Please consider making a donation to protect the independence of this algorithmic unfriendly channel: paypal.me/tec4mindcom?country.x=GB&locale.x=en_GB Like. Share. Subscribe.
@@matangihealingbyjaya886 thanks for that observation! I'm trying to find time to appeal, but I've been advised it's the content that has demonetised me for now. I had the same problem with the previous channel. Right now, I'm more interested in getting new content out in a responsible way - so I'll chase them up later....
@ pls also diversify your platforms , we all know this type of content is no longer welcomed in the western world we know why. And these platforms and algorithms are more designed to push red pill bro podcasts .. a paid subscription on substack can help
I just came across this cannel because of Princella The Queenmaker, I'm glad to find out you've also started putting the message out there. Keep doing the divine work spreading the truth
I hope this reaches the people that really need it. There are too many channels dedicated to attacking either side rather than understanding. Thank you for this.
15:25 men's religions always define superiority as "escape from the life cycles on earth." You must "win the game" of religion by abandoning your connection to Life, pleasure, connection and purpose here and now.
Yes, it's interesting that Nietzsche who was screaming about a metaphysics that returned humans to the earth in his "Zarathustra" ended up in a nihilistic breakdown and couldn't formulate that "return to earth". A psychological problem....
@@TheEmptyChairMind It's interesting to me, in a sad way, that the idealized "heaven" state of religious fantasy is a sort of suspended conscious bliss, that could not be sustainable without constant nourishment. But of course, the source of that nourishment is presumed upon and hidden, like all aspects of the Feminine. Not to mention the fact that eternal consciousness would inevitably lead to insanity... Cosmic insanity. And that is why I think the "father god" is insane.
@@Egg_Apron Jung directly addresses the "cosmic lunacy" of the Old Testament god in his paper "Answer to Job". Have you read it? My problem with Jung is that he did not hold his gaze on that lunacy for long enough, but he was intuitively immersed in the anima....
@@TheEmptyChairMindno, I didn't read it. I arrived at this assessment after spending 40 years in service to the male deity, and processing his attributes within my own experience. Much of the wisdom of Jung is collective wisdom, I see. I have tended to be suspicious of Jung because of his unexamined prejudice as well. You're doing the Goddess' work, as I have mentioned. ❤
The constant rolling back of ab0rtion access and divorce access, show how unconsciously devoted m3n are to the concept that women owe constant sustenance to the world they have created.
thanks for listening. It feels very incomplete. It's linked to the next video on Freud's two drives, and then a follow up video to combine both models into a psychological statement about misogyny. I'm just not used to putting material together for a public audience so it's taking me a lot longer. But I'm relieved that it appears to be accessible.
It depends on which "issues" you have in mind that need to be conquered? And that really needs a therapeutic space with someone you feel has the skill set and can track your unconscious contents? This means that it is hard to get that kind of psychological processing through books - but it is possible. Probably the best introduction would by Jung's "Two Essays on Analytical Psychology" mentioned in the previous video on Jung and the Shadow Psychology. After that you have two options. For a more positive take on the feminine, there is the Jungian Jean Shinoda Bolen who explores a number of images of the feminine archetype. You may also find Esther Harding, an early Jungian, interesting. However, they do not elaborate on the feminine shadow. For the second option, you can look up "the bad mother complex" here on RUclips and check out available videos on that. And then if you felt brave enough, Melanie Klein's "Love, Guilt and Reparation" or "Envy and Gratitude" are classics in our psychological relationship with our mother. But Klein may need some background to the Freudian framework (called his "metapsychology") which I will be doing a video on. And it may help to get some introductory literature on Klein first. Hope that helps.
@@FlaiderX thanks for asking. Apart from the Bolen, you could attempt the same books I have just recommended here. But once you engage with the literature, it depends on what comes up in your unconscious contents - for which you need a skilled therapist who can track your unconscious contents. If you can be patient and follow the literature in my videos, you should have plenty of reading to be working on. I sense the Darian Leader book may be of particular help from the first half of the book. In psychoanalysis models of mind, they are not worked out as gender specific models, but were pioneering an understanding of shared mental characteristics that could explain mental health issues. You will see from my upcoming videos where I recommend specific literature that you need to know those models before applying them to masculinity. To my knowledge, this has not yet been done, and certainly not with the focus on shadow that I bring - although there are plenty of Jungian books on men (avoid Robert Bly) and particularly fathers. Please feel free to let me know your responses to anything I recommend or that you come across - and I hope you can be patient while I try to adapt my content for a public audience which is much more difficult than talking to those working in the field.
@@TheEmptyChairMind Thank you for your recommendations. Yes, I will be patient, although the comments under your videos certainly amuse and annoy me at the same time. I understand why, but it's still an interesting springboard for social research. As I have already said, I am a curious person, and in general, the topic of psychoanalysis has become more interesting to me (thanks to you, among other things). No matter how scientific or truthful I find it, I'm still a skeptic by nature. Another point of view or thought has always worried and interested me. I haven't had time to watch some of your recent videos yet. However, I am not English and do not speak English as a native speaker, so I have to use translators. But I'll do it soon. I would like to point out once again that I may not completely agree with you on everything, especially with regard to interdisciplinary statements and statements that are not related to psychoanalysis. But it doesn't distract me from the content, and I'd like to learn more... In general, I understand your position, and I would really like to study material that is not intended for men or women. To get to the bottom of it. I tried to read Eric Neuman, but to be honest, I wasn't satisfied with what he wrote. That's why I left him almost immediately. But based on your recommendations, I will try to find these books, perhaps they are in my native language, and read them. Thanks again for the recommendations. If I'm interested in something or have any questions, I can ask them, right?) I hope you will forgive me my English or, again, slightly incorrect words and expressions that you consider offensive. Once again, I don't want to offend anyone. Thank you and my low bow to you) Yours sincerely, Тау
@@FlaiderX your amusement and annoyance are of great interest to me as a psychotherapist - but this is not the right space to engage with them. I think from a previous comment you said you were Russian? You may find the work of Sabina Spielrein in Russian (she started the Russian Psychoanalytic Association and died in Riga) - she was a patient of Jung and then gave Freud the idea of the death instinct which moved him away from his bio-sexual models into group psychology and its destructiveness. Neumann was writing for a Jungian audience so you need the Jungian basics. There is a collection of Jung edited by Anthony Storr - I'm not sure if it is available in Russian.... Any interdisciplinary work always creates objections from purists or from partial understandings that are required for it to be interdisciplinary. The objective then is to work together and improve the model? You can always use the contact form on the website if you have specific queries. Good luck - and thanks for being here!
Of course just like with people of color. Yte men are so fragile that they had to built a whole systen and push it down everybodys throat for centuries to make the whole world believe theyre superior, while they mostly just stole and plundered to silence their feelings of inferiority. You dont do that if you already KNOW youre better.
that would be my reading - he did not look at the shadow implications of male psychology in that model. However, if you work with that more as a metaphor of the physical and social superiority of men over women, then there could be an inferiority complex in women that corresponds to what he said? But what women did with that inferiority was to reclaim their strength. Men haven't even begun to see our inferiority at all. So how can we find any psychological strength that has confronted our shadow inferiority? Thanks for listening!
