The Positive Side of the Next Battlefield Game
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 9 май 2024
- Twitch: / enders
Twitter: / endersfps
TikTok: / endersfps
Discord: / discord
Instagram: endersfps?...
Business contact: enders@s-tier.com
#battlefield #battlefield2042 #bf2042
Buy my merch here! merch.streamelements.com/enders
Battlefield training sessions: metafy.gg/@enders
Glytch Energy. Use code "ENDERS" for 20% off: t.co/CJWEAyeRmP?amp=1
Support me directly: streamelements.com/enders/tip
If you're looking to buy a game use my official 2Game affiliate link! t.co/xoG7KKCnS5?amp=1
PC:
GPU: Asus ROG Strix 3090 OC
CPU: AMD Ryzen 9 5950x
CPU Cooler: ARCTIC Liquid Freezer II 420mm
Case Fans: Noctua NF-A15 HS-PWM
Power Supply: EVGA SuperNOVA G3 850w
Ram: 32GB G.SKILL Trident Z Neo Series DDR4-4000 CL16 (2x16 GB)
Motherboard: Asus ROG X570 Crosshair Hero VIII
Case: Fractal Design Define 7 XL
Storage: Samsung 970 Evo Plus 250 GB + Sabrent Rocket 4.0 1 TB + Western Digital BLACK SERIES 1 TB 3.5" 7200RPM (x2)
Peripherals:
Mouse: CryoMods Custom Wireless ZA-13 imgur.com/a/rzQ4veN
Mousepad: Artisan Ninja FX Zero XL (Soft)
Keyboard: Custom build by @Cyktanic on twitter | YMDK Melody96, Gateron Ink Blacks V2 Lubed & Filmed, Drop MT3 Black-on-White Keycap Set, Brass Plate
Monitor: HP Omen X 27 (1440p, 240hz)
Headset: Beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro
AMP: Schiit Magni Heresy
DAC: Schiit Modius
Microphone: Shure SM57
Audio Interface: Scarlett Solo 3rd Gen
Facecam: Logitech BRIO
Chair: Herman Miller Aeron (Size B)
Sensitivity:
I play on between 25.4cm and 47cm per 360. No higher or lower. Find what YOU like! I'm not you!
Currently I play on a 33.5cm 360. 1600 DPI & GstInput.MouseSensitivity 0.002444 in the PROFSAVE_profile found in documents for BF 2042.
How to set sensitivity in PROFSAVE files, how to make a config file, and more: • The ULTIMATE Battlefie...
Uniform Soldier Aiming: OFF
I do not touch any zoom sensitivities.
Graphics Settings:
BF 2042: All low, Future Frame Rendering: OFF, DLSS: OFF, Nvidia Reflex: Enabled + BOOST (HEAVILY PC DEPENDENT!)
BF4: All low except mesh, textures, and effects are all on ULTRA
BFV: All low, GPU memory restriction: OFF, Future Frame Rendering: ON
BF1: All low, GPU memory restriction: OFF - Игры
Just remember folks, no matter what, do not pre-order.
Why not?
already preordered
@@Seanasaurus7560fool me once shame on you fool me twice I’m a dumbass
@@Seanasaurus7560 EA and other publishers and their investors only look at the earnings during the launch of a game. Especially EA and Battlefield need to take a lesson this time.
@@echo5733this is gone be the third time not the second time,
BF5, 2042 and now this
“The bar is so low, you can’t find it” lmao” 😂😂😂 that had me in stitches
We need James Cameron to dive deep
wasnt that funny.... enough glaze, there?
Future enders in about a 1.5 years "fuck guys, they made it worse"
I was just trying to imagine a world were the next battlefield is great and every Enders video I watch is him saying how great it is haha
This is EXACTLY what will happen. Without fail.
@@trautsj it is EXACTLY not what will happen
🤣🤣
The next battlefield is going to be really gay
Dont agree with the Gulf War setting but Bad Company 3....ABSO-FREAKING-LUTELY! They need to remain in the modern or near future for the next few BF games IMO, I dont want anymore of the WW2 or Golf anymore.
