Listen to Michelle Pelletier during sentencing
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 ноя 2015
- Michelle Pelletier, the sister of Sean Pelletier, who was shot and killed by police on May 14, 2015, was sentenced to probation by Judge Paul Bridenstine for resisting and obstructing police in connection with a May 30 incident at the Pelletiers&apo
And so, what was the sentence. Why do you think we watch these for. I agree with the person who said, this was a waste of my time.
Probation
Thanks CD ,should have got more than that.
It tells you in the description.
I agree, what's the point of this video??? wasted my time also.
Reading comprehension is a wonderful attribute.
In other words, your defence is meaningless to us.
This video, all 100 seconds, shows the sentencing after the trial where she got to present her defense. The Judge doesn't have to hear it while sentencing, it's a little late.
...shut up...I'm letting you go
Someone accustomed to bullshitting their way through life discovers the court finds bullshit inadmissible. Good judge there.
Obviously, you know nothing about the case.......along with the fact that she has NO PRIOR record.....SMH.
What’s scary is people like Dale get to vote
@@kelly8431 Says the person with the subnormal brain.....
Courts are full of bullshitters and corrupt judges, lawyers, DA's. Anyone who thinks courts are bastions of righteousness is a delusional brainwashed moron. Cops charging people with "obstruction" is their cowardly and corrupt way of bullying the public and covering up their own criminal actions. What this corrupt judge said about people taking the stand and "talking about anything they want to talk about" is his corrupt way of silencing and railroading a citizen in favor of covering for cop's criminal actions. These are bullshit charges in a bullshit court in a bullshit corrupt injustice system run by criminals.
@@soundhealer6043 Most of them are Kangaroo courts making money for lawyers, judges etc,they will criminalise anyone for their ill gotten gains,it amazes me how people put these control freaks on a pedestal.
"Waste of internet space!"
Weird case, she got probation & was held in shackles, strange.
Exactly.....
I’ve seen many violent criminals sit in court in a suit without restraints.
@@climber950 yea still strange
I thought she killed someone the way she was shackled her hair was done nice lol
Every time I go to court I'm shackled I've been a few times for driving without a license it's standard procedure unless there having a jury trial
Edit that's if I haven't bonded out
Seems strange to see a prisoner bound in manacles appearing before a judge who settles for a sentence of probation. I guess for a serious offense they wheel them in on a Silence of the Lambs dolly.
rushmore IV 😂😂😂😂
Well It is America ,
No, everyone is treated the same, unless, of course, a person is a spitter or known for some other egregious behavior. Then they might get further restraints.
Its because she's been convicted, but not yet sentenced. So they treat them like the judge is going to read out a death sentence. If she was still in trial then she'd be in civilian clothes.
These are the same animals that will take a five year old or a ninety five year old, stuff em and cuff em, and think nothing of it. Not long ago, armed criminal police gang members, killed a 90 year old. Her crime. Her lawn was unkempt, beyond code for height.
Your defense attorney does NOT want you running at the mouth as you are more likely than not going to give the prosecution more info with which to convict you. If there is key info, you tell your defense attorney and they will bring it up at the appropriate time.
Unless ..... unless, the running of your mouth is captured on video and posted on RUclips, then go right ahead. It makes for very enjoyable viewing!
Long as theyre a good lawyer
If they really don’t like you, they may just sit back and be co-council.
This is not true in most cases today. Unfortunately, today's criminal court system is so overwhelmed and back longed, that the vast majority of cases are disposed of as fast as possible by plea bargain. I would guess that at least 60 percent of cases where somebody is represented by a public pretender, their lawyer has spent less than 15 minutes with them before they appear in court to plead out. This is a sad reality of a broken system.
What she is trying to say is her brother had no weapon and surrendered by putting his hands on the trunk then the police killed him, she was railroaded by a super corrupt system.
Her attorney could have brought anything she wanted to say up, in the examination on the stand. Court Is not Facebook.
Exactly. There’s also the option to appeal if she feels as though she was misrepresented
Not really., that’s why he didn’t bring it up. If he did bring it up, it may have been at the bench or in his chambers and he denied it. More than likely it was something that obviously had no bearing.
