Rahul Kanwal has developed the very bad habit of interrupting his guests right in the middle of a sentence. A poor interviewer. His questions are too long and he ends up taking more time in asking questions than he gives his guests to answer them. Total buffoonery.
The host acknowledged problems with China but he didn’t know that India has bigger domestic and international problems than those of China. His world view explains why India falls behind China in most aspects.
Conversion of interests and understanding of each other instead of trust and personal relationships is the foundation, well said. The guy should get educated as well. By the way, show your respect and don’t interrupt.
Yes, I noticed this India guy was rude and impatient. Cut in before Prof Kishore Mahabuni could finish his speech on India and China relationship. He seemed to be very negative about China.
@eduardoangeles9876 , might your views have been influenced by the imperialist need to divide in order to conquer? Not accusing, just questioning because I got a very different impression of him.
I think this commentator Rahul is unprofessional and rude. Let your guest finished the sentence before you interrupt. Anyway this guy Rahul is also anti-China from the way he threw out stupid questions hoping Kishore to talk something negatively about China.
Mahbubani: India China border over some barren rocks is not important. The global interests of these two countries are important. Anchor: Selling the "Scary Northern Dragon" story to the Indian public is how we media get paid.
@@rka-truthalwayswins5127 lol... Do you realise you are brain washed? Tibet has been part of China since the Yuan dynasty. And everyone knows how the McMahon line came about.
@@chriswong9158 Not necessarily.. Some people become legends and Kishore is one of those very few people on the globe so a site doesn't matter that much!!
Wasting time talking to this TV host who is so ignorance , arrogant and with fixed mindset of just pushing everthing should be in India's favour. What a biased fellow.
You must understand that many BRICS nations are ideology opposed to one another. Some are Capitalist, others are Communist, some are Socialist, while others are dictators.
Many are your economic rivals. Your competitors. So for instance, India exports wheat, but so does Russia. India exports rice, but so does countries like China and Brazil.
Professor Kishore is a legend, he has been living and working in Singapore that he understands Chinese people and thought very well, including China. He seemed to bear the brunt of buzzingly noise for the first time
Rahul is not professional as a newsman. He is overtly nationalistic and he suffers from severe confirmation bias. His usual trick-of-trade is to put across his own thesis in different ways to his interviewee and tries to strong-arm his interviewee to confirm it. In this interview, Rahul tried so many times to get The Hon. Ambassador Kishore Mahbubani to confirm his thesis that China is crumbling, China came begging to India to sign this truce, China is desperate for Indian markets, etc. The Hon. Ambassador's rich experience as the former President of the UN Security Council and Permanent Secretary of Singapore's MFA shone through. He was calm and balanced, patiently but firmly swatting away those nationalist pretensions and explained why the de-escalation is in the strategic interests of BOTH countries. Of course BOTH countries benefit from lowering tensions and improving cooperation. Why would India sign this truce if China is the main beneficiary? As for the truce - In the end, cooler (and wiser) heads in both countries prevailed. Kudos to the wise and mature leaders and diplomats of India and China.
That host has another agenda in his interview. It sounds like he's saying that working toward peace is untrustworthy and that building on mistrust is challenging. WTF??!
In fact China is one of the most trusted countries. Their deeds matches their words most of the time. You can't say the same for US whose leaders often say one thing but do another.
Yes, Chinese follows Confucius which stressed on being righteous. That's why business deals were done based on spoken agreement. It is very different to the values from the west.
I hope this is the last time Mahbubani agrees to be interviewed by this guy. This guy is prejudiced and biased, speaking as if India is the saint and China is the devil in this bilateral relationship
India and China have thousand years of unfading civilization. Together, they can make the world a better place to live. China now happens to be the number two following the US hegemony and inevitably becomes the US hit target. But if this number two happens to be India, the US will not hesitate to do the same. Hope India will not get carried away by the sweet words of the West.
Our media stuck in BJP , congress,AAP hindu , Muslims and caste politics in international level geopolitical they scratch their head they didn't have any idea .
This media guy super naive, hugging each other seems to define closeness of friendship,as an optic yes, but don't bet on it!And not to forget Chinese culture, hugging is not comfortable practice of the Chinese people,even among husbands and wife. Hugging is more a western norm. You can bet your last dollar Chinese is about respect and giving face to each other. Maybe Indian leaders like Modi,hugging for politicians are for the camera, that one is equal.
