @michaelhilborn4204
    @michaelhilborn4204 Месяц назад +4

    Had you gone with the F-23 Black Widow II instead it would still likely be useful.

  • @knockemoutjohnjustjohn2763
    @knockemoutjohnjustjohn2763 Месяц назад +1

    Excuse me but the F22 now has stealth drop tanks, radically improved avionics, great new electronic warfare capabilities, vastly improved networking qualities a a new helmet system similar to the F35. Also, new stealth sensor pods, better than ever radar, plus more.
    Tut Tut. You didn't do your due diligence on this video guys. Your better than that.
    From Iowa............................John

    • @Toddnesbitt
      @Toddnesbitt Месяц назад

      Yeah for a freaking billion dollars extra.

  • @55Reever
    @55Reever Месяц назад +4

    The limited procurement of the F-22 was because of the NGAD. Tech is moving so fast.

    • @pike100
      @pike100 Месяц назад +2

      No, the limited procurement of the F-22 was due to the collapse of the Soviet Union.

  • @user-pp5or5og4k
    @user-pp5or5og4k Месяц назад

    F117 was supposed to be retired. It currently still operates and operated long after it's official retirement. I doubt the F-22 will be retired.

  • @OrionLaerithryn
    @OrionLaerithryn Месяц назад

    The F-22 is being replaced by NGAD which will be replaced by the TR-3B Black Manta.

  • @RDBean
    @RDBean Месяц назад +1

    Pardon my ignorrance, but until you have a functional better aircraft than the F22, should not we keep the F22s in service?

    • @gazzman6547
      @gazzman6547 Месяц назад +2

      F35 is better than F22 the only F22 advantage over F35 is the stealth.

  • @mtmadigan82
    @mtmadigan82 Месяц назад

    A few years ago there was a call to restart the f22 line and a few allies wanting to purchase some. This was seriously considered. Then they went looking for the custom machine tools and jigs they used. There was suposed to be a few of every common part. These were supposed in a bunch of connex boxes at a few storage yards on us military facilities. Half were empty, publicly there wasn't any releases on what happened, lies/theft/foreign assets. Many see this as the problem that stopped the look into restarting these facilities. Lies, but with some basis in reality. As things were unfolded and looked at, it became obvious this wouldn't be a good idea. Came down to money. The companies that built custom products like microprocessors and many avionics,weren't in business anymore. And what was there needed to be overhauled, there was little infrastructure to do so in a way that would have been acceptable.

  • @martinhope6542
    @martinhope6542 Месяц назад

    Bad idea to bench the f22, ai and drones are also a bad idea, you will never beat a well trained free thinking service man with a decent bit of kit

  • @gooldii1
    @gooldii1 Месяц назад +1

    Great

  • @tsmatthx2
    @tsmatthx2 Месяц назад

    It's not retirement at all...literally none

  • @chrisholder4978
    @chrisholder4978 Месяц назад +4

    NGAD has already been built and tested. Will replace the F22.

    • @shadooks4774
      @shadooks4774 Месяц назад

      The official release of ngad to the public is planned later this year

    • @chrisholder4978
      @chrisholder4978 Месяц назад

      @@shadooks4774 Thats awesome. All told, it was built and tested in one year which is crazy.

  • @jimjefftube
    @jimjefftube Месяц назад

    4 is hysterical? Maybe 50 on the ready out of 177, but anything less sounds stupid particularly when weighed against the cost?

  • @Deadshilz
    @Deadshilz Месяц назад

    So Sonny will be the whole idea

  • @lee20454
    @lee20454 Месяц назад

    Anybody who talks about F22 being an incredible and the best machine in a air and at the same time complain about it high costs, do not understand that F22 is the only thing that can keep Russia and China in check up until new NGAD up and running in production line numbers. We want to give our pilots to give the most advantageous jet regardless of the costs.

  • @jamiemeza6148
    @jamiemeza6148 Месяц назад

    Question will the sixth generation get fighter will it have guns😊

  • @CrazyJoeClark429
    @CrazyJoeClark429 Месяц назад

    Also if that is your reason for moving to 5th Gen then sell the plane to other countries since the tech is out dated

  • @robertcuellar4132
    @robertcuellar4132 25 дней назад

    29 % of your f 35 are mission capable

  • @Toddnesbitt
    @Toddnesbitt Месяц назад

    I think they should just keep the F-22 and not not updated and keep it around for a while like they were going to do I think it's too nice of a plane just to throw away. Sounds like that's what they have in mind anyways. I would imagine parts for that are really expensive I'm sure they stopped making them a while back but they should just probably take one or two of the crappiest ones and just pull parts off it like a junkyard. We don't need no stinking badges!

  • @troybing6665
    @troybing6665 Месяц назад +3

    I don’t believe they will retire it, they said they were going to retire the A-10 Warthog instead they upgraded graded it so don’t believe what you hear 🇺🇸

    • @LSmoney215
      @LSmoney215 Месяц назад +2

      They just retired 50a10 this year and all will be retired by 2030

  • @daniellopez20100
    @daniellopez20100 26 дней назад

    So is it vulnerable for cyber attack?

