I need to disclose something…
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 июл 2024
- Check Masterplan here: www.musikhack.com
► MIXING & MASTERING: whiteseastudio.com/
►THOMANN AFFILIATE: whiteseastudio.com/thomann
►SWEETWATER AFFILIATE: whiteseastudio.com/sweetwater
►PLUGIN BOUTIQUE AFFILIATE: whiteseastudio.com/boutique
►Become a member: / @whiteseastudio
INDEX:
00:00 Intro
00:27 I'm not a plugin tester!
01:13 Is it easy to make a plugin?
01:59 The two reasons...
06:21 Musichack
07:14 The deal
08:20 I don't agree with this!
10:12 The plugin
13:13 Plugindoctor...
14:47 It's like a car!
15:14 Oversampling and Aliassing 
Хобби
Haha! Being a software developer with a lot of corporate experience, I can verify that this is spot on. It's actually sometimes quite hard to swim against the current at corporates and try to achieve sth for the end user. People will literally fight you if it suits their carreer. You can see this in any industry though, not just the plugin industry.
Or snob
Analog Obsession is an example of what one passionate person can do.
+ Neural Amp Modeler!
Love his plugins they are fantastic I can also mix a whole track just using guitar rig 6 lol and fabfilter pro L2 on the master I love using racks add snap heap on top of it and you got a solid option
I like his stuff too but some of the plugins make FL Studio crash sometimes. Since the newest release of FL Studio it's probably still bugs on FL's end.
i couldn’t find myself sticking with any of his stuff. and i got most of it. i always found a similar plugin that was a lot better in my opinion. for example the brit channel vs the Lindell 80 channel. its just a better neve than the ao one
@@natedavid3873 I started using strictly guitar rig 6 and just pro L2
I’m impressed. I was a recording engineer in the 80’s and progressed to mixing and mastering in the 90’s, and I feel like this plugin is doing its job correctly. It’s including all of the fundamental functions the way they would be getting applied when these sciences were originally being invented and innovated upon.
It then wisely makes use of everything genuinely better that the digital realm has brought to the table, not the least of which is the automatic gain-balancing that’s being applied in at least these key stages in which they have included it.
As has been pointed out, with two hands this was always an option in the analog realm but is impossible with only one mouse, and there is simply no reason to omit this in a digital processor.
Of all the “instant master” plugins that have cropped up in recent years, several of which I own, this one presents itself with a structure that most closely resembles a professional mastering chain, while maintaining the simplicity that we have just seen demonstrated.
Yeah, I’ll get this despite having paid for others because tools are tools and better is better. I don’t marry myself to others just because I paid for it, I’ve got work to do.
If I’ve done professional level mastering, why would I want a simplified product like this?
Because I’m not always acting in that capacity. More and more often I’m in the role of producer, so I’m working with the musicians more closely and that demands my time and my focus. I want something that is acting as a simplified version of the real deal, not something targeted at those who have not yet learned their way around the top-tier tools and techniques. This way I can spend just a quick 5-minutes at the end of the session day and punch up a polished sounding rough mix for people to take home with them.
I have yet to see the video but this reads like a really educated opinion. Thanks for your eloquence and enthusiasm for a product that seems to live up to its promises.
Dane… as one who has recorded with some of the greatest recording engineers (some who also mixed)… Armin Steiner, Tom Dowd, Peter Kelsey, etc I feel my songs and vocals were made easier due to the skill these folks presented in a session. Thus, “progressed” can mean several things, I’d say in the scheme of things, what goes down during the session (and overdubs) are where much of the magic happens… or SHOULD happen. My engineers were like an assistant producer more often than not.
Plugin is 🔥. Use it on all my beats
Would i need this if I have izotope master assistant?
@@Rio-uv1gs Yes! There is a A/B comparison video on RUclips about it. Not even close
I really liked the way you approached this video. The deal you made with them was pretty clever. It's a win-win scenario for everyone involved (if you're serious about making good stuff). Thanks a lot!