As the mother of two men this terrifies me and saddens me😢 can’t help but think that it’s inevitable for it to be this way. The only way out is self awareness and a deep desire to evolve beyond unconscious
Didn't intend to cause alarm - and yes, this is just one step in many towards a formulation of masculinity that is free from the gender stereotyping and bio-psychological wiring that men are condemned to. But I can't fit it all into one video - I hope you have the time and can be patient with the process here and get a better feel of the outcome of this shadow work. Thanks for listening.
One of the main points he presented here is that the very nature of this inferiority renders the male brain incapable of analyzing data about their inferiority. Makes this a bit of a vicious cycle, which is the crux of the problem. In my experience, women stay pretty fluid in their ability to self-reflect. Going into the depths of our psychological and emotional experiences is not tortuous in the way it is for men. Public discussions of the "male loneliness epidemic" are popping up all over the place, mostly driven by men willing to acknowledge the dynamics discussed here. There is still a lot of misogynistic push back on those sites, but at least the conversations have started.
Hi Pravin, this was a very interesting video. I wish more men had the patience to watch your videos, it would surely help them in understanding the inner turmoil. The question, “why are men afraid of women and feel inferior “ is also very interesting and I believe the reason why men have this collective shadow inferiority which is evident in violence,crime, rape, murder & fetishes , is because a woman’s body is a portal for “consciousness” or what is called the “soul” or “atman” in some cultures. There has been a lot of research to understand what happens to us after we die, where we (our soul) comes from, where it goes, but there are no solid answers. The death countdown which begins at birth is our Great Equaliser. Man, woman, rich or poor, we are all faced with our inevitable death. Sure, the rich may have better access to medical care but they are still not immortal, no one is. This fear of death, and the woman’s body being the portal for life, I believe, is the main cause of the collective male shadow inferiority. For all their bunkers, billions, lab experiments, have been unsuccessful in figuring out the soul, the consciousness & the secrets of life & death.
thanks for that great insight. You can see the "transpersonal" position very clearly. The difficulty for men particularly is to get there through the shadow work. Otherwise a dysfunctional ego gets hold of transpersonal energy and that leads to quite disastrous outcomes. I hope this channel will finally get there - but there is a lot of preliminary psychological work to be done on the shadow?
I think it's better to keep scientific rather than esoteric terminology. A woman is not some kind of portal to the atman or the soul. And once again, how should this affect men's fear of women or feelings of inferiority? Both sexes are necessary to create life. It is only in union that the act of creation takes place. And before the threshold of death, both men and women are equal. There has been very little research on death and what happens after it, and there is practically no answer to this question. And it is unlikely that it will ever exist.
@@FlaiderX you wouldnt know because youre not a woman. The average mother has attributes that are closer to Godlike attributes than any man and his attributes every existed, lmao.
@@FlaiderX I forgot to respond to your scientific bias as a form of skepticism. Vol 8 of Jung's Collected Works "The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche" worked from biology and physics to find both evidence and analogies for how the psyche might operate in a close (perhaps identical) relationship between psyche and soma. Jung did a lot of work with Wolfgang Pauli, and prior to that work, Gustav Fechner also attempted to use physics as an analogy for the mind (psychophysics) ie energy is invisible but can be measured in how it manifests materially. So you may find that volume interesting as well - separate to the archetypal work. Jung also discusses synchronicity as an acausal principle of time in that volume. If you look up "paranormal research" there are a lot of studies on life after death - to me they are of marginal interest given my clinical work dealing with the living rather than the dead - but research is available and Jung also had his encounters with the paranormal, although it was in symbolic form ("The Red Book"). I do have the video prepared for the question of science and psyche - but that is for much later, I'm afraid.
@ Understood. Thank you. The message of the previous comment in this thread was rather not that. I really don't know much about psychoanalysis, and therefore I have a skeptical grain in relation to it. But your recommendations are interesting. I will definitely study them as soon as I have time. As for my comment above, it did not apply to psychoanalysis. If Jung really approached the study of certain aspects of the human psyche from a scientific point of view, then this is quite interesting to me.
Hi, do you think the ideal from masculinity is Peta from Hunger Games? I can’t explain it to you, but I’d marry peta in a heartbeat. He’s a sensitive man, passionate, and strong. His male nature is so beautiful and unique. I don’t see men like him often in media. Yet there he is, a strength most men can’t have.
Sorry to disappoint, but I haven't watched Hunger Games - fail!! However, I'm glad you have a strong sense of the partner you would like to be with. In Jung's terms, the masculine archetype (the animus) is more about a purposeful energy that has direction which is not shaped by sexuality, aggression, or fear of death (depression) but sees something else that contributes to life and earth (women). Does Peta get there?
@@TheEmptyChairMind Umm. It's kind of weird. Is there really no clear definition of masculinity according to Jung? Without vague terms like "contributes to life and earth (women)". It's not clear what the woman has to do with it.
@@FlaiderX In pure masculine archetypal form, the woman of course has nothing to do with it, just as in the pure feminine archetypal form, the masculine has nothing to do with it. So Jung then sets up what he calls the "contrasexual archetypes" as a process through which a new third (birth of the child) is possible psychologically. And he is quite optimistic about what that birth can bring - a new future. My problem with Jung is that we can't even get to his original formulation of contrasexual, because we cannot isolate the element of masculine or feminine psychologically. To use the analogy from chemistry, we have to separate the compound structure (which currently is highly volatile and conflicted) and identify the elements before re-integrating them. This means you have to release your mind from the compulsion to depend on (and keep talking about) women for a definition of masculinity. The vagueness of my term in a RUclips reply seems strange for you to mention? Surely you understand that this requires several videos to explain - ie it is not vague but overladen with layers of meaning that have to be responsibly broken down? I have also commented here on Nietzsche (see egg-apron's comments) which hints at that complexity. But we cannot rush to the masculine without working through its shadow. That's what all masculine psychologies are doing. This channel works in the opposite direction because there is something incomplete (and dangerous) when we can't see our shadow.
@@TheEmptyChairMind Thanks for your reply. It's not that the vagueness of your term is strange. I just wanted clarification or more specifics. Again, I'm not negative, it's just that, as I said in other comments, I'm a curious person. That's why I asked this question. Thank you for your detailed reply. It was interesting to read.
OH WOW,*** FROM THE MICROCOSM TO THE MACROCOSM ***. THIS IS MASTERFUL.* UNPRECEDENTED * THE WORLD NEEDS YOUR INSIGHTFUL WORDS AND GROUND BREAKING LEADERSHIP. GO DIVO ANGELA
thank you. Please be patient with me as I am not used to speaking to a public audience and only take part in professional conferences or seminars. So it is hard to plan the content in the videos correctly. But there are more on the way..
@@TheEmptyChairMind I first heard you on the High Powered Podcast with Princella. I was fascinated and educated at the same time! I really appreciated the respect you both gave each other! I have found in my relationship with my husband of 35 years, that solid open, non judgmental communication is extremely important and enlightening!
