After 3 years of interest in this FE theory, I have come to resonate with it. What a trip. Thank you for your hard work. Falling backward at 1000 MPH watching a sunset. LOL
I remember watching perhaps one of your first investigations regarding the flat earth phenomenon. It was funny and exciting at the same time because you we’re discovering for the first time with you own eyes the reality of something very different from what you had been taught and thought all you life, like the rest of us. Thank you so much for you analysis with your math skills. Appreciate it. God’s blessings on your work. Shalom. I’m pretty good with a tape measure, but your skills are off the charts!
@@CNCmachiningisfun Crooked minds can't see straight! The best minds in medicine killed Washington because they thought he just had bad blood. They took a little then a little more until he died. All he had was a cold! Cosmology is a religion because you have to have faith to believe it! Do you believe they flew to Mars and launched a copter in a 1% atmosphere? O by the way the Bible has been proven over and again about kings and lands yet science updates over and over! The journal Science printed the universe may be in the shape of a Croissant! They are laughing at you! If you can look at a Bible without garlic around your neck read Matthew 24. It is about our Earth and people TODAY!
@@jondularswoods6461 Your contempt for science, and reality, is really sad. Hopefully, you'll *GROW UP., AND GET A LIFE.* Yeah, like THAT'S gonna happen. *DOPEY* theists, and their kiddie fiddling gods!
[edit: watch the 3D clip on a computer monitor, not a large TV, the spacing between red and blue is too wide and you won't perceive 3D] my spell checker failed , intro slide typo "Photogrametry" not Phtogrametry" grrrrrrr, let me know if you see any other typos, or errors. Maybe I'll upload a corrected one later. 23:25, if you noticed I adjusted the radius of the earth to 50 000 mi to try and curve fit the observed data, and the green line came up, (eventually, my computer was running slow and the update took a while) but even that value is not enough, the observed radius of curvature is more like 100 000 miles, but that's just because I did not fine tune the slope just perfectly, otherwise it would be INFINITE ! Just Incredible!
Thankful to our wonderful Creator for your big mind and gentle spirt. May He continue to bless and keep you and your family on this incredible flat earth. Thanks Jay
Thank you so much for all your work, and your effort in creating these videos! I absolutely love watching them, they're JUST INCREDIBLE! Very, VERY interesting stuff!
So flat, I fly a lot. 3 or 4 times per week. Lately I've been taking my p900 with me. But I haven't yet purchased the filters. I get so much interest from other passengers . Seems to me that more people are interested in the shape of the plane we live on. Than ball previously proposed. I think within a few years. Our society is going to change its mind. Thanks for sharing.
So I just bought a P1000 with the full spectrum IR conversion from Kolari and all the filters. I also purchased a genie 3 axis and I am going to 3d print a mount that I can suction cup to the window.
Been waiting for this one. Thanks so much for Sharing it! The Truth sets us Free! The more our eyes see, The more beautiful this creation is. Still in awe of THE Creator, Our Heavenly Father and The Word stands True, " it's immeasurable!! " Sure what we all believed was the truth, was a big deal to thoses who believed in a creator, But This::EARTH,: Is month dropping everyday. Waiting on your 2 greater lights to rule the day and night video!! Thanks for giving us something to share with others. ❤ been a fan since your very 1st video. God Bless
Best flat smacking words ever spoken on YT takes place at 30:06 to 30:18 "It's a matter of truth folks. One simple principle that we get wrong and then we build a mountain of theoretical data on a crummy foundation" God bless sir JT
I recognize all those places. Lived in Vermillion SD and Sioux City IA. Had friends in Fargo! Saw Cherokee IA on the map. Had friends there too. It's pretty damn flat out there!! Excellent work.
And you're here to watch and talk? Man you already have robots doing the art for you . Do you also milk your own oil and run away with nothing worth while to say after wasting your life watching liars lying to supposed idiots hahaha what does that make you 🤣
This is the channel I tell everyone to watch for the evidence of flat earth. The infrared filter is amazing Thank you very much for all the work you do, your detailed analysis is undeniably.
@@Hello_Poetry- they first need to have a distrust in NASA before they will open there eyes, you have to start with the moon landing. And the rest will follow. This is “American moon” these are ball earthers proving the Apollo hoax, ruclips.net/video/KpuKu3F0BvY/видео.html this is the best thing to start with.
Flattastic analysis. Practical reality. It has been a simply incredible asset to have your perspective. May the Creator continue to bless and keep you and yours.
Infra Researcher JT made his best video up to now with this, imo. Specifically the 2 degree thing is even nearly a no-brainer and the overall presentation is very well done.... INCREDIBLE!
@@kanemclaren5991 Ships disappearing below the horizon. Sunrises and sunsets. These, alone, are proof that the earth is NOT flat. So, can you *PROVE* that the earth is flat? *NOPE!*
Imagine a device more powerful/advanced than a infrared camera ? We would see notably further. There's no curve upon the surface of this Earth. And our visual limitations aren't restricted by a "physical" curve. How about angular res, convergence, compression, dense air elements, haze, weather elements, water vapors, perspective, etc. Notice how the horizon is extended based on the strength of the optic. Eyes, telescopes, altitude, infrared. And the horizon looks the same, as it's flat/level.
yes, best is Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), I've worked with that and processed data, we can get stunning long range images of the ground miles and miles away. upcoming video will deal with that, I'm holding back for the right moment. :)
@@jtolanmedia1 Yes, and I got to believe the military (air force, navy) and maybe the army, have some advanced cameras/telescopes that can cut through the haze/dense air elements. But of course that tech. will not be available to the general public. If infrared cameras are available to the average person. Then what type of zoom devices, that will allow the military to observe significantly further than a infrared ?? You got to believe they have them already.
