Officers Sued For Warrantless Search
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 ноя 2019
- Patreon: / audittheaudit
Facebook: / audit-the-audit-209178...
Twitter: / audittheaudit
Audit the Audit 2: bit.ly/2CD2b6j
Welcome to Audit The Audit, where we sort out the who and what and the right and wrong of police interactions. Help us grow and educate more citizens and officers on the proper officer interaction conduct by liking this video and/or subscribing.
This video is for educational purposes and is in no way intended to provoke, incite, or shock the viewer. This video was created to educate citizens on constitutionally protected activities and emphasize the importance that legal action plays in constitutional activism.
Bear in mind that the facts presented in my videos are not indicative of my personal opinion, and I do not always agree with the outcome, people, or judgements of any interaction. My videos should not be construed as legal advice, they are merely a presentation of facts as I understand them.
FAIR USE
This video falls under fair use protection as it has been manipulated for educational purposes with the addition of commentary. This video is complementary to illustrate the educational value of the information being delivered through the commentary and has inherently changed the value, audience and intention of the original video.
Original video: bit.ly/2qFDALE
Suzi D’s channel: bit.ly/2CyTni3
Sources:
TRI articles:
bit.ly/32ApEQk
bit.ly/2O6dLMR
bit.ly/2CFBdLf
US v. McConney: bit.ly/2qOtLe7
Duress: bit.ly/2QfRJJU
Exigent circumstances article: bit.ly/2XaUTAf
Emergency circumstances article: bit.ly/2Q9VWPi
Emergency prong: bit.ly/32wZ3Uc
Justice Frankfurter: bit.ly/33Igsus
>>> www.patreon.com/audittheaudit
Audit the Audit ok and , u sub me back Brother, I have a few up myself
Good analysis of duress. The handcuffing of the husband is definitely duress, you should have started the video prior to that - I've seen the original. The family should have accepted the offer of an ambulance if he police would pay, and they would need to make . I disagree with your editing out the video showing the wrists, viewers need to see how "reasonable" their treatment of the husband was. You may have wanted to mention the fact she could have canceled her permission at any time, for example when he went into her bedroom, just to hammer home how unvoluntary it was. Yes I know she really didn't grant permission, but her trying to revoke it might have forced the issue though the courts already seem to have agreed with them.
Community caretaking, including wellness checks, are one of the most most abused areas of law enforcement. My children know not to use them for me. Due to my family history of heart disease, I am already well past the age (39) where we start having myocardial infractions - heart stoppage. A wellness check won't do me any good at that point, I'll have died in minutes if that happens, and my getting in an argument with an officer at my door might cause me bigger problems, especially if I'm short aleep, have no coffee, and don't have my back brace on (pain). I sympathize with the husband in the original video.
Audit the Audit I don’t know exactly how this u tube craps gonna work, but I’ll HIT U UP ON THE PATREON DEAL, just what is it a monthly subscription. We can donate more can’t we?
RUclips just needs to have a disclosure saying the ads that play before a video have nothing to do with the video you are about to see.
That way advertisers would be able to get a bigger range of people to see the comercials.
Its that easy
I just found this channel about a week ago. Now, it's in danger of RUclips's non-sense? Dammit, man.
If by "commercially viable" they mean monetize-able, I hope the fact I've seen many many ads indicates your channel is in the clear.
“There is nothing worse than putting decisions in the hands of people who pay no price for being wrong.”
End qualified immunity!!
Ain't that the plain ass truth, well said!
@J Zim because people keep putting democrats and Republicans in power who clearly count on the fact that they can easily mobilize 6he police against the general populous.
Absolutely!
Right. You should have said the hands of stupid people.
When are cops going to start having to pay out of their pockets for these lawsuits??
Either that or jail time, and possible loss of certification.
We pay the settlements because we are taxed and an account is funded to cover their illegal actions. I seen too many instances of people allowing their Civil Rights to be violated because it is easier than resisting. I'm going for the money/settlement/punishment when it happens to me. No warrant, no probable cause, no entry.
They should all carry their own liability insurance like any contractor or driver of an automobile
banned from any law enforcement employment too
The Rapture will happen before that ever happens.
ANY cop that gets a complaint against them should be heard in court in front of a jury of people they took an oath to protect and serve. NOT just investigated by other BAD cops.
There are nuisance complaints, just like there are bad cops. Having all complaints go to trial would create just as much of a problem as we have now. The core issue is that neither the police nor the public trust the system to render a fair judgment about the actions of the other.
USA jurys are worse than bad cop's 80% of the time. Without reasonable doubt much?
Much as it would be nice to be able to have such a system, it would very obviously be ripe for abuse.
Definitely something needs to change, this, maybe isn't the answer.
No that's dumb shit and would Tie up the courts for years. Major issues are addressed but when they are operating within the scope of there duty or believe they are doing so they have immunity.
Cops like this…. We cheer when they get dropped!
The fact that he felt the need to stand around afterwards and continuously try to justify what happened, says everything you need to know.
For real. Like what happened to the medical emergency? Tick tock..
No emergency at all. They probably had a warrant pending for the son and were just out to find him. Family should do FOIA request about the so calked emergency.
so, the cops rolled up on a home with an "anonymous" tip, detained the homeowner? Then proceeded to search the property? Gastapo.
About sums up the story. I understand doing your job but from what sounded like the tip came from the girls family that may or may not have been abusing her. Reason why I say that is because runaways normally run away due to family abuse and they are fed up with it. Now the medical excuse could have been because of the heavy long term abuse she has suffered or maybe an illness from birth or growing up. But despite how serious the family thinks it is, I do not think it would kill her unless she has asthma or D type 2.
GeStapo. Geheime Staatspolizei. And they served a very important purpose of addressing crimes against the Führer and the Party, unlike these characters in the video who might just be there because of a drunk driving charge.
📽🕵♂️🕵🕵♀️🕵♀️🕵🕵♂️📽
@@gix_d I already corrected him. Maybe you should first read the replies before commenting.
@@statinskill I actually was gonna CHECK to see if anyone addressed that, and was quite pleased to see such a good comment doing so.