How did you come to this conclusion? Did you have some discussion on academic level with other psychologists about this theory? Was it challenged in any way? Do you ever consider that you might be wrong and it is just your projection? Have you ever watched "Jung to live by" channel especially on "Terminal lucidity" and "Rebirth" videos? You should contact Steven T Richards from "Jung to live by" and tell him about your theory.
Following your own advice, you might benefit from some research on me before posting? For example, the introductory video to this channel? I'm sorry to disappoint you but I don't need your authority figures to validate my work. I do look forward to collaborating with them on these very important topics which I trust they are all fully engaged with.
@@TheEmptyChairMind I watched all your videos before making my comment but I watched them on premiere so I probably forgot what was in those videos. I am just curious if you discussed your theory with some other psychologists and Jungians. Those aren't my authority figures, they just came to my mind because you are mentioning Jung in your videos and I thought that would be interesting collaboration. You didn't disappoint me but I didn't expect so defensive response on such neutral questions, I am not a native speaker and I didn't mean to offend you. Good luck with your work.
Great explanation yet I can't stop thinking about the misogynistic man's relationship with his mother I see a lot if them idiolising their mothers while degrading other women perhaps this is just how narcissists see women either in a mother role or a wh**e role but misogyny isn't exclusively a narcissistic trait perhaps something went really wrong between them and their mothers that it shaped their views of themselves and the world and they can't see any woman beyond their trauma filter
Both parents are very important in the psychological development of a child. However, I previously commented in an interview on Adam Lanza who shot his mother dead before he conducted the Sandy Hook massacre. Could you reduce that level of aggression to merely his relationship with his mother? Now extend that to the examples I have given in previous videos about misogyny acts in rape and murder, sexual abuse, domestic violence and institutional discrimination. Perhaps that requires a different analytic starting point - which is what I am attempting here?
This is very insightful. I've always known that tip toeing around the male ego is the first rule of sailing. And really everything to do with getting along with men. I was thinking how hard it would be as a woman going for a leadership position in terms of how to approach men or project to them emotionally. Female strength can trigger male insecurity or a feeling of emasculation. So it's like walking a balance beam or threading the needle psychologically. I think Mexico's president Claudia Sheinbaum has the kind of presence that begets leadership and confidence through intelligence and communication without challenging masculinity. (Check out Jasmine Crockett! The men are scared.) Now I know why being confrontational with men does not work for female leadership most of the time. It's all about navigating the male ego and their fragile feelings of inferiority. I can sort of understand on the psychological level of rejection. The need for superiority is seriously stunting humanity's ability to progress past might makes right. Or put another way, to get up the pyramid of the hierarchy of needs past mere survival.
Very true. I was never interested in coddling the male ego, so I never learned how. Although there were good things in my relationships, I eventually left them because I held them to standards of conduct and emotional intelligence that men are just not skilled at. I felt dissatisfied, they felt devalued and defeated. My friends who stayed in their marriages acknowledged that it took a lot of work and lowered expectations, and I was so disappointed in the language they used to describe their husbands' stunted development, like they were trained monkeys or something. I can't help wonder "Is this it for human beings? Aren't we capable of more than this?" I'm learning to think like Previn, seeing this as a historical movement, a sea change in human psychology where men are being forced by the pain of isolation to begin self-reflection. I see positive changes with each new generation, so there's hope.
Yes. I can kind of understand what they're talking about. But there is no need to generalize. Men also have problems with your female ego. Judging from my experience and that of my male colleagues in my country, the female half of humanity is often unpleasant. It's not that simple with a woman's ego. It is often difficult for us to resist him, and we are forced to make concessions (to be "knights", to appease, etc.). In the future, I would like to study the female ego and shadow in order to better understand how to coexist with women. Because here, in the comments, women present themselves as exceptional victims, which they are not.
@@stellai06 Ummm. 1) You can. 2) Men were also exploited by society. The times of the past are a class society. The rich rule the poor. I doubt that a woman from a rich family was exploited by men from the middle or lower classes (which is 90% of the population). I understand it's important to talk about women's issues. Women have been treated unfairly in the past. But I'll tell you what: do you think that society has not exploited men? In tsarist Russia, ALL men were obligated to serve for 20+ years in the army. The mortality rate is incredible. And if you want to say that it was men who exploited men, then no. Russia had many female rulers who also actively participated in wars. Women received bonuses for the fact that men served in the army and defended their country. Societies of the past actively exploited men and women. But each sex was used in its own way. This fact is simply indisputable, and your attempts to pull the blanket over women, in my opinion, look childish.
I found this to be woefully true when my so called feminist brother got irritated with my quiet leadership in the care of our dying father. I did everything for the family. Set everything up so my brothers could visit at leisure with our dad. It was my own husband that had to correct my brother. (I thought, 'dude, you SAY you are all for women leaders, but when one does lead, you get butt hurt'). I still find I have to tip toe around him or he will lose it.
if you feel comfortable/safe, you could share your thoughts here - if not, you can use the contact form on the website? Jung was very immersed in the gnostic literature which I have only peered at from a distance since I'm working from a psychotherapeutic agenda - facilitating change, and possibly healing....
Incredible work! 🤗 Since you mostly focus on heterosexual men, i wonder if you think that gay/bi men are less likely to be prone to some of these vices of shadow psychology that you talk about? Possibly since they also experienced a lot of oppression in the past.
thanks for listening. I didn't want to get into alternative sexual identities because you have to establish the psychological frame first to anticipate all the emotionally reactive backlash from all sides of the debate. But these models of mind are not gender specific - so you would use the same frame, model, language but run it through the sexual variables of LGBTQIA and then clearly differentiate how the shadow is different in each group.
As an American black woman is this my opinion based on my anecdotal experience: I feel like men that are a part of the LBGTIA community also hate women just as much as hetero-men. However, because they are not sexually attracted to us they are not as sexually aggressive towards us. They are just as quick to get violent with women. However, I trust men that are a part of the LBGTIA community to defend me against another man before a heterosexual man will physically and verbally. They slightly (maybe because of increased estrogen) have more empathy for women than hetero. Just my opinion, not based on anything academic. I love that this topic is being explored by men. Men will only listen to men. Thank you for tackling the topic
@@aging80sbaby just want to agree as a woman I've met plenty of misogynistic gays. They're probably more likely to bring the violence on themselves rather than externally.
I would like very much to talk to you about mystical topics, such as "the jewel in the cave" and what I have discovered in the Darkness. Donation sent.
I wonder if yall are taking the cultural and historical roots of the term misogyny into consideration? Especially also the very REAL dynamic, not romantic, between the sexes.
These? ""misogyny (n.) "hatred of women," 1650s, from Modern Latin misogynia, from Greek misogynia, abstract noun from misogynēs "woman-hater," from miso- "hatred" (see miso-) + gynē "woman" (from PIE root *gwen- "woman"). Its opposite is philogyny (1620s)."" ''""*gwen- Proto-Indo-European root meaning "woman." It forms all or part of: androgynous; banshee; gynarchy; gyneco-; gynecology; gynecomastia; gyno-; misogyny; polygyny; quean; queen. It is the hypothetical source of/evidence for its existence is provided by: Sanskrit janis "a woman," gná "wife of a god, a goddess;" Avestan jainish "wife;" Armenian kin "woman;" Greek gynē "a woman, a wife;" Old Church Slavonic zena, Old Prussian genna "woman;" Gaelic bean "woman;" Old English cwen "queen, female ruler of a state, woman, wife;" Gothic qino "a woman, wife, qéns "queen."
