@@JahongHur not really. Tesla is known for making safe cars. There have already been crashes in the CT and every time the driver/passengers just walked away
Do you like these crash tests? Note that the previous frontal crash tests were performed at 64 km/h. In these recordings the speed of the cars being tested is 50 km/h. That's a huge difference!
@@aaronlandry3934most evs have batteries in the center and they also have a crash absorber protecting them, as well as a safety system that automatically isolates the battery (basically just cutting the power to the battery)
The batteries of electric cars no longer explode and no longer burn, current electric cars are really safe and very secure, more secure than current gasoline cars
The batteries can catch fire, but you’d have to abuse it or damage it a ton in order for that to happen. Nonetheless, I believe they are safer than ICE cars because of the weight of the vehicle preventing it from flying through the air like a ball and the fact they’re less likely to catch fire.
@@CellPhonzRockEnterprises Yes you are totally right, I expressed myself badly at first, car batteries can catch fire, but new cars are really very safe because it almost never happens. Critics of the electric car say that electric cars are exploding, the first electric car marketed had this problem, the first generation of Tesla model S could catch fire after an accident, but it was more than 10 years ago, today research and technology has evolved so much that the risk of fire is extremely rare!
I really like the Ioniq 6, but the test results don't seem to match up with the potential damage we see in the cabin. 97% seems relatively high considering some of these other cars have airbags that deploy all around the cabin to prevent heads going through the window even for passengers.
I didn't know Tesla had any median airbags like between seats, and on the frame close to the ceilling... cocoon like. Wow! Must be alien tech. Tesla excells with the highest safety score. 🤯
BYD atto3 are regareded as mid-low end car in China, please test Byd HAN，Xiaomi SU7 or ET7, they are actual competitors o Tesla for the same price range
Notice with the pole test, there is only the driver in the front EXCEPT when the car has centre airbags. They probably don't want to show 2 heads banging against each other (or it causes too much damage to their equipment) ?
Bought a byd seagull months ago! A great car for driving around the city, especially because there are several completely free charging stations here in Brazil! The only use for our SUV here at home is for traveling!
I'm really impressed how fast those airbags deploy. Deployed in 2 camera frames on average. Then they deflate pretty quick. You don't want to get burnt from a burning hot airbag against you. I was impressed those expensive Porsche cars were tested. Good of Porsche to donate those cars. It's worth the loss to get a good safety rating. For all these brands/models tested. An above average safety rating will sell more cars. Yeah I was baited with the thumbnail pic of the Cybertruck. Closing comment. These tests are all about passenger protection and were done with, (I would describe it), a dry car. So there was no chance of batteries getting damaged resulting in an electrical fire. That kind of testing is someone else's job.
I agree this is the actual car interior. That white mark on the steering wheel that LOOKS similar to polestar logo is I think a mark put on by the techs for the test
Idk about y'all, but the Hyundai ionic 5 & 6 have HORRIBLE A pillars. None of the other cars had a single pillar crumble, but on the Hyundai cars, they start to fold, this is as bad as a 80's car!
the speed limit on frontal vehicle-to-vehicle crash test should be regulated to 68.3 km/h instead of 50.0 km/h . . . based on real world crash data . . .
I guess that 50% offset must be a Chiense standard on its own then. I thought it was copied from the west where they have two car weight within 90 lbs of each other's curb weight going headone on 50% offset at 40mph. which is more realistic because most car crashes don't drive into a building or some metal boxes but to other cars on the road, and they can survive a car within the same class then they have at least some degrees of extra for a heavier vehicle.
So, with all of those different EV's crashed in all those different ways, not a single battery fire. It lets you know that EV battery fires are way over-exaggerated. It's simply not a concern.
Good luck in that crash - especially when the battery starts to burn in some cases due to impact. Sometimes they start burning a couple seconds after impact.
No cyber truck. Clickbait thumb nail. Shame!
No youtube do mesmo jeito se vc pesquisar o crash test do cyber truck ira aparecer 👍
Cyber Truck is the back marker. The result is horrifying.
@@JahongHur not really. Tesla is known for making safe cars. There have already been crashes in the CT and every time the driver/passengers just walked away
@@thedumbconspirator4956nvm i didnt read your full comment
@@2005VolksWagenbeetleAnd Why?