The biggest restriction with them doing WW1/2 era games, is that there just aren't that many options when it comes to vehicles, weapons, or customization. And the wide berth of options is a big part of what creates unique battlefield experiences - you could have 14 different vehicle types in one map. You could have 13 assault players on the team with completely different load outs.
For reference, BF4 released with *89* weapons. BF2042, according to a Reddit post in December 2023, had 22. I dont have the game so I can't verify but to go from 89 weapons on launch (not counting equipment) down to 22 is depressing.
golf war I don't think is bad fairly modern and hasn't really been done in video games other than indie titles
@@mercthejerk8945 I would argue the reason Gulf War hasnt been done is b/c it really wasn't "significant" when compared to other wars. I wouldn't mind more focus on the past 20 years, GWOT would be better than Gulf IMO. I would much rather get a Bad Company 3 though, something to continue the story with a single player/coop campaign
@@SuperAaronbennett you speak truth man
I am refusing to buy another DICE Battlefield Game. They do not like the franchise or their own community, not a single developer from the Battlefield 3 or 4 days is even left, who left after Battlefield 1. I think DICE needs to rebrand or change their name because its a totally different team now
Yup just a bunch of cod try hards making a copy of it and slapping the BF title on the game
I remind myself DICE isn’t a person, it’s part of a publicly traded company,
The folks that made 2042 weren’t the same as who made BF1
What if it is as good as bf3 bf4 and bf1 not saying it will be or shilling for dice at all but what if it is good will u still not buy it? I'm craving for a great bf 😢
@@CasualCodBoah it can't be. Battlefield 5 and 2042 are proof of that
People buy good games,@@CasualCodBoah , or are you Andrew Wilson’s stealth account?
✌🏼🤣👍🏼
NO Pre-ORDERS! Wait until after the holidays to order
Enders being positive, "BF2042 like undercooked chicken" since it was more like gas station sushi.
Rules of engagement. Do not preorder
You know how Disney killed Star Wars by making 1 trash movie after another with progressively more lazy writing?
I don’t put it past DICE trying to pull the same thing as a game developer. If they’re not taking any advice from competent players like Enders, I prefer to not get my hopes up.
LOL call of duty already is making a gulf war game.... it would be better to be set in 2020 like Battlefield 4 was.... this is a good opinion,
A big plus is the fact that they aren't (hopefully) going to be dealing with a pandemic. Pretty sure between covid and trying to upscale to 128 players during such a crazy time didn't help matters.
good point, hopefully they stay at 64 players aswell
I hope we don't deal with ww3 within a few years
@@SiMeTiMe getting the most kills / pts out of 128 is crackish fun, 64 will get old too quick for some after enjoying 128
@@railasvuo Hey at least it will give them Ideas for a semi-futuristic battlefield title.
@@SiMeTiMe IMO the problem wasn't that the server slots were increased, it was how it was implemented. doubling the server slots was a ridiculous call which directly caused multiple problems. before launch the devs seemed to have known about the problems and their causes, yet they didn't, couldn't, or weren't allowed to fix them.
I love how your "positivity" is essentially "Hey, they next one couldn't possibly be worse than this POS, right?"
Don't listen to the haters, Enders. You do you. That's what got you where you are.
If we just get a solid battlefield game I probably won't play any other fps for 5 years or something
Same. Shooters are so shit atm. Only one that held my interest post bf3 was rainbow 6 siege.
@@MrJabbothehut unpopular opinion but bf5 was very good for me ( I start playing it just a few months age though) it's what I play right now
Crazy how long the window has been open for a game to come in and swoop up the FPS industry... How can they all get it so wrong?!
@@griffin1366 my guess is that because it's the most popular genre of games (apart feom sports games), monetisation and spamming them out has completely ruined how much detail and care is put into these games.
