This is what happens when you clock your memory on Ryzen to 4000Mhz. The results are inconsistent due to WHEA occurring in the background. This affects the FPS avg as you periodically will get random stutters and dips in fps which in most cases will go without notice. The 5600 will by far dominate over the 5500, but in these tests the margin are 5-6 fps difference.
@@rattlehead999 There's no such thing as a GPU Bottleneck, god so tired of internet troll tech channels throwing out terminology like they understand what it means.
No, this person was testing at max settings on some of the latest or hardest to run games. This is what their 3080 could do an thus FPS differences will be marginal.
@@thebritishviking ya it's never the GPU, even a low range entry level graphics card like the Radeon RX 6400 is still faster than any CPU because of how many RPM's it processes every second, but im not sure what the deal with the 5600 shown in the video. i have the Ryzen 5 5600, and my fps is way higher than what the 4100 and 4500 showed here. the 5500 is part of the 5000 series, even though they released it kinda late, but i can see that one being a little closer to the 5600. the 4000 series was kind of a disappointment, i went from the first gen Ryzen 5 1600x to the 5600, and that was definitely an upgrade. that being said i don't think these CPU's are the best fit with a RTX 3080 or RX 6800 XT, there best paired with a RTX 3050, 3060, RX 6600, that could also be another reason they were so close in fps. the Ryzen 5 5600X could probably do a better job with the 3080, but even that CPU would be better paired with something like the RTX 3060ti or Radeon RX 6700 XT. the Ryzen 7 5800X would be a good fit with a 3080. i have the Ryzen 5 5600 paired with the RTX 3060, and they mesh pretty well together.
The ryzen 5 5500 is better value I think, it´s costs only a few percent more. I have bought I prebuilt last month with the 4500(the 5500 would have cost me 40 Euros more and the 5600 100 Euros more, that was too much for me and not worth that much money). If had built it myself I would have take the 5500(for just 6 Euros more) or the 5600(for about 40 Euros more. The prebuilt was quite a bargain, I got the 4500 with a rx 6600 xt for the same offer price like a 5500 with a rx 6600(684 Euros with shipping) and 2 free games.
@@hartmutdietz1228 to say it’s like 3-5 FPS on average it’s not worth getting the 5500 over 4500. The left over money you’ll have from buying a 4500 can be used to get a better cooler n u can just oc the 4500
I will say this, three of these CPUs were slammed by professional reviewers and critics, especially the 4500. And yet, the little three showed in this video that they were able to hang with 5600 with no issues. I think that there is a big disconnect between said reviewers, and normal, everyday people who are looking for a decent CpU at a great price, and can use the 4100, 4500, and 5500 with no problems. Thank you for this video!
Quick FYI, while the AVERAGES may all be roughly the same, the frame times will not be. With the weaker CPU's like the 4100 and 4500 you will get a good deal more stuttering over the 5500 or 5600. That being said it's really not a super substantial stuttering unless you really care about FPS in like E sports titles or something.
This is how CPU testing is supposed to be. Going with a lower end GPU can bottleneck the CPU. If that happened then you’d see the FPS of all the processors being pretty close to the same with smaller variables.
idk I still can't get over that fact you got rtx 3080 12gb. Don't get me wrong, its kinda chaotic, will you get same fps with like gtx 1050 type beat ? or will it be significantly lower... so yeah... In my opinion it should be kinda balanced gpu and cpu for tests (please correct me If Im wrong, so I could understand it better)
@@Phinnigin it's actually the other way around, those CPU's were holding the GPU back. these CPU's are best paired with a midrange graphics card like the RTX 3060 or Radeon RX 6600 XT, if you pair the Ryzen 7 5800X that's a different story, because now GPU can show it's full potential. the Intel i5 11400 would hold a RTX 3080 back, but the i7 11700 8 core would not.
@@Jeymez I understand but that's not what we're testing, we're testing for CPU speed, NOT GPU, so it doesn't matter how low the GPU usage is now the performance is only based off of the CPU, also ion know how accurate this vid is FYI.
