Plane Landing Goes Wrong
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 27 дек 2022
- Enjoy this episode of 3 Minutes of Aviation!
✈ SOURCES / FURTHER INFORMATION
Virgin Atlantic Airbus A330 go around during storm
Video by Jack G.
Airbus A350-1000 takeoff test with engine failure
• Airbus A350-1041 Airbu...
Neos Boeing 767 compressor stalls after takeoff
• Fuego al despegar
Virgin A330 rejected takeoff, causing go around
• Rejected takeoff…Virgi...
✈ BECOME PART OF THE CHANNEL
Merch Store - teespring.com/stores/3-minute...
✈ CONTACT ME
Submit videos, give feedback, ask questions - 3minutesofaviation@gmail.com
If you liked the video, please subscribe and turn on notifications - I appreciate it! 
Наука
Your definition of "goes wrong" is different from mine. The pilots were fighting a very strong cross wind and decided to go around, which was the right decision in my opinion. Nothing wrong with that.
Second That !!
yeah, thats my only annoyance with this channel. If someone breathed slightly too heavy they'd caption it with "person struggling to breathe barely makes it out alive"
The "goes wrong" part is quite obvious to me. The aircraft doesn't land on their first go therfore having to initiate a go around.
@@gabrielmihet Happens all the time in bad weather very glad he "goes wrong " and went around.
@blackvulcan100 what you mean "he goes wrong" as in the pic?
This is a good example of “The A330 either butter’s or it doesn’t land”
why an argument in every comment section?
I agree
The best example I have seen
Unless it’s Ryanair
So weird to me to call it butter. Only on RUclips. Never heard it. Greaser yes. Butter no.
The only issue is that there's no apostrophe in _butters it._ But _lands like butter_ is a perfectly natural expression.
Imagine looking over beautiful Barcelona, then KA-BAM
Me, on that Ryanair 737: OMG did you SEE that Airbus almost hit the ground with his wing? Amazing!
Ryanair Stewardess: That'll be a €19.99 surcharge for unplanned inflight entertainment then, how would you like to pay, Sir?
Your own fault for even thinking about flying Ryanair!🤣
Lol
@@Anmeteor9663 What is this Ryanair hate? I've probably flown them twenty times, never had any issues. It's not luxurious by any means, but it get's you from A to B on time.
Gosh yeah, I flew from Liverpool to Krakow no problem but on the way back I got charged for my carry-on. The same I took on outward flight with no issues they charged for on inward. Needless to say a stern email was sent right after
@@Mats-Hansen They'll get you from A to B on time, or not at all.
Don't expect any assistance what so ever if there's the least little problem. Even at Stanstead (the Ryanair hub) the poor sap sat under a sign marked INFO couldn't as much as direct me to the nearest cyber cafe so that I could log on their website, find a suitable flight, buy a ticket, find somewhere to print a boarding card ..
The NEOS 767 just can't seem to get that left afterburner to light :)
Comercial planes have no afterburners...
@@1zanglang u seriously didn’t get the joke? 😳
@@1zanglang Tell us you didn't get the joke without telling us you didn't get the joke :)
@@1zanglang that one did, couldn't you see the fire ?
1:44 Nah bro, that's just the new anti lag from Boeing..
"Boeing 767 Neo" that's how I read it...
Underrated comment, BuT aCsHuAlLy it should be called a P&W anti-lag
They added such a feature in MD 81 for a stupid reason, before taking over Boeing. Look up the Gottröra incident.
Idk why but I'm always fascinated by the tests they go through. Things I never would have thought of. Love this channel.
That last clip though...
It always blows my mind that even a single engine can lift one of these huge birds into the air!
So cool, dass es in der Schweiz war!
Structure:- m i joke to you?
That A350's takeoff had pure Aerosucre style!
Honestly it’s a great the pilots made the decision to go around on the first clip, that looks like a very rocky landing, it would’ve definitely gone wrong had they made the choice to land.
Poor passengers probably panicking 😅
"probably" 🙈 😧 🙈
@@tonyt8805 definitely an understatement 😭😭
A good crew always leave that go around in their back pocket, ready to use at moments notice.
Well done captain and crew 👍
Some pretty good stuff here.
YES after my 12 years of existence, something interesting has finally happened at Manchester, my nearest airport
Be healthy and live 100 years! How nice that a child looks at airplanes and not just at war games!
@@iuliandragomir1 tbf Fortnite and stuff like that is reaaalllly bad rn
@@froggy251 You will have more bad things in your live! Happy new Year!❤❤❤
Unfortunate
@@iuliandragomir1 imma be 12 in like 2 months. Love planes!
This channels is great!
Props to all the pilots of these aircraft; training and skills go along way to protect the flying public.
Great videos 😊
I love during the go around when the plane is all wobbly on the deceleration, that as soon as it goes back to full power for the go around, the power and gyroscope of the engines instantly stabilizes the plane.
I was on virgin atlantic a330-300neo a month ago. It’s good I wasn’t on that one!!
