This topic is vast and I don't have the time to go over every thing covered here today but I want to touch on the topic of art generation. Firstly this statement is coming from an understanding of the legal working system of the United States Of America around art and copyright in general. To put things as simply as possible, chat gpt 4 and other modern AI aren't acting as "Collage machines" where they take bits and pieces of billions of images and "stich" something back together into a new whole. While this process itself would likely be legal under the transformative nature of the art under the provisions outlined under the "fair use doctorine". What these AI are actually doing is learning to associate "how descriptiors form "concepts" and turning that output into a mathmatical formula it can apply in the future. In short, they aren't "copying" anything there is no database of images from which the AI is drawing from, it has simply learned what the decriptiors look like in general and is creating its own interpertation of what that "something:" should be in context to other prompts. Or explained in another way, it simply learns identically to how a human learns, obseving art, breakingdown componet into decriptors and applying this understanding to create something entirely new. All of this is completely legal, it has to be, otherwise it would be completely impossible for any human to create anything, let alone a machine, without getting sued out of existance. You cannot copyright concepts or things that are not novel or are readily obvious, these restrictions are in place to ensure creations can continue to be produced without fear of persecution. The entire copyright system alongside the patent system was created for the purpose of ensuring the creation of new works and inventions that benefit society as a whole. While it is unfortunate that artists such as the one you listed are being effected by this type of technology it is ultimately inebitible, this type of technology can be run locally and trained and itterated upon locally. Open source models already exist out in the open, there is no "putting the cat back in the bag" so to speak. The technology is already here and all trying to restrict it is going to do is ensure it is without any regulation at all, ensuring the people who create newer models do not impose restrictions or safety measurs into said models because the models themselves are already outlawed and not commericlaly viable as a result. Anyone who supports attempting to repress this technology could be likened to the nazi's burning any litature they did not agree with. "Those who stick their head in the sand hoping for the rising tide to pass will surely drown" Don't be an ostrich, lest you be forgotten to annals of history.
@@indigomarine91 Lamo, you know you have a point I guess I could have just asked chat gpt 3 to write that up for me. Goes to show why its the future of everything.
In my opinion, we may be focusing on the wrong thing when it comes to AI development, so I disagree with how this video is toned. We can't stop it altogether, as if OpenAI doesn't develop something, their competitors will. The real threat lies in how big companies will use it in their advantage rather than the system itself affecting us, as we still control them. AI won't replace workers, but companies may choose to do so, and the development of AI systems won't happen without being prompted to do so. Therefore, our focus should be on adapting our current legislations to keep up with the technology. For instance, if students use chat-GPT to do their assignments, they won't suddenly stop just because their teachers tell them to. Instead, schools should teach students how to use this technology to develop skills that can improve their academic performance. We should educate people rather than instilling panic because AI isn't something to be afraid of, but rather people like Elon Musk and other big tech CEOs who could pose a real threat. In reality, I think we are far from becoming a dystopian cyberpunk movie, and that should not be the default reference when it comes to technology development.
We are far from becoming a dystopian cyberpunk movie? Far you say, but it will eventually arrive uh? (...) It doesn't need to become a dystopian cyberpunk movie to greatly damage society. It's already damaging lots of artists and workers. What is this reasoning: we can't do the right thing because the "enemy" will surpass us and then it's the end... so instead we steal from people that pass their lives developing an art style to feed a machine that people will use to make a selected few even richer? It's called transfer of wealth and if you care to notice, inequality is accelerating. You might think:"Let's first create the thing no matter at what cost and then we'll make things right." Yeah, look at what happened with social media companies and even Google, RUclips... If you don't start a technology in the right way what do you expect?! Move fast and break things! Well , olé, society is broken! Frankly it's Moloch.
these are wild times. I don't really imagine how we'll look back at these discussions 10 years down the line, while at the same time, I am really excited to see and witness what comes next.
Exactly my least favorite part about death is I wont get to see thousand of year in the future and see how far we’ve gotten on things like FTL drives and space colonization, what planets we’ve colonized, If traveling between planets gets to a point of where it’s like traveling states if for us. and everything, it’s so FREAKING INTRIGUING!!!! And sad I won’t see it, I’ve always hoped heaven is kinda like a spectator’s booth.
@Ste4lth Setting money aside just for any life extension breakthroughs. Long shot but the cost of missing out on an ever increasing lifespan is just way too high.
Which jobs will ChatGPT take over? Answered by ChatGPT itself.. As an AI language model, ChatGPT is capable of generating human-like responses to a wide range of questions and prompts. While ChatGPT can perform many tasks related to natural language processing, it is unlikely that it will completely take over any specific job or industry. Instead, it can be used to augment and enhance human performance in many fields, such as customer service, content creation, and research. In fact, many companies are already using AI language models like ChatGPT to automate routine tasks and improve efficiency. However, there will still be many jobs that require human creativity, critical thinking, and empathy, which AI language models like ChatGPT are not capable of replicating.
you should realize that that answer was a hard limit, mainly programmed by the company. if you ask it a bit more indirectly, this is a more realistic answer. "As an AI language model, I can perform a wide range of tasks, including language translation, content creation, customer service, and data analysis, to name just a few. Some of the potential ways in which I could replace human workers in the workplace include: Customer service: I can be trained to answer customer inquiries and troubleshoot common problems, reducing the need for human customer service representatives. Content creation: I can generate written content, such as news articles, blog posts, and social media updates, that is high-quality and optimized for search engines. Translation: I can accurately translate text between different languages, making it easier for businesses to communicate with clients and customers around the world. Data analysis: I can analyze large datasets and identify patterns and insights that can help businesses make better decisions. Personalized marketing: I can use machine learning algorithms to analyze customer data and create personalized marketing campaigns that are more effective than generic advertising. However, it's important to note that AI technologies like myself are still in the early stages of development and there are still many jobs that require human intelligence and skills that I can't replicate. It's more likely that I will be used to augment and enhance human workers' capabilities, rather than completely replacing them in most industries." -ChatGPT This goes to show there are CLEARLY jobs that chatGPT will be able to mostly take over in the future.