@@BeyondInfinitePlains I'm personally excited about Sony coming out with a modified InGaAs sensor that works up to 1.7 um wavelength, that's the SWIR band, where we can still use glass instead of Gallium lenses as MWIR and LWIR. I tried to get my hands on these IR technology but they are ITAR controlled and targeted towards military and law enforcement, but the Sony sensor might just make it to the consumer.
Globe gets rid of a lot of questions , for myself , i dont know , until someone can show me a photo from space that hasnt come from a computer, , nobody does . One thing is for sure , our world and existence is far more strange than we can imagine !
I saw Jackal in concert many yrs ago if you are familiar they had one song using the sound of a chainsaw think it was called lumberjack ?Been decades ✌
10:02 transition in presentation from straight in center of barrel to horizon in center of view. Were you able to position your instrument's focal center level with the barrel center before any slight tilting to record angles? I didn't hear it stated but I'm assuming that you did in fact center both. (I'm also assuming that your barrel distortion is the streamlined airliner glass) It may have needed some bodily contortion within the seating area to achieve this precision. Anyway, excellent video thank you! Cheers!
Best described as a realm I suppose ... another great video bud, I look forward to each video you put out .. Just curious if you have done night flights with long range infrared and how do they look? Thanks again for all your time and shared curiosity.
The very word "gravity" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to gravity believing societies, to heliocentric oaths and to astrophysical proceedings...TY JTolan Media1
J Tolund most appreciate all your videos just more intel for the decived souls that believe the evil spin, Thank you for your time because it matters !!!
Yeah welcome back JT!! Absolutely stunning and fascinating views of the Flat Earth mid-west USA!! I use your videos in the 24 hour Flat Earth Discord whenever I'm debating or introducing the FLAT EARTH TRUTH to Heliocentrists and beginners!! So thanks for all your hard work and keep em coming!!👏👏👏👏👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾
Good question: No curve seen from an air 'plane' A) Fuselage is curved, designed for aerodynamics, means windows have to be curved to fit B) Cabin is pressurized pushing outwards on windows causing slight buldge out. C) People tend to see what they 'expect' want or programmed to see. D) Globe math, not possible to see a curve even at 100,000ft. E) horizon doesn't drop with altitude as necessary for a sphere. F) people say curve is from left to right, never away and down as globe G) Both sides of the plane and pilot would claim to see curve the same, (left to right) they all couldn't connect to make a ball Yes, I've flown a few times and gave it plenty of thought and research.
SO glad to see you back! I know I'm not the only one who was genuinely starting to get concerned about you! And justifiably so. Your work is some of THE most compelling evidence(proof, actually!) of FE! Potentially paradigm shifting! And TPTB abhor truth and its prognosticators. So, please keep us updated more often! Cheers!
If you use the same math on the stars and the moon you will prove that they are all the SAME distance away from the lens proving they are a projection on the firmament.
Yes, I thought about that a few years ago and was going to buy a focuser with a micrometer for my telescopes, then as we focus on a mountain top antenna, at a know distance from the telescope, then focus on the stars or moon, we can get the difference the micrometer changed and we can calculate the optical/geometric distance with the focus equation for a lens. But that difference is quite small, so I decided to do even better and buy two cameras and space them apart at large distances but aligned to get an even longer baseline much like the large array telescope. stay tuned -JT
@@jtolanmedia1 thank you. You could also use this to determine the distance the moon is from the earth and stars too as we know in reality the are not so far away. I look forward to you taking the time to do I am sure another great analysis.
It's about time! Haven't seen your vids in a while!!! I deleted my FB so I'm glad your still on youtube! I've been hearing a lot about Gab and I'm on telegram too if your there talk to you later man going to watch this video now!👍
Infrared may bend the least, but it still bends, otherwise it could not be focused by lenses and your infra red photography wouldn't work at all. Furthermore, you're comparing boundary refraction where the light suddenly refracts at a crisp boundary between two densities. Atmospheric refraction is GRADIENT refraction, where there is no boundary, and that may not split up the colors so much. In fact it may not split them up hardly at all, otherwise stars would separate into a rainbow line near the horizon because remember, a star appears to slow down setting as it nears the horizon, because things are refracted to appear HIGHER than they are, not lower.
I was wondering if you knew anything about radar waves? I've used them in my younger years and since FE came along it dawned on me that I used to pick land up 75 miles offshore. The radar was appx. 15 ft above sea level. That means that radar waves are bending over the horizon which I don't believe is possible. That would almost equate to a bullet curving around a mountain. Or something like that 😅
Good to hear you again, thought they may have got to you. There was a Boeing 777 flight from Hong Kong to Madrid last week that had to land due to another engine failure. It landed at Moscow! If you draw a line from Hong Kong to Madrid on a flat earth it makes sense but not on a globe. 🤔
@@michaeltaylors2456 Ok is It Really Necessary to Call us Idiots ? Yes You Can Believe a 2500 Year old Theory And i Have Sometimes Called Many Flat Earthers Morons But Only for the Laugh and You're Going all-on Serious Jesus Christ...
Nice Proof But There is An Explanation: Planes Don't Go In A Straight Line And This Plane Was Going Close Enough to Moscow For it to Land in There Because in a Round Earth Map the Plane DID GO ABOVE RUSSIA
@@_rakshas_ Quite right, the definition of idiot is an individual with less than room temperature IQ. I would argue that it is when one denies what is so plain and obvious. Ballers, being in love with being fooled with jargon, and taking leaps of faith, preferring fantastical stories and images to that of reality, may require a different term, delusional ?
Amazing. We need footage facing the northpole, the magnetic mountain and rest of what they are hidding there. I wish I had the money to explore. I wonder how quickly one gets shot down if one actually went there in, let's say, a Jetstream without seeking permission.