It doesn’t matter how nicely you ask someone to violate them, it’s still violating them and they knew their rights.
I just want to violate you a little bit.
As the AtA guy said in the video, the legality of this situation isn't clear. It was a situation where everyone was acting in good faith: the courts will end up deciding it. I would like to know why the one guy was placed in cuffs, though.
@@georgebarker4847 Probably because they didn't like them asserting their rights.
@@RoadRageLive lol you funny
Fuck that low lif
They always ask you where you got your law degree and then end up getting sued to confirm you're right
I got mine from a box of crackerjack. Obviously that means I know the laws much better than the police.
@@gregkasza1925Except, that is where they got their's. So neutral ground, right? None has rights, over the other? "I wasn't punching you, I was pushing you really hard with a closed fist. What's wrong with *you* ."
Imagine if a police officer, or, anyone, wanted to search a residence, so, they place an anonymous call which "allows" them to enter without a warrant.
Could happen.
Oh I guarantee it does happen.
"Could"? Does. If they even bother to make the call and don't just lie about it...
They're not police officers, they're SS soldiers of the American Gestapo
If someone was in a possible 'medical emergency' where was EMS?
Now that is a good question.
Thank you... Finally some one said what I was thinking.. Good comment..
There was no medical emergency, of course. They claimed the girl was in a possible medical emergwncy, but they were looking for the boy, not the girl.
There was so much bullshit there, and audit's grade was WAY off. Full on F-. No way it deserved a C or even a D.
Thank you for pointing this out. I use to volunteer fire/rescue. Always hated it with pigs around.
megan hunter
Good question.
Though EMS will sometimes stage away from the scene until it is secured. But that’s usually when the people involved are known to be pretty shady.
“I don’t know what you did to my officer for him to physically abuse you while your hands were tied behind your back”. What a sociopath.
I feel you, but if it was Jackie Chan in them handcuffs, he'd still be dangerous. Lol
@@breezyr8077 Nope. Youve watched too many movies.
@@rykehuss3435 Imagine not knowing people can fight in handcuffs lol. Btw if i can learn how to get out of them then anyone could.
@@breezyr8077 You cant do fucking shit in cuffs, you watch too many movies like I said. Kungfu isnt magic and Jackie Chan doesnt know how to fight, he is not a pro fighter, never has been. He is an actor.
@@rykehuss3435 so biting, spiting, kicking, head butting, running... etc. isn’t a thing? You most definitely can do a lot in handcuffs. But given that certain portion was cut out from this video we no have context to determine whether the officers actions were justified.
THAT’S ANOTHER GOOD REASON NOT TO ANSWER THE DOOR AND ALWAYS SPEAKING TO OFFICERS THROUGH A LOCKED DOOR
Not even…. They would probably kick your door down…
They're not officers, they're SS soldiers of the American Gestapo.
3:55
"There is no exigent circumstance, you're not entering my house without a warrant. If you do enter my household, I will file a lawsuit."
Warrantless search is an automatic f in my book.
And brutalizing someone while handcuffed is under a F.
@@Starboy-mp2ci Beating up an innocent who doesnt resist is a *Z*
the problem is warrantless searches have been upheld, and thus in some circumstances it can be allowed, probably why he got a C.
There are reasons they should be allowed in without a warrant. If they saw the suspect dragging a screaming woman in to the house do you really think they should have to wait for court approval before going in?
Yes an anonymous tip with nothing else backing it up is definitely not justified but to say a warrantlss search is always wrong is ridiculous.
The rating system on this channel is a joke
The C- grade is very generous given the fact they did a warrant-less search based on an anonymous call.
Can't tell if the channel is bootlicking, it's clearly a F. These cops not only broke their oath but trampled basic human rights.
@@Damitsall this channel doesn’t “boot lick” at all lmao
@@razzberry4756 they definitely boot lick here and there... I just watched one where a cop stopped and cuffed an army sgt. then several more cops showed up all cause someone stole a leaf blower and he fit the description .... can you geuss what the description was? " black male with white tee"......ATA said "you gotta see it through the cops eyes" and gave them an A+
What's that deputy? You don't have a 4th amendment warrant signed by a judge? (looks door and speaks through window). Well, please feel free to come back when you do and I would be happy to give you a tour of my castle. Until then, you are hereby notified that you must leave my property. Stay safe out there, officer.
@@razzberry4756 The channel is getting worse and worse with newer videos. The older ones with a F compared to the exact same thing in newer ones but C- because the "current climate" and "understanding it from the cops eyes". Sorry, thought this was supposed to be viewed an audit from the point of law not because the officer was polite and had a smile as he broke the law and trampled rights. They shouldn't get excused because they did the bare minimum that should be expected to begin with.
I got woken up at 4 am years ago by the cops looking for some runaway girl I didn't know. They even lied and said they had the right to search my home because it had to do with a minor. My boyfriend told them no and they had to get past him to get in 😂
For being so concerned about some lady that their son allegedly has control over, they spent enough time standing around after arguing with her. Didn't seem to be an emergency after they got what they wanted
Yeah, "WHAT MEDICAL EMERGENCY?"
Notice how the cop couldn't even say that without stumbling over his words. The cops here were both full of excrement!
How it should go.
Cops "We need to search the house for this guy"
Owner "No. Not without a warrent"
Cops "Okay. Have a good day."
Typically that is how that should go with at least one exception. If the police have it on good authority that there is someone in immediate danger or in need of medical attention, then that would be an exception. In the case they were definitely in the wrong and should have had a warrant.
The woman should've said that. I was screaming at the screen. Instead she said show me the law. That's too general.
plus if he was there & she lied about it, she could get in trouble for lying if they could prove she knowingly lied
Agreed
Or, place an officer just outside the boundaries of that property to make sure no one comes in or out without being seen and send the rest to get a warrant , an ambulance and do things properly.
No warrant no entrance, now leave or you are trespassing!