I’ve been following this series for a year now. Keep up the good work!!!
Man, the possibilities if ... the last clip took place on a foggy day, and the control tower purposely tells the Etihad pilot that the runway is clear for landing ...
@WRIGHT-SAMUEL04oh. that makes sense
@WRIGHT-SAMUEL04 ok. good to know!
The outro music is truly the best
I live for the intro music!❤
Oh my, I'm sorry.
Outro music gang for life!
You must be 12
Edit: 8
The music is so horrible
Seriously....
A stabilised approach seems a little bit relative when storms start pushing the heavies around.
I have a different definition of "goes wrong"
It seemed to me that both engines had exhaust on that simulated engine loss.
at 74 years old this is the best part of the day (other than watching dentures soak)...thanks for sharing
I was there when there was a testflight of the a350 ! Basel-Mulhouse is my home airport
That A350-1000 that's supposed to be taking off with a simulated engine failure---why is there clear and obvious exhaust coming from BOTH engines as it climbs out? Look at the video starting at 1:28, with a noticeable couple of puffs of exhaust at around 1:31, and really obvious heated exhaust plumes from both engines from 1:35 to 1:38. It doesn't look like a simulated engine out procedure to me...any explanation as to why both engines seem to be running at high output?
Because it’s simulated
Loved the sound of the Virgin's engines spooling up 😍
Doesn’t have to do anything with the fact that it’s from Virgin
@@ZeroGravity23 Actually it does, as I am a huge lifelong fan of the Virgin brand
@@masr8875 Then explain
The pilots,engineers and designers should be applauded for the advancements in technology and skills that it takes to do certain things in planes that keep all of us and themselves safe when flying in one of these incredible machines.
The weather in Manchester is almost always grey wet and windy so they're used to landing in strong crosswinds.
Wow windy day at least it landed
Virgin Atlantic a330 saw the Ryanair parked next to the runway and was inspired .
The more often I watch these video, the less keen I am on flying.
would the Etihad really have been able to land if the virgin a330 didn't suffer a rejected take off? just seems really close.....I know planes land and take off every 45 seconds from Heathrow but always assumed that was utilising both runways. Either way pretty impressive stuff!
The rejected takeoff was probably from ATC, who realized it was too close to flirt with an incursion.
without getting into it too much, the video is cut. once the Virgin stops there's a cut in the video. It then shows the one going around.
Generally if you clear a plane for take off and its rolling by the time the inbound is at 3nm it will work (using basic assumption. There are of course a million factors that can change what I just said.).
@@MW-zm8sd Good catch on the clever editing in the video. That said, after the cut, the video still shows the plane in the same position on the runway, and then pans to the plane going around. So, one can infer that the one caused the other. But you are correct that a clearance is almost never revoked. But mistakes regarding incursions do happen... just not very often.
@@MW-zm8sd ah yeah! You’re right, just noticed the cut as well. Thanks
Yeah I'm sure the caption was backwards, takeoff rejected by tower due to 787 on top of them!
What happened to the Virgin Airbus A330 Low speed rejected take-off? Engine fail?
Top Class Pilots!
Wasn’t even close to a wing strike, simply went around because of instability, very routine. The rejected takeoff wasn’t, it was a clearance cancellation due to separation issues.
Hi bro! Nice video bro... Continue with the same spirit. Well, l've seen towards the end of your videos, there is an option to watch the next video, how do you that bro, kindly?
Thanks.
First time: near wing strike...
Second time: butter landing, and in the same conditions than before
Хорошо, чо на второй ушел. Молодец! А помпаж двигателя- как они сели то?
Looks like that was landing on 23R ... many years ago (pre second runway) I witnessed a BA 747 arrival (Islamabad) on 06 (much more prone to windshear) the roll was so bad that No1 engine struck the ground. I reported the damage when I met the aircraft to provide fuel service.
I would like to see the Metar of that day in Manchester
I'm a nervous flyer. I would have died listening to that popping engine on the NEOS 767 lol
Is Aerosucre on vacation? Asking for a friend.... 😂
Not even close to a wingstrike. But I could tell you a story about being in an A340 and trying to land in HKG just after a hurricane went through there.
I liked the part with the airplanes.
I know the A350-1000 from somewhere :P
Thank you ;-)
From Airbus
This Video is filmed by Laurent my friend!!! You use Videos of other Users…!
@@_sebastiandomi_ Yes, this channel's video compilations use videos taken by other people. If you look at the description you'll see the original videos credited.
What exactly went wrong according to your opinion?
My left ear enjoyed that.
Didn't see any near wing strike on the Virgin.
They love to over exaggerate in their video titles. Just need to call it what it is!! We’ll still watch it 👍
Turned off tail light illumining “Virgin” on 2nd approach?
Engine failures must be more common than we think. Glad the pilots have the training and the planes are designed to handle that!
Depends on how often you think they fail.
What wing strike ?
1:50 god that sound gives me anxiety idk why
oh...no!!!
I would have been terrified as a passenger on the first clip.