Misogyny/Misandry being a response to one's perceived sexual undesirability is pretty straight forward. The ultimate cause though of either is the narcissistic mother. Misogynists likely feel judged by women which goes back to their relationship with their mother. Misandrists hate men because their father was "too weak" to protect them from their narcissistic mother and may have even abandoned the child in an effort to protect themselves. Leaving the child with a narcissists who inevitably will brainwash the child into believing the father was wrong, the mother was right and in turn, completely warping the child's worldview. This is where the objectification of women comes from. Men who objectify women are first objectified by their mother who views them as a doll (see the now infamous lego gender experiment). What's really awful, is when sexually undesirable men feel the need to boost women's egos in an attempt to get any kind of attention of affection from the woman (i.e. the sim/p). These men and the women who take advantage of them are catastrophic to the psychological homeostasis of a society.
Comparing misogyny to misandry is like comparing apples to oranges. Misandrists do not use violence, r@pe, murder, abuse,war, genocide, torture, gang r@pe, financial abuse as a method of expressing their inner shadow inferiority. But then , I do not expect you to even comprehend what he is trying to point out. I doubt you even had the patience to watch 10 minutes of the video. To understand what he is saying is to accept that the male species has killed his fellow man, woman , children and animals for millennia. As Sebastian Kraemer , child & adolescent psychiatrist implied, “Maleness, is a genetic disorder”
@@kaliversuspatriarchywrong , there's a forum of Korean misandrists that encouraged the raping of a 14 yeard old boy in australia by a korean women and after the fact they financed her trail and defended her actions
thanks for these great insights. Developmentally, you are quite right in working through the parental imago figures in the psyche. My worry is that when men talk about the feminine (Mother) it is too easy to distract from the realities of our masculine shadow? So I wanted to isolate the analysis in a way that men don't to see what we can understand about ourselves. And the biological component becomes as important as the primary parental relationships. Thanks so much for listening. Looking forward to more of your thoughts!
@ sure but in 2025 i’m not sure this is so relevant. I think the pressing concern is the monstrous growth in narcissism among women which is perpetuating repression in men which is leading to said shadow. Ie it’s the female shadow that needs to be addressed and its issues nipped in the bud. In Addition being solution oriented, one must face and forgive their mother. Otherwise this knowledge is useless and only serves to feed said narcissism (just see this comment section, the delusion and self importance is unbearable).
@@kaliversuspatriarchysure sure reread your comment tell me that’s not misandry. These are strawmans and false dichotomy type of arguments you make but i doubt you have the intellect to process such a contradiction. in fact when kali holds the head of shiva while standing on his body, this is the precursor of female narcissism and misandry. It’s not ironic that you identify with her.
I agree. I was responding to the criticism of being too general in my argument. Gender and society level issues are hard to talk about without generalizing.
You forget the male brain? We are all one in consciousness. Male brain , we are just different in lifestyle cultures and how we think! It’s not generalization it’s a fact
why do you want me to do a presentation on misandry when I haven't even opened up or explained misogyny, let alone racism and fascism which this channel was set up for? Isn't it the task of men to work together to analyse and attempt to resolve our lunacy, before we make pronouncements about women's psychology? I would welcome any comments that you or other men have about any knowledge gaps or errors in my work. This is a collaborative endeavour and I don't have all the answers. But perhaps one step at a time - with the first step being ourselves as men?
@ did my suggestion trigger you? i’ve already said for balance and relevance but if you want more: if you did the same for misandry, not only would it give you a better understanding of misogyny, so you can deliver your message better, but by showing you’re coming from a balanced and neutral place, you’ll engender more trust and engage men better. You’ll actually get your message across to your desired audience. Unless of course you’re just trying to pander to women. Further, I speak for “black” men who have been called inherently violent, told they need to be re-educated/civilized, and implied to be predators historically here in the west. Feminists have gone to perpetuate the exact same messages with zero regard for this, thinking if they insult white men enough it’ll erase the abuse they have doled out to their own allies. Just read the comments under this video. There are a lot of bullies here and in 2025 it’s to time correct this. This is not 1995, where your message belongs. Any overt misogyny you see today is in response to f*male bullies/abusers. You’re also undermining the work of men who’ve already spread your message ad nauseam.
@@peterGnash thanks for contextualising your comment about misandry. I'm working in a tradition that has been repeatedly rejected by both society and the medical world, so definitely not interested in pandering to women or starting a men's movement. And I wasn't triggered. What I saw was an incapacity to process the violence and destruction of men when isolating and then analysing it psychologically, just as you would in a chemistry lab if you were trying to identify and understand a volatile and dangerous chemical substance. You would want to examine its structure, properties and predictable characteristics before trying to find solutions to fix it. To do that, you isolate it? So the need to speak about misandry seems to be a psychological need in men - something that I hope to look at in the next video. For now, I'll just say that it repeats a dependency on women in order to appear balanced, when psychologically what is happening is a deflection. When a chemist is analysing a volatile chemical substance, you usually don't ask them to be balanced. Hopefully, you are interested in the analysis? Once the analysis is over, the next step would be integration rather than misandry. That integration will hopefully help men not to step into misandric relationships or behaviours, but sustain more positive relationships from a secure psychological base. I'm sorry if you find my content repeated ad nauseam. I'm just analysing - I'm not trying to be original. Thanks for your comments and your time.
Please consider making a donation to protect the independence of this algorithmic unfriendly channel:
paypal.me/tec4mindcom?country.x=GB&locale.x=en_GB
Like. Share. Subscribe.
There are multiple channels with the same name, may be that is also causing suppression of the videos
@@matangihealingbyjaya886 thanks for that observation!
I'm trying to find time to appeal, but I've been advised it's the content that has demonetised me for now. I had the same problem with the previous channel.
Right now, I'm more interested in getting new content out in a responsible way - so I'll chase them up later....
@ pls also diversify your platforms , we all know this type of content is no longer welcomed in the western world we know why. And these platforms and algorithms are more designed to push red pill bro podcasts .. a paid subscription on substack can help
@@matangihealingbyjaya886 thanks - substack is definitely on the list of "to do". I'm also posting these videos on Rumble as a back up.
I just came across this cannel because of Princella The Queenmaker, I'm glad to find out you've also started putting the message out there. Keep doing the divine work spreading the truth
Princella is a one of a kind!
I hope this reaches the people that really need it. There are too many channels dedicated to attacking either side rather than understanding. Thank you for this.
Thank you again and again, Previn
Thank you Previn, you're doing an incredible work ❤
Absolutely fantastic research. Divine work to finally bring the clearer divine masculinity that doesn't work on the shadow side. 💚🤗
15:25 men's religions always define superiority as "escape from the life cycles on earth."
You must "win the game" of religion by abandoning your connection to Life, pleasure, connection and purpose here and now.
Yes, it's interesting that Nietzsche who was screaming about a metaphysics that returned humans to the earth in his "Zarathustra" ended up in a nihilistic breakdown and couldn't formulate that "return to earth". A psychological problem....