@@griffin1366because Fortnite happened and gaming changed forever
Being in the gym and listening to Enders 😅
glazing dude like a donut
@@shaeunaplaysyt9999 what does that mean
Enders, I know you're not being negative. The community needs to get a grip because you always give honest commentary.
*they need to expand the Grand Bazaar map from BF3 and build an entire 24/7 campaign mode around it with never ending waves of enemies and a day night cycle* 👍
Exactly, if they make a game that is 7/10 at launch, we're good. Massive "if", though.
I just started playing bf5 just to see what I missed by not playing it. While i prefer modern era FPS, i was really struck by how fundamentally different it is as a predecessor to 2042. It was like all if the devs for 2042 weren't involved in past BF games or played past BF games. As one could simply go back one game and find a pretty solid base to work from if just copied to 2042.
now. Go back one generation to Battlefield One. and you will truly be amazed.
you thought right, all the talented and experienced devs began leaving DICE after BF1 and basically all were gone for bf2042.
The movement system in battlefield 5 is so much better with the high vault, crouch run, jump roll and laying prone on your back. Every other bf game sucks for movement its so sad, devs didnt put in 100% effort they put in 25% effort
I personaly think it would be cool if we would see another game from a era we havent had yet, maybe something like Vietnam war or Korean war. it would be semi modern, but also not like super modern.
remember guys, don't preorder, if you even want to save this franchise
"medium rare chicken" 💀
I don't mind if the next battlefield is in futuristic setting as long as not rushed and terrible like 2042
if it is indeed a tremendous live service game, it should span all eras. Give me all the famous battles from WW1 WW2 Vietnam to modern.
I don't think they'll get rid of specialist, EA needs them to sell skins and packs
How do you release an fps game with no scoreboard.
Just some quick micro points. Reduce the speed, it shouldn't be faster than bf5. No auto heal anything, if you can bunny hop and slide several feet you're playing cod not bf, no one shot weapons, weapons that may be one shot only one shot with a headshot, ballistic shields are dumb. My 2 cents.
I agree with you that we can't say the next game is going to be worse, but I'm just expecting the worst to not be disappointed when the game comes out. I won't pre order and I'll be sure to watch a lot of gameplay videos first. I'm curious if they could actually pleasantly surprise me with their next game because I have always loved Battlefield (except 2042 and 5).
Nah we need a damn Vietnam game!!! Cmon we haven’t got one since black ops 1
last night i had a dream that the next battlefield is bfbc3 and bro i cannot tell you how happy i was
Enders: game goes full milsim with no minimap
EA: wait! he said we can take minimap, and scoreboard out if we do a milsim game... that info is gold!!!
At this point I will pay full price for Battlefield 3 or Battlefield 4 remastered,hopefully next game is good i missed the days playing Battlefield 3 after school all day.
I'm so happy to read every battlefield video has top comments saying NOT TO PRE ORDER!!!
When you played bfv, did you think the next title could be worse? That is all the reason i need. They surprised us in so many ways with things you would never think of with more than 10 minutes of bf experience. No scoreboard, no voice, no squad management. Rooftop capture points. Hovercraft going up walls. Coverless maps. Trying another br mode after failing just before, and again putting it behind pay wall when the alternatives are free. Just to name a few things. And they already proofed that they are resistant to learning from past mistakes or success. And no matter how often they fix things like net code, map design, gun play and recoil and input, they find a way to break it again. Only shop bugs get fixed in 24h. I'm so curious what we will actually get, but to me, anything is plausible, and we will not see it coming.
Yup
Great video love the content but at 8:20 ppl in the comments saying "That sounds awesome" was it for me😂😂HILARIOUS!
No being burnt with pre order this time
I'd say I'm worried about the next game failing to meet my expectations, except I don't really have any expectations left.
Wait. Does anyone know any players optimistic about the next BF?