Everyone deserves to speak to defend themselves, that is what a fair trial is! Obviously, and as usual, the US “justice” system is purposefully covering up for the true perpetrators, which are commonly police bullies, otherwise they would have let her defend herself! People wake up! This is so common, you could be next! Police and judges and lawyers all work together to protect themselves and to profit off the vulnerable and the innocent! This poor girl is the victim of these “men” who are participating in a cult for profit! Once one of the cult members starts exposing the system they are covertly snuffed out of their job. It is up to the public to hold the judges and police accountable and lawyers should not be allowed to speak for people! We should all have a quick jury trial for every crime ASAP and most crime and false arrest would evaporate because most of this chaos would be stopped! Lawyer profession used to be against the law at one time US! Government is purposefully putting innocent people in jail and giving criminal records to profit off of them and control them, then they are coerced on psych drugs and totally mentally destroyed until some real bible believing Christians starry following the scriptures to rescue them from this demonic growing cult. Now it has turned into a global cult and they are vaccinating people as another way to get drugs into them! There is no virus ever proven to exist, illnesses are same illness people have always had, drugs don’t cure anyone, that is medical cartel tied in with government for profit! Wake up people this is NWO, mass genocide program going on. Unite and protect each other from this evil! Corrupt cult! Don’t trust or get involved with police or lawyers or government at all!
Courts are full of bullshitters and corrupt judges, lawyers, DA's. Anyone who thinks courts are bastions of righteousness is a delusional brainwashed moron. Cops charging people with "obstruction" is their cowardly and corrupt way of bullying the public and covering up their own criminal actions. What this corrupt judge said about people taking the stand and "talking about anything they want to talk about" is his corrupt way of silencing and railroading a citizen in favor of covering for cop's criminal actions. These are bullshit charges in a bullshit court in a bullshit corrupt injustice system run by criminals.
This isn’t Facebook, it’s You tube, the ultimate reality network.
I guess when she saw her brother get gunned down by police infront of her she was upset so didn't immediately comply with the police so they charged her
exactly this. people don't operate in society as they are supposed to in a courtroom.
Agreed. She didn't bow down to her public servants so they retaliated.
That's what I was thinking. She sees her flesh and blood being killed by police, do they not think she's going to get a little emotional and behave irrational? Human nature isn't exactly logical.
@@savafanbryan oh give me a break. There are ways things are done for a reason. You wouldnt be saying this if you didnt follow the cop hating crowd and feel like you can puff your chest up. What a joker, no cops worried about what you think.
@@savafanbryan Bingo. And the judge is covering for them, as they do.
There was enough police presence that you should have behaved differently...........I don't know anything about the case, but that certainly doesn't sound right
I guess when she saw her brother get gunned down by police infront of her she was upset so didn't immediately comply with the police so they charged her
@@slicingonions4398 You're an idiot. It had nothing to do with her brother. Her mother was trying to evict her and her sisters, so they had a standoff with the police after reports of gunfire were reported from the house.
Everyone knows that 1 person that can talk in such circles that by the time they're done talking you have no idea what happened in the first place.
Well stated … I’ll write this down for future use.
Trump’s Senior Counselor Kellyanne Conway was an expert.
The judge gave his comment, without ever looking at the accused.
That's fuckin sociopathic...
Go with a jury trial always and never talk to anyone but your lawyer
Why did you cut this short in the middle of a sentence (both forms of sentence, ha)?? Sort of left things hanging.
Right
@@stephentarabetz7192 A hanging judge? Suspended sentence?
Because the person who posted the video was a mental case thats why...
The point of posting this was?
Okay, what was the alleged offense and the sentence?
It literally says it in the description.
If RUclips was a place to read, there’d be no videos, Assley.
@@adriantate7582 "Assley" 😂 Haven't heard that one since 5th grade, nice. The description box provides a description of the video. Don't resort to insults because you can't read.
People don’t click “Play” to read, bro.
