The Invisible Man - Angry Movie Review
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 сен 2024
- 💥Patreon ► / angryjoeshow
🔥YT Join ► ruclips.net/user/an...
AngryJoe, OtherJoe & Alex Review The Invisible Man, a horror thriller from blumhouse whose trailer pretty much ruined an otherwise great film!
👕 AJSA Shirts! ► bit.ly/2m2YJNq
🎬AJSA Posters! ► bit.ly/2HHR9z1
📺Twitch ► / angryjoeshow
🐦Twitter ► / ajsadelrith
🐦Twitter ► / otherjoe_ajs
🌎AJSA Community ► ajsagaming.com
![Cosmic Sin [WORST FILM of 2021?!] - Angry Movie Review](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ARmLm8yCYss/mqdefault.jpg)
![Cosmic Sin [WORST FILM of 2021?!] - Angry Movie Review](/img/tr.png)
![Thunder Force - Angry Movie Review [The WORST Superhero Film?]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/ENReZDWHo8Q/mqdefault.jpg)
"If you haven't seen the trailer, dont watch the trailer."
Shows trailer during initial spoiler free review. :/
Exactly what i was going to say...
Exactly da fuck are they doing
i meana ive seen it so many times cus i dont use ad blocker...its funny af tho they did that xD
2.26 in and they have already spoilt it
@@terro740 IKR. I feel like i've already seen the movie. They always put thr best parts in the adverts anyway. Kinda sad. They could have been a bit ambiguous with the twist and really surprised audiences
"don't see the trailer before the movie!"
*shows trailer in the review*
BRO
Big FACTS
I got an ad for the movie before the video lol
Came here to say this. Like how many times can you repeat the trailer while saying that you shouldn't watch the trailer?
But the main reveal is probably that the Invisible Man is an invisible man, so that's... Ya know.
Amateur reviewers..wait the title of the movie is the invisible man..and..he's invisible....🙄the trailer gave it all away..not the title?
@@dr.pharaoh6440 You know, when somebody tells you NOT to watch the trailer, and then shows you the trailer, that's hypocritical, no matter if the twist is in the name.
Joe: Watches a movie called "The Invisible Man
Also Joe: rEvEaL YoUrSeLf
"I could fight an invisible guy!"
- Jose "Cheeto Fingers" Vargas
CAME HERE FOR THIS COMMENT
@@MaleTears are you CRYING tears or RIPPING tears?
@@fabiomoreira1506 cumming them tears
@@MaleTears XD
Hahaha
The Invisible Man? Sounds like my father
Sounds like me
I felt that.
Get it? Their father left them. See the joke? That's what it means. Their father left them and never came back so they're invisible. Get the joke? That's it.
ME
I know how you feel. I only ever met mine when I was probably 1 or 2 years old, and that was it, for good reason too.
He doesn’t shoot the guy point blank because he’d spray blood on himself, so he walks away and does it from a distance.
agree！
Dude... who shoots a gun backwards?
@@BankerPaul Invisible narcissistic sociopaths?
@@BankerPaul Anybody who thinks holding a gun sideways is cool, that's who.
He didn't shoot anyone.
0:28
“That was one of the worst intros I’ve ever done on this show”
Press X to doubt
He's a looser
@@mariuskristensen1867, interesting. Why do you watch the videos then?
Haha you fanboys can blow me
So you guys are gay for angry joe interesting
Jacob McMahan *loser guys
I dont know what u guys were expecting from a title “the invisible man” lmao
A movie about werewolves???
Not much to look at!
Exactly !!!
They were expecting a movie about him, not about her.
But it wasnt about him, it was all about her reactions to him. He wasnt the pro/antagonist, she was.
So they wanted more suspense as we might guess whether he was real or not.
I can see where they are coming from. Not my kind of movie direction personally. I prefer they didnt use the name since it was a bit misleading.
As a take on the idea, it should have had a new title.
waltermh111 Cecilia wasn’t the antagonist. The movie had scenes where they were maybe copies in concept from upgrade which the director was also in part. Too much emphasis on her.
If I was the invisible Man I'd just be tea bagging everyone.
"The trailers spoil EVERYTHING."
"Here's what's in the Trailers!"
lol After seeing other comments, this point doesn't seem to be lost on the viewership...
