Scholes won games scored goals created chances but like Gary said he controlled games and ran the midfield just like xavi. Xavi doesn't have the most goals but he's 1 of the best ever.
@@AM-er9oi then you know nothing he did far more than that scored 107 goals but it was his passing that was special, the way he spread the ball and controlled games was incredible he kept the ball and would mostly play deeper pick the ball up and play it back, busquets has played 505 games and has 49 assists with 14 goals and is 1 of the best.
Paul Scholes big games are always forgotten because it was always about United. Not about an individual. Many of us remember the treble season. FA cup final was known as Sheringham final as he got subbed in early after Keane got injured. Few remember that Scholes scored and assisted in both the goals and controlled the midfield. Scholes scored against inter Milan away game when United were struggling. Scholes against Barca, we all remember the goal which won us the semis. Apart from controlling games, he notched up important goals as well. It's a ridiculous argument that Scholes didn't turn up for important games
Marketing bro, Lampard and Gerard as they were the face of their teams they got more views and marketing, but for me Scholes was the better midfielder 🤷🏻♂️.
None of that compares to Gerrards goals in Istanbul or the facup final especially the Istanbul header that kick starts the greatest comeback in ucl history
I remember reading somewhere .. "it doesn't matter if Paul Scholes isn't your favorite player ... because he is the favourite player of your favorite player!" ... outside English football i.e. ... 😂😂 Pirlo: Paul Scholes is the best ever others are just pretenders lol
@@tomparry12 “There is no doubt for me that Paul Scholes is still in a class of his own. He’s almost untouchable in what he does. I never tire of watching him play. You rarely come across the complete footballer, but Scholes is as close to it as you can get. One of my regrets is that the opportunity to play alongside him never presented itself during my career.” - Zinedine Zidane
Avi Sen “Is je the best in the world? He might not get the attention of Messi or Ronaldo but yes, I think he just might be!”- Zidane on Gerrard... He also wanted him to come to real to partner him in midfield but gerrard said no to him and Perez
SAF said that Gerrard 'is the most influential player in England bar none' during Scholes' prime also called him the only true heir to Keane and said " for me Gerrard is Keane"
Scholes was ridiculous. He made the most delicate touch to a long splitting ball look so easy... one that sticks with me.. the little touch he makes before Ronald is header goal in the CLF is simple, delicious and perfect. For that can watch it over and over and over....... and the fact that he’s so humble is testament to his character. Legend
He would literally touch the ball down like any professional footballer and people would wank all over it. Gerrards clear, he did it with a bunch of cabbages as his teammates
Depends what you want from the midfield player. To control a match: Scholes To score goals from midfield: Lampard To grab his team by the scruff of its neck: Gerrard
Jamie Monks more personal achievements than both of them combined , 2nd most goals and wasn’t put in a already world class team, while Liverpool was a team being built from the ground up on a relatively low budget and finishing 8th most seasons to success , Gerrard had more of an impact than the other two and was the more talented footballer
I can understand the argument for all 3 to be fair Gerrard is probably the most complete midfielder, Lampards timing was the best I’ve ever seen from a cm but scholes for me was the best he was an absolute genius you could put a bag over his head and he would still find an amazing pass that cuts open the defence the man was the best!
Ok. If he was so good at passing, how many assists did he have? Look at Lampard numbers. If you also take into account the goals then it's not even a discussion. Lampard miles ahead of both.
Scholes. The consistency of the man was unparalleled. Gerrard for carrying a bunch of donkeys for, 90% of his career and Lampard for the sheer number of goals he'd get from midfield.
@@prosperchidexogbodo5386 Wouldn't agree 100%, he did play with some of the world best at their peak. Owen, Xabi, Masch, Torres, Suarez, Cou. But yea, the rest of the team are usually trash Still Scholes for the win tho
I never understood why people use Gerrard's "poor" teammates as a positive. When he played for England,he was actually worse,KO-ing England from multiple tournaments. No one says Scholes had to play with Heinze or Howard,Kieran Richardson or Luke Chadwick,Djemba Djemba,Bebe Cleverly,Foster,Welbeck Gerrard and Lampard were world class,from 05-10,in their best position only,at CAM They were massively exposed as CM's in international tournaments,neither had the discipline,or game management to control midfield,even against Algeria or the U.S They were pool players,running around the table,potting balls as fast as possible,perfect for the Premiership. Scholes was world class,from 95-13,in four different positions. Even as a Irishman,to my dying day I will always rue the fact that England never played Scholes and Carrick as their two CM's They knew their games inside out,have huge big game experience,a winning mentality,and Fergie in their head when things got tough. They were snooker players,patiently weighing up the options,conserving energy,knowing where the next shot will go.
Jaime going on about big game goals. Paul Scholes scored that wonder goal against Peps Barclona to take Man Utd into Champions league final. He also scored in a Fa Cup final to help Manchester United win the treble. He also came out of retirement and helped Fergie win his final title at the age of 38. Scholes and Gerrard were done by their early to mid thirties.
@@williamlillicrapp7601 stats and awards mean jack shit when talking about scholes he wasn't that sort of player he controlled the game and made football look easy.
Scoring goals isn’t the top priority of a midfield player. Scholes controlled the game and you could pass him the ball confidently knowing he will never play a bad pass and do something special if ever an opportunity arrises. The consistency he did this with was unparalleled to me which is why Scholes is the best out of the bunch in my opinion.
Paul Scholes was without question the greatest Midfielder England had for the Last 25 Years! Easily in the Top 5 Midfielders in the World! But I have respect for both Gerrard & Lampard as well! Could you Imagine if Scholes, Gerrard & Lampard were in a 3 Man Midfield for England during Euro 2004 & World Cup 2006? Possible Team (2004-2006) 4-1-2-3: Robinson, Neville, Ferdinand, Terry, A.Cole, Scholes, Gerrard, Lampard, Walcott, Crouch, Rooney Subs: James, Carragher, Bridge, Carrick, Beckham, J.Cole, Owen Mentions: Campbell, Brown, Hargreaves, S.Wright-Phillps, Heskey
Scholes scored the winner in the FA Cup final, and a banger in the semi final against Barcelona, and won 11 premier league titles, 11 more than Slippy G
Scholes all day. He’s the Ultimate. All 3 are insanely good. Gerard carried that middle of the road team for years. Lampard scored 20 goals 10 TIMES! On fantastic squads! If anything, people don’t give Lampard enough credit. They usually banter on about about Scholes and Gerard
I'm a Chelsea fan, but Scholes hands down. Any player that can dictate the tempo of the other 19 outfield players on the pitch is a genius. Obviously the other 2 were brilliant players though in their own right.
Part of the reason why people dislike Liverpool fans even when they were not a threat for 30 odd years is that most Liverpool kept re-iterating that their players were the best in the world. Like an illogical broken record.. year after year.. it was so annoying.. When Xavi, Zidane the best players in that position say Scholes was the best.... do you think the opinion of a liverpool defender is important?
I really don't think Liverpool fans or Jamie Carragher have said that for the last 30 years with the exception of Gerard. Many Liverpool fans concede that man united had a better players when they were winning all the trophies years ago. What do you even on about?
Neville is 100% right for me. Scholes was something different. He controlled the game, pulled the strings and had a wonderful technique. You can rank Gerard and Lampard where Gerard is always nr 1 engine and leader in the midfield.