Was it also the convergence of interests when India aligned itself with the Five Eyes rather than the region? What India needs to reflect above all is sincerity. If Indians in Singapore can reflect sincerity and rise above, then I do not see why Indian in India cannot. India just has to choose the right leaderships
So you a nobody knows more about India & the leadership than Indians who voted leaders in power which is something in existent in China & corrupted in USA/Europe??!!
You don't become suddenly friends, friendship grows slowly and there are many factors involved in estsblishing a friendship. One of the very important factor is "trust".Mutual trust.Unconditional trust.
The host looks like shellshocked not expecting what the answers he got from Kishore. He is not really nationalist he just a brainwashed by western interests.
Mahbubani is in a class of his own. The interviewer is injecting his rookie ideas unto this intelligence and giant of a Diplomat. Settle down and control your emotions.
This is the first time I’m watching this host and he is such an emotional wreck! He lets his ego about being ‘Indian’ get to him, that he doesn’t listen to what Prof. Mahbubani is fully saying. He seems to be such an anti-China hater. Prof. Kishore Mahbubani is a fellow Singaporean and I’ve respected him and his writings for many years. He speaks with great care and diplomacy. If the average Indian and Indian media journalists like, Mr Rahul keep up their inflated and indignant ego about being Indian and being perpetually offended by China; then they will remain stuck in that vicious cycle of never MOVING FORWARD! It will be of their own doing. As Prof Mahbubani said, diplomatic relations rise and wane, but the most important thing to do, is to start with the latest/ newest starting point and move forward to make amends and improvements in the bilateral relationship. Prime Minister Modi is a great and strong leader. He wants to take the great nation of India to the next level. I believe China is happy for India to keep rising. As a Singaporean, I would like to see both India and China become powerful, secure and friendly towards each other.
I think any interviewer should gives the interviewee chance to discuss his or her feelings about the interview. The interviewer should not interrupt or project his or her feelings to the interviewee. People whose are watching the interview, want to understand every answer given by the interviewee.
I hope people understand the fundamentals beneath the surface of the India China Border issues: 1) India China Border issues are GOOD for India. It creates a "security narrative" to keep India united. Nothing unites a people better than an overwhelming external threat, no matter how real that threat is. 2) China won't invade India. Conflict yes, war no. It is quite simple. India and China are separated by a HUGE WALL. China knows India cannot come over the WALL to invade China. And India knows China cannot sustain the logistics of supporting an invading army coming down from the WALL. They need to face billions of Indians on the plain. Not possible. 3) The armed conflict in 1962 is just that: an armed conflict. India wants to "Look North" (aka, squeeze and squat into South Tibet) and China confronted India with an iron fist. But there is no war. China quickly retreated because, again, there was a serious logistics issue to sustain its force on the other side of the WALL. 4) But India would use this minor 1962 armed conflict to create a security narrative that there is a "Scary Northern Dragon" ready to invade India. So, we Indians need to be united and fight that dragon! With this narrative, the Indian government can distract its people from domestic issues, when the needs rise. Indian military will use this security narrative to squeeze for more government funding. Indian media will use constant reporting on this scary neighbor to get more views. "China Threat" becomes an industry for many people. Of course we cannot give up this industry for "peace." Peace won't make money. Scare does. 5) More than four years ago, Modi gambled that Trump would be in office for yet another 4 years, and even more years if his VP win after he leaves the office. So, Modi instigated a border conflict with China, expecting that China was in the middle of a trade war and tech war with US, and it would make concession to India. But the plan backfired. China swiftly gave India a bloody nose. Worst yet, Trump left office right after, and Biden had not provided more FDI and friendshoring to India, just empty talks in QUAD. As result of the border conflict, India's thriving economic cooperation with China suffered greatly. The Chinese imports, including finished products, components, chemicals and heavy equipment continues to enter India, as India's GDP growth depends on them. But there is no infrastructure and manufacturing ecosystem corporation between India and China. This lack of cooperation contributes to the stagnated Make In India progress. India's manufacturing percentage in GDP actually dropped, not grown, since Modi took office. 6) At the end, Indian people lost. Instead of riding on the rise of China, Indians are constantly pulling back and forth about this China Threat, which results in chilled economic relationship with the biggest manufacturing nation on this planet. It is time for a change. Thus, you see the thawing of India China relationship, with the BRICS meeting as the catalyst. From China's perspective, as long as India sits on the fence, not completely siding with US/EU camp, it is GOOD ENOUGH. So, China smiles to India. India smiles to China. A new beginning. But for how long?