@@TheEmptyChairMind
It's interesting to me, in a sad way, that the idealized "heaven" state of religious fantasy is a sort of suspended conscious bliss, that could not be sustainable without constant nourishment.
But of course, the source of that nourishment is presumed upon and hidden, like all aspects of the Feminine.
Not to mention the fact that eternal consciousness would inevitably lead to insanity... Cosmic insanity.
And that is why I think the "father god" is insane.
@@Egg_Apron Jung directly addresses the "cosmic lunacy" of the Old Testament god in his paper "Answer to Job". Have you read it? My problem with Jung is that he did not hold his gaze on that lunacy for long enough, but he was intuitively immersed in the anima....
@@TheEmptyChairMindno, I didn't read it. I arrived at this assessment after spending 40 years in service to the male deity, and processing his attributes within my own experience.
Much of the wisdom of Jung is collective wisdom, I see.
I have tended to be suspicious of Jung because of his unexamined prejudice as well.
You're doing the Goddess' work, as I have mentioned. ❤
The constant rolling back of ab0rtion access and divorce access, show how unconsciously devoted m3n are to the concept that women owe constant sustenance to the world they have created.
Even as a Christian, I hope more young women choose 4B.
This should go viral
thanks for listening. It feels very incomplete. It's linked to the next video on Freud's two drives, and then a follow up video to combine both models into a psychological statement about misogyny. I'm just not used to putting material together for a public audience so it's taking me a lot longer. But I'm relieved that it appears to be accessible.
I appreciate him so much. He lays down the very information that we need
Hello Prevan. Do you have any recommended resources women can look to for conquering their own issues with the unconscious mind? Thank you! 🙏
It depends on which "issues" you have in mind that need to be conquered? And that really needs a therapeutic space with someone you feel has the skill set and can track your unconscious contents?
This means that it is hard to get that kind of psychological processing through books - but it is possible. Probably the best introduction would by Jung's "Two Essays on Analytical Psychology" mentioned in the previous video on Jung and the Shadow Psychology.
After that you have two options. For a more positive take on the feminine, there is the Jungian Jean Shinoda Bolen who explores a number of images of the feminine archetype. You may also find Esther Harding, an early Jungian, interesting. However, they do not elaborate on the feminine shadow. For the second option, you can look up "the bad mother complex" here on RUclips and check out available videos on that. And then if you felt brave enough, Melanie Klein's "Love, Guilt and Reparation" or "Envy and Gratitude" are classics in our psychological relationship with our mother. But Klein may need some background to the Freudian framework (called his "metapsychology") which I will be doing a video on. And it may help to get some introductory literature on Klein first.
Hope that helps.
@@TheEmptyChairMind Advise me, a man, what I can read on this topic. What do you think would be sufficient reading?
@@FlaiderX thanks for asking. Apart from the Bolen, you could attempt the same books I have just recommended here. But once you engage with the literature, it depends on what comes up in your unconscious contents - for which you need a skilled therapist who can track your unconscious contents. If you can be patient and follow the literature in my videos, you should have plenty of reading to be working on. I sense the Darian Leader book may be of particular help from the first half of the book.
In psychoanalysis models of mind, they are not worked out as gender specific models, but were pioneering an understanding of shared mental characteristics that could explain mental health issues. You will see from my upcoming videos where I recommend specific literature that you need to know those models before applying them to masculinity. To my knowledge, this has not yet been done, and certainly not with the focus on shadow that I bring - although there are plenty of Jungian books on men (avoid Robert Bly) and particularly fathers.
Please feel free to let me know your responses to anything I recommend or that you come across - and I hope you can be patient while I try to adapt my content for a public audience which is much more difficult than talking to those working in the field.
@@TheEmptyChairMind Thank you for your recommendations. Yes, I will be patient, although the comments under your videos certainly amuse and annoy me at the same time. I understand why, but it's still an interesting springboard for social research.
As I have already said, I am a curious person, and in general, the topic of psychoanalysis has become more interesting to me (thanks to you, among other things). No matter how scientific or truthful I find it, I'm still a skeptic by nature. Another point of view or thought has always worried and interested me. I haven't had time to watch some of your recent videos yet. However, I am not English and do not speak English as a native speaker, so I have to use translators. But I'll do it soon.
I would like to point out once again that I may not completely agree with you on everything, especially with regard to interdisciplinary statements and statements that are not related to psychoanalysis. But it doesn't distract me from the content, and I'd like to learn more...
In general, I understand your position, and I would really like to study material that is not intended for men or women. To get to the bottom of it. I tried to read Eric Neuman, but to be honest, I wasn't satisfied with what he wrote. That's why I left him almost immediately. But based on your recommendations, I will try to find these books, perhaps they are in my native language, and read them. Thanks again for the recommendations.
If I'm interested in something or have any questions, I can ask them, right?) I hope you will forgive me my English or, again, slightly incorrect words and expressions that you consider offensive. Once again, I don't want to offend anyone. Thank you and my low bow to you)
Yours sincerely, Тау
@@FlaiderX your amusement and annoyance are of great interest to me as a psychotherapist - but this is not the right space to engage with them. I think from a previous comment you said you were Russian? You may find the work of Sabina Spielrein in Russian (she started the Russian Psychoanalytic Association and died in Riga) - she was a patient of Jung and then gave Freud the idea of the death instinct which moved him away from his bio-sexual models into group psychology and its destructiveness. Neumann was writing for a Jungian audience so you need the Jungian basics. There is a collection of Jung edited by Anthony Storr - I'm not sure if it is available in Russian....
Any interdisciplinary work always creates objections from purists or from partial understandings that are required for it to be interdisciplinary. The objective then is to work together and improve the model?
You can always use the contact form on the website if you have specific queries. Good luck - and thanks for being here!
This content is amazing. Thank you.
I do wonder if us women also suffer from a different kind of subconscious suppression being told all of the time that we are inferior.
100%
women suffer from envy
Of course just like with people of color. Yte men are so fragile that they had to built a whole systen and push it down everybodys throat for centuries to make the whole world believe theyre superior, while they mostly just stole and plundered to silence their feelings of inferiority. You dont do that if you already KNOW youre better.
@@peterGnashenvy from men, yes.
There is no man superior to me. I’m not superior to any man or women.
So would Freuds “penis envy “be a projection of mail inferiority complex?
that would be my reading - he did not look at the shadow implications of male psychology in that model. However, if you work with that more as a metaphor of the physical and social superiority of men over women, then there could be an inferiority complex in women that corresponds to what he said? But what women did with that inferiority was to reclaim their strength.
Men haven't even begun to see our inferiority at all. So how can we find any psychological strength that has confronted our shadow inferiority?
Thanks for listening!
As the mother of two men this terrifies me and saddens me😢 can’t help but think that it’s inevitable for it to be this way. The only way out is self awareness and a deep desire to evolve beyond unconscious
Didn't intend to cause alarm - and yes, this is just one step in many towards a formulation of masculinity that is free from the gender stereotyping and bio-psychological wiring that men are condemned to. But I can't fit it all into one video - I hope you have the time and can be patient with the process here and get a better feel of the outcome of this shadow work. Thanks for listening.