@@tomparry12 They are all different - but in my opinion Scholes tops the list. Scholes was without a doubt the most technical out of the three. Good technique is what I believe is the most important attribute a midfielder must have. When you think of the great midfielders of the past - xavi, Iniesta, yaya toure, viera, zidane, KDB etc.. (I know there are more but you get my point) all these players were technically brilliant. although lampard and Gerrard were good they weren’t the most technical of footballers - they were the typical English player who worked hard, did the basics well & had a mean - accurate long ball. Gerard was hard working, a true leader. He was brilliant defensively - could have been a defender easily, had a great shot, and read the game well. His presence and aura on and off the field was essential to his team. lampard was a revolution in that he made goal scoring from midfield fashionable. His positional awareness was second to none, it’s no accident that he always seemed to be at the right place at the right time. Like Thomas muller he read the game in the final third so well that he Kept getting into positions that would allow him to either create chances or score. having said this Gerrard and Lampard didn’t have the technical ability to be true string pulling midfielders that most great midfielders tend to be. Gerard had alonso & guys like cotinho to do this and lampard had ballack & deco etc.. with scholes he was the man - pulled the strings and had the technique to create something from nothing - in the tightest spaces. Be it by dribbling or finding a pass in the most unlikely of circumstances - he had it all. a big reason why England failed - (among others) was the lack of technical players. Although in 2006 England had a great squad their best players didn’t have the technical players around them (as they did at their clubs) to truly flourish. players like scholes were actually very un English. Which is all the more impressive considering he still managed to make it up the ranks and become a true PL great! 
@@tomparry12 all I am saying that Scholes was more technical and he was more suited for European football. He was better than both as he could adapt himself and was more consistent
I thought the same...even tho i'd pick Gerrard-Scholes-Lampard in this order
3 года назад+3
United fans say scholes Liverpool fans say Gerrard Chelsea fans say Lampard The rest say scholes. Don't believe me, then take a look at Zidane, Iniesta, Xavi etc.
@@harvey_t presumably your suggesting my life is boring old bean! Well yours equally so, oh the irony! Have a good day, ah that gave me a laugh, thankyou!
I’ve always wondered why they were never played as a 3 in midfield for England? They would dominate games in the middle of the park and create / score so many goals
Scholes was one of the most important engines in since he came through the youth in Fergie’s team until he retired, the amount of leagues won puts him a cut above the rest, yes he was surrounded by quality but he still shone as absolutely unbelievable, Gerrard was a close second and Lampard 3rd
3.25 from this moment Gary goes on rampage and each and every thing he said is 101%true . I remember Andreas Iniesta said once that when he was at la Masia the most frequent name they herd of any player or midfielder was only Paul scholes. And when xavi was asked about who is the best midfielder he had ever faced without any hesitation he said Paul scholes,after ucl 2011 final which Barcelona won xavi goes to scholes to ask for his shirt. Once Pirlo said that his biggest regret was that he never had played with Paul scholes 4.01 he is very very annoying done nothing in English squad and dude has noly player 38games for England from 1999-2010 and missed a penalty.
1. Scholes, 2. Lampard, 3. Gerrard. In 2004 Eriksen got it wrong. He should have kept Scholes in the middle in the 'regista' role (which he had already proved he could do at elite level) and played Gerrard on the left (not his position but he was good enough to have done a job there). Scholes was the best English player ever in that deeper central role: long passing, resisting pressure and laying off the ball, controlling tempo and volleying, shooting from outside the box. Ok, Xavi and Pirlo were probably even better at some of these, but Scholes was a composed finisher in front of goal too! Headers, chipping the keeper, side foots in the corner. He started as a striker and it never left him. I would say these 3 were the best ever England midfielders of any era along with Paul Gascoigne and Bobby Charlton.
Iniesta : " Without doubt, my biggest regret in Football is not playing with Paul Scholes. One day, at La Masia, Frank Rijkaard walked in and said, "Today, we don't train, we are going to watch a DVD." We sat for 3 hours watching Paul Scholes highlights. It was the best day of my life. Me, Xavi, Ronaldinho and a young Lionel Messi, in awe of him. It was then that i decided my first born would be called Paul. He's 5 now, and every time i look at him he reminds me of that day at la Masia." - settles it
I don't think Lampards number of assists gets the credit it deserves, stayed at the highest level for a number of years, finished second to Ronaldinho for the ballon do'r and once the most valuable player. Gerrards made countless errors in big games, back pass against France which led to a 2-1 loss, the own goal against chelsea in a cup final, the infamous slip and the back pass to Drogba in a 2-0 loss in 2010. Scholes is simply unique, controls the pace of the game something only a few players of that calibre can do, Alonso, Xavi, Iniesta and Pirlo.
Alonso,xavi,iniesta and pirlo are margins ahead of scholes. SAF tried to replace him with Veron and that says alot. He was a great player don't get me wrong, but he's never won Toty, player of the season for man utd either, he wasn't even the best midfielder because man United's playmaking came from the wings. Gerrard and lampard were serial contenders for ballondors. Gerrard being in the Toty 8 time. Lampard and Gerrard are astronomically higher in the podiums compared to scholes in every category. Please stop this.
Carragher never lets Neville finish. He's always wanting to prove him wrong which tells me his ground shaky to begin with 'Gerrard clutches the big games' I remember him clutching us the title when he slipped and let Demba Ba through, thanks Stevie. No bias from Carra either with Stevie being a Liverpool player an all that.
They all are great players! But if Carra puts it like "In terms of goals scored" then why not see" how many titles one" So Scholars won more titles than Gerard and Lampard together.
Unbiased Arsenal fan, the way I see it they're all different types of CMs. All very equally gifted, if the top 6 were all given the chance to have one of those at their best they would pick different players based on what they lacked, that's how even they all were. Liverpool would take Gerrard, hes the most energetic Klopp style player. City would take Scholes, very Guardiola player, him and De Bruyne would just dictate the game. United not really sure, with Fernandes and Pogba there if a third one would work, so maybe a direct swap with Pogba for Scholes or maybe Gerrard who would be better for getting more goals. Spurs no clue really maybe Scholes to try and control the game a bit more. Chelsea probably Lampard as they lack goals from midfield, maybe Gerrard as has more energy, no need for Scholes particularly. Arsenal I would almost certainly take Lampard for the goals alone, were struggling to find many goals at the moment and he would be essential for that.
Henry put this whole debate to bed anyway when he said Scholes Henry was a BEAST and part of an unreal Arsenal side they were only afraid of Scholes That says it all really I think Pro players opinions are everything
1. Scholes. 2 Gerrard. 3 Lampard. As far as England goes, Gerrard and Lampard never really worked well together in midfield but if England had played a 3 in midfield with Scholes sitting and Lampard and Gerrard ahead of him I think that would have been a formidable midfield.
All three different types of players. This pains me to say but Scholes was probably better with how SAF used him then Gerrard for me and then Lamps. But put all of them on their other teams and I don't think any debate would be brought up.
1. Gerrard - The most complete midfielder out of the 3. Could score like Lampard, could peng a ball like Scholes, could defend better than both, scored screamers for fun, better leadership, Scholes and Lampard had the advantage of better players around them. Gerrard had to carry some really shit players on his back and won trophies on his own.
Sir Klopp Gerrard had a midfield of Mascherano and Alonso and still couldn’t win a prem title. They are uncomparable. Scholes is comparable to Xavi and Iniesta, Gerrard isn’t.
RiiDGE exactly, that team in the mid to late 2000s had Torres, Mascherano, Alonso, Arbeloa, Reina, Carragher, Hyypia, Kuyt and Crouch. All of them were world class or close to it and scousers and media spread the narrative that gerrard played in an average team as if he had to carry them.
Areesh Kirmani was Frank Lampard or Paul Scholes ever called the best in the world by Zidane, or one of the best by Thiery Henry? Let alone Gerrard has won more individual awards, more Ballon D’or nominations than both of them. Gerrard was the better player. If Gerrard left Liverpool for Chelsea, he would have won everything, during the 08/09 season, Gerrard still scored 16 goals with 11 assists, only Torres had more goals.
