Это видео недоступно.
Сожалеем об этом.
Bears, Beets, & Being Kind
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 мар 2024
- Watch the full episode with Rainn Wilson: • Rainn Wilson on a Star...
Follow Rainn Wilson: / rainnwilson | soulboom.com | linktr.ee/rain...
Follow Andrew Yang: andrewyang.com | / andrewyang
----
Subscribe to Forward:
Apple - podcasts.apple...
Spotify - open.spotify.c...
Listened to this episode twice. Plenty of things we can glean from the full episode! This is a great summation...
Yang gang 2024
Yang gang!
For life!!!
Will you run for president again?
Hope's eternal!
Hope's eternal!!!
He better. If not this election, then next one. This nation needs him more than ever!
He's focusing on the third party, its probably until 2028@OGPimpin
@@esaucordero7011 You're probably right
Star Trek was about the wonder of nature, not the awe of spirituality. It was about people who were able to adapt, grow, and create because their thinking, their attitudes were scientific. As it celebrated our connections with nature, it set aside notions of separate spirit worlds.
If there was a higher power out there, science would be very interested in finding it. It is the religious that hold us back in this endeavor as they think they already have the answer. Science is the process for questioning everything. Dogma are answers that cannot be questioned. They are opposites. Religious people can put aside their dogma and do science, but then they are not being very religious.
When we refuse to admit we could be wrong, then we refuse to grow. This is why echo chambers and yes men are dangerous, and a temptation the powerful must resist. Atheism is starting line instead of a false finish line, and some are further down the path of self-improvement than others. Faith and probability are two sides of the same coin, both grounded in calculated expectations built on data or desires. When you're confident the sun will rise or that a person will act predictably, you're essentially playing the odds. When either fails you, you are not shocked because you thought it was impossible, but because the expectations derived from your data were incorrect, shaking your foundational understanding of how things should work.
Religion is gasping its last breaths, and figures like Peterson are administering the lethal dose. In the Muslim faith, the term 'kafir' (often equated with atheism) serves to ostracize the outsider. Yet such labels invariably turn inward, becoming weapons against those within the faith who dare to dissent. In their eagerness to take on atheism, some theists shift their stance, only to find themselves at odds with their own brethren over what their faith even means. All religions are the same this way, it is basic tribalism. You do not need an imaginary, abusive friend to see the wisdom in kindness and selflessness. Making the world better for others makes it better for one's self. The irony is, every inadequate answer given to a questioning believer strengthens our cause. Religious adherence is crumbling, not because of science's triumph, but because its own contradictions and failed answers are tearing it apart.
Open the pages of the Bible, and you'll find a quagmire of ethical confusion and sheer depravity. Between endorsements of slavery, genocide, and misogyny, are the faint whispers of love and compassion. Theists cherry-pick these texts from an atheist moral stance (free from preconceived notions) and then use the remaining passages to justify actions that fall short of true humanist morality. This selective adherence to scripture unwittingly acknowledges that morality evolves beyond the stagnant pool of religious dogma, being shaped instead by human experience, empathy, and rational thought. It lays bare the hollow core of religious moral authority, replaced by values that echo our shared human decency. Why cling to an imaginary, abusive relationship when the simple, selfish act of improving the world for others inherently makes it better for oneself? Unlike the faithful, atheists don't need to consult an imaginary friend to know that murdering one's child is fundamentally wrong.
Potus Harris now
The idealism of Star Trek was a lot easier to swallow back in the 70s. Good luck convincing a zoomer that Science/ rationalism/atheism will bring about peace on earth.
It's not atheism that makes the future in Star Trek better.
After realizing the profound implications of spooky action at a distance which means all is one in the universe truly and any world of timelessness all exist at once Singularity AKA God AKA The Big Bang is all encompassing and completely alone this is a kaleidoscope reality where the singularity can go to forget this fact and Surround itself with other versions of itself. Stay within the ultraviolet and green which represents the future and the now or the positive and the flow red is the past and UltraViolet is passionate positive blue is less passionate positive... red is the passion.