Boeing 737 MAX Crashes Immediately After Takeoff | Here's What Really Happened to Flight 610
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 22 май 2024
- Find out what really happened to the Boeing 737 MAX 8 operating Flight 610.
Check out my Official Shop with merchandise
• teespring.com/stores/thefligh...
Follow TheFlightChannel
• Instagram: / tfc_aviation
• Patreon: / theflightchannel
Business Enquiries
• Email: contact.theflightchannel@gmail.com
Buy the hardware that I use here:
• www.amazon.com/shop/influence...
Or Here:
CPU: amzn.to/2Y9yCSF or amzn.to/2LRbYfj
GPU (Graphic Card): amzn.to/2JnLrot or amzn.to/2PJuRAi
RAM: amzn.to/2V56KNr
MOTHERBOARD: amzn.to/2H3pY2p
Internal SSD: amzn.to/2VIGb55
4K MONITOR: amzn.to/2JgwZhL or amzn.to/2UZhDAp
MOUSE: amzn.to/2AxmXSE
KEYBOARD: amzn.to/2LpDqSw
Standard Hard Drive: amzn.to/2PN98rt
JOYSTICK: amzn.to/2LLMfVJ
This video has been recorded and edited in 4K resolution and 60FPS. 
Игры
Honestly, what blows my mind is how this aircraft was able to pass certification with ONE sensor controlling such a vital system on the aircraft. Furthermore, the fact Boeing-the largest aviation manufacturer in North America-decided to take the lazy route in designing an aircraft, is nothing short of negligent
It really is utterly incomprehensible that they wouldn't have some sort of redundancy on such a critical sensor.
Money talks boy
See my comment on scheduled Max flights in Asia and M. East in January.. Before any decisive had been made. Boeing should never have indicated that un-grounding would be a matter of a few months..
when a lightbulb costs more than a car.
Competition with airbus led boeing to cut too many corners with this aircraft. Now they have to spend even more money in lawsuits, redesign, recertification, loss of revenue, etc. Btw, boeing is not just the largest airplane manufacturer in North America. It’s the biggest in the world.
I'm a 70 year old retired professional pilot. Been through a lot in old decrepit aircraft. Whenever you have a manual or computer control problem, get it on the ground NOW! Figure it out ON THE GROUND! Many tragedies...Air Alaska & Air France 441 for two of many.
Alaska those polits were fucked no matter what
How. They had no altitude at points they were climbing. Altitude buys you time. As a Pilot do you want issues at 3,000 feet or 30,000 feet- you're dead anyway if you crash. Again I will say it Altitude buys time. If you can climb while your working it out, it's better than descending trying to work it out.. Computers are best serving us on the ground. RUclips search Qantas QF72. a near new Australian plane. Computers tried to kill them for the Hell of it, then look at QF32 single engine failure debris near killed them slicing wiring looms and hydraulics. I'd rather fly in a 727-400 anyday thats as old as me.
@Indio With respect, I wasn't aware of that. Thanks. I remember learning the controversy regarding emails from the technical pilot to B, management. How could this be allowed to continue?
Bill, that airplane should never have been returned to service without a test flight, given the severity of the control problems that manifested themselves on previous flights. This required far more than going through the troubleshooting tree in the AMM. I would have had the regional Boeing rep, in addition to myself as a principal engineer, troubleshooting the airplane on site. While I'm pissed as hell at Boeing, the airline shares a measure of responsibility.
@@damiangillett6443 I will take a 1947 Stinson with canvas wings and 100% manual controls. The only gages are altitude, slip/skid and artificial horizon. The trim is set manually. Watch a few youtube videos where pilots will shut off the engine and the prop stops (not pull to idle). These old timers could land the plane with a blindfold and one arm tied behind their back.
There was a serious incident with the plane just the day before and they STILL put people on it?!?! That blows my mind
Profits over lives. You know the drill!
Thats where I have so much appreciation for my time in Air Force aircraft maintenance. We had the ability to shut this stuff down. These civilian companies operate on $$$ for bodies being taken from point A to point B... We had people who would say NO...this thing is broke!