I just wanna be able to squad up with some mates, choose a reasonably populated server with a decent ping and stay in it with my bros till we choose to leave...😢
things that give me hope if they happen like this:
they go back to 64 player modell which could lead to better maps and better server and client performance
the game is next gen only so they dont have to create it for that many platforms
they go back to classes
and they have more time / dont waste years of development making it a battleroyal / extraction type game or what ever they first did in 2024
Maybe 100 player mode or 80 if they could find a balance with bigger numbers and good maps
@@hectorjuarez6723 64 was a good sweetspot, why change it
"Tremendous live service" ... Direct quote from EA's CEO. Three very scary words when you know he couldn't give a fuck about that game but rather what THE PROMISE of the game could mean for the yearly earnings reports and how happy it will make the share holders.
Before watching the video: That we now know that we have stay away from it as far as possible?
" will listen to community this time.. lessons were learned
THE BASICS SHOULD BE LIKE THIS:
BF3 & BF4 MAPS IN BF1 ENGINE WITH BF5 MOVEMENT
4 CLASSES
64PLAYER
COMMANDER MODE NEW MISSILES AND ARTILLERY SYSTEMS
MORE VEHICLE LOADOUT CONTENT
Q5FANTAN RETURN?
NO BOTS
They’ve got a formula for easy money if they so choose to follow it. As long as they put 3 tornadoes per map I’ll be happy
Another thing that probably helps is that the current DICE team has more experienced with Frostbite and map creation overall, afaik the 2042 team was not very expiernced given that it was relatively new devs working and old devs leaving
Does this excuse the lack luster launch?
To a small extent, yes, especially with the pandemic at the time
But it's not the pandemic anymore, nor is the team as inexperienced as before
Like you said, it's now down to if the team WOULD even do the things mentioned, not CAN
It's 99% likely that the next BF will be better than 2042, but realistically things can always be worse. There is still that 1% chance that it's worse than 2042. We can't know for certain until the beta but I would rather be in the mindset of it has the potential to be worse than be set and stone on it 100% being better, cause as we know DICE do what DICE does, and their latest track record doesn't reflect much faith. I hope it is better, of course but I'm staying on the fence.
Considering coalition forces lost 31 tanks and Iraq lost 3300 in the Gulf War, I certainly would hope it'd be an alternate history spinoff...
A Class system in a Class system based shooting franchise? Brutal expectations, man
You are absolutely overwhelming negative about battlefield. I hope I never see hate IRL in my life, like I see the hate you have for this game/franchise. And you can't even realize that
Because the game deserves the hate. What are you even talking about?
Something worth pointing out is that Andrew Wilson never played 2042 during its development, likely because it was never in a playable state. The fact that the next battlefield game is already in a state to be presented to the CEO of EA to play this far out from release is, I think, a really good sign.
How dose this guy not get burnt out playing 2042 this much.
sometimes i play for him
In my opinion they should remake bf3/4 instead of a new game
great vid as usual....we are happy you keep the content quality at a respectable level, espacially with all the bf-fps genre drought we have been having the past months if .I just hope xdefiant is just somewhat decent at this point,especially for a ftp game made by ubisoft....
I remember commenting on an enders video saying "never seen a positive enders vid" and that was supposed to be a knock on dice and ea. The positive vibes will come if the game is good. Look at how people talk about bf1 or 3. We need a revival in what makes the franchise great. Pls dice. 🙏
I can see the next Battlefield being announced as a JRPG after how bf2042 was handled
Preach on Brother, EA not only boned us with the BFV content, they double bones us with 2042!
The thing about bad company 3 is, can we really trust dice to do a good job of it? Personally I’d rather have no more bad company games than see them absolutely butcher it by cramming unicorn skins and gen alpha humour into the game to try and be “relevant”
Big open maps like hourglass have their place. Its just about mitigating some of the issues of such maps for infantry
"No way it could be worse" making popcorn and watching.
gulf war would please me so much, but imagining it with stupid "nO pAts" specialists just does it for me
And 64 players only fuck 128 players that way they can make smaller and hopefully better maps
I wonder if there ever will be a definitive edition of BF1942, BF2 Bad Company and BF3 (or even BF4 maybe?) Portal in BF2042 is pathetic and sad. There are a plethora of maps that could have been implemented inside of portal, especially now that older BF games get sunset. Not to mention the implementation of the campaigns or having community based maps and missions just like in BF4. Tragic and a truly missed opportunity imo. A separate definitive or hd or whatever edition aside from the next bf game would be nice.