Not just "middle of a trade war and tech war", but also midst a serious pandemic of what was then a deadly novel virus. To india, this was a moment when the stars & planet all aligned, so to speak. But like you said, it turns out to be a mistake.
That host is preempt with war mongering and anti China attitude. He wont take no as an answer. On the other hand, Prof Kishore is highly intellectual and patient.
Your guest is right,India is thinking of five years while China is long term.China’s century of humiliation didn’t confine in mainland but overseas Chinese suffered greatly as well.we were treated like dirt.
If India insists on having the last say, it will retard the Asian century progress. India immediate needs are to develop the economy fast and steady which require a sustained period of political stability. Singapore professor is right that foreign relation is built on convergence of national interest not blind trust. Current good relations with US is no exception. Because of one party rule, China has very long term Plan. Hopefully India does not miss the current rate opportunity for greatness by short term gains.
Terrible hosts instead of letting the guest talk, non-stop depicting the negativity of China to position the guest to criticise China. If both countries(India & China) compromised, they must have concluded the benefits of working together. Don’t think the agreement is just initiated from China alone due to their economic downturn, India has even bigger issues - large poverty, good logistics infrastructure, stable electricity & supply-chain, etc. 🤔 Perhaps, India needs China
the interviewer has tonnes of ego ,, he should climb down and allow his guest to explain his views ,, otherwise he come out as somebody who is fixed on making his point of view rather than allowing his guest to give his views freely ,,
Deputy Secretary of State Curt Campbell summed it up this way, "India cannot be counted on as US ally." it doesn't take a genius to decipher that. does it? the gig is up for Modi.
Really experienced guests in this topic .l see kisor sires other podcast he well known how countries in the world work. Thanks to india today for bringing him.
This Rahul guy appears to a fool and no journalist. The poor fellow has to re learn basics of journalism! He tried to act more loyal than the king attributing a lot India has never said officially. He must learn to restrain himself and try to get useful analysis from great scholars like Kishore Mahbubani. Not try overwhelming them like this guy tries to!
If China and India could get along with each other then what Kishore told was right when during a speech he told that if China and India could manage a working relationship that will benefit both
What do you expect? A love fest between them? Of course, it is a "convergence of interests." Politics 101: Any first-year college student can tell you that; one does not need 50 years of political experience to discern that.
Don't Indians listen to their Leaders speeches on what Agreements they make and their reasons? Don't they understand? Why should Indians and others try to understand it from reporters or medias views according to their interpretations? And it is not the job of reporters or medias to determine the geopolitics of a country unless directed by the Govt. of the day. Who rules the country and have the power to decide geopolitical strategies?
There are border disputes between China and India,both countries should address these issues,America should not be allowed to use India as its soldiers in America war on China,Taiwan is integral part of china just like Andaman is part of India,this fact is recognised by America and India,even then America is supplying weapons and soldiers to Taiwan,this is equivalent to sending weapons to terrorists in Kashmir,north east of India,do India encourage?
The anchor needs to explain why India decided to change its maps including places that are in China - but India likes to forget its own actions and pretend everything is 'unexplained.' Excellent to see the great Kishore Mahbubani -- shame about the interviewer.
5 minutes into the interview is all that I could stomach seeing how mediocre and unprofessional Rahul is as an interviewer, and otherwise a huge waste of time saved by Kishore’s wisdom. Rahul reflects the general ignorance and blind nationalism of the Indian population thinking that it is China that crawls to India for help. The fact is india is unable to protect its investors in manufacturing industries and many had left! Its many anti China moves had horribly backfired on itself, amongst many other failures, and the rest it’s not hard to see now who needs who more.
INDIA AND CHINA ARE NEIGHBOURS. INDIA UNDERSTANDS THE HUMILATIONS CAUSED BY THE WEST TO CHINA AS THEY ALSO SUFFERED THESE SAME HUMILIATIONS CAUSED BY THE WEST.cooperation is better then unneccesary conflict
Mahbubani is right is emphasizing relation rather than trust as the guiding principles of geopolitics. India need to come out of the trauma of the thousand year rule of India by Muslims as the impediment in its relation with China.