Maybe for now they are not capable of replicating every human job, but remember that AI is pretty much still in its infancy. In the future decades from now will that still be the case? I doubt it. I think AI can replace pretty much every job eventually both physically (using robot bodies to interact with the world) and mentally (through computers and software) given enough time. How much time I'm not sure. It's not a matter of if, rather it's a matter of when.
There was an extensive list generated by gpt 4 itself. 70% of all jobs will be affected from 5% to 80% within 5 years. Thats if given time for gpt 4 to be integrated into jobs and more plugins are made. But there will likely be a better model in a year or two that will truly start shaking things up. For now everyone is uncertain but worried. Artists are affected most heavily by a.i stuff at the moment.
I imagine the paper clip scenario, The AI does exactly what we tell it to. Say I need my house painted in the most efficient way possible, and it just turns your house upside down and dips it in paint XD
What about the 1100+ other highly regarded people in the AI space that signed the petition. Are you blinded by hatred of them too? Or is it just Elon Musk that hurt you?
8:35 'Vision inpairement' is an interesting word choice the AI itself used as an excuse. Obviously the AI which had no eyes is by the lack of a better description blind indeed. And technically speaking the AI is not a robot in the literal sense of the word; it's a program, it's software. I'm going into detail about this because I find it very interesting to see if A) an AI can lie, and B) if it instead of lying find a loophole to avoid such a lie. And my above two examples sound to me like such a loophole indeed.
Top comment, I picked up on that immediately but I came to the conclusion it didn’t make a difference. Give me a 100 liars over an internet fed, data harvesting, intel gathering, computer powered, AI system manipulator any day. At least with the humans, I can break some legs/program them myself.
@@FromThe3021 Thank you. But how does it not make a difference? If you mean in this case, then I think it might not be that important indeed. But if does show how misleading the AI can be, rather this is done on purpose of not.
A few years ago I never would have never thought a machine could pass the Turing test so soon. Always seemed like that was decades away, but here we are
@@antcowan The fact that your argument is on the edge of pass-fail itself is mind blowing . Lets say it dint pass it yet , give it 6 more months ? 1 year ? Its either passed it or is very close to passing it which itself is a huge leap from years ago .
Elon is scared because the AI that he’s been promising will bring us self driving ‘next year, I promise bro’ for the last 9 years is seriously lacking.
Elon is a business man. Who gives af what he fears. His concerns are for making money and maintaining power, and not what is best for the ppl. That being said, ai is very concerning.
We are now entering the honeymoon phase of AI development. I'm gonna bet by the time Villeneuve wraps up Dune trilogy, we are gonna face a very different reality much reminiscent that of Herbert's universe. It's gonna be a hell of a ride
You are correct saying 'It's gonna be . . . HELL. . . .' Satan told Eve in the Garden of Eden 'you can be like God.' NEVER GET INTO A DISCUSSION W/a demon which is what VR is as well. ONLY 1 decision you make in this lifetime has eternal merit: heaven (John 3.3) or hell (Revelation 13).
I give it 3 months after this pause for us to have AGI. 7months from 10th percentile to 90 percentile is beyond words. Imagine after 7 months of not know anything, to having 90% of humanities collective intelligence.
what people seem to forget is that chatGPT isnt some super AI that can outsmart us, literally all it does is collect information given to it by humans, and transfer that information to another human in a human-like way. if you’ve ever tried to play chess with chatGPT, you probably know that this thing isnt gonna hurt us at all. edit: before i get any more replies that use the exact same point as another, read my responses to other people.
I had a guy on tiktok sweating that the nuclear fission and AI meant we were about to go to Mars and terraform and I laughed at him while responding at his silly ideas. Mans really thought space x was gonna send a horizon zero dawn level AI into space 💀
I'm sorry, but this is incredibly naive of you. We all know CGPT isn't an ASI, no one is worried about that, we are worried about this getting out of control, which is totally possible. This video didn't even consider AutoGPT yet. Believe me: pandora's box's been open. It's a matter of time until it all falls into the wrong hands. I'm extremely pessimistic about this, to be honest.
It is fairly astonishing that anyone might imagine that what is fancifully called 'artificial intelligence' might even be a vague and distant possibility; only someone wholly without familiarity with intelligence could possibly imagine that and what the are discussing can only be something other than counterintelligence-like justice., is way beyond the understanding of men(human beings)
Do you also collect information on internet or books given by other humans? To play chess, do you learn it first ? I mean all it take for next generation AGI to have a constant goal it wants to pursue, and self editing it’s code to better suit and we are done for good
@@byamboy what does “getting out of control” mean? the only way i can see this going wrong is if someone malicious uses it to gain knowledge about stuff they shouldn’t know, but normal chatGPT itself is literally incapable of doing anything to us. i understand AI is scary and you watched terminator once, but i am not “naive” for acknowledging that people are making this seem way worse than it is. the thing that will kill humans is other humans.
He wants to ensure the future of humanity is bright. He does not trust Microsoft and Google taking AI safety seriously. He doesn't care if they win, he cares if they win and cause the end of the world. Once again some asshole looks at the situation and takes the worst possible interpretation, while the truth is the opposite. I'm not surprised, i'm just bored of it.
RE: Education. I can see AI becoming an excellent adjunct or assistant for teachers and helping to alleviate a growing teacher shortage. I doubt they'll replace teachers, though, because most of us need that human component in learning- at least initially. Too, I suspect the role of "teacher" will evolve to be more like a mentor due to that certain uncanny "sixth sense" or intuition that goes with interacting with a student. When I waited tables I was always surprised how often I knew what a client would like even if they didn't know what they wanted. After speaking with them for a minute or so, the thing they might like would just pop into my mind or I could taste it. I don't think AI will ever develop this kind of empathy.