I want to see some satellite out in space that could get the whole picture of the globe which they haven't in real time since they have all this awesome videos they could send back from Mars and I want to see the globe with airplanes flying upside down on the bottom of the ball that's what I want to see
Fantastic work JT. Great to see you back. If you are not aware of the recent experiments by "Sky Free" you should checkout their channel. Their results show that Refraction close to the ground is upward.
Centripetal Force (aka. String Tension to hold an ball, in a ball string model) cannot be equated to gravitational pull. If the surface speed rotation of earth is around 1,000 miles per hour with a 40,075 km radius, the outward force will flung even the dust outward the atmosphere. Earth is not consist of "magnets" as most of matter do not exhibit electromagnetic properties, earth is not made up of sticky objects and lastly most of objects on earth do not have strings or anchored to something. This is why centripetal force do not exist in a free (unstringed) body. Centrifugal force is the only approved rotational force. This force can exhibit to micro to macro level where most of the mechanical equipments is designed (EG: Centrifugal Pump, Centrifugal Blower, (Centrifugal) Hydrocyclones, (Centrifugal) Cyclone Separator). Centripetal Equipments you will see is inefficient and works like a centrifugal equipments but the only different is that the fluid is the moving (this is not similar with the theoretical centripetal force and it is more like of "scooping-up" of fluids) I am a licensed engineer in profession. I can say the "Gravity BeLIEvers" is more likely a religion rather than a Scientific Movement. They refute the idea of "non-existence of gravity" because of an existing equation but cannot be proved true. If there is a gravity, why helium ballons goes up and similar weight ballons with atmospheric air goes down. This cannot be defended using any gravitational equation. You can slap multiple equations but will end up with lots of error or correction factor, also when the object reach terminal velocities the equation will be ridiculously long and seemingly absurd (trying to fit on what you believe is hard especially you works agains what was observed naturally, which highly points out that the belief cannot exist in natural realm). If you ask why gravitational accelation is constant? This equation is derived from earth's mass (who the hell weighs the earth), diameter/radius (ok tell me what measuring equipment they use for this) and a gravitational constant G (wut? It is derived from planck length, mass and time... it seemingly coming from the previous assumption, isn't it which is circular - using an similar assumptions to prove a similar assumptions is definitely wrong even in scientific aspect) I can tell you simply that a gravitational constant is a "constant" and will just bloat or reduce the number in similar magnitude. If the whole world decides to change its number or eliminate it (changing to a value of "1") the force equations will remain the same. The calculations of forces will just correct itself. The power and forces (anything with gravitational acceleration) will have just a different number but hey, you can relate or express the forces with "g" and without "g". And finally the movement or particles up and down is highly due to the difference in density (oil and water, etc.). Why the ground soil is floating on water? It can easily answered by when water is pressurized, it can arranged it molecules to relieve the stress and its density is now greater than the rocks/soil below the ground. This will also answer the the helium balloon goes up and the balloon with atmospheric air goes down. Similarly why carbon nanotubes defy gravity (floats) and all material less dense (lower density) than air will float. Also, Terminal velocity can be justified by the density difference (fix) between material. Therefore, falling is not because of gravity, it is because of difference in density. The plane fly because of lift, where air is compressed above the wings which the resulting density of compressed air is higher than the equivalent density of the plane. Note that accelaration (gravity) is more like of the time to have the movement in equilibrium due to difference in density.
Very interesting comment. Here is something for you to consider :) - When an disc rotates there is an internal stress generated "hoop stress". - All of the mass in the object is constrained to move in a circular path by the molecular bonds of the material making up a disc. - That amounts to the 2D cross sectional surface of the outer rim of the disc being able to withstand the total centrifugal force generated by the mass of the rim. - An analogy would be pulling a rope from both ends . The total force is exerted on EVERY point along the rope . A long rope is the same 'strength" as a short rope because the breaking point is determined only by the 2D cross section (at the weakest point). - So if we simply take a slice of the earth at the equator and rotate it at 15 degrees/hour ( which is 1040 mph at the equator ) - We find that EVEN if the earth was made of solid titanium it would not be able to withstand the "hoop stress" - It is even more ridiculous if we consider . Fault lines, volcanoes, liquid core (i.e. no tensile strength) , surface covered with sand , water etc ... Based on formula from "Materials Selection in Mechanical Design - Ashby 4th edition". #include #include # define M_PI 3.14159265358979323846 /* pi */ using namespace std; int main() { // Titanium. double density = 4500.0; // kg/m3 double tensile_strength = 940e6; // mpascals double v = 0.32; // poissons ratio
@@decadent. True.. "Ball Model" will work only on the assumption that the mass stick together behaves as "One solid matter", when in reality it do not. If you consider that dust, rock, water, trees, air can stick together. Intermolecular and intramolecular attraction has limits and attraction between non-magnetic molecules cannot justify how this things stick together on a rotating ball model. It is not similar with an inflated ball, where the (hydrogen) bonds between sets of polymers will allow the ball to keep a spherical form without disintegrating in single polymers. Do you think your tree and the ground have that attraction? You can calculate how much outward force (centripetal) is exerted due to radius of earth to the tree using your shared equation, now calculate the acceleration upwards... now assume the "Age of the Earth" and calculate what is the projected object velocity today.. you can now say.. "the earth will not exist based on that assumption".
Great read lots of good information being shared here. Perhaps you all can explain to me how the ball-Earth model stays in balance while rotating in the void of space because I can not picture how that model can maintain balance? Unless of course, someone is out there sticking giant wheel magnetic on the ball and we don't know it.