Dan Worrall has already won the loudness war. 😂
Integrity is a virtue. Thank you for doing what you do!
Master Plan is a wonderful plugin to and in my ears. I intensively tested the demo version before I bought it and am very happy. It has taste and style, and each function, knob or slider makes sense. Interestingly it‘s rather hard to do some REAL harm to the signals you feed it. In my opinion this is quite a sophisticated tool.
I appreciate your ethics and honesty. I value your opinion very much because I feel you can be trusted. Keep up the great work.😊
Welcome to my life hahaha!!! I'm a tester for SEVERAL plugin developers. Some large and some small. It's not easy work lol. I have a different experience, I find a lot of my feedback usually ends up making it into the release, heck a few of my ideas have developed into full blown plugins but I do understand where you are coming from. As a consumer when I write into customer service to the companies I don't work with nothing even happens and I have found some pretty big issues to say the least. At the end of the day I really enjoy testing plugins and giving feedback on the tools myself and my colleagues will use day in and day out to help make great records. Great vid! Looking forward to checking out the plugin. I won't use it in my work but I'll still check it out and if I like it I will gladly support the company.
as someone who co-founded a software company then grew it up and then got it acquired by a large company i can tell you that yes, when you are in the startup phase the passion and being responsive to the clients is paramount and the center of the world, but when you join a larger org, it's too easy to say that feedback is dismissed or ignored and that it's all about promotion is not nearly a nuanced enough perspective. i've been in the driver's seat this whole process in my company and when we were acquired we were primarily left alone for nearly a year but then what starts happening is there starts to be competing interests within a large org, and depending on how good you are at managing product and expectations (we are mostly good at it versus mostly bad) drives a lot of the outcomes as development continues. so yes, it's easy to say big companies are just out to "screw" people out of their money, that is, i believe, highly flawed and again not complete and lacks the actual real nuance that reflects reality.
For anyone curious, the song used in this video is Sandstorm by Darude
We at NoiseWorks are indie developers and you still reviewed our product and were positive about, so thanks again for that :). While its nice for large plugin companies, it was a gamechanger for us when you uploaded your video about GainAim.
This plugin sounds decent, I noticed the "thick" knob working well and that multi-band feature is cool. Also really nice to see the Lufs on the bottom.
As a former graphic designer, I think it could use a bit of a design update like a smaller "Master Plan" logo that is easier to read and less distracting and maybe adding your own logo somewhere small to help promote your brand? Also to be an extra details snob, I noticed the "Low", "High" & "Wide" words are a little off center LOL. Not a major issue but something like that would annoy me to see every time I open the plug-in.
Best of luck Musik Hack, I think you have a great plug-in in the works and as always great video White Sea Studio!
Love the video - lots of details and in-depth / behind the scenes. Great!
I know what you mean
but the “loudness war” thing on the website is actually quite funny.
Yeah. I took it as a kind of tongue-in-cheek joke =]
I already placed you in my quality control and risk assessment protocol when buying plugins and in general about which companies to look into for products. This video proves me right about that decision. I love your videos. I always do my best to purchase through your links, and when I can I leave comments with the companies about your videos being why a person like me, who develops Grammy winning artists, from your region I might add, decides to go with a product. I pay for everything. No freebies. I have your back always. Keep it going.
Can you explain what is flawy at the DMF plugin doctor? 00:13:19
This version of sandstorm is quite the hotline bling interpolation.
OHHH YEAH!!! The new hi-res logo in the intro is really worth the time you spent to remaster it! Now the circle... IS A CIRCLE! Well done! :P
9:30 this is a point I often have to bring up with clients if they use something like the loudness penalty analyzer. Loudness is something that should always be intentional in both mixing & mastering. Particularly with certain genres, like a lot of metalcore, edm & modern hip hop, for instance. We are all used to hearing them with very little dynamic range. It's to a point where it kind of just sounds "wrong" if you don't make it as loud as you reasonably can.