It wasn't a serious incident because that pilot knew the 12 memory items of the 737. Run away elevator trim is one of the 12 memory items you are absolutely required to know how to recognize and mitigate if you are to be a pilot of a 737. The pilot on the previous flight quickly recognized what was happening and just put his hand on the elevator trim wheel. That memory item has been present for 737s from the start. It is not unique to the Max.
Both crashes were because of incompetent pilots flying for banana republic air lines that didn't know the memory items for the type they were flying.
The attacks on Boeing are a witch hunt started by the Chicoms who saw a way to damage a US defense contractor by generating media out rage which eventually all the self righteous media will parrot and then ultimately elected government officials. Did Boeing need to improve the system, yes, but they didn't screw up as much as some of the AirBus fiascos. We don't live in a world where actual facts matter anymore, only peoples' feelings.
@@member5488 Boeing was found and admitted guilty. It was shitty programming which added to that crash. There are thousands of "incompetent pilots" flying daily and not crashing, the disaster needed also a shitty plane which is programmed to think it's better than it is in reality...
@@RDrumcajsek Just keep on buying the propaganda my fine man. A plane crashing because a pilot doesn't know a memory item is as bad as when they have a controlled flight into terrain because they didn't trust their instruments. When some bell end flies into a mountain in fog do they attack the aircraft builder? This is pretty much the only time in history that the blame has been placed on the aircraft builder after pilots failed memory items and it's all because of politics.
Airbus has had several instances where flaws in their programming contributed to hull losses, (Air France 447 for instance) and there was no international outcry because no world power decided to arrange one.
I think every pilot should immediately go back to the nearest airport when two displays show different altitudes, pitches, air speeds or similar
EXACTLY Jan!
@@billcallahan9303 I have sat in on some of these meetings in Renton, WA, as an airline mechanic. Fortunately my employer never purchased the MAX 8 planes. We do have about 20 of the 737-900 and 900ER's though with another 60 on order. I CAN tell you that there is a LOT of empty office space at the Boeing offices , A LOT! Some serious non-compliance was going down in that place and everyone involved was trying to distance themselves from it...
@@tima.478 Thanks Tim for that inside tip. My nephew was flying co-pilot on the MAX for AA. He never had a problem with it but didn't fly it long before they grounded it. He's been out since early April & just got called to return to work...over 6 months.
@@billcallahan9303 YW...AA may have had a couple of the Non-engineer modified ones, there weren't many out there though.
@Noangeltosin 5k feet is the safe fuel dump altitude... It will atomize into the atmosphere at this minimum height.
Terrain terrain..... pull up pull up.....
The most horrifying voice ever
I've got it as my ringtone, it really freaks people out!
@@Clissoldkid I want it
Clissoldkid lol I hope you turn your phone off when you fly!
Sanga Sasanka, maybe worse if your here the words YOU PASSED when in fact you should never have been in the left seat ever!!
I know right😭 The black box recordings are so sad...so eerie to hear the pilots last words and feelings...one pilot said goodnight, another said he loved his wife, some scream in panic ugh😰
This video is very personal to me. My bestfriend was there and six month before the accident she told me about this channel.
Wait really ? I feel bad for the lost :(
I am sorry for your loss ☹️ May she rest in peace ❤️
I'm sorry to read you lost your friend on this flight, but as long as you remember them, they will never be truly 'lost to you'. Bon chance Mon ami
Seriuss??? Jrng2 org cerita channel gini klo ga hoby aviation
I hope she's ok In heaven 🙏
One thing missing in this video is that the captain actually request to RTB (Return to base) but they never made it
was their anything hte pilots could have done to avoid crash
@@randomrazr system reset while using only hydraulics. System override. They could have kept flaps at a constant 15° and leveled. Likely the landing would had been disastrous given the plane forced itself down at almost all times
System override...manual controls....flaps at 15...do everything you can to keep nose up on landing high without smashing rear....pray
@@Bradlalb123 easy to say when you already knew what the problem is.
@gargy2002 I agree ....you are completely correct.
Pilot and Crews : Let's have a normal flight.
MCAS : Nope. Not a chance.
