Pilot Forgets Thrust During Go Around
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 23 дек 2022
- Enjoy this episode of 3 Minutes of Aviation!
✈ SOURCES / FURTHER INFORMATION
Kuwait Boeing 777 failed go around attempt
• EXTREME LANDING! Kuwai...
Airbus A350 maximum bank angle test
• A350 Maximum Bank Angl...
Airbus A321 go around from cockpit perspective
• GO AROUND! Airbus A321...
Delta Airbus A350 super smooth landing in Amsterdam
• SMOOTH LANDING Delta A...
Boeing 747-400 in cruise filmed by a pilot
Video by Florian T.
✈ BECOME PART OF THE CHANNEL
Merch Store - teespring.com/stores/3-minute...
✈ CONTACT ME
Submit videos, give feedback, ask questions - 3minutesofaviation@gmail.com
If you liked the video, please subscribe and turn on notifications - I appreciate it! 
Наука
Isn't a go-around without thrust just called a landing?! 😆😉
This is fake news. You're correct with your observation.
yep
An unexpected landing.
😂 😂 😂 😂 😂
The exact remark I was about to make…
That Delta A350 landing was so smooth the pax probably didn’t realise they’d touched down till the reverse thrust was engaged!
As well as the spoilers going up they are always pretty loud
Delta doesn't have the best reputation, but their pilots seem to be pretty good. That Kuwati pilot needs more training. Forgetting the thrust?
The struts going down vibrate the fuselage I believe
How does a pilot forget the thrust?? That’s like me trying to pass a semi on the interstate and forgetting to touch the throttle
I flew Delta into Amsterdam around 4 years ago. It was the smoothest landing I ever felt. Can confirm I was waiting for it to hit for a second, not realizing it was already on the ground!
So when I saw the title for the smooth landing, I thought, "Come on, how smooth could it be that it's worthy of being included here?". And then I saw it. Wow, it's like the plane just floated to the ground like a feather.
Same. Thought the exact same thing till I saw it. Rewatched it 5 times after that.
What does your title show? For me it doesnt show anything about a smooth landing
@@felixx321 I meant the title slide right before that particular clip.
That delta landing was so smooth loved it. I once had such a smooth landing on a jet airways flight where I was unaware that we had landed until i felt the plane slowing down
Delta doesn't seem too bad when it comes to landing smooth. I flew on an A350 with Vietnam Airlines and they landed hard both times I flew on them where Delta was pretty smooth. Have videos of the landings on my channel if you want to see.
That was like massive no wipe dump 😲 glorious 😇
So smooth most passengers still had their window shades closed and didn't realise it was landing.
I don’t fly often enough so I don’t have that many smooth landing experience. But one was with Air Transat’s A310 from Quebec City to Montreal. Exactly like described, did not realize we are already on the ground until deceleration. 🧈 and it was pouring rain that night in Montreal.
DUDEE GoAir had like the smoothest take-off where you couldn't feel the G forces and you wouldn’t know that you had taken off unless you saw out the window ( this might be over exaggerated for dramatic effect )
That Delta landing was beautiful. Reminds me of a BA landing into GLA in a very heavy fog. We had been descending for what felt like forever, and I was aware of the standard turns onto final north through north west through west to south west over the Campsie Hills. But seen absolutely nothing of the ground. Even in poor weather you usually see the hills where the last turn is made as it’s only a couple of thousand feet below.
Anyway, that pilot came in so smooth in that fog, I wasn’t aware we had landed until he used the reverse thruster. 12/10 smoothest landing ever.
Smooth because it was a full zero vis autoland with the computer doing all the work!
Well sorry to ruin your vision about the pilot of this particular flight, but you mentioned yourself the visibility was very low due to the fog so it was ILS approach with autoland, so all kudos to engineers rather than a pilot in that case.
