"I am confident that the vast majority of Congress or the President don't have intention to invade our Dutch friends" but will do so if deemed necessary by all means
Donald Trump already tried to sanction the icc, which Biden reversed. I am confident America doesn't give a crap about the Netherlands, if it doesn't suite them.
Just like Israel attacked its 'greatest alle and friend' on june 8 1967 im International waters during Six Day War , almost singing US Navy Spy vessel USS LIBERTY, killing 33 unarmed personnel
It's meaningless when you have to rely on the "goodwill" and whim of whoever happens to be in office at the moment and whether they determine it is politically expedient to help out "patriots" even if they are war criminals.
🪒💰 DATA⏰💱 911: CONTACT YOUR GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES BY EMAIL, DEMAND THEY NULLIFY EMERGENCY NDAA ACT! DEMAND A RESPONSE IN WRITING! 🛠IF THEY DO NOT RESPOND, THEY ARE AGREEING TO YOUR DEMANDS 💧
You can clearly see, how much the USA respects us as Europeans. I am so glad, we have an ally like that, that protects us and sees us as an even partner on eye level.
Youre not a respectable partner. Your neighbor was invaded and it's US supplying them with the bulk of their weapons. We will pretend it's an equal partnership when you start producing enough artillery shells. Until you start having the balls to protect yourselves, we don't want to hear what is and isn't a war crime. We don't think it is therefore it's not. That's how international law works. It's based on treaty.
@martysmith5260 what strength america came to power after a devastating war in Europe and China has almost immediately became a super power america is weak with bunch of loud barking servile dogs protecting it speaking as an American
Yes america would attack netherlands. You can not say they have no intention on fighting netherlands but the law is there. if they have no intention then they must remove that nonsense law
the netherlands is still a member of NATO artikel 5 if ANY nato member is attacked ALL NATO members will react and most of them are also supporting the icc but it will never come to an action on the hague becouse what i see on the news in the US there are some smart people there without the red MAGA caps and more than one braincell who are good educated
what do you mean? we still supporting israel. there is no need for fear cause that support won't go away. the majority is still in favor of support so. i know that some foreign media is saying differently but it seems like they're doing it just for a good story. it's BS
@@Wall3Wapter not that I really who the US supports I just don't see the connection between your comment and and mine, I was talking about how Biden this said that the US will invade the Netherlands if his Israeli war criminals was arrested for .... well being war criminals which is funny coming from a country that is always trying to act as moral compass of the world
in practice, what it may mean is that the ICC members will be sanctioned, dutch embassy personell may get into trouble and be pressured to release the hypothetic prisoners, and worst case scenario, a spec ops team will try doing an extraction. But invasion? Invasion means war and occupying the capital city. For what? To get some servicemembers home who may not even survive the escalation that was started for them? Yeah, you don't have to be a law professor to tell the news guy that this is a load of BS. Invasion would also mean the netherlands, a nato member, has the right to trigger nato article 5. So the answer is: no, the US would not invade the netherlands unless youre a tinfoiI.
read about the The Hague act. they literally have a law that they can legally invade the netherlands if any of the US presidents or what ever get arrested.
So why would a politician create this law in the first place? Do we have a bunch of leaders paranoid about ICC tribunals and international law? It’s like they think the UN or other bodies are a boogeyman that the US should be worried about.
@@theamazinghippopotomonstro9942 since when did an invasion require occupying the entire country? An invasion could be 5 people entering with weapons and no visa
@@Eikonal_mThe war in Afghanistan was literally a revenge invasion against Bin Laden's terrorists. How's that a war crime? As for Syria, America was barely involved.
@@mardismardias2373 how is that a war crime? Are you dumb? Collective punishment, so punishing a group of people (in this case a whole country with a decently sized population) for the crimes of one person or group of people (the terrorists) is illegal under Geneva conventions and considered a warcrime. Countries don't just go invade countries whose citizens did terrorist attacks against them usually.
@@mardismardias2373 so your justifying that the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians because of osama even after they shot him a decade ago they stood there for another 10 years?. *barely involved* yeah america didn't have troops stationed in syria or help supporting and supplying rebels in syria. And we all know about about iraq.
someone already mentioned that with allies like this, no enemies are really needed. That is the sentiment all around europe yep. Europe isn't contractually obligated to defend genocides. Still the war criminals are gonna attack us if we arrest their friend, the war criminal. Aint no implication of guilt there.