@@clevebarnes6620 Theoretically, Ball-Earth Model can stay in balance (circular shape) given that the attraction between individual object is balanced or in equilibrium. This can be similarly observed in a molecular level (atomic cloud) where electrons moves in a circular manner or ball shape (s-orbital), a slight imbalance or excess will end up a dumbell (single or multiple) and a donut shape. We know that electrons spins rapidly and moves at great speed this is why it is a good model. For earth shape using an electron model, it will high-likely to have a donut/dumbell shape rather than a ball shape given the assumption that the earth itself is magnetic and spinning.
spell checker failed , intro slide typo "Photogrametry" not Phtogrametry" grrrrrrr, let me know if you see any other typos, or errors. Maybe I'll upload a corrected one later. 23:25, if you noticed I adjusted the radius of
I cannot get enough of your beautiful images of flat Earth.Thanks. Amaizing truth revealed like it is , no spells no wizardy no manipulative cheep propaganda. The reality beet the lie everytime. One need to send love to engineers.
Did you detect 0% curvature? If the Earth were spherical, what minimum maturity would it have to have in order not to show curvature in the distance you measured?
He’s back!
WELCOME BACK! We have been waiting.
Welcome back JTolan....!
thank you
@@jtolanmedia1 more please
After 3 years of interest in this FE theory, I have come to resonate with it. What a trip. Thank you for your hard work. Falling backward at 1000 MPH watching a sunset. LOL
Soooooo happy you're back I was very worried.
Lloydstrom - Much agreed on both points!
Same
I remember watching perhaps one of your first investigations regarding the flat earth phenomenon. It was funny and exciting at the same time because you we’re discovering for the first time with you own eyes the reality of something very different from what you had been taught and thought all you life, like the rest of us. Thank you so much for you analysis with your math skills. Appreciate it. God’s blessings on your work. Shalom. I’m pretty good with a tape measure, but your skills are off the charts!
Fantastic. Glad you have included calculations for the arc length over the distance based on the POV angle.
Thanks once again for opening our eyes to the true nature of our earth.
*LYING* flunts!
@@CNCmachiningisfun You dont have to listen to him, just do the testing yourself or watch the image frames. Or, you can LIE to yourself!
@@philindeblanc
The ONLY liars here are the flunts and religiots.
Get a life!
@@CNCmachiningisfun Crooked minds can't see straight!
The best minds in medicine killed Washington because they thought he just had bad blood. They took a little then a little more until he died. All he had was a cold! Cosmology is a religion because you have to have faith to believe it! Do you believe they flew to Mars and launched a copter in a 1% atmosphere?
O by the way the Bible has been proven over and again about kings and lands yet science updates over and over! The journal Science printed the universe may be in the shape of a Croissant! They are laughing at you!
If you can look at a Bible without garlic around your neck read Matthew 24. It is about our Earth and people TODAY!
@@jondularswoods6461
Your contempt for science, and reality, is really sad.
Hopefully, you'll *GROW UP., AND GET A LIFE.*
Yeah, like THAT'S gonna happen.
*DOPEY* theists, and their kiddie fiddling gods!
[edit: watch the 3D clip on a computer monitor, not a large TV, the spacing between red and blue is too wide and you won't perceive 3D] my spell checker failed , intro slide typo "Photogrametry" not Phtogrametry" grrrrrrr, let me know if you see any other typos, or errors. Maybe I'll upload a corrected one later.
23:25, if you noticed I adjusted the radius of the earth to 50 000 mi to try and curve fit the observed data, and the green line came up, (eventually, my computer was running slow and the update took a while) but even that value is not enough, the observed radius of curvature is more like 100 000 miles, but that's just because I did not fine tune the slope just perfectly, otherwise it would be INFINITE ! Just Incredible!
Thankful to our wonderful Creator for your big mind and gentle spirt. May He continue to bless and keep you and your family on this incredible flat earth. Thanks Jay
@@goerto thank you my friend, God Bless
Nice job bro, best regards from Poland 💪💪
*DIMWITTED* flunts and religiots!
@@CNCmachiningisfun
😂🤣😂🤣
ITS FLAT WHETHER YOU LIKE HIM OR NOT...☯️
I dare the deceivers to put THIS on the history channel..I'm going on 3 yrs with NO tell-LIE-vision.Thanks to the Creator!
Good for you. Hope you will never watch again. I don't watch tv since 2006.
Me too brother
I left TV in 2001. I tried again in 2011. It drained me. I lost energy.
Yea I unplugged in 2015 haven't had TV since.. Feel it's why I woke up quicker than most
@@J_Terrible Yet you watch flat earth on youtube. Same exact thing...
Thank you so much for all your work, and your effort in creating these videos! I absolutely love watching them, they're JUST INCREDIBLE!
Very, VERY interesting stuff!
I almost could see my cabin by leech lake, Minnesota.. Flatastic photography JT.
Again... You have blown me away
brother this is the best of the best... would love to hear more of what you think of satellites and space
thank you my friend, all glory be to the creator! -JT
Next “level”
So flat, I fly a lot. 3 or 4 times per week. Lately I've been taking my p900 with me. But I haven't yet purchased the filters. I get so much interest from other passengers . Seems to me that more people are interested in the shape of the plane we live on. Than ball previously proposed. I think within a few years. Our society is going to change its mind. Thanks for sharing.
I think him being an engineer went into his camera and removed some filters .One of his vids he explains it in better detail.
There are more than you realize. Google, Facebook and RUclips has made sure that it’s not even possible to debate the subject
can you take some videos
So I just bought a P1000 with the full spectrum IR conversion from Kolari and all the filters. I also purchased a genie 3 axis and I am going to 3d print a mount that I can suction cup to the window.