*THE OFFICERS INVOLVED IN THE ESCALATION OF THIS INNOCUOUS INCIDENT ARE CLEARLY PATHOLOGICAL LIARS WHO ACTED TOTALLY ABOVE THE LAW. EVERY ONE OF THESE CRIMINALS IN UNIFORM SHOULD HAVE THEIR EMPLOYMENT SUMARILY TERMINATED WITHOUT PENSION FOR TREASONOUS ACTS OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM. ABOLISH DOMESTIC POLICE TERRORISM AND INCARCERATE ABUSIVE LAW ENFORCEMENT WHO ROUTINELY AND BLATANTLY VIOLATE THE VERY SAME LAWS THEY ENFORCE UPON THE REST OF US.*
Don't open the door in the first place, ask through the door and if they say no, just walk away and go back to...well whatever you were doing.
And trespassers will be shot
Apparently these jackboots need to learn the law and peoples constitutional rights.
@@YourSavant 100 % facts
Watching this now is amazing. Its outstanding how you weathered the storm and have one of the largest and most informative/wicked channels on youtube. Good on you man!!!
It’s unbelievable to me the censorship that is occurring throughout the entire system. I hope you stay around because your content is top-notch. Thank you for all the work you do.
Law Enforcement is Legal Plunder it all about being in control and keep people none Educated
+Law Enforcement is Legal Plunder
Your channel, as well as mine, is subject to being removed under the new TOS, thus preventing us from posting comments.
Many content creators will suffer as a result, since you must create a channel in order to make comments.
Something as simple as up-voting requires you to login. You cannot login without first creating a channel.
RUclips has already turned to shit. The once viable platform is now rapidly decaying, exposing the soon to be corpse.
:
Do you have an address that I could send my email. I dont want to lose track of ya.
Is their a new youtube?
One by one, the many varied avenues of the information highway will eventually be closed down. They know it's the greatest tool we possess, which allows us to share or pass on data and knowledge, and those who ultimately want to be in control of both our actions and our thoughts, do not like the idea the entire world can be informed of a gross injustice within minutes by the simple pressing of the power button on any information appliance that has internet access.
Officers who bring harm to someone for no reason other than “I told him to stand here and he moved 5 feet” and violate the rights of the citizens should be required to cover restitution and pay out of their salary, rather than the pockets of the taxpayers.
except that their salary come from tax payers anyway.
@@morganpypher yes but it would not be extra money and they would think twice before violating rights
Qualified immunity is the key for nonaccountability for their actions
The best way is to have each police officer to obtain their own insurance and when sued and lose the cost is paid by their insurance after a few payouts by an insurance co their cost to keep said insurance policy will become to expensive and they will never be able to be a police office again.
@@mug5988 10-4
An arrest warrant in NOT A SEARCH WARRANT
This lady was an absolute box. We should all strive to maintain as calm a demeanor as she did, considering what she just Witness. If you have to defend your life then it's time to go, but there are situations such as this one where cooler heads prevailed that's exactly what she did.
The deputy’s should’ve left and returned with a warrant. Just because you wear that badge doesn’t give you right to violate landowners property.
They're trained to coax you into giving them "permission". If they don't just bust in, then they don't have probable cause or reasonable suspicion of immediate risk to health or safety of someone inside, or a warrant.
@@andrewheagwood5950 thats why the cop was trying to save face at the end and thanking the home owners for allowing the officers to search the home.
I’d say especially if you’re wearing a badge. Because you’re in a position of trust.
@@Barzins1 Who trusts police any longer? They have proven that they are just a gang of criminal thugs.
If you watch the video it explains the Deputy was acting on Exigent Circumstance witch is a valid Warantless Search exception. There are 13 of them. If you want me to detail what they are I will gladly tell you. The issue here is simply wether exigent circumstance actually exists. On the one hand if this is a possible medical emergency( the exigent circumstance) like someone else said where is EMS. On the other hand shes awful nervous for someone not hiding anything.
"Just doing their job and following orders" is no excuse for their abuse of power and violation of rights
just following orders, got old real fast.
it's not a reason, its an excuse, YOU are responsible for your action and choices.
saying "just following orders" does not excuse you from CHOOSING to follow unlawful orders.
@@ABRAXAS829 I completely agree which is why I brought it up.
@@chrishalling8518 Yah I figured, just posting in a relevant comment with some clarification before the "leave them alone wah, their not responsible for their action, its someone else's fault" crowd shows up. This stuff angers me because I know cops who actually do their job right but get flack for this shit, it's annoying on both ends.
Just following orders & doing thier job is the same thing the Nazi's said before they were found guilty of killing Jewish people and sentenced to death by a judge
The Nuremberg trials long established the fact that 'I was just following orders' is not a valid excuse. If you know your orders are illegal or immoral it's on the officer to refuse to carry those orders out.
This guy is the best auditor in the business on RUclips it is clean and professional and educational and not trying to portray legal values besides to find the ticket and video at location of the county and state to clarify that it does respectfully revises and give the access of public records too within his realm of RUclips ability to professionaly show a disclaimer of that is not a form of legal advice and to educate General Public in the best most professional way to give any public person a will and a way to look up their rights and any RUclips editors or auditors should appreciate the clean content of this video/ all the videos, and as a business owner for 16 years this guy has helped me understands my rights and I appreciate the professional value of knowledge that is being related for common knowledge and our civil rights and I would love to challenge anybody but to question his input and how he betrays his channel in the professional manner, I do not ever comment on anything this video made me validate him as a professional
The homeowners biggest mistake, was saying even ONE word to the cowards in blue.
"Get the hell off my property and don't come back without a warrant..."
The whole point of the video is that he is supposed to be operating on exigent circumstance. That is a warrantless search exception. It means he does not require a warrant. The question is wether that exigent circumstance actually exist. It very obvious they are not in a hury. So I would suggest it doesnt. The excuse of just doing what they are told is never a good excuse because Police are never under a legal obligation to act unless the see a crime occurring in their presence or if they are serving a warrant.
welll... maybe they stop voting "republikun" now
@@Sweet.Mother.of.Cheesus lmao.. just ignore the facts that the highest percentage of police overstep happens in communities ran by democrats.. 🙄
The only fool is one who doesn't realize they both want to be master, and name of party is only true difference
@@Sweet.Mother.of.Cheesus The police unions own the democrat party dumbass.