@@vishnusurendran3301do you even realize how much more civilians Japan killed than the bombs? And what was the alternative if the bomb was never dropped ?
if you invade a nato member that means you are automatically out of nato.....and against all of nato...... will you try? it will be interesting to see how you do against all of europe(not just nato) simultaneously.
Perhaps good to remember: why the ICC is in the Netherlands. And that the USA is a former colony from The Netherlands and the UK. New york = New Amsterdam traded for Surinam somewhere in the 1600's if I remember correctly( dont shoot me on the exact date, more oil in Surinam) Also The Netherlands is technically the most advanced country in the world. America builds the weapons and the Dutch provide the software and computerchips. Through ASML. Also the system and techniques the USA runs to dominate world power by controlling all the sea-ways between continents. Including apartheid. And coming in to countries full force. And criminilizing any form of resistance against western worldpower is dealt with by using force. Is really just a technique which was invented by the dutch allready in 1600's. The Dutch are such a little country. With only 18 million people. For the Dutch using this technique was the only way to control the world. In the 1600's Usa and the Netherlands has been best friends for forever. Also there is nothing to invade. We dont have any military😂
The Netherlands has 1 of the best geopolitical placings on the globe. To get there you would first have to get past GB and Norway or GB, France and Belgium.That is assuming an attack from the east would be practically impossible because you would littarally conquer half the world. And attacking is obviously way harder than defending, look at Ukraine, Afghanistan, Gaza etc. It would proof espacially difficult boarding and controlling the biggest navy asset the European alliance has, called ''The Britain''. Who would also be easily able to take out incoming projectiles before they get even close to Dutch territory. Not to mention the political isolation the U.S would throw themselves in, it would be 1 of the proportions of Hitlers or Napoleon's demise and nothing tells me that Biden and his people wouldn't meet a similar faith. It would be the stupidest decision to make, and with no real benefit. Hope you never have a career where you have to make these decisions because the world wouldn't last another year.
The US needed help from NATO members to invade IRAQ and afganistan so that blink is only that shock and aw moment but on the long run it's not advisable
Well, the Dutch might not be considered our "friend" anymore if they decided to allow the ICC to prosecute an American. So, let's not ruin a good friendship, Netherlands. We'd hate to have to invade you.
How ignorant are you..? You'd be kicked out of NATO immediately and have to face countries like Germany, the UK, France, Poland, Sweden etc. all at once. Your bases in Europe would get arrested (destroyed if resist) and it would start WWIII. U.S. against Nato. Maybe Russia would support you, but that's a BIG maybe and they're not a big deal considering their current economy and obvious lack in military power. You wouldn't even get to the shore. Also, your neighbour Canada has close ties to France. So.. What makes think, you have any chance of inviting one of us..?
Hahahaha “technically true but requires context.” So it is true lol
The law is obviously awful, but the US would not invade the Netherlands if an American was charged with a war crime
Law is a system of technicalities. When it comes to law, "technically true" = true.
With friends like the Americans, we don't need enemies.
yes the us supports convicting russians but if an american commit's warcrimes in foreign country's it's a big NO NO.???
@@gernapgn Not surprised. The US has always been a country of hypocritical bullies, from its inception
"I am confident that the vast majority of Congress or the President don't have intention to invade our Dutch friends" but will do so if deemed necessary by all means
Donald Trump already tried to sanction the icc, which Biden reversed. I am confident America doesn't give a crap about the Netherlands, if it doesn't suite them.
But what that idiot fails to mention is Congress already consented by passing the law - the president alone has the authority to do it
if the maga senators go after the icc members, it wil have consequenses for those senators also
Just like Israel attacked its 'greatest alle and friend' on june 8 1967 im International waters during Six Day War , almost singing US Navy Spy vessel USS LIBERTY, killing 33 unarmed personnel
This aged like milk…
Why?
Is it because US double standard and hypocrisy right with Palestine-Israel and Ukraine-Russia.
@@eevee3168
They're going to do it for the Israelis lol
It's meaningless when you have to rely on the "goodwill" and whim of whoever happens to be in office at the moment and whether they determine it is politically expedient to help out "patriots" even if they are war criminals.
Technically true, but saying so would undermine us credibility and paint us in a bad light
🪒💰 DATA⏰💱 911: CONTACT YOUR GOVERNMENT REPRESENTATIVES BY EMAIL, DEMAND THEY NULLIFY EMERGENCY NDAA ACT! DEMAND A RESPONSE IN WRITING! 🛠IF THEY DO NOT RESPOND, THEY ARE AGREEING TO YOUR DEMANDS 💧
So what? Get rid of this law and Ratify the
Rome statute or gtfo. You can't just pretend this law doesn't exist by not talking about it.