Teacher: Name words that terrify you
Class: Ghosts, Death, Guts, Blood
Me: *Pull Up, Terrain, Stall, Banking*
These words terrify me every day
Also we have “Landing Gear”. This happens when the landing gear is not out while landing
If ya shake the STICK.. Id prob crap my pants.
WELP...
WE GOIN BACK!
Also...MCAS. The most terrifying as it was practically made to crash.
TCAS: Descend Descend!
He should've listened to the First Officer when he suggested to go back
Ive flewn with lion air the food was awesome and all that but the fcked up thing was i flew with the 737max
@@dontstalkme9868 Glad you're safe
Yes, poor CRM of the pilots
Both of pilot must be verified the problem first and then decide,the most important is *fly the aircraft* first,i think they already decide rtb,but how?if airplane unable to control,it's so difficult,that's why they try establish that aircraft
Syawash Etemadi Yup
The only pilot error was not turning back and making an emergency landing as soon as the plane got a mind of its own and thought it was a Stuka dive bomber.
what you people seem to miss is that the mcas activated soon after take off and at very low altitude, and at that point the pilot are basically fighting with the plane,trying to figure out what's going on and probably hearing multiple alarms. the fault lies in mcas system operating on a single sensor input
The Ju87 Stuka actually had an automated system to pull the plane OUT OF THE DIVE. Not one to put in into a dive. 1930s....make Engineering great again
Yeah.. You are 100% right..
You have 10 fvckin seconds to maneuver and recover if the MCAS fails. And there's no way to recover after the 10 second mark.
10 fvckin seconds, dvmbass. And it was on Boeing's confidential documents And yet, they smirked and said, naaaah that's ok. MCAS wont fail anyway. Sh1theads.
@@Dilley_G45 Inverse of MCAS it seems.
Still remember that morning. I just flew in to Medan, Indonesia for vacation and the next morning I was watching the news of the tragic crash on TV at the hotel. What’s more disturbing is my boss she boarded on Singapore airlines that morning right next to that Lion Air. I am so saddened for the loss of the families 😔
I'm an engineer that has worked in automation all my life. I would bet everything I own that there are many engineers/technicians at Boeing that raised objections to the lack of MCAS failsafes. This was the root problem. It doesn't matter how shitty the design was in the first place if the proper failsafes were in place. For example, it depended on one AOA indicator. Had it looked at both and saw a disagreement, it should have disabled itself. The idea it relied on one sensor is a joke and there is nobody except upper management who would agree with that design. If the MCAS detected countering movements by the pilot or f/o, it should have disabled. Had it looked at both altimeters and saw a disagreement, disable. The list is endless. There are objections in writing somewhere - digital fingerprints. They need to be made public.
Mike Bevan 100% correct. But remember. There is a memory checklist for a runaway trim. Step 1. Turn off MCAS. Same as there is a memory check list for engine failure, hydraulic failure. Etc. that should have had the same effect as auto shut off. Problem would be to manual trim thereafter at speed. See the ET preliminary report. If N1 was 96% no pilot will ever be able to manual trim. The memory checklist also calls for throttle back. ET was at takeoff throttle the entire flight. Sad. But in most crashes multiple failures need to be in sync for a crash to happen. Remember as well there have been multiple mCAS fails. Two resulted in crashes.
Tony de la Motte the thing is they weren’t properly trained about the Mcas. Only like a 2 hour course on an iPad. So they did not know how to disable it. If they had they would have probably survived
@@PlenthAviation the "2 hour course on an iPad" was remarkably inexpensive for Boeing. And now they want a $50B bailout.
Reminds me of the space shuttle o-ring fiasco. Such a preventable tragedy. 😢😠
@@PlenthAviation, true. It was treated as an afterthought. There is no doubt that when the design engineers created this workaround(which is basically what it is) when they discovered how bad the center of gravity shift, it was much simpler. Otherwise, I doubt they would have even considered it. But when that design was reviewed by management, mission creep took over. It always does. Somebody, somewhere started the "We can't use this because on Tuesdays, we lift our left foot up and turn it all about. This design does not accommodate that". Two holes in the ground later, none of them had anything to do with it. This was an epic failure fully documented somewhere.