@@Phinnigin that is what im talking about, i know it's about CPU speed, but using a high end GPU on two midrange CPU's will achieve an inaccurate result. you saw how hard the CPU usuage was being used trying to keep up, that being said it does show some difference between these two CPU's, but if you use the RTX 3060 in this test, that would show a real result. the i3 12100 is newer and has newer tech, but it's still just a 4 Core CPU at the end of the day. the Ryzen 3 4100 is a refresh 3100 but with slightly less cache, but both of these CPU's are more capable of pairing well with the 3060.
i was actually deciding between the ryzen 3 4100 5 4500 and 5 5500 but the 3 4100 and 5 4500 hold up rlly well sometimes thje 3 4100 beating the 4500 and 5500 by a few frames
I seriously doubt these are legit, you're saying that a 4/8 zen 2 CPU has the same performances of a Ryzen 5600, which os false The 4100 is basically a slight refresh of the 3100
@@TomasGaleano there the same actually, but some benchmarks show the 3100 beats it in games by a few fps, but other benchmarks I've seen show the opposite. i do remember alot of people being disappointed with the 4000 series at the time, but the 3000 series was quite a jump from the first two Ryzen generations. the 5000 series is basically what the 4000 series should've been, but is basically a further improvement on the 3000 series. that being said, there's only so much you can improve the series when there all part of the same AM4 platform. i think AMD got in it a rush because Intel started fighting back, competition is good for everyone, but competition can also lead to mistakes. they enjoyed some small success thanks to the early days of Ryzen when Intel refused to change, but they got ahead of themselves after awhile. the 5000 series really should've been for the next platform, but they dropped the ball on the 4000 series. now there is one positive, it does give people more options, but right now wouldn't be a good time to upgrade when Intel's 13th gen is not that far off, and AMD's new Zen Platform with AM5 is said to come.
2024, utilizando un R5 4500, es a mi parecer el procesador mas barato y con un buen rendimiento, para quienes desean jugar a máximos gráficos sin ir mas lejos de los 60fps. Ya les digo, pueden ir por una 4060-4070, y jugar tranquilamente a 60fps, 1080p, gráficos ultra.
Wise choice for Ryzen 4500. What a joke Ryzen 5500. In my country, Ryzen 4500 $110 and Ryzen Ryzen 5500 $153 and performance almost identical. Just meh 5500. This prices from July 2022 - September 2022
Im your country it´s the better choice that is right. In Germany the difference is only between 6 to 16 Euros. For 6 euros more the 5500 is the better choice,.
Same in my country the ryzen 5 4500 is much cheaper than 5500 and its a beast at that price. 10,499 INR For 4500 rather than 15,000 INR for the 5500 lmao
el test no es correcto, al utilizar la calidad ultra la rtx esta haciendo todo el trabajo, por eso no se ven diferencias, con una tarjeta mas acorde o unos settings menores se vera realmente las diferencias
O que você disse não faz sentido. Em um teste de processadores, é melhor que todos os processadores sejam o limitador, pra que entreguem o máximo que podem. Se a GPU for o limitador, todos os resultados serão iguais.
si haces eso el limite de FPS lo va a poner la tarjeta gráfica, por lo que todas tendrian los mismos FPS y a los procesadore les va a sobrar poder de procesamiento
Because he used ultra settings, and only used budged cpu's that are close in Clock speed. The results are not wrong, just uninformative. It means that when you use high or ultra settings, these cpu's are not for you. (even if you have a 4090 TI double OC) Had he used lower settings then this would have been more helpful in determining the scalability with lower end graphics cards. Since lower settings just push out 2-3 times more frames, thus the differences would be more noticable. I'm thinking of buying the 4500, or save a little longer for the 5600 for bandwidth reasons and re-sale ability. 5600 is smart but exp now, 4500 is 60$ cheaper but also worth less later.
This is what happens when you clock your memory on Ryzen to 4000Mhz. The results are inconsistent due to WHEA occurring in the background. This affects the FPS avg as you periodically will get random stutters and dips in fps which in most cases will go without notice. The 5600 will by far dominate over the 5500, but in these tests the margin are 5-6 fps difference.
I can feel my brain melting reading these comments.
Seems like something is wrong here, you'd think a 5600 could get a lot more out of a 3080 than a 4100.
Not when the GPU is the bottleneck.