Alexandre Bray Xavi and Iniesta have stated that Scholes is the best midfielder of the last 25 years. Pele said he was better, CR7 said he was better (biased yes but still), messi said he was better, even arbeloa who was gerrards team mate said scholes was better. Pirlo didn’t get nominated for ballon dors and kante did, does that mean kantes better than pirlo? obviously not.
I am die hard Chelsea but Scholes is a footballer's man he was an absolute genius on the ball and probably the best player to wear an England shirt since gazza
In today's game, scholes would be every manager's dream player, he was so underrated because people see the moments not the people who were behind the moment. Scholes was the reason why Manchester United played such an attacking and expansive football, with one diagonal ball he just bypass the whole middle of a team
If the conversation was who was the best goalscorer, lampard and gerrard are above Scholes, its who was the best player and Paul Scholes is the most naturally gifted midfielder ever in the premier league.
He did give a fair assessment after that but you were too busy writing this asinine comment. Since when did goals become the only barometer for a MIDFIELDER?
@@shrey9699 Carragher did give a fair assesment but he mainly pointed out the goals both Gerrard and Lampard came up with in big games and they both did. Scholes however had everything as a midfielder, every range of pass, could score any type of goal and every game the game was played at his tempo. All 3 were great but Scholes was best in my opinion
A diamond with hargreaves as the pivot gerrard and scholes im front and lampard furthest forward would have been one of the best midfields of all time.
Lamps - goals for team #1 Gerrard - influence on team #1 Scholes - control of the game #1 Scholes is number 1 of the three because he won a gazillion more trophies than the others
Scholes, Gerrard Lampard for me. Look at when Man Uniteds dominance started and when it ended, and then check out Scholes career and se how they line up almost perfectly. He even had to unretire to secure League title nr 20. Man United have been able to replace som descent players over the years, but not even close to replacing Scholes.
Zidane said Gerrard was better than Messi and Ronaldo during his prime. These quotes mean little. Most people saying Scholes aren’t old enough to remember him play and base their opinion on those quotes. Scholes by his own admission saw himself as an attacking midfielder, both Gerrard and Lampard were better than him in that regard. People’s opinion of Scholes has been completely revised since Barca’s tiki taka football lifted the game to new heights. Because Scholes played in that style people equate him to being that good, on reflection he was world class in possession and passing, mediocre to poor in terms of tackling and capable of world class goals although not having a massive return on them. He was a world class player but he was not a God like some of the kids make him out to be. Gerrard’s passing was on par with Scholes, his shooting ability was arguably better and he had the indefinable quality of leadership and being able to turn games in Liverpool’s favour when they had no right to. A big game player scoring in the Europa league, Champions league, league cup and Fa cup finals. He was wanted by both Chelsea and United at a time when they had Lampard and Scholes respectively. He could play any position to the highest level, a generational talent and one that doesn’t get the respect he deserves. Gerrard then Scholes then Lampard.
Veron was bought because ManUtd added strength in depth to their midfield. ManUtd had just won 3 PL titles in a row when Veron was bought so I don't know what point Carragher was trying to make with that comment.
Teey 1 You’re pointing out exactly what I mean without realising. He won less major trophies than Scholes and Lampard since he choose to be loyal said no 3 times when Mourinho called. If you want to compare individual honours however, the other two doesnt come close to the best ever English midfielder.
Roy Keane Sorry my French but only dumbnuts like you wouldn’t realise it’s far more impressive to carry a weak Liverpool side to a European trophy against AC Milan, than play a small role in an already great Manchester Utd or Chelsea side.
Lampard was easily the best. Most goals, Most assists, best overall defensively. Also the best in big games and moments which is proven by the stats - everyone says it was Gerrard because he played for Liverpool but it is Lampard if you look at the facts. Lampard is the 4th highest scorer in the quarter, semi and finals of the champions league, above the likes of Rooney and Lewandowski and he has the third highest number of match winning goals in premiership history, only below Shearer and Rooney. He never let Chelsea down with big misses or fouls or mistakes, never missed a big penalty for Chelsea. He controlled matches for Chelsea just as much as Scholes did for United it just gets overlooked because he was a Chelsea player and people only remember his goal scoring. Scholes and Gerrard get all the attention because Liverpool and especially united dominate the media, I mean, just look at this panel lol. If Lampard played at united or Liverpool he would be talked about as the best midfielder not just out of these 3 but of all time just with his statistics in goals and assists. They dwarf most all time attacking greats let alone central midfielders. The man has more goals and assists than Ronaldinho in a more difficult league ffs. And his stats are just the tip of the iceberg of what he was as a player. People think he is just goals but everything else he did was overlooked because he wasn’t at a club that gets attention.
Sir Klopp Maybe at tackling and pressing but not his positional sense and intelligence. Plus he made lots of defensive errors in his career so overall defensively it’s Lampard.
Liverpool Legend Yeah but also the reason a lot of people love him. The media is dominated by Liverpool and united. And even most united admit he’s good so he gets the recognition
@@rickclaark8459Gerrard played in CDM for a time at Liverpool meaning of course he would make mistakes. But the fact Gerrard could play in CDM shows you there he was better defensively.
Lampard for me is number 1. He was so consistent. 20 goals a year from midfield. Incredible player. Controlled games also. Then Gerard who was sensational. Then Scholes. Scholes to me is a myth. I watched him his whole career and he never wowed me. He was really good but nah. Xavi and Iniesta on the other hand wowed me everytime I watched them.
@@fionnmaccumhaill1023 😂 l remember Garrard dropping back into the scholes role in the latter stages of his career and was SHITE, if you can't appreciate a player like Xavi, Pirlow or inesta then l can honestly say you don't have a clue about football..
As an American that doesnt know PL history, why not Lampard at number 1? He’s had much success as well as scoring a crazy amount of goals. I don’t see why Gerard is so much better because he played for a worse team. I’ll save my opinion on Scholes cause I never watched him play as much as Gerard and Lampard
Because gerard had a banter team for a fair few years and still kept them relevant because he was that good. Theres a champions league final (european tournament) where he beats one of the greatest teams ever despite being massive underdogs with probably the second best individual performance in a cl final ever. Thats why people rate him so highly despite lampards goals tho personaly i think they are both equal .
We're talking about individual quality, you can't use team success against Gerrard. He played with much worse players than Scholes or Lampard and still managed to compete with them, carried the team on his back and won trophies on his own.
Sir Klopp After doing statistical research, I found that Gerard has more individual awards, but Frank Lampard was able to score more goals and assists, also having more team success overall. Definitely see an argument for Gerard, and the final against AC Milan is impressive, but I personally weigh Franks statistical output and team success over Gerard. I also learned that Gerard was never able to win a premier league title, while Frank Lampard had much success. I feel like that would matter a lot, not winning a domestic title.
Scholes was head & shoulders above both Gerrard & Lampard. Gerrard vs Lampard is a coin toss for the 2nd/3rd place is a coin toss. When they played together in the midfield for England they ran around like headless chickens!
The guy from Liverpool doesn't know what he is talking about really you can't even compare schools and Steven Schools is the best melfider of all time in the championship by miles
@@akshatbetala2813 No I like Scholes. One of the few Alex Ferguson players I don't mind. I actually like Scholes more then Lampard just I love Gerrard more. What made you think I hate Scholes.
@@mrred5417 well I talk to a lot of Liverpool fans and they say the same thing that Scholes should not be compared to Stevie and Lampard. They only go on stats
@@akshatbetala2813 He shouldn't though. He's a completely different midfielder. That's why its normally Gerrard vs Lampard. Comparing Gerrard to Scholes is like comparing Gerrard to Xavi. Two legends of the game two different styles. Its also why a Gerrard Scholes partnership would have been brilliant for England.