I cant imagine the horror in Captain and F/O eyes when the plane diving straight to the sea
Kyra WS I think about the passengers who must have been terrified.
All that nose down and then up must’ve taken its toll on both crew and passengers,must’ve been terrified,MAY THEY ALL RESTIN PEACE
I don't know what would be worse. Being in the cockpit and seeing the ground getting closer or being a passenger and not exactly knowing how close it is
@@deanwinchester7649 The passengers probably thought the captain had a death wish OR that there was a struggle with the controls. I'm sure they had no idea it was the computer.
I think about the passengers and crew, imagine being in an aircraft that just goes up, down, up, then does a complete nose dive. Rest In Peace to all the people on that flight.
I have to imagine those passengers were aware there was something terrible wrong during that 5 or so minute roller coaster ride from Hell. It's awful. RIP all souls lost.
Sad !!! ... I cannot even begin to imagine the terror those passengers felt when they realized the obvious.
The horror those passengers suffered from the moment it took off going up and down like a rollercoaster, clearly aware something was wrong.
Even if you close your eyes, you brain "sensor" can feel it. I was so nervous during a turn around landing a couple days back, these both CRIMES traumatized me.
Amazing how the FAA is still pointing fingers away from themselves. They are supposed to be the responsible ones with the authority to approve or disapprove things like MCAS.
The problem is much deeper rooted. Management background is required to explain it.
@@aabb-zz9uw Care to explain? FAA management/mismanagement?
@@patrickcowle639 Stop trying to make it someone else's fault when it really is the fault of the airlines. This plane had so many issues, I cannot understand why Lion Air maintenance put it back into service. It's their responsibility to ensure all of the avionics are tested, and working correctly before putting it back into service. To me, this all looks very suspicious. I can't believe they are so incompetent. Something tells me this was sabotage. 38 Civil Servants on board. Hmm.. www.airlineratings.com/news/highly-respected-aviation-experts-critical-lion-air-pilots-crash-report/
If they did that, they would have to pull the certificate on every single Boeing and Airbus jet flying today. Any of them can have a stab trim runaway, and a stab trim runaway is what an MCAS error causes.
realy worrying
How can they blame the pilots when of losing focus they were overwhelmed by cockpit alerts with the majority being of false readings and erroneous pitch downs? The FAA is extremely corrupt sometimes.
Corrupt and incompetent
Corruption never pays
Before takeoff their instruments were indicating different speeds the Fo was concerned and did raise the issue to the captain but the captain did ignore it until it became a bigger problem
Fly blind fly safe
the pilot didnt respond to the F/O's suggestion to return to CGK or redirect to nearest airport
Retired airline EVP (Fleet Management), MD-11 PIC... Watching this video, my heart sunk immediately into my stomach watching the PDF during the final descent. I can't imagine a more frightening experience for a pilot to have an uncommanded horizontal stabilizer movement that cannot be controlled. For myself, I have never felt comfortable with 100% fly-by-wire, and this is the reason.
Following the incident the day before, why wasn't the aircraft taken out of service until it could be thoroughly examined and remedied?
Rhetorically, I would like to know the genius who decided to take the AOA input from only a single sensor! In my view, that is simply unfathomable. AOA sensors can easily be damaged or malfunction due to water incursion or any number of factors. They have moving parts.
While I am not a fan of the Max MCAS system, the least that should have been done is provide three independent AOA vanes that could outvote a single malfunctioning unit. In my opinion, having two with a "disagree" alarm is simply not enough. Additionally, a manual override should have been provided to the pilots, and its use a key part of the orientation.
It's a damned shame.... These systems should be thoroughly tested and perfected, long before one passenger is allowed to board the aircraft.
Instead Boeing rushed it just to compete with the Airbus A320neo BC money matters more than human lives... Smh...
