As a side note, there is another squad organization floating around that's 10-men with 1 Squad Leader (with a UBGL), 1 Deputy Squad (with a UBGL) Leader, 2 SAW Gunners, and the remainder riflemen. However, I've only seen this in one place (and copy pasted from it elsewhere) with no supporting photos so it is not included in the video.
Cameron Campbell Basically the Japanese in WW2 had three lmgs and three light mortars per platoon, with the light mortars concentrated in a weapon squad while each rifle squad received an lmg. Thus in Imperial Japanese infantry doctrine, mortars were king.
Not that amazing considering the fact theyve adopted a "steal everything that isnt nailed down" approach to technology, intellectual property, and ideas and what they cant steal/copy they buy. Combine that with the fact they realized having a massive land army didnt matter jack when they saw Iraqs massive but poorly trained and modestly equipped army get slaughtered in Desert Storm so they realized they needed to downsize relative to their population and that extra funding they saved allowed them to modernize and their growing economy also helped alot. The fact they want to become an imperial power again makes it all the more important to have a strong, more elite military similar to what the british did (large militaries make it almost impossible to have an over seas empire while a small elite force makes it easier)
@@arthas640 You do realize the NATO alliance including US practically outnumbered the Iraqis 8 to 1 in terms of manpower, vehicles, jets and naval assets used right? The Iraq war was literally a group of 10+ advanced nations bullying Iraq.
@@arthas640 look the US military steals anything they dont have too. Its the only responsible thing to do. What do you want them to do? Risk their soldiers life just bc of moral concerns about “stealing” technology concepts?
@@arthas640 check out all the nazi war criminals pardoned by the USA and Soviet union for the sake of knowledge. Where do you think a big portion USA’s advanced tech came from
@@hitmanyang319 They did cover up many Nazi's but people tend to overstate how much tech the US and Soviets took. The US had the Nazis beat in many fields by the end of the war and really the only areas the Germans were ahead in were jets and rockets, both things the US was already developing on their own but that the Germans could improve. Other areas the Germans excelled at were mostly civilians fields, like physics, and many of those scientists moved to the US willingly because the Germany economy was devastated, the US had some of if not the best research facilities and universities in the world, and the US could pay more then anyone else. People also tend to forget that the German aerospace industry was non existent after the war, it took years to even restart and decades to rebuild. Countries as far off as Argentina were hiring German engineers to start civilian aircraft industries or to refine their own domestic designs. Basically the US and Soviets used the Germans to advance their aircraft and rocket designs but that was pretty much it. The other stuff they "took" was just to compare to what they'd developed themselves. The Germans were really struggling towards the end on R&D so their later tech was actually inferior to what the Soviets and Americans made on their own so the German versions were just a curiosity and not some brand new thing
Americans just have to accept that even though Chinese copy and imitate everything we do, that does not mean we should underestimate them or take it as a sign of weakness. They are basically hitting the fast forward button to catch up and potentially surpass the US Military and the only way to do that is to copy what works best.
It's honestly stupid to not copy from the best, especially in weapons development when survival takes precedence. "Yes we should reinvent our tech so to not trigger the netizens"
@@berettaxd7566 No you are wrong, don't take it too much for granted that everything is a sheer copy from you. Reverse engineering is a demanding job that very few of this world could do.
@@LongVu-lh9el You forgot about 2 Air defence battalions in both regiments and brigades (they have the same equipment iirc). First one is called an "AA artillery-missile battalion" and has 6 artillery-missile vehicles (2S6 Tunguska or ZSU-23-4 Shilka with Igla missiles) and a sub-unit with a number of hand-held AA missiles. The second one is an "AA missile battalion" with just 12 2K35 Strela-10 vehicles, to be replaced with 12 9M337 Sosna-R. Sometimes important units have a different air defence system here. For example a 39th separate motor rifle brigade based in Sakhalin is armed with 8 S-300V systems here. Some others may have 12 Tor-M1-2/M2 missile defence systems.
@@LongVu-lh9el What you described as a "122mm gun, towed or on BMP" is actually a 2S1 Gvozdika self-propelled gun. Towed D-30s are out of service in ground forces by now, they are only used for training, in VDV and Rosgvardia internal troops. There are also often 152mm self-propelled guns, like 2S3 and 2S19 in regiments instead of 2S1s, this used to be mostly in tank regiments, but nowadays it's also very common in rifles brigades, not sure about rifle regiments. It can be subject to change or variation though. There's also nuance, like motorized rifle regiments' tank battalions sometimes having 31 tanks (3 companies) instead of 41, like brigade tank battalions do. Also you're completely wrong about brigade artillery. They don't have "just one battalion" - they have, on paper, three. The Russian name for an artillery battalion is "дивизион", which obviously doesn't have nearly the same amount of personnel as an infantry battalion. Practically this means a brigade will have 36 self-propelled howitzers, usually 152mm and in the third, rocket artillery battalion there will be 18 BM-21 Grad or Tornado G 122mm MLRS.
LOL you're technically right but we don't know if that's the actual name of the role in the military. Man I wish I could find out, too bad I don't have the time to join the army.
It looks like it fulfils a similar role as the British Supacat All Terrain Mobility Platform. A light, all terrain platform primarily used by airborne units.
multiple variants packs much larger guns were developed from this platform for export purposes. there were MLRS, AA, 120mm howizer/mortar. Quite a potent vehicle.
@@kutter_ttl6786 Actually, that little thing is developed on the Supercat platform PLA imported them and made a few changes to make the vehicle fit their requirement
Your attention to detail, quality, ease of understanding/breaking down of topics of all your video subjects is both really educational and entertaining. The fact you only have about 20K subs is a crime. Keep up the awesome work 👏
@@MrBlueBurd0451 Yup! The prominent muzzle brake and carrying handle reminded me of the Denzel. Yet due to its massive barrel and large magazine, plus the rather industrial-looking buttstop, the grenade launcher presents a unique silhouette
Great video, I just hope East v West conflicts never get to the point of war. Both sides put the best people that their countries have to offer into their armed forces. The loss of human capital (i.e. lives) from war is irreplaceable because, paradoxically, the best people tend to die first. Hopefully we can keep it to war games, and flexing at each other on occasion.
Did anyone see that throw at 9:25? I had to rewatch it 4 times before I could accept that he threw that smoke 3ft. I'm surprised China hasn't censored that clip.
here is a deep misunderstanding about us think we are stubborn or something, but actually we are just normal people like anywhere else in the world, if you want, come here to find out exactly what we look like maybe you will change your mind.
In the most recent equipment update, all the QBZ-95-1 service rifles will be replaced by QBZ-191 assault rifle, carbine and SAW. They are also ditching the UCP, in favor of terrain specific camo, 8:06 is one of the new camo.
@@buckplug2423 To my knowledge QBZ-191 is supposed to replace QBZ-03(which never fielded in great numbers), intended more for the elite units, kinda like Army's HK416 or russian AN94. The qbz95a will still be the rifle for most regular units.
@@kevintang5473 Where did you get that? because QBZ-191 is intended to be the service rifle to replace QBZ-95. QBZ-03 was never intended for elite units, they were mostly used by border units. so to replace that with QBZ-191 doesn't make any sense. Also in the 2019 National Day parade it's made abundantly clear that QBZ-191 is being the next service rifle, since all the combat units were seen with them. oh and btw CCTV7 made a documentary stating that it was a service rifle.
@@obsidianstatue is QBZ191 the official designation? That's the name netizens came up with, I doubt they'd keep it. Irregardless, the new rifle looks amazing!
Amphibious Brigades have one and only one objective: be the spearhead leading the liberation of the Taiwan Island. Since EFV's cancel , PLA suddenly has the best AFV that can swim (type05s) CSK181, or Warrier Gen3 as is nick named is springing up everywhere, giving most mot.infs units whom have never been armored up an entry to AFV, also can equip a weapon station. There is CSZ181 that is a longer, 6x6 version, full armored or with a truck bed plus armored 4 seat cabin. Also air assault brigade (not marine)is forming now, but choppers are lacking to build more of them. QBU88 doesn't appear in normal squads THAT often, and optic is still hard to find on QBZ95 that often. Some units will have some modified T95 to ease the problem of not having a rail to mount optic, but it only comes in small amounts. PF98 120mm have a computerized optic to give more accuracy to the shots, but that shit is still too big in my opinion... 6:44 the AGL gunner should be 榴弹发射器手 8X8 Bobcat(山猫) got solid axle with no suspension (medic version excepted) so it can only be used for short range assault, not long marches. Also you may see a huge smoke cloud appears when a QBZ95 fired, that is from the plastic inert round used in war exercise. Normal ball ammo is just fine.