Every ten minutes a woman's life is ended by a man, and every ten minutes a man ends his own life. 😢
First ✊🏼😂 love ur videos!!
Love your insights and looking forward to the next video upload
Definition of MAGA
And the bros all stick together
Explains a lot
Not too academic
Mi don’t feel sorry for men
Figure it out
Women had to
One of the main points he presented here is that the very nature of this inferiority renders the male brain incapable of analyzing data about their inferiority. Makes this a bit of a vicious cycle, which is the crux of the problem. In my experience, women stay pretty fluid in their ability to self-reflect. Going into the depths of our psychological and emotional experiences is not tortuous in the way it is for men. Public discussions of the "male loneliness epidemic" are popping up all over the place, mostly driven by men willing to acknowledge the dynamics discussed here. There is still a lot of misogynistic push back on those sites, but at least the conversations have started.
Hi Pravin, this was a very interesting video. I wish more men had the patience to watch your videos, it would surely help them in understanding the inner turmoil.
The question, “why are men afraid of women and feel inferior “ is also very interesting and I believe the reason why men have this collective shadow inferiority which is evident in violence,crime, rape, murder & fetishes , is because a woman’s body is a portal for “consciousness” or what is called the “soul” or “atman” in some cultures.
There has been a lot of research to understand what happens to us after we die, where we (our soul) comes from, where it goes, but there are no solid answers.
The death countdown which begins at birth is our Great Equaliser. Man, woman, rich or poor, we are all faced with our inevitable death. Sure, the rich may have better access to medical care but they are still not immortal, no one is.
This fear of death, and the woman’s body being the portal for life, I believe, is the main cause of the collective male shadow inferiority.
For all their bunkers, billions, lab experiments, have been unsuccessful in figuring out the soul, the consciousness & the secrets of life & death.
thanks for that great insight. You can see the "transpersonal" position very clearly. The difficulty for men particularly is to get there through the shadow work. Otherwise a dysfunctional ego gets hold of transpersonal energy and that leads to quite disastrous outcomes. I hope this channel will finally get there - but there is a lot of preliminary psychological work to be done on the shadow?
I think it's better to keep scientific rather than esoteric terminology. A woman is not some kind of portal to the atman or the soul. And once again, how should this affect men's fear of women or feelings of inferiority? Both sexes are necessary to create life. It is only in union that the act of creation takes place. And before the threshold of death, both men and women are equal.
There has been very little research on death and what happens after it, and there is practically no answer to this question. And it is unlikely that it will ever exist.
@@FlaiderX you wouldnt know because youre not a woman. The average mother has attributes that are closer to Godlike attributes than any man and his attributes every existed, lmao.
@@FlaiderX I forgot to respond to your scientific bias as a form of skepticism. Vol 8 of Jung's Collected Works "The Structure and Dynamics of the Psyche" worked from biology and physics to find both evidence and analogies for how the psyche might operate in a close (perhaps identical) relationship between psyche and soma. Jung did a lot of work with Wolfgang Pauli, and prior to that work, Gustav Fechner also attempted to use physics as an analogy for the mind (psychophysics) ie energy is invisible but can be measured in how it manifests materially. So you may find that volume interesting as well - separate to the archetypal work. Jung also discusses synchronicity as an acausal principle of time in that volume.
If you look up "paranormal research" there are a lot of studies on life after death - to me they are of marginal interest given my clinical work dealing with the living rather than the dead - but research is available and Jung also had his encounters with the paranormal, although it was in symbolic form ("The Red Book").
I do have the video prepared for the question of science and psyche - but that is for much later, I'm afraid.
@ Understood. Thank you. The message of the previous comment in this thread was rather not that.
I really don't know much about psychoanalysis, and therefore I have a skeptical grain in relation to it. But your recommendations are interesting. I will definitely study them as soon as I have time. As for my comment above, it did not apply to psychoanalysis.
If Jung really approached the study of certain aspects of the human psyche from a scientific point of view, then this is quite interesting to me.
I loved your video. Was not boring at all. Thank you.
This explains why they have oppressed my people
Hi, do you think the ideal from masculinity is Peta from Hunger Games? I can’t explain it to you, but I’d marry peta in a heartbeat. He’s a sensitive man, passionate, and strong. His male nature is so beautiful and unique. I don’t see men like him often in media. Yet there he is, a strength most men can’t have.
Stop thinking about marriage and men
Sorry to disappoint, but I haven't watched Hunger Games - fail!! However, I'm glad you have a strong sense of the partner you would like to be with. In Jung's terms, the masculine archetype (the animus) is more about a purposeful energy that has direction which is not shaped by sexuality, aggression, or fear of death (depression) but sees something else that contributes to life and earth (women). Does Peta get there?
@@TheEmptyChairMind Umm. It's kind of weird. Is there really no clear definition of masculinity according to Jung? Without vague terms like "contributes to life and earth (women)". It's not clear what the woman has to do with it.
@@FlaiderX In pure masculine archetypal form, the woman of course has nothing to do with it, just as in the pure feminine archetypal form, the masculine has nothing to do with it. So Jung then sets up what he calls the "contrasexual archetypes" as a process through which a new third (birth of the child) is possible psychologically. And he is quite optimistic about what that birth can bring - a new future.
My problem with Jung is that we can't even get to his original formulation of contrasexual, because we cannot isolate the element of masculine or feminine psychologically. To use the analogy from chemistry, we have to separate the compound structure (which currently is highly volatile and conflicted) and identify the elements before re-integrating them. This means you have to release your mind from the compulsion to depend on (and keep talking about) women for a definition of masculinity.
The vagueness of my term in a RUclips reply seems strange for you to mention? Surely you understand that this requires several videos to explain - ie it is not vague but overladen with layers of meaning that have to be responsibly broken down? I have also commented here on Nietzsche (see egg-apron's comments) which hints at that complexity. But we cannot rush to the masculine without working through its shadow. That's what all masculine psychologies are doing. This channel works in the opposite direction because there is something incomplete (and dangerous) when we can't see our shadow.
@@TheEmptyChairMind Thanks for your reply.
It's not that the vagueness of your term is strange. I just wanted clarification or more specifics. Again, I'm not negative, it's just that, as I said in other comments, I'm a curious person. That's why I asked this question. Thank you for your detailed reply. It was interesting to read.
OH WOW,*** FROM THE MICROCOSM TO THE MACROCOSM ***. THIS IS MASTERFUL.* UNPRECEDENTED *
THE WORLD NEEDS YOUR INSIGHTFUL WORDS AND GROUND BREAKING LEADERSHIP.
GO DIVO
ANGELA
I enjoy your work. Thank you
please upload more very appreciated
thank you. Please be patient with me as I am not used to speaking to a public audience and only take part in professional conferences or seminars. So it is hard to plan the content in the videos correctly. But there are more on the way..
@@TheEmptyChairMind We'll take anything. It doesn't have to be perfect. We just want to hear more from you. You're doing amazing!
@@TheEmptyChairMind I first heard you on the High Powered Podcast with Princella. I was fascinated and educated at the same time! I really appreciated the respect you both gave each other! I have found in my relationship with my husband of 35 years, that solid open, non judgmental communication is extremely important and enlightening!