Not much more to undermine at this point to be honest... :D
as if the Americans haven't already ruined their credibility
ASML is an dutch company with an option to remotely destroy All their machines for chip production in the US and other countries
If we don't intend to invade, why claim it? truth is that we can go and do anything we want in this world and no one can stop us.
Not anymore.try now to invade.
I mean gl.. pretty big portion of US material is in the netherlands.. including 1000 tanks and fighter jets.. believe even some stealth bombers.
You can clearly see, how much the USA respects us as Europeans. I am so glad, we have an ally like that, that protects us and sees us as an even partner on eye level.
Lol
So the US should withdraw from NATO and Ukraine then
Youre not a respectable partner. Your neighbor was invaded and it's US supplying them with the bulk of their weapons. We will pretend it's an equal partnership when you start producing enough artillery shells. Until you start having the balls to protect yourselves, we don't want to hear what is and isn't a war crime. We don't think it is therefore it's not. That's how international law works. It's based on treaty.
@genghiskhan5701 No wait! We want to make the rules and not bring home the bacon! Sorry Europe we wear the pants in this relationship.
😂😂😂
Short answer, yes
It says a lot, A LOT about any nation that feel they have to have an immunity against war crime charges. :D
The weak don't get to make rules for the strong. Get it?
@@martysmith5260so a bully at best 😂
@martysmith5260 what strength america came to power after a devastating war in Europe and China has almost immediately became a super power america is weak with bunch of loud barking servile dogs protecting it speaking as an American
It's because the tribunal doesn't have the awesome legal system of USA!1!1!1!
@@BioTheHuman yeah you can't even cycle through jury's and judges with money over there
Yes america would attack netherlands. You can not say they have no intention on fighting netherlands but the law is there. if they have no intention then they must remove that nonsense law
the netherlands is still a member of NATO artikel 5 if ANY nato member is attacked ALL NATO members will react and most of them are also supporting the icc but it will never come to an action on the hague becouse what i see on the news in the US there are some smart people there without the red MAGA caps and more than one braincell who are good educated
Aged Well
Now let's see what Biden does
2024: seems like they are now willing to harm their dutch friends for their Israeli friends
what do you mean? we still supporting israel. there is no need for fear cause that support won't go away. the majority is still in favor of support so. i know that some foreign media is saying differently but it seems like they're doing it just for a good story. it's BS
@@Wall3Wapter not that I really who the US supports I just don't see the connection between your comment and and mine, I was talking about how Biden this said that the US will invade the Netherlands if his Israeli war criminals was arrested for .... well being war criminals which is funny coming from a country that is always trying to act as moral compass of the world
in practice, what it may mean is that the ICC members will be sanctioned, dutch embassy personell may get into trouble and be pressured to release the hypothetic prisoners, and worst case scenario, a spec ops team will try doing an extraction. But invasion? Invasion means war and occupying the capital city. For what? To get some servicemembers home who may not even survive the escalation that was started for them? Yeah, you don't have to be a law professor to tell the news guy that this is a load of BS. Invasion would also mean the netherlands, a nato member, has the right to trigger nato article 5.
So the answer is: no, the US would not invade the netherlands unless youre a tinfoiI.
read about the The Hague act. they literally have a law that they can legally invade the netherlands if any of the US presidents or what ever get arrested.
You do know realise we are talking about the US. Which have started many wars, invading countries is their bread and butter.
@@metalvideos1961 Yes but the "invasion" would be an extraction like he said, not occupying the whole country
So why would a politician create this law in the first place? Do we have a bunch of leaders paranoid about ICC tribunals and international law?
It’s like they think the UN or other bodies are a boogeyman that the US should be worried about.
@@theamazinghippopotomonstro9942 since when did an invasion require occupying the entire country? An invasion could be 5 people entering with weapons and no visa
What? That doesn't make sense. I thought America respected and supported this international court.
Have you seen afghan Syria Iraq ? It’s okay for us to to commit war crimes but other countries can’t
@@Eikonal_mThe war in Afghanistan was literally a revenge invasion against Bin Laden's terrorists. How's that a war crime? As for Syria, America was barely involved.
@@mardismardias2373 how is that a war crime? Are you dumb? Collective punishment, so punishing a group of people (in this case a whole country with a decently sized population) for the crimes of one person or group of people (the terrorists) is illegal under Geneva conventions and considered a warcrime. Countries don't just go invade countries whose citizens did terrorist attacks against them usually.