23:14 for those looking for Tesla
Delicious
@@BigWheel.What delicious?
Tezla shit cars..
@@Dj-vrYT but no cybercrap
Do you like these crash tests? Note that the previous frontal crash tests were performed at 64 km/h. In these recordings the speed of the cars being tested is 50 km/h. That's a huge difference!
True, after that speed no manufacturer guarantees any survival, most accidents are well above 50 km/h.
ich hab versucht die musik ab minute 19:00 zu finden...ist bei "music used" leider nicht dabei... weiß jemand wo ich die info her bekomme? 🧐
Are the batteries fully charged?
The good thing is, every one of these cars did really well and are great buys as far as safety is concerned.
Tesla Rules! We have 2 Y’s never going back to ice.
No Cybertruck!! Clickbait thumb nail!! Shame!!
Stolen womp womp
Bro your pfp is a paw wtf
Good work
the rear-end collision should be included for the test.
@@simontong2954 They don’t include rear-end collisions for obvious reasons
@@aaronlandry3934 which obvious reasons?
@@2005VolksWagenbeetle What do EVs keep in the back that tends to become compromised in a crash? 💥
@@aaronlandry3934 what, the fuel tank? Cause the batteries ain't in the back
@@aaronlandry3934most evs have batteries in the center and they also have a crash absorber protecting them, as well as a safety system that automatically isolates the battery (basically just cutting the power to the battery)
I was waiting for battery explosion!!! 😂
Do the world a favor and get a brain before your next post. All this EV bashing is pretty lame and - frankly - pretty idiotic.
Battery fires in EVs are actually quite rare. Gas cars are much more likely to burn!
The batteries of electric cars no longer explode and no longer burn, current electric cars are really safe and very secure, more secure than current gasoline cars
The batteries can catch fire, but you’d have to abuse it or damage it a ton in order for that to happen. Nonetheless, I believe they are safer than ICE cars because of the weight of the vehicle preventing it from flying through the air like a ball and the fact they’re less likely to catch fire.
@@CellPhonzRockEnterprises Yes you are totally right, I expressed myself badly at first, car batteries can catch fire, but new cars are really very safe because it almost never happens.
Critics of the electric car say that electric cars are exploding, the first electric car marketed had this problem, the first generation of Tesla model S could catch fire after an accident, but it was more than 10 years ago, today research and technology has evolved so much that the risk of fire is extremely rare!
I really like the Ioniq 6, but the test results don't seem to match up with the potential damage we see in the cabin. 97% seems relatively high considering some of these other cars have airbags that deploy all around the cabin to prevent heads going through the window even for passengers.
I appreciate how thorough this testing is
What’s super crazy is, that Fiat 500 did way better than the average full-size large American car did in the 1960’s and 70’s!
It did far better than almost every car from the pre-airbag 90's.
@@petersargeant1555 True indeed.
I'm surprised how safe chinese cars are these days. But I was waiting for that cybertruck to appear 😢
For cybertruck test, they need to install airbags to protect those walls and rams.
Ffgh hhcucsgxgch❤❤❤❤❤
they are safe, but only in chinese euro ncap tests
@@siniyden They are safe everywhere and are the safest cars in the world.
Byd has held up well so props to them
0:17 it's Fiat not FLAT
They mean: Flat after the crashtest ...
@automated6225 nope, they called a Fiat a "flat"
Flat is from Chinese version of fiat look at google lmao😂
@NglEditz enough of the nonsense, okay
I didn't know Tesla had any median airbags like between seats, and on the frame close to the ceilling... cocoon like. Wow! Must be alien tech. Tesla excells with the highest safety score. 🤯
The BYD has it too
@@jamesengland7461 also Toyota
It is obligatory to succeed these tests now, since 2022...
@@EJFJ-Corporation I see. Tx.
Chinese cars have had them for a long time, tesla is so behind.
2:57 "Me, driving enthusiastically through the crash test: 'It's not going to be anything!' The MG4 EV: 'I think it was more than nothing..."