@@rattlehead999 A 3080 is not the bottleneck here wtf
@@rattlehead999 There's no such thing as a GPU Bottleneck, god so tired of internet troll tech channels throwing out terminology like they understand what it means.
No, this person was testing at max settings on some of the latest or hardest to run games. This is what their 3080 could do an thus FPS differences will be marginal.
@@thebritishviking ya it's never the GPU, even a low range entry level graphics card like the Radeon RX 6400 is still faster than any CPU because of how many RPM's it processes every second, but im not sure what the deal with the 5600 shown in the video. i have the Ryzen 5 5600, and my fps is way higher than what the 4100 and 4500 showed here. the 5500 is part of the 5000 series, even though they released it kinda late, but i can see that one being a little closer to the 5600. the 4000 series was kind of a disappointment, i went from the first gen Ryzen 5 1600x to the 5600, and that was definitely an upgrade. that being said i don't think these CPU's are the best fit with a RTX 3080 or RX 6800 XT, there best paired with a RTX 3050, 3060, RX 6600, that could also be another reason they were so close in fps. the Ryzen 5 5600X could probably do a better job with the 3080, but even that CPU would be better paired with something like the RTX 3060ti or Radeon RX 6700 XT.
the Ryzen 7 5800X would be a good fit with a 3080.
i have the Ryzen 5 5600 paired with the RTX 3060, and they mesh pretty well together.
the ryzen 5 4500 is a great budget CPU right now. sep 14 2022 you can build a new pc with a used rtx 2060 for $500 WOW!!!! 💖❤
The ryzen 5 5500 is better value I think, it´s costs only a few percent more. I have bought I prebuilt last month with the 4500(the 5500 would have cost me 40 Euros more and the 5600 100 Euros more, that was too much for me and not worth that much money). If had built it myself I would have take the 5500(for just 6 Euros more) or the 5600(for about 40 Euros more. The prebuilt was quite a bargain, I got the 4500 with a rx 6600 xt for the same offer price like a 5500 with a rx 6600(684 Euros with shipping) and 2 free games.
@@hartmutdietz1228 to say it’s like 3-5 FPS on average it’s not worth getting the 5500 over 4500. The left over money you’ll have from buying a 4500 can be used to get a better cooler n u can just oc the 4500
@@hartmutdietz1228 no
@@hartmutdietz1228 no it's much costlier than 4500 in my country
I will say this, three of these CPUs were slammed by professional reviewers and critics, especially the 4500. And yet, the little three showed in this video that they were able to hang with 5600 with no issues. I think that there is a big disconnect between said reviewers, and normal, everyday people who are looking for a decent CpU at a great price, and can use the 4100, 4500, and 5500 with no problems. Thank you for this video!
Quick FYI, while the AVERAGES may all be roughly the same, the frame times will not be. With the weaker CPU's like the 4100 and 4500 you will get a good deal more stuttering over the 5500 or 5600. That being said it's really not a super substantial stuttering unless you really care about FPS in like E sports titles or something.
something wrong with this test, its more like gpu fps test rather than processor.
This is how CPU testing is supposed to be.
Going with a lower end GPU can bottleneck the CPU. If that happened then you’d see the FPS of all the processors being pretty close to the same with smaller variables.
Nope.
RTX 3080 already powerful for those processor.
GPU absolutely bottleneck at this point.
@@devonjohnson8536 yes identical.
But, for live streaming, 4500 best budget ever.
Oh damn, i liked my Ryzen 4500 for now. Only $110 in my country.
idk I still can't get over that fact you got rtx 3080 12gb. Don't get me wrong, its kinda chaotic, will you get same fps with like gtx 1050 type beat ? or will it be significantly lower... so yeah... In my opinion it should be kinda balanced gpu and cpu for tests (please correct me If Im wrong, so I could understand it better)
He's using a more powerful gpu to so that you get 100% out of the CPU, just to see it's full potential.
@@Phinnigin thank you so much:) now I understand.
@@Phinnigin it's actually the other way around, those CPU's were holding the GPU back. these CPU's are best paired with a midrange graphics card like the RTX 3060 or Radeon RX 6600 XT, if you pair the Ryzen 7 5800X that's a different story, because now GPU can show it's full potential.
the Intel i5 11400 would hold a RTX 3080 back, but the i7 11700 8 core would not.