12/10 ? why not 14/10 or 56/10 or 200658/10 ?
well, i guess 10/10 is gone out of style
Probably an ex-Air Force pilot. "I've got 10,000 feet of runway, why wouldn't I use all of it?" I always said the Navy ones will get you down safely in any condition, but they WILL put that [darn] thing right down on the numbers every time. Every. Time.
It was an auto land not the pilot if it was bad fog
The Kuwait airlines really "Air dropped" 💀
Oh hell no 💀
You know them fuckers felt that landing lol
It seemed like a late landing.
Looked like a very smooth & controlled landing, the sort of landing done if reverse thrust is unavailable.
If any of you get the chance. The context that’s all over the screen tells what happened. And from what I can see.. that lil bounce is exhilarating for passengers lol def not a butter landing at all, and I’m sure someone complained.. because.. why not.. 😆😆😆
The rarest aviation video on RUclips - the ultra smooth landing. Thanks for including that one. I remember experiencing one such landing as a passenger. It was so soft that I could barely even perceive the landing. It was a little odd actually, because my brain had the impression that we were still in flight a couple feet off the runway when we had already touched down.
I like how the 747's wing vortices stack the engine contrails atop each other.
No. Next to each other. Not on top
....the conspiracy theorists will be loving those chem-trails !!
@@cspace1234nz You took the words right out of my mouth.
Though I don't see many of them around on this channel - they like to harass space and moon landing channels.
Although, they would probably pick up on you referring to them as 'chem-trails' and go, "Ah ha! Gotcha... so you admit they're _chem_ trails?"
@@cspace1234nz yeah, those were MAXIMUM chemtrails being laid down to, uuuhhh, subdue the populace or what the heck ever...
@@bmolitor615 ….population control 🤣🤣🤣
The first one looked like a wind shear scenario. With severe wind shear you can have max thrust applied and still be squashed back into the runway
You are right. I saw a Video from a Pilot and he explained that it was a Wind Shear and that could generate more (Uplift?). Its also possible that they Set some Thrust and so they can "Fly through the Wind Shear"
He definitely did not have thrust on
May be air braking as well?
@Jimbo that can happen, but not in this case. You can hear the engines are at an idle/low power setting.
@@MegaLaase if it was actual windshear then they would have highly likely got the warning earlier and performed a go around. Also, unless the auto throttle is u/s, it would have automatically set the thrust, which would be at idle during the flare.
The Delta landing was BUTTER
During the bank angle segment I was hoping to hear the “bank angle” “bank angle” annunciator. I just love that!🥰
right??? pretty sure all pilots in a real life emergencies hearing this feel the same!!!! 🥰🥰🥰🥰🥰 so soothing!!! 🥰🥰🥰🌈🌞🌞
same
@@tiguilherman_plays lmao
I'm glad you like the angle, Gwiyomi.
If you want to hear "bank angle" you might like this if you haven't come across it already.
That Delta landing was superb. It reminded me of the smoothest landing ever, about 25 years ago. I was working in Amsterdam and would be in the US on business a few times every year, invariably flying KLM 747s (nice) or Northwest DC-10s (not so much) from and to Schiphol. Wind at Schiphol is easily a bit difficult, but I nevertheless felt KLM and Northwest were a bit rough and ready, as in "landing is merely a means to an end." One time my return flight was overbooked and I was put on a Sabena A340 to Zaventem (Brussels), and I swear I could have built a house of cards that would have stayed upright all the way. I didn't realise we had touched down until I felt the front of the aircraft slowly lowering and then ... the lowering ... faded away. If somebody had told me it was Yehudi Menuhin landing the plane by bowing a Stradivarius with goose down ... I obviously wouldn't have believed it. But there would have been a nagging doubt. :-)
Delta guys are kings of the smooth landings
touched down like a butterfly with sore feet, as they say!
KLM Are the kings too.
Delta boys are a bunch of undisciplined cowboys.
@@wallyman292 who's they?
