2024-2025 Cadillac Lyriq EV NHTSA Full-Overlap Frontal Crash Test

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 19 окт 2024

Комментарии • 13

  • @jamesengland7461
    @jamesengland7461 12 дней назад +6

    Excellent structure

    • @Wasabi9111
      @Wasabi9111 12 дней назад +2

      But it only got 4* for the pass on this basic test. Kinda disappointing for a brand new design. Why can’t GM build top crash performing cars?

    • @SuperBooboo02
      @SuperBooboo02 11 дней назад +2

      @@Wasabi9111 overall it got five stars...

    • @Wasabi9111
      @Wasabi9111 10 дней назад +1

      @@SuperBooboo02but this is a brand new structure. Almost every other car receives 5 stars. It’s just not excusable.

  • @rustlesee
    @rustlesee 10 дней назад +2

    04:32, GM used to make fun of Ford for using aluminum in the redesigned F150. Glad to see they have come around and changed their mind on it.

    • @bahamatodd
      @bahamatodd 10 дней назад +2

      Not much has changed for the Silverado at least. GM still uses steel for major structural components and body panels. Aluminum is only used in moving panels like the doors and hood.

  • @caumsettpark
    @caumsettpark 10 дней назад

    Was the 2024 Cadillac Lyriq tested above equipped with seatbelt pretensioners at all seating locations?
    The 2024 GM Order Guide does not show this feature for the Lyriq.
    The 2025 GM Order Guide for the Cadillac Lyriq however, does show standard seat belt pretensioners for the rear seat occupants only. If I am correct, and I am not positive that I am; why is this important safety feature not available for the front seat driver and passenger? It seems based on the above video, the device would certainly have helped contain the rapid forward movement of the test dummies.
    Strange, but the 2025 Order Guide shows that the Chevy Blazer EV has seat belt pretensioners standard for front and rear passengers and standard for rear passengers only on the Chevy Equinox EV.

    • @divineoracle4809
      @divineoracle4809 8 дней назад

      Now that the IIHS is testing rear occupant safety in frontal crashes (this just started in the last year), we are definitely going to see more rear seat pretensioners and rear seat safety equipment 🙏 that is probably why GM is starting to add this stuff for the upcoming model year, they don't want their car to fail where others are passing
      I totally agree with you, rear seat pretensioners are a must, and should be mandated in all new cars. Rear seat protection is lacking without them

  • @SoniaDiaz-zo4wr
    @SoniaDiaz-zo4wr 7 дней назад

    I have a Tesla and next car is a Lyriq.

  • @billiebobbienorton2556
    @billiebobbienorton2556 9 дней назад +1

    @5:15 I can see Jesus face in the driver's side air bag ! ! ! ! ✝✝✝✝✝✝

  • @thewiseguy3529
    @thewiseguy3529 9 дней назад +1

    What happens when the batteries explode

    • @МиГ29-с7д
      @МиГ29-с7д 9 дней назад

      You aren't funny.

    • @CarPro1993
      @CarPro1993  9 дней назад +4

      @@thewiseguy3529 So far to date, a post-crash-test fire has only occurred once. In late 2011, a Chevrolet Volt underwent a side pole crash test. While the vehicle was sitting in a holding yard, three weeks after the test, the vehicle caught fire. A post-crash fire has not occurred at a testing facility since, as far as I know of.