I appreciate the Spanish subtitles. (No I don't need them but it's nice that you have them)
Such eye opening video 😍
Excellent work P 👏🏽👏🏽
How did you come to this conclusion? Did you have some discussion on academic level with other psychologists about this theory? Was it challenged in any way? Do you ever consider that you might be wrong and it is just your projection? Have you ever watched "Jung to live by" channel especially on "Terminal lucidity" and "Rebirth" videos? You should contact Steven T Richards from "Jung to live by" and tell him about your theory.
Following your own advice, you might benefit from some research on me before posting? For example, the introductory video to this channel?
I'm sorry to disappoint you but I don't need your authority figures to validate my work. I do look forward to collaborating with them on these very important topics which I trust they are all fully engaged with.
@@TheEmptyChairMind I watched all your videos before making my comment but I watched them on premiere so I probably forgot what was in those videos. I am just curious if you discussed your theory with some other psychologists and Jungians. Those aren't my authority figures, they just came to my mind because you are mentioning Jung in your videos and I thought that would be interesting collaboration. You didn't disappoint me but I didn't expect so defensive response on such neutral questions, I am not a native speaker and I didn't mean to offend you. Good luck with your work.
Great explanation yet I can't stop thinking about the misogynistic man's relationship with his mother I see a lot if them idiolising their mothers while degrading other women perhaps this is just how narcissists see women either in a mother role or a wh**e role but misogyny isn't exclusively a narcissistic trait perhaps something went really wrong between them and their mothers that it shaped their views of themselves and the world and they can't see any woman beyond their trauma filter
Both parents are very important in the psychological development of a child. However, I previously commented in an interview on Adam Lanza who shot his mother dead before he conducted the Sandy Hook massacre. Could you reduce that level of aggression to merely his relationship with his mother? Now extend that to the examples I have given in previous videos about misogyny acts in rape and murder, sexual abuse, domestic violence and institutional discrimination. Perhaps that requires a different analytic starting point - which is what I am attempting here?
This is very insightful. I've always known that tip toeing around the male ego is the first rule of sailing. And really everything to do with getting along with men.
I was thinking how hard it would be as a woman going for a leadership position in terms of how to approach men or project to them emotionally. Female strength can trigger male insecurity or a feeling of emasculation. So it's like walking a balance beam or threading the needle psychologically. I think Mexico's president Claudia Sheinbaum has the kind of presence that begets leadership and confidence through intelligence and communication without challenging masculinity. (Check out Jasmine Crockett! The men are scared.) Now I know why being confrontational with men does not work for female leadership most of the time. It's all about navigating the male ego and their fragile feelings of inferiority. I can sort of understand on the psychological level of rejection.
The need for superiority is seriously stunting humanity's ability to progress past might makes right. Or put another way, to get up the pyramid of the hierarchy of needs past mere survival.
Very true. I was never interested in coddling the male ego, so I never learned how. Although there were good things in my relationships, I eventually left them because I held them to standards of conduct and emotional intelligence that men are just not skilled at. I felt dissatisfied, they felt devalued and defeated. My friends who stayed in their marriages acknowledged that it took a lot of work and lowered expectations, and I was so disappointed in the language they used to describe their husbands' stunted development, like they were trained monkeys or something. I can't help wonder "Is this it for human beings? Aren't we capable of more than this?" I'm learning to think like Previn, seeing this as a historical movement, a sea change in human psychology where men are being forced by the pain of isolation to begin self-reflection. I see positive changes with each new generation, so there's hope.
Yes. I can kind of understand what they're talking about. But there is no need to generalize. Men also have problems with your female ego. Judging from my experience and that of my male colleagues in my country, the female half of humanity is often unpleasant. It's not that simple with a woman's ego. It is often difficult for us to resist him, and we are forced to make concessions (to be "knights", to appease, etc.). In the future, I would like to study the female ego and shadow in order to better understand how to coexist with women. Because here, in the comments, women present themselves as exceptional victims, which they are not.
@@FlaiderXHistorically and sociologically there is no denying that women have been exploited by men.
@@stellai06 Ummm. 1) You can.
2) Men were also exploited by society. The times of the past are a class society. The rich rule the poor. I doubt that a woman from a rich family was exploited by men from the middle or lower classes (which is 90% of the population).
I understand it's important to talk about women's issues. Women have been treated unfairly in the past. But I'll tell you what: do you think that society has not exploited men? In tsarist Russia, ALL men were obligated to serve for 20+ years in the army. The mortality rate is incredible. And if you want to say that it was men who exploited men, then no. Russia had many female rulers who also actively participated in wars. Women received bonuses for the fact that men served in the army and defended their country.
Societies of the past actively exploited men and women. But each sex was used in its own way. This fact is simply indisputable, and your attempts to pull the blanket over women, in my opinion, look childish.
I found this to be woefully true when my so called feminist brother got irritated with my quiet leadership in the care of our dying father. I did everything for the family. Set everything up so my brothers could visit at leisure with our dad. It was my own husband that had to correct my brother. (I thought, 'dude, you SAY you are all for women leaders, but when one does lead, you get butt hurt'). I still find I have to tip toe around him or he will lose it.
I would love to discuss with you a rather gnostic take on what is going on with misogyny.
Oooh share your thoughts, please!
@@33-vertebrae Charles King wrote The Gnostics and Their Remains. The section about the Orphic Gnostics speaks of how they loathe women.
if you feel comfortable/safe, you could share your thoughts here - if not, you can use the contact form on the website? Jung was very immersed in the gnostic literature which I have only peered at from a distance since I'm working from a psychotherapeutic agenda - facilitating change, and possibly healing....
Thank you so much, Great job...
Incredible work! 🤗
Since you mostly focus on heterosexual men, i wonder if you think that gay/bi men are less likely to be prone to some of these vices of shadow psychology that you talk about? Possibly since they also experienced a lot of oppression in the past.
thanks for listening. I didn't want to get into alternative sexual identities because you have to establish the psychological frame first to anticipate all the emotionally reactive backlash from all sides of the debate. But these models of mind are not gender specific - so you would use the same frame, model, language but run it through the sexual variables of LGBTQIA and then clearly differentiate how the shadow is different in each group.
As an American black woman is this my opinion based on my anecdotal experience: I feel like men that are a part of the LBGTIA community also hate women just as much as hetero-men. However, because they are not sexually attracted to us they are not as sexually aggressive towards us. They are just as quick to get violent with women. However, I trust men that are a part of the LBGTIA community to defend me against another man before a heterosexual man will physically and verbally. They slightly (maybe because of increased estrogen) have more empathy for women than hetero. Just my opinion, not based on anything academic. I love that this topic is being explored by men. Men will only listen to men. Thank you for tackling the topic
@@aging80sbaby just want to agree as a woman I've met plenty of misogynistic gays. They're probably more likely to bring the violence on themselves rather than externally.
fascinating
thank you!
I would like very much to talk to you about mystical topics, such as "the jewel in the cave" and what I have discovered in the Darkness.
Donation sent.
thank you. Have you written up any of your work or got it published?
I wonder if yall are taking the cultural and historical roots of the term misogyny into consideration?
Especially also the very REAL dynamic, not romantic, between the sexes.