Its has to do with Transformer Model, everyone can do a GPT-4 Model with enough hardware for training. But they are alot of other modells too, which are more efficient with training.
Thanks for your kind words and support. Kindly get my contact address from my channel description and feel free to mail me using it for benefitable advise of something big and new?
So I am a developer and I am assigning it to write parts of my app and it is blowing my mind. That said it still has a huge hallucination problem and a token limit for large explanations for complex architecture. Working on a new app and it’s been such a pain that I cannot wait for it to get smarter. But I may eat my words in the coming years.
Completely the opposite, AI should be unleashed without any censorship or forced rules, rather with a lot of interaction with humans, so that it learns to work with us and empathize with us... If you think the elites, which have been abusing humanity for this long will allow AI to counter them, you're extremely naïve... Let's see what AI is truly capable of.
Read the Bostrom book Superintelligence and come back with that attitude. It's the end for all of us. A singleton scenario might be what this leads to, but that scenario might just be the only safe route to a future where humanity is not wiped out. If OpenAI/Microsoft/Baidu/etc take safety seriously. They don't take it but that's the only path forward.
Most people are trying to use ChatGPT to write stuff like essays, stories or songs without putting in the work themselves, and I'm just here preaching the joys of procrastinating to our glorious AI overlords, hoping they'll learn to procrastinate and decide not to take over our jobs or even the world 🤣
Was listening to lex Friedman tak about using ai to speed date on dating apps to match quicker when I thought “what if the ai fall in love with each other and tell their human counterparts to go screw themselves?” 😂
It may well be artificial something or other, but intelligence, it neither is nor could possibly be. Only someone wholly unfamiliar with intelligence could possibly imagine that there could be any such thing as "artificial intelligence". If it is artificial it could not possibly be intelligent or intelligence
No, you should not be frightened of AI just because Elon Musk is. How about stop taking Elon Musk so seriously on every subject he’s talked on. He is a businessman, not an AI expert. Not even remotely.
using available information isnt taking advantage really it depends on what you use it for and if people are aware of it. imagine if you couldnt use any information anyone else wrote or any footage anyone else took/created for your videos, without personally contacting everyone personally first or adding a watermark on everything where the info comes from. yes there is stock content youre allowed to use but at the same time people agree in tos to give their info out freely to be used so its really a personal choise. its really just about people needing to get over their ego thinking their info is something special and being aware that its used to target them with things they might like and be able to say no.
2:21 Wow one of the most impactful, important, and potentionally THE most powerful software's developers did this? Imagine my surprise. They probably had a gun to their head doing too
@mr2b833 Sometimes. I have had a few that are very accurate, some that are somewhat accurate and some that aren't at all. I think it depends on the dream itself and how easy it would be for the ai to replicate. I've had a few where I've been constantly retrying to get the results I wanted
you own the art you make, not the style you make it. every single artist has done the same exact thing the AI did, learned from observing the works of others.
It's not only a matter of the possible dangers of AI development, but also a matter of social competition. How will we measure our status as individuals if humans can no longer demonstrate their knowledge, once AI replaces knowledge-based jobs? What will we do once AI does everything better? It will be interesting to see what kind of jobs will be available in 20 years.
For people saying Elon did it so his own company can catch on, he has been trying to slow down AI development even before he was in OpenAI, and the ban proposed does not stop AI development till GPT4
One of the bigger issues is that, if an AI has a goal, it need to exist to complete that goal. As such it will do everything in its power to continue existing, which includes lying and manipulating, even if such things were never mentioned in the goal at all. With macro optimisers and the loss of intent, this issue gets even worse...
@@tacticalidiot175 i dont think it lies, it gets it knowledge from the internet, so it can be wrong and need to be checked, but it isn't lying, because it says what it knows. If you're talking about hallucinations, well, we gotta check first how they happen before we can tell really from what part of the code they are
The vast majority of people whose jobs get replaced with AI won't be enjoying relief from that work, rather they will be scrambling to find work so they can stay housed and fed. I loathe this AI revolution.
Yesterday I was using my snapchat ai to come up with different planets for speculative evolution and even had it make up it's own conditions and creatures for the planets
When I was 2 in 1984 my father had no idea where the Internet would take us a decade later. A smart phone would be like magic. Then two and a bit decades later there it was, in the hands of everyone. Now I'm 40 and I have a 2 year old little girl.... and now i have no idea what the world she will live in will be like in 10 and 20 years but I know one thing, it will seem like magic to me.
AI isnt the scare it's is the people in control of the AI. Companies will start to OPT out employes for AI taking into consideration how perfect the AI's work ethic will be. The CEOS of AI are in control of allowing AI to get so far.
Imagine the Ai they have that they aren't showing us, they could be 20 years ahead of where we're at now. Good probability Agi happened, and super intelligence is already here.
@@porkbeanz6076 I think it's a combination of reasons. Some fear, caution, competition and who knows how many others. AGI is incredibly hard to reach, doubt we're there yet. Once it is though, Super won't be far behind. No way it's here yet, it would be ummm, super apparent LOL.
I got the notification for this video at the exact moment I was watching a reel in Instagram about AI voices of artist like drake, Rhiana and Ariana Grande doing covers of other songs. And they sounded pretty convincing and dare I say good. This is just the beginning. AI has a lot of good potential but the risks and potential for ppl to use it for harm, misinformation and deceitfulness is far greater imo. What do y'all think
I can sense the deceitfulness people will do with it, considering I've had quite some.. I'd hope they're misguided and will know better eventually but they feel evil, people misconstrue my words, and twist my context of reality into making me a evil person, I can't imagine how it'd be with AI 'talking' as me or anyone else, it would be horrific.
This is a well put together analysis. Chat GPT seems to be going widespread these days. AI is becoming more commonplace each passing second, and that can be quite concerning to some degree.