I actually can say there are some artist featured plugins, that are in my opinion completely worth their money, for example Nicky Romero's Kickstart 2, Infected Mushrooms Wider, Dada Life's Sausage Fattener & Endless Smile. So they sat together with professionals, or Serum/Cthulu which became very popular by deadmau5, because he worked with Steve Duda on it and thus plugins took a long procress to create and mind about the issues that may occur. So yeah, I use these plugins pretty often, they're simple to understand, expect Serum, they are minimalistically designed and everything does, what it's suppossed to do, without any real deep issues in the backhand. So yes, creating plugins nowadays can be very easy and FL Studio has got the Patcher, which allows you to create own tiny plugins within FL which can be used for mixing, autotune, sidechaining, kick creation, etc. but here's the thing: they are not that versatile enough to span a wide range of flexibility and versatility to be used in a mastering or mixing process for a good result. Some of these plugins may cause big problems in the gainlevel, or cross the Nyquist, or no proper anti-aliasing happens, probably some phase issues can even be the worst of all results and yes not many people have got the time to write music and sit down and learn code to create an own plugin for the market, that does what's supposed to do, for example coding an accurate limiter. In Patcher you can take a preset and use it on the busses, but the frequency response might be sometimes work more differnt, as you aimed to, so yes long story short: Plugins can safe tons of time, but the downsite is that most plugins have got issues in their coded structure and telling the companies to rework plugins in a different perspective or further change interfaces probably makes them ignore but aware of their issues, but they got no knowledge to fix them...
Great job, man. I'll try it for sending mix samples to clients, but I'm pretty sure that I'll master "the long way" if I'm asked to master a track.
Superb video. Thanks for your input, relevant as always! Cheers
I downloaded the trial. I’m at a point in my recent project where I needed a flavor and this app totally does the trick! I’ll see how I feel about it tomorrow but, for today, this thing is the bees knees!!!
My dude, love the channel. Mildly obsessed… a thought: I’ve been building the Sound Skulptor analog 500 series kits for a few years, and I find them extremely useful for imparting analog into my tracks. I think it might be good for your viewers to give these a review as “budget analog gear if you can solder” (not hard, learned how on my first kit without issue). Keep doing what you do: prevent me from buying trash!
I have made purchases from your advice , and it has served me well . Thank you
I wonder how many companies employ a doctor of mathematics to do advanced DSP research compared with ones that just combine existing code in new ways and focus on the UX to differentiate themselves from the competition.
I think between 1 to 3 companies do this 😅
@@Whiteseastudio Mean, but I like it. 😄
If it wasn’t for the people reviewing these plugins these companies would take advantage of people.
Is this plugin worth it?
@@Rio-uv1gs have not tried it
Love the transparency of your approach and appreciate you put in the double effort for making two videos. Would you consider this approach for other products as well?
Maybe
I learned more from you about handling plug ins than from anyone else on RUclips
I like the idea of this video and I like how you approach things. Hey, I know you just uploaded a video of the plugins that you actually use, but I'd like to see a video that shows the plugins you'd actually use if you went completely in the box. I know you might never go 100% in the box, but if you did? Would a video about that be possible?
Whats the latency on this?
Absolutely! I've experienced this myself through my interactions with plug-in developers. As always, your insights are appreciated and spot on!
Ok. I guess someone need to clear things up about why super loud needed in dance music. I prioritise dance music here because the main clients of plugin makers actually are bedroom dance music producers. Simply because this type of producers dominate at the moment want it or not.
And why loud mixes are important in dance music. Because if bedroom producer will mix a track at -1 dbtp and -14 lufs then when this track will be mixed by DJ straight after any track made by established producer who mixed a track at -1dbtp and -2 lufs (yes) it simply will be alot quieter. And no one going to play this track. You can not simply turn the volume up as usually clubs allow 2 yellows on Pioneer DJ mixer (3dbtp). But why established producers mix their tracks so loud? Its just sound better in clubs. And at the end of the day its a club music.
song name?