@@Jeymez I understand but that's not what we're testing, we're testing for CPU speed, NOT GPU, so it doesn't matter how low the GPU usage is now the performance is only based off of the CPU, also ion know how accurate this vid is FYI.
@@Phinnigin that is what im talking about, i know it's about CPU speed, but using a high end GPU on two midrange CPU's will achieve an inaccurate result.
you saw how hard the CPU usuage was being used trying to keep up, that being said it does show some difference between these two CPU's, but if you use the RTX 3060 in this test, that would show a real result. the i3 12100 is newer and has newer tech, but it's still just a 4 Core CPU at the end of the day. the Ryzen 3 4100 is a refresh 3100 but with slightly less cache, but both of these CPU's are more capable of pairing well with the 3060.
i was actually deciding between the ryzen 3 4100 5 4500 and 5 5500 but the 3 4100 and 5 4500 hold up rlly well sometimes thje 3 4100 beating the 4500 and 5500 by a few frames
R5 5500 with gtx 1650 4gb vram or r5 4500 with gtx 1650 6gb vram??? Who is the best among them?
r5 4500 with gtx 1650 6gb 👍
since when 1650 got 6 gb, btw the cheaper is the better for pocket, so its r5 5500
r3 4100 and r5 4500 is the same?
No
Better get the r5 4500 because you'd be able to actually have more things open in the background, which is more realistic.
@@rattlehead999 For this more important RAM than CPU
@@СергійЯценко-ю2о but r5 4500 is hexacore, have 6 cores 12 threads.
Is a lot better than r3 4100, and its Ryzen 5.
La mayoria de los juegos solo utilizan 3 o 4 nucleos por eso el rendimiento es similar
What is the point of testing these CPUs with a GPU that was obviously NOT designed to run on them?
To avoid bottlenecking the cpu my guy. If they use equivalent GPU people can't see the difference in performance
It's called benchmarking
(8gb ram)What is better to play an 11th generation i3 with integrated graphics or a ryzen 5 4500u with integrated graphics?
hmmm amd
for the love of God when testing CPUs do it in a CPU bound enviroment, ultra settings are NOT it
can u try with low setting o a rx6600?
Crazy test. Ryzen 4100 almost the same of Ryzem 5600.
No. These tests are flawed.
so you know that's not possible
@@TechnologyHive I think this guy just types random numbers
@Natalie-vv9jl I'm pretty sure too. Those numbers are way off.
Jamas se utilizan todos los nucleos del CPU en los juegos
He's only share graph test result.
Not the actual fps in game (msiafterburner)
I seriously doubt these are legit, you're saying that a 4/8 zen 2 CPU has the same performances of a Ryzen 5600, which os false
The 4100 is basically a slight refresh of the 3100
I would even doubt the 4100 can defeat the 3100
@@TomasGaleano there the same actually, but some benchmarks show the 3100 beats it in games by a few fps, but other benchmarks I've seen show the opposite. i do remember alot of people being disappointed with the 4000 series at the time, but the 3000 series was quite a jump from the first two Ryzen generations. the 5000 series is basically what the 4000 series should've been, but is basically a further improvement on the 3000 series. that being said, there's only so much you can improve the series when there all part of the same AM4 platform. i think AMD got in it a rush because Intel started fighting back, competition is good for everyone, but competition can also lead to mistakes. they enjoyed some small success thanks to the early days of Ryzen when Intel refused to change, but they got ahead of themselves after awhile. the 5000 series really should've been for the next platform, but they dropped the ball on the 4000 series. now there is one positive, it does give people more options, but right now wouldn't be a good time to upgrade when Intel's 13th gen is not that far off, and AMD's new Zen Platform with AM5 is said to come.
@@Jeymez cuando?
@@Jeymez Como?
2024, utilizando un R5 4500, es a mi parecer el procesador mas barato y con un buen rendimiento, para quienes desean jugar a máximos gráficos sin ir mas lejos de los 60fps.
Ya les digo, pueden ir por una 4060-4070, y jugar tranquilamente a 60fps, 1080p, gráficos ultra.
I take 3060ti with r5 4500 its good?
unreal ! 4500 vs 5600 is small difference ,it will be same with a rx6600?