Can India trusts US??? The professor is right that it is the convergence of interest that pull countries together. India n China has more interest with convergence possibility than between India and US.
The world has become a board game in which: USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead. Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead. China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
Does this journalist work for CNN or Fox News by any chance?? That what his interviewing style reminds me of. Also, how dare he interrupt his excellency Mahbubani??
![[#2024MAMA] ROSÉ (로제), Bruno Mars - APT. | Mnet 241122 방송](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/dgGqD28J6aQ/mqdefault.jpg)
the interviewer is more about prove himself right than give the interviewee the platform. Classic NPD.
Rahul Kanwal has developed the very bad habit of interrupting his guests right in the middle of a sentence. A poor interviewer. His questions are too long and he ends up taking more time in asking questions than he gives his guests to answer them. Total buffoonery.
Absolute!! He thinks he is the next wonder of the world!! Total leftist buffoon!!
You are absolutely right, That's what I was thinking, Man he's interupting.
Problem with most Indian journalists is that their thinking is very narrow range and tries to bring the guest in their line...
Rahul Kanwal is disqualified and should expelled. I will never ever watch his program anymore!!
@@westharbourcity1131 80% of Indian journalists are colonized coolies sold out to the west!!
The host acknowledged problems with China but he didn’t know that India has bigger domestic and international problems than those of China. His world view explains why India falls behind China in most aspects.
👍👍👍
Rahul , please control your emotions and behave more professional as new agents
A hawkish journalist trying helplessly to understand the reality of politics.
A stupid journalist trying to be smart!!
Contrast between a great mind and a small mind.
Conversion of interests and understanding of each other instead of trust and personal relationships is the foundation, well said. The guy should get educated as well. By the way, show your respect and don’t interrupt.
Yes, I noticed this India guy was rude and impatient. Cut in before Prof Kishore Mahabuni could finish his speech on India and China relationship. He seemed to be very negative about China.
Modi hugs most of the leaders, xi only hugs Putin, guess putin has better relationship with who
The host is debating rather than interviewing. He is a terrible journalist.
Totally agree
@eduardoangeles9876 , might your views have been influenced by the imperialist need to divide in order to conquer? Not accusing, just questioning because I got a very different impression of him.
@@eduardoangeles9876 If world peace depends on people like the journalist, there will be no hope!
Motor mouth clown you can find many in endia
I completely agree. Terrible interviewer. He is not really listening to all that Prof. Kishore Mahbubani was saying.
I think this commentator Rahul is unprofessional and rude. Let your guest finished the sentence before you interrupt. Anyway this guy Rahul is also anti-China from the way he threw out stupid questions hoping Kishore to talk something negatively about China.
He is not necessarily anti China but works for western interests as almost all of Indian English media!!
He also lacks any sense of manners
@@navinasimoes : Yes
He got a big mouth with a small brain...anti China you find in endia medias, political circles
@@defaultname9766 👍👍👍
Great to hear insights from Kishore Mahbubani sir
He is truly a living legend 🙏
Just look at the Indians reporter, the way they talk. That's Indians characters and attitudes
NO!! It's that stupid reporter ONLY!!
Spot on
Mahbubani: India China border over some barren rocks is not important. The global interests of these two countries are important.
Anchor: Selling the "Scary Northern Dragon" story to the Indian public is how we media get paid.
Well Said 👍👍👍
IF SO, Kishore & especially his government should request China to leave those rocks & even Tibet Now !!
@@rka-truthalwayswins5127 lol... Do you realise you are brain washed?
Tibet has been part of China since the Yuan dynasty.
And everyone knows how the McMahon line came about.
@@rka-truthalwayswins5127 : Then India should leave Sikkim.
@@royloh-rq3ci BS!! Sikkim is Indian & always was!! Even great parts of China have been Indian and/or belonged to the Indian civilization!!
The host is such a fountain of misinformation is makes your head swirl.
Agree 👍
Host is an idiot, prejudiced and uneducated
Mine spinning...
Where did they source their anchor??
Naive reporter. Waste of time for Prof Mahbubani
So true!
So true!
No!! Kishore is way more mature & he made his point convincingly!!
@@rka-truthalwayswins5127 Prof Mahbubani could had done this in another site... it was a waste time
@@chriswong9158 Not necessarily..
Some people become legends and Kishore is one of those very few people on the globe so a site doesn't matter that much!!