@@mark675 Those familiar with butterflies and their foot ailments, I imagine. . .
Schipol is scary in windy conditions. It’s very flat with some crazy gusts sometimes. Landed once where I was sure the wingtip would touch the ground, but luckily the pilot put us down safely 😮
All those runways and they always seem to use the worst one to use.
Lol OP has never been to GFK...
@@theglitch312 They use the polderbaan to minimise nuisance for nearby residents.
@@theglitch312not at all? They use the best runway for the wind conditions, and often prefer the polderbaan over the other runways because it minimises noise for residents even if the taxi time takes ages after that
The smoothest Delta landing I’ve seen.
Merry Christmas and thank for this year's best three minutes of aviation on RUclips. 🎅
Merry Christmas to you!
If anything, the Kuwait pilot was an accidental genius who managed to land in those conditions thanks to his mistake, all be it slightly harder than you’d like, but aye a landing where you’re on the runway in one piece, is a good landing!
Contrails dissipate fairly quickly....they don't hang around for hours and spread out into clouds.
Perhaps then, you can give us the 'science' of why a condensation is required to dissipate fairly quickly?
Merry Christmas and thanks for all your videos you have filmed for all of us around the world
Your videos have gotten better throughout the year.
I don’t think for one second a pilot ‘forgot’ to either activate TOGA or manually move the throttles after confirming go around. It was just a flaky landing.
Google Emirates 521.
Delta was quite a beautiful landing.
Thank you for sharing these beautiful aircraft flying..
That A350 landing was pure 🧈
Very similar to the Emirates 777‘s incident.
Absolutely correct, but this time the pilots were lucky enough that the main gears touched down and started braking...
just curious, how does one know if the pilot really wanted to do a go around in the first video?
Unusually high nose attitude during flare. If it was landing after the initial seconds they would slowly put the nose down but as seen in the video the nose was kept up which is when you want to go around
@@strato6049 Not necessarily. He might have been wanting to have a smooth landing. Not a good idea on a wet runway due to risk of aqua planning. We actually want a firm landing to break the surface tension and have control. Firm, but not hard. If we go around we press TO/GA buttons on the throttles which in this aircraft automatically advances the throttles. So no, the pilots did not want to go around in all likelihood. Should they have gone around? That is the question. Its hard to say from this video but normally we land in the touchdown zone markings. 9 times out of 10 if we haven't landed by the end of the markings we would go around, especially if the runway is wet. But Captains discretion came into effect here and I am sure a good debrief afterwards.
Love them buttery smooth landings 😎
In regards to your comment about contrails. They're formed when the exhaust meets high water vapor in the atmosphere that didn't turn into a cloud yet as the super-cooled water vapor didn't have a chance to freeze onto condensation nuclei.
Wow!! A perfect landing, now that's a rarity, lol 👍👍👍
That Kuwait landing looked pretty good to me
That 747 bit was magical. TY!
Season’s Greetings to all!
Thanks for all the uploads 👍
Merry Christmas!
When I do a long haul flight in my sim, getting a smooth landing is the most satisfying feeling ever.
Oh ok thanks
I see you replaced the audio from that Schiphol "landing", there are two videos of it and it looks like the clip here uses the audio from the other capture. The original audio features someone astonished by what the pilots did, going "What the fuuuuck! What the fuck was that?!!". Great content as always! This channel is so consistent in its quality.
@1:35 that was really rude of the aircraft to start calling the pilot such awful names. I mean he was doing his best it was really windy!
so early don't know what to comment except I missed aerosucre here
It looked like a normal landing. Very hard to forget thrust during a go around as they just select TOGA.
An Emirates crew did the same with slightly worse outcomes.
@@athgt6630 Exactly.
Yup. Looks to me like it he flared it to slow down faster and drop the wheels a bit harder to break through the water on the runway.
@@athgt6630 The Emirates crew did select TOGA, but on the 777 it doesn't always activate thrust when doing so.