@@michaeldose2041 FOP are owned by the Republicans dumb-ass. FOP's do not consider themselves labor unions. Police are overweeningly Republicans.
"He has to do what he has to do."
Funny how that only applies when the cop hurts the citizen.
how often do citizens fear for their life when encountering the police? more often than we think
@@jgclark45 More often than with encountering wild tigers or bears.
No, it applies at all times that why police are held in an upper regard. With power comes great responsibility to the people you serve
My favorite part was when the officer said he didn't see what happened. Had that old man floored him you can bet that cop would have seen EVERYTHING......at least thats what he'd tell the judge.
exactly
double standards for thee
Thank her for her service as a 20 year Army Brat
This channel is excellent and beneficial as it serves humanity by transparently exposing injustices for the purpose of making a better future
I'm pretty sure having the husband in handcuffs untill they let the cops search the house is a reason for her to claim she let them in under duress.
the information in the video is up to date as far as i can tell
Yeah. That was literally like kidnapping someone as leverage.
@@brokentombot I agree. The cops knew what they were doing. Most woman would give into police if they take her husband and make her think he will be arrested. And throw him to the ground for walking. The guy had every right to file a lawsuit.He wasn't doing anything wrong. Just not allowing cops into his home. He didn't need to be thrown to the ground for walking on his own property either. He never should of stepped outside. There was no reason for it. Man I'd be so mad if it was me in this situation.
@@misseselise3864 yes It is up to date. I wrote my comment before watching the entire video and didn't change my comment once I watched the end of video that said they won the lawsuit.
The simple answer is they are using duress simply with the threat of consequences for refusal. She was clear. You have no permission, but I can't stop you. No sane person can call that permission.
There should be a law that prevents an "undisclosed amount" in a settlement when the settlement is made with taxpayers funds or insurance paid for with taxpayer money. ALL taxpayer monies should be 100% transparent and public.
Constitution is LAW of THIS LAND no shit its because of the departmetal liability insurance
@J Merch Not what I'm talking about. When a settlement is reached with public funds or an Insurance company paying that settlement on behalf of the public, should be by LAW, 100% public information, UNABLE TO SEAL THAT INFORMATION. Settlements such as this can not be " SEALED " under the LAW that I'm proposing. In other words, SETTLEMENTS CAN NOT BE SEALED, THEY MUST BE PUBLIC INFORMATION, AND AS SUCH, OPEN TO ALL PUBLIC SCRUTINY AT ALL TIMES.
The sealing of the amount is so the winning party is not harressed by people because they know they won the case. However the amount should be made public and not attached to any case or individual to be transparent while protecting the people who won in court.
My dad got caught with a 4 car garage weed grow operation years before it was legal *_anywhere_* and all charges were dropped because the officer barged in without a warrant.
Attacking a man with handcuffs on behind his back should be a big problem
I love the way they take another 15 minutes of your time after they are done violating you to tell you how they didn't violate you
For real, why didn't they just fuck off at that point? They were not wanted.
This is really common in these videos too... it's so irritating that they can't just apologize or leave gracefully.
"If the law doesn't matter when a cop violates it, the law doesn't matter when you or I violate it either."
If the cop was legally allowed to enter the house, they wouldn't be standing outside for 10 minutes attempting to get consent from the homeowner - they'd already be inside. Show me a warrant OR GET THE FUCK OFF MY PROPERTY IMMEDIATELY!!!
@teslagod2003 "Do as I say. Do not do as I do." Does this ever work?
@Ian Battles
I think they could legally enter, but I agree with you that they should not have wasted time with the home owner. That only escalates the situation and wastes valuable time. They should have said that they were coming in. And if she got in the way, they should have slapped some cuffs on her like her husband. I have actually seen cops do that. The person said that they couldn't come in, and they said yes we can and went in. There was no negotiating involved. And nor should there be. If there was someone who needed medical attention, she would be dead before the cops got to her. If there was suspect in the building, they would be long gone by then. The homeowner was also an idiot. What was her idiot husband trying to prove by attacking a police officer? I'm probably a lot tougher than that guy, and I wouldn't have been stupid enough to try that. The best thing to do is to say that they don't have your permission to enter. And if they do it anyway, they will have to face the legal consequences. And then you step aside and say nothing else. If they believe the law is on their side, they'll enter the home. If not, they'll leave. And if you don't like what they did, you can file a complaint or sue the police department. Although getting a video like they did wasn't such a terrible idea. That helps to make certain that everything is documented. I would also take a video of the condition of the home after they left to show any damage they caused.
@@TerryProthero
Did it not ever occur to you that the story of a girl with a medical emergency was just a lie being used to gain permission for entry? When the cop came in, he wasn't looking for the girl. He was only looking for their son. When he was finished with his search, instead of leaving to continue the search for this girl with the medical emergency, they had to stick around to argue and justify their actions. Their actions contradict the story they're telling.
@teslagod2003
There's really not much worrying on the part of the cops. They very rarely are held personally accountable. Even if a lawsuit is won, it still has no impact on the police. They don't pay the settlement. The taxpayers do. We pay for them to do what they're doing, and then we pay for their mistakes. And they don't even have to admit fault for anything. It sucks.
@@brussell639
Maybe. But I'm not sure I see the point of doing that. If I am following the story correctly, they also said that they were pursuing a suspect. The son or whoever it was. If that's the case, they had a legitimate reason to go into the home anyway. And, again, it makes no sense to ask for permission or to have a lengthy discussion with the home owners. I have seen police going into a place like that. They knocked on the door and said they were were coming in. When the person in the house said they couldn't come in, the police said yes we can, and entered. There was no lengthy discussion involved. And they certainly didn't ask for permission.
Unless Mr. Dantzler had been aggressive or had been showing strong signs of potentially becoming aggressive, he should not have been handcuffed. And, if I'm on a jury, I'm not going to look favorably upon any police officer who uses enough force on a handcuffed person that they suffer an injury.