@@adriantate7582 Of course not. But people with questions about the video should click on the description. Just like the play button is a core function of the website, so is the description box.
But I'm not gonna argue the importance of reading with someone clearly old enough to do so. It's not that deep & doing so would have instantly answered your question. As you were.
No we can't have people telling their side of the story in court.
They have ALREADY told their story when they appear for sentencing...Lawyers represent them and as t their trial they have the option to testify or NOT..
BUT not ramble on...stick to the answers asked by the attorneys...This is not Jerry Springer or TV drama..who let people ramble on...
Watch Judge Judy and maybe you will understand courtroom etiquette!
You make a ridiculous comment when you have no idea of what happened, typical of low IQ leftists.
@@joebrunette5594 ahh......except that I am a complete and total right winger, who happens to think that Trump is the greatest President ever.
Ghost of Reagan…your last comment explains EVERYTHING!
@@osmond0079 YES IT DOES !
You cannot talk about things they don't want to hear even though it may prove important. That's justice?
Yup. They will silence you.
There are rules and procedures that are followed. If Ms Pelletier had relevant information she should have shared it with her attorney. That's if she had the sense to get one.
@@bridgettebianchi9315 Because she was rambling about social issues and not the case
Her attorney could have brought anything she wanted to say, up in his examination of her...
free reign in court is not absolute. Imagine a defendant blabbing on for hours about their Amway business or rival criminal trials that are not relevant to proceedings. Evidence needs to be done professionally..
never never never refuse a jury trial.
Exactly. I had that choice i said jury so quick hired a good lawyer was in a poor city no evidence against me and victim was my boyfriend who refused to talk quickly dropped would've cost lots of money for that city and jury trial
@@lindsayjames3413
What if the corrupt police officers look the judge right in his eyes and lie him?
Police raided my place with no warrant with guns drawn looking for a little pot I had.
The police said I let them search my place and that is b.s.
I tried to tell the judge what really happened and was told if I'm not quite I will be charged with contempt of court.
I had a worthless public defender.
@@nickhill8612 ive been arrested twice for calling for dv after being beat i can say now after cases dismissed cops are bs and judges and co and po and everyone in justice system they make their own rules period
@@lindsayjames3413
Sad but true your absolutely right.
Its case by case and I am sorry.
Here's the REAL STORY SHE'D BE FOUND GUILTY STILL...www.mlive.com/news/kalamazoo/2015/11/sister_of_portage_man_killed_b_1.html
What did she do,?
Michelle Pelletier, the sister of Sean Pelletier, who was shot and killed by police on May 14, 2015, was sentenced to probation by Judge Paul Bridenstine for resisting and obstructing police in connection with a May 30 incident at the Pelletiers&apo
@@RobertPunt we can read the info on the video too bro. I guess when she saw her brother get gunned down by police infront of her she was upset so didn't immediately comply with the police so they charged her
@@slicingonions4398 Paul was not able to find the information himself. I think it's a American thing. To ask for help before looking yourself
If only there was some way you could find background on these RUclips videos, like typing in a name and hitting "Enter". The world deserves such a system!
Its so refreshing to see more and more women going to jail for long terms. Equality is alive and well in America.
She got probation, not imprisoned
Bruh tf u talking about she ain’t even go to jail
@@pepino1618 There's mommy issues and there's 'women being heard and believed way before men' issues too, two very different things, both exist and jumping in and boil it down to the latter only exacerbates the problem
And yet mobster and compulsive liars and tax evading criminals with a whole gangster mob of criminals can be president via lies, spin, exaggerations, encouraging treason, committing treason, tax evading, hate mongering constant and compulsive lying!
@@nightlightabcd Hillary Clinton is not president
There are a lot of people in the comments that have no clue how a court functions. Everything in a trial is known ahead of time so opposing counsel can prepare an answer, or so the information can be vetted. You can’t just talk about things no one knew about ahead of time, even if those things are firsthand accounts. Now, she can appeal the verdict, however, appellate courts don’t dispute the facts of the case. They dispute technical errors in the legal process that could have found a person guilty.