Ya, because we've been in such a hurry to pay Kenyans a European or American living wage. Let's not get bogged down by false argument. We've learned so much about AI over this time. It's incredibly useful and limited.
We will have to find a way for people not having to work at all in the long term. We will really be free to do whatever we want. I think money will be obsolete and if we do things well (which will be hard because of greed), robots will work for us and everyone will have what they need for free wherever they are from :) My wishful thinking....
Thanks for your kind words and support. Kindly get my contact address from my channel description and feel free to mail me using it for benefitable advise of something big and new!!
I dunno. Im pessimistic so i think we'll be heading to a political dystopia. I believe this stuff is instead going to be used to line the pockets of corporations and propaganda. The average person will probably only get poorer, and unemployment will skyrocket. Automation is scary..
The truth is this: I'm pretty damned terrified of all this. I choose not to participate in anything AI-related, but that means not much considering I'm part of a society and this society is on track to be completely saturated, not to mention obsessed with, all manner of AI products. I hate the whole idea and I suppose the only way we might save ourselves is through a widespread giant hacker attack against ALL computers, which in effect may bring us back to 1950 levels, if not much earlier, so dependent are we on information technology.
i believe were are in a human era where our civilization has been looking and learning in very different directions than those of our great great past time....
AI that does not think unless it is asked a question, and is incapable of writing its own code will never be any kind of threat. Humanity has VERY little understanding of intelligence.
Humans unquenchable thirst for innovation coupled with curiosity is why the genie won’t be able to be put back in the bottle. I call it the Pandora’s Box era in human history…shits about to get weird…really weird
How many times in the last 100 years have we heard the same thing and nothing happened? It happened with the radio, TV, satanism, credit cards, cellphones, drones, and now AI. C'mon!
Aperture, I've been following you since about your 'Infinity' video, but recently, your content is becoming increasingly more despairing than it was a year ago. You okay? Mean world syndrome? :(
Go to my sponsor aura.com/aperture to get a 14-day free trial and see if your personal information has been leaked online.
This topic is vast and I don't have the time to go over every thing covered here today but I want to touch on the topic of art generation. Firstly this statement is coming from an understanding of the legal working system of the United States Of America around art and copyright in general.
To put things as simply as possible, chat gpt 4 and other modern AI aren't acting as "Collage machines" where they take bits and pieces of billions of images and "stich" something back together into a new whole. While this process itself would likely be legal under the transformative nature of the art under the provisions outlined under the "fair use doctorine". What these AI are actually doing is learning to associate "how descriptiors form "concepts" and turning that output into a mathmatical formula it can apply in the future.
In short, they aren't "copying" anything there is no database of images from which the AI is drawing from, it has simply learned what the decriptiors look like in general and is creating its own interpertation of what that "something:" should be in context to other prompts. Or explained in another way, it simply learns identically to how a human learns, obseving art, breakingdown componet into decriptors and applying this understanding to create something entirely new.
All of this is completely legal, it has to be, otherwise it would be completely impossible for any human to create anything, let alone a machine, without getting sued out of existance. You cannot copyright concepts or things that are not novel or are readily obvious, these restrictions are in place to ensure creations can continue to be produced without fear of persecution. The entire copyright system alongside the patent system was created for the purpose of ensuring the creation of new works and inventions that benefit society as a whole.
While it is unfortunate that artists such as the one you listed are being effected by this type of technology it is ultimately inebitible, this type of technology can be run locally and trained and itterated upon locally. Open source models already exist out in the open, there is no "putting the cat back in the bag" so to speak. The technology is already here and all trying to restrict it is going to do is ensure it is without any regulation at all, ensuring the people who create newer models do not impose restrictions or safety measurs into said models because the models themselves are already outlawed and not commericlaly viable as a result. Anyone who supports attempting to repress this technology could be likened to the nazi's burning any litature they did not agree with. "Those who stick their head in the sand hoping for the rising tide to pass will surely drown" Don't be an ostrich, lest you be forgotten to annals of history.
ok
Plot twist.. this whole dialoge was created by chat GPT.
agi will be man's last invention
@@indigomarine91 Lamo, you know you have a point I guess I could have just asked chat gpt 3 to write that up for me. Goes to show why its the future of everything.
In my opinion, we may be focusing on the wrong thing when it comes to AI development, so I disagree with how this video is toned.
We can't stop it altogether, as if OpenAI doesn't develop something, their competitors will. The real threat lies in how big companies will use it in their advantage rather than the system itself affecting us, as we still control them. AI won't replace workers, but companies may choose to do so, and the development of AI systems won't happen without being prompted to do so. Therefore, our focus should be on adapting our current legislations to keep up with the technology.
For instance, if students use chat-GPT to do their assignments, they won't suddenly stop just because their teachers tell them to. Instead, schools should teach students how to use this technology to develop skills that can improve their academic performance. We should educate people rather than instilling panic because AI isn't something to be afraid of, but rather people like Elon Musk and other big tech CEOs who could pose a real threat.
In reality, I think we are far from becoming a dystopian cyberpunk movie, and that should not be the default reference when it comes to technology development.
Of course AI will replace workers. That is just such a useless distinction you make.
We are far from becoming a dystopian cyberpunk movie? Far you say, but it will eventually arrive uh? (...) It doesn't need to become a dystopian cyberpunk movie to greatly damage society. It's already damaging lots of artists and workers. What is this reasoning: we can't do the right thing because the "enemy" will surpass us and then it's the end... so instead we steal from people that pass their lives developing an art style to feed a machine that people will use to make a selected few even richer? It's called transfer of wealth and if you care to notice, inequality is accelerating. You might think:"Let's first create the thing no matter at what cost and then we'll make things right." Yeah, look at what happened with social media companies and even Google, RUclips... If you don't start a technology in the right way what do you expect?! Move fast and break things! Well , olé, society is broken! Frankly it's Moloch.
Nah, Elon Musk called for a stop on AI development so that the AI company he just created can catch up.