Scholes was fire in the euros 04. Scholes was better and that’s why his trophy cabinet speaks volumes over Gerard’s and Lampards. The first time Scholes retired united lost the title that season on goal difference to city.
Henderson is going to surpass Gerrards trophy cabinet so does that make him better than Gerrard? You can’t use team trophies to judge who’s better you have to use individual awards because if not you could say that Dani Alves is better than Messi
The fella said about scholes did he win enough games what a stupid question look at the medals and your get the answer he probably won more than the other 2 put together
Xavi said scoles would walk into any bacelona team zidane said gerrard would walk into any brazil or any intenational team not many players bang on about frank lampard
Harrison that means nothing, like Neville said Scholes was a holding midfielder, not a natural goalscorer, and Gerrard was a CAM but eventually moved into CM and then CDM, whereas Lamps stayed at CAM his whole career
None of them trained as well as lampard. He wasnt as naturally gifted as any of them but topped them both in goals and assists. Stayed fitter for longer periods too. Nobody likes to talk about the hard worker, the talk about the guy more pleasing on the eye.
Let us know your order
1. Lampard
2. Gerrard
3. Scholes
Lampard
Scholes
Steven Gerrard
Scholes,Lampard,Gerrard. All of them were great. Gerrard could strike a ball well and Lampard too. Scholes had the brains
Opposite to Carragher
RajYT so did Lampard tf
Goodness, just imagine if Carragher said Gerrard and Neville said Scholes.
That would be such a shock
I remember when they asked terry aswell🤦🏽♂️
Teey 1 Terry would of ranked their wives first
@@teey1287 And of course Terry picked Lampard, but guess what? Henry picked Scholes
@@AdamT-mv3ok and Ronaldinho & Figo picked Gerrard
@@jamesrichards4294 Xavi and Iniesta idolized Scholes, Zidane himself named him the best Midfielder
Scholes won games scored goals created chances but like Gary said he controlled games and ran the midfield just like xavi. Xavi doesn't have the most goals but he's 1 of the best ever.
Scholes 55 assists in 499 games kinda sad
@@AM-er9oi then you know nothing he did far more than that scored 107 goals but it was his passing that was special, the way he spread the ball and controlled games was incredible he kept the ball and would mostly play deeper pick the ball up and play it back, busquets has played 505 games and has 49 assists with 14 goals and is 1 of the best.
@@robertfranklin4838 0 individual awards for such a great player
@@AM-er9oi He wouldn't have been a united player until retirement If he wasn't great 2 ucl 11 titles 4 fa cup among many more trophies.
@@robertfranklin4838 United would have won all that with or without him
Paul Scholes big games are always forgotten because it was always about United. Not about an individual.
Many of us remember the treble season. FA cup final was known as Sheringham final as he got subbed in early after Keane got injured. Few remember that Scholes scored and assisted in both the goals and controlled the midfield.
Scholes scored against inter Milan away game when United were struggling.
Scholes against Barca, we all remember the goal which won us the semis.
Apart from controlling games, he notched up important goals as well. It's a ridiculous argument that Scholes didn't turn up for important games
Marketing bro, Lampard and Gerard as they were the face of their teams they got more views and marketing, but for me Scholes was the better midfielder 🤷🏻♂️.
None of that compares to Gerrards goals in Istanbul or the facup final especially the Istanbul header that kick starts the greatest comeback in ucl history
this is why England last won the world cup in 1966......media picks the national team based on marketability.
This is by far the best sky sports channel
Sky Sports Cricket isn't bad
Sibaditya Pal
You’re right, it isn’t bad - it’s terrible.
@@yesno9834 lol
@@yesno9834 🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@yesno9834 😂😂😂
Such an entertaining duo to watch. The way they talk and bond with each other. The jokes and more stuff. Brilliant!
One of the best punditry duos by far
But it looked more like beef back then lol 😂
Yeah that's what real man does
I remember reading somewhere .. "it doesn't matter if Paul Scholes isn't your favorite player ... because he is the favourite player of your favorite player!" ... outside English football i.e. ... 😂😂 Pirlo: Paul Scholes is the best ever others are just pretenders lol
Even Zidane says stevies the best
@@tomparry12 “There is no doubt for me that Paul Scholes is still in a class of his own. He’s almost untouchable in what he does. I never tire of watching him play. You rarely come across the complete footballer, but Scholes is as close to it as you can get. One of my regrets is that the opportunity to play alongside him never presented itself during my career.” - Zinedine Zidane
Avi Sen “Is je the best in the world? He might not get the attention of Messi or Ronaldo but yes, I think he just might be!”- Zidane on Gerrard... He also wanted him to come to real to partner him in midfield but gerrard said no to him and Perez
Iniesta's son is named Paolo after Scholes
SAF said that Gerrard 'is the most influential player in England bar none' during Scholes' prime also called him the only true heir to Keane and said " for me Gerrard is Keane"
I would say Scholes is the worst manager out of the 3 though.
TheMetalMouse alright scholesey calm down
Gerrard is hopeless mate I'm surprised he's got players left he flings them all under the bus
@@k.astewart7213 still better at managing than Scholes, couldn't last a year at Oldham
It is What it is - Rangers are not shit how dare you
@It is What it is nah that is lampard
Scholes was ridiculous. He made the most delicate touch to a long splitting ball look so easy... one that sticks with me.. the little touch he makes before Ronald is header goal in the CLF is simple, delicious and perfect. For that can watch it over and over and over....... and the fact that he’s so humble is testament to his character. Legend
He would literally touch the ball down like any professional footballer and people would wank all over it. Gerrards clear, he did it with a bunch of cabbages as his teammates
Depends what you want from the midfield player.
To control a match: Scholes
To score goals from midfield: Lampard
To grab his team by the scruff of its neck: Gerrard
IgotPMT 'grabbing your team by the scruff of its neck' is just generic nonsense. What did Gerrard actually excel at better than Scholes and Lampard ?
To do all of them: KDB
Jamie Monks more personal achievements than both of them combined , 2nd most goals and wasn’t put in a already world class team, while Liverpool was a team being built from the ground up on a relatively low budget and finishing 8th most seasons to success , Gerrard had more of an impact than the other two and was the more talented footballer
@@eatthebiscuits389 Work rates, pace. Plus ridiculous long shooting ability better than Lampard even.
@@eatthebiscuits389 it is nonsense lol
I can understand the argument for all 3 to be fair Gerrard is probably the most complete midfielder, Lampards timing was the best I’ve ever seen from a cm but scholes for me was the best he was an absolute genius you could put a bag over his head and he would still find an amazing pass that cuts open the defence the man was the best!
Ok. If he was so good at passing, how many assists did he have? Look at Lampard numbers. If you also take into account the goals then it's not even a discussion. Lampard miles ahead of both.
Scholes. The consistency of the man was unparalleled. Gerrard for carrying a bunch of donkeys for, 90% of his career and Lampard for the sheer number of goals he'd get from midfield.
Yup
Gerrard didnt get the best teammates
@@Anyonymus123 I'm a United fan but that's exactly why I'll put Gerrard top
@@prosperchidexogbodo5386 Wouldn't agree 100%, he did play with some of the world best at their peak. Owen, Xabi, Masch, Torres, Suarez, Cou. But yea, the rest of the team are usually trash
Still Scholes for the win tho
@@musclecat7910 All of them left in their prime
I never understood why people use Gerrard's "poor" teammates as a positive. When he played for England,he was actually worse,KO-ing England from multiple tournaments.