  • @tat381
    @tat381 Месяц назад +1

    If we've seen anything in the last two years i wouldn't be concerned about Russia or china Russia claims about having good weapons showed to bs in Ukraine wouldn't be surprised if china especially since they never had any combat experience and tested there weapons at all

  • @jeseod
    @jeseod Месяц назад

    if there is a plane that needs to vanish it is the single engine f-16.. its old, and if that one engine dies, the plane literally lived up to its name, the flying lawn dart.. I think the F-35 has the same fatal flaw.. one engine is great for weight purposes but when that engine dies, you lose the piolot and a huge sum of money that went into making it fly in the first place. as for the A-10, it still has a vital role in close air support that nothing else has managed to match...
    IMO the planes kept should be(for air orce only):
    1. NGAD
    2. f-15
    3. a-10
    The others had their place and time but thats over now

  • @vladdracul2379
    @vladdracul2379 Месяц назад

    Honestly, I wouldn't be touching anything from Boeing at this point in time. They're proving that they give zero chits to save a dime. I wouldn't trust them to not do the same everywhere they look.

    • @Thatdamnsmith
      @Thatdamnsmith Месяц назад +2

      Thanks for your expert opinion.

    • @vladdracul2379
      @vladdracul2379 Месяц назад

      @@Thatdamnsmith
      They wouldn't need to kill a guy for telling the world they're building chit products if they weren't building chit products....

    • @Thatdamnsmith
      @Thatdamnsmith Месяц назад +2

      @@vladdracul2379 all I said was thank you. Didn’t say anything in particular about the context of your comment.

  • @ericclausen6772
    @ericclausen6772 28 дней назад

    One Ring Controls Them All

  • @markarca6360
    @markarca6360 Месяц назад +2

    In my opinion, they will decommission it, but transfer it to another friendly country, like the Philippines.
    Also, nothing beats the U.S. armed forces in terms of combat experience.

  • @ryanweiss729
    @ryanweiss729 Месяц назад +1

    Oooh boy I remember the "we don't need to dog fight anymore" argument

    • @Markymarkcy
      @Markymarkcy Месяц назад

      In most cases ..you won't

  • @toddyeates271
    @toddyeates271 Месяц назад

    there gonna release 6th generation,f22 was Started about 30 years and old tech by todays standards

  • @harrycee656
    @harrycee656 Месяц назад

    When the ngad is being delivered, the flight goes to space so the battlefield changes again. I understand the need. But imagine what the world would be like if we spent all the money on weapons to advancing humanity instead. But on the flip side, if aliens attack, we will be able to put up a fight.

  • @karlwatson45
    @karlwatson45 Месяц назад

    Love how the US think it will just sail up to Taiwan and then attack China. Dont you think china will sink everything in the Pacific or South China sea that comes within a few thousand miles of china.

    • @shawnjohnson9763
      @shawnjohnson9763 Месяц назад +1

      No. China can't compete. Besides, the US plans to defend Taiwan, not invade China.

  • @jimkluska253
    @jimkluska253 Месяц назад +3

    First, they are not retiring the F22 til 2030. Second. I love the fact rhat china is till trying to catch a plane that was made in the late 80s in competition with another plane that was even more advanced than the f22...(F23). Poor china.....if it wasn't for commie utube....they wouldn't get a mention 😂

    • @eustacemcgoodboy9702
      @eustacemcgoodboy9702 29 дней назад

      China's entire military is designed to defend against attack by America.

  • @jackbland3406
    @jackbland3406 Месяц назад

    WW3 is basically gonna be China, USA and Russia showing off their alien tech with a pinch of genocide 😅

  • @millistiah874
    @millistiah874 Месяц назад

    TL;DR via multiple reports:
    The F22 is stupidly expensive due to its super short production run, theres basically no spare parts. The estimated cost of starting up a new run of them would be roughly equal to just developing and fielding a new fighter jet anyway. The F22's systems are not capable of the data links and interconnections that something from this century is built around, such as the F35. Like it or not the F22 was developed in the 80s, it is painfully out of date. The F22 was built to fight a cold war near peer adversary- one that just does not exist any longer. China is a paper tiger and Russia can't conquer its way out of a paper bag.
    To summarize even further- the F22 is stupidly expensive to field and we have something better that'll be hitting the skies very shortly. The 22 wont be fully retired until the NGAD fighters are already flying next to them.
    And to those who complain about the costs of new fighter jets, adjusted for inflation, the F14 costs more than an F35.

  • @scottstevens2752
    @scottstevens2752 Месяц назад +13

    STOP SAYING CHINA IS TERRIFIED......you don't know, speculation leads to stupidity!!....

    • @lafosh7234
      @lafosh7234 Месяц назад +6

      It’s not the fact they’re scared…it’s just the fact they have absolutely nothing to counter such tech

    • @julesa4529
      @julesa4529 Месяц назад +3

      How do you know they’re not terrified?? Sounds like you need to listen to your own advice lol and if they’re not scared of us then I think they would’ve took Taiwan already.