I feel like this is the problem with horror films today-people are so used to the OH AH of a jump scare, that when a slow burn horror that DOES NOT RELY on jump scares to scare the shit out of the audience does come around, people go "eh" instead of realizing "oh maybe this is what makes good horror good." because the invisible man touches on primordial terror: shit we can't see, shit we don't know, shit we can't see coming. It's why we fear death, it's why we fear the dark, it's why we fear the unknown-it's something we can't see, or fight. And that's why Invisible Man works. At least for me it worked-I got major Paranormal Activity 2007 vibes from this film and I like that.
Yes, exactly. To the film played with the fact that audience knows he's invisible because it kinda sets us on equal mindset with the protagonist. We know he's there but we have no idea what he could do next and the protagonists knows that he's so genius that whatever she thought was impossible may still very well happen. Both parties feel kinda helpless. For me expectations of violence is much worse than actually seeing it so until that it was fucking tense for me. I also didn't know the age rating and tone because I didn't see any marketing for this and I thus I didn't know if I'm supposed to expect nobody or everybody dying and I felt that the movie trod the line between those two to subvert my expectations.
To me it would have been bigger cliche if we had to be guessing if he's actually invisible or imagination so I was pleasantly surprised when the movie instantly showed its hand and was like "what you gonna do about it, though? I'm still going to torture them and you can just watch and suffer."
THANK YOU FOR HAVING A BRAIN
Ribotto Studios fuck that. You want a slow burn horror film? Watch “The Lodge”, a movie these three completely shit on during their review of it.
This movie wasn’t a slow burn at all. It was two hours of Elizabeth Moss rolling around on the floor screaming.
It’s just a shallow film that has nothing to say about anything, and pretending like there’s something “deeper” to strap in for if you appreciate slow-paced film is simply disingenuous to yourself and to everyone else reading this nonsense.
The reason this movie failed for me had nothing to do with the long shots or the build-up of suspense, and everything to do with the boring and predictable writing from start-to-finish. There wasn’t a SINGLE thing unpredictable about the film, and there wasn’t a single thing to be scared of - since even if he was present in a scene, he was fucking invisible, so who cares?
The movie’s first act is strong, and had they stuck with the ambiguity that they had built during that time - “is she crazy? Or is she sane?” - then the movie would have been MUCH better. Instead they drop all mystery 30 minutes in, spoon feed you everything, and it turns into another “bad man is bad because he’s bad, and woman is good because she’s good” film with absolutely no character depth or point to anything.
It’s another Blumhouse film, and to me it’s as forgettable as the other 45 on Hulu.
Yeah your right but this is all ruined bc you know he’s invisible
Angry Joe has ADHD, I can't believe he completely missed the reasoning behind the interesting and "slow" camera work.
It should be called the phantom menace
Darius S LOL Yes it should.
Blumhouse needs a better marketing team. Every horror trailer they produce uses way too many tropes.
Unfortunately general audiences are dumb, and general audiences are only going to see movies that show tropes in their trailers. Blumhouse knows this better than anyone
But they make a lot of money with those trailers.
As I said before ... Everything is a so-called trope. Even subverting audience expectations has become one these days, just as the dark/surprise ending has. To paraphrase something I was told one day, "Everything is cliche until it happens to you."
That's how they keep making movies. "Better" means "more expensive" and they cut costs to the bare minimum. I've honestly stopped watching trailers for horror films. If there's a high rotten tomatoes score, I go see it. If not, I don't. It's not always a perfect system but more often then not I end up enjoying the film. I don't trust rotten tomatoes on every genre but horror is so hit and miss and always spoil the best scenes in the trailers.
They are just a financier that throws money at every script hoping for the next big viral hit they can spin into cheap high return sequels.
Spoilers start at 14:39
spoilers start at 0:00 actually
broface plays 😂😂😂😂
Thank you
Thanks!!!!!!!!!
So the guy made Stealth Camouflage from MGS crossed with the Invisibility Cloak from Harry Potter
And the guy's name is John Cena.
And he was trained by the best Yautja predator of the Dark Blade Clan.
"How do you beat an invisible man?"
Me: Invisible bullets
Find his invisible wife who's tired of waiting for him to come home.😅
powder for floor, wiretraps for walls, certain type of smoke, lasertrip (human eye cant see shit, sensitive sensors are best in this case), caltrops, explosives\mines in expendable places (shrapnel damage mostly available), animals because smell, water and electricity...