No one says Scholes had to play with Heinze or Howard,Kieran Richardson or Luke Chadwick,Djemba Djemba,Bebe Cleverly,Foster,Welbeck
Gerrard and Lampard were world class,from 05-10,in their best position only,at CAM
They were massively exposed as CM's in international tournaments,neither had the discipline,or game management to control midfield,even against Algeria or the U.S
They were pool players,running around the table,potting balls as fast as possible,perfect for the Premiership.
Scholes was world class,from 95-13,in four different positions.
Even as a Irishman,to my dying day I will always rue the fact that England never played Scholes and Carrick as their two CM's
They knew their games inside out,have huge big game experience,a winning mentality,and Fergie in their head when things got tough.
They were snooker players,patiently weighing up the options,conserving energy,knowing where the next shot will go.
What about Robbie Savage?
Gutted Savage isn't around now to play with Bale, Wales would be World champions.
Don't diss robbie. Man's a legend. Obviously not a world class pl player but he's a great guy
Shit
ffs,Henderson
Somewhere, Redders cries into his sofa cushions reading this.
Scholes didn't score enough goals? What's this logic? More than 100 goals and that winner against Barcelona.
Jaime going on about big game goals. Paul Scholes scored that wonder goal against Peps Barclona to take Man Utd into Champions league final. He also scored in a Fa Cup final to help Manchester United win the treble. He also came out of retirement and helped Fergie win his final title at the age of 38. Scholes and Gerrard were done by their early to mid thirties.
Rijkaard's Barca
That wasn’t pep
Xavi said scholes was the best he ever seen that guy was a genius among peasants
Scholes was never in PFA team of the year and only won player of the month twice 😂 end of the argument.
@@williamlillicrapp7601 that doesn't mean anything
@@williamlillicrapp7601 stats and awards mean jack shit when talking about scholes he wasn't that sort of player he controlled the game and made football look easy.
I wouldn't say he played with peasants
Alex Nicol so Scholes was a good player but never considered the best in his team. Neither by his teammates nor fellow professionals
Scoring goals isn’t the top priority of a midfield player. Scholes controlled the game and you could pass him the ball confidently knowing he will never play a bad pass and do something special if ever an opportunity arrises. The consistency he did this with was unparalleled to me which is why Scholes is the best out of the bunch in my opinion.
Paul Scholes was without question the greatest Midfielder England had for the Last 25 Years!
Easily in the Top 5 Midfielders in the World!
But I have respect for both Gerrard & Lampard as well!
Could you Imagine if Scholes, Gerrard & Lampard were in a 3 Man Midfield for England during Euro 2004 & World Cup 2006?
Possible Team (2004-2006)
4-1-2-3: Robinson, Neville, Ferdinand, Terry, A.Cole, Scholes, Gerrard, Lampard, Walcott, Crouch, Rooney
Subs: James, Carragher, Bridge, Carrick, Beckham, J.Cole, Owen
Mentions: Campbell, Brown, Hargreaves, S.Wright-Phillps, Heskey
Jamie carragher ??
Wtf he gonna do ?
Scholes was that good people seem to forget how good he actually was. Hugely underrated IMO and doesn’t get talked about enough!
He’s overrated united fans make him out to be zidane
@@haroldinhoo1655 We really dont. The guy doesnt get enough credit
Haroldinho he was “debatably” better
RajYT yeah maybe but he’s not as good as Gerrard or lampard
He gets talked about plenty fucking enough
Scholes scored the winner in the FA Cup final, and a banger in the semi final against Barcelona, and won 11 premier league titles, 11 more than Slippy G
Scholes all day. He’s the Ultimate. All 3 are insanely good. Gerard carried that middle of the road team for years. Lampard scored 20 goals 10 TIMES! On fantastic squads! If anything, people don’t give Lampard enough credit. They usually banter on about about Scholes and Gerard
I'm a Chelsea fan, but Scholes hands down. Any player that can dictate the tempo of the other 19 outfield players on the pitch is a genius. Obviously the other 2 were brilliant players though in their own right.
I have immense respect for this comment considering that it came from a chelsea fan
@@faazilvally626 he is not a Chelsea fan
@@wisdomenake242 yup
@@wisdomenake242 as a Liverpool fan I can say he’s not Chelsea fan too
You're as a Chelsea fan as I am a Man Utd fan. And I'm a Chelsea fan
Part of the reason why people dislike Liverpool fans even when they were not a threat for 30 odd years is that most Liverpool kept re-iterating that their players were the best in the world. Like an illogical broken record.. year after year.. it was so annoying..
When Xavi, Zidane the best players in that position say Scholes was the best.... do you think the opinion of a liverpool defender is important?
I really don't think Liverpool fans or Jamie Carragher have said that for the last 30 years with the exception of Gerard. Many Liverpool fans concede that man united had a better players when they were winning all the trophies years ago. What do you even on about?
Neville is 100% right for me. Scholes was something different. He controlled the game, pulled the strings and had a wonderful technique.
You can rank Gerard and Lampard where Gerard is always nr 1 engine and leader in the midfield.
@@tomparry12 even when Gerrard had a good team he could not do it
Akshat Betala wha u on about we had a good team in Istanbul an he carried the 2nd half especially at the start
@@tomparry12 They are all different - but in my opinion Scholes tops the list.
Scholes was without a doubt the most technical out of the three. Good technique is what I believe is the most important attribute a midfielder must have. When you think of the great midfielders of the past - xavi, Iniesta, yaya toure, viera, zidane, KDB etc.. (I know there are more but you get my point) all these players were technically brilliant.
although lampard and Gerrard were good they weren’t the most technical of footballers - they were the typical English player who worked hard, did the basics well & had a mean - accurate long ball.
Gerard was hard working, a true leader. He was brilliant defensively - could have been a defender easily, had a great shot, and read the game well. His presence and aura on and off the field was essential to his team.
lampard was a revolution in that he made goal scoring from midfield fashionable. His positional awareness was second to none, it’s no accident that he always seemed to be at the right place at the right time. Like Thomas muller he read the game in the final third so well that he Kept getting into positions that would allow him to either create chances or score.
having said this Gerrard and Lampard didn’t have the technical ability to be true string pulling midfielders that most great midfielders tend to be. Gerard had alonso & guys like cotinho to do this and lampard had ballack & deco etc..
with scholes he was the man - pulled the strings and had the technique to create something from nothing - in the tightest spaces. Be it by dribbling or finding a pass in the most unlikely of circumstances - he had it all.
a big reason why England failed - (among others) was the lack of technical players. Although in 2006 England had a great squad their best players didn’t have the technical players around them (as they did at their clubs) to truly flourish.
players like scholes were actually very un English. Which is all the more impressive considering he still managed to make it up the ranks and become a true PL great!

@@tomparry12 all I am saying that Scholes was more technical and he was more suited for European football. He was better than both as he could adapt himself and was more consistent
lemon flappy agree 100 percent with this
Everything Neville said went right over the heads of these two
I thought the same...even tho i'd pick Gerrard-Scholes-Lampard in this order
United fans say scholes
Liverpool fans say Gerrard
Chelsea fans say Lampard
The rest say scholes. Don't believe me, then take a look at Zidane, Iniesta, Xavi etc.
Gary Neville really has developed into a top pundit, massive respect.
It’s kind of amazing isn’t it? 😂 Love Gary!!
Athelstan Edwardson shut up Edward son
Watching this was the most pointless five minutes of my life to date!!!
That's a bold statement. I'm sure you've got plenty to choose from
@@harvey_t presumably your suggesting my life is boring old bean! Well yours equally so, oh the irony! Have a good day, ah that gave me a laugh, thankyou!
You're spot on pal: just how I like it. Have a belter
Then u had a good life so far... for me it was just a casual waste of time.