I think you can bump your first statement up from “a lot” to a “high majority”. You know Matlock always got the real bad guy to confess on the stand.
People believe court is like tv shows. No way can you just blab on and on ,like they do on t.v.
Courts are full of bullshitters and corrupt judges, lawyers, DA's. Anyone who thinks courts are bastions of righteousness is a delusional brainwashed moron. Cops charging people with "obstruction" is their cowardly and corrupt way of bullying the public and covering up their own criminal actions. What this corrupt judge said about people taking the stand and "talking about anything they want to talk about" is his corrupt way of silencing and railroading a citizen in favor of covering for cop's criminal actions. These are bullshit charges in a bullshit court in a bullshit corrupt injustice system run by criminals.
@@soundhealer6043 you don't seem to be content. How many more times are you going to copy-paste-ventilate your dissatifaction with the system?
@@ronaldvandenberg8168 As long as I feel I want to. Capiche?
clear case of treating people like an assembly line
not entirely the courts fault, so many people are waiting for court, caused mostly by their guilt. People make the mistakes and people cause the wait.
So time served and probation. This girl had all rights as she watched her brother gunned down by police
I love this judge. You can’t let just any criminal speak on the stand about anything they want to talk about. 🙌🏽👏🏽
I know the poor SJ frauds cannot stand it when they told to stick to ANSWERING Questions asked by lawyers .Omg imagine that no one wants to hear their bullshit .
@Mr Kentucky Redneck DUE process is for EVERYONE regardless of what you think .
@Mr Kentucky Redneck Gee thanks it's not me saying it's every American right under the US Constitution . Yes even worst scumbags on earth are entitled to die process
@Mr Kentucky Redneck
Absolutely correct, people have the right to be incredibly stupid. However, speaking about everything but the case at hand is equally stupid.
Judge is an a hole
Her two brothers were attempting to evade police and went for their guns. They lost. Even their own mother knew they were all crazy.
Of course they were going for there guns...lol
Idiots.
@@bradholland772 There is no "of course" to this their Mom was trying to evict ALL 4 ADULT CHILDREN FROM THE HOME SHE OWNED THEY REFUSED TO LEAVE Michelle, Amy, the 2 brother's lived there.. The cop's aren't in the wrong here the Brother, Michelle, & Amy are there own Mother knows it
Single mother household I'm sure
The younger generations has grown up with Reality TV and Oprah et. al..
The cold-cash on truth without any blah-di- blah wishful justifications, excuses and flat-out lies is how kids are brought up now.
At 68 I’m a drop-lit from the mainstream. This judge drives straight up my alley. No buzzwords or cliches, Just get to the point. The truth.
The fact you think younger kids have "grown up with Oprah" shows just how completely out of touch you are....
The truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, unless the Court doesn't want to hear it.
Welcome to American justice..where you are guilty until proven innocent,AND DON'T HAVE THE RIGHT TO SPEAK ON YOUR BEHALF,SO THE COURT CAN DO AS THEY PLEASE...
We are presumed innocent, until proven guilty by a court of law. This is American Justice.
So much for being sworn in to tell truth the hole truth nothing but the truth. If they cut her short like they do all the time how can somebody say the whole truth. Dont swear anybody in if you not going to let them say the whole truth. Because there's more than YES or NO to the whole truth. But the state only let's you say YES or NO. Go figure.
You don’t know how trials work do you? The judge actually explained it if you were paying attention.
Before the trial starts there is a hearing that you can bring all of the evidence that is going to be used in trial. You don't get to bring surprise evidence in the middle of the trial. If there were facts that she didn't get to express, they should have been brought forth in the evidence hearing. These type of things are one of the reasons why you can appeal your verdict.
The defense does not have to share evidence with the prosecution AT ALL
She probably had a public defender.
I disagree. Witness testimony can always change during trial.
Does this vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction?
I was of the belief that it does.
@@iFixJunk Hmmm , that's a good question to ask. 12222
The judge was cut off too.
Where would he complain...🥴
The mother started the eviction on the two daughters that ended up with one of her children getting shot to death and the other three going to jail. Some family dynamic going on there. Bet their Thanksgiving is going to be rough.