@@deanjenkins3077 oil on the ground and a ton of nails.
Flamethrowers!!!
Lmao genius dude... genius
The Invisible Man: Drax!!
Crow Hogan John Cena
If this isn’t the biggest plot twist to the movie, I do not know what is. 😂😂
Them skounst
I saw this movie without having ever seen a trailer for it. It was amazing
Nice! 👍🏼
"Don't watch the trailer"
*Plays trailer behind review*
Thanks.
OZGlitch you beat me to it
Also telling you what's in the trailer
Also spoiling a critical spoiler from the trailer smh
The trailer for this, honestly, just seemed like a bad Hollow Man sequel, rather than a reboot for a Universal's Classic Monsters character.
I haven't seen it yet but it IS a shame that so many films ruin things through the trailer these days.
They ruin things because there so many trailers out there, people aren't remembering what's happening in the trailers. They just remember they like or dislike a trailer. Whose have time to over analyze a trailer?
@@lexis4490 well, everybody. That's the point of trailers. The issue is, they either give away too much in the trailer, as stated in this video, or the trailer misrepresents the movie, which they also kind of said here. A lot lately, trailers seem to be including footage that isn't even IN the film, which is *kinda* false advertising. ALSO, these very guys have an entire series where they watch and analyze trailers, so I'm sure they have time for it, too.
Don’t call it The Invisible Man..
Joe: call it “The InViSiBlE”....
So stupid lol
The trailer honestly didn’t reveal that much in hindsight imo. Also Alex’s nitpicking was a bit much here. Movie is at least an 8 tbh.
Showed all the key points of the movie with those key points of the movie a person with a little bit of imagination can fill out the remaining stuff that happens in the movie.
lone wolf sure, some key points but not all. There’s definitely a few surprises towards the end.
@@lonewolf3314 But whose remembering all the beats of the trailer? The trailer is suppose to be a reminder that this movie is coming out. I don't have time over analyzing trailers.
@@lexis4490 people with photographic memories like myself.
Is just my opinion that people who make trailers should not make them. They suck at it. Probably its not even the fault of the people doing it but the ones demanding such trailers the studios and executives. Not only that they do not sell the movies but they ruin the movies for those who have seen the trailers. Thats why i tend not to watch trailers but when you are already in a cinema (movie theater) they usually put on these trailers before the movie you are about to watch starts. Nevermind me, that is just my opinion.
What you expect Alex is the typical party pooper who wants to be unique and different and always expect perfection. Not to mention he likes all the avarege marvel movies and never pointing out the flaws some of them have.
The idea of invisible man was scary before IR cameras existed.
This movie was dope. Haven't seen a thriller this good in a long time.
The first half was amazing the last hour to me was stupid bunch of horror movie cliches still a decent movie
@Marsili ILI recommend me some good thrillers
@Marsili ILI there was a movie I saw about some teenagers that snuck into a blind man's house. I think it was called "Lights Out" that was pretty good.
@@ekoms108 "Don't Breathe"
Ahh okay. I thought it was Lights Out because of the ending when he turns off the lights ... Ya know?
🎶 Invisible man, take me by the hand, lead me to the land that you understand 🎶
Invisible man, the voyage to the corner of the globe, is a real trip
austin turner invisible man, the crust of the tan man imbibed by the sand
Invisible man, can you see through the wonder of amazement at the oberman
I thought it was ocean man
Bobman9420 somebody give this guy a medal 🥇
“Domestic abuse is bad and women should be believed!”
...who said otherwise?
Of course a woman would never lie about such things.
People lie, aren't women people too?
@@foulgrowl5893 Bill Burr - "are you levitating above the rest of us?"
@@madspice1663 Amber Heard didn't get the meme, I guess.
@@madspice1663 and of course there's no such thing as an abusive spouse right? Both sides are retarded, you shouldn't just believe all woman and you shouldn't assume they are all liars either. You judge on a case by case basis
Damn this John Cena movie looks dope!
I'm down
How can u tell
Only thing I remembered from the trailers was when she threw the paint on him.
So was this movie supposed to be a spiritual successor of the (2000) Hollow Man with Kevin Bacon?
I don't think so?