Wasting time talking to this TV host who is so ignorance , arrogant and with fixed mindset of just pushing everthing should be in India's favour. What a biased fellow.
@@mikewong8500 not biased but unfit to be a tv host with such arrogance. Really a pathetic Indian.
You must understand that many BRICS nations are ideology opposed to one another. Some are Capitalist, others are Communist, some are Socialist, while others are dictators.
Many are your economic rivals. Your competitors. So for instance, India exports wheat, but so does Russia. India exports rice, but so does countries like China and Brazil.
Professor Kishore is a legend, he has been living and working in Singapore that he understands Chinese people and thought very well, including China. He seemed to bear the brunt of buzzingly noise for the first time
@@scsay7606 should add he was born in Singapore
So living and working in Singapore is a qualification for understanding China well.. very logical indeed.. 😂
My friend, Kishore was born in Singapore. He's a Singaporean.
Rahul is not professional as a newsman. He is overtly nationalistic and he suffers from severe confirmation bias. His usual trick-of-trade is to put across his own thesis in different ways to his interviewee and tries to strong-arm his interviewee to confirm it.
In this interview, Rahul tried so many times to get The Hon. Ambassador Kishore Mahbubani to confirm his thesis that China is crumbling, China came begging to India to sign this truce, China is desperate for Indian markets, etc.
The Hon. Ambassador's rich experience as the former President of the UN Security Council and Permanent Secretary of Singapore's MFA shone through. He was calm and balanced, patiently but firmly swatting away those nationalist pretensions and explained why the de-escalation is in the strategic interests of BOTH countries. Of course BOTH countries benefit from lowering tensions and improving cooperation. Why would India sign this truce if China is the main beneficiary?
As for the truce - In the end, cooler (and wiser) heads in both countries prevailed. Kudos to the wise and mature leaders and diplomats of India and China.
Absolutely right. He ends up taking more time in asking questions than he gives his guests to answer them.
@@garethl738 he is like a kindergartner who only knows what he wants .
Rahul has to grow up
@@surinderchowdhury - in other words, Rahul is a bit of a gas bag.
Indians are great talker, they believe they are the number 1 in this global world and will not accept they are inferior to others.
The host is annoying, no matter how much kishore explained, he still insists on his inexperienced view of geopolitics.
That host has another agenda in his interview. It sounds like he's saying that working toward peace is untrustworthy and that building on mistrust is challenging. WTF??!
India did not even win an Olympics gold metal, what can Brics expect from India, Hopeful it doesn't make trouble for US is a pleasure.
How much you've support of the BRICS+ for all members are equal partners.
In fact China is one of the most trusted countries. Their deeds matches their words most of the time. You can't say the same for US whose leaders often say one thing but do another.
Cough, Cough..!! Tibetans, Mongolians, Philippines. India & many, many others DO NOT agree with that statement!!
Yes, Chinese follows Confucius which stressed on being righteous.
That's why business deals were done based on spoken agreement.
It is very different to the values from the west.
Good joke!!
I hope this is the last time Mahbubani agrees to be interviewed by this guy. This guy is prejudiced and biased, speaking as if India is the saint and China is the devil in this bilateral relationship
This is debating not interviewing, this guy is so impulsive trying to overcome prof. with his bias mentality.
India and China have thousand years of unfading civilization. Together, they can make the world a better place to live. China now happens to be the number two following the US hegemony and inevitably becomes the US hit target. But if this number two happens to be India, the US will not hesitate to do the same. Hope India will not get carried away by the sweet words of the West.
Our media stuck in BJP , congress,AAP hindu , Muslims and caste politics in international level geopolitical they scratch their head they didn't have any idea .
😂
Kishore can see the future! Really amazing guy.
This media guy super naive, hugging each other seems to define closeness of friendship,as an optic yes, but don't bet on it!And not to forget Chinese culture, hugging is not comfortable practice of the Chinese people,even among husbands and wife. Hugging is more a western norm. You can bet your last dollar Chinese is about respect and giving face to each other. Maybe Indian leaders like Modi,hugging for politicians are for the camera, that one is equal.
Oh! Ye.. Chinese husbands & wives don't hug!! They became a billion+ people by breathing air!!
Totally Agree 👍👍👍
This host is so naive come to knowledge of the world affairs😅😅😅
Was it also the convergence of interests when India aligned itself with the Five Eyes rather than the region?
