The latest version of the U.S. Army's Bradley Fighting Vehicle, which has proven itself in Ukraine

latest news
Welcome back to the Defense news channel for a discussion about The US Army has released photos of its new M2A4E1 Bradley Fighting Vehicle. In a statement, the Army called it "the most modern and survivable version" of the vehicle to date. Bradleys have been an important tool for Ukrainian forces, who have repeatedly praised the vehicle. Defense News is a RUclips channel dedicated to military world lover.
#M2A4E1 #Bradley
If useful, make sure to share this video with your friends!
__
Subscribe for updates:
/ @defensenewsdn

[@bryanmontgomery996]

TOW is pronounced "toe" as far as the missiles go.

[@supernova6187]

❤️🇺🇲❤️🇺🇦❤️🌏❤🌎❤🌍❤️

[@chandrachurniyogi8394]

a turretless variant of the M3A4E1 Bradley IFV with heightened (raised) hull . . . and a coil spring based 6.0 in. suspension lift that'll complement the torsion bar setup of the M3A4E1 Bradley IFV . . . modern day IFVs could do with lightweight ERA solutions (without compromising on overall protection) because weight is a big factor with tracked vehicles . . . a fully equipped M3A4E1 Bradley with necessary armour & protection suites shouldn't weigh anymore than 43.5 tons . . . a good passive protection system heightens the capabilities of an active protection suites . . . the aging wire guided TOW ATGM needs to be replaced with a wireless self guided target identification system . . . for e.g. FGM-148E Javelin inertial guided ATGM is a good alternative . . .

[@sifakid]

0:40 That post is in Indonesian? Didn't expect that.

[@GSSurry]

I could do without the annoying background music

[@caracoidwren944]

Before they add a new generation of armored vehicles, I'm really hoping the Army is taking the new battle space in mind, which includes potentially thousands of cheap drones buzzing overhead and precision missiles, which before too long some countries will be able to use to hit even moving targets. I don't see that anyone has properly addressed this or come up with any viable solution for. Right now, the war in Ukraine has shown the battle tank to be nothing more than a target for drones, and armored fighting vehicles to be nothing more than a troop concentration point that can easily be destroyed taking the troops along with it. And it's only going to get worse when everybody starts churning out millions of these drones. Right now, 1/800th of the US defense budget can create one million drones. How is armor going to stop these kind of numbers?
Just about any major or intermediate military in the world is capable of this sort of production. Building new armored vehicles is just a way to create scrap metal and dead soldiers when we look at what's on the way. As cheap as these drones are, I could easily see the US having numbers counted in the tens or even hundreds of millions. How does armor beat that or any of our current anti-drone systems? Image a swarm of a million drones coming after your army's armor all at once. Even if lasers were employed, the cost of producing enough of these super high-tech weapons to defeat this kind of threat would break the budget quickly.

[@steveyountz9184]

TOW......not......TAU...........

[@mcburcke]

Pretty sure them showing off the new version of the Bradley means they're not expecting to get the new replacement vehicles any time soon, if at all. History teaches that Big Army can't get any of their new equipment programs over the finish line before giving up on them or having them cancelled by Congress.