Mean, I think it’s not gonna be up to snuff and I think it might be down to the culture inside of EA dice. There was a video put out by one of the original fallout devs that kind of explains why games are so slow to produce nowadays.
Regardless though I think I’m gonna like it that being said, I’m pretty easy to please when it comes to battlefield as long as I don’t feel like my guns are in accurate or way too short range there’s some satisfying movement in the game and I’m not constantly being dominated by things like snipers And vehicles and usually pretty happy happy another words just give me good shooting Shuti bang bang.
There is no way Angel will do it again, so the next battlefield can't be worse
so..... they're going to fuck the next game up. We all know what is coming. Let's not kid ourselves.
Basically they need to make the game for hardcore battlefield people who wants competition and competitive matches. Like you said, screw the no score board, that stupid portal instead of browsers, no more of the 128 player stupid modes, leave out bots in online play , keep the bots in the campaign where they belong. But I guess I'm just dreaming.
no pre-orders
Maybe give players a choice to have a parachute or the wingsuit?
I kinda liked the specialists until they started nerfing them.
No matter where it takes place it needs to have a Kandahar Giant mission....
I learned my lesson by preordering BF V. It'll never happen again. I'd like a combo of BF 3, 4 and I.
What about a more tactical setting like Vietnam?
It’s already been done.
@@mrd7374 but like more modern Yk?
2:02 yo nah that was disgusting
Hoping for 128 player maps done right, no rework required and the Plus system, which was a game changer, cant play an fps game without it after learning it
You mean the game isn’t going to be Battlefield: Infinite Warfare. 😄. But seriously, yeah specialists are weird. Like the abilities are good but why limit them so much to specific characters instead of just making it a way to customs your character?
There was nothing wrong with suppression, it was actually an awesome part of 3&4.
Rewarding people for missing shots isn’t a good gameplay mechanic.
Suppression was poorly implemented in most games, but it was the only thing stopping LMGs from being useless, so in 2042 when it was removed completely they just turned into ARs with nut sacks and box magazines
@@LuckyPWAlmgs need a purpose other than being an assault rifle with extended mags. Obviously there should be some changes. Perhaps suppression would enable if you deploy your bipod
@@LuckyPWAcorrect on a spreadsheet but not in the context of other things.
They removed suppression and removed a balancing metric. Bf4 lmg's became 200 round laserbeams. Bf1 lmg's were hold mb1 simulators, bf2042 all weapons are laserbeams. All they had to do was tone down the effect for AR's and SMG's shooting at you in bf3.
@@boyishdude1234 sure as long as it doesn’t make your aim go ballistic it’s fine, but the moment you reward someone for missing shots by making the other players bullets go sporadic or camera get all wobbly is the moment I think you’ve made a flawed system. From a realistic standpoint I get it but battlefield isn’t a realistic game. From a balancing standpoint for LMGs I get it, but you can look at a game like call of duty, and even though I despise that series, they seem to do a decent job with LMGs without a silly suppression system (at least from what I know).
How about letting us Customize our own Soldier instead of forcing us to use the ones they create. _ You could micro transaction clothing items.
I really wanted to see Bad Company 3 before but glad it never became a thing. EA and DICE is ruining everything they touch. Sad to see a once on top of their game studio lose all its vision and talent.
Due to the layoffs in the gaming industry, dice can hire a bunch of developertalent, should be a positive thing, right?