Ryanair: I'm everywhere
That Ryanair plane on the taxiway, watching the Virgin A330 land: “pfff…they got nothin’ on us”
Interesting in the V1 engine failure simulation 1:25 the pilot does not climb much, wait for the plane to get more speed, you can see the plane yaw because of one engine, and only when he has reached enough speed, _THEN_ he goes into a positive climb. Very instructive!
Look at the exhaust.
Both engine producing full power right before the steep climb.
@@hotrodray6802 - The technique the pilot used was to get the speed up with one engine before increasing the climb. Nothing in the video contradicts that.
That’s not the prescribed technique
@@kickedinthecalfbyacow7549 - Please, tell me what it is.
With a smaller plane taking off on grass (especially if it is tall or thick), there is a technique to get the plane off the ground as quickly as possible and lowest speed, then go level until you get it up, then climb. That's just an example, it depends on whatever situation you are faced with. If an engine fails after V1, you are going to have a problem, get the speed up so you can get a positive climb. Of course, the length of the runway and possibly other things, but that is why we still have pilots to make decisions.
I have actually done this in simulator, but not in a real plane.
@@D800Lover no. That is not correct. Feel free to search how airliners fly EFATO
If only car drivers had the same presence of mind as airline pilots. Split-second TOGA decisions are really impressive. Far too many drivers think, "I can do this. Yeah. No problem. Here we go... " and then regret it.
1:28 The Power of Rolls Royce Engine!
Just as well it wasn't an Aerosucre plane coming in behind the Virgin (rejected) take-off. Saying that Aerosucre would probably touch down halfway down the runway so it might have missed anyway!
ryanair just had to make a double appearance
The A330 is very tricky to land EMPTY in strong xwind.. I guess this is the case where Its empty and for sure strong xwinds!
/A330 Pilot
Is that the same Virgin Atlantic plane? That plane gets into a lot of trouble.
Wow
The Virgin was unstable then wind shear, werent it
one little line comes loose and there is no saving it. one small part malfunctions
ryanair be like ah we lost 2 engines oh nvm we only need to arrive and not to land
I think the Virgin pilot saw the RyanAir jet and was like, "Oh hell no, I'll wait."
last video virgin pilot: ''what did i do wrong???''
hmmm, tis is not ladings,. tis ist arrivals :-D
poor etihad😢
That looks like me playing flight simulator on roblox 😂
*computer voice:* minimums
Pilot: Bet you can't land a wildly unstabilized approach in gusty crosswinds
Copilot: hold my beer
Pilot: *presses toga* we both failed this checkride
😂😂
First time no Coloumbia
Watching aviation videos is always fun. However, there was nothing here in this video to justify the captions.
Aerosucre meanwhile is having a party, they weren't in this video!
A330: Fuck, too slow, try again.
787-9: Bruh..
0:45 Manchester, where all the rubbish weather is in UK
Wowzza..Neos and Boeing…in the same sentence?
Not even close to a wing strike, spare the melodrama!
why it a different time of day for that first go around 🤣🤣🤣
What is V!?
that last one was not rejected. That was a air traffic control issues for sure
Why did the A350 kept the gear down? Seems to me that whit reduced power you would want to get the gear up sooner. May it be to avoid the extra drag of the gear doors?
I assume they were testing worst case scenario.
At least for the 747, there is additional drag while the gear is being retracted. The standard procedure is to keep it down. Might be it is the same here.
Test/certification flights almost always leave the gear down. Just one less variable to think about on the first flights if the gear will come down and not jam or get stuck in the retracted position.
@@mreese8764 no there is not. Standard procedure is to raise the gear as soon as possible. We never keep the gear down.
@@kuebbisch only on the very first flight. This was single engine testing. They wouldn’t be worried about the gear being able to work or not. This is more like worst case scenario.
Did anyone else see a near wing tip strike in the first clip? I sure didn't.....
its because of the ryanair plane, it gave them advice
never got to fly virgin. a shame they are no longer around.
Thankfully, nobody was injured.
I'm thinking somebody rushed the Virgin and the 787 had to pull out...
That was not even close to the ground, In the mid 70's I watched a landing from my window seat where the wing came as close as 8 to 12 feet off the ground as the plane touched down.
That first clip had too many pixels. I could have used less, I could still tell that it was an airplane.
Was the first and the last clip the SAME Aircraft?? 😂
Landing gear stayed down
You owe me 3 seconds of aviation
Thought the A350 engine would be more powerful and I’m sure that aircraft was empty!
1. They’re likely only using flex thrust which would largely account for any low weight.
2. They are also likely using ballast to keep the weight realistic anyway.
The A350 had both engines running… I know it was a simulation so likely at idle, but still…
being early and having the urge to comment...
I think your take on the last one was wrong. I think the landing aircraft got to close to the A330 which had not started it's takenoff run. Once the A330 started it was decided that it would not be clear for the landing aircraft to continue so it did a go around at which point the A330 was ordered to abort it's take off. Landing in the jet wash of an A330 is not a good thing to try if you don't have to.
It could've gone worse.