Alex: "Gaslighting The Movie"
That's actually where the term gaslighting comes from. The 1944 movie Gaslight.
no it doesnt you fucking moron lmao
@@EazyDuz18 Yes it does.
Joe not talking over everyone and constantly telling Alex he is wrong makes for a much better show. Good job Joe.
John Cena: “that’s cute.”
The movie was good and of course the dude is gonna be able to go invisible just based on the title alone.
When she grabbed the suit it crossed my mind that they were both going to fight while invisible and that made me laugh
😂😂😂😂 that's hilarious
Hahaha yes
I'm pretty sure this was originally supposed to be part of the Dark Universe, which is why it stuck with the title.
it was but my god glad it isnt lol
Viper Originally it was with Johnny Depp but after Mummy fail, they gave all the monsters to Blumhouse to make as stand alone movies instead of Monster Avengers haha
@Lassi Kinnunen deadpool 2 wants a word with you.
@Lassi Kinnunen Because in the original, the invisible man wears bandages for a large part of the movie. So most of the acting would need to be through voice and movement, and Depp is good at that.
@@PaulCastles They most definitely did not give the monsters to blumhouse.
Haven’t seen it yet but I love the concept. A invisible stalker creeping on a female seems really scary
It's her over controlling ex husband
DP_2020 I didn’t like it at all. Way beyond the point of being believable. I tried
DP_2020 were you trying to spoil it for me I’m confused? I literally just watched a video about people talking about it if you were trying to spoil it for me you truly do suck, sucks for you I watched the spoiler section
@@MarioBario I'm gonna be sure I spoil the next Deadpool film for you.
@@Spartan-bl4pq why are you acting this way? It was in the trailer of this movie
Plot twist: The Invisible Man is John Cena!
Who?
But you can see him
Lol
Lol, Gee, thanks for spoiling the movie, dick.
Joe: They ruined this by showing too much in the trailer
Joe: This would be a 9 or even a 10 if you go into this not watching the trailer
Joe: It's such a pity they showed to much in the trailer
Also Joe: *shows trailer, talks about what's in the trailer, mentions major plot points from the film
Also Joe at end, so okay guys, go see this... you'll love it but go in without watching the trailer.
Still doesn't top the 1933 classic Masterpiece!!!
Of course not. That is a classic.
@Uncle Crispy Twisted lets hope this is not a new monster universe. Imagine the Frankenstein's monster he would be a cyborg in the future...wait that would be another Robocop movie. I am so disappointed.
@Johnny Ortega let me guess. To you, is this movie pandering because the lead is female?
That film was garbage xD
@Johnny Ortega Dude...you're such a sensitive snowflake.
“I’d be so proud of you guys if you don’t watch the trailer going in.” Already showed the trailer at this point in video. 🤦🏻♂️
Is he the one who edits the video? One of them?
The ending 100% makes this movie. It is one of the best payoffs for a character journey ever.
FACTS
I thought this movie was fantastic! 9/10
I disliked the ending. I hate happy, good endings. Adrian should of won.
@@SympatheticNightmare how was it happy?
@@blackoutbiz Her being able to kill Adrian and getting away with it.
This is why I never watch trailers (loved the movie btw)
How can you not see the trailer RUclips just puts it in every video on RUclips at least for me it's very dumb.
Get adblock
@@SympatheticNightmare do you have
to pay for it
@@trickmaster5632 Its an extension on chrome, so no. Literally google adblock plus then click on chrome store.
@@trickmaster5632 cmon Grandma, wise up
The dude lived in a walled off mansion but needed a shock collar on the dog.
All about that need to control.
ummm that's a big nitpick that doesn't even really hold up. He needed to control everything so it makes sense.
The trailer doesn't even reveal that much about the film, honestly.
Kyle Roberts yeah not really sure what these guys are talking about...tons of twists and scenes not in trailer
Him attacking people, the paint spill ruined the attic scene for me, other moments of tension that were undercut
@@hunterquam4542 but the entire last half wasn't even shown in the trailer.
Everyday people’s minds don’t go to “Invisible Man” when they see shit floating. They are usually too stunned to do anything or think of ghosts. And the whole point of the suit is to make her sound crazy to other people, not the audience watching. Lastly, how does she know how to operate the suit if she puts it on?