And why is it so difficult for police to get a search warrant? We have doctors on call. Usually they rotate the responsibility with other doctors. Why aren't judges the same way? A police officer who has reason to believe someone might be in physical danger should be able to get a search warrant in under 15 minutes. If law-enforcement were privatized, subject to competition in a free market, that's what you'd get. Instead, because it's government, we get all the poor performance one would expect from a fearless monopoly.
glad to see this channel still going strong 3 years later
Did you also notice the sound of his voice changed? I don't see any other near recent comments
@@haileymoore4122 not really but i've noticed similar things with people just changing their microphone to a better one.
You wouldn’t open your door to an armed stranger, why open your door to an armed stranger in costume!?😳
At least criminals risk going to jail, these criminals in costume get paid vacation and promotion.
globe255
If you call for their help which I would strongly advise against, or they have a warrant. Aside from that, they are armed strangers in costume trespassing.
@@globe255 Unless he is a sheriff he is NOT chosen by the people. Even sheriff's deputies are not chosen by the people.
@@canucanoe2861 So you are saying the police system isn't chosen by the people?
@@globe255 i didnt choose these idiots to infringe my rights. Idiot. You must be a cop.
@@globe255 We didn't choose who will work in the police and who will not, so it isn't chosen by the people..
"You left me with no choice " this is just disgusting bullying and ruff handling and unjustified warrantless forced entering under dirrus.
C- after handcuffing/detaining the homeowner and then injuring him, on the grounds of a warrantless search from an anonymous call about some nameless female that does not live there? Does he have to be full out swatted and shot dead to get them an F???
This comment deserves more likes
The difference in this particular state is instance. The Audit here on the channel is based on the legality based on situation. The grade is based on the officers information on hand. In essense, they are truly looking for someone having a medical issue, that could lead to loss of life. C- would be what i give them too. The way they handled the situation in entirety was poor, but legal, and passable. However, the man did not need to be in cuffs, neither of them needed to go through all of this.
I blame the call they recieved for shitty information more than i blame the officers reasons for entry and search, but the rest of it cant be overlooked either. This is an accurate rating.
"Warrantless" Warrants, being the counter to unreasonable searches and seizures. Not legal, not passable. And it only evolved from there, as any further action after a preliminary unlawful one cascades. Why wouldn't it match how civilians are charged?
There is NO EXCUSE to do this and not even have a warrant 😡
Is USA, or Hitler Germsny or Stalin Urss? O no, is North Korea... Now i understand! But i think that the video is made in USA....
She gave up her right when she said one of you can come in.
What makes me the most furious is that this tip was based on an “anonymous source”?! So anyone can anonymously call in a tip of crime or potential medical emergency and police can then skirt around the 4th amendment and search a home?! The bare minimum to be able to make a report that will result in peoples civil rights being restricted should be that you identify yourself so that if it is determined that this tip was spurious that the tipster can be held accountable.
Moral of the story: If some cops wake you up at 6am by pounding on your door, Don't open it.
And have toys ready if entry with no warrant is made
That won't work if your name is Breonna Taylor.
That is good advice but wouldn't work down here in Tennessee because police will just kick your door in,DEPUTY BILLY JOE AND OFFICER BOBBY JACK get- off on that kind of violence,
@@PolaOpposite That won't work if you shoot at the police like Breonna Taylor. There I fixed it for you. You're welcome
@@stanparker9556 Her boyfriend shot at an unidentified intruder, which as it turns out were the police executing a meritless warrant. And the fact that her boyfriend was not arrested speaks for itself. So put a rock under the tires of your house, put your teeth in the jar next to your bed, and go to bed, you old geezer.
Sorry, but those police going into someone's home when they don't have consent and they don't have a warrant, that is an F in my book.
An F for 'fucked up'.
Theses videos should be a mandatory watch for all police officers.
Love that argument. "If the tables were switched and your son was possibly in some sort of medical issue...."
"wouldn't you want us to trample on someone else's rights?" is the proper ending to that hypothetical.
Lesson: If the police keep pleading with you to let them do something, they are concerned that they don't have lawful authority to do so against your will, and they're hoping for you to consent.
Do NOT consent to ANYTHING.
Yup, if they got a case, they can go to a judge and get a warrant… If not, they can go get fucked.
100% If the cops had the right to search your home they wouldn't have asked, they would have just done it.
Unfortunately these people didn’t have a good enough understanding of the law themselves, unfortunate.
Earning the hate, one citizen at a time.
You are also allowed to withdraw permission at anytime after giving it and they have to comply.
It was a very good thing that she said "this is against my will" after she said one could come in. This is a textbook example of duress defense. Which this video went on to prove.
This is why the homeowners should have gotten a lower grade. "I do not consent to any search" is the one and only phrase you should ever utter in response to any LEO who is seeking to search your property.
Did you watch the video? He even says stating this is against my will isn't good enough for a duress defense.
@@disgruntledtoons if you had to use exact terminology to legally protest something it would be ridiculous. If someone is mute or incapable of articulating themselves correctly does that mean it’s open season on them? We have to expect our police to know when they are breaking the law even if the person who’s rights they are violating are ignorant of the violation or unable to articulate it. Sometimes I think the people who follow this type of channel are split between those interested in ethics and autistic kids.
@@disgruntledtoons and after that, don’t say even ONE word. People seem really ignorant to that, and I no idea why.
@@SanguineBlackBlood that’s our system! It’s rigged against us.
I love when the cops say “it’s on our video camera too” knowing damn well they wrong 😂
Theyre taught to say that. Everything they say is from a script. They’re too dumb to be able to do anything else
And moments from an accidental deletion or malfunction.
Starting to realize just how dirty some are. We have been lied to several times. They do nothing where we live!
In this area, many times the video becomes 'corrupted' .
MISTY TOLER you’re late!
Excellent channel
I am a little confused. The cop may be more confused.... "We need to make sure he is here alone with or without a female that may or may not be....."