Also some ranting...some journalists working for PLA knows jack shit about military, and pictures may have mosaic on none-secret info for no reason. Edit dudes mixing material from years ago with no connection what so ever, confusion everyone...
I am so glad I found your channel as I find your content very interesting ,entertaining and you go over information that others fail to get to. I subscribed and get notifications of your new stuff, only channel that I find myself doing that with, as you control quality and maintain. Keep it up!
I was enjoying your content earlier today, but the fact that you went through the effort to put the Mandarin in this video while not taking it upon yourself to personally butcher the pronunciation has earned my follow. Keep up the great content
In a "strengthened infantry squad"， Besides the standard 95/95-1 automatic rifle and two 95/95-1 squad machine guns，it also equipped with two sniper rifles (including one Type 10 high-caliber sniper rifle), two Type 93 rocket launchers, Type 89 heavy machine gun, Type 98 anti-tank rocket launcher and Type 04 automatic grenade launcher. In addition, the squad is also supported with a professional sapper（pioneer）. This special squad is under command of the company and separated from other normal squads ， individuals in this squad can be deployed in any squad of the company due to battle missions. So there’s actually no variants in standard squads，they just got supported by a separated fire squad in their company.
jesus christ, that's a lot of firepower. Are there situations were such a squad is used as a unit, like for example in defence or during a company assault?
@@buckplug2423 the special squad is not used to fight as a normal squad，each member（s） of the special squad will be deployed to platoons or squads under the same company command. Such deploys will depends on battle missions of each platoon or squad. A platoon with anti-tank mission will likely be support by type 98 ATRL. A platoon with defense mission will likely be support by type 89 HMG，and so on. The special squad is directly under the command of the company commander，and its slowly expanded into a “firepower platoon ” after 2018.
Interesting! I find their IFVs and vehicle mix to be well thought out and compelling. The closest we could do is an MTLV based heavy / medium and amphibious structure, with Striker components as needed for occupation or operations other than war involving lots of road and plains movement. Light forces get M113 based heavy components with modernized Weasel M29C type light tracked vehicles and HMMWV and Jeeps as needed. Include Amphibious modifications packages and armor packages as appropriate, include the M113 vehicle family Cavalry vehicle we never used. Add EFOGM systems to supplement heavy mortars and missiles.
@@eee9034 Hey, ignorant. The 10.10 is the national day of Republic China, which commemorates the start of the Wuchang Uprising of 10 October 1911. When is the Taiwan National Day in your delusion?
I watch your videos a lot and this is the most useful video for my job specifically. If we can have more videos on the modern Chinese structure that would be very useful for studying as a grunt. Thanks and keep it up!
The similarities to the American Army Infantry are apparent. Its good to know how other countries organize their military. Most developed nations have mechanized brigades so the similarities are unsurprising.
It seems to be working for them, most Western countries usually try to take inspiration or copy tactics or doctrines from the US too (understandably, look at the most powerful current military and just see what they're doing right). It also differs from Russia who just seem still use their old Soviet doctrines and own Soviet era tanks and equipment despite being quite outdated especially now seeing it in action. China is just looking at what Western armies do well and just doing that.
@@user-qd3lc7zb6n well they've come a long way since even then. Besides their military seems to be growing more and more every year and they'll probably replace a lot of it anyway.
I’ve only recently discovered your channel, but have found it to be very well done and informative. If possible could you do a video covering the Warrant Officer in the US Military?
The PLAGF is switching out their QBZ-95 for the newer QBZ-191 which is heavily influenced by the M16. The 95 was deployed in 1997 and was basically the PLA admitting that the legacy 7.62x39mm rounds were no longer capable of servicing their needs (penetrating body armor) with its shift to their own 5.8x42mm rounds. The 95 came about because the Chinese leadership looked at what happened in the First Persian Gulf War and finally came to conclusion of modernizing the military. The thing about the PLA is that it has never had to use conscription for manpower so the entire force is voluntary and the closest thing to a stable job (or jobs). I mentioned earlier about the Chinese civil leadership not funding the military properly so the military was running its own businesses like hotel services or maintenance shops or restaurants or even farms. A sizeable portion of the original state-operated enterprises from before Deng Xiaoping (all the way back to Mao) were basically staffed by the PLA because they didn't have proper funding and you can kind of see the result of that with their little adventure in Vietnam in 1979. Once Deng Xiaoping came to power, one of the first problems he identified was funding, professionalism, and loyalty from the PLA and that has a lot to do with the PLA's commercial enterprises so he worked out a compromise with the PLA to fully fund the PLA in exchange for the military divesting completely from the aforementioned enterprises. The manpower reduction thing was a combination of reclassifying the enterprise-related staff as actual civilians, plus retirements, plus seriously getting new blood into the military's leadership so that the military would be more professional. Also, those enterprises were actually eating into a massive chunk of the PLA's budget in the first place and were also tying up resources that Deng wanted to use to focus on the economy. So the end result was that the PLA looked like its budget was slashed in the 1980s in order to rev up China's economy when the fact of the matter was that the PLA itself had a LOT of fat that got cut. So, how does that tie into the QBZ-95? Well, the Soviet Union imploded on itself, then the First Persian Gulf War happened, panic ensued in the CCP and PLA leaderships, and a plan was hammered out to prioritize the modernization of both the Air Force and Ground Force first. The fancy new Su-27s were always going to be expensive so it was decided that the new infantry weapon would need to be stupidly cheap and easy to mass produce while being as reliable as the AK-47 and potentially defeat opponents that had body armor. This is literally why the QBZ-95 came about. It was developed on a shoestring budget because priorities were elsewhere and there wasn't enough cash to go around. So for the next 20 years (the 1990s and 2000s), you had this merry-go-round of different branches getting priority on the budget which were always decided in 5-year intervals and during that time, the QBZ-95 was fully equipped in all service branches. The Ground Forces getting a serious operational, doctrinal, and tactical reorg kicking off around 2015 is basically 20 years from when the QBZ-95 started production (in 1995 obviously hence the name, but no one saw the new assault rifle until the Hong Kong handover in 1997). As part of the Ground Forces' reorg is a refit program in 2019 to make the PLAGF more in line with NATO tactics and doctrine which involved more emphasis on body armor, night vision, and fancy gun attachments. Basically refitting the infantry to be more like American infantry. Guess when the new QBZ-191 first entered service? 2019. Hence the name should really be QBZ-19-1. If a new infantry rifle comes out in 2095, it will likely be designated as QBZ-951.
There is no place else on RUclips where one can get this level, or just an honest intellectual attempt performed by investigators, as well as with historical background to support every point, no assumptions except where cited in big letters. Honest and toiling the material,
I think in the case of the Chinese they may be playing up the camera and making sure squads that get published in the media have one. For the Russians, they took DMRs out of the squads during the 2009 reforms. Generally speaking in American practice DMRs (7.62mm) are battalion assets but I believe they've been deployed to the squad before (even if it's just an M16 with an optic). The Marines want to put the M38 SDMR (5.56mm) in the squad though, but that's basically an M27 IAR receiver with a different optic and a suppressor
I would also assume the US doesn’t have a DMR specialist in every squad due to every rifleman having a similar capability due to their magnified optics. Chinese and Russian infantry almost exclusively use iron sights. I suspect the DMR man in some Chinese squads is an attempt to partially make up for the rest of the squad being unable to engage western (especially US) infantry at the same engagement distances.
