Jeep Rubicon 392 Xtreme Recon - Review and 0-60 MPH Launch

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 17 окт 2024

Комментарии • 18

  • @rivaled
    @rivaled Год назад +2

    Definitely a beast , stop making me want to trade my raptor!

  • @GatorOverland
    @GatorOverland Год назад +2

    🤘🏼🤘🏼🤘🏼

  • @BlueLines50
    @BlueLines50 Год назад +2

    Thanks for the ride.
    nice color I never knew Jeeps had a 392. That’s a game changer 👍

  • @clinthopkins1763
    @clinthopkins1763 Год назад +2

    Awesome video. It looks like you filmed this right around the corner from our place. Bring it out to the next cars and coffee!

    • @MotoringAdventures_KE7SAI
      @MotoringAdventures_KE7SAI  Год назад

      I almost went to the one yesterday. Next month we’re out of town but I’ll definitely make it out to one!

  • @zacharymitchellwtx
    @zacharymitchellwtx Год назад +1

    I have XR sting gray. Love the hydro blue 💙..in West Texas. Have fun! Smiles per gallon.

  • @marshallgerston4809
    @marshallgerston4809 3 месяца назад +1

    I told my wife its 4 cars in one! A sports car, a muscle car, a convertible (if you get the Sky Top) AND a Jeep, so look how much money I'm saving by buying just ONE car, LOL.

  • @dcdude81
    @dcdude81 6 месяцев назад +1

    76k holy cow!!!!!

  • @bruce88wayne
    @bruce88wayne Год назад +1

    Note: The 2500 6.4 is not the same as this one. It’s more than just a tune difference.

    • @MotoringAdventures_KE7SAI
      @MotoringAdventures_KE7SAI  Год назад

      I'm curious. What are some of the other differences?

    • @bruce88wayne
      @bruce88wayne Год назад +1

      @@MotoringAdventures_KE7SAI off the top of my head I remember the piston design and cam shaft are different. Piston rod length in the 2500 is actually the same length as the one in the 6.2 Hemi from the Hellcat. There are one or two other differences, but I can’t remember exactly what they are. Maybe something to do with the injectors.

    • @MotoringAdventures_KE7SAI
      @MotoringAdventures_KE7SAI  Год назад

      @@bruce88wayne Makes sense! Sounds like it’s the engine from the Challenger and Chargers rather than the truck engine. I just wonder why they would not put this same engine, with both more horsepower and more torque than the one currently in the 2500s, in the 2500s. Probably longevity? Durability?

    • @bruce88wayne
      @bruce88wayne Год назад +1

      @@MotoringAdventures_KE7SAI that is most likely the case as the truck motor used to be the more durable having a thicker block and different aluminum cast for the cylinder heads, but the performance 6.4 later starting using the same block and heads so now they both have that same durability. Guess Dodge/Stellantis just didn’t want to make the swap after making the upgraded components a standard across the board. Maybe they knew the 392 was coming to an end and didn’t want to put it in the truck only to change it again.