Good video. Just had a look at the plugin looks interesting I like their blurb 👍🏼🏴☠️✌🏼
Totally agree. Elemental Audio Systems had some insanely good products (Equim, Firium, Neodynium), and then Roger Nichols Digital bought them, more than doubled the price, and the products disappeared.
one of your best videos. as a developer trying to learn dsp and plugin development this really helps
Please do a semi full rundown/test/review of the Analog Obsession stuff!
Hey Witse, ik zie graag naar je video's, maar wil een supper klein opmerking maken, ik grijp telkens naar mijn volume knop als de intro opkomt. (ik heb ook meestal een hoofdtelefoon op)
I prefer this interface to other all-in-one mastering plug ins I have seen and used
Question: How would you feel if I took a bunch of your clips, and took a stab at creating a musical song from it?
It's kinda a new hobby of mine. My first time around, not as well as I thought, but I'm hoping that each video I create is better than the last.
Go ahead :-)
Lol, you going to auto tune his voice into a mad song? Just take the bits where he stands up from his chair and walks around in disbelief 😋💜
@@matthewfearon lol.. That would be funny.
@@GTSongwriter Are you going to do the "Snaking oil plugin song" ?😂
@@MarcosRobertoDosSantosJF That's an idea. 😊
Wonderful piece.
Seems like a great plugin! I probably won't but right now because I definitely have enough to work with. Also- thanks for using good music to test the plugins! A lot of RUclipsrs use awful EDM and it makes me unable to pay attention (because I quickly turn it off).
This is so right! What I love more is when those RUclipsrs introduce their "testing" of the plugin with the legendary: "Here is a track I'm working on lately" and the very track is just a collage of awful EDM loops picked here and there.
I still use a few decades old Waves plugins. They’re still holding up.
FWIW, Tukan Is one guy and he released an entire suite of VERY respectable plugins (reaper only), completely free, in one year. He did all of this BEFORE AI Came along that could write code for you. He has also been very reliable with bug fixes and updates tons of new features and entire second versions to some products. And BTW, I'm not talking about barebones stuff with no interface like Airwindows (all due respect), but good looking and highly functional GUIs.
And I do mean a full suite, not just the basics. You have basic digital clean compressor and the likes,but also hardware emulations like LA-2A (2 versions), 1176 (3 versions), at least 4 different delays and at least 3 reverbs, console emulations, meter strips, noise gates, signal to noise ratio meter... The man is an absolute legend and frankly, the rest of the industry should be embarrassed, and channels like this one should be paying much more attention to his work.
I let them turn mine down now, I just go for the best balanced loudest I can do without going into the distortion /flat zone where it’s washed out. But in the learning curve of mixing. The absolute “worst feeling “ there is is having the perfect mix ………..and after it’s out and on Spotify it sounds “quieter” then everything else
Thank you for your commitment to provide quality audio engineering education
So cool tune, great video.
very nice Thanks !
ok but now we want see your pink suzuki !! 😄
This would be useful for DJs to cleanly level-match their set lists.
Good video and great track for the demo. Who is it?
I think any limiter plugin should have upto 16x oversampling, atleast. For something expected to be primarily used as the very last bit of processing in the entire processing chain, over-and-above, if not even the optjon of overkill, sampling should be standard.
While there is certainly some correlation between quality and and success, it is by no means absolute. Not even close. So while I respect the mindset (and my approach is to focus on quality as well), I do not believe that that necessarily translates into making money. Turns out you are more likely to get what you aim for! If you aim for money, you'll get money. If you aim for quality, you'll get quality. But while we're talking about the slight correlation between quality -> money, there is also a slight correlation between money -> quality. Obviously, with more money, you have more resources that CAN be invested in quality. I'm afraid it's not all as simple and good as we'd like it to be. But great to know you're driving a pink Suzuki!