"You do not have my consent to come in here"
And then the officer says: thank you for letting us into your house
He thinks that's that will help him in court
yeah cops think they are high shit,
if he came into my home i would of shot him. i will gladly defend my home and family.
it's the same reason they'll say "stop resisting" whether or not the person being arrested is actually resisting. makes it easier to defend their use of force
I never open the door for anyone that way I don't have to deal with this.
Along with remaining silent, that is by far the most effective means of protecting your rights. Had she remained quiet and never answered the door the responding officers would have had no choice but to try get a warrant. Emphasis on try.
If they want to use exigent circumstances not opening the door means nothing, they will come in and you will be treated as hostile.
@@eshootziscrs2868 actually if they can't see your home , why would they be able to break into a home?
Agreed! My doorbell hasn't worked in years. People call me when they're at my door.
@slayne2 easy big boy , comon man.......some of us come in peace
13:11 "You left me with no choice" these officers had every choice, they just chose not to do the right thing.
If there was a woman in medical distress why would police respond? There's nothing they can do to help her. They can't assess her to see if she needs medical care. They aren't capable of being useful in any way whatsoever.
That the deputies stay as long as they did after the fruitless search concerns me. If they truly believed there was a person in urgent need of medical care, shouldn't they have immediately continued on in their search for her?
If they are there because they received a tip that the son had a person whose health was in jeopardy with him and they were there to help the individual whose health is at risk, are they trained to handle said health risks? and if not why did they not bring EMTs with them if this was such a "credible tip"?
Because you are both correct. IF. There was no good faith.
surly the would have called an ambulance to the address if they were that sure that someone needed medical help would they not..??
The biggest clue that exigent circumstances did NOT exist is the fact the cops asked to enter the home. They were trying to get consent to search because they lacked the right to search. If exigent circumstances did exist they would have just pushed their way in. Whenever a cop ASKS for your permission it's because he NEEDS your permission.
Except the whole "urgent medical condition" thing was a total lie by the officers to justify their attempt to conduct an illegal warrant-less search.
I had a couple cops claim a warrantless search on my parents house when I was in high school. They were looking for a friend of mine. My friend wasn't at my house. The two cops were fired . City had to pay a lot of money to my folks. One cop couldn't find a job after that. He committed suicide. The other has bounced around as a security guard the rest of his life.
I do not believe in defunding the police, but I say yes! to teaching those who abuse there power a good lesson. I feel sorry for the person who took his own life, but also truly hope this sent a clear message.
@@jorgerodriguez-ig5oe In high school my friend had a difficult time with his parents. He had a fight with them and left home. I actually was completely unaware of this when the cops showed up. They forced their way in when I answered the door. Absolutely no sign of my friend or drugs. I suspect the cop who committed suicide may actually felt guilty over what they did.
good job..they should lost more so they will know what they do before they act and react to what they should get.
the one cop should have taken the other one with him . could not have ended better .
@@gph9252 that's a disgusting thing to say. Try to elevate yourself above the root of your anger. You ought to be ashamed of yourself.
So the government overlords decided they would pay a settlement because they didn’t want to go to trial and risk losing in court? Isn’t that called hush money?
I'd tell them they need a warrant because if I showed up at someone's house with the same explanation it wouldn't be good enough for me to enter it's not good enough for you. No warrant no entry.
Until cops like that have to fear armed men forcing their way into their homes, this will never change.
they'll just shoot you from the yard lol, good luck trying to take down an entire police force by yourself bub
@@lilpenguin092 Hell, just get your neighbors to shoot at them. Even in death liberty rings!
@@lilpenguin092 Actually it wouldn't be that hard and I suspect that there are some out there with this plan in mind. The pen is mightier than the sword though and it's sites like this that offer a more appropriate Medium for expressing the necessity of change.
@@rjright7373 "The pen is mightier than the sword" said by those who have never faced a sword
SECOND AMENDMENT? BUT DUMB LIBTARDS WANT TO TAKE IT AWAY IF EVERYONE OWNED A GUN THESE BULLIES WITH BADGES WILL THINK TWICE ABOUTFUCKING AROUND
She should not have allowed them in. All she should have said is: "trespassing, please leave"
They would have come back with a tank and killed both of them
They detained her husband. Notice they released her husband after she let them searched under duress.
She should have said no to the search and the went and sit down and ignore them
They had her husband in cuffs and he was bleeding from mistreatment. I imagine his immediate well being was on her mind more. If it was my spouse in cuffs bleeding from unknown origins I'd have done the similar.
This should have gone a little something like this:
"Hey, I'm Deputy Facey McFace. We got a call about a possible medical emergency with a Ms. Name McNamey, is there anything like that going on?"
"No, nothing like that here."
"Okay, do you mind if I come in and take a look around just to be 100% sure?"
"No, I don't think that would be appropriate"
"Okay, that's fine, can you point us in a better direction? Do you know who she is or if she's been here?"
"I have no clue, Deputy."
"Okay, well there's not much else we can do here, if something does happen, medical or otherwise, could you give us a call to let us know?"
"Sure"
"Alright have a nice day.
Dispatch, McFace. We couldn't get consent to enter the home, we're gonna be 10-8."
Always love to see the police educating their most loyal supporters that their trust in the government has been misplaced
Sounds like someone doesn’t like their daughter dating their son and gave the impending “medical emergency” as a way to claim exigent circumstances to skip a search warrant.
Does her "medical emergency" constitute 'exigent circumstances'? If she's a grown-up travelling with the guy on her own freewill, that should not be grounds for them to just claim to absolutely need to go into whoever's house they fancy.
The fact that no EMS came along or was supposed to reach any time soon proves that the police did not genuinely believe that entry was necessary to prevent physical harm to the lady on the grounds of some alleged medical emergency.
I think it was some a-hole abusers wife, but I bet that's exactly wat happened more or less
@@philippealexis I believe the problem is that she's a minor, so the police have to give her parents' claims some weight.