I envy that person who pushes the button to send the cars meet that obstacle 😂
Considering the small size of the 500, it performs extremely well.
what is the car at the top right of the thumbnail? looks like a Tesla but i don't think it is
for anyone wondering, the year of release of the cars crashed by NCAP are the two firs numbers in the code under the NCAP logo.
old films, not 2024.
The BYDs were new footage no? 🤷♂️
Some must be 500e is new this year
Pfff ça met le cyber en vignette et rien dans la vidéo sur celui-ci .
Clickbait 😡🤦🏻♂️
What do you mean worst? None of the EVs you show revealed bad results.
Compared to one another worst vs best 👍
They all did well. But it's time for EuroNCAP to include small overlap tests like IIHS.
I will say one thing Teslas cameras can detect when a car is coming straight at you and deploy the airbags
Love it when i smash fly on my camera and airbags deploy
That's true and teslas do pull you into the seat and tries to dodge the crash however in these test all of the sensers are blocked with cameras
Airbags can only be effective if deployed at the right time, premature deployment would make them useless.
@@Trinavara The right time is a fraction of a second BEFORE impact. Tesla can achieve this where others without cameras cannot.
Do good test results encourage less careful driving ?
BYD atto3 are regareded as mid-low end car in China, please test Byd HAN，Xiaomi SU7 or ET7, they are actual competitors o Tesla for the same price range
I like this series 🔥🔥🔥
BYD for the win, tbh! and the center consol airbag between the driver and passenger is something that all cars should have, in my opinion!
Most do but it only deploys if there is someone in the passenger seat. You can see that not all tests had a front passenger.
Many of these actually surprised me.
It seems not having an engine in front is not a detriment.
It is a big plus. Would you rather head butt an empty coke can or one full of rocks?
@@camshaftcasting1451empty coke can
Notice with the pole test, there is only the driver in the front EXCEPT when the car has centre airbags. They probably don't want to show 2 heads banging against each other (or it causes too much damage to their equipment) ?
It’s because EV coverage is heavily biased by EV manufacturers. EVERYTHING is done with the intention of selling more cars
Look at real life crashes involving the car you're talking about
1:36 who would drive porsche taycan at 64 kmph ? and 2:01 50 kmph ?
Chinese cars improvement over the past few years are amazing.
Still wouldnt buy one.
Bought a byd seagull months ago! A great car for driving around the city, especially because there are several completely free charging stations here in Brazil! The only use for our SUV here at home is for traveling!
50kph hit into the wall is not modern test
@@siniyden Do you have any idea how Euro NCAP perform Their crash tests?
5:30 BYD ATTO 3
How is it that the EV @ 10:23 has an exhaust pipe?
I feel so sorry for crash test dummies when I watch these sequences
❤
Guod jób
How did you misspell Fiat?
Never notice the particles and gases that come out from the airbag deployment. Interesting. And I haven’t even heard of some of these cars.
I'm really impressed how fast those airbags deploy. Deployed in 2 camera frames on average. Then they deflate pretty quick. You don't want to get burnt from a burning hot airbag against you. I was impressed those expensive Porsche cars were tested. Good of Porsche to donate those cars. It's worth the loss to get a good safety rating. For all these brands/models tested. An above average safety rating will sell more cars.
Yeah I was baited with the thumbnail pic of the Cybertruck.
Closing comment. These tests are all about passenger protection and were done with, (I would describe it), a dry car. So there was no chance of batteries getting damaged resulting in an electrical fire. That kind of testing is someone else's job.
Are the batteries in the car when they do this?
Back seats need side airbags too especially for vulnerable children to protect the side of the bodies.
1 diislike because of the cybertruck in the thumbnail
04:28 isn't a Ioniq 5. Looks Like a polestar to me. Baaad mistake!
Well hate to break it to you…it’s actually the interior of the Ioniq 5
I agree this is the actual car interior. That white mark on the steering wheel that LOOKS similar to polestar logo is I think a mark put on by the techs for the test
Czy to prawda że te testy są bez baterii robione i zastępują je takim samym ciężarem?
Cars with back seats should have airbags to deploy from the back of the front seats for the rear passengers.
There's really no big need of that since there's nothing substantial in front of them to hit.
When I was first watching The video I thought they was gonna explode the car😂 15:10 this was my time when I messaged This
FLAT 500e?