I’d like to see the pilots response to this kids summery of the video.
I highly doubt they were going around but I mean the kids who make these videos always jump to conclusions without any credible source 😂
I don't think that was intended to be a go around, just a steep flare. Just my opinion
The Volaris go-around was on approach to RWY 05R at Mexico City. Winds there can get kinda tricky.
It was entirely fictitious as it was a computer game not reality.
I dont believe the first one was a go around attempt. Looked like a very high flare. One does not “forget” go around thrust.
Right, especially with 2 or even 3 pilots in the cockpit.
How do you know it was an attempted go-around?
Thank you for posting your comment. You hit the nail on the head. He doesn’t know, but he thinks he knows, and is too arrogant to ask for comments to provide possible explanations.
@@markabb1 The fact that the plane was no longer descending in the way it should for a normal landing would be the first clue.
There's also the fact that someone could have... you know... told him it was. There's like a million ways you could know.
@@hughjass1044 There's also many reasons for vertical speed to bottom out resulting in a float. Occam's razor
@@outermarker5801 Entities should not be unnecessarily be multiplied or the hypothesis making the fewest assumptions is generally more likely to be correct? A trained pilot forgetting to program TOGA and advance the throttles makes more assumptions than a mistimed flare.
No further information in the source video, other than a lot of swearing.
@@jiubboatman9352 Exactly. Where anyone gets the gargantuan mental leap 'attempted go around, forgot TO/GA' from is beyond me 🤷♂️
Maybe the uploader was in the jump seat and saw it all 🤣
Isn't the Volaris a flight simulator video?
Love that the content mentioned in title is always the first clip. Pure RUclips orgasms there.
that delta landing was absolute fire.
That Delta landing is one of the landings ever
really?
Volaris A321 landed with +10kt tailwind when at 20' (according to what I see on the MFD)...exceeding the landing tailwind limitation of 10kts. Good call to go-around albeit too late, IMO.
At 20' it looks more like the wind has swung around to the right, then becomes a headwind very shortly after. SOP is generally to use the reported tower wind, though, not the instantaneous annunciated wind from the ND (although you could decide to go around for that reason if you decide it's in the interest of safety). Agree that they could have gone around earlier, though. They were well above profile over the threshold. (Being pedantic, MFD is a Boeing thing. On the Airbus that's the ND)
It was a game rather than an actual event
@James Walkington No, it wasn't. That's real lol :D
They were high, should be 50ft over the threshold, and most probably they saw that it's gonna be a landing outside of the touchdown zone if they continue, so decision was made to go around. Had exactly the same situation during the first flight with the passengers
Hey, December 24, and here's a new video for us! Thank you and Merry Xmas!!!
Man i love the A350!😊
Just a quick note - the Kuwait B777 is not attempting a G/A - its just doing a long flare..... and the Volaris A321 is not encountering any windshift - they are doing and non-precision (non ILS) approach, and with a bit of tailwind it seems - they get long in the flare and decide to G/A at the end of the touchdown zone - just as they should and the G/A seems to be executed very nicely.
If the Volaris really did encounter a windshear, the annunciator for that must have been broken and they would have done the wrong procedure, as the PF called for go-around flaps. In a windshear encounter you would not change the config while going around. So probably just a normal go-around... but that doesn't sound so catchy....
You know you flare perfectly when both main gears are perpendicular to the runway during landing. A350-900 only and B767s main gears are tilt forward to accommodate gear retraction and lock into the wheel well.
The A380 too has forward tilted main gears.
@@aviationtrips The A380 main gear config is nice, the 2 outer are tilted forward but the 2 inner are tilted slightly back, meaning on the flare there's a nice "wedge" where both sets of gears slowly flatten out giving a very nice cushion effect
Glad I watched until the end, that 747-400 contrail video is awesome, never seen it from above like that. Does anyone know when that was filmed or can link the original video?