Exigent circumstances don't give them the right in that circumstance to enter the home. If it had, a second officer would be obtaining an emergency warrant from a judge who'd heard the evidence. It goes like this: By phone: Deputies: Your honor, we need a warrant for these reasons. Judge: Agrees or disagrees. If agrees: I'll have it ready for pickup in 5 minutes. Deputies: Officer so and so will pick it up in 5 minutes. In 5 minutes officer would be en route to the home while the other officer speaks to the homeowners/renters. How the conversation with the judge went: 1. They never called because they knew there was no evidence and it was a flimsly tip, without even a name of the girl. 2. They called because they could, like at the house, because they could, and the judge said NO.
The woman is right. They used bully tactics and not the law to gain entry into their home.
@@AllUpOns If she’s a minor, that is a whole other bag of worms. That’s a whole missing persons report.
All they had to do was get a search warrant. Why is that so hard. Lesson here: don’t talk to the police!!!
Chuck Cribbs They had an arrest warrant for the boy. No judge is going to give them a warrant to search his parents property. They don't give a rip about that woman, that was just an excuse to enter the home and a flimsy one at that. Plain and simple they were after the son. They had no warrant so they colluded and came up with a BS story. They lied, coerced and injured a man in handcuffs. They executed a warrant less search and held a man hostage as leverage. I'm not sure what gets you an F but this gets an F in my book.
When executing a search normally yes you need a Search Warrant. There are however 13 Warantless Search exceptions. Most of these 13 revolve around whether or not one has a reasonable expectation of privacy in a given situation( SCOTUS has defined what is and is not a reasonable expectation of privacy and what is not)The key word in 4th Amendment and most of the 13 exceptions is REASONABLE. I said most because there are a few exceptions where things like exigent circumstance and hot pursuit trump ( according to SCOTUS case law) an otherwise reasonable expectation of privacy. Now the people in this video have that reasonable expectation requiring a warrant under most normal circumstances. The question is do these deputies actually have the exigent circumstance they are claiming? I think had they showed up with EMS or had EMS in rout or at all been answering a real medical emergency the answer would be yes. That however is not whats happening. If it had been a real exigent circumstance they would have yanked up both these people put them in cuffs and gone into the house and then cut them loose when the search was over. What they are doing is trying to talk their way into the house talking about exigent circumstance then they will turn around and call it a consent search. Key difference in a real exigent case police are forcing entry they are not going to sit around discussing it with you this is a ploy nothing more.
they couldn't get a judge to sign on their evidence!
Because no judge would hand out a warrant based on the little information / evidence presented...
Isn’t it enough that she said “Don’t you come in here. You do not have my consent.”? I’m confused as to why that wasn’t enough.
I love this channel everyone should watch and learn
When can we actually hold the officers accountable personally
When they've lost qualified immunity by purposefully violating your rights
How about NEVER......same dog food different can. This nonsense needs to STOP
If we can establish a un-bias 3rd party that makes police accountable for their actions and hopefully over rule some of the rulings that give cops free rein.
@@GrimJoe05 There actually are such entities, BUT for the most part, they are PAPER TIGERS no very little if ANY authority
We all know the solutions but this is exactly how our own government has declared war on us. Police are their enforcers.
Very impressed by how calm and collected the lady filming stayed despite the craziness of the circumstances she endured.
She also called their bluff - if it’s a medical emergency where’s the emt
Then at the end when they tried to bring up medical emergency - the county shouldn’t be using the police as nannies
I am a law-abiding citizen. I never consent to searches. No warrant, no entry. Be wise folks!
It must be hard when you truly realize people hate you in a way that would make them rejoice at hearing you've been killed. The hate some officers earn, either by true malice or incompetence, is that special kind of hate that extends beyond any rationale other than wanting to see them suffer.
According to what I read about this case was based on an anonymous caller. If the Police can raid our homes based on an anonymous, evidence less, calls, we have no rights at all. These Cops should be fired and arrested for assault, kidnapping and breaking and entering. I find it incredible that you give these Cops any credibility. They could have gone to the home and requested cooperation. When the people refused, one Cop could have watched the house and the other cop got a warrant.
Well said! I absolutely agree with EVERYTHING you my friend!
That's the way it USED to be handled but nowadays, they don't want permission, they just want to do it military style like a third world country...sad...........
@@SolarReturn1966 who the fuck told you in 3rd world countries cops act like yours?
See in Amerikkka your cops kill all day while in 3rd world countries all they ask is bribe. Now tell me whats worse? Give $5 or loose your life for absolutely nothing. See withoney you have nothing to loose with your life thats the end.
So maybe the 3rd world is your thug country you call Amerikkka. The land of thief's and cold blood killers with badges lol. Remember not to talk much if you don't know anything about 3rd countries. Very ignorant you are and thats what they teach best in the western world, is to stay ignorant and compare your fallen nation full of tryant cops who kill and gets paid to do so to a 3rd world country?
@@arkmuzikproductions you're an idiot. Cops kill innocent people every day everywhere.
They don't all the time on anymous calls
SolarReturn If the anonymous caller said the son was armed and dangerous would they have entered shooting? I saw a video where this happened. An anonymous call said the home owner was killing people and instead of checking out what was going on the homeowner opened his door to see what was going on outside and the Cops killed him. Totally unarmed. The door was well lit. The Cop said he felt he was in danger and shooting this innocent unarmed citizen, who didn’t have any idea what was going on, was the proper action to take. The Cops were all safe under cover and with bullet proof barricades. The Cop who killed the home owner was behind a shield on the side of the porch. He was never in any danger.
She should have closed the door and ignored them. Force them to break in.
They had no warrant, they should be fired.
@Thunder Chunky
If these cops break into the home without a warrant and violate their 4th Amendment rights you have the right to kill officers to protect yourself from harm. I consider any law enfarcement to be potentially deadly to me at ANY and all times, even though I am a 100% innocent citizen and always have been.
Always begin to record when cops approach. Talk to the cops through the door or not at all. They are not your friends or protectors and only a fool trusts cops these days.
The most dangerous moments of your life are when involved in a traffic stop or other encounter with cops, all with an armed cop there to "serve and protect" the system.
She gave the whole thing up when she allowed the one A-hole to enter the house!