Great video! Does anyone know the name of the song?
sandstorm by darude
@@mafgar i knew it sounded familiar
100% agree with you. I test and review plugins too along other stuff on my channel, and even if i'm small i get lots of hate from some devs who doesn't like my HONESTY, and from a dev in particular i see him time to time on a famous forum to post a video i made (a negative one) to throw their followers against me with vary bad comments full of hate and insults. And i'm not big by any mean, i'm just someone who believe in respect for viewer and honesty in general. Some of them may be used to pay influencers or whatever and they get mad when they find someone who is not for sale. To me it's just a kind of medal of honor, cause i do what i do for passion not trying to milk money from companies, and when something is good is good, but when is not... as you told we come here with tests and "proof" of what we are saying... something they don't really do
There is something that needs to be added to what you are saying.
Software development, especially when is low level, can be extremely expensive.
A competent low level developer with strong skills and experience will cost you in the hundreds of thousands per year and for good reasons. The fact that the plugin industry is pushing for crazy low prices is one of the reasons why there is virtually no space for improvement, since improving a product you already sold is a cost with no return for a plugin manufacturer and the company won't have a major income injection until the next product is released, which brings a lot of pressure in buisness planning.
The solution to this issue, theoretically, are subscription models.
I am not gonna argue that subscription models are perfect and that there should be a forced switch to them like Waves tried to do (with their deserved shitstorm)... but as a senior software developer with many years of experiences in software product development and maintainance, I can guarantee it's the only buisness model that makes sense for sustainable software quality.
The fact that the industry started to push prices toward the 30/40$ per plugin in the last 5-6 years is a major reason why most plugins get so little improvement over time. Despite i benefitted a lot from it as a home studio producer, I think it was an unconsiderate overstretch, and I suppose it made working environments for audio developer very toxic over time... but I have no experience in this industry so maybe I am wrong.
The problem with FabFilter is that their plugins are far too expensive. Prices like that can usually only be justified by being total niche products (since only few copies will be sold), not by the quality of a product, since a good quality product with appeal to a large audience will sell a lot. So for me they are among the most unethical companies around since they could easily charge far less (like Valhalla DSP for example) and be much more accessible to musicians who can't simply afford to spend >150€ on one single plugin.
I fully agree on your statement about wars. Thanks a lot for that!
Can’t say anything yet about the tested plugin. I will try it but for now the price is again something that I’m not willing to pay for something that has lots of cheaper alternatives.
The logic of this comment isn't too sharp.
First off, companies should charge what they think their products are worth. If you are able to create a plugin that excels in every category, nothing wrong in asking some dough for it. Have to remember that price always has an effect on the way us consumers view a company or brand. Fabfilter caters for professionals and the price is what you'd pay for a tool that never fails when deadlines are pushing hard.
Fabfilter as a company obviously borrows a trick or two from Steve Jobs-era Apple, where they've focused first and foremost on GUI design. It is flawless. Other is the sound quality, which is also such where it's impossible to make anything sound bad. It's creamy. Then there's relentless beta-testing: I can't remember ever getting a FF-plugin to crash, let alone causing any problems in opening a song/project. Last but not least, every plugin does what you want with a couple of clicks BUT has depth that goes so deep you'd need a studio diving suit and an oxygen tank to get to the bottom.
This all screams premium, premium, premium. Fabfilter deserve every dollar, period.
P.S. : It's the only company who could design the ultimate EQ plugin. Classic of classics, I would argue it's the best plugin ever, period. It's like they designed the kitchen knife all over again.
You can't compare how prices for hardware are calculated (since there is a cost for manufacturing every unit and premium usually means higher costs) with prices for software (no matter how well written the code is, copying it costs the same). It doesn't matter if a software is being sold 100 times for 10 € or 10 times for 100 €. So justifying software (!) prices with “premium” is pointless and you should be careful with insulting other people's logic if this is you sole argument.
@@AnthonyMcBazooka Hardware, software, snake oil, petrol oil. Doesn't matter. If it is something, anything, that gives value to a customer and they think it is worth the asked price, they can ask for it.