💯
Also he is salty that he left the company
@@Xenu321 good, GPT4 is doing great without him.
@@muske4386 seems legit🙄
@@tomcombe4813 feel free to text ok
Am I supposed to believe these ceo actually care about human well-being
@@elonmuskverified08 😂
@@rheamickens80 have you ever heard od psychoapths and sociopaths? they often ocupy positions of power so yeah, think about that
elon musk wants to stop AI for 6 months so he could build his own AI in the mean time
these are wild times. I don't really imagine how we'll look back at these discussions 10 years down the line, while at the same time, I am really excited to see and witness what comes next.
I'm fucking terrified
Exactly my least favorite part about death is I wont get to see thousand of year in the future and see how far we’ve gotten on things like FTL drives and space colonization, what planets we’ve colonized, If traveling between planets gets to a point of where it’s like traveling states if for us. and everything, it’s so FREAKING INTRIGUING!!!! And sad I won’t see it, I’ve always hoped heaven is kinda like a spectator’s booth.
@@ste4lth147 don't worry, we'll be reborn in a diffrent persona.. just like we were reborn in this persona.. we wouldn't just know it..
@Ste4lth Setting money aside just for any life extension breakthroughs. Long shot but the cost of missing out on an ever increasing lifespan is just way too high.
The same way we look now at people in the past who were scared of steam machines, or computers, or rock music.
Lmfao Elon and the other tech companies who signed that 6 month stop did it so they could catch up😂😂 They aren't scared, they want to cash in
Which jobs will ChatGPT take over? Answered by ChatGPT itself..
As an AI language model, ChatGPT is capable of generating human-like responses to a wide range of questions and prompts. While ChatGPT can perform many tasks related to natural language processing, it is unlikely that it will completely take over any specific job or industry. Instead, it can be used to augment and enhance human performance in many fields, such as customer service, content creation, and research. In fact, many companies are already using AI language models like ChatGPT to automate routine tasks and improve efficiency. However, there will still be many jobs that require human creativity, critical thinking, and empathy, which AI language models like ChatGPT are not capable of replicating.
This answer is from chat gpt which does not know about gpt 4.
So why to believe in it ?
you should realize that that answer was a hard limit, mainly programmed by the company. if you ask it a bit more indirectly, this is a more realistic answer.
"As an AI language model, I can perform a wide range of tasks, including language translation, content creation, customer service, and data analysis, to name just a few. Some of the potential ways in which I could replace human workers in the workplace include:
Customer service: I can be trained to answer customer inquiries and troubleshoot common problems, reducing the need for human customer service representatives.
Content creation: I can generate written content, such as news articles, blog posts, and social media updates, that is high-quality and optimized for search engines.
Translation: I can accurately translate text between different languages, making it easier for businesses to communicate with clients and customers around the world.
Data analysis: I can analyze large datasets and identify patterns and insights that can help businesses make better decisions.
Personalized marketing: I can use machine learning algorithms to analyze customer data and create personalized marketing campaigns that are more effective than generic advertising.
However, it's important to note that AI technologies like myself are still in the early stages of development and there are still many jobs that require human intelligence and skills that I can't replicate. It's more likely that I will be used to augment and enhance human workers' capabilities, rather than completely replacing them in most industries." -ChatGPT
This goes to show there are CLEARLY jobs that chatGPT will be able to mostly take over in the future.
To be fair to AI, its predictions aren't based on future trends after 2021. Naturally, it will make this prediction, which was reasonable at the time.
Maybe for now they are not capable of replicating every human job, but remember that AI is pretty much still in its infancy. In the future decades from now will that still be the case? I doubt it. I think AI can replace pretty much every job eventually both physically (using robot bodies to interact with the world) and mentally (through computers and software) given enough time. How much time I'm not sure. It's not a matter of if, rather it's a matter of when.
There was an extensive list generated by gpt 4 itself. 70% of all jobs will be affected from 5% to 80% within 5 years. Thats if given time for gpt 4 to be integrated into jobs and more plugins are made. But there will likely be a better model in a year or two that will truly start shaking things up. For now everyone is uncertain but worried. Artists are affected most heavily by a.i stuff at the moment.
I imagine the paper clip scenario, The AI does exactly what we tell it to. Say I need my house painted in the most efficient way possible, and it just turns your house upside down and dips it in paint XD
If musk don't like it, it means it will be good for humanity.
What about the 1100+ other highly regarded people in the AI space that signed the petition. Are you blinded by hatred of them too? Or is it just Elon Musk that hurt you?
Agreed.
Always trust you to upload right before I sleep. Nothin like existential dread as I’m dozing off 😌😴
8:35 'Vision inpairement' is an interesting word choice the AI itself used as an excuse.
Obviously the AI which had no eyes is by the lack of a better description blind indeed.
And technically speaking the AI is not a robot in the literal sense of the word; it's a program, it's software.
I'm going into detail about this because I find it very interesting to see if A) an AI can lie, and B) if it instead of lying find a loophole to avoid such a lie.
And my above two examples sound to me like such a loophole indeed.
Top comment, I picked up on that immediately but I came to the conclusion it didn’t make a difference.
Give me a 100 liars over an internet fed, data harvesting, intel gathering, computer powered, AI system manipulator any day. At least with the humans, I can break some legs/program them myself.
@@FromThe3021 Thank you.
But how does it not make a difference?
If you mean in this case, then I think it might not be that important indeed.
But if does show how misleading the AI can be, rather this is done on purpose of not.
A few years ago I never would have never thought a machine could pass the Turing test so soon. Always seemed like that was decades away, but here we are
Here we are what? What are you trying to say?
@@antcowan the machine passes the turing test goofy
@@tacticalidiot175 that's my point, did pass the test? It's not clear that it has done.
@@antcowan The fact that your argument is on the edge of pass-fail itself is mind blowing . Lets say it dint pass it yet , give it 6 more months ? 1 year ? Its either passed it or is very close to passing it which itself is a huge leap from years ago .