These? ""misogyny (n.)
"hatred of women," 1650s, from Modern Latin misogynia, from Greek misogynia, abstract noun from misogynēs "woman-hater," from miso- "hatred" (see miso-) + gynē "woman" (from PIE root *gwen- "woman"). Its opposite is philogyny (1620s)."" ''""*gwen-
Proto-Indo-European root meaning "woman."
It forms all or part of: androgynous; banshee; gynarchy; gyneco-; gynecology; gynecomastia; gyno-; misogyny; polygyny; quean; queen.
It is the hypothetical source of/evidence for its existence is provided by: Sanskrit janis "a woman," gná "wife of a god, a goddess;" Avestan jainish "wife;" Armenian kin "woman;" Greek gynē "a woman, a wife;" Old Church Slavonic zena, Old Prussian genna "woman;" Gaelic bean "woman;" Old English cwen "queen, female ruler of a state, woman, wife;" Gothic qino "a woman, wife, qéns "queen."
Misogyny/Misandry being a response to one's perceived sexual undesirability is pretty straight forward. The ultimate cause though of either is the narcissistic mother. Misogynists likely feel judged by women which goes back to their relationship with their mother. Misandrists hate men because their father was "too weak" to protect them from their narcissistic mother and may have even abandoned the child in an effort to protect themselves. Leaving the child with a narcissists who inevitably will brainwash the child into believing the father was wrong, the mother was right and in turn, completely warping the child's worldview. This is where the objectification of women comes from. Men who objectify women are first objectified by their mother who views them as a doll (see the now infamous lego gender experiment).
What's really awful, is when sexually undesirable men feel the need to boost women's egos in an attempt to get any kind of attention of affection from the woman (i.e. the sim/p). These men and the women who take advantage of them are catastrophic to the psychological homeostasis of a society.
Comparing misogyny to misandry is like comparing apples to oranges.
Misandrists do not use violence, r@pe, murder, abuse,war, genocide, torture, gang r@pe, financial abuse as a method of expressing their inner shadow inferiority.
But then , I do not expect you to even comprehend what he is trying to point out. I doubt you even had the patience to watch 10 minutes of the video.
To understand what he is saying is to accept that the male species has killed his fellow man, woman , children and animals for millennia. As Sebastian Kraemer , child & adolescent psychiatrist implied, “Maleness, is a genetic disorder”
@@kaliversuspatriarchywrong , there's a forum of Korean misandrists that encouraged the raping of a 14 yeard old boy in australia by a korean women and after the fact they financed her trail and defended her actions
thanks for these great insights. Developmentally, you are quite right in working through the parental imago figures in the psyche. My worry is that when men talk about the feminine (Mother) it is too easy to distract from the realities of our masculine shadow? So I wanted to isolate the analysis in a way that men don't to see what we can understand about ourselves. And the biological component becomes as important as the primary parental relationships.
Thanks so much for listening. Looking forward to more of your thoughts!
@ sure but in 2025 i’m not sure this is so relevant. I think the pressing concern is the monstrous growth in narcissism among women which is perpetuating repression in men which is leading to said shadow. Ie it’s the female shadow that needs to be addressed and its issues nipped in the bud.
In Addition being solution oriented, one must face and forgive their mother. Otherwise this knowledge is useless and only serves to feed said narcissism (just see this comment section, the delusion and self importance is unbearable).
@@kaliversuspatriarchysure sure reread your comment tell me that’s not misandry. These are strawmans and false dichotomy type of arguments you make but i doubt you have the intellect to process such a contradiction. in fact when kali holds the head of shiva while standing on his body, this is the precursor of female narcissism and misandry. It’s not ironic that you identify with her.
能不能来中国
I would be happy to work with the Chinese community remotely - but I think if I came to China I would be arrested at the airport?
@@TheEmptyChairMind lol. Pls don’t get arrested, I wait eagerly for your videos :)
@@kaliversuspatriarchy :)
Generalizing is always a problem when talking about gender .
yes, generalisations are a problematic in any discipline. Does that make it impossible? Given the problem of misogyny, we have to start somewhere?
I agree. I was responding to the criticism of being too general in my argument. Gender and society level issues are hard to talk about without generalizing.
@@adifferentlight5530 ah! - sorry - I misread your statement.
You forget the male brain? We are all one in consciousness. Male brain , we are just different in lifestyle cultures and how we think! It’s not generalization it’s a fact
**id love to see you do a presentation on misandry for balance, if not its relevance today and for your followers.
why do you want me to do a presentation on misandry when I haven't even opened up or explained misogyny, let alone racism and fascism which this channel was set up for? Isn't it the task of men to work together to analyse and attempt to resolve our lunacy, before we make pronouncements about women's psychology?
I would welcome any comments that you or other men have about any knowledge gaps or errors in my work. This is a collaborative endeavour and I don't have all the answers. But perhaps one step at a time - with the first step being ourselves as men?
@ did my suggestion trigger you? i’ve already said for balance and relevance but if you want more: if you did the same for misandry, not only would it give you a better understanding of misogyny, so you can deliver your message better, but by showing you’re coming from a balanced and neutral place, you’ll engender more trust and engage men better. You’ll actually get your message across to your desired audience. Unless of course you’re just trying to pander to women.
Further, I speak for “black” men who have been called inherently violent, told they need to be re-educated/civilized, and implied to be predators historically here in the west. Feminists have gone to perpetuate the exact same messages with zero regard for this, thinking if they insult white men enough it’ll erase the abuse they have doled out to their own allies.
Just read the comments under this video. There are a lot of bullies here and in 2025 it’s to time correct this. This is not 1995, where your message belongs. Any overt misogyny you see today is in response to f*male bullies/abusers. You’re also undermining the work of men who’ve already spread your message ad nauseam.
@@peterGnashwhy are you trying to tell Pravin how to run his channel, tf. Make your own channel, L. 😂
@@peterGnash Misandry is a response to misogyny. Look around can you blame women for disliking men. It’s like asking why does the gazelle hate lions
@@peterGnash thanks for contextualising your comment about misandry. I'm working in a tradition that has been repeatedly rejected by both society and the medical world, so definitely not interested in pandering to women or starting a men's movement. And I wasn't triggered. What I saw was an incapacity to process the violence and destruction of men when isolating and then analysing it psychologically, just as you would in a chemistry lab if you were trying to identify and understand a volatile and dangerous chemical substance. You would want to examine its structure, properties and predictable characteristics before trying to find solutions to fix it. To do that, you isolate it?
So the need to speak about misandry seems to be a psychological need in men - something that I hope to look at in the next video. For now, I'll just say that it repeats a dependency on women in order to appear balanced, when psychologically what is happening is a deflection. When a chemist is analysing a volatile chemical substance, you usually don't ask them to be balanced. Hopefully, you are interested in the analysis?
Once the analysis is over, the next step would be integration rather than misandry. That integration will hopefully help men not to step into misandric relationships or behaviours, but sustain more positive relationships from a secure psychological base.
I'm sorry if you find my content repeated ad nauseam. I'm just analysing - I'm not trying to be original. Thanks for your comments and your time.
Gratitude and Wholeness 🖤🫶🏽🖤