I still prefer permanent design change than software fix for design flaw
@@Armor23OnPatrol This particular plane had many issues. I cannot understand why Lion Air maintenance put it back into service. It's their responsibility to ensure all of the avionics are tested, and working correctly before putting it back into service. To me, this all looks very suspicious. I can't believe they are so incompetent. Something tells me this was sabotage. 38 Civil Servants on board. Hmm.. www.airlineratings.com/news/highly-respected-aviation-experts-critical-lion-air-pilots-crash-report/
Armor23OnPatrol 7
I couldn't even imagine how everybody felt on board this plane omg crazy 😥
I was flying with the same plane lion 737 max from CGK Jakarta Soekarno Hatta to bdj syamsudinur airport banjarmasan
Probably like "oh shit"
P
Yea, between praying and deciding which fate would be worse than the other (Diving into water or land) I can only imagine. If you have an opportunity, on Amazon Prime there's a recreation from flight ✈️ 93 on 911 that shares their last moments aboard before 😢 Some family members have assisted in sharing their last day with their loved ones along with voice-mail mesgs that were left if they missed their calls. I pray to our Father in Heaven, that he brings a calm & they don't have to experience an overwhelming amount of fear. *Keeping the loved ones who lost someone in this accident uplifted in prayer 🙏🏽🥀
P
I fly often, domestically and internationally, but if I knew, even at the gate, that I was going to board a 737 max I'd walk, even if it meant forfeiting my ticket.
@krigi I will give the plane one full year back in service with no glitches. I have to see it fly safely for a year before I'll believe in its integrity. If that occurs, I'll give it a high five.
@krigi Okay.
Luckily you don't have to worry about that at the moment because they're all still grounded.
And me
In flying, even if the aircraft is in perfect condition, its still rolling the dice. Pilot error, weather, ATC overworked, maintenance crews, re-fueling crews, just to name a few things. Flight from Salt Lake to Portland 2002, look out my window to see another 737 blasting out of a cloud, when they went by, i saw both their captain and FO heads whip to see us. Yes, that god damned close!! Their plane was at a slight angle to our flight path, another fraction of a second sooner into our flight, well, i wouldn't be writing this. Its all luck when we survive these airplanes, just luck.
I’m not ever flying again, after watching these videos. I’m not trusting my life with technology that can malfunction and cost me my life.
After watch this, go watch ferry sinking, car crashing, train wreck ... you'll ended up never leave your home. Even then, there's possibility gas leaking, slippery bathroom floor, electric malfunction causing burning the house.
@@bendegorro754 i can Rambo my way out of most of what u said, I cannot Rambo my way out 10,000 ft in the air. No thanks, I’m not ever flying again and I stand by that!!
@@welcometotheshow5247 good luck ramboing your way off a sinking ferry you twazzock
I still remember when the accident occurred. I was at school with my friend, waiting for class to begin. Suddenly I hear a plane up above and catch a glimpse of the red tail told my friend (because in my school I'm the only one that love aviation so much) "oh look a Lion Air B737". Little did I know, it was the doomed PK-LQP.
Thats sad... Last moments.. 😢
RIP TO ALL PASSENGERS AND THE CREW 🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Thankyou TFC to created this video
🙏🙏🙏
You could have just fit that onto a single line.
yes
Rest in peace.
An utter nightmare
Pray God among and bless us
Fact: The video is longer than how long flight 610 lasted.
oh my god
Imagine being in a plane and suddenly it pitches down and up oh hell no
Holy shit
Well damn, chilling thought. At least it was all over quickly though...
Indeed. The flight of Lion Air 610 lasted about 12 minutes.
Great job putting this documentary together. Appreciate the hard work.
The most Criminal aspect is the Pilots were not told about this system, or how powerful it is & there is no indication that it has engaged ~ or that it's very simple to inhibit it.
Where did you get the information that the pilots were not told about the system. They knew enough to turn it off. So one would assume they were required to apply the runaway trim checklist.
From industry contacts.. MCAS is fully automatic & works in the background,, intentionally.. Turning off the Stab trim is not the same & pilots were not told that either..
Andy B. I think if you read the checklist (and the ET preliminary report) you will find you are not correct. MCAS acts on the trim system of the aircraft. Pilots are trained on runaway trim. It is a memory checklist item.
You are confusing 2 separate systems and cause & effect, a common mistake in Aircraft Fault diagnostics. Ref to the Bloncolario chanel & an expert Pilots view
Andy B. I assume the accident investigators must also be confused. Best we get your expert and ask him to write to them and tell them they have it all wrong.