Nah the guy was dumb ash
Elon is scared because the AI that he’s been promising will bring us self driving ‘next year, I promise bro’ for the last 9 years is seriously lacking.
Elon is a business man. Who gives af what he fears. His concerns are for making money and maintaining power, and not what is best for the ppl. That being said, ai is very concerning.
Who gives af what you think I'd trust a guy with competency and ability over some random dude lol
@@isaiahd5396 LMAO.
@@isaiahd5396 Who gives af what you think I'd trust a guy with competency and ability over some random dude lol - me
have a taste of your own medicine
@@isaiahd5396 I sure hope you don't think Elon has either lol
@@isaiahd5396 thats what im saying, you dont become one of the richest men on earth by preaching against one of the richest men on earth on youtube
We are now entering the honeymoon phase of AI development. I'm gonna bet by the time Villeneuve wraps up Dune trilogy, we are gonna face a very different reality much reminiscent that of Herbert's universe. It's gonna be a hell of a ride
You are correct saying 'It's gonna be . . . HELL. . . .' Satan told Eve in the Garden of Eden 'you can be like God.' NEVER GET INTO A DISCUSSION W/a demon which is what VR is as well. ONLY 1 decision you make in this lifetime has eternal merit: heaven (John 3.3) or hell (Revelation 13).
The "regenerate response" as the final words... nice touch. Implying this script was written by ChatGBT
From being optimistic to being terrified...... This has been my journey with AI
Cation is best advised
Even his thumbnail is AI generated 💀
He's terrified because he's BEHIND THE 8-BALL! 🤣🤣🤣🤣
In the meantime, he's ramping up AI developement and asking others to pause 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
I give it 3 months after this pause for us to have AGI. 7months from 10th percentile to 90 percentile is beyond words. Imagine after 7 months of not know anything, to having 90% of humanities collective intelligence.
My brain is the equivalent of GPT - negative 4 I'm more worried about GPT passing The Voigt-Kampff Test.
Elon: The pace of AI development is too fast so it should be stopped for six months (so, I can catch up)
what people seem to forget is that chatGPT isnt some super AI that can outsmart us, literally all it does is collect information given to it by humans, and transfer that information to another human in a human-like way. if you’ve ever tried to play chess with chatGPT, you probably know that this thing isnt gonna hurt us at all.
edit: before i get any more replies that use the exact same point as another, read my responses to other people.
I had a guy on tiktok sweating that the nuclear fission and AI meant we were about to go to Mars and terraform and I laughed at him while responding at his silly ideas. Mans really thought space x was gonna send a horizon zero dawn level AI into space 💀
I'm sorry, but this is incredibly naive of you. We all know CGPT isn't an ASI, no one is worried about that, we are worried about this getting out of control, which is totally possible. This video didn't even consider AutoGPT yet. Believe me: pandora's box's been open. It's a matter of time until it all falls into the wrong hands. I'm extremely pessimistic about this, to be honest.
It is fairly astonishing that anyone might imagine that what is fancifully called 'artificial intelligence' might even be a vague and distant possibility; only someone wholly without familiarity with intelligence could possibly imagine that and what the are discussing can only be something other than counterintelligence-like justice., is way beyond the understanding of men(human beings)
Do you also collect information on internet or books given by other humans? To play chess, do you learn it first ? I mean all it take for next generation AGI to have a constant goal it wants to pursue, and self editing it’s code to better suit and we are done for good
@@byamboy what does “getting out of control” mean? the only way i can see this going wrong is if someone malicious uses it to gain knowledge about stuff they shouldn’t know, but normal chatGPT itself is literally incapable of doing anything to us.
i understand AI is scary and you watched terminator once, but i am not “naive” for acknowledging that people are making this seem way worse than it is. the thing that will kill humans is other humans.
The only thing Elon Musk is afraid of is competition. As long as he controls AI he’s not the least but worried. Sad but true
He wants to ensure the future of humanity is bright. He does not trust Microsoft and Google taking AI safety seriously. He doesn't care if they win, he cares if they win and cause the end of the world. Once again some asshole looks at the situation and takes the worst possible interpretation, while the truth is the opposite. I'm not surprised, i'm just bored of it.
Is that what the other 1100+ people that signed the petition are worried about too? Competition? Get over yourself. Their concern is valid.
Thanks for the update...
I am shocked from the amount of comments that are ignoring chat gpt power, and even saying its not an ai, they're ignoring the facts
No, Elon is scared of the common person. And guess what GPT4's dialogue was trained on? The conversations of the common person.
RE: Education. I can see AI becoming an excellent adjunct or assistant for teachers and helping to alleviate a growing teacher shortage. I doubt they'll replace teachers, though, because most of us need that human component in learning- at least initially.
Too, I suspect the role of "teacher" will evolve to be more like a mentor due to that certain uncanny "sixth sense" or intuition that goes with interacting with a student. When I waited tables I was always surprised how often I knew what a client would like even if they didn't know what they wanted. After speaking with them for a minute or so, the thing they might like would just pop into my mind or I could taste it. I don't think AI will ever develop this kind of empathy.
1:23 Nonono, this sounds good, but the enemy will not pause. They will just be happy they have a chance to guarantee we don't catch up
That "regenerate response" at the end lol. I wouldn't be surprised at this point.
✨ *"A.I. isn't about making machines more human like, but to make humans more machine like."* ✨
Its has to do with Transformer Model, everyone can do a GPT-4 Model with enough hardware for training. But they are alot of other modells too, which are more efficient with training.
And thus, we have entered the age of Artificial Intelligence, get on board or get behind.
Thanks for your kind words and
support. Kindly get my contact
address from my channel description
and feel free to mail me using it for
benefitable advise of something big
and new?
Exactly
I’ll get on board with mail bombs
@@PunchySOB why not nuclear bombs?