What India needs to reflect above all is sincerity. If Indians in Singapore can reflect sincerity and rise above, then I do not see why Indian in India cannot. India just has to choose the right leaderships
👍👍👍
So you a nobody knows more about India & the leadership than Indians who voted leaders in power which is something in existent in China & corrupted in USA/Europe??!!
You don't become suddenly friends, friendship grows slowly and there are many factors involved in estsblishing a friendship. One of the very important factor is "trust".Mutual trust.Unconditional trust.
You lucky to hear from Pro. Kishore as I mention in anotherRUclips that he will be the happier person to see the two country managed the border issue.
The host looks like shellshocked not expecting what the answers he got from Kishore. He is not really nationalist he just a brainwashed by western interests.
Bien vu!! He is indeed a brown British/western slave as is 80% of Indian media!!
@@KuruKanagalingam nonsense
👍👍👍
Mahbubani is in a class of his own. The interviewer is injecting his rookie ideas unto this intelligence and giant of a Diplomat.
Settle down and control your emotions.
Galvan was an isolated incident. Local soldiers, commander may be to blame. One is unfair to hold Xi directly responsible .
According to the video the Indian soldiers came to the Chinese soldiers
In a past interview Kishor got pissed of with that journalist. Surprised he accepted to join this program again. Greetings from Taiwan
This is the first time I’m watching this host and he is such an emotional wreck! He lets his ego about being ‘Indian’ get to him, that he doesn’t listen to what Prof. Mahbubani is fully saying. He seems to be such an anti-China hater. Prof. Kishore Mahbubani is a fellow Singaporean and I’ve respected him and his writings for many years. He speaks with great care and diplomacy. If the average Indian and Indian media journalists like, Mr Rahul keep up their inflated and indignant ego about being Indian and being perpetually offended by China; then they will remain stuck in that vicious cycle of never MOVING FORWARD! It will be of their own doing. As Prof Mahbubani said, diplomatic relations rise and wane, but the most important thing to do, is to start with the latest/ newest starting point and move forward to make amends and improvements in the bilateral relationship. Prime Minister Modi is a great and strong leader. He wants to take the great nation of India to the next level. I believe China is happy for India to keep rising. As a Singaporean, I would like to see both India and China become powerful, secure and friendly towards each other.
Kishore has wisdom and depth of vision. The news host, on the other hand has tunnel vision and ask biased questions.
Kishore Mahbubani is a peacemaker who talks facts and is a realist!
I think any interviewer should gives the interviewee chance to discuss his or her feelings about the interview. The interviewer should not interrupt or project his or her feelings to the interviewee. People whose are watching the interview, want to understand every answer given by the interviewee.
You cannot trust anyone. It's only by common intrest.
Know your enemy, keep an eye on them. Economy is the only thing that will move forward.
"When you are weak shake hands; when you grow strong, attack"
Sun Zu
Art of War
I hope people understand the fundamentals beneath the surface of the India China Border issues:
1) India China Border issues are GOOD for India. It creates a "security narrative" to keep India united. Nothing unites a people better than an overwhelming external threat, no matter how real that threat is.
2) China won't invade India. Conflict yes, war no. It is quite simple. India and China are separated by a HUGE WALL. China knows India cannot come over the WALL to invade China. And India knows China cannot sustain the logistics of supporting an invading army coming down from the WALL. They need to face billions of Indians on the plain. Not possible.
3) The armed conflict in 1962 is just that: an armed conflict. India wants to "Look North" (aka, squeeze and squat into South Tibet) and China confronted India with an iron fist. But there is no war. China quickly retreated because, again, there was a serious logistics issue to sustain its force on the other side of the WALL.
4) But India would use this minor 1962 armed conflict to create a security narrative that there is a "Scary Northern Dragon" ready to invade India. So, we Indians need to be united and fight that dragon! With this narrative, the Indian government can distract its people from domestic issues, when the needs rise. Indian military will use this security narrative to squeeze for more government funding. Indian media will use constant reporting on this scary neighbor to get more views. "China Threat" becomes an industry for many people. Of course we cannot give up this industry for "peace." Peace won't make money. Scare does.