Wow 🤩 nice landing Delta 👍
2:16 closed windows. What were the flight attendant doing
Defending themselves.
Just curious, how do you know the first plane was trying to go around? Looked to me like he just broke out of the fog, flared a bit much, and floated.
He doesn’t know. You can clearly hear (or not, actually) that the engines are spooled down.
The plane’s attitude is way too high to be a normal flare for landing.
Also, you will usually see the nose lower a little bit if the plane floated. Here it seems the pilot was trying to make the plane climb and probably had the yoke all the way back for the entire video. (777 do have anti-tail strike system which will limit the attitude when close to the ground)
@@tonamg53 Why would anybody try to go around by pitching up but not also add power? All they would have had to do is hit TOGA on the throttle. Besides, when airliners go around, they pitch up to around 15 degrees. This plane is less than 10 at best. When you break out at minimums and go visual it does weird things to your brain. Airliners don't stall into the runway, they fly into it. With the extra speed they carry, a few degrees of extra flare with throttle off would produce the exact situation I see here, a plane floating a bit too far and dropping as it runs out of air speed.
@@tonamg53 1) if he was trying to climb then he would have applied thrust, 2) lowering the nose when you are floating is an absolute no, which they teach you in your initial PPL training already, 3) not all 777s have tail strike protection.
@@keithhendrickson8522 Btw, the 777 300 ER will tail strike at 10 degrees pitch when on the ground.
So yes with the tail strike protection… It will only allow the pilot to pull just under 10 degrees pitch max at that height.
Normal lift off pitch for 777-300ER is 8.5 degrees and 14 degrees at V2+15… meaning the plane is usually already around 100 feet or more above ground at 15 degrees pitch.
Touch down pitch is usually less than 3 degrees, around 5-6 degrees if you fuk up or extreme weather condition. More than 6 degrees and the pilot monitoring probably will think you are trying to go around without telling him…
Perfect landing from DELTA!
2:40 Chemtrails confirmed!!!!!!
2:40 Condensation trails confirmed!!!!!!
There, fixed your mistake.
You're welcome.
@@sailorman8668 Yeah, right. Belive what you want sheeple.
The Airbus A350 is a fantastic aircraft. According to the motto: If it looks right, it flies right!
Form follows function! She is a beautiful airliner.
I believe that is a derivation of a saying that comes from sailing where the phrase is: "If she looks fast, she is fast".
Was that an intentionally smooth landing, or did it float a little? Looked like the flare was a bit slight, and touchdown was delayed many seconds afterward.
Definitely floated. Very smooth landing tho, but you can see that he missed the touchdown zone by a few 100 feet!
Notice how the contrails (2:33) from the outboard engines wrap around and over the contrails from the inboard engines. That's a strong clue about how wings generate lift.
the foil hat wearers will only believe those are chemtrails
2:30 That’s why planes should have four engines 😃
As an ATPL student: that was not a Go Around, just a bad landing. Pilot tried to flare for too long
Surprised about the Delta landing, landings in AMS can get quite rocky quite often.
Just came off a Delta a350. One of the smoothest landings I've had and they also didnt have to use reverse thrust! Guess the runway turnoff was well down the way.
If you were to run the stopping distance numbers on a landing where you use reversers and autobrake vs just an autobreak landing with no reversers the difference is very little. What the reverse thrust actually does is assists the auto break.
The autobreak will need to use less applications to get you stopped when revers thrust is engaged, thus you can save on brake wear.....but stopping distance is much the same.
The use of reverse thrust can often come down to directives from the company....some companies prefer you put the load on the engine and use revers thrust, others prefer you try avoid using reverse thrust and wear down the breaks quicker.....the accountants can answer that part.
@@Relmwood good to know! Haha
Its so quiet inside an A350, that it feels like its in space or something.
I'm so glad this channel doesn't just show aviation F-ups.