Wooow this video is so positive enders! It just raised my vibe so high that I can't wait for the next BF announcement to preorder it! In fact I'll create 3 more EA accounts so I can buy 3 more licenses to better enjoy this awesome experience! Let's gooo bois!!! 😄
I just opened RUclips because i wanted to watch enders, and i see a video uploaded 4 minutes ago lol.
the positive side is the SHIRRYYY AHH players who will still pre order
"medium rare chicken" 😅😅😅
You could blame Covid WFH for some of the 2042 release woes. I'm optimistic about the next game due to all the feedback they got in recent years.
BF1942 has a mod called desert combat. Still going to if you want too play the gulf war era.
If they released a bad company 3 oh my god i hope its pops off. Just hearing that gives me chills
If they do. They will censored it so hardcore. It would not be the same.
Thanks!
Not to worry, I'm sure Dice polled a ton of feminist to get a better understand of the do's, don'ts, and how's for the best BF ever.
I play on ps4, now that it’s over is BF ever going to open the full maps for ps4.
Negativity towards 2042/EA/DICE for the bait and switch that passed for a BF game, is warranted, and we need more of it.
1:58 nice trickshot lol
Enders said it all, also the T system for changing weapons on the fly should go as well
Lol, maybe Enders can find something positive in the next BF. I will only be holding the next game in contempt until it can prove otherwise.
If they wanna make another Hourglass, hows about they code and model the building interiors lol.
I think *some* milsim would be cool. Armor mechanics? Yes please, at least hit boxes or something. No Armor, gives +mobility +reload, Light armor gives you a small chest rig with a plate that stops 20% dmg, Medium armor gives you a little more coverage and 35%, Heavy armor gives you the Dozer look with the shoulder plates, the groin protector and a full Lv4 Plate, and stops 50-60% dmg but gives you -mobility, -run speed, -reload speed or something.
But the rest of the stupid milsim garbage like no minimap, healing taking forever, moving super slow, organ damage, 1 taps....fk the 1 taps, naw......a hair bit slower paced overall though? Yes please.
And ive played Arma 3, 1300 hours give or take, its honestly GARBAGE........many people might tout it as amazing, but no, its trash. Its buggy as fuck, its glitchy as hell, AI are cracked, armor is irrelevant and its about as far from "milsim" and "reality" as BF or COD.....its just overly clunky and awful to play. Cars flipping randomly, bases exploding for no reason, AI walking through walls, the game glitching me up onto the side of a house and then dropping me 10 feet to my death(no im not joking), the grossly exaggerated recoil and weapon sway. Vehicle combat is ass, armor is completely non-existant. No, those "Milsim" games are simply 1 tap fests. Ballistics are not at all realistics. 450m away and you just point and click at the target...I doubt it lol....guy in a lvl 5 Heavy armor plate and you go through it in 1 shot...umm, no?
I honestly would love to see a game actually more like the game Caliber in pacing and TTK. Armor mechanics kinda like Tarkov and maybe an advanced medical system where yes, you have to stop to bandage, but not overly nutz like what you can do in Arma where you gotta bandage every bullet wound, do CPR, give blood, give epis, give adenosine...no not that advanced. A Milsim light? A game that requires teamwork, coordination and tactics, and isnt run and gun OCD like COD and BF but doesnt go as far in the "milsim" direction as Arma, Squad and them........
Yeah no milsim shit in battlefield. This is an arcade shooter
leave, and take your armour crap with you.
all I'm asking for is the game, at the very least, maintains a military austhetic theme and doesn't turn into fortnite like call of duty
I actually liked the suppression system in previous games.
the extreme amount of cope on display will age so badly
and this is as someone who was cautiously optimistic about 2042’ specialists before the beta released
2042 might be a bad game, but I think that, no matter what, despite what's been said, in spite of everything, regardless of what happens, come what may, for all that you may have heard, current precedent notwithstanding, in any case, nevertheless, the next Battlefield will be a video game.
I really hope not >:C
It’s pretty hard to be positive when there aren’t many things positive about the game lol
Alternate reality cult war could sequel or lead up to bf2 and bfbc3
Only positive thing would be is if I’m never happens.
ill just say this 2042 never had properly functioning mouse input.