The DMR is an answer to some common problems of large conscript armies with relatively low resources. The Russians and Chinese alike tend to expect their riflemen to be fighting without a lot of training or logistical support. So, they concentrate on training a few men to be extremely good shots rather than trying to train all their riflemen to be decent shots. It also gives them an ability to engage common threats, like machinegun nests, without resorting to logistically-expensive support weapons like artillery. The PLA rather likes the idea of Ping the DMR being able to knock out that machinegun nest with a few aimed rifle shots rather than Lin the Squad Lead ordering expensive rockets or mortar shells on it. Tsing the Rocketman is of course annoyed he doesn't get to lighten his load by firing his rockets sooner, but he is a a disciplined soldier and will not blow his load prematurely at the wrong time. Uncle Sam, when he goes to war, tends to be a little more generous. He gives his riflemen very accurate rifles, theoretically trains them to use those rifles well, gives them plenty of access to optics and other cool gadgets to help their aim, and he doesn't mind trucking in vast quantities of heavy weapons to blow the heck out of any enemy that is foolish enough to let him get the range on them. However, you will note that certain units, like the Marines, do want squad-level DMRs because they, too, want to be able to operate without all the heavy weapons that the Army traditionally enjoys. Why use your AT4 on that machinegun when you might run into a BMP? Of course, the average Marine will probably still use the AT4 on the machinegun, but at least they give lip service to the idea.
Could you do a video on the Section Organisation of around 10- 14 men in the Indian Armed Forces ? Information isn’t readily available online but a lot of folks on twitter can help you with that, would be interesting to see the Worlds Largest Armies and how they Operate.
Let PLA tell you what is CQB .jpg Well, the reason why the PLA doesn't attach the grenade launcher under the rifle because every man in the squad all bring a disposable rocket launcher -- the DZJ-08. Similar in status to the US army's AT4 but the DZJ-08 can launch indoors. Some pictures show that even the cookhouse squad also have it (to be honest I not sure of its authenticity). Quite cool when it launch have to say.
Good overview. Thanks! Question: From a command and control point of view, how independent are they at the squad level? Can they operate with some degree of independence or are they strictly tied to central command?
Historically PLA units were extreme flexible at the tactical level and place strong importance on independent maneuvers to outflank and destroy a superior enemy.
China still has a horse cavalry in certain parts where conventional vehicles can’t operate. It’s super interesting to watch a horse cavalry unit train in modern times.
China is already stronger and more influential than the US ...and don't forget to consider China was nothing just decades ago. They will continue rising with insane speed...it's true ...that dragon has been woken. What other countries should do is work on their domestic vitality and economy. The game is all money now, not military. Some people are very slow to realize this tho. Don't blame em, the west is warmongers and so are their citizens
Right now I'm pretty sure the USA would wipe out China in a conventional conflict, the US has heaps of real experience. In another 20+ year maybe things will be different
The amphibious brigades seem really interesting. Since they are the units most likely to face combat I pressume they are the best trained and equiped PLA force, right? Also fun fact the 124th amphibious brigade traces it's lineage to the 124th division, the first unit to cross the Yalu river in the Korean war.
I was a soldier at PLA and right now I’m a soldier at US army, I would like to share my personal experience with you about differences PLA and US army. Just let me know if you are interested.
Could you please compare the organization of US Army Combat Aviation Brigade Vs Chinese Army Aviation ones. So few coverage on the latter. And keep up the good works.
@@jeremysong7010 comparing two organisations and comparing warfare strategies are different things. Chinese Army Aviation Brigades maintains similar quantities and aircraft class as of US Army Combat Aviation Brigades, (PLAGFAF has 10 Avn Bde with about 1000 AC total) I don't think anyone else can come close, even the Russians!! Especially when you consider the growth rate of PLAGFAF .
Modern China not a conquerer, ie imperial/colonial power. Even when it won Indian or Korean War, it just sent home after by itself and unilaterally declared peace and the end of the war. Unlike USA who stayed in SK to this day. When you consider that NK was all but finished and Chinese lost hundreds of thousands of men defending North Korea, they had every right to stay and occupy North Korea to defend from SK/US/UN etc who ended up staying. Nuff said. Modern China is all about defence of the mainland, and maintaining territorial integrity, aka defence in China's pov. When China does expand, like building islands in SCS, that again is proactive defense, to counter USA containment and first island chain blockade. It's also an early warning system/honeypot, which USA will need to attack before they continue in to attack the mainland. So basically those islands serve the same role as North Korea, a buffer zone that pushes USA further away and extends China's defensive capabilities, like sensors/radars, SAM sites, etc etc. it's an un sinkable carrier and allows china to have forward operating base closer to the action, and plays it's part in helping China deploy its A2AD strategy, which again, is purely defensive and mainly against USA, but also against any anti China coalitions that wish to use gunboat diplomacy AGAIN, just like the 8 nations alliance did to China which caused China to suffer a century of humiliation and almost destroyed Chinese civilisation as a whole when the last dynasty collapsed, civil war kicked off, and Japan took advantage AGAIN(it was one of those 8 great powers which formed coalition to carve China up snd rob/rape/conquer/destroy China), but this time they invaded properly with intent to take ALL of China, which was a prelude to ww2(and turned into the eastern/pacific theatre). Fortunately Chinese civilisation and people/culture is strong and has withstood the test of time and history for a reason. Again, China has risen once more to the top as it always manages to do time and time again, even thought they were in a massive existential crisis and at the brink of destruction just 70-100 years ago. Ironically, Japan had also adopted Chinese culture and education, like Chinese writing, philosophy, technology, fashion, everything basically. Same as korea and many other Asian countries. Even the Mongols who DID manage to conquer all of China(and Middle East, Europe and most of the Eurasian continent etc) ended up being assimilated by Han Chinese civilisation instead of the other way around, the stronger civilisation and culture always assimilates the weaker. I mean the great Khan himself called his empire the Yuan Dynasty and was direct continuation of Chinese dynastic rule and timeline. He learned from Chinese technology and recruited Chinese engineers, who's siege warfare capabilities were decades ahead of the rest of the world.. Europe at this time and before was basically still "barbarians" and living in the "dark ages", while Chinese civilisation possessed technological marvels that Europe could only dream about stealing, which they had done so for centuries already and finally managed to "steal", aka learn over many years/decades/centuries through trade, spies, and actually stealing/conquest.. things like silk, ceramic/porcelain, tea, compass, paper, guns/gunpowder, rockets, etc etc. just like the Mongols learned/stole from Chinese and used Chinese siege tech to conquer, so did the Europeans when they used guns, gunpowder, compass, paper, etc to use gunboat diplomacy on China to force opium in her after China rightfully banned it's sale and consumption. I went on a tangent and ranted/wrote so much that now ive forgotten what the original point of this post was supposed to be about or what i was replying to. lol. either way china is strong and will always find a way to prosper and make their back to the top. usa and the west can try, but chinas rise is unstoppable. Napoleon was right, they should have left the dragon to sleep! Now the dragon is awake, and the world is obviously SHOOK. Lol.
Something interesting about PLA. Lack of PPE such as Body Armor and Eye and Ear Protection. Basic Ear Plug would suffice to protect hearing. No Eye Protection? Yeahhhhhhhhhh. Lack of Body Armor,Even simple Level III body armor. Such pointing out the obvious. Just my 2 cents
It is very likely that the Chinese will continue to develop and standardize their squads as production and training catches up with the modernization effort. For example, it may be intended or decided to put a Designated Marksman in each squad, but for now it has not been done because production and training doesn't allow for that yet. It's not just about producing the rifles, but also about sending the personnel through the required training, which in and of itself requires you to set up a training facility, train cadre, then cycle trainees through (while accounting for attrition due to promotions, re-specializations, injuries and soldiers leaving the service).
As a arm chair general, Is it just me or does this organization seem to fit exactly how you would set up a equipment table and unit organization in your head if you were putting together a army. It's so cohesive. I wonder what the weakness is.
As a fellow armchair general, the only weakness I can see is that it's untested. On paper, it should work, but know it depends upon the brass and how they are led.
@@strykertron232 one thing China has going for it is a unmatched pool of man power to run those tests on. Combined arms tactics are great and all but combined arms tactics that can spend untold amounts human life are better.
@@strykertron232 I think once they occupy a area coin makes sense. China's probably at point were they could preform air and land battle tactics at home. They can't really compete in space blue ocean sub surface or air with America. So after thinking out loud I can answer your question directly. I think this refit to China's current organization is leaning my towards a air and land battle style tactics we used in the 80s. Rapid development of escalating power forces while (in china's case) multi role fighter bombers and tactical missiles hitting rear Echelon targets. The two advantages I think China currently has to there strategy is man power and production capacity. How long do you think the USA could pour advance ordinance on China before we ran out? How long would it take for us to spool up capacity to build ordinance. We basically drop explosive unicorns out of more expensive unicorns that land on even more expensive giant floating unicorns which are flown by completely Irreplaceable flesh bag unicorns.