The Kuwait airplane did not forget go around thrust. They flew through a localized heavy downdraft and or Microburst. They held pitch attitude. Once clear of the weather on the other side the airplane will lose significant performance and will then drop to the runway. To Avoid a tailstrike the pilot lowered the nose and let the mains touch and landed. The argument here could be that they should have just performed a go around rather than try to "save" the landing. This visibility was probably poor and the pilot may have lost sight of the runway momentarily
That looks like a landing not a Go-around
3 Minutes of Aviation, 3 minutes ago!
Aerosucre…. I miss you! ❤️
That Delta landing looked to me like it used up a lot of runway and only touched down at the very end of the touchdown zone. Perhaps holding it off in order to make the landing as smooth as possible but in the meantime landing long. As a passenger it gets top marks but as a pilot I'd take a firm landing in the right spot over a smooth touchdown half way down the runway anyday.
First video just appears to be a normal landing, what makes this a failed go around attempt?
I agree. It looked as though there was a lot of aerodynamic braking involved, but I don't think it was a go around. Maybe, the pilot changed their mind and just decided to land.
Merry Christmas!
Merry Xmas! 😁👍
Sincere question: Does the publisher know it was to be a go-around because of ATC communications, or because of something visible? My minimal understanding makes me think there are no flaps extended, which they would be in either a landing or go around.
Great video
What's a flare guys? I have an idea but I'd like to know for sure. 🤷🤔😁
raise the nose before touching down with your main landing gear first.
How to flare nostrils:
Nasal flaring occurs when the nostrils widen while breathing. It is often a sign of trouble breathing. Nasal flaring may be an indication of breathing difficulty, or even respiratory distress in infants. Check for airway obstructions, and call a health care provider.
you are welcome mate!
@@ImperialDiecast ;-)
just before landing pilots raise the nose of the aircraft so make sure they land smoothly and also so that the main gear touches the ground before the nose gear, because all at once is quite bad for the aircraft structurally
Flaring means increasing angle af attack (raising the aircrafts nose) to reduce sink speed before touchdown. Ideally the main gear just kisses the runway with sink speed almost zero.
It also bleeds off the last bit of overspeed to make sure the plane stays down once it has touched down.
1st one is no Go around
Exactly, normal landing. There is a setting -TOGA (take off, go around) which is selected to initiate a go around and the thrust is set automatically. Sometimes the captions with these videos are pure rubbish.
@@philblinkhorn8304 true
That Delta landing was absolute butter.
Smoothest landing for me: Delta 727 35 years ago. There might be some nostalgia mixed into that memory, but it was butter for sure.
I can remember as a kid boarding 727's by the rear staircase, pretty cool as a kid!
Smoothest for me was a LH A330-300 from KWI to FRA in August 2018.
How do you forget to apply thrust during a go round, how?
Ask Emirates
Ok update: it seems like they just had issues with the ground effect. So they had to kinda stall the aircraft in order to touch down bc ground effect is an asshole sometimes.
@@nikitaflorentz3988 This makes some sense!
Don’t take anything this channel claims as true.
Fun fact, those A350 pilots felt 2.55 G during that turn!
no, just when he lost no altitude
@@mob1235 You wouldn't want to roll into a 67-degree bank and loose altitude. Recipe for a spiral dive.
@@coriscotupi bullshit its rather the recipe if you pull 2.55 G
@@mob1235 That airplane is perfectly capable of pulling 2.55g.
@@mob1235 well the reason why 67°is the max bank angle is due to the fact that all large commercial planes(cs25 certification) have to be able to pull 2.5g, whether it be the a350 or 737. And 67°bank angle is where the plane will be pulling 2.5g (1/cos66.5 = 2.5g)
You could smooth buttercream on a cake with that Delta landing;)
nice landing delta
747 spitting out them chemtrails!!