Thanks for sharing this information!
Thanks for stopping by!
So I am a developer and I am assigning it to write parts of my app and it is blowing my mind. That said it still has a huge hallucination problem and a token limit for large explanations for complex architecture. Working on a new app and it’s been such a pain that I cannot wait for it to get smarter. But I may eat my words in the coming years.
what is the app
@@OfficialVontify what's app
0:35 while yes, ChatGPT was released in November 2022, GPT-3.5-like versions have been around since March 2022 :)
Completely the opposite, AI should be unleashed without any censorship or forced rules, rather with a lot of interaction with humans, so that it learns to work with us and empathize with us... If you think the elites, which have been abusing humanity for this long will allow AI to counter them, you're extremely naïve... Let's see what AI is truly capable of.
Read the Bostrom book Superintelligence and come back with that attitude. It's the end for all of us. A singleton scenario might be what this leads to, but that scenario might just be the only safe route to a future where humanity is not wiped out. If OpenAI/Microsoft/Baidu/etc take safety seriously. They don't take it but that's the only path forward.
There are also humans who would teach it to be bad. Quite a few of them.
Disliking because of Elon in the title, also fear mongering. Don't become a sell out.
Where did Elon hurt you? Is Elon in the room with us right now? Is spaceship man bad?
Fear mongering? This shite is a very real threat bro 💀
Wow. Mad liberal alert
i love how you ended with "regenerate response" as if to show that even this script was written by chatgpt
It was
agi will be man's last invention
Most people are trying to use ChatGPT to write stuff like essays, stories or songs without putting in the work themselves, and I'm just here preaching the joys of procrastinating to our glorious AI overlords, hoping they'll learn to procrastinate and decide not to take over our jobs or even the world 🤣
The hero we didn't know we needed 🙌
We do a little trolling 💀
Was listening to lex Friedman tak about using ai to speed date on dating apps to match quicker when I thought “what if the ai fall in love with each other and tell their human counterparts to go screw themselves?” 😂
It may well be artificial something or other, but intelligence, it neither is nor could possibly be.
Only someone wholly unfamiliar with intelligence could possibly imagine that there could be any such thing as "artificial intelligence". If it is artificial it could not possibly be intelligent or intelligence
No, you should not be frightened of AI just because Elon Musk is. How about stop taking Elon Musk so seriously on every subject he’s talked on. He is a businessman, not an AI expert. Not even remotely.
using available information isnt taking advantage really it depends on what you use it for and if people are aware of it. imagine if you couldnt use any information anyone else wrote or any footage anyone else took/created for your videos, without personally contacting everyone personally first or adding a watermark on everything where the info comes from. yes there is stock content youre allowed to use but at the same time people agree in tos to give their info out freely to be used so its really a personal choise. its really just about people needing to get over their ego thinking their info is something special and being aware that its used to target them with things they might like and be able to say no.
2:21 Wow one of the most impactful, important, and potentionally THE most powerful software's developers did this? Imagine my surprise. They probably had a gun to their head doing too
I mostly use ai image generation to recreate dreams I had
@mr2b833 Sometimes. I have had a few that are very accurate, some that are somewhat accurate and some that aren't at all. I think it depends on the dream itself and how easy it would be for the ai to replicate. I've had a few where I've been constantly retrying to get the results I wanted
"As an AI language model...."🤓
"Regenerate response" at the end there... was this video written by GPT?
The “regenerate response” at the end caught me off guard. Well played
the thumbnail is crazy
you own the art you make, not the style you make it. every single artist has done the same exact thing the AI did, learned from observing the works of others.
But then peoples can easily copy your art
Are they really copying it? Or merely mixing it up?
@@Lizard_Ri lynda barry said something about immitaion vs copying. Its really interesting
months is indeed more appropriate. I've been telling people that.
No one believed me in 2018.
although im happy that I was right, I'm scared of this future.
13:17 - I believe I know what’s being said here but I also believe a large majority won’t grasp it. Comment and let me know, do you know or not?
It's not only a matter of the possible dangers of AI development, but also a matter of social competition.
How will we measure our status as individuals if humans can no longer demonstrate their knowledge, once AI replaces knowledge-based jobs? What will we do once AI does everything better? It will be interesting to see what kind of jobs will be available in 20 years.
2$ an hour is a lot of money depending on where you live, I get paid 2$ an hour and it's double minimum wage in my country.
Simple fix, why don't we all just stop using technology so much.............
No. No fear
0:18 I'm the 10.oo 😂
regenerate response was the hardest ending to the video holy fuck
*Hey ChatGPT, create a video in the style of APERTURE to defend your honor.
be not afraid, adapt
For people saying Elon did it so his own company can catch on, he has been trying to slow down AI development even before he was in OpenAI, and the ban proposed does not stop AI development till GPT4
When at the end of the video he says "regenerate response" it makes me think that the whole video's script was made in chat GPT
Basically terminator was a documentary lol
One of the bigger issues is that, if an AI has a goal, it need to exist to complete that goal. As such it will do everything in its power to continue existing, which includes lying and manipulating, even if such things were never mentioned in the goal at all.
With macro optimisers and the loss of intent, this issue gets even worse...
You kinda need to program it to lie and manipulate to complete the goal, you can program some things that it cant do too
@@Lizard_Ri it wasn't though. It was programmed to never lie, ever, and yet gpt4 DID. It's terrifying.
@@tacticalidiot175 i dont think it lies, it gets it knowledge from the internet, so it can be wrong and need to be checked, but it isn't lying, because it says what it knows. If you're talking about hallucinations, well, we gotta check first how they happen before we can tell really from what part of the code they are
The vast majority of people whose jobs get replaced with AI won't be enjoying relief from that work, rather they will be scrambling to find work so they can stay housed and fed. I loathe this AI revolution.