She literally figured out to turn the suit invisible when she snuck back into his house. Not everything has to be shown
This movie was great. And for the record from a person who saw the movie. The trailer didn’t spoil it. You in fact did. Yes we knew he was invisible but you literally said how he became invisible in the first 5 minutes. The trailer didn’t tell us that. smh
Think he means more about if he was alive or not
Ghost walker Games I understand that. But even if they did say he was alive we had no clue how, or how he became invisible. Joe literally told us how he became invisible.
@@JamaalSTL true true
This movie does not try to make the audience belive she is just insane. It is clear that the Invisible man is not a manifistation of her imagination from the first time he interacts with her.
I had three grips with the movie. (spoiler)
1. When she jams the pen in her arm she stops bleeding seconds after.
2. Does Adrian have three suits? Other why weren't his brother flickering in when attacking Sydney? Did Adrian fix it so fast?
3. Who was it that killed Adrian in the end? It could not have been the main character as she could not take of the suit in time before Adrian died. Also if it where her then how did the suit fit? I don't think optical lenses stretch that good.
Can confirm. Had a great time with the film and managed to avoid the trailer going in.
I didn’t watch the trailer and I had no idea what the move would be about it was fantastic. Emily Moss should win an award.
I haven't see the trailers before watching it, and I loved it. And knowing he was invisible didn't ruin it for me, it's more a "where is he" experience for me. For the hopital scene, don't forget she's under strong medication, her mind can be blurry
LITTLE SPOILER
We see his breathe in the cold so it'l logical that pepperspray works on him
@Uncle Crispy Of course he's invinsible, have you seen the movie ?
palaniuki he didn’t he’s a moron
@@Qthetar Pretty sure he meant that Adrian isn't an invisible man, he is a man in an invisible suit. The original reference being to a man who is actually invisible.
Shawn The suit still makes him an invisible man. They made it more realistic and modern. Having a man just become invisible makes no sense whatsoever.
@@Qthetar Which is not the case for the original where in the man is literally invisible. Uncle Crispy said that this movie has nothing in common with the original, and he is correct. That is the point I was making.
when she was explaining to her sister that she had the suit as evidence I was yelling at the screen "THEN WHY DID YOU LEAVE IT AT THE HOUSE?! " seriously, she had someone drive an hour to get there just to take it out and then hide it in the closet. And I agree with you guys, she should have put the damn suit on.
Holy Moly I just realized Joe is cloning himself in different sizes
Greg C 😆
I think you had missed the point of the beginning. Cameras were panned to have you feel that he was there amidst the uplifting portions of the movie, instilling a constant dread throughout. It was also a great build-up within the amount of time they had for this movie, and for me, it allowed for me to feel the same sense of uncertainty as the protagonist was feeling. Awesome.
Granted, the trailer did show too much. Yet, with so little marketing, how else were you to convey that this is a movie worth watching without such a trailer. There was obviously no lead-up to this film and hardly any other advertising as such.
They could have made the trailer seem more psychological. Like maybe it's there or maybe her abuser psychologically broke her causing her to see things. They basically just flat out said in the trailer yeah he for sure there just invisible.
you're right. i've seen several trailers for this movie and i feel like i've seen the movie. plus, in this day and age where there are cameras everywhere, it would not be that hard to prove this person exists.
But the movie does prove he exist. The police think they catch him.
One of the perks about not watching much TV is that I more often then not ever see the trailers unless you look for them yourself on the internet. I didn't even know about this moving being a thing till a handful of days ago.
Personally, I can't stand Elisabeth Moss, especially when she talks about her fancy space religion.
I didn't even know she was a Scientologist, until this comment. Whatever - doesn't affect her movies/TV shows at all.
I feel like a lot of people just want their horror movies to be straight-up action movies. I never saw the Friday the 13th movies are Halloween movies as actual horror movies because it feels like there's way too much action and fighting for it to be scary. I feel like this movie had a good mix of both action and horror where there are scenes where you don't know where he is which is actually scaring. Yes you know he's invisible but the question is where is he. The darkness is scary because we can't see very well and it can be very unsettling and it's an invisible man you can have that same sensation in a brightly-lit room. People forget what the Paranormal Activity movies were actually really scary for the first two at least before they became beaten to death they were actually scary
Also, saw the trailer many times and it’s still a 9/10. Come on guys. It’s a great movie.