There is still a big gap between Chinese individual equipment and the US military, but last year the individual soldiers also installed the Beidou navigation and positioning system for communication and receiving wartime instructions and positioning. Each squad installed 3 fixed wings and 2 Spiral-wing UAVs and fixed-wing UAVs are used for one-off attacks, and spiral-wing UAVs are used for reconnaissance and communication.
Chinese military systems is highly influenced by the US army cuz the Gulf war made China realize that relying only population of the army was the way out. It’s the quality that become the determing factor in the future, so that Chinese military had many reforms.
They aren’t reorganized to duplicate American military but instead to achieve goals based on country and military offensive . In Indian border they are trying to train their troops to be mountain warriors , and cold weather frontier soldiers.
gotta say one thing that: PF-98A is actually not a handy recoil-less assault weapon. It has been criticized by the army for many years. It's hard to deploy and move while in high-intensity combat. The weight of the entire system can catch up with 2 RPG-7V2. In Chinese, we say "冲不上，展不开" about this system. But we don't have a better weapon like M3 MAWWS to replace it at present, and the replica RPG-7 is a bit weak while facing modern armored vehicles.
...THIS is why it is so important to keep the second amendment intact. The second Amendment is more of a deterrent than the US military. They match us in technology, they have a much larger military, but the amount of semi auto weapons in the US would create an insurgency that would be too hard to manage.
Far more of a deterrent is the oceans. It is logistically impossible to invade the US mainland and profit from it. The second amendment is an anti-tyranny precaution, not a deterrent against foreign aggression. Poorly disciplined schmucks with light weaponry are not unique to the US and feature in the defense forces of dozens of countries. Yamamoto never said shit about invading the US, his "behind every blade of grass" quote is fake.
@@josephahner3031 you are correct. But it also serves as a deterrent to invading forces. I have fought against insurgents and you have no clue where the attack is coming from. All you have is rumors.
i know there reasons not to but don't y'all think drum mags are kinda an advantage for the Chinese because box mags need to be belt feed and belt feed means more engineering witch adds weight just food for thought i guess they kinda get Nerfed by having Iron sights for rifle men
Throughout history, anytime a military has adopted a drum fed weapon, the next one almost always isn’t. Drums are heavy for the amount of ammo they carry, they’re cumbersome and expensive and hard to make reliable
Drum mags are unwieldy though and circles take up odd spaces, making them difficult to be stacked or attached in most locations. It's a minor performance difference that could make or break an army over time.
Other than the pf98a which designated rocket launcher operator held, Evey solider in the squadcan request for a pf89(or the newer type dzj08) rocket launcher. Making a total of 9 rocket launcher in a single squad.
As a side note, there is another squad organization floating around that's 10-men with 1 Squad Leader (with a UBGL), 1 Deputy Squad (with a UBGL) Leader, 2 SAW Gunners, and the remainder riflemen. However, I've only seen this in one place (and copy pasted from it elsewhere) with no supporting photos so it is not included in the video.
Ok yet would prefer u talk about the 21st century US Armed Forces squad from the Army to Marine Corp.
i can help with primary or secondary sources if you decide to do india
Peter Yim The US army squad is already covered in the from WW1 to Modern video.
Cameron Campbell Basically the Japanese in WW2 had three lmgs and three light mortars per platoon, with the light mortars concentrated in a weapon squad while each rifle squad received an lmg. Thus in Imperial Japanese infantry doctrine, mortars were king.
Happy Taiwan National Day
It’s absolutely mind blowing to see how much the Chinese military has modernized over the past few decades.
Not that amazing considering the fact theyve adopted a "steal everything that isnt nailed down" approach to technology, intellectual property, and ideas and what they cant steal/copy they buy. Combine that with the fact they realized having a massive land army didnt matter jack when they saw Iraqs massive but poorly trained and modestly equipped army get slaughtered in Desert Storm so they realized they needed to downsize relative to their population and that extra funding they saved allowed them to modernize and their growing economy also helped alot. The fact they want to become an imperial power again makes it all the more important to have a strong, more elite military similar to what the british did (large militaries make it almost impossible to have an over seas empire while a small elite force makes it easier)
@@arthas640 You do realize the NATO alliance including US practically outnumbered the Iraqis 8 to 1 in terms of manpower, vehicles, jets and naval assets used right?
The Iraq war was literally a group of 10+ advanced nations bullying Iraq.
@@arthas640 look the US military steals anything they dont have too. Its the only responsible thing to do. What do you want them to do? Risk their soldiers life just bc of moral concerns about “stealing” technology concepts?
@@arthas640 check out all the nazi war criminals pardoned by the USA and Soviet union for the sake of knowledge. Where do you think a big portion USA’s advanced tech came from
@@hitmanyang319 They did cover up many Nazi's but people tend to overstate how much tech the US and Soviets took. The US had the Nazis beat in many fields by the end of the war and really the only areas the Germans were ahead in were jets and rockets, both things the US was already developing on their own but that the Germans could improve. Other areas the Germans excelled at were mostly civilians fields, like physics, and many of those scientists moved to the US willingly because the Germany economy was devastated, the US had some of if not the best research facilities and universities in the world, and the US could pay more then anyone else.
People also tend to forget that the German aerospace industry was non existent after the war, it took years to even restart and decades to rebuild. Countries as far off as Argentina were hiring German engineers to start civilian aircraft industries or to refine their own domestic designs.
Basically the US and Soviets used the Germans to advance their aircraft and rocket designs but that was pretty much it. The other stuff they "took" was just to compare to what they'd developed themselves. The Germans were really struggling towards the end on R&D so their later tech was actually inferior to what the Soviets and Americans made on their own so the German versions were just a curiosity and not some brand new thing
Americans just have to accept that even though Chinese copy and imitate everything we do, that does not mean we should underestimate them or take it as a sign of weakness. They are basically hitting the fast forward button to catch up and potentially surpass the US Military and the only way to do that is to copy what works best.
It's honestly stupid to not copy from the best, especially in weapons development when survival takes precedence.
"Yes we should reinvent our tech so to not trigger the netizens"
It's not about copying, it's about reverse engineering. Just forget the process, the outcome counts.
Basically they get our gear with none of the R&D costs.
@@berettaxd7566 No you are wrong, don't take it too much for granted that everything is a sheer copy from you. Reverse engineering is a demanding job that very few of this world could do.
@@derrickchu8201 I heard Israelis sold you guys the plans for our F35. Is that true?
This channel is absolutely golden.
Glad you enjoy it!
Happy Taiwan National Day
Amen to that!
EE E LOL, not the best video to watch for that hahaha
@@emelyarye2641 what's better?
*I SEE THAT WARGAME RED DRAGON BACKGROUND MUSIC*
Cheeky bastards, I love you guys.
*RD closed beta PTSD intensifies*
@098765 Craper *MLRS dropping Mk84's on each rocket in closed beta intensifies*
@098765 Craper *Blind recon units intensifies*
@098765 Craper *Arty taking hours to receive fire coordinates intensifies*
@098765 Craper *Unicorn units created by Eugen intensifies*
I'm so glad I discovered an unbiased and highly informal explanation on Chinese military units thank you, notifications on.
@Ding Dong ?
@Lum inosity cool let's carry out a nuclear genocide on the United States
@@werther5757 good man
same
Did this comment really trigger some people? Pathetic
I would love to see Russian Motor Rifle again but at Regiment / Brigade and Division level, and the difference between Regiment and Brigade in Russia.
Happy Taiwan National Day
@@LongVu-lh9el Thanks
@@LongVu-lh9el You forgot about 2 Air defence battalions in both regiments and brigades (they have the same equipment iirc). First one is called an "AA artillery-missile battalion" and has 6 artillery-missile vehicles (2S6 Tunguska or ZSU-23-4 Shilka with Igla missiles) and a sub-unit with a number of hand-held AA missiles. The second one is an "AA missile battalion" with just 12 2K35 Strela-10 vehicles, to be replaced with 12 9M337 Sosna-R. Sometimes important units have a different air defence system here. For example a 39th separate motor rifle brigade based in Sakhalin is armed with 8 S-300V systems here. Some others may have 12 Tor-M1-2/M2 missile defence systems.