"Small overlap front: Good"
23:35 : see the back of the child head hitting the car's interior falling off after the impact.
Doubt.
😂
4:10 you may write "good" , but it's worst crash in this video, car is literally falling apart when crashed
volkswagen id4 is not much better, but is also "good"....
Lol
I love cybertruck
Idk about y'all, but the Hyundai ionic 5 & 6 have HORRIBLE A pillars. None of the other cars had a single pillar crumble, but on the Hyundai cars, they start to fold, this is as bad as a 80's car!
Chinese not bad, and Tesla very good!
the speed limit on frontal vehicle-to-vehicle crash test should be regulated to 68.3 km/h instead of 50.0 km/h . . . based on real world crash data . . .
Didnt include the volvo Evs in the crash test. Must be scared lol
No explosion! No Cybertruck! 😂
I guess that 50% offset must be a Chiense standard on its own then. I thought it was copied from the west where they have two car weight within 90 lbs of each other's curb weight going headone on 50% offset at 40mph. which is more realistic because most car crashes don't drive into a building or some metal boxes but to other cars on the road, and they can survive a car within the same class then they have at least some degrees of extra for a heavier vehicle.
So, with all of those different EV's crashed in all those different ways, not a single battery fire. It lets you know that EV battery fires are way over-exaggerated. It's simply not a concern.
I ride a motorbike so don't care about safety, but nice my Tesla is safest for my family 😅
Good thing about fuel powered cars they stop trying to move after a crash unlike electric 2:01
Do these cars have fully charged batteries and did any catch fire within a month?
You made mistake in this video for the Renault e scenic, sometimes you show the e megane and not the e scenic
rear passenger seatbelt pre-tensioners only evident on Mustang-E
yeah. i drive model s
they forgot to include the batteries in the car. all the ones i’ve seen crash in person ended up catching on fire 10 seconds after impact
Hmm buster maybe you've heard of something called an agenda?
Mg4 very strong than ionic5 much more
後発のテスラが伝統を抑えてワンツーフィニュシュすげー
I’m not convinced with the results of some of the cars as shown eg. Toyota BRZ4x
The floor has no grip like on a real road . The tests are mostly designed to give a predetermined result
Clickbait-no Cybertruck!
They could not test the Cybertruck because it destroyed their equipment.
The rolling chassis didn't know what hit it with the benz eq series 🤡
Ionic ❤
the rating of different tests for different cars is not representative
What is the speed ?
Waiting for the cybertruck turn and i am out of luck.
Encap was revised in 2023. Since then, there has been no Tesla. To celebrate American products, you took results from 2022. Good try!
Nhiều xe chất lượng còn không bằng vinfast vf8 tại sao lại đánh giá nhiều sao hơn thật lố bịch 😅😅😅
vinfast is garbage lol.
Sunroof is dangerous when it happens crash😮😮
Evidence would dispute that - a lot of these 5 star rated cars have full sunroofs which cause no issues in the crash tests.
And none of them caught on fire
4:11 good???
Where's the 🤬🤬🤬Cybertruck? Clickbait!!! These EV's all passed with flying colours, no worse here?
NO CYBERTRUCK IN THE VIDEO???😢😢😢
tesla 98% safety assist? damn im in the 2%
cliff notes:#1 tesla model S. #2 tesla model Y. the end.
Where are the Volvo tests??
CLICKBAIT❗Cyber truck in title pic but NOT in the test❗& some cars didn’t do all tests ie: Ioniq 5, no side pole impact❗
Good luck in that crash - especially when the battery starts to burn in some cases due to impact. Sometimes they start burning a couple seconds after impact.
Vinfast❤❤❤
I like Polestar.
1,7,19 - 🏆.
2- не показали последний тест!? Почему?
I have 3 EV's and 2 of them were not in this video. I thought they would be but never mind.
which ones do you have?
The cars: 😕 the music: 😍😌
Wot? No exploding lithium Ion batteries?? 😢😮
No Volvo 🤬😡😡😡😡😡😡😡
No tata indian brand oll car 5 star rested 😢
Volvo💪
Dishonest with the Cybertruck
No Cybertruck. Clickbait
I was waiting for battery