No it wasn't
The vast majority of audiences and critics would disagree with you
@@mattwagnermovies6308 Then the vast majority of audiences and critics have bad taste. The movie was brimming with plotholes and the awful writing didn't make up for it. The acting was good though, I'll give it that.
What plot holes?
@@mattwagnermovies6308 You're joking. There are so many that I can't possibly go over all of them here. But I'll name a few.
If Adrian didn't kill himself, who died? Was nobody involved? Did the brother just cremate him without any police investigation? Why does Zeus not need to eat or drink? Or did the dog just provide for itself for a couple months? How could the girl think Cecilia hit her when her arms were down and she was four feet away. She was looking right at her. Cecilia should have been validated then and there. Are there no security cameras in this universe? How did nobody see a floating knife? How did the pepper spray make him tumble over like he just took a shot to his groin when he had his face fully covered? Pepper spray doesn't make you fall over. Why does the suit suddenly give people super strength?
There are many more but should be obvious if you have watched the movie.
Pffft, People didn't see 'Dark Phoenix' because it didn't have Xmen in the name (and it sucked). Calling it anything other than "The Invisible Man" would negate the ability to coast off of the already established name.
Same for the Hunger Games movies which didn't have any Hunger Games, or
The only invisible man i liked was the one in League of Extraordinary Gentlemen
That movie is so underrated. Loved it. It would be awesome if we could get a sequel to that, specially in this era of Superhero movies, it could sell if it was well made.
A very underrated film. Don’t understand the hate
Kevin bacon
@@igorsenayoutube I like the movie but as a guilty pleasure, because even as I enjoy watching there are verry strong flaws. I prefer a reboot and be made by the direction of Guillermo Del Toro. The comic book story have some similarities with hellboy so there will be no problem if he made it.
@@craigthebrute8932 It definitely has some flaws. Guillermo would probably do a great job. The material suits him i think. Let´s hope for a reboot or a sequel. I never read the comics but they seemed fun.
I had the experience of seeing Paranormal Activity in theaters without seeing a trailer or hearing anything about it, it made the movie 100x better
"The Trailer ruined the movie" And this review too. But I must say the movie is called "The Invisible Man" and not "Invisible" because it's about a guy who can turn invisible. If this was a psychological drama with a woman seeing things most people will be ranting the movie for the name alone.
I'm kinda proving your point because until today I didn't know about this movie, only that it's probably based on same book as the 1933 adaptation. And to me it felt like the first hour was playing with the fact that I know for 100% sure that he's there and he's gonna fuck their shit up. First thing we see about him is that he has no restraints when it comes to violence, then we hear what kind of genius he is, then we see few happy moments and instead of trying to guess the direction of the movie, I spend the first hour in desperation knowing that the there's actual physical threat to them literally in every scene and it's not the matter of if, it's how and when. Unreliable narrator can be interesting but I personally found this approach more refreshing. Show the threat and proceed to sadistically torture characters that were actually really likable. I didn't know the tone or age rating though so I was also had to be guessing how severe that torture is going to be. So to me in my circumtances it was almost perfect; dude who has watched some horror, not enough predict everything but enough to have expectations to be subverted and someone who also didn't see the trailer (I don't think it received any marketing where I live).
To me there were only three things that really broke my suspence of disbelieve: how her sister reacted to e-mail, how the suit stopped malfunctioning when that would have actually been inconvenient and how the guards showed in like 5 pairs of two, always with so much time between them that they conveniently didn't see what happened. But honesly they were only kinda small irritations and by no means ruined anything.
But one thing that I found interesting was that the dog didn't die. We all know dead dog syndrome and I think the film knew that. From the moment I saw it I knew it's going reveal the bad guy at one point and then just when protagonist thinks she's escaped, she sees the dog dead and the invisible man pummels her. But when that confrontations happened, the dog didn't die and thus probably also didn't attack him. I found that piece of characterization interesting. He controlled the dog with shock collar like he tried to control everyone else around him, too but he didn't want to kill him and the dog wasn't scared of him or really hostile towards him, just more lile confused because it smelled him but saw nothing so something was wrong. To me that tells that he wasn't abusive towards the dog, just overbearing. That also supports the fact that before hid bloodlust got better of him, OR more likely when events spired out his CONTROL, he restrained himself from killing anyone. Narcissists think what they do is always justified so most likely thought he only did what was absolutely necessary and so while was a monster, I don't think his intentions were pure evil. Mind you, I'm not defending him, just saying that he was neutral evil thinking ve was lawful evil.