@@LongVu-lh9el What you described as a "122mm gun, towed or on BMP" is actually a 2S1 Gvozdika self-propelled gun. Towed D-30s are out of service in ground forces by now, they are only used for training, in VDV and Rosgvardia internal troops. There are also often 152mm self-propelled guns, like 2S3 and 2S19 in regiments instead of 2S1s, this used to be mostly in tank regiments, but nowadays it's also very common in rifles brigades, not sure about rifle regiments. It can be subject to change or variation though. There's also nuance, like motorized rifle regiments' tank battalions sometimes having 31 tanks (3 companies) instead of 41, like brigade tank battalions do. Also you're completely wrong about brigade artillery. They don't have "just one battalion" - they have, on paper, three. The Russian name for an artillery battalion is "дивизион", which obviously doesn't have nearly the same amount of personnel as an infantry battalion. Practically this means a brigade will have 36 self-propelled howitzers, usually 152mm and in the third, rocket artillery battalion there will be 18 BM-21 Grad or Tornado G 122mm MLRS.
you translated designated marksman to "godly shooter" which roughly means "pro 360 no-scope"
LOL you're technically right but we don't know if that's the actual name of the role in the military. Man I wish I could find out, too bad I don't have the time to join the army.
@@user-wb7ez9ud4p 你是从中国来的吗？
well in PLA, sharpshooter is translated into '精确射手', while '神射手' is honor to elite snipers.
Now that’s a pro gamer move
That was actually a commonly used term for sharpshooters (which also happen to be used synonymous with designated marksman in typical media)
8:20 that utility truck is adorable. Its like a chibi BTR-60!
It looks like it fulfils a similar role as the British Supacat All Terrain Mobility Platform. A light, all terrain platform primarily used by airborne units.
multiple variants packs much larger guns were developed from this platform for export purposes. there were MLRS, AA, 120mm howizer/mortar. Quite a potent vehicle.
@@kutter_ttl6786 Actually, that little thing is developed on the Supercat platform
PLA imported them and made a few changes to make the vehicle fit their requirement
@@shermanfirefly5410 I thought it was based on the Argo 8x8
you can actually mount a mortar on that thing, real fun
Awesome content. I think you’re the first person on the internet to introduce PLA squad compositions with such great details.
Only in English language .
Your attention to detail, quality, ease of understanding/breaking down of topics of all your video subjects is both really educational and entertaining. The fact you only have about 20K subs is a crime. Keep up the awesome work 👏
6:40 that auto grenade launcher looks like something out of Halo
If you think that's Halo google the QLB-06
@@BattleOrder Now THAT looks like something 343 would design for infinite!
@@jonseilim4321 If you think either of those are Halo, look up the Denel NTW-20.
@@MrBlueBurd0451 Yup! The prominent muzzle brake and carrying handle reminded me of the Denzel. Yet due to its massive barrel and large magazine, plus the rather industrial-looking buttstop, the grenade launcher presents a unique silhouette
Happy Taiwan National Day
Its all fun and games until
OF: Dragon Rising
Becomes reality
Lol!! More like a slithering lizard. Easy to squash.
@@andyboog2010 hahaha
@@andyboog2010 Grandpa knows better durning Korean war
@@jayjay53313 XD
@@jayjay53313 its an expression
great video!! Wish I could report on Chinese stuff :-(
Why is that?
@@BattleOrder why is what?
Why can't you report on Chinese stuff? lol
@@BattleOrder my job lol
@@_Matsimus_ law regarding secret? Or just ban on on book solider to report on foreign military as a principal?
Great video, I just hope East v West conflicts never get to the point of war. Both sides put the best people that their countries have to offer into their armed forces. The loss of human capital (i.e. lives) from war is irreplaceable because, paradoxically, the best people tend to die first. Hopefully we can keep it to war games, and flexing at each other on occasion.
Informative, unbiased, and nicely presented. Keep up the great work Battle Order!
Loving modern Squad breakdowns man. Hope you do more.
I love Wargame Red Dragon
I hope that Eugen Systems will make a "Modern" Wargame one day
Happy Taiwan National Day
Think the range of modern weapons make it a bit hard, and you know how sensitive people are these days to current conflict.
If you want modern day equipment feel free to download the ash and shadow mod.
Me too
Did anyone see that throw at 9:25? I had to rewatch it 4 times before I could accept that he threw that smoke 3ft. I'm surprised China hasn't censored that clip.
I think he accidentally hit the guy in front of him
Either they or he was somehow so bad it managed to go sideways
@@CoolKid-qk7tl I replayed the clip at half speed. It was a really bad throw! LoL!!!!
Damn. It was terrible.
here is a deep misunderstanding about us think we are stubborn or something, but actually we are just normal people like anywhere else in the world, if you want, come here to find out exactly what we look like maybe you will change your mind.
Probably while he was throwing his arm felt stiff which caused the throw to be very short.
In the most recent equipment update, all the QBZ-95-1 service rifles will be replaced by QBZ-191 assault rifle, carbine and SAW.
They are also ditching the UCP, in favor of terrain specific camo, 8:06 is one of the new camo.
Do you know why they ditched the bullpup?
@@buckplug2423 To my knowledge QBZ-191 is supposed to replace QBZ-03(which never fielded in great numbers), intended more for the elite units, kinda like Army's HK416 or russian AN94. The qbz95a will still be the rifle for most regular units.
@@kevintang5473 Where did you get that? because QBZ-191 is intended to be the service rifle to replace QBZ-95. QBZ-03 was never intended for elite units, they were mostly used by border units. so to replace that with QBZ-191 doesn't make any sense.
Also in the 2019 National Day parade it's made abundantly clear that QBZ-191 is being the next service rifle, since all the combat units were seen with them.
oh and btw CCTV7 made a documentary stating that it was a service rifle.
@@buckplug2423 bc qbz95 has limited modular capacity. optics, magnifier lasers and etc are useless on qbz95.
@@obsidianstatue is QBZ191 the official designation? That's the name netizens came up with, I doubt they'd keep it. Irregardless, the new rifle looks amazing!
I highly appreciate the unbiased video and the comments; thank you, everyone.
Finally! A channel which does a review on Chinese infantry. Subscribed for your great content!
Interesting breakdown, not a lot of solid info on their organizational structure so this is much appreciated.
Amphibious Brigades have one and only one objective: be the spearhead leading the liberation of the Taiwan Island. Since EFV's cancel , PLA suddenly has the best AFV that can swim (type05s)
CSK181, or Warrier Gen3 as is nick named is springing up everywhere, giving most mot.infs units whom have never been armored up an entry to AFV, also can equip a weapon station. There is CSZ181 that is a longer, 6x6 version, full armored or with a truck bed plus armored 4 seat cabin.
Also air assault brigade (not marine)is forming now, but choppers are lacking to build more of them.
QBU88 doesn't appear in normal squads THAT often, and optic is still hard to find on QBZ95 that often. Some units will have some modified T95 to ease the problem of not having a rail to mount optic, but it only comes in small amounts.
PF98 120mm have a computerized optic to give more accuracy to the shots, but that shit is still too big in my opinion...
6:44 the AGL gunner should be 榴弹发射器手
8X8 Bobcat(山猫) got solid axle with no suspension (medic version excepted) so it can only be used for short range assault, not long marches.
Also you may see a huge smoke cloud appears when a QBZ95 fired, that is from the plastic inert round used in war exercise. Normal ball ammo is just fine.
Also some ranting...some journalists working for PLA knows jack shit about military, and pictures may have mosaic on none-secret info for no reason. Edit dudes mixing material from years ago with no connection what so ever, confusion everyone...
I think you misspelled "the invasion of Taiwan"
I think you misspelled "introducing oppression and crimes against humanity"
@@XX-qo5ny #way to go ROC?
@@XX-qo5ny way to visit ROC
I am so glad I found your channel as I find your content very interesting ,entertaining and you go over information that others fail to get to. I subscribed and get notifications of your new stuff, only channel that I find myself doing that with, as you control quality and maintain. Keep it up!
Awesome!
Happy Taiwan National Day
@@eee9034 Taiwan national day? is that a thing?
love that the wargame soundtrack was chosen for this video. very appropriate.
My heart goes out to dude with the amazing throw at 9:26
I was enjoying your content earlier today, but the fact that you went through the effort to put the Mandarin in this video while not taking it upon yourself to personally butcher the pronunciation has earned my follow. Keep up the great content
In a "strengthened infantry squad"， Besides the standard 95/95-1 automatic rifle and two 95/95-1 squad machine guns，it also equipped with two sniper rifles (including one Type 10 high-caliber sniper rifle), two Type 93 rocket launchers, Type 89 heavy machine gun, Type 98 anti-tank rocket launcher and Type 04 automatic grenade launcher. In addition, the squad is also supported with a professional sapper（pioneer）.