The investigators (and Boeing) detailed MCAS as adjusting the stabilizers to force the nose down. This is overridden by ..... disabling automatic trim. (Item 4 in the checklist). The pilot disabled the trim But as the cockpit voice recorder shows complained about not been able to manually trim the aircraft. The pilot then reengaged the system and on run a way was forced to switch it off again.
This happened 5 times. Each time the pilot could not trim manually.
What the pilot failed to account was the aircraft was still at takeoff thrust and as every pilot is taught - the ability to manually trim is affected by the speed of the airflow across the control surface. If the pilot had reduced thrust it would have been easier to manually trim and correct the issue.
Unfortunately when the aircraft crashed - flight data showed that the thrust levers were still set at takeoff thrust.
Funnily enough - all this is in the preliminary report. Together with diagrams and everything. Just a google away.
But. Easier to watch an expert on RUclips is pose. 🤷♂️
Though I do not desire to, I can only imagine what those poor souls were thinking during this erratic fatal flight.
When your having that much trouble , It's time to return to base .
Watching these is like drinking,...sometimes one doesn't know when to stop. Now I understand what "binge watching" videos is. Haha
It took one long years to identify MCAS was the reason for plane to crash by putting the plane nose down automatically and pilot did his job by climbing up and up again. How could one conclude a report by saying its a pilot error when he is not aware of the reason for flight nose coming down by itself.
I think there’s a medium. The plane shouldn’t have been having these problems. The pilots should have recognized that this type of flying was not possible so short after take off and should have returned to the airport. Especially with the discrepancies between the F/O and Captain’s instruments.
@@Mobius1314 Do you believe the despatcher agree to cancel the flight?? When the previous day night flight was successfully landed even after having this kind of similar issue. The pilots are forced to tackle such issues if arises by mental pressure from operators rather than thinking about aborting the flights. They have nothing to do with this kind of external pressures like enquiries that why the captain decided to abort the flight in between and if he don't provide clear reason he may face termination or demotions. Hence here captain wanted to avoid such enquiries and tried to find out the issues but unable to do so and by the time they think about going back everything finished sadly.
sathish kumar Passenger safety always comes first regardless of whether the aircraft landed the previous night or not.
@@Mobius1314 The carrier has to think about it, if pilot does request for emergency landing he must be able to provide exact details why he requested to do so, in this case pilot was unaware of the reason for this misreading and they are trying to find the reason to report to the panel if they had to request for emergency landing
@P Whippany - When I watch sport on tv I often say "I would've ran a bit faster", "I would've caught that ball" or "I would've driven a bit faster through that corner" etc - but I'm joking. I sincerely wish I could believe that you are too.
"Those two moron pilots", and the other two who LOST THEIR LIVES in an uncontrollable 737 MAX, did exactly what they were trained to do - including, in the case of the other two 'morons', following the advice of the AD issued after this crash which simply reintroduced the instability MCAS was designed to correct.
Had Boeing originally disclosed the nature of this inherent instability at high - but within the normal flight envelope - angles of attack, these 'morons' would've followed the procedure known to Boeing's test pilots and regained control (provided they then avoided high angles of attack). Had Boeing subsequently disclosed it in the AD circulated after these 'morons' lost their lives, the other two 'morons' would've recognised the inherent instability they experienced while following that procedure as NOT the original issue, and not re-engaged the auto-trim that allowed MCAS to override their control inputs and eventually put them into an unrecoverable, high-speed dive.
I hope that in the future you re-visit your comment, having armed yourself with the knowledge that, at the time of your comment, was already in the public domain if you took the time to research it instead of 'shooting from the hip', and feel deeply ashamed of your disgraceful 'morons' accusation.
RIP to the 346 victims of Boeing's profit-motivated non-disclosure, including the 4 'morons' who followed their training to the letter - under extreme pressure that you and I could probably not imagine in our worst nightmares.