Все правильно сделал, кто там дизлайки ставит, ни чего не понимает в этих тестах.
согл
Well when the gpu is doing most of the lifting it is hard to see what the cpu is actually capable of 😂
The point on the GPU doing everything is exactly to show how much can the CPU keep up with it
Wise choice for Ryzen 4500.
What a joke Ryzen 5500.
In my country, Ryzen 4500 $110 and Ryzen Ryzen 5500 $153 and performance almost identical.
Just meh 5500.
This prices from July 2022 - September 2022
Im your country it´s the better choice that is right. In Germany the difference is only between 6 to 16 Euros. For 6 euros more the 5500 is the better choice,.
Same in my country the ryzen 5 4500 is much cheaper than 5500 and its a beast at that price. 10,499 INR For 4500 rather than 15,000 INR for the 5500 lmao
Спасибо за тест видеокарты!
what 1% low FPS means?
Esperaba más diferencia con el 5600 que tiene más cache, además de ser 5000.
Saludos
el test no es correcto, al utilizar la calidad ultra la rtx esta haciendo todo el trabajo, por eso no se ven diferencias, con una tarjeta mas acorde o unos settings menores se vera realmente las diferencias
@@auri166 👏👏
@@auri166lo que pasa es que este es un test más realista, nadie en su sano juicio va a comprarse un 5500 o 5600 con una 3080 para jugar en mínimos
as far as i know, all of these processor has almost the same performece
Конченный тест с нарисованным фпс
Sería interesante probarlo con una tarjeta más acorde a sus potencias, por ejemplo con una rtx 3060 ti para ver como rinden.
Si haces eso todos van a tener el mismo FPS💀
O que você disse não faz sentido. Em um teste de processadores, é melhor que todos os processadores sejam o limitador, pra que entreguem o máximo que podem. Se a GPU for o limitador, todos os resultados serão iguais.
si haces eso el limite de FPS lo va a poner la tarjeta gráfica, por lo que todas tendrian los mismos FPS y a los procesadore les va a sobrar poder de procesamiento
Thank you for your video, it was very useful
For the server 5500 ideal 4 gaming 4500 !
r5 4500 last seen sold by amazon fo $70 as of jn 2023.
bros doing this test with a 3080 😂🤣
all these number almost the same, that's not possible
Because he used ultra settings, and only used budged cpu's that are close in Clock speed.
The results are not wrong, just uninformative.
It means that when you use high or ultra settings, these cpu's are not for you. (even if you have a 4090 TI double OC)
Had he used lower settings then this would have been more helpful in determining the scalability with lower end graphics cards.
Since lower settings just push out 2-3 times more frames, thus the differences would be more noticable.
I'm thinking of buying the 4500, or save a little longer for the 5600 for bandwidth reasons and re-sale ability.
5600 is smart but exp now, 4500 is 60$ cheaper but also worth less later.
R3 4100 wins. 😁
no
@@gersonrodrigues8286 Actually, R5 4100 win, not R3
This test is not R3
You're deluded kid
@@MusicandGame23r5 with 4 cores? 😂
@@bikes_nom_nom Yep
Unlikely realistic test.
We want to see bottleneck percentage.. not fps.. this test most likely for gpu test.. not cpu test .
Como se sabe eso?
Ye dunno why ultra settings
Ryzen 4070 wins🤫🧏♂️
PIOR VIDEO QUE JA VI TUDO MENTIRA NAO CONFIEM
Ths for sharing.
Grazie al cazzo con una Rtx da 12 GB vedi bene anche con FX 6300😂
non hai capito che sto benchmark fa letteralmente cagare
Fidati... Sulla 6300 la 3080 manco parte🤣
When r3 5100?😀
Specs
Base clock: 4.0 ghz
Boost clock: 4.4 ghz
6nm
L1:512kb
L2:2mb
L3:16mb
Tdp: 60w
Am4
Pcie 4
Ddr5 5200mhz
5300x
Base clock: 4.2 ghz
Boost clock: 4.7 ghz
6nm
L1:1mb
L2:2mb
L3:16mb
Tdp: 65w
Am4
Pcie 4
Ddr5 5200mhz