Yes, it's hard to comment in a sure way when we do not know the whole story, in fact, very little IN this video.
It will be called Thankstaking.
Here's the REAL STORY....www.mlive.com/news/kalamazoo/2015/11/sister_of_portage_man_killed_b_1.html
And her house rammed by a tank
In other words don’t go into court expecting to be able to defend yourself.
Who give permission for monuments to be erected to falling cops in police stations. where are the monument to CITIZENS shot and murdered by police. All monument should be removed from police departments
You certainly can't voice your side on the stand. Just allow the lawyer to manipulate the situation so the judge can render his guilty verdict.
You cannot allow defendants, witnesses and plaintiffs to turn a criminal court into a political forum.
Your lawyer should have given you your opportunity .
@@Harry-nn4px The trial courts precise words " we can't allow someone to take the stand and talk about any issue they want to talk about". I doubt very seriously this young lady who has never committed a crime before in her life was on the stand wanting to talk about the birds and the bees. She wanted her side to be heard and this simply did not happen. That is the real crime!
@@larlarkrumble7578 Krumble...if i am ever at the mercy of the court for some crime I committed, which I don't ever foresee, I will make sure to search high and low for the type of lawyer you are describing.
@@TheGolfster3 They’re there.
Would be nice if the audio had worked!
her defense should have given her the opportunity
This crap happened in my city, just weird stuff
None of them feel like they're supposed to be there. Jeez
Wow. Someone actually thought that this was an incident that should be brought to the RUclips audience. It might have been more interesting to instead watch the judge stand up and scratch his forehead. Unsubscribed.
hard to respect the judge, he doesn't even look at her.
Why did I click on it!!!
If you don’t like facing judges I recommend not committing any crimes.
But when you die physically, everyone faces the ultimate judgment.
The vid cut off.. :(
Who gets to decide if what she hasn’t said is relevant? Her attorney may not have been given the time to regroup a line of questioning which would have allowed her to have her say. I think the judge is a little pompous, myself..
Obviously you know little about law… this is not Instagram….
I don't agree with the judge's assessment that the premises was safe when in fact they ramed the front door discharging firearms and had killed the one brother and seriously wounded another with a gunshot wound to the head . The sisters have every reason to feel afraid and life in peril. It's idiotic that a judge would say that they should have felt safe. Looking at all the police murders that have taken place us there any wonder that there is unrest and not a feeling of safety.
She is 100 % correct, that is how they keep their jobs. Quite the common person!!!!!
Pro1er 1, I still didn't hear anything about probation.?
What the hell was this. Judge is talking and the video stops. Waste of people time.
What was the case about?
I feel people who want to take the stand, should take the stand. The accused should be able to make statements to aid in thst persons defense weather you want to hear it or not. I dont know enough about this case to understand why the judge made that decision. She should be allowed to aid her defense.
Kevin Mael +Taking part in one’s own defense is an absolute right under our system. Lucas John Helder (the mailbox bomb-boy of 2002) was ruled incompetent to stand trial because he couldn’t take part in his defense.
I don't know anything about this case, but it sounded as though she was making some speech or protest instead of actually defending herself.
She had already been convicted in a bench trial (her choice not to have a jury hear the case). The trial is the time to testify on your own behalf. The judge told her during the trial that she couldn't just sit in the witness box and talk about everything she wanted to talk about. Sentencing hearing is about getting sentenced. Not trying to bring in evidence to explain that she thinks she is innocent. If she thinks she didn't get a fair trial, the apply for an appeal. That's how it works.
What was that about??
so cops shot her sister we don't know why or what was going on except she obviously was trying to help her sister
Sean Pelletier was her brother.
We have 50 million kangaroos in Australia-if you need some to set up some more kangaroo courts just ask.
Wheres the rest i didnt hear the judge make a sentence...?
Allthings NOW sentencing was later. After 163 days in jail she got off with probation
Didn’t tell us anything. What was the crime, what was the sentence?
I guess when she saw her brother get gunned down by police infront of her she was upset so didn't immediately comply with the police so they charged her
I can't hear what you saying
You can't hear what WHO is saying? And, by the way, it's "you're", not "you". You apparently can't hear or write English.
This corrupt judge couldn’t show decency by looking at her but looked down the whole time? What a corrupt system we put up with.
All judges feel above the law and no need to look down at us American Citizens. "We The People"
All you saw was 100 seconds of a half day jury trial yet you make a baseless claim of corruption. The Judge was doing his job, he was looking over his trial papers and comparing it to what she was saying. Ms Pelletier was already found guilty by a jury. Where's the corruption?
@@Johnboy33545 Eh, it's a little strange to not look someone in the eye that long when speaking directly to them though.
What was her trial about in the first place??
Should see her lawyers face when she started speaking.
I was transported to court handcuffed to 5 other guys and our feet were shackled to I've been to jail a few times and I had family on the police force and I think the courts are a joke, I've done time when I shouldn't have and then I've got away with doing when I should have but whenever I was wrong I owned my own and pled guilty.
well, but you didn't 'own your own' until you got caught.
What crime did you do
Geez. How many times have you been in trouble? Sounds like a career criminal
Wise up
@@irisespindola2868 you don't know a thing about me but I'll be honest with you because that's the only way to be, I've been in a lot of trouble for a number of things that were usually the same thing that almost every body does and it was all attrituded to alcohol and I was usually the victim in my trouble but I'm no longer drinking and I don't get in trouble anymore so before you go and put a label on me I'm just gonna say this, everyone that knows me will say that I'm one of the nicest guys you'll ever meet but I had a drinking problem and I haven't drank since 2014 and no problems either.
Give me a break 🙄
"Court is bound by evidence", yet the Prosecutor can fabricate/speculate on "what you were thinking", Prosecutor's couch witnesses, so they can lie (on states behalf) "Paraphrase", and manipulate audio recordings (per a lawyer) Prosecutor can act as a character witness against you - BUT... "THEY ARE BOUND BY EVIDENCE and FACTS" - right???
Behind the scenes - it gets much worse - they couch officers on how to manipulate basic conversations to get you to give up your rights, agree for a full (side of the road) investigation, or have you incriminate yourself (FOR ANY CRIME AT ALL)...
Why do you think you got pulled over for "a wide left", and he/she is asking about - your driving?, where you were?, who you were with?, where your going?, who are you meeting?, are there drugs or guns in the car?, have you ever been in trouble before, ever had a ticket, etc...
All before running your name....
You think what??? Your that interesting, he/she just has to know about your life or he/she is there to help you??? Its all about OVERTIME, QUOTAS, and MONEY!!!
so what happened ?where part 2 ?
Man like hip hop but understand courtroom lingo
Wow, the judge just admitted to violating her constitutional rights and made that his reason for her not being able to have an adequate defense. Just amazing. Hope she was able to proceed with a new judge.
rubbish
how so?
That's not what he said. It's amazing how some of you invent facts to bolster your ridiculous beliefs. She was evidently attempting to admit irrelevant testimony to the case and the judge stopped it. That is not a violation of anybody's rights.
It is not amazing that you cannot comprehend what he said, most low IQ leftists have this problem.
@@joebrunette5594 and you just proved that your IQ is even lower with your statement. Have a cookie.
Lawyer at 0:10 👀👀👀👀👀👀
Okay, she looked over at her client. Fill us in.
@@Harry-nn4px The lawyer appears to be caught off guard by her statement
@@chioptnstdr3448 Okay. Any lawyer will counsel his/her client to say either nothing or as little as possibe ("Aw gee, I'm sorry"). I just read up on her deceased brother; a real work of art there.
It was clear to see the Lawyer didnt want her speaking, . Harry is guilty of an ignorant statement... Case closed
We’re is the rest of the sentencing? I guess we got cut off also.
I hope there is a god so these judges can feel what it feels like
Ken I have a feeling that day is coming the reason the majority of the system is now made up up of police and lawyers that in years gone by wouldn't make the cut is they have judges that back their arrests and sign off on warrants that never should get more than a second of thought and a lifetime of derision.But they want the police backing their morally bankrupt plays so one hand washes the other in most every town in every county and state across the country. One day the hoodlums and average people who have been screwed by the system and touch off a powder keg off violence that has been building for a long time. Then. They will get their punishment unfortunately many innocents will be caught in the Middle.
Everybody hope there is a god who will take revenge on personal issues. There’s no god. The evidence is clearly against it. But you are free to take comfort in warm fuzzies. You will never know for sure anyway.
This M logo looks like the Maury show logo
This story is so sad, I really hope this young lady has someone who cares about her to help her start over and to help her through her probation not to mention the loss of her sister.
When did she lose her sister?? Her sister was in the house when police arrived and she also refused to exit the house and was charged with the exact same things as her sister was. When this trial took place her sisters had not begun yet. There was NO loss of her sister. A couple weeks before this incident her brother was shot and killed by police so there was a loss of a brother but again she didn't lose a sister.
@@mikeawesome9212 Brother shot and killed, because of an eviction of their house, that's what started it all.
She’s a perfect example of todays stupid broad. She’s ignorant, at best she has a 6th grade education level.
I say lock her up and throw away the key
I want to know, "Where was the sentence?"
where's the rest of it?
Je suis resté très surpris qu'il y'a beaucoup de PELLETIER au Michigan. Il ne faut pas oublier que le Michigan fût jadis l'ancien territoire de la "province de Québec", soit entre 1763 et 1783 environ. Je Salut Tout les Pelletier du Michigan. De, Montréal, Québec.
Je sais un Pelletier au Ohio aussi
Je suis très content de ta réponse. Yess!
Merci à toi de ta réponse! Les Pelletier ont est tous cousins!
Mario Pelletier, Montréal, Province de Québec, Canada
Mes salutations aux Pelletier de l' Ohio. L' Ohio, ancien territoire de la Nouvelle France (1680-1763), et de la province de Québec (1763-1783).
What was the crime?
wow... the judge just railroaded her...
She must be a soverign citizen!
Found this late, but it looks like the sovereign citizens movement was right. With this current lockdown in my home state of Michigan, when I went shopping on senior citizens morning at Meijer's, you should have seen the terror stricken looks on the people as they nearly ran me over with their shopping carts. It saddes me to see my fellow Americans behaving this way. The SC movement predicted people would behave this way if the government and MSM would panic them, and sadly, they were right.
1:41 minutes I’ll never get back 🤷♀️
can we get some context behind this? lol
What was her sentence?
This is why we have a court of law
Well she's right about this court shutting everything down short ????? Wtf ???
Wow.
What did she do?
The police obstructed the police from doing their job
Any relation to the Pelletier's on American Loggers?
Usual stuff during trial, only allowed to answer yes and no , never allowed to have your say..
So what’s her jail sentence
1st Amendment not applicable to court proceedings?
Those chains are ridiculous. You wouldn’t see that in Europe in such a situation.
brings back memories of the old slave trade ....... what the he>> is with the manacles ? theres no way that manacles are constitutional . The wearing of chains in court along with prison fatigues presupposes guilt and biases everyone including the judge and the accused.
I like how he says: the courts are satisfied. Its time for a new government.
She was not very convincing in her argument and mumbled under her breath. If she really felt strongly about her "concrete reasons" then she should state them loudly and boldly. Logic gets beaten by emotions and showmanship every time.
Justice system is soo unbelievable
Wait, you can get killed if you fire at police officers?? Whhhaaattttt!!!????
Huh?
Mother wanted to have her children evicted, gets front of the house rammed by army vehicle executing the order
Maybe my phone but could not hear most of it
Damn I clicked this because I thought it was Michelle Pfeiffer
david cahyo me too 😂😂
Me too lmao
David Cahyo 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Me too
So what was she sentenced to?
Time already served in jail, one year probation and washing Judge Bridenstine's hair three times weekly.
What the hell ???
Well that's not cool he said he won't allow anybody to take the stand and speak