Sky, I’m glad you’re now putting the date of the clip in the description! Was frustrating not knowing when it was from 😅
“Sky sports retro”
Charles Entertainment Cheese
Sky Sports Retro is a RUclips channel owned by Sky - Im struggling to see your point in trying to correct me?
Trixxy Kicks doesn’t matter
Charles Entertainment Cheese
I know it doesn’t, you’ve tried to be pedantic about it ✌🏻😎
Trixxy Kicks nah, I misread what you put mate to be honest so didn’t think there was any point continuing with my point.
The only correct answer to this is: 1. Scholes 2. Keane 3. Carrick 😂👍🏻
Scholes: "I could pass a ball"
Lampard: "I could strike a ball"
Gerrard: "I could do everything"
Bar win a league title 😂
Scholes for the comparison and Neville for the debate.
I’ve always wondered why they were never played as a 3 in midfield for England? They would dominate games in the middle of the park and create / score so many goals
Then no Beckham, and Sven was never going to drop him
@@thomasbennett712 they could have played a 451
No idea what they were smoking playing scholes pn the wing . Clowns really
People always do this. Say well Gerrard and Lampard could have worked with...
One of them needed to be dropped.
That's because Beckham couldn't play as a lone winger and Rooney couldn't play as a lone striker. I guess that must be the reason.
If only Liverpool had beaten Swansea.
Scholes was one of the most important engines in since he came through the youth in Fergie’s team until he retired, the amount of leagues won puts him a cut above the rest, yes he was surrounded by quality but he still shone as absolutely unbelievable, Gerrard was a close second and Lampard 3rd
3.25 from this moment Gary goes on rampage and each and every thing he said is 101%true .
I remember Andreas Iniesta said once that when he was at la Masia the most frequent name they herd of any player or midfielder was only Paul scholes.
And when xavi was asked about who is the best midfielder he had ever faced without any hesitation he said Paul scholes,after ucl 2011 final which Barcelona won xavi goes to scholes to ask for his shirt.
Once Pirlo said that his biggest regret was that he never had played with Paul scholes
4.01 he is very very annoying done nothing in English squad and dude has noly player 38games for England from 1999-2010 and missed a penalty.
1. Scholes, 2. Lampard, 3. Gerrard. In 2004 Eriksen got it wrong. He should have kept Scholes in the middle in the 'regista' role (which he had already proved he could do at elite level) and played Gerrard on the left (not his position but he was good enough to have done a job there). Scholes was the best English player ever in that deeper central role: long passing, resisting pressure and laying off the ball, controlling tempo and volleying, shooting from outside the box. Ok, Xavi and Pirlo were probably even better at some of these, but Scholes was a composed finisher in front of goal too! Headers, chipping the keeper, side foots in the corner. He started as a striker and it never left him. I would say these 3 were the best ever England midfielders of any era along with Paul Gascoigne and Bobby Charlton.
Iniesta : " Without doubt, my biggest regret in Football is not playing with Paul Scholes. One day, at La Masia, Frank Rijkaard walked in and said, "Today, we don't train, we are going to watch a DVD." We sat for 3 hours watching Paul Scholes highlights. It was the best day of my life. Me, Xavi, Ronaldinho and a young Lionel Messi, in awe of him. It was then that i decided my first born would be called Paul. He's 5 now, and every time i look at him he reminds me of that day at la Masia."
- settles it
You do know that this quote is fake😂
I thought it’s supposedly his daughter named after scholes, yknow paula 😂
I don't think Lampards number of assists gets the credit it deserves, stayed at the highest level for a number of years, finished second to Ronaldinho for the ballon do'r and once the most valuable player. Gerrards made countless errors in big games, back pass against France which led to a 2-1 loss, the own goal against chelsea in a cup final, the infamous slip and the back pass to Drogba in a 2-0 loss in 2010. Scholes is simply unique, controls the pace of the game something only a few players of that calibre can do, Alonso, Xavi, Iniesta and Pirlo.
Explains Gerrard's UCL
Alonso,xavi,iniesta and pirlo are margins ahead of scholes. SAF tried to replace him with Veron and that says alot. He was a great player don't get me wrong, but he's never won Toty, player of the season for man utd either, he wasn't even the best midfielder because man United's playmaking came from the wings. Gerrard and lampard were serial contenders for ballondors. Gerrard being in the Toty 8 time. Lampard and Gerrard are astronomically higher in the podiums compared to scholes in every category. Please stop this.
When Gary Neville was calm and composed like this Jamie really had no chance. This is how Gary should be.
‘Paul Scholes scores goals’ has a great ring to it no matter what accent,
Lampard top five in both assists and goals in prem history am I a joke to you
It was his chant if you didn't know
All great players that would walk into the starting 11 of their respective teams today. As a LFC fan I would love to see Gerrard in todays team.
This is not even a debate .
Paul Scholes was Jesus
Love this retro sky sports channel so entertaining. I mean just seeing 4oy keane's actions even without. Speaking makes me chuckle
Carragher never lets Neville finish. He's always wanting to prove him wrong which tells me his ground shaky to begin with 'Gerrard clutches the big games' I remember him clutching us the title when he slipped and let Demba Ba through, thanks Stevie. No bias from Carra either with Stevie being a Liverpool player an all that.
The perfect point of this argument Carragher always trying to interrupt, trying to stop Neville getting his point across
I just love the wisdom and maturity of Gary Neville. Such a well spoken lad.
They all are great players!
But if Carra puts it like "In terms of goals scored" then why not see" how many titles one"
So Scholars won more titles than Gerard and Lampard together.
Unbiased Arsenal fan, the way I see it they're all different types of CMs. All very equally gifted, if the top 6 were all given the chance to have one of those at their best they would pick different players based on what they lacked, that's how even they all were.
Liverpool would take Gerrard, hes the most energetic Klopp style player.
City would take Scholes, very Guardiola player, him and De Bruyne would just dictate the game.
United not really sure, with Fernandes and Pogba there if a third one would work, so maybe a direct swap with Pogba for Scholes or maybe Gerrard who would be better for getting more goals.
Spurs no clue really maybe Scholes to try and control the game a bit more.
Chelsea probably Lampard as they lack goals from midfield, maybe Gerrard as has more energy, no need for Scholes particularly.
Arsenal I would almost certainly take Lampard for the goals alone, were struggling to find many goals at the moment and he would be essential for that.
Imagine they played in same team
Oh! they played?
And what was it?
- A disaster
They couldn't get on with eachother
Henry put this whole debate to bed anyway when he said Scholes
Henry was a BEAST and part of an unreal Arsenal side they were only afraid of Scholes
That says it all really I think
Pro players opinions are everything
1. Scholes. 2 Gerrard. 3 Lampard. As far as England goes, Gerrard and Lampard never really worked well together in midfield but if England had played a 3 in midfield with Scholes sitting and Lampard and Gerrard ahead of him I think that would have been a formidable midfield.
1)Scholes
2)Gerrard
3)Lampard
Controlling the game is the hardest part of a midfielders game, I'm a United fan but Stevie G comes closely behind Scholes
All three different types of players. This pains me to say but Scholes was probably better with how SAF used him then Gerrard for me and then Lamps.
But put all of them on their other teams and I don't think any debate would be brought up.
Im a Liverpool fan but have to go with Scholes...
Class!
your not a liverpool fan your a mumbai city fab😂😂🤡
"You'd come home from England trainin', people'd ask you who's the best player? Paul Scholes by a mile." Enough said.
Scholes 100%, footballing genius
LOL
HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAGAHAHA
He never even used to get picked for England😂 he ain’t a game changer like how gerrard was
@@T_Man__ So by ur logic Luiz is good cos he gets picked for Brazil
@@T_Man__ u melon he still played, just out of position cause eriksson was incapable of changing to a three man midfield
As the complete box to box midfielder I don’t know how there is any other answer but Gerrard.