MCAS : May Crash Any Second
Pilots should be able to identify then turn off the software causing malfunction. They should be acknowledged with every single detail added by the manufactures.Computers can't beat Human judgement with experience and training most of the time esp if unusual happens. Manual option should be present semiautomatic is best for safety and comfort.
@hawkturkey I guess they have to take extra steps when so many lives are involved. Or remove it as it's causing more harm then good what's the use then, how many more accidents to prove it's not doing any advancement in safety. A single should be more then enough.
@@moodmeditation4458 Before you judge, watch this: ruclips.net/video/OxPsxmU_ocI/видео.html
@@moodmeditation4458 100% boeings fault
@@moodmeditation4458 There were problems with some max jets here in America and those planes did not crash. Out pilots were older and more experienced and knew what to do. Those people are safe. Still. I don't like, nor trust computers.
Thank you so much for making these videos for all of us. You put in so much effort , time , and hardwork to make these videos. It is a long , time consuming job . I can’t thank you enough for all your hardwork. I wish you continued success and hope you keep getting more and more viewers.
Great as your videos always are, thank you so much! In this one i just couldnt help but notice the improvement in graphics... What sim is this?
You shouldn’t try to compensate a bad design with software. Period.
just like ford's dual clutch transmission designs
You actually just plain can't take the "bad" out. You can limit what is requested to safe levels, etc., but you can't pluck out bad.
Agreed
It seems to me that if and aircraft cannot be safely hand flown it should not be certified. Pilots were never told MCAS even existed. This thing's a POS, should have the airworthiness certification pulled pending FCS redesign and thorough flight testing. Software fix my ass.
Not a bad design. Its a different design that has pilots do training. The simple solution is to inform pilots of mcas so they can turn it off. Should'nt require training in that case.
I can't imagine anything worse Than being an ATC who realizes why he's no longer in contact with the crew ..🙁
Being a family member of one of the passengers seems worse. I can imagine a lot of things worse but maybe my imagination is just better.
Thanks flight channel for providing really clear information, explanation, and for picturing it really well.
Wow, I didn't know that FO suggested returning at first trouble, but the captain ignored. But who knows, maybe the plane would not make it back safely either and would crash in residential area killing more people.
Flying is safe
At the first sign of any instrument failure, "Hey Tower! I AM coming back now. I'll land on a Ferris Wheel if I have to, but I am not being up here."
@@kaihunlu2345 Not sure if you are aware but getting the plane up and having time to decipher is the right call even if they decide to return back. This is not a sports car to make a U turn and come back within seconds.
@@sred5856 If I were flying alone, ok, but seeing some problem while carrying hundreds of people, I'd go back. But I also probably wouldn't have a job long due to this.
@@kaihunlu2345 Even carrying hundreds of people, just turning back Is not practical. Remember the flight right before this one experienced the same problem, they troubleshooted for a while and then were given a suggestion by a 3rd pilot in the jump-seat to turn off the AP and Stab trim and they hand flew the plane the rest of the way, no problem. In the scenario's where the pilots took some time, fought the problem for a while and ultimately figured out the problem and everything went well afterwards, nobody is criticizing them for not returning immediately.
My mum was in that plane. Rest in peace mummy. I ll forever remember you
😥😥
Why you write This Same Comment in Video with America Worst Accident?
@@marcellinojordybagaskara5939 I think that is Fake News
@@ElBoberinho no is real
@@marcellinojordybagaskara5939 Oh
Whoever engineers these videos does a fantastic job.
Thank you for another amazingly well produced and documented video.
Boeing "quietly" installed mcas to compensate for the engines, knowing they could always blame the pilots and/or mechanical problems if the planes crashed.
I've seen several documentaries on this Laura and there's a lot of finger pointing going on at ALL levels. Seems the competition from Airbus drove Boeing to cut a few corners (and that's putting it mildly) - not even bothering to tell the pilots, put a note in the training manual, telling the operators or even (as I've noted above) putting a redundant backup in there. Hell, that's why we have two of pretty much everything on large commercial airliners and even many smaller planes.
Well all the airlines are going down the pan due to lockdown, and I’m glad . Maybe when they come back they can be safer !!!
@@karenhunt805 they’re never coming back, DA
IMO if the captