Terrifying Footage From Cockpit Shows Moment Boeing 737 Crashed Into The Sea
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 окт 2024
- This footage from inside the cockpit of an Air Niugini Boeing 737 plane shows the moment it crashed into the Pacific in Papua New Guinea, last year September, killing one person. It was filmed by an alarmed aircraft maintenance engineer on his iPhone.
Thirty-four passengers and 12 crew members were later rescued by local boats and US Navy divers, with six passengers seriously injured.
See Some Amazing Video Links:
G20 Summit - US President Donald Trump's Motorcade Vs Vladimir Putin's Motorcade In Japan
• G20 Summit - US Presid...
Flyboard Strapped To Feet Wows The French President. Outruns Lamborghini
• Jet Engines Strapped T...
Moment Climate Protesters Block UK Prime Minister's Convoy On The Way To Buckingham Palace
• Moment Climate Protest...
Don't Forget To Subscribe To See More Videos
It says "Glide slope" not "flight's low", LOL
Absolutely
@@collardgen was ready to post that myself. Glad I read the comments first.
Thatsit
And the "alarm" is "autopilot disengage" and "100" is not meters, it's feet...
Exactly., the EGPWS system never says "Flight's Low" ... it's GLIDE SLOPE!
Imagine a plane screaming "flight's low" at you instead of "glide slope"
@@bluekernel2448 Has Absolutely Nothing to do With The Language...The Language is The Language...Either People Speak it Correctly or Not...its The Person Not The Language
@@bluekernel2448 Why?...Which Ones do You Like
@@bluekernel2448 lol...How so Exactly?...When You Say English do You Mean Just Americans or The Universal use of The English Language?
@@bluekernel2448ENGLISH is the Universal language of All Aviation. All non English speaking Pilots must learn it. They have to all pass an English Competency Examination as part of the licensing requirements!
Lost in "translation" by a couple down below I see. I picked up on the humour in your comment
The RUclips subtitle/closed captions option wasn't available on this particular clip, which made the printed cockpit sounds overlay even more likely to confuse some viewers.
If it had been available, I wonder if it might have displayed something like this: "sing raid", along with "hide smoke". This might be a great warning delivery for a group of weed/pot entrepreneurial flatmates though, for if the police are about to go crashing through the door to their apartment looking for the crops and stashes 😁
I recall one particular rate of descent warning annunciator installed on the Boeing 747-400 simulator which, instead of annunciating "don't sink", would sound to many (pilots included) like, "don't think".
The clarity of these warning system annunciators appear to have improved somewhat over the years.
the same guy that created the subtitles are the pilots that did not decide to initiate a go-around
That’s not true at all
Where did you get this information
@@MusicianIsaacit was a joke
@@MusicianIsaac are you braindead or one of these pilots? 🤦🏽♂️
@@i3lackflo bro I didn’t realize it was a joke
You don’t have to get so offended
Calling me brain dead
@@erickaufman3007 bro just stop
they had 18 seconds of listening to "sink rate" and "glide slope" and still failed to go around
CVR recordings showed they ignored the warnings on previous approaches to Pohnpei and Chuuk. Reason: They intentionally flew in low to ensure early touchdown since the runways on those islands are very short. Bear in mind, those airports don't have ILS but only RNAV-approach (GPS-based) where there is only an imaginary glideslope, not a precise one. "Glideslope" warning can thus be ignored as long as the runway & PAPI is in sight. Which was NOT the case here. So the core mistake was: Not going around, when there was no runway visibility at minimums. It's suicidal to continue a non-precision approach when you neither see the runway nore PAPI lights.
Go around what the ocean?
@@MOAB-UT they were flying an approach. Maybe learn something about aviation before arguing with people on the Internet
African pilots.
@@MOAB-UT Go around means climb throttle and pitch up, not literal
"approaching minimums" - First Officer: ok let's switch the wipers on to ensure we see the runway, it must be hidden behind the glass ...
This is what you get ("flights low") when people who have no clue what they're talking about post RUclips videos. I don't know about anyone else. But when the AP announced "minimums," I didn't see anything that remotely looked like the runway environment - no approach lights, no PAPI, nothing. So a go around would have been mandatory.
It say "100" is mean 100ft, not 100m.
True
makes my guts churn zero vis and 100ft call.... jesus couldnt stop me applying full power.
Experienced pilots will know that Glideslope and Sink rate warning means that the aircraft is dangerously descending.if is alarm comes on approach,you can go around.and if this happens on descending,you should immediately add full power to the thrust leavers and start a positive rate of climb and stabilise at maybe 5000Ft.
Glideslope aural warning on non - ils approach maybe a false warning, but don’t ignore sink rate.
Experienced pilots will execute the go-around instructions on the airport's chart and climb to the altitude and the heading in the chart, not "maybe 5000ft". Also take into account that the engines might take several seconds to spool up and deliver full power while a microburst might suddenly make the plane go down several hundred feet in seconds. The power of the downburst can actually exceed aircraft climb capabilities.
@@thrustasymcomp9145 The fact that they did not execute ILS approach in that condition amazes me.
@@Anonymous-je7qc it happens sometimes
Except for xplane users. The atc just tell me to go around on stabilized approach 🙄
no need for another complaint of "thats not flights low, its glide slope" these videos are all voice to text by computer and not subtitled by human.
Then how come the “metres” was added to the end of 100?
A few things wrong with the subtitles, 1: Instead of "Flight's low”, the system is warning you "Glideslope", indicating that you are either too high or (in this case) too low, 2: 100 is measured in feet here, not meters
“Flight’s low? No, it is “Glideslope”
no its Flight’s low, im a professional copilot from bing
I remember when the GPWS first came out and the synthesized voice wasn't totally up to scratch back in the day.
"Terrain - Terrain" sounded more like "The Rain! - The Rain!" and "Don't Sink" sounded more like "Don't think!" .
They just got Mike Tyson to do the audio is all.
Hearing sink rate warning + Glideslope warning means you fucked up.
GLIDE SLOPE, NOT FLIGHT'S LOW
NOT 100 METERS, 100 FEET
💀
There is no excuse for this crash none at all. Controlled flight into Terran is pilot error.
100 means 100 feet not meters, and it was glide slope not flightslow
Captions be like "Aproaching Minions! Minions! Two barbecues! I like cake, I like cake! Flight's low, flight's low, flight's low!... One barbecue! Fighting... For him... thirsty... tuesday... Ben!"
I wish
Hilarious! 🤣
Yum. BBQ. Now I'm hungry.
Unreal how poor their decision making was here. He got them wipers going though!
Did The Cockpit Recorder Stop Working Upon impact?....Why Not Show The Entire Video?
This was recorded using phone. There is no camera on the blackbox. I guess the next part is a lil bit disturbing so they cut it.
So many moments here where they made Fatal errors that any trained or slightly knowledged Pilot or Hobbyist pilot knows.
1. No acknowledgement or mention of the fact they reached Minimums ie decision height, the height at which you are REQUIRED to say either 'Continue' if you can SEE the runway, or 'Go around' if you cannot SEE the runway. This alone should deem the crash to be 100% the fault of the idiots at the yoke here.
2. Radio altimiter ticking down, glide slope alarm, no visual below minimums, no pilot on earth has ever deemed these to be OK conditions for any Category of ILS or any landing system approach. A zero visibility approach REQUIRES that the ILS is functioning without fault, it's obviously retarded to have your only system of direction be malfunctioning yet be sat there ok with it.
3. Pilot monitoring didn't think that '100' is too low (even though 100 feet in most parts of earth is at the level of Trees, buildings, and ground), but then when he sees the fog closing he then thinks it's too low, Reaction time of a sloth.
English! Does every pilot worldwide know these English terms the plane shouts at them ?
Dude almost every commenter is telling you to fix the subtitles. Freaking do it.
That's not how videos work, bud.
unintelligible… incomprehensible???… why??? do not understand how this could happen. ‘minimums’ puts a chill in your spine.
Minimums is a callout from the airplane pulled from the data the crew setup in the plane's computer. It is specific to each airport's runway, airplane category and landing procedure and it tells the pilot they're closing in on the "Decision Altitude" (DA) which is the altitude limit at which they're supposed to go around if they don't have visual contact with the runway.
The callout in itself is absolutely normal and happens on every airliner landing, usually you can hear the captain say "continue" meaning they're gonna continue the procedure and complete the landing.
The issue here is that the pilots didn't call for a go around and decided to stick it anyway with 0 visibility while not paying attention to their instruments and trying to manually land the plane in conditions where only automatic landing procedures are allowed. The crash is due to several human errors and overall reckless and terrible piloting.
@@drymeen thankyou. I see. They were on approach/short finals. Now I get it. I could not understand how a crew could ignore the warning. They were expecting it. I know nothing of the accident other than the short video here.
The editor made it fade to black during the crash. That makes no sense.
It wasnt the editor....he obviously dropped the phone during the impact, which has killed one person....
The last time I flew my plane was like, "lose some weight, babe - lay off the McDonald's breakfast sandwiches for a while" and then, "that top you're wearing doesn't match that jacket, even though you think it does". It was pure horror!
glide slope, not flight low, what a joker
damn i never knew they changed "glideslope" to "flight's low"
it is a real crash
probably glideslope
That "Alarm" is the autopilot disconnect and it says "Glide Slope" not "Flight's Low" AHAHAH. BTW nice video edit
All of the alarms and the pilots still decided to continue instead of a go-around and try again...
Correct me if I’m wrong but if you can’t see the runway at minimums you need to go around. I think you would maybe need to auto land after the missed approach and once you are back on final.
Well you cant blame them, the flight was pretty low
WHY did this aircraft go in? despite all the automated warnings under the sun regarding their glide slope situation on the ramp? And (apparently) not even getting a visual on the threshold at minimums to boot?
This appears to have been totally controllable. Considering the conditions and circumstances atthe time, throttling up for a go around (even before 150) would have been the most appeopriate option to take.
Too many pilots unqualified to operate those magnificent flying machines?
Amazing that all but 1 survived. He was descending at about 20 ft/s into the ocean. There's another video of US Navy rescuing the passengers.
Uh. You don’t see the runway at minimum, you go around. Were they running out of fuel?
Cameraman never dies
😅😅
Plot Shield ®
Does in Skibidi Toilet
Tell this Alec Baldwin...
@@grande-bretagnenilpoints8912bro no one cares about skibidi toilet thats for little newborns
An unstabilized approach is an automatic go-around..
Why didnt they initiate a go around at minimums when you clearly couldnt see the ground at all?
This appears to be a case of pilot error. The auto-pilot disconnect warning horn sounds indicating the pilot disconnected the auto-pilot and they receive a “glide slope” warning shortly after. Then they receive a sink rate warning as they go further below the glide slope. If you look at the instruments you can see the raw glide slope information and see the airplane going further below gs. It looks like the pilot disconnected the A/P and tried to “duck under” the gs in an attempt to see the runway when transitioning from instruments to outside looking at the runway for landing. Warnings were ignored, probably due to task saturation trying to visually acquire the landing surface. I didn’t see any sequence flasher or runway lights. Possible that runway didn’t have them but instrument runways in the US are required certain types of lighting to accommodate certain types of instrument approaches. This is out of country so I’m not familiar with their requirements. Just my .02.
Thats what I thought as well because you could not see anything at min.
Exactly
Apparently they were intentionally went below the profile because of the short runway and that happened everytime they approach a short runway, which i never understand. I mean, the company must had done a proving flight before opening routes to that airport and it was proved the aircraft will be able to stop normally when flown on the right glidepath and then they make performance table for that runway for all condition, so why you have to doubt that data and start going on your own "the right and true" way, that i will never understand.
Rest in peace to everybody on board
10 years ago there werent many plane crash vids like this. As planes have aged and they didnt take care of them or build new ones, there's countless vids like these now.
"Flight's Low"
INFINITE IQ
'Flight's low' and 'glideslope' can both be heard depending on what you think in your mind.
If you think 'glideslope', you will hear that.
If you think 'flight's low', you will hear that.
One of those weird auditory things.
It's not "Flights Low" it is "Glide slope" Which is the angle, but could mean they are low.
I wonder why they disconnected the autopilot , their descend rate went over 2000’/min and not even attempting to correct that . Interesting
Chuuk airport has no ILS, only RNAV approach (GPS-based). Meaning: There is no precise glideslope, and final approach has to be flown manually with runway & PAPI lights in sight. They initially came in high (according to the CVR, the co-pilot says "three white, one red" = too high). The captain therefore deactivated the autopilot and "over-corrected" the descent rate. Problem: At 600 feet, suddenly a rain cloud appeared between the plane and runway. They lost sight of the runway and should have IMMEDIATELY started a go-around. Instead, the captain stubbornly insisted on continuing the approach, hoping for the raincloud to disappear soon. Which didn't happen. He basically flew blindly into the water.
they were so distracted twiddling the autopilot command knobs on the glareshield
I think the FO was just setting the missed approach altitude. Although, probably way late in the approach to be doing that in low IFR. But a wasted effort in any case since none of the crew thought that going missed was a good idea.
werent they supposed to go around at minimiums? im not a pilot so i wouldnt know but i remember hearing that if u cant see the runway by then than go around and idk if this wasnt an ils landing since u can hear the autopilot disconnecting
At minimums, unless the runway is confirmed to be in sight, the approach is stabilized and on glidepath, the go around is mandatory.
There are no further decisions to be made at this point other than to go around.
The only exception would be if there is not enough fuel remaining for another approach.
They were given every opportunity
Flight's low? LOL
unbelievable, over 20 seconds to either correct, or go around. 3 different aural warnings, clear sounding MINIMUMS indication. And no reaction from the crew... that is so poor.
What the fuck man….. They ignored it… Captain was showing off to the engineer on board or what
100 FEET not metres. All Altimetry is in FEET! The RADIO ALTIMETER , which is what that was, calls all Altitudes in FEET. Only Russia and China use metres for their Altimeters!!!
Looks like a simulator to me. Tho it was a real crash, not this cockpit i believe
Also these shitty captions could not be more wrong. It’s “Glide slope” and the 100 callout is for 100 feet not 100 meters
“Glide Slope”
It's glide slope not flights low
Why didn’t they use ILS approach?
This doesn't look like real video of an accident. Is it a mock up or something.
What flight is this then?
It’s glide slope not flights low
What the hell did I just watch
The plane is screaming at them that they’re too low and off glide slope… wtf happened here?
seemed fake...but I only watched the beginning and the end. Took 7 seconds
Bro glideshope note Flight's low 💀
Is it just me or did they descend below minimums without a runway in sight?
Those 2 should never see the inside of a cockpit again.
What happened to the GPWS?
@user-od8si2wj6o
NO
The GPWS reduces the altitude at which it is going to give you a warning the closer you get to the airport. This is done to avoid unnecessary warnings when landing.
Instead of recording, maybe full throttle and pull up.
Where's the EGPWS callouts-"terrain terrain terrain TERRAIN TERRAIN TERRAIN"?
I find this questionable. No screaming or anything. I've been in a cockpit and that was way too calm.
What cockpit have you been in that there was screaming happening 😂
Good job 🙂
If field is not in sight at DH GO Around.
flights low my ass💀💀💀
"Flight's low"
No sh*t, Sherlock.
It’s glide slope
Flight's slow 💀💀💀 its "glide slope"
"Flight's low" 💀
Your subtitles are wrong
Only one question. Why didn’t they go arund at minimums?
Damn they cant see shitt thats scary
So it didn’t crash but ditched?
WTF IS FLIGHT'S LOW
Yeah wrong subtitles
@@collardgen It`s not. It`s GLIDE SLOPE. Meaning they deviated dangerously far from where they should be on the ILS Glide Path.
@@BlackFoxFalcon I mistakenly just put "yeah" as in what is even flights low, it's glide slope.
So I had to edit it.
@@BlackFoxFalcon thanks for the information.
Flight's low? Is glide slope
Absolutely incompetent pilots.
Isn't that Glide Scope?
was level on artificial horizon but descent rate indicated a solid drop , very avoidable
Dumb & Dumber at the controls.
It didn't say flight is low it said Glide slope glideslope glideslope
Which airline? How on earth did they have someone filming??
No information given here but I think it's Air Nuigini. They landed in the water short of the runway from memory.
Nope I didn’t see a plane crashing into the sea
Flight’s Low…….yes
Half of these subs is just wrong
If Joe Biden were a teleprompter...these captions would be it.
Spot on ! And there would be some jackass deflecting it as well !
You're THAT guy, aren't you? You know, the guy that wedges his idiotic political ideology into EVERY conversation, regardless of topic. And you wonder why you never get invited to any parties.
@@bostoncityofchampions6581 Haha I love triggering fragile liberals like yourself. If I was a Biden supporter like you I'd probably be just as delicate as you, so no worries mate.
“100”
That made me shit
Well that was a waste of time.
I wasn't terrified at all. The footage is not "Terrifying".
It doesn’t seem to terrifying until you hear how many warnings were going off. “Glide slope” warning (not “Flight’s low” like in those subtitles indicates) is a warning that indicates that you’re below the normal glide path. This can be very dangerous especially in low visibility situations like here in this video. “Minimums” is a warning that informs you that you have reached your MDH ( minimum decision height). At that point your approach must be stabilized and you must visually see the runway. If you don’t see the runway or your approach isn’t stable enough then you have to initiate go around immediately and without hesitation. Not doing so strictly violates standard operating procedures. Those procedures are there to ensure the safety of all people on board and they are there for a reason. In this case pilots ignored all of the warnings and continued descending despite (most likely) not seeing the runway at all below their MDH. And that’s unfortunately why they crashed.
Glide slope* not flights low
Minimums exist for a fucking reason
Uh... no, click bait.
This pilot must probably have 50 logged hours and none of them IFR, jezz... #FECHADOcomBOLSOMORO22
Simulation?