Don’t. You’ll get the tinfoil hat people all triggered.😂
The first one definitely wasn’t a go around , just a standard landing but hard
How come most landings are normally captured from left to right on our screens? I have noted this after watching the Delta landing in the opposite direction which is very rare on spotting channels.
Until just now, I’ve never noticed or even thought about it…🤔
That was one hell of a rough landing sheesh
You owe us 7 seconds of aviation
original comment bro, never heard this before, not once 🤏
1:33 why is the plane insulting the pilots like that??
its a common feature to teach overpaid pilots in the world a lesson to be more humble. they often come on too strong showing off so AI was a good solution to tell them at each landing how bad they actually are. is good for the ego THRUST me!
"retard" just means to set the thrust to idle, so the plane uses the rest of its cinetic energy to float down to the runway. It just should be a clear instruction from the plane, so it is possibly not overheared or just ignored.
The plane is telling them to retard(reduce) the amount of power (throttle).
Chef's kiss for that Delta pilot!
As a flight attendant, as much as I appreciate the A350 butter landing, the amount of window shades I see closed for landing is triggering
The Volaris jet has a tailwind of 14kts on final resulting in a ground speed of over 170kts. Despite the high field elevation and density altitude at Mexico City, he is exceeding the landing limitations of the aircraft set forth by the manufacturer, therefore he should go around as the runway disappears really fast otherwise.
Nonsense. The tailwind component at the start was 13 knots. I didn’t see it get any higher than that. Max FCOM tailwind component on landing is 15 knots in a 321 (company restrictions might be lower which may have been a factor here). The ground speed being 170 is knots is high but that’s normal for high elevation airfields where the air is thinner. It seems the tailwind dropped off a bit in the flare and PF over corrected a bit and started climbing again. You can actually see this on the PFD where the VSI needle starts climbing.The PF obviously wasn’t happy with this and decided the best option was simply to Go Around rather than landing long outside the TDZ. At no point was the aircraft “exceeding limitations set forth by the manufacturer”.
@@VmcgHD Maybe according to your FCOM, but our ops specs are FAA limitations, and that value is 10kts. So, when your in the hearing discussing a runway over-run or excursion, FOQA data would suggest non-compliance. Nonsense or not...
@@brimopm My FCOM (A321 NEO) says 15 knots. As does Airbus’. I can’t remember what the A321 CEO had but it was 10 knots. This did change a few years ago though IIRC. What operators impose on their crews is up to them. Hence my comment in parentheses. If the Volaris crew exceeded their company limitations, they did the right thing. My point being was your original comment implied they had broken some manufacturer limitation. They didn’t. At least none that I know of. If they exceeded a company limitation that’s different. Their train set, their rules. But thanks for the clarity on FAA restrictions. Again local regulations change the situation and what is, or is not allowed.
When TOGA becomes NO-GO...
Came here to say similar. I wonder if TOGA wasn't pushed, or did it not work?
Merry Christmas everyone
That Delta pilot defined "Butter Landing"
why do planes always call the pilots retard... I'd like to know why planes are so mean...
2:40 Contrails are formed when the World government lizard people want to dose us with mind control drugs! (at 30,000 feet, rather than just putting it into our food and water)
All hail our scaly green overlords!
I swear I’ve had that dealt a pilot before lol so smooth I didn’t even know we were on the ground haha
This delta landing, 10/10
Yeah check out all those chemtrails I mean contrails in the background 246...
"Condensation trails"
it's not a bad idea to use the whole term instead of just "conds" because people who watch this but aren't in the aviation bubble might find this useful
yea, right.
hoooold on i will quickly get the popcorn while all the conspiracy keyboard warriors are getting ready to tell us the "REAL" reason. 🤣
@@cloudpandarism2627 You are fully boosted right mate?!
@@christopher-bj8de no clue what you mean but yes. me boosted. my car is boosted for sure. my cat when i throw stuff and he is chasing it. you should see that. tears of joy would flow down your face. its just too beautiful...