Been waiting for this one. Thanks so much for Sharing it! The Truth sets us Free! The more our eyes see, The more beautiful this creation is. Still in awe of THE Creator, Our Heavenly Father and The Word stands True, " it's immeasurable!! "
Sure what we all believed was the truth, was a big deal to thoses who believed in a creator, But This::EARTH,: Is month dropping everyday. Waiting on your 2 greater lights to rule the day and night video!! Thanks for giving us something to share with others. ❤ been a fan since your very 1st video. God Bless
thanks Kim, so true.
Merci JTolan Media1, votre message est passé, tout est plat..
Best flat smacking words ever spoken on YT takes place at 30:06 to 30:18
"It's a matter of truth folks. One simple principle that we get wrong and then we build a mountain of theoretical data on a crummy foundation"
God bless sir JT
wow i started reading this one comment at the EXACT same moment JT narrated it, it was so weird, but cool 😂
Oooooo yeeeeeeee JTolan the one and only...Thanks for this superb video.
Legend, thank you so much for sharing your observations JT. If a picture says a thousand words than your pictures finish a thousand debates.
well said my friend! -JT
Indeed
I recognize all those places. Lived in Vermillion SD and Sioux City IA. Had friends in Fargo! Saw Cherokee IA on the map. Had friends there too. It's pretty damn flat out there!! Excellent work.
Truth! So recognized americas lands
Great work JT and awesom analisys!!!
And Great to see you back.
Thank you very much for share.
With Enlightenment comes burden
Thanks for the lesson, JT..!!
14:37 Those longitudinal field gridlines really go a long long way. And really straight, and very parallel. Mind blowing!
Truth alone is important. Thanks JT
Why so few views and likes? This info is shocking and everyone should know.
Ohh this is the new new one!!!!
Hahaha you're a genius and a joy to listen too .. thanks for your time and work!!!
You dopey flunts sure do love being *LIED* to, by your fellow dimwits!
And you're here to watch and talk? Man you already have robots doing the art for you . Do you also milk your own oil and run away with nothing worth while to say after wasting your life watching liars lying to supposed idiots hahaha what does that make you 🤣
Thank you JT. People out there love your work
*DIMWITTED* flunts and religiots!
This is the channel I tell everyone to watch for the evidence of flat earth.
The infrared filter is amazing
Thank you very much for all the work you do, your detailed analysis is undeniably.
I do too. Some people just WON’T understand they have been lied to because it’s so huge.
Some of the best proof we have no doubt.
*LYING* flunts!
@@Hello_Poetry- they first need to have a distrust in NASA before they will open there eyes, you have to start with the moon landing. And the rest will follow. This is “American moon” these are ball earthers proving the Apollo hoax, ruclips.net/video/KpuKu3F0BvY/видео.html this is the best thing to start with.
@@fishfire_2999 Lol! Proves nothing. The earth isn't flat!!
Thank you for your amazing work! We appreciated so much!!🌟
Why do you like being *LIED* to by dopey flunts?
Flattastic analysis.
Practical reality.
It has been a simply incredible asset to have your perspective.
May the Creator continue to bless and keep you and yours.
Infra Researcher JT made his best video up to now with this, imo. Specifically the 2 degree thing is even nearly a no-brainer and the overall presentation is very well done.... INCREDIBLE!
Missed you J! Glad to see you made another video proving once again.
EARTH IS FLAT!
The earth is not flat, you *DIMWIT!*
Great job! How fascinating. What an ingenious idea to use infrared photography.
So, you like being *LIED* to by dopey flunts?
@@CNCmachiningisfun using the scientific method, have you got any globe proof? A Bitcoin is up for grabs if you do good😊
@@kanemclaren5991
Ships disappearing below the horizon. Sunrises and sunsets.
These, alone, are proof that the earth is NOT flat.
So, can you *PROVE* that the earth is flat?
*NOPE!*
@@CNCmachiningisfun you sound developmentally challenged
@@christylynn451
So says the *DOPEY* flatturd!
Thank you for your knowledge J. Keep up the good work. Your dedication is outstanding. God is good. Blessings to you all.
Always amazing analysis. I share your videos with every person I discuss the true earth with. Thanks for sharing.
*LYING* flunts!
The alleged curve shy away from the (nikon P900).
And will run and hide from the "red light" (infrared).
*DIMWITTED* flunts!
@@CNCmachiningisfun do you realize You’re like a little boy who curses Looking for attention?
@@anrepa59
Do you realise that you are supporting *LIARS,* by liking this video?
Grow up!
Great work!
Thanks so much for all the Truth you have provided. God bless you and your family.
Love your work JT. All my life irrespective of altitude observed reflection of sunlight over lakes and oceans is always straight never curved!
Imagine a device more powerful/advanced than a infrared camera ?
We would see notably further.
There's no curve upon the surface of this Earth.
And our visual limitations aren't restricted by a "physical" curve.
How about angular res, convergence, compression, dense air elements, haze, weather elements, water vapors, perspective, etc.
Notice how the horizon is extended based on the strength of the optic.
Eyes, telescopes, altitude, infrared.
And the horizon looks the same, as it's flat/level.
yes, best is Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR), I've worked with that and processed data, we can get stunning long range images of the ground miles and miles away. upcoming video will deal with that, I'm holding back for the right moment. :)
@@jtolanmedia1 Yes, and I got to believe the military (air force, navy) and maybe the army, have some advanced cameras/telescopes that can cut through the haze/dense air elements.
But of course that tech. will not be available to the general public.
If infrared cameras are available to the average person.
Then what type of zoom devices, that will allow the military to observe significantly further than a infrared ??
You got to believe they have them already.