Just because the other doesn't have reproduction / manufacturing costs doesn't mean you couldn't ask a "premium" price. A Fabfilter product probably has had thrice the cost of development than a ValhallaDSP product. Thus, the price has been well calculated.
If I think about my copy of Fabfilter Pro-Q 3, it works so seamlessly with my Apple Magic Mouse that has smooth scrolling, I could never ever mix as fast with any other EQ. This means it has already paid off multiple times.
FabFilter plugins are fine, no doubt about that, I don't think there is any need to discuss this aspect.
And yes, they can ask whatever they want for it and if enough people are willing to buy it for that price, good for them. In the same way, Waves can totally ask for money for their update plan if enough people are willing to buy it. Yet people have the right and good reasons to complain about both.
The thing is, the calculation for a software developer for getting their development costs back is simply how much do I need and how many copies can I potentially sell. If they can sell 900 copies for 50€ or 300 copies for 150€ and they make the decision that the latter, it means that they make the conscious decision that it's more important to them to be elitist than accessible. And I am pretty sure that FabFilter do like to have this image, knowing that their customers also prefer being elitist, going around and tell everyone how superior their plugins are. And I think that stinks. And you won't change my mind about it this way.
@@AnthonyMcBazooka I don't think anyone thinks their elitists. Fabfilter are simply a known brand in modern audio. If I think of "elitism", I think of Universal Audio and their pricing. There's your cult right there.
Fabfilter plugins are simply essential. In chef-language, they just replace your old rusty knives with something that doesn't ever need sharpening.
There are a lot of "one-stop-shop" mastering programs out there, and if you need to master a lot of tracks in a hurry, these will probably get the job done. I prefer something like Izotope's Ozone or Newfangled Audio's Elevate as they give you a good amount of control over things like dynamics, compression and EQ. It's all about your workflow.
Winning the Loudness War? Everyone knows that Dan Worrall already won it!
You might like Woodman’s Immaculate Maple Syrup Studio plugins especially the “Woodpressor”. Independent plugin creator and they are super high quality.
that sorta deal you made is perfectly ok, kinda became a beta tester 😊
I'm curious, do you really mastering songs at LUFS -14? And none of your clients complains? And where can I find some examples of your master?
There's absolutely no reason to master at -14 LUFs. You can only submit one track to most distribution services so you just submit something loud and let them turn it down (all streaming services are different too).
Whiteseastudio.com/listen
@@Jazzguitar00 I know about it, and that's why I left this question...
@@Whiteseastudio Well... I don't know this artists. I'm far from undermine their music, but it's interesting that, in my opinion, the albums of the most of well-known big "names" in this industry is far beyond than LUFS -14. By the way, do you see these videos on RUclips about how streaming services works and explain why matching in LUFS - 14 is pointless?
The emulated tape bloom was reasonably realistic.
I wish you would upload your videos to a lossless platform like vimeo or something like that. Maybe doing it for subscribers/patrons. I watch the videos on my studio monitors on a fairly well treated acoustically room on the 4k setting and I barely perceive differences when you tweak knobs and faders on plugins. RUclips's codec really sucks. Love the videos plz keep on making them :)
I was thinking about floatplane or something 🤔🤔
@@Whiteseastudio keep us updated!!
@@vitormarxmemes glad someone raised this issue it's been bugging me for years, not just your channel, Wytse, but others as well where the host is going on about some perceived audio difference in shootouts or other reviews and I just don't hear it. So I blame my ears or equipment, but have come over time to realize that unless I was sitting next to you, I'm just not hearing what you're hearing in your set up. So I have to just trust your comments, but only in extreme cases does anything break through where I can really hear what you're talking about.
airwindows...... 'hold my synth'
Yourself and Dan Worrall are by far the most knowledgeable and interesting people on RUclips. Love your content, always!
I have such a mixed bag of views on Acustica…You should make a video on their “Gold Pro” DBX recreation
I generally like independent guys why? Because usually there's only a guy doing and they try to work better. Airwindows for example, he tries to do it well. May not be perfect but he listens to people.
absolutely
16:54
open-source os supremacy
I THINK IT CAN BE USED BETTER ON A SINGLE TRACK THAN IN THE WHOLE MIX....
