The information she’s providing is clear and coherent, and she is highly well spoken but the accent gives her away. There’s no way you can improve your grammar without losing your accent. Prove me wrong. Still love the video. Good job.
@@wisdom25548 I have reentered litigation and not been able to manage the time for that. But I am trying to make some videos in the coming summer break
Sure, I understand. I will eagerly wait for your videos whenever you are free to create them. Your confidence level in both spoken English and law is impressive, and it leaves a lasting impression. I appreciate your expertise in these areas and look forward to gaining more knowledge and insights from your videos. Thank you for your dedication and commitment to sharing valuable content. I'll be eagerly awaiting your next video. Best regards
THANK YOU MADAM. THE DETAILING OF IRAC IS EXCELLENTLY PUT FORTH IN A SIMPLE AND LUCID MANNER. VERY INFORMATIVE AND GOING TO BE OF EXTREME HELP FROM ACADEMIC PERSPECTIVE AS WELL AS PRACTICAL APPLICATION. LOOKING FORWARD MORE MORE SUCH INFORMATIVE VIDOES.
Mam if one case is given and under that Teacher gave 3questions like ;what claim can be made by A, what argument in return B will make?, How this case can be settled according to You. Are there Q issue if not then How to put them in IRAC??
Wow good Mam... Thanks For enlightening us.. One request Mam please make a video upon FIRAC if possible with both from original and appellate jurisdiction point of view. Thank You
Ma'am, in sajjan singh v state of Rajasthan. I told the prof the rule was that under article 13(2) law means ordinary law and not constitutional law; and that article 368 allows amendment of Consti. But he said wrong answer 😭. Ma'am then what is the Rule in this case?🙏
Dear Ananyaa the main rule in the Sajjan Singh case would be Art 368 wherein the issue was the extent of power of Parliament to amend the Constitution. The court held that Parliament can evdn amend Fundamental rights.
its alwyas the videos by indians that make it clear.great video
Thank you so much. Your comment means a lot😍
@@LegalBanter thank you from South Africa, Cape Town
Wow!! A thousand videos later and THIS one made the light come on BRIGHT!!! Thank you for this!!
Thank you so much for your time. Your comment made my day😀 please keep watching and share
Excellent, well done
Thank you so much @tim sarwar😀
REALLY WONDERFUL AND I FOUND IT VERY RELEVANT AS A LAW STUDENT, THANK YOU
Thank you so much for your time. Hope you keep watching and share it with your friends and colleagues.
Thank you my dear. I learn more from you. I like it so much.
Thank you for your time dear
The information she’s providing is clear and coherent, and she is highly well spoken but the accent gives her away. There’s no way you can improve your grammar without losing your accent. Prove me wrong. Still love the video. Good job.
6:46 rule
8:32 example
9:25 analysis
12:04 example
13:47 conclusion
Thank you for doing this
Excellent of this video give me a good sample and clear, thank you so much
My pleasure. Thank you so much for your time
This is was very well done
Informative
Thank you for your time. Please share it ahead if you found it useful
Mam, keep it up!
Thank you so much for your kind words and encouragement 🙏
@@LegalBanter Mam!
@@LegalBanter Why you stopped making vedios?
@@wisdom25548 I have reentered litigation and not been able to manage the time for that. But I am trying to make some videos in the coming summer break
Sure, I understand. I will eagerly wait for your videos whenever you are free to create them. Your confidence level in both spoken English and law is impressive, and it leaves a lasting impression. I appreciate your expertise in these areas and look forward to gaining more knowledge and insights from your videos.
Thank you for your dedication and commitment to sharing valuable content. I'll be eagerly awaiting your next video.
Best regards
I love this video. It make IRAC simple to understand.
Thank you so much @james 😊🙏 do check out my other videos too and share with your friends too!
This was really helpful thank you so much😊🙏
Thank you so much for your time 😊
Very well explained..thank u
Thank you😀
Really informative video ma'am! Thank you so much!✨
Thank you for your time ❤
This was great. Thank you so much
Thank you for your time. Please do share ahead😀
THANK YOU MADAM. THE DETAILING OF IRAC IS EXCELLENTLY PUT FORTH IN A SIMPLE AND LUCID MANNER. VERY INFORMATIVE AND GOING TO BE OF EXTREME HELP FROM ACADEMIC PERSPECTIVE AS WELL AS PRACTICAL APPLICATION. LOOKING FORWARD MORE MORE SUCH INFORMATIVE VIDOES.
Thank you so much lakshmi for your time and your feedback 😀
@@LegalBanter My pleasure mam !!☺️☺️
@@lakshmipraseedunithan9434 please share it forward with your peers and friends too if you liked it. thank you
Very informative and helpful! Thanks for this video :)
My pleasure😀 thank you for your time
USUFUL INFORMATION 💐
Thank you so much 😀 please share it forward
@@LegalBanter Present I'm Writing 3 Sem, IRAC concept is Very Helpful.
This is great. I hope my video helped. Please watch my other videos and do tell your friends about it too😀
@@LegalBanter sure madam..If any doubts I'll contact you..
Sure. Happy to help
Thank you so much for this 🙏
Thank you for your time! Please share it forward if you found it useful
Need more videos regarding NCA exam questions
Hi dear could you please elaborate what is this NCA exam so I can plan video for the same? Thank you for watching too
Really useful, thank you!
Thank you so much for your time 😀
Thank you!❤️🕊️
Glad you liked the video Nilesh. Keep watching n keep sharing 😀
Thanks so much
My pleasure. Thank you so much for your time
Amazing video ma'am!!!
Thank you😀
Mam if one case is given and under that Teacher gave 3questions like ;what claim can be made by A, what argument in return B will make?, How this case can be settled according to You. Are there Q issue if not then How to put them in IRAC??
Wow good Mam... Thanks For enlightening us.. One request Mam please make a video upon FIRAC if possible with both from original and appellate jurisdiction point of view. Thank You
Thank you so much Jaisal😀sure
You explained really well 👍
Thank you so much zainab for your time and your feedback. Happy to be of help 😊 keep watching legal banter and tell your friends and colleagues too!!
Okay mam... I wish examples with corporate law 😀
Sure. Will make another one using corporate law examples
Ma'am, in sajjan singh v state of Rajasthan. I told the prof the rule was that under article 13(2) law means ordinary law and not constitutional law; and that article 368 allows amendment of Consti. But he said wrong answer 😭. Ma'am then what is the Rule in this case?🙏
Dear Ananyaa the main rule in the Sajjan Singh case would be Art 368 wherein the issue was the extent of power of Parliament to amend the Constitution. The court held that Parliament can evdn amend Fundamental rights.
Or it could also be the Seventh (amendment) Act whose constitutional validity was challenged in this case
Thanks ma'am 🥰
Hope i knew and understood better in 1st year. Would have fetched me more marks :P
😀😍