@@BeyondInfinitePlains I'm personally excited about Sony coming out with a modified InGaAs sensor that works up to 1.7 um wavelength, that's the SWIR band, where we can still use glass instead of Gallium lenses as MWIR and LWIR. I tried to get my hands on these IR technology but they are ITAR controlled and targeted towards military and law enforcement, but the Sony sensor might just make it to the consumer.
@@jtolanmedia1 Good deal, and it doesn't surprise me that the IR tech is ITAR and reserved for the military.
You're the best! Thanks for your great investigative work and for sharing 👍
thank you
The horizon keeps extending 🤯 .. ⚰️🌎
*DIMWITTED* flunts!
Globe gets rid of a lot of questions , for myself , i dont know , until someone can show me a photo from space that hasnt come from a computer, , nobody does . One thing is for sure , our world and existence is far more strange than we can imagine !
Not true at all
Many pictures of the globe taken on film
the earth is peared shape....no, its an oblique spheroid, no....its spherical...no, its its its flat!!!
but its it's got to be 🤔
I saw Jackal in concert many yrs ago if you are familiar they had one song using the sound of a chainsaw think it was called lumberjack ?Been decades ✌
*MINDLESS* flunts!
Got the Woodward tv song going, love it. Welcome back.....
10:02 transition in presentation from straight in center of barrel to horizon in center of view.
Were you able to position your instrument's focal center level with the barrel center before any slight tilting to record angles?
I didn't hear it stated but I'm assuming that you did in fact center both. (I'm also assuming that your barrel distortion is the streamlined airliner glass)
It may have needed some bodily contortion within the seating area to achieve this precision.
Anyway, excellent video thank you!
Cheers!
THANKS FOR YOUR WORK. NICE VIDEO
Best described as a realm I suppose ... another great video bud, I look forward to each video you put out ..
Just curious if you have done night flights with long range infrared and how do they look? Thanks again for all your time and shared curiosity.
The very word "gravity" is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to gravity believing societies, to heliocentric oaths and to astrophysical proceedings...TY JTolan Media1
Nice one
If the words fit, you must use it 😎👍
J Tolund most appreciate all your videos just more intel for the decived souls that believe the evil spin, Thank you for your time because it matters !!!
*BRAINDEAD* flunts and religiots!
@@CNCmachiningisfun ~ Attack ideas ~ not people. When you attack people it just shows ignorance. May God remove the scales from your eyes.
@@boldasalion6436
Your god is imaginary.
Grow up!
@@boldasalion6436
What's the bet that you believe that the earth is flat?
@@boldasalion6436 whats wrong with you !!!
Amazing...
Yeah welcome back JT!! Absolutely stunning and fascinating views of the Flat Earth mid-west USA!! I use your videos in the 24 hour Flat Earth Discord whenever I'm debating or introducing the FLAT EARTH TRUTH to Heliocentrists and beginners!! So thanks for all your hard work and keep em coming!!👏👏👏👏👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾
*LYING* flunts!
Thank you Master JTolan !
The "globe like effect" might also be due to the airplane windows.
I think you may be on to something, that would definitely account for that tiny bit of what was counted as refraction in the calculations
As soon as he switched to infared the curve is gone
Good question: No curve seen from an air 'plane'
A) Fuselage is curved, designed for aerodynamics, means windows have to be curved to fit
B) Cabin is pressurized pushing outwards on windows causing slight buldge out.
C) People tend to see what they 'expect' want or programmed to see.
D) Globe math, not possible to see a curve even at 100,000ft.
E) horizon doesn't drop with altitude as necessary for a sphere.
F) people say curve is from left to right, never away and down as globe
G) Both sides of the plane and pilot would claim to see curve the same, (left to right) they all couldn't connect to make a ball
Yes, I've flown a few times and gave it plenty of thought and research.
@Happy Corona-Virus It is by design.
You *DOPEY* flunts need to lay off the crack pipe!
wou....immense !!!! thank fron Argentina
Its been a while sir
Generally speaking i tought you've been snatched by body snatchers GOOD to see you again sir
SO glad to see you back! I know I'm not the only one who was genuinely starting to get concerned about you! And justifiably so. Your work is some of THE most compelling evidence(proof, actually!) of FE! Potentially paradigm shifting! And TPTB abhor truth and its prognosticators. So, please keep us updated more often! Cheers!
If you use the same math on the stars and the moon you will prove that they are all the SAME distance away from the lens proving they are a projection on the firmament.
he would be just the guy to do it ...me thinks
Yes, I thought about that a few years ago and was going to buy a focuser with a micrometer for my telescopes, then as we focus on a mountain top antenna, at a know distance from the telescope, then focus on the stars or moon, we can get the difference the micrometer changed and we can calculate the optical/geometric distance with the focus equation for a lens. But that difference is quite small, so I decided to do even better and buy two cameras and space them apart at large distances but aligned to get an even longer baseline much like the large array telescope. stay tuned -JT
@@jtolanmedia1 I cannot wait to see the results of that !!
I am pretty sure I know what you are going to find :)
@@jtolanmedia1 thank you. You could also use this to determine the distance the moon is from the earth and stars too as we know in reality the are not so far away. I look forward to you taking the time to do I am sure another great analysis.
BRAINDEAD* flunts and religiots!
THANKS FOR ALL EXPLAIN IS INCREDIBLE. BLESSINGS.
Hey, you're back!
great work king
It's about time! Haven't seen your vids in a while!!! I deleted my FB so I'm glad your still on youtube! I've been hearing a lot about Gab and I'm on telegram too if your there talk to you later man going to watch this video now!👍
Infrared may bend the least, but it still bends, otherwise it could not be focused by lenses and your infra red photography wouldn't work at all. Furthermore, you're comparing boundary refraction where the light suddenly refracts at a crisp boundary between two densities.