And the ending was definitely one of the better oned in horror genre. To kill a monster you must become a monster. 9/10, I can't blame director and writers for goofs in marketing department. Correct me if I'm wrong but aren't tralers and other advertisement usually done by completely different team?
Angry Joe: Lay Wanelle
Angry Joe; we watch hundreds of movies every year
I have no idea what Joe doesn't like about the title being "The Invisible Man" or why he thinks "Invisible" is better
The title spoils the fact that the villain is a invisible man
@@_ripVanWinkle_that was never meant to be a spoiler for the movie. it’s an adaption of a book with the same title. The movie announced who was going to play the invisible man role.
*Someone Needs to Adapt* The League of Extraordinary Gentlemen properly - The Invisible Man was so Interesting in that Comic.. He was pretty much like he was in this movie only more demented.
This is based on the old Invisible Man movie, where a scientist conducts secret experiments and manages to create an invisibility serum and when he goes missing, a man in bandages shows up in a hotel. A side effect of the serum is it drives him insane.
@@stevenfrost3469 Pretty much Hollow Man, lol.
@@Dexter-gd7qj exactly, it was far more accurate than this new one.
The reason they changed the Invisible Man is that the rights the character is owned by Universal Studios. So the reason the character was so different was because Lawyers.
@@stevenfrost3469 Does it drive him insane, or was he crazy to begin with? Or...is it a little of both?
During the review: "don't watch the trailer everyone, it ruins the movie!"
Also during the review: "shows the trailer in the background several times"
I love how heated Alex got about the chiefs knife 🤣🤣 gold
Seriously... he’s so petty.
Well he does love cooking 😂
@@jjoe7078 Joe literally Alex is a chef, he did say it makes no sense to have a steak knife with no steak 😂
The fights with the invisible man were created with a guy wearing a green suit and cables on Elizabeth's shoulders,it's no CGI . Very well done movie
I'd keep turning Del's PC off till he went outside.
This movie made me legitimately uncomfortable. One of the best decisions I made long ago was to stop watching trailers. One of the smartest things I've ever done and I am not a particularly smart individual.
2:27 Joe literally spoils the twist.
If you were really looking forward to watching a film an didnt want it to be spoiled , would you have the balls to watch these guys review it beforehand? I certainly wouldnt
Created invisible suit the first thing u do is stalking ur ex girlfriend
And if you are gonna be a super rich guy with a Predator stealth suit. Do pick a woman worth stalking ffs. That chick wasn't worth a drunk fuck.
best movie of 2020 so far in my opinion I enjoyed every minute of it along with the twist and turns.
Shut your SJW mouth. It woke crap.
Me: 1 ticket for "transparent spoiler"
Ticket guy: ummm,.. you mean I visible man?
Me: huh uh yeah I barely listened to the title
5:20 Oh My God I was so happy that I never saw that part in any of the trailers, I never get scared when it comes to jump scares or at least I rarely do but I’ll admit that part got me! Why would they ruin that intense scene in a trailer?? Smh
The first name of the main character, Cecilia, is derived from the Latin Caecus which means blind or eyeless, Appropriately, she cannot see the Invisible Man. She is frequently called 'C' in the film, which, obviously, is pronounced like 'see.'
The opening sequence originally had original music written for it, but Leigh Whannell and the sound design team felt it worked better with silence and the sound of the crashing waves.
No actors' names appear at the beginning of the film.
The outside wall of the mental institution has a graffiti piece depicting Billy the Puppet, the doll the Jigsaw Killer uses in Saw (2004). Director Leigh Whannell wrote and starred in Saw (2004)
The scene that had me freak the hell out was that freaking transition to the eggs cooking. Damn eggs were scarier than the rest of the movie.
I know you guys are young, but I was born in 1964 and already knew that the "Invisible Man" was a FAMOUS Universal Studios Villain! The trailer never spoiled the fact he was real, because MANY versions of this story have been made before, (including a TV SERIES)! Your generation is new to this horror story, so listening to your review of this film is kind of amusing! I'm glad you enjoyed it though!