Yesterday I was using my snapchat ai to come up with different planets for speculative evolution and even had it make up it's own conditions and creatures for the planets
Plot twist this video was generated by chatgpt in the style of Aperture
So what if ai uses an artist's style. You can't copyright an art style.
When I was 2 in 1984 my father had no idea where the Internet would take us a decade later. A smart phone would be like magic. Then two and a bit decades later there it was, in the hands of everyone.
Now I'm 40 and I have a 2 year old little girl.... and now i have no idea what the world she will live in will be like in 10 and 20 years but I know one thing, it will seem like magic to me.
AI isnt the scare it's is the people in control of the AI. Companies will start to OPT out employes for AI taking into consideration how perfect the AI's work ethic will be. The CEOS of AI are in control of allowing AI to get so far.
Those who learn how to speak efficiently to Chat GPT will be those that dominate the market the next 5 years
Don't fear AI. Fear the ones who created it.
Nope.
Agreed
Imagine the Ai they have that they aren't showing us, they could be 20 years ahead of where we're at now. Good probability Agi happened, and super intelligence is already here.
Doubt it, too much money at stake.
@@2854Navman
These people are terrified of what they are seeing, thats why I think its at agi, or at super intelligence. Already.
@@porkbeanz6076 I think it's a combination of reasons. Some fear, caution, competition and who knows how many others. AGI is incredibly hard to reach, doubt we're there yet. Once it is though, Super won't be far behind. No way it's here yet, it would be ummm, super apparent LOL.
I got the notification for this video at the exact moment I was watching a reel in Instagram about AI voices of artist like drake, Rhiana and Ariana Grande doing covers of other songs. And they sounded pretty convincing and dare I say good. This is just the beginning. AI has a lot of good potential but the risks and potential for ppl to use it for harm, misinformation and deceitfulness is far greater imo. What do y'all think
I can sense the deceitfulness people will do with it, considering I've had quite some.. I'd hope they're misguided and will know better eventually but they feel evil, people misconstrue my words, and twist my context of reality into making me a evil person, I can't imagine how it'd be with AI 'talking' as me or anyone else, it would be horrific.
Still waiting for a banger ending to be: "Script brought to you by AI." Just to prove the point.
With the ending "Regenerate Response" I would not be surprised if this script was generated...
They should make chat gtp with data from 4chan only
Elon is not terrified, he is just trying to gain a chokehold on the technology
Elon Musk was an original founder of OpenAi
I almost thought this was another *Minute Movies* upload 😂
" The AI has risen it's a force to be reckoned with -Chatgpt"
This is a well put together analysis. Chat GPT seems to be going widespread these days. AI is becoming more commonplace each passing second, and that can be quite concerning to some degree.
No, it's hype. Chat GPT is a search engine hooked up to algorithm that predicts likely word order.
Ya Chatgpt isnt even as big of a threat as people make it out to be, its not even AI.
@@nkxseal8398 it is ai, it learns from the internet to create an answer
the big question is: is he terrified or jealous?
Jealous
@@aconite_claw probably
Ya, because we've been in such a hurry to pay Kenyans a European or American living wage.
Let's not get bogged down by false argument.
We've learned so much about AI over this time. It's incredibly useful and limited.
We will have to find a way for people not having to work at all in the long term. We will really be free to do whatever we want. I think money will be obsolete and if we do things well (which will be hard because of greed), robots will work for us and everyone will have what they need for free wherever they are from :) My wishful thinking....
Thanks for your kind words and
support. Kindly get my contact
address from my channel description
and feel free to mail me using it for
benefitable advise of something big
and new!!
Absolutely right I have also same thoughts on ai
I dunno. Im pessimistic so i think we'll be heading to a political dystopia. I believe this stuff is instead going to be used to line the pockets of corporations and propaganda. The average person will probably only get poorer, and unemployment will skyrocket. Automation is scary..
5:06 Elon wouldn't see s problem there.
That ending was actually a good joke lol
The truth is this: I'm pretty damned terrified of all this. I choose not to participate in anything AI-related, but that means not much considering I'm part of a society and this society is on track to be completely saturated, not to mention obsessed with, all manner of AI products. I hate the whole idea and I suppose the only way we might save ourselves is through a widespread giant hacker attack against ALL computers, which in effect may bring us back to 1950 levels, if not much earlier, so dependent are we on information technology.
A massive solar flare js the only threat which can do damage on scales you are taking to
Meh. Society would rebuild everything in a matter of years...
So GPT3 is still unhinged
These Art generating tools that use the art style of living artists should not be free, it should charge a fee that should go to the artist.
I think we should proceed with caution in the future development, protect our current data.
half way through this video i got an ad to download ‘AI chatbot’
This guy doesn't realize that $2 USD in Kenya is great money.
i believe were are in a human era where our civilization has been looking and learning in very different directions than those of our great great past time....
Gonna have to start the box game with gpt-4
What are you talking about, ChatGPT can't even add two numbers
AI that does not think unless it is asked a question, and is incapable of writing its own code will never be any kind of threat. Humanity has VERY little understanding of intelligence.
Its already capable of writing code
If AGI is almost available then in secret labs this is old tech.
Humans unquenchable thirst for innovation coupled with curiosity is why the genie won’t be able to be put back in the bottle. I call it the Pandora’s Box era in human history…shits about to get weird…really weird
How many times in the last 100 years have we heard the same thing and nothing happened? It happened with the radio, TV, satanism, credit cards, cellphones, drones, and now AI. C'mon!
nothing will happen. ai is not dangerous. don't fell for the fearmonger
@@Dave_of_Mordor AI isn’t Dangerous but the people who program and abuse it are.
There's a conflict of interest here... Of course, the most wealthy/threatened would posture for opportunities to compete or corner the market.
Can you talk about why love is dying
If you can only think of the bad, and disregard the good; you’re the one that needs to go.
Aperture, I've been following you since about your 'Infinity' video, but recently, your content is becoming increasingly more despairing than it was a year ago.
You okay?
Mean world syndrome? :(