Atmospheric refraction is GRADIENT refraction, where there is no boundary, and that may not split up the colors so much. In fact it may not split them up hardly at all, otherwise stars would separate into a rainbow line near the horizon because remember, a star appears to slow down setting as it nears the horizon, because things are refracted to appear HIGHER than they are, not lower.
Been waiting for a new vid. Thanks for this!
What stops you from seeing the horizon drop angle?
I was wondering if you knew anything about radar waves? I've used them in my younger years and since FE came along it dawned on me that I used to pick land up 75 miles offshore. The radar was appx. 15 ft above sea level. That means that radar waves are bending over the horizon which I don't believe is possible. That would almost equate to a bullet curving around a mountain. Or something like that 😅
yes, I worked as an EW engineer, that's how I began to wake up as well,
@@jtolanmedia1
*LYING* flunts!
Welcome back brother, maybe with a new job description you'll be able to share more of what you know.
God bless
Good to hear you again, thought they may have got to you.
There was a Boeing 777 flight from Hong Kong to Madrid last week that had to land due to another engine failure.
It landed at Moscow!
If you draw a line from Hong Kong to Madrid on a flat earth it makes sense but not on a globe. 🤔
Thank you for the tip. Cue the Great Circle Route idiots ...... crickets this time
@@michaeltaylors2456 Ok is It Really Necessary to Call us Idiots ? Yes You Can Believe a 2500 Year old Theory And i Have Sometimes Called Many Flat Earthers Morons But Only for the Laugh and You're Going all-on Serious Jesus Christ...
Nice Proof But There is An Explanation: Planes Don't Go In A Straight Line And This Plane Was Going Close Enough to Moscow For it to Land in There Because in a Round Earth Map the Plane DID GO ABOVE RUSSIA
@@_rakshas_ Quite right, the definition of idiot is an individual with less than room temperature IQ. I would argue that it is when one denies what is so plain and obvious. Ballers, being in love with being fooled with jargon, and taking leaps of faith, preferring fantastical stories and images to that of reality, may require a different term, delusional ?
Excellent work 👍
Amazing. We need footage facing the northpole, the magnetic mountain and rest of what they are hidding there. I wish I had the money to explore. I wonder how quickly one gets shot down if one actually went there in, let's say, a Jetstream without seeking permission.
Or just go there, not that hard?
I want to see some satellite out in space that could get the whole picture of the globe which they haven't in real time since they have all this awesome videos they could send back from Mars and I want to see the globe with airplanes flying upside down on the bottom of the ball that's what I want to see
Yes indeed! And ships floating upside down would be interesting too.
mars footage is devon island canada.
Fantastic work JT.
Great to see you back.
If you are not aware of the recent experiments by "Sky Free" you should checkout their channel.
Their results show that Refraction close to the ground is upward.
thanks, I've been saying that for a while so glad to hear others are proving the same thing.
Centripetal Force (aka. String Tension to hold an ball, in a ball string model) cannot be equated to gravitational pull. If the surface speed rotation of earth is around 1,000 miles per hour with a 40,075 km radius, the outward force will flung even the dust outward the atmosphere.
Earth is not consist of "magnets" as most of matter do not exhibit electromagnetic properties, earth is not made up of sticky objects and lastly most of objects on earth do not have strings or anchored to something. This is why centripetal force do not exist in a free (unstringed) body.
Centrifugal force is the only approved rotational force. This force can exhibit to micro to macro level where most of the mechanical equipments is designed (EG: Centrifugal Pump, Centrifugal Blower, (Centrifugal) Hydrocyclones, (Centrifugal) Cyclone Separator). Centripetal Equipments you will see is inefficient and works like a centrifugal equipments but the only different is that the fluid is the moving (this is not similar with the theoretical centripetal force and it is more like of "scooping-up" of fluids)
I am a licensed engineer in profession.
I can say the "Gravity BeLIEvers" is more likely a religion rather than a Scientific Movement. They refute the idea of "non-existence of gravity" because of an existing equation but cannot be proved true.
If there is a gravity, why helium ballons goes up and similar weight ballons with atmospheric air goes down. This cannot be defended using any gravitational equation. You can slap multiple equations but will end up with lots of error or correction factor, also when the object reach terminal velocities the equation will be ridiculously long and seemingly absurd (trying to fit on what you believe is hard especially you works agains what was observed naturally, which highly points out that the belief cannot exist in natural realm).
If you ask why gravitational accelation is constant? This equation is derived from earth's mass (who the hell weighs the earth), diameter/radius (ok tell me what measuring equipment they use for this) and a gravitational constant G (wut? It is derived from planck length, mass and time... it seemingly coming from the previous assumption, isn't it which is circular - using an similar assumptions to prove a similar assumptions is definitely wrong even in scientific aspect)
I can tell you simply that a gravitational constant is a "constant" and will just bloat or reduce the number in similar magnitude.
If the whole world decides to change its number or eliminate it (changing to a value of "1") the force equations will remain the same. The calculations of forces will just correct itself. The power and forces (anything with gravitational acceleration) will have just a different number but hey, you can relate or express the forces with "g" and without "g".
And finally the movement or particles up and down is highly due to the difference in density (oil and water, etc.). Why the ground soil is floating on water? It can easily answered by when water is pressurized, it can arranged it molecules to relieve the stress and its density is now greater than the rocks/soil below the ground.
This will also answer the the helium balloon goes up and the balloon with atmospheric air goes down. Similarly why carbon nanotubes defy gravity (floats) and all material less dense (lower density) than air will float. Also, Terminal velocity can be justified by the density difference (fix) between material. Therefore, falling is not because of gravity, it is because of difference in density. The plane fly because of lift, where air is compressed above the wings which the resulting density of compressed air is higher than the equivalent density of the plane. Note that accelaration (gravity) is more like of the time to have the movement in equilibrium due to difference in density.