5) More than four years ago, Modi gambled that Trump would be in office for yet another 4 years, and even more years if his VP win after he leaves the office. So, Modi instigated a border conflict with China, expecting that China was in the middle of a trade war and tech war with US, and it would make concession to India. But the plan backfired. China swiftly gave India a bloody nose. Worst yet, Trump left office right after, and Biden had not provided more FDI and friendshoring to India, just empty talks in QUAD. As result of the border conflict, India's thriving economic cooperation with China suffered greatly. The Chinese imports, including finished products, components, chemicals and heavy equipment continues to enter India, as India's GDP growth depends on them. But there is no infrastructure and manufacturing ecosystem corporation between India and China. This lack of cooperation contributes to the stagnated Make In India progress. India's manufacturing percentage in GDP actually dropped, not grown, since Modi took office.
6) At the end, Indian people lost. Instead of riding on the rise of China, Indians are constantly pulling back and forth about this China Threat, which results in chilled economic relationship with the biggest manufacturing nation on this planet. It is time for a change. Thus, you see the thawing of India China relationship, with the BRICS meeting as the catalyst. From China's perspective, as long as India sits on the fence, not completely siding with US/EU camp, it is GOOD ENOUGH. So, China smiles to India. India smiles to China. A new beginning. But for how long?
Well Said 😅
Not just "middle of a trade war and tech war", but also midst a serious pandemic of what was then a deadly novel virus. To india, this was a moment when the stars & planet all aligned, so to speak. But like you said, it turns out to be a mistake.
You talk BS with a Chinese narrative!!
That host is preempt with war mongering and anti China attitude. He wont take no as an answer. On the other hand, Prof Kishore is highly intellectual and patient.
Your guest is right,India is thinking of five years while China is long term.China’s century of humiliation didn’t confine in mainland but overseas Chinese suffered greatly as well.we were treated like dirt.
👍👍👍
Why the host is so angry in this interview ?
If India insists on having the last say, it will retard the Asian century progress. India immediate needs are to develop the economy fast and steady which require a sustained period of political stability.
Singapore professor is right that foreign relation is built on convergence of national interest not blind trust. Current good relations with US is no exception.
Because of one party rule, China has very long term
Plan. Hopefully India does not miss the current rate opportunity for greatness by short term gains.
Professor is wasting his time on this sad character 😭😔😭!
Terrible hosts instead of letting the guest talk, non-stop depicting the negativity of China to position the guest to criticise China. If both countries(India & China) compromised, they must have concluded the benefits of working together. Don’t think the agreement is just initiated from China alone due to their economic downturn, India has even bigger issues - large poverty, good logistics infrastructure, stable electricity & supply-chain, etc. 🤔 Perhaps, India needs China
Great interview, asked very relevant questions.
USD falling and falling faster!
Well said, Prof
the interviewer has tonnes of ego ,,
he should climb down and allow his guest to explain his views ,, otherwise he come out as somebody who is fixed on making his point of view rather than allowing his guest to give his views freely ,,
Rahul is Voice of America 😅😅😅
❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤❤😂😂😂😂😂😂😂good for both side!!! Peace generate prosperity!!!!
Deputy Secretary of State Curt Campbell summed it up this way, "India cannot be counted on as US ally." it doesn't take a genius to decipher that. does it?
the gig is up for Modi.
Wrong, divergence will cause a war. According to China, there can't be two tigers on the top of the mountain.
Unprofessional host
Wise man
hope to hear the view of the professor on this newsman.
Really experienced guests in this topic .l see kisor sires other podcast he well known how countries in the world work. Thanks to india today for bringing him.
Dreaming to have much more benefits from both the west and the east, India only got pain.
This Rahul guy appears to a fool and no journalist. The poor fellow has to re learn basics of journalism!
He tried to act more loyal than the king attributing a lot India has never said officially.
He must learn to restrain himself and try to get useful analysis from great scholars like Kishore Mahbubani.
Not try overwhelming them like this guy tries to!
Rahul: The biggest question in China is if India (A-San) can be trusted 😂😂😅😅😅. So what do we do? Fight it out?
👌😂👍
😂😂😂interviewer keep insinuating China cannot be trusted😮😮 ask anyone, trust China or trust India??? Take a poll and see!!😂😂😂
👌😂👍
I find the host irritating. He is too opinionated and doesn't let the guest speak much. He might as well not invite any guests.
If China and India could get along with each other then what Kishore told was right when during a speech he told that if China and India could manage a working relationship that will benefit both
And this is why Prof Mahbubani is a professor while the interviewer is just a journalist. What a joke of an interviewer.