    • @dabo5078
      @dabo5078 Месяц назад

      @@lafosh7234Of course they don’t. You can’t counter something that doesn’t exist. And with the current US economy I doubt it will ever become real other than another method to scam tax payer money

  • @cheekarp2180
    @cheekarp2180 Месяц назад +1

    F-22 Lighting PC game (decades ago) was the game the woke me up to how powerful a jet it really was. BUT you should see the capability of the new drone fighters, that can pull g-forces that make them appear to stop mid air.

    • @Nitrous-ej5zy
      @Nitrous-ej5zy Месяц назад

      They had F-22 interceptor flight SIM for the Sega Genesis too. I loved that game. And yes that plane was unstoppable. I was 16 when that cam came out.

    • @pike100
      @pike100 Месяц назад

      Are you speaking about the "capabilities" of the drone fighters in a GAME?

  • @joea.golgiri5314
    @joea.golgiri5314 Месяц назад

    Beacuse they have egg fu yong instead

  • @stevenoe6395
    @stevenoe6395 Месяц назад +2

    It was a bad idea to think u don't need a dogfighter in the 60s because it was dint help politics were even more responsible but it hasn't changed it will still need a gun unless it's indestructible lol

    • @davidford3115
      @davidford3115 Месяц назад +1

      Yeah, kind of funny how the doctrinal failures of the F-4 have repeated in the F-35.

    • @stevenoe6395
      @stevenoe6395 Месяц назад +1

      The f4 could still dig fight with the right pilots they did finely get cannons just too late to make a difference same with the f35 one variant has a cannon stealth is it's best defence until someone screws up and let's the other guy get close enough to a pilot that doesn't no better. I just hope the f22 is still around when they figure out there's still going to be dog fights we just haven't had anybody with enough tech yet but ww3 will change that I hope it doesn't happen but we are just human

    • @davidford3115
      @davidford3115 Месяц назад +1

      @@stevenoe6395 I mostly agree.
      The F-4 was a decent plane for what it did, it just didn't do any particular mission well because it was too generalized. And the failure of the AtAs demonstrated why dogfighting skills were still needed. That basically prompted the Red Flag Exercises.
      I see the Air Force top brass making the same blunders with the F-35 that they made with the F-4 in that they are trying to have a general use plane that is less effective overall than airframes dedicated to a particular role. It will become particularly important if the Chinese choose to employ ambush tactics by launching from concealed positions to negate the range advantage that the US is overly reliant on.

    • @stevenoe6395
      @stevenoe6395 Месяц назад +1

      I agree sorry I'm working on our condo that cought on fire February 16 right after my triple aortic dicection I had on February 1st so have a lot on my mind with not being able to do as much work as I would like lol

    • @davidford3115
      @davidford3115 Месяц назад

      @@stevenoe6395 Yikes. I hope things get better for you. Nobody should have to go through that, not even one's worst enemies.

  • @Ghost-ym8iy
    @Ghost-ym8iy Месяц назад

    I think the US Air Force has to come up with a better name than the Ngad

  • @Istandby666
    @Istandby666 Месяц назад +1

    The 35 is and always will be the ugly step child to the 22.
    The 22 is still technologically better than the 35.
    The NGAD will do what the 22 did. Bring a huge leap of technology out to the public.
    We now know what the exhaust on the B-21 looks like. The bottom of the exhaust is that of the F-117 and the top part of the exhaust is that of the YF-23.
    We've now seen pictures of the air inlet without the covering showing the B-21 has 2 engines total.
    As for ME.....I was at Edwards Air Force Base during the testing of the YF-22 and YF-23. In fact, we were program YF-23. A much better aircraft overall than the 22.

  • @hawaiiangunner
    @hawaiiangunner 25 дней назад

    😂😂😂😂😂 I 100% guarantee China knew about this airplane long before you did!!!

  • @LiquidSnake690
    @LiquidSnake690 Месяц назад +1

    We also need to bring back the Battleships.

    • @davidford3115
      @davidford3115 Месяц назад +1

      In theory the museum ships like New Jersey and Alabama are supposed to be able to return to service in two to three months' time. In reality I think it would take much longer to modernize them.

    • @pike100
      @pike100 Месяц назад

      OMG, LiquidSnake, bring back the battleships?!? You must be one of those uninformed, immature fan boys who think that the A-10 should be kept active and also that the F-14 should be brought back!

    • @LiquidSnake690
      @LiquidSnake690 Месяц назад

      @@pike100 Also no I don't think the F-14 Tomcats should be brought back from retirement.

    • @LiquidSnake690
      @LiquidSnake690 Месяц назад +1

      @@pike100 Also I don't appreciate your condescending name calling towards me when I am just making comments and I didn't reply to you warranting getting called names like immature fanboy to begin with.

    • @LiquidSnake690
      @LiquidSnake690 Месяц назад

      @@pike100 I saw in a video that Battleships would be advantageous against an enemy like China because the U.S. Navy could use the Battleships overwhelming firepower to soften up fortified chinese defenses inland. Battleships would be much more effective against Chinese fortified defenses than they were against imperial Japan's underground tunnel networks on Iwo Jima and Okinawa during World War II.