Much respect for this video…
Thanos for transparency.
It is a first time i actualy like the music in one of your vids.🤙
This is a cool plug-in.
Without doubt Sonible are at the top of my list with plugins. I used to torrent plugins, but with Sonible I can’t help but pay. The smart EQ3 in my opinion is the best plug-in of all time.
I used to spend a day EQing an acoustic guitar, these days it takes 5 seconds 🤣. The group view for spectral mixing or whatever it’s called is incredible.
Better than proq3?
@@austincelaya1139 if I could only have one I’d have proq3 but I still have many good uses for smarteq3
@@austincelaya1139 I have proQ3 as well. I still use it later on, but if I could just have 1 plug-in I’d go for smart EQ3. Simply because of the time it saves. It great to avoid ear fatigue.
why do you think plugin doctor is flawed? I'd love to see you do a video on it!
In theory all e in unity gain unless you are specifically going for a sound that happens by not using it in unity gain , the whole industry n the 70‘s and 80‘s was basically about „misuse“ of equipment to get a „unique sound
When I have to use proQ3, proMB, proL2, ds1-mk3, drawmer1973, spl, tube tech, and unisum for mastering, then this all in one plugin will not impress me. lol.
You could work as a (paid)consultant tester. Of course is difficult to review the same product afterwards. But if you do it transparent , that would be ok for me too ...
Neural DSP are prime example of this... Fantastic initial products, but are just releasing the same re-packaged 'artist' versions to continue to fund their faltering hardware dev for the Quad Cortex. Meanwhile, Apple silicon users are stuck using their 'innovative' products without native support for over two years. Then any negative comments/requests are basically met with... '..it's really hard' 🙄
I love this, just wish you would use a less click bait like title for for video. In my opinion click bait titles lower the content value of a product. And your product is good you don’t need that.
Unfortunately, I have all the data pointing towards clickbait being better for my content 😑
🎉
Side bar…. Nice track!
Dan Worrall won the loudness war, we all know this
To develop a really high quality audio processing algorithm, I think most of the effort needs to be spent on testing. You can have an idea, usually a tweak to one of the textbook algorithms that everyone (secretly) uses, and maybe it will sound good. But to know how it sounds on different kinds of audio, to get a feel for how the parameters affect the sound, that takes a long time!
On top of that, DAW and OS compatibility testing is huge. Any DAW can easily misbehave or do something unexpected, causing a plugin to crash if it’s not paranoid about the inputs. Exhaustive testing is impossible but you have to try.
UNITY GANG!
„And again, everything is gain compensated“
I can only guess what the flaw was
That was actually in there already
Ah ok, it’s always funny to see you being enthusiastic about gc. :D
Anyways, always great to see good educational content and companies that actually care.
Dank je wel!
thank god... i was afraid you'd tell us, that the sandstorm was a lie..
👍
Waves has left the chat.
Not always if you create something good money will appear... It is far more complicated issue in my opinion.
Snake Nail.
very pretty nails bro
You're wrong about plugin doctor But it Ok nice video 🙃
It absolutely is wrong sometimes. I remember someone showing a plug-in doctor readout that was saying something crazy like the UAD Manley vari Mu is -20db at 100hz, which just isn’t the case.
It seems to give false info sometimes, maybe that’s user error, not sure.
Ima a analog person …and try not to use plug ins at all
Seeing Dan Worral going +6dB, on the master, I chose not to participate in any 'loudness war" whatsoever, lol
That was an amazing MIC DROP!
Ik stel voor dat we de tongbreker "plugin industry" vervangen door "plugindustry". Bekt wat beter 😊
Goeie!
As a native New Yorker (Nuyawka) Dutch, to me, sounds like what a German speaker sounds like when speaking English after living in Staten Island for too many years. Lol🎉
This unity gain you speak of .....🤔.