This special squad is under command of the company and separated from other normal squads ， individuals in this squad can be deployed in any squad of the company due to battle missions. So there’s actually no variants in standard squads，they just got supported by a separated fire squad in their company.
Along with professional blasters do they also deploy phasers and photon torpedoes?
@@RustedCroaker I think blaster in this case refers to sappers or demolitions specialists, idk if the same terminology is used in western forces.
@@RustedCroaker yes，they also got Shuttlecraft with warp core as IFV XDDDDDD
jesus christ, that's a lot of firepower. Are there situations were such a squad is used as a unit, like for example in defence or during a company assault?
@@buckplug2423 the special squad is not used to fight as a normal squad，each member（s） of the special squad will be deployed to platoons or squads under the same company command. Such deploys will depends on battle missions of each platoon or squad. A platoon with anti-tank mission will likely be support by type 98 ATRL. A platoon with defense mission will likely be support by type 89 HMG，and so on. The special squad is directly under the command of the company commander，and its slowly expanded into a “firepower platoon ” after 2018.
Greatly helps my Arma 3 content. Thanks!
Was looking forward to this!
Happy Taiwan National Day
Must have been really difficult finding good sources for this oO
Just a few days of doing nothing by searching the Chinese internet lol
@@BattleOrder ok lol! Love your videos!
@@pyeitme508 Thanks mate!
Happy Taiwan National Day
@@BattleOrder your welcome
Good to see so many footages from CCTV-7 channel. There's no better place than CCTV-7 to know china's military.
Interesting! I find their IFVs and vehicle mix to be well thought out and compelling. The closest we could do is an MTLV based heavy / medium and amphibious structure, with Striker components as needed for occupation or operations other than war involving lots of road and plains movement. Light forces get M113 based heavy components with modernized Weasel M29C type light tracked vehicles and HMMWV and Jeeps as needed. Include Amphibious modifications packages and armor packages as appropriate, include the M113 vehicle family Cavalry vehicle we never used. Add EFOGM systems to supplement heavy mortars and missiles.
Happy Taiwan National Day
@@eee9034 Hey, ignorant. The 10.10 is the national day of Republic China, which commemorates the start of the Wuchang Uprising of 10 October 1911. When is the Taiwan National Day in your delusion?
keep the work up man! the past couple months have been great and this channel has insane amounts of potential. I love it
Oh man, Wargame European Escalation music gives me so much nostalgia for that game.
It's actually Red Dragon, not EE.
Happy Taiwan National Day
Red Dragon still has some activities though
I watch your videos a lot and this is the most useful video for my job specifically. If we can have more videos on the modern Chinese structure that would be very useful for studying as a grunt. Thanks and keep it up!
Happy Taiwan National Day
The similarities to the American Army Infantry are apparent. Its good to know how other countries organize their military. Most developed nations have mechanized brigades so the similarities are unsurprising.
It seems to be working for them, most Western countries usually try to take inspiration or copy tactics or doctrines from the US too (understandably, look at the most powerful current military and just see what they're doing right). It also differs from Russia who just seem still use their old Soviet doctrines and own Soviet era tanks and equipment despite being quite outdated especially now seeing it in action. China is just looking at what Western armies do well and just doing that.
@@orangeairsoft7292 I think the reason of why they still have so much outdated Soviet era gear is because their military reforms were made in 2008
@@user-qd3lc7zb6n well they've come a long way since even then. Besides their military seems to be growing more and more every year and they'll probably replace a lot of it anyway.
@@orangeairsoft7292 yeah, I hear about their new T-14 Armata tank and Su57
@@user-qd3lc7zb6n No, thats Russia. I was talking about China but Russia doesn't look like it'll have much for decades to come as of now.
Interesting organisation. Especailly the LCA-Brigade seems optimized for rapid foreign/internal intervention. And a very interesting video, of course.
I’ve only recently discovered your channel, but have found it to be very well done and informative. If possible could you do a video covering the Warrant Officer in the US Military?
Thanks man, I asked for this.
Happy Taiwan National Day
EE E more like happy taiwan provincial day lmao
I hear the Red Orchestra 1 main theme in here. nice touch, love our content man
A beautiful way to wake up
Not as beautiful as you bb
@@BattleOrder Smooth
Happy Taiwan National Day
The mounted infantry doctrine explains the transition from soviet arms to every weapon being a bullpub
The PLAGF is switching out their QBZ-95 for the newer QBZ-191 which is heavily influenced by the M16. The 95 was deployed in 1997 and was basically the PLA admitting that the legacy 7.62x39mm rounds were no longer capable of servicing their needs (penetrating body armor) with its shift to their own 5.8x42mm rounds. The 95 came about because the Chinese leadership looked at what happened in the First Persian Gulf War and finally came to conclusion of modernizing the military. The thing about the PLA is that it has never had to use conscription for manpower so the entire force is voluntary and the closest thing to a stable job (or jobs).
I mentioned earlier about the Chinese civil leadership not funding the military properly so the military was running its own businesses like hotel services or maintenance shops or restaurants or even farms. A sizeable portion of the original state-operated enterprises from before Deng Xiaoping (all the way back to Mao) were basically staffed by the PLA because they didn't have proper funding and you can kind of see the result of that with their little adventure in Vietnam in 1979. Once Deng Xiaoping came to power, one of the first problems he identified was funding, professionalism, and loyalty from the PLA and that has a lot to do with the PLA's commercial enterprises so he worked out a compromise with the PLA to fully fund the PLA in exchange for the military divesting completely from the aforementioned enterprises. The manpower reduction thing was a combination of reclassifying the enterprise-related staff as actual civilians, plus retirements, plus seriously getting new blood into the military's leadership so that the military would be more professional. Also, those enterprises were actually eating into a massive chunk of the PLA's budget in the first place and were also tying up resources that Deng wanted to use to focus on the economy. So the end result was that the PLA looked like its budget was slashed in the 1980s in order to rev up China's economy when the fact of the matter was that the PLA itself had a LOT of fat that got cut.
So, how does that tie into the QBZ-95? Well, the Soviet Union imploded on itself, then the First Persian Gulf War happened, panic ensued in the CCP and PLA leaderships, and a plan was hammered out to prioritize the modernization of both the Air Force and Ground Force first. The fancy new Su-27s were always going to be expensive so it was decided that the new infantry weapon would need to be stupidly cheap and easy to mass produce while being as reliable as the AK-47 and potentially defeat opponents that had body armor. This is literally why the QBZ-95 came about. It was developed on a shoestring budget because priorities were elsewhere and there wasn't enough cash to go around. So for the next 20 years (the 1990s and 2000s), you had this merry-go-round of different branches getting priority on the budget which were always decided in 5-year intervals and during that time, the QBZ-95 was fully equipped in all service branches.
The Ground Forces getting a serious operational, doctrinal, and tactical reorg kicking off around 2015 is basically 20 years from when the QBZ-95 started production (in 1995 obviously hence the name, but no one saw the new assault rifle until the Hong Kong handover in 1997). As part of the Ground Forces' reorg is a refit program in 2019 to make the PLAGF more in line with NATO tactics and doctrine which involved more emphasis on body armor, night vision, and fancy gun attachments. Basically refitting the infantry to be more like American infantry. Guess when the new QBZ-191 first entered service? 2019. Hence the name should really be QBZ-19-1. If a new infantry rifle comes out in 2095, it will likely be designated as QBZ-951.
QBZ-191 actually copy of Israeli Galil Ace
There is no place else on RUclips where one can get this level, or just an honest intellectual attempt performed by investigators, as well as with historical background to support every point, no assumptions except where cited in big letters. Honest and toiling the material,
yet you have comments that are like "this is bullshit propaganda"
I notice that the US doesn't have a DMR in seemingly every single squad like the Russians and Chinese seem to do.