1. Gerrard - The most complete midfielder out of the 3.
Could score like Lampard, could peng a ball like Scholes, could defend better than both, scored screamers for fun, better leadership, Scholes and Lampard had the advantage of better players around them. Gerrard had to carry some really shit players on his back and won trophies on his own.
Sir Klopp Gerrard had a midfield of Mascherano and Alonso and still couldn’t win a prem title. They are uncomparable. Scholes is comparable to Xavi and Iniesta, Gerrard isn’t.
Areesh Kirmani exactly this Thing about gerrard being in bum teams is a myth played alongside some class players
RiiDGE exactly, that team in the mid to late 2000s had Torres, Mascherano, Alonso, Arbeloa, Reina, Carragher, Hyypia, Kuyt and Crouch. All of them were world class or close to it and scousers and media spread the narrative that gerrard played in an average team as if he had to carry them.
Areesh Kirmani was Frank Lampard or Paul Scholes ever called the best in the world by Zidane, or one of the best by Thiery Henry? Let alone Gerrard has won more individual awards, more Ballon D’or nominations than both of them. Gerrard was the better player. If Gerrard left Liverpool for Chelsea, he would have won everything, during the 08/09 season, Gerrard still scored 16 goals with 11 assists, only Torres had more goals.
Alexandre Bray Xavi and Iniesta have stated that Scholes is the best midfielder of the last 25 years. Pele said he was better, CR7 said he was better (biased yes but still), messi said he was better, even arbeloa who was gerrards team mate said scholes was better. Pirlo didn’t get nominated for ballon dors and kante did, does that mean kantes better than pirlo? obviously not.
Scholes
Gerrard
Lampard
Lampards goals are ridiculous for a midfielder, crazy numbers. All 3 world class.
Henderson is better than Paul Scholes
Cafreeez Not good enough to clean Scholes boots pal.
@@cafreeez3316 r u stupid?
@@cafreeez3316 wow what a idiot
@@walterwhite3143 Scholes was sent to the cleaners by Hendo
I am die hard Chelsea but Scholes is a footballer's man he was an absolute genius on the ball and probably the best player to wear an England shirt since gazza
For Christ sake just appreciate them they're all 3 of the best midfeilders of all time
Putting scholes last is embarrassing
Fair play, Caragher is a Muppet
Not as much as tha Tommy bloke tho
In today's game, scholes would be every manager's dream player, he was so underrated because people see the moments not the people who were behind the moment. Scholes was the reason why Manchester United played such an attacking and expansive football, with one diagonal ball he just bypass the whole middle of a team
Didn’t even need to watch that . Just knew what they were going to say .🤷♂️
Carra: Gives a fair assessment with examples of big game influence.
Neville: 'best ive played with......'
If the conversation was who was the best goalscorer, lampard and gerrard are above Scholes, its who was the best player and Paul Scholes is the most naturally gifted midfielder ever in the premier league.
He did give a fair assessment after that but you were too busy writing this asinine comment. Since when did goals become the only barometer for a MIDFIELDER?
@@shrey9699 Carragher did give a fair assesment but he mainly pointed out the goals both Gerrard and Lampard came up with in big games and they both did. Scholes however had everything as a midfielder, every range of pass, could score any type of goal and every game the game was played at his tempo. All 3 were great but Scholes was best in my opinion
@@ciaranmccullough2273 Scholes has more goals from open play than Gerrard
A diamond with hargreaves as the pivot gerrard and scholes im front and lampard furthest forward would have been one of the best midfields of all time.
Good to see a clip of Jaime again after La Liga poached him for punditry.
@Mosaab joke flew right over your head didn't it
@Mosaab 🤣🤣🤣
Mosaab thanks for taking the stick for us
@Mosaab the guy who sent the tweet misspelled Jamie as Jaime which is a Spanish name
Lamps - goals for team #1
Gerrard - influence on team #1
Scholes - control of the game #1
Scholes is number 1 of the three because he won a gazillion more trophies than the others
But that could just mean he had better player's around him which he did ⚽️
Mustafi has more international trophies than messi...
Team trophies don't determine individual talent
@@MikeyJMJ he was the main player
GERRARD!!!
scholes>gerrard>lampard
Scholes, Gerrard Lampard for me. Look at when Man Uniteds dominance started and when it ended, and then check out Scholes career and se how they line up almost perfectly.
He even had to unretire to secure League title nr 20. Man United have been able to replace som descent players over the years, but not even close to replacing Scholes.
Scholes was never in PFA team of the year and only won player of the month twice 😂 end of the argument.
@@williamlillicrapp7601 david silva has got one player of the month in his whole time at City. Suppose hes shit too?
@@williamlillicrapp7601 wait Aguero has never won the golden boot so he is not as good as Drogba
Tell me one reason why Gerrard was better. Look at the stats, the guy didnt even win a prem.
3 of the greatest midfield players ever have all said Paul scholes is the best midfielder. Greatest being (xavi,iniesta,zidane)
Zidane said Gerrard was better than Messi and Ronaldo during his prime. These quotes mean little. Most people saying Scholes aren’t old enough to remember him play and base their opinion on those quotes. Scholes by his own admission saw himself as an attacking midfielder, both Gerrard and Lampard were better than him in that regard. People’s opinion of Scholes has been completely revised since Barca’s tiki taka football lifted the game to new heights. Because Scholes played in that style people equate him to being that good, on reflection he was world class in possession and passing, mediocre to poor in terms of tackling and capable of world class goals although not having a massive return on them. He was a world class player but he was not a God like some of the kids make him out to be.
Gerrard’s passing was on par with Scholes, his shooting ability was arguably better and he had the indefinable quality of leadership and being able to turn games in Liverpool’s favour when they had no right to. A big game player scoring in the Europa league, Champions league, league cup and Fa cup finals. He was wanted by both Chelsea and United at a time when they had Lampard and Scholes respectively. He could play any position to the highest level, a generational talent and one that doesn’t get the respect he deserves.
Gerrard then Scholes then Lampard.
Scholes, Lampard, Gerrard
You can see Neville is actually trying to convey his points factually and Jamie is just trying to find points that suit his opinion.
I believe it's the other way around Neville says he doesn't like to compare players while carragher is explaining his points
Spot on
don’t see how people say gerrard. he’s a passion merchant and carried a dog shit team for 15-20 years so he was made to look good
@@tomlequelenec2784 passion merchant that's a new one
asdsaksa well he is
The Lennon/McCartney of punditry!! You create genuine camaraderie. These two are simply brilliant when paired together. Respect to both of them.x
Veron was bought because ManUtd added strength in depth to their midfield.
ManUtd had just won 3 PL titles in a row when Veron was bought so I don't know what point Carragher was trying to make with that comment.
Both Scholes and Lampard played in great teams. The difference is Gerrard carried his.
Carried them to what exactly? One champions league and a couple of domestic trophies? Lol alright mate
Probably the worst team to have won the Champions league aswell. At the first chance Gerrard had of playing in a decent team he literally slipped
Teey 1 You’re pointing out exactly what I mean without realising.
He won less major trophies than Scholes and Lampard since he choose to be loyal said no 3 times when Mourinho called. If you want to compare individual honours however, the other two doesnt come close to the best ever English midfielder.
Roy Keane Sorry my French but only dumbnuts like you wouldn’t realise it’s far more impressive to carry a weak Liverpool side to a European trophy against AC Milan, than play a small role in an already great Manchester Utd or Chelsea side.
Abowen Small Role for United? For about 12 seasons, literally everything went through him.