Exigente circumstances would require that there be a warrant with the address and reasonable suspicion the suspect was at the location. The fact that the suspect's vehicle did not exist removes a reasonable suspicion the suspect is there.
"I'm just doing my job" isn't that the excuse used at Nerumberg
@bert smith
What data are you basing your words on
In Nam LT Cally ( spelling ) destroy a small village if i remember right in war business and life some people will cross the lines of right or wrong
Its possible some were as you say forice but others were just cold some may have been to young to speak up and some killed in cold blood
Its nice to post some data
"I was just following orders"
@@terriecotham1567 American soldiers raped and pillaged and murdered their own people during the Civil War. I don't see why spooks torturing war criminals is far fetched to you.
I don’t think the situations are the same. Doing my job in a mistaken belief that he is dutybound to enter a residence to save a person is different than knowingly following an order to kill people.
It may sound like splitting hairs, but I don’t think it is.
@@Barzins1 it's not splitting hairs at all. It's 2 cops acting outside of the law without a warrant on an unsubstantiated tip. If they get a search warrant approved based in actuall evidence then so be it. There was no such warrant, only suspicion based in an accusation. How would you like it if I was your neighbour and I accused you of harboring a criminal because you just didn't maintain your yard as well as I thought you should. Would you allow the police into your house warrantless for some random accusation because of an angry neighbours tip. The law feeds on people like this. Our founding fathers placed a set of constitutional rights that the government cannot break to protect the proud citizens of the USA against a tyrannical government. If you are a United States citizen then you will uphold and protect those constitutional rights until death. If not, then get the fuck out.
"my officer has to do what he has to do"
The second amendment exists for us to protect ourselves from tyrants "doing what they have to do"
Yeah if it happened more often they might be less arrogant, but who wants to go to prison for it? Being too comfortable has its drawbacks.
The two thugs with badges in this video should have been arrested and tried for battery, burglary, kidnapping and extortion. These two badged thugs are lucky they didn't pull that shit with an armed citizen who was ready to defend themselves and their property. This why we have the 2A.
@Daniel Garrett Dear poo-butt bootlicker, we all know cowards like yourself would never go against anyone your equal. That's why bootlickers and badged thugs pick on the unarmed and weak. You're out of your league son. You're also severely outnumbered. Buh-bye coward.
@Greg Moonen the 2nd amendment came to be, because they knew as an upper class formed in America, it would tend toward corruption...? Or was it something else?
@Greg Moonen ok fine, but these were guys who just shot their way out from under taxation without representation, and you don't think an understanding of men's hearts helped lead them to that choice?
I wish that my Mom and Dad would have got the cops on video. When they arrested me for not telling them something that they thought I knew. I could have had one hell of a lawsuit
This is one of the most fairbauditing channels
END QUALIFIED IMMUNITY AND GET RID OF THE POLICE UNION! Problem solved
Unions can be, and most cases are very important. However police unions are far too powerful and a government body can be too beholden to a police union. If any money was to be paid out through police misconduct let the union pay it. Plus of course, make all police have personal liability insurance
Qualified Immunity only applies when cops follow the law. These cops broke the law and their department settled out of court. Qualified immunity did not protect them.
Teachers unions and Police unions are the same - THE CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM!
You have that right.
Yes.... That statute must go and then you will see immediate police reform.
Someone claiming that another person is inside someone else's home is not exigent circumstance.
I8ijmcm4t8itiri00 was
It's hear say
@@dannymckee3557 there by not in anyway admissible.
I had lawyer try that on me mine objected in a sec said hear say judge agreed
Amen
It’s up to the deputies to make sure people rights are being uphold and the people who sued have all legal right to and they have a right to say no to a warrantless search.
COPSPLAINING IS A 12 LETTER 3 SYLLABLE WORD FOR LYING
Moral of the story: DO NOT ever open the door for police. NEVER!
Any danger you may be in is minor compared to getting involved with police.
Exactly they can sit there & talk amongst themselves... I'm under no obligation to help in their investigation
This has been a rule of mine for years. I don't even acknowledge that they are at the door.
Yup. I had a bench warrant issued for my arrest at one point. They showed up at my house one day. Knocked for like 10 minutes, then just left.
They knew I was there, but didn't actually see me, so they couldn't do jack without a warrant.
Funniest part, after they left, I called the courthouse and got the whole thing dismissed without any fines or detainment
Sue them personally in a civil court and take their homes
That's exactly what needs to be done. The offending officers should be sued personally, as well as the county, especially if the officers have a history of violating a individuals bill of rights. Joint and several liability.
Is what i said for months. ..sue personaly!
@@rockscousteau your so full of shit your eyes are brown.
Is there a statue of limitations on warrantless searches?
That would never stand up.Immunity.
7:31 - Hello from the Australian police doing a suspected drug search in Wentworth, NSW some time before 2007
After chubby was done with the search, and after the hubby was unlatched, Mama Bear should have "ordered" them off the property and taken hubby in the house and locked the doors and windows!
"""WHY ARE POS COPS SO AFRAID OF A CAMERA , BECAUSE THE CAMERA DON'T LIE AND THEY DO ............. FTP""
The camera deals with actuality, not subjective reality.
Hahaha i say flipping the pancakes
“I’am sorry you deal with low-life Liars Day in and Day Out”.
Referring to his Co-Workers.
First thing I thought of too!
Holy shit. I've been watching this channel for 6 or 8 months. I live in Fredericksburg, TX.
There should be no undisclosed settlements in any situation related to a government agency, especially the police. Any wrongdoing must be made public.
"I'm getting a lot of signs your not being truthful. "
ONE that's the kettle calling the pot black.
TWO what you're getting signs of is these people not willing to be railroaded by your BS.
Lie detectors are poor at telling the truth, his ability is negligible.
"Doing what you were told to do" is not an excuse. The Nuremberg trials determined that.
They were so concerned with the “medical emergency” that upon not finding what they were looking for they just stood the fuck around instead of going to find where they need to be.
The man they just shackled is getting old. Some might say he is elderly. Look how terrified the big strong police are of him. Cowardice is in their training, and they could care less how they treat us, so they can feel safe.