I think in the case of the Chinese they may be playing up the camera and making sure squads that get published in the media have one. For the Russians, they took DMRs out of the squads during the 2009 reforms. Generally speaking in American practice DMRs (7.62mm) are battalion assets but I believe they've been deployed to the squad before (even if it's just an M16 with an optic). The Marines want to put the M38 SDMR (5.56mm) in the squad though, but that's basically an M27 IAR receiver with a different optic and a suppressor
I would also assume the US doesn’t have a DMR specialist in every squad due to every rifleman having a similar capability due to their magnified optics. Chinese and Russian infantry almost exclusively use iron sights. I suspect the DMR man in some Chinese squads is an attempt to partially make up for the rest of the squad being unable to engage western (especially US) infantry at the same engagement distances.
The DMR is an answer to some common problems of large conscript armies with relatively low resources. The Russians and Chinese alike tend to expect their riflemen to be fighting without a lot of training or logistical support. So, they concentrate on training a few men to be extremely good shots rather than trying to train all their riflemen to be decent shots. It also gives them an ability to engage common threats, like machinegun nests, without resorting to logistically-expensive support weapons like artillery. The PLA rather likes the idea of Ping the DMR being able to knock out that machinegun nest with a few aimed rifle shots rather than Lin the Squad Lead ordering expensive rockets or mortar shells on it. Tsing the Rocketman is of course annoyed he doesn't get to lighten his load by firing his rockets sooner, but he is a a disciplined soldier and will not blow his load prematurely at the wrong time.
Uncle Sam, when he goes to war, tends to be a little more generous. He gives his riflemen very accurate rifles, theoretically trains them to use those rifles well, gives them plenty of access to optics and other cool gadgets to help their aim, and he doesn't mind trucking in vast quantities of heavy weapons to blow the heck out of any enemy that is foolish enough to let him get the range on them. However, you will note that certain units, like the Marines, do want squad-level DMRs because they, too, want to be able to operate without all the heavy weapons that the Army traditionally enjoys. Why use your AT4 on that machinegun when you might run into a BMP? Of course, the average Marine will probably still use the AT4 on the machinegun, but at least they give lip service to the idea.
What do you need a DMR for when every Marine he is an excellent Rifleman
You should dig a little deeper into US DMRs...
The wargame soundtrack with this is nailed the vibe
This channel is a hidden gem that's starting to grow! Good job man and keep up the excellent videos
Happy Taiwan National Day
Hmmm this seems to be useful, It's also nice to see a comprehensive make up of their Mechanize Infantry.
@BattleOrder 在你的视频里有一个错误，火箭筒手是没有手枪的，在中国军队，每个人是一只“枪”，也就是占编制的武器，火箭筒的发射器也占编制，所以不会额外配发手枪，不过现在军队中基本都是用一次性的rpg，所以可重复用的火箭筒发射器逐渐淘汰。（其实是因为太重。🤣）
Could you do a video on the Section Organisation of around 10- 14 men in the Indian Armed Forces ? Information isn’t readily available online but a lot of folks on twitter can help you with that, would be interesting to see the Worlds Largest Armies and how they Operate.
Happy Taiwan National Day
All i can think about is that game Operation Flashpoint:Dragon Rising
very concise and clear visuals, narration! liked (and subbed)
Rule #1: Never get involved in a land war in Asia. (Update: continental Asia)
Add 'eurasia' for that
@@TheTeKuZa Technically yes, but I'm quoting Princess' Bride, inconceivable
Theyre all bark and no bite
@@Hannibalkakihara until bark isn't an option.
@@Hannibalkakihara Until we bite harder then we bark, you'll see
Sweet I was asking for something like this!
I really enjoy this channel!
Happy Taiwan National Day
I like the non bias commentary
Hey guys, this video was really good. Keep it up.
Love that wargame red dragon music.
I can't believe I just found your channel. This is great stuff!!
Is that the wargame: red dragon soundtrack in the back ground.
Damn right
That Red Dragon Soundtrack though...
Imagine next yeat Squad's "PanAsian" Deputy Squad Leader can put down building obj and also has a shovel... op
‘PanAsia’ lmao, what’s up with these stupid faction names?
@@marlarki5280 really lmao when I first saw the name. but it`s just temporary name, the official said
This is the first video I've seen from your channel. But it definitely won't be the last. This is great.
Let PLA tell you what is CQB .jpg
Well, the reason why the PLA doesn't attach the grenade launcher under the rifle because every man in the squad all bring a disposable rocket launcher -- the DZJ-08. Similar in status to the US army's AT4 but the DZJ-08 can launch indoors. Some pictures show that even the cookhouse squad also have it (to be honest I not sure of its authenticity). Quite cool when it launch have to say.
This is about to inspire some very spicy ARMA ops
Command and Conquer: Generals, Battlefield 2, and Battlefield 4 has become a reality
5:36
"Tank Hunter here!"
"I'm carrying the big gun!"
"China's rocket soldier!"
I was a light machine gunner and grenadier in the army, good times
Good overview. Thanks! Question: From a command and control point of view, how independent are they at the squad level? Can they operate with some degree of independence or are they strictly tied to central command?
Historically PLA units were extreme flexible at the tactical level and place strong importance on independent maneuvers to outflank and destroy a superior enemy.
@@dabo5078 Damn that is a scary thought. PLA with good training and weapons are a force to be reckoned with.
China still has a horse cavalry in certain parts where conventional vehicles can’t operate. It’s super interesting to watch a horse cavalry unit train in modern times.
Thank God, now I know what we’re gonna be up against.
@Philip Porcelli but getting stronger all the time, don't underestimate your foes.
China is already stronger and more influential than the US ...and don't forget to consider China was nothing just decades ago. They will continue rising with insane speed...it's true ...that dragon has been woken. What other countries should do is work on their domestic vitality and economy. The game is all money now, not military. Some people are very slow to realize this tho. Don't blame em, the west is warmongers and so are their citizens
Right now I'm pretty sure the USA would wipe out China in a conventional conflict, the US has heaps of real experience. In another 20+ year maybe things will be different
@Ti Klim it doesnt sound like you know much abt American politics
@Ti Klim *jewish led
and ya used the same back ground music as War Game, thanks i love it
Happy Taiwan National Day
The amphibious brigades seem really interesting. Since they are the units most likely to face combat I pressume they are the best trained and equiped PLA force, right? Also fun fact the 124th amphibious brigade traces it's lineage to the 124th division, the first unit to cross the Yalu river in the Korean war.
I was a soldier at PLA and right now I’m a soldier at US army, I would like to share my personal experience with you about differences PLA and US army. Just let me know if you are interested.
probably a fxing POG
Could you please compare the organization of US Army Combat Aviation Brigade Vs Chinese Army Aviation ones. So few coverage on the latter.
And keep up the good works.
it's hard to compare because US army is global strategy and China is still try to focus on the homeland defence
@@jeremysong7010 comparing two organisations and comparing warfare strategies are different things. Chinese Army Aviation Brigades maintains similar quantities and aircraft class as of US Army Combat Aviation Brigades, (PLAGFAF has 10 Avn Bde with about 1000 AC total) I don't think anyone else can come close, even the Russians!! Especially when you consider the growth rate of PLAGFAF .
Looking forward to more modern military organizational structure/tactics breakdown videos!
Can you please make an episode about Israeli infantry squads?
+1
Happy Taiwan National Day
Israelis prepare you're warcrime list
Soft.
please make more of these modern military analysis videos. 👍🏿 subbed.
戰忽局的同志們，請來此視頻下領取失業補貼。
Great video. This just reiterates my thought that getting rid of the Marine Corps M1’s was and is a terrible mistake.
Modern China not a conquerer, ie imperial/colonial power. Even when it won Indian or Korean War, it just sent home after by itself and unilaterally declared peace and the end of the war. Unlike USA who stayed in SK to this day. When you consider that NK was all but finished and Chinese lost hundreds of thousands of men defending North Korea, they had every right to stay and occupy North Korea to defend from SK/US/UN etc who ended up staying. Nuff said.
Modern China is all about defence of the mainland, and maintaining territorial integrity, aka defence in China's pov. When China does expand, like building islands in SCS, that again is proactive defense, to counter USA containment and first island chain blockade. It's also an early warning system/honeypot, which USA will need to attack before they continue in to attack the mainland.
So basically those islands serve the same role as North Korea, a buffer zone that pushes USA further away and extends China's defensive capabilities, like sensors/radars, SAM sites, etc etc. it's an un sinkable carrier and allows china to have forward operating base closer to the action, and plays it's part in helping China deploy its A2AD strategy, which again, is purely defensive and mainly against USA, but also against any anti China coalitions that wish to use gunboat diplomacy AGAIN, just like the 8 nations alliance did to China which caused China to suffer a century of humiliation and almost destroyed Chinese civilisation as a whole when the last dynasty collapsed, civil war kicked off, and Japan took advantage AGAIN(it was one of those 8 great powers which formed coalition to carve China up snd rob/rape/conquer/destroy China), but this time they invaded properly with intent to take ALL of China, which was a prelude to ww2(and turned into the eastern/pacific theatre).