I watched it the other night and didn't see the trailer beforehand so I had no expectiations but it turn out surprisingly good.
Somebody was taking care of the dog... dude was "cremated", inheritance papers were drawn up, she's committed, all kinds of days have gone by... who's feeding the dog?... I knew dude wasn't dead when I saw him after all that. And how the F did he get all that paint out of all those moving camera gadgets and crevices in the sink and then put it back on? It's a onesy right?
Loved the movie, great shocks and scenes with the invisibility
This is why, as a horror fan, you DONT watch trailers anymore. As soon as a trailer starts to grab me i turn it off. Has made things so much better the last 10years
"Don't watch the trailer" after showing several pivotal shots from the trailer. Okay Joe 😂
A girl that showers in my house with the shower door open, the bathroom door open, AND the bedroom door open is the best guest ever, not the worst guest ever.
"I accidentally walked in on you showering... and stood here for a few minutes... by accident... again... oops..."
"Also, you seem to have misplaced your towel... and clothes. How unfortunate..."
Just stands there in the doorway, watching.
Hey AJ, just wanted to say I like your channel. The chemistry all three of you have is fantastic and your opinions are always interesting and funny to watch
Too bad they became SJWs.
@Ravishey I was thinking the same thing. Fun chemistry while they talk about movies, games, whatever. 😄👍🏼
An hour of "Omg I'm a victim, help me", we get it, Cecilia, you're traumatized. Please, move on.
The last hour gets fun and interesting, Cecilia starts fighting back and everything gets real.
My final thought : What if Cecilia was the manipulator all along ? She seemed very suspect at the end. The poor victim who couldn't even step outside without having a panic attack now schemes an intricate plan to execute Adrian on camera with an invisible suit and as she exits the mansion all smug and confident she easily convince the cop to let her leave.
"The Invisible Man"
*Drax has entered the chat*
The people making movie trailers need to get their shit together.They are destroying good movies...
My Hero Academia: Heroes Rising?
Dr. DeadPool highly doubt any of them watch my hero sadly lol
As awesome as that would be, I don’t think they’re anime people
Joe like dbz that’s about it lol
I saw about half of it because I could not stay awake. I would give it a 5.
literal trash series. about as bad as Black Clover. Only 15 year olds like that garbage
Was she abused, the movie started with her drugging him, and her sister clueless to the abuse...?
Yes the woman was a victim of domestic violence.
Angry Joe: trailer gave away everything
NPC's: you showed trailer.
Captain Obvious called, he wants his comment back.
Elizabeth Moss' facial expression are some of the best in the business
When you consider how bad this could have possibly been and wasn't, you appreciate it being quite good even more.
The new candyman trailers out
Looks like crap compared to the original Tony Todd movie.
@@dedcaesar2325 how so?
The Centre Tony Todd is playing Candyman...
*****SPOILER********
What about the guy that picks her up off the street, a random stranger, drives her miles to Adrian's house, tells him 'I'll be 2 minutes, maybe 20 then you can drive me back to the city'.....and he does, just wtf!
Normal random helpful stranger would be like 'I'll drop you at the cop station, I only came out for bog roll!'
If the film showed she said something like 'I'll give you $5k if you drive me around' (she comes into money at one point) then I get it, but noooo.
Nobody:
The invisible man:
If you take out the invisibility suit, this a Lifetime stalker of the week movie. And, yet another SJW movie about the evil rich white man persecuting a woman or a minority. Other recent examples Hustlers, Revenge, Unsane, The Intruder, Ready or Not and Knives Out. She even describes gas lighting as part of his plan. Thinly veiled metaphors. The movie never gives us any explanation why this guy is so mean to her or why he's so evil and angry in the first place. Nor does it provide any explanation why a really good looking young rich white guy would be with Elizabeth Moss. Oh, it's because she plays crazy really well and it works well for the story. SPOILERS **** It was a nice setup and competently shot, but the movie lost me when no one in that crowded restaurant saw the floating knife fly across the table and slit her sisters throat by itself. Suspense movies need a certain amount of realism to be believable enough to get invested, but this one was just too dumb with its reality.
Alex rocking the 2016 Pixel XL, same here, love you man!
What happens if the dude has to fart or sneeze while sneaking around in the suit? He can just stop all of his own involuntary bodily functions because plot?