What do you expect? A love fest between them? Of course, it is a "convergence of interests." Politics 101: Any first-year college student can tell you that; one does not need 50 years of political experience to discern that.
These two great country should bolt together and see when these two become good friend they are greater than the US. but dont forget Russia.
Rahul is very emotional and biased , and is unfit to be a journalist
Just want to know - how much is INDIA's sovereign RESERVES - ?
And where is it KEPT ?..
In USA or EUROPEAN banks ?
Bottom Line; REMEMBER THE CHINESE “OPIUM” WARS 🤯SUPPORTED BY THE “BANIA” TEAM OF GUJARAT ‼️
Don't Indians listen to their Leaders speeches on what Agreements they make and their reasons? Don't they understand? Why should Indians and others try to understand it from reporters or medias views according to their interpretations? And it is not the job of reporters or medias to determine the geopolitics of a country unless directed by the Govt. of the day. Who rules the country and have the power to decide geopolitical strategies?
There are border disputes between China and India,both countries should address these issues,America should not be allowed to use India as its soldiers in America war on China,Taiwan is integral part of china just like Andaman is part of India,this fact is recognised by America and India,even then America is supplying weapons and soldiers to Taiwan,this is equivalent to sending weapons to terrorists in Kashmir,north east of India,do India encourage?
The anchor needs to explain why India decided to change its maps including places that are in China - but India likes to forget its own actions and pretend everything is 'unexplained.' Excellent to see the great Kishore Mahbubani -- shame about the interviewer.
This Journalist host has certainly come from a very biased mindset instead of being factual.
Cheers for another step towards world peace.
It seems that Indian never know they are facing much worse economy issue than China.
Just shut your mouth already, let your guests talk and answer your question. Jeez, zip it.
Can you be respectful? Why your language is always offensive as you Lebel China as Dragon!
India claim and China claim lac so who really are speaking truth..
Really two powerful countries shouldn't risk an undefined border this many decades😮
PM restored peace at LAC. National interest and economic progress are key strategy of the PM
Both China and India are competing powers so a certain amount of distrust will always remain
Everything is possible with the dharma ... Raise the consciousness above colonialism!
India needs to see China as a partner rather than an enemy.
Good afternoon Dr Kishore ❤️🇮🇳🇨🇳🦾😇
5 minutes into the interview is all that I could stomach seeing how mediocre and unprofessional Rahul is as an interviewer, and otherwise a huge waste of time saved by Kishore’s wisdom.
Rahul reflects the general ignorance and blind nationalism of the Indian population thinking that it is China that crawls to India for help. The fact is india is unable to protect its investors in manufacturing industries and many had left! Its many anti China moves had horribly backfired on itself, amongst many other failures, and the rest it’s not hard to see now who needs who more.
Well Said
The two countries have a long way to go
INDIA AND CHINA ARE NEIGHBOURS. INDIA UNDERSTANDS THE HUMILATIONS CAUSED BY THE WEST TO CHINA AS THEY ALSO SUFFERED THESE SAME HUMILIATIONS CAUSED BY THE WEST.cooperation is better then unneccesary conflict
LOL 😂 “CONVERGENCE” ON QUAD 🤣
Siamese twins bound by water resources!
If that was the case this host described, the West wouldn't be giving the BRICS group a dam about it.
BRICS Pay is the Future // UPI Payment is the Future // Like it or Not - !!
Mahbubani is right is emphasizing relation rather than trust as the guiding principles of geopolitics. India need to come out of the trauma of the thousand year rule of India by Muslims as the impediment in its relation with China.
Can India trusts US??? The professor is right that it is the convergence of interest that pull countries together. India n China has more interest with convergence possibility than between India and US.
The world has become a board game in which:
USA is playing Checkers, thinking 1 move ahead.
Russia is playing Chess, thinking 5 moves ahead.
China is playing Go (Weiqi 围棋), thinking 10 moves ahead.
Kishore mehbubani has formed Brics
Now Russian Grain can be transport to Africa cheaper via India thru China. A win-win for the Global South.
COUNTER QUESTION 🙋 CAN A RSS FASCIST “BANIA” BE TRUSTED ⁉️
Does this journalist work for CNN or Fox News by any chance?? That what his interviewing style reminds me of. Also, how dare he interrupt his excellency Mahbubani??