Very interesting comment.
Here is something for you to consider :)
- When an disc rotates there is an internal stress generated "hoop stress".
- All of the mass in the object is constrained to move in a circular path by the molecular bonds of the material making up a disc.
- That amounts to the 2D cross sectional surface of the outer rim of the disc being able to withstand the total centrifugal force generated by the mass of the rim.
- An analogy would be pulling a rope from both ends . The total force is exerted on EVERY point along the rope . A long rope is the same 'strength" as a short rope because the breaking point is determined only by the 2D cross section (at the weakest point).
- So if we simply take a slice of the earth at the equator and rotate it at 15 degrees/hour ( which is 1040 mph at the equator )
- We find that EVEN if the earth was made of solid titanium it would not be able to withstand the "hoop stress"
- It is even more ridiculous if we consider . Fault lines, volcanoes, liquid core (i.e. no tensile strength) , surface covered with sand , water etc ...
Based on formula from "Materials Selection in Mechanical Design - Ashby 4th edition".
#include
#include
# define M_PI 3.14159265358979323846 /* pi */
using namespace std;
int main()
{
// Titanium.
double density = 4500.0; // kg/m3
double tensile_strength = 940e6; // mpascals
double v = 0.32; // poissons ratio
double radius = 6371000; // radius meters
double gravity = 9.81; // m/s^2
double angular_speed = 2*M_PI*(1.0/(24*60*60)); // rads/second
double area = 1; // area (cancels out)
// force in newtons (half of rim)
double total_radial_force = 2.0 * density * area * (radius*radius) * (angular_speed*angular_speed);
// resistance in newtons
double max_resistance = 2*tensile_strength*area; // 2 * cross sectional area
double max_angular_speed = sqrt(tensile_strength/(density*radius*radius)); // m/s
double max_linear_speed = 2.236936 * max_angular_speed * radius; // rim speed in mph
cout
@@decadent. True.. "Ball Model" will work only on the assumption that the mass stick together behaves as "One solid matter", when in reality it do not. If you consider that dust, rock, water, trees, air can stick together.
Intermolecular and intramolecular attraction has limits and attraction between non-magnetic molecules cannot justify how this things stick together on a rotating ball model.
It is not similar with an inflated ball, where the (hydrogen) bonds between sets of polymers will allow the ball to keep a spherical form without disintegrating in single polymers. Do you think your tree and the ground have that attraction?
You can calculate how much outward force (centripetal) is exerted due to radius of earth to the tree using your shared equation, now calculate the acceleration upwards... now assume the "Age of the Earth" and calculate what is the projected object velocity today.. you can now say.. "the earth will not exist based on that assumption".
Great read lots of good information being shared here. Perhaps you all can explain to me how the ball-Earth model stays in balance while rotating in the void of space because I can not picture how that model can maintain balance? Unless of course, someone is out there sticking giant wheel magnetic on the ball and we don't know it.
@@clevebarnes6620 Theoretically, Ball-Earth Model can stay in balance (circular shape) given that the attraction between individual object is balanced or in equilibrium. This can be similarly observed in a molecular level (atomic cloud) where electrons moves in a circular manner or ball shape (s-orbital), a slight imbalance or excess will end up a dumbell (single or multiple) and a donut shape. We know that electrons spins rapidly and moves at great speed this is why it is a good model. For earth shape using an electron model, it will high-likely to have a donut/dumbell shape rather than a ball shape given the assumption that the earth itself is magnetic and spinning.
@@gamemeta6764 that is helpful thank you. So does the ball-Earth model assume all the mass of the earth is distributed evenly within the sphere?
Thank you for your research! Try to conduct similar studies for the Moon and the Sun as local luminaries and you will be surprised no less. Good luck!
Where is the video of you flying from Chicago to Buffalo where Dave McKeegan points out you debunk flat earth?
increíble, saludos👏
spell checker failed , intro slide typo "Photogrametry" not Phtogrametry" grrrrrrr, let me know if you see any other typos, or errors. Maybe I'll upload a corrected one later.
23:25, if you noticed I adjusted the radius of
Great video.....as always 😊
thanks & hello from Plano, Illinois
Government will make infrared illegal now 😆
😆😆😆 true
Good to have you back!
I cannot get enough of your beautiful images of flat Earth.Thanks.
Amaizing truth revealed like it is , no spells no wizardy no manipulative cheep propaganda.
The reality beet the lie everytime.
One need to send love to engineers.
would like to hear your take on satelites.Do you ever film the night sky in infrared?
Too bad satellites aren't real. They are only on the ground and are fancy antennas
Image that appears at 10:16, performing shrinkage, demonstrates curvature of the earth, congratulations!!!!
What is your infrared camera and setup?
Your videos and photos never seize to amaze me
*STUPID* flerfs!
Beautifully done Brother thank you! 💙🙏💪✨😊✨
Great work, keep on it!
Ждал твое новое видео! Спасибо!
what do you think of this telescope they are advertising on the net
It’s amazing and beautiful. Thank you once again.
God Bless you.
big work my friend !
ma tu, dall'alto del tuo genio, li hai capiti i calcoli che ha fatto?
JT what is your opinion of us being in a simulation??
Thanks for the videos. Amazing to watch.
Però che bella terra tonda che di vede dall'aereo!!!! No volevo dire assolutamente orizzontale l'orizzonte e la curvatura dov'è?
28:40 this past year has certainly shown that
good to see you are back
Did you detect 0% curvature? If the Earth were spherical, what minimum maturity would it have to have in order not to show curvature in the distance you measured?