@@mardismardias2373 bin laden lmao. He died long ago stop the cap you government cuck
@@mardismardias2373 so your justifying that the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians because of osama even after they shot him a decade ago they stood there for another 10 years?. *barely involved* yeah america didn't have troops stationed in syria or help supporting and supplying rebels in syria. And we all know about about iraq.
So, why does the law even exist to begin with if they are confident it will never be used? And why does the US even need such?
someone already mentioned that with allies like this, no enemies are really needed. That is the sentiment all around europe yep. Europe isn't contractually obligated to defend genocides. Still the war criminals are gonna attack us if we arrest their friend, the war criminal. Aint no implication of guilt there.
Wild Wild West Law! What else can one expect from there?
Nothing stopped them from using atom bomb .
are you insane
@@whaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat 🤝
@@vishnusurendran3301do you even realize how much more civilians Japan killed than the bombs? And what was the alternative if the bomb was never dropped ?
0:38 Technically true. You can end the video right there.
Are we actually going to see it with our own eyes?
if you invade a nato member that means you are automatically out of nato.....and against all of nato......
will you try? it will be interesting to see how you do against all of europe(not just nato) simultaneously.
Seriously this is happened in our generation. 🤣🤣🤣
Perhaps good to remember: why the ICC is in the Netherlands.
And that the USA is a former colony from The Netherlands and the UK.
New york = New Amsterdam traded for Surinam somewhere in the 1600's if I remember correctly( dont shoot me on the exact date, more oil in Surinam)
Also The Netherlands is technically the most advanced country in the world.
America builds the weapons and the Dutch provide the software and computerchips. Through ASML.
Also the system and techniques the USA runs to dominate world power by controlling all the sea-ways between continents. Including apartheid. And coming in to countries full force. And criminilizing any form of resistance against western worldpower is dealt with by using force. Is really just a technique which was invented by the dutch allready in 1600's. The Dutch are such a little country. With only 18 million people. For the Dutch using this technique was the only way to control the world. In the 1600's
Usa and the Netherlands has been best friends for forever. Also there is nothing to invade. We dont have any military😂
Wao! In a few years the tyrant will be called democrat and the democrat tyrant.
2:00 you are very wrong to that, of course USA can destroy Dutch in a blink
Aaaand get the whole European Union + possibly china, russia and iran on them on them
Nope.
Cant Land there, cant invade from the water.
Thats its, all the Plans of invasion already out the Window.
American delusion again. Keys without the E
The Netherlands has 1 of the best geopolitical placings on the globe. To get there you would first have to get past GB and Norway or GB, France and Belgium.That is assuming an attack from the east would be practically impossible because you would littarally conquer half the world. And attacking is obviously way harder than defending, look at Ukraine, Afghanistan, Gaza etc. It would proof espacially difficult boarding and controlling the biggest navy asset the European alliance has, called ''The Britain''. Who would also be easily able to take out incoming projectiles before they get even close to Dutch territory. Not to mention the political isolation the U.S would throw themselves in, it would be 1 of the proportions of Hitlers or Napoleon's demise and nothing tells me that Biden and his people wouldn't meet a similar faith. It would be the stupidest decision to make, and with no real benefit. Hope you never have a career where you have to make these decisions because the world wouldn't last another year.
The US needed help from NATO members to invade IRAQ and afganistan so that blink is only that shock and aw moment but on the long run it's not advisable
Short answer: We could. Whether we would is another story
Keys without the E stupid American
Very based laws
Well, the Dutch might not be considered our "friend" anymore if they decided to allow the ICC to prosecute an American. So, let's not ruin a good friendship, Netherlands. We'd hate to have to invade you.
If an american is a criminal, then they should be jailed for that. You arent exempt from the law
Sounds like the last drop to destroy a wobbly reputation.
How ignorant are you..?
You'd be kicked out of NATO immediately and have to face countries like Germany, the UK, France, Poland, Sweden etc. all at once.
Your bases in Europe would get arrested (destroyed if resist) and it would start WWIII.
U.S. against Nato.
Maybe Russia would support you, but that's a BIG maybe and they're not a big deal considering their current economy and obvious lack in military power.
You wouldn't even get to the shore.
Also, your neighbour Canada has close ties to France.
So..
What makes think, you have any chance of inviting one of us..?
So you admit America is a bully?
Propaganda
Which part? The actual law? If you want proof. Donald Trump already sanctioned icc, which Biden reversed.
It is true😂
wtf is this comment LOL