Zidane said Paul Scholes was the best player he ever played against, enough for me
Yes, Gerrard and Lampard were world class players. Paul Scholes was a generational talent, a true GOAT.
You think Scholes was the greatest of all time???
Awful opinion
Mark Yardley was by far the best midfielder of this generation. There's a street in Paisley named after him
Lampard was easily the best. Most goals, Most assists, best overall defensively. Also the best in big games and moments which is proven by the stats - everyone says it was Gerrard because he played for Liverpool but it is Lampard if you look at the facts. Lampard is the 4th highest scorer in the quarter, semi and finals of the champions league, above the likes of Rooney and Lewandowski and he has the third highest number of match winning goals in premiership history, only below Shearer and Rooney. He never let Chelsea down with big misses or fouls or mistakes, never missed a big penalty for Chelsea. He controlled matches for Chelsea just as much as Scholes did for United it just gets overlooked because he was a Chelsea player and people only remember his goal scoring.
Scholes and Gerrard get all the attention because Liverpool and especially united dominate the media, I mean, just look at this panel lol. If Lampard played at united or Liverpool he would be talked about as the best midfielder not just out of these 3 but of all time just with his statistics in goals and assists. They dwarf most all time attacking greats let alone central midfielders. The man has more goals and assists than Ronaldinho in a more difficult league ffs. And his stats are just the tip of the iceberg of what he was as a player. People think he is just goals but everything else he did was overlooked because he wasn’t at a club that gets attention.
Gerrard was better defensively than Lampard
Sir Klopp Maybe at tackling and pressing but not his positional sense and intelligence. Plus he made lots of defensive errors in his career so overall defensively it’s Lampard.
@@rickclaark8459 Everyone says Gerrard because he played for Liverpool? What no that's the main reason everyone hates Gerrard.
Liverpool Legend Yeah but also the reason a lot of people love him. The media is dominated by Liverpool and united. And even most united admit he’s good so he gets the recognition
@@rickclaark8459Gerrard played in CDM for a time at Liverpool meaning of course he would make mistakes. But the fact Gerrard could play in CDM shows you there he was better defensively.
Everyone knows it's
1. Scholes
2. Gerrard
3. Lampard
We know lampard is Chelsea's all time top goalscorer.. we know 🙄
Lampard for me is number 1. He was so consistent. 20 goals a year from midfield. Incredible player. Controlled games also.
Then Gerard who was sensational.
Then Scholes.
Scholes to me is a myth.
I watched him his whole career and he never wowed me. He was really good but nah.
Xavi and Iniesta on the other hand wowed me everytime I watched them.
@@fionnmaccumhaill1023 😂 l remember Garrard dropping back into the scholes role in the latter stages of his career and was SHITE, if you can't appreciate a player like Xavi, Pirlow or inesta then l can honestly say you don't have a clue about football..
@@TheREDMANC7 learn how to spell Pirlo.
Re read my comment. I said Xavi and Iniesta were brilliant.
@@fionnmaccumhaill1023
It's the grammar/spelling police 😬.. l can't win this argument.. im out.....
This is not retro but nevertheless I will watch😂
As an American that doesnt know PL history, why not Lampard at number 1? He’s had much success as well as scoring a crazy amount of goals. I don’t see why Gerard is so much better because he played for a worse team. I’ll save my opinion on Scholes cause I never watched him play as much as Gerard and Lampard
Because gerard had a banter team for a fair few years and still kept them relevant because he was that good. Theres a champions league final (european tournament) where he beats one of the greatest teams ever despite being massive underdogs with probably the second best individual performance in a cl final ever. Thats why people rate him so highly despite lampards goals tho personaly i think they are both equal .
We're talking about individual quality, you can't use team success against Gerrard. He played with much worse players than Scholes or Lampard and still managed to compete with them, carried the team on his back and won trophies on his own.
Sir Klopp After doing statistical research, I found that Gerard has more individual awards, but Frank Lampard was able to score more goals and assists, also having more team success overall. Definitely see an argument for Gerard, and the final against AC Milan is impressive, but I personally weigh Franks statistical output and team success over Gerard. I also learned that Gerard was never able to win a premier league title, while Frank Lampard had much success. I feel like that would matter a lot, not winning a domestic title.
Scholes was head & shoulders above both Gerrard & Lampard.
Gerrard vs Lampard is a coin toss for the 2nd/3rd place is a coin toss. When they played together in the midfield for England they ran around like headless chickens!
I have no idea how United fan put Scholes as a candidate against L and G
If love football you know it’s going to be Paul Scholes simple as that.
The guy from Liverpool doesn't know what he is talking about really you can't even compare schools and Steven
Schools is the best melfider of all time in the championship by miles
Scholes top 100%
@Vernon Francis Gallagher No we can say either Gerrard or Lampard because with have opinions you self entitled red mancs.
@@mrred5417 you hate scholes so ofc you will say anything but Paul scholee
@@akshatbetala2813 No I like Scholes. One of the few Alex Ferguson players I don't mind. I actually like Scholes more then Lampard just I love Gerrard more. What made you think I hate Scholes.
@@mrred5417 well I talk to a lot of Liverpool fans and they say the same thing that Scholes should not be compared to Stevie and Lampard. They only go on stats
@@akshatbetala2813 He shouldn't though. He's a completely different midfielder. That's why its normally Gerrard vs Lampard. Comparing Gerrard to Scholes is like comparing Gerrard to Xavi. Two legends of the game two different styles. Its also why a Gerrard Scholes partnership would have been brilliant for England.
Zidane said that Paul Scholes was the best player of his generation. That was a generation that included Zidane himself.
Carra: Then why did Ferguson buy Veron?
Gary: Cause Paul Scholes was poor
It was irony obviously
@C G Very bright mate careful not to blind yourself!
Scholes was fire in the euros 04. Scholes was better and that’s why his trophy cabinet speaks volumes over Gerard’s and Lampards. The first time Scholes retired united lost the title that season on goal difference to city.
Henderson is going to surpass Gerrards trophy cabinet so does that make him better than Gerrard? You can’t use team trophies to judge who’s better you have to use individual awards because if not you could say that Dani Alves is better than Messi
Scholes. Best midfielder ever to grace the premier league
That's a bold statement ⚽️
Not fit to lace de bruynes boots
@@happykillmore77
That's very harsh as Scholes was a quality player
@@dweezil8461
Fact for which question 🤔
@@tomsmith9048 you're talking to kids mate, they've only been watching football for ten years
The fella said about scholes did he win enough games what a stupid question look at the medals and your get the answer he probably won more than the other 2 put together
Gerrard for me ! Played in some shocking sides and held them up on his own for years ..!!!
Cartmans Dad won the Champions League against an AC Milan side which were 10000x better than Liverpool
Scholes is a pure baller, no one like him
Xavi said scoles would walk into any bacelona team zidane said gerrard would walk into any brazil or any intenational team not many players bang on about frank lampard
Yet hes scored more goals than both of them...
Oh yeah, Paul Scholes as a player was streakes ahead of Lampard, Scholes should be getting compared to players like zidane, xavi and pirlo.
Harrison that means nothing, like Neville said Scholes was a holding midfielder, not a natural goalscorer, and Gerrard was a CAM but eventually moved into CM and then CDM, whereas Lamps stayed at CAM his whole career
None of them trained as well as lampard. He wasnt as naturally gifted as any of them but topped them both in goals and assists. Stayed fitter for longer periods too. Nobody likes to talk about the hard worker, the talk about the guy more pleasing on the eye.
@@veerickpatel7634 Scholes played at United under Sir Alex Ferguson there is no question that he trained and worked hard
The legendary scholesie. GNev bringing the facts