Fortunately Chinese civilisation and people/culture is strong and has withstood the test of time and history for a reason. Again, China has risen once more to the top as it always manages to do time and time again, even thought they were in a massive existential crisis and at the brink of destruction just 70-100 years ago.
Ironically, Japan had also adopted Chinese culture and education, like Chinese writing, philosophy, technology, fashion, everything basically. Same as korea and many other Asian countries.
Even the Mongols who DID manage to conquer all of China(and Middle East, Europe and most of the Eurasian continent etc) ended up being assimilated by Han Chinese civilisation instead of the other way around, the stronger civilisation and culture always assimilates the weaker. I mean the great Khan himself called his empire the Yuan Dynasty and was direct continuation of Chinese dynastic rule and timeline. He learned from Chinese technology and recruited Chinese engineers, who's siege warfare capabilities were decades ahead of the rest of the world..
Europe at this time and before was basically still "barbarians" and living in the "dark ages", while Chinese civilisation possessed technological marvels that Europe could only dream about stealing, which they had done so for centuries already and finally managed to "steal", aka learn over many years/decades/centuries through trade, spies, and actually stealing/conquest.. things like silk, ceramic/porcelain, tea, compass, paper, guns/gunpowder, rockets, etc etc. just like the Mongols learned/stole from Chinese and used Chinese siege tech to conquer, so did the Europeans when they used guns, gunpowder, compass, paper, etc to use gunboat diplomacy on China to force opium in her after China rightfully banned it's sale and consumption.
I went on a tangent and ranted/wrote so much that now ive forgotten what the original point of this post was supposed to be about or what i was replying to. lol. either way china is strong and will always find a way to prosper and make their back to the top. usa and the west can try, but chinas rise is unstoppable.
Napoleon was right, they should have left the dragon to sleep! Now the dragon is awake, and the world is obviously SHOOK. Lol.
Something interesting about PLA. Lack of PPE such as Body Armor and Eye and Ear Protection. Basic Ear Plug would suffice to protect hearing. No Eye Protection? Yeahhhhhhhhhh. Lack of Body Armor,Even simple Level III body armor. Such pointing out the obvious. Just my 2 cents
Rich amount of information and dedicated！you just got a new subscriber！
From a PLA veteran. :)
It is very likely that the Chinese will continue to develop and standardize their squads as production and training catches up with the modernization effort. For example, it may be intended or decided to put a Designated Marksman in each squad, but for now it has not been done because production and training doesn't allow for that yet. It's not just about producing the rifles, but also about sending the personnel through the required training, which in and of itself requires you to set up a training facility, train cadre, then cycle trainees through (while accounting for attrition due to promotions, re-specializations, injuries and soldiers leaving the service).
As a arm chair general, Is it just me or does this organization seem to fit exactly how you would set up a equipment table and unit organization in your head if you were putting together a army.
It's so cohesive. I wonder what the weakness is.
As a fellow armchair general, the only weakness I can see is that it's untested. On paper, it should work, but know it depends upon the brass and how they are led.
@@strykertron232 one thing China has going for it is a unmatched pool of man power to run those tests on. Combined arms tactics are great and all but combined arms tactics that can spend untold amounts human life are better.
@@darkjill2007 so it would be like COIN ops with a soviet spin?
@@strykertron232 I think once they occupy a area coin makes sense. China's probably at point were they could preform air and land battle tactics at home. They can't really compete in space blue ocean sub surface or air with America. So after thinking out loud I can answer your question directly.
I think this refit to China's current organization is leaning my towards a air and land battle style tactics we used in the 80s. Rapid development of escalating power forces while (in china's case) multi role fighter bombers and tactical missiles hitting rear Echelon targets. The two advantages I think China currently has to there strategy is man power and production capacity. How long do you think the USA could pour advance ordinance on China before we ran out? How long would it take for us to spool up capacity to build ordinance. We basically drop explosive unicorns out of more expensive unicorns that land on even more expensive giant floating unicorns which are flown by completely Irreplaceable flesh bag unicorns.
I like that 8 wheeled buggy!
I’d love to see a video on AUSTRALIAN infantry formations
There is still a big gap between Chinese individual equipment and the US military, but last year the individual soldiers also installed the Beidou navigation and positioning system for communication and receiving wartime instructions and positioning. Each squad installed 3 fixed wings and 2 Spiral-wing UAVs and fixed-wing UAVs are used for one-off attacks, and spiral-wing UAVs are used for reconnaissance and communication.
Chinese military systems is highly influenced by the US army cuz the Gulf war made China realize that relying only population of the army was the way out. It’s the quality that become the determing factor in the future, so that Chinese military had many reforms.
你这说法太离谱了，17年的军改能扯海湾去。
They aren’t reorganized to duplicate American military but instead to achieve goals based on country and military offensive . In Indian border they are trying to train their troops to be mountain warriors , and cold weather frontier soldiers.
Do Modern USMC next please!
gotta say one thing that: PF-98A is actually not a handy recoil-less assault weapon. It has been criticized by the army for many years. It's hard to deploy and move while in high-intensity combat. The weight of the entire system can catch up with 2 RPG-7V2. In Chinese, we say "冲不上，展不开" about this system. But we don't have a better weapon like M3 MAWWS to replace it at present, and the replica RPG-7 is a bit weak while facing modern armored vehicles.
...THIS is why it is so important to keep the second amendment intact. The second Amendment is more of a deterrent than the US military. They match us in technology, they have a much larger military, but the amount of semi auto weapons in the US would create an insurgency that would be too hard to manage.
Far more of a deterrent is the oceans. It is logistically impossible to invade the US mainland and profit from it. The second amendment is an anti-tyranny precaution, not a deterrent against foreign aggression. Poorly disciplined schmucks with light weaponry are not unique to the US and feature in the defense forces of dozens of countries. Yamamoto never said shit about invading the US, his "behind every blade of grass" quote is fake.
@@josephahner3031 you are correct. But it also serves as a deterrent to invading forces. I have fought against insurgents and you have no clue where the attack is coming from. All you have is rumors.
The source is from - benning army mil - infantry magazine - issues - 2020 - Fall - pdf - 5_Arostegui-HIMOB
i know there reasons not to but don't y'all think drum mags are kinda an advantage for the Chinese because box mags need to be belt feed and belt feed means more engineering witch adds weight
just food for thought i guess they kinda get Nerfed by having Iron sights for rifle men
Throughout history, anytime a military has adopted a drum fed weapon, the next one almost always isn’t. Drums are heavy for the amount of ammo they carry, they’re cumbersome and expensive and hard to make reliable
Drum mags are unwieldy though and circles take up odd spaces, making them difficult to be stacked or attached in most locations. It's a minor performance difference that could make or break an army over time.
Funny thing is you are right. According to leaked photos, the new Chinese lmg that will replace the qbb 95 uses a belt instead of drum mags
Charles Xiong boom, soviets Germans British all did it, now the Chinese are too
Drums also rely on the spring in the magazine which can be unreliable in a machinegun or autorifle.
Hmmm I wonder what that amphibious combined arms brigade could be for 🤔
For TW
For getting absolutely mopped by the US lmao
can you do one on the british army. id love to see their organizational structure
Just look up the field manuals, it has all the info you’re looking for
Awesome video as always. But I really like the idea of a squad level automatic grenade launcher. It's like a one-man portable short ranged autocannon
The South Africans do a more tenable version (in terms of weight) with the MGL at section level. I believe they give it to their 2IC
Like every single Infantry squad is equipped with rocket launchers, calm down PLA this is not Company of Heroes 2
"We should all have rocket launchers! You get a rocket launcher, you get a rocket launcher, EVERYONE GETS ROCKET LAUNCHERS!"
Just in case they go to war against the USA or Russia in the future.
Haha rocket launcher go boom boom
Other than the pf98a which designated rocket launcher operator held, Evey solider in the squadcan request for a pf89(or the newer type dzj08) rocket launcher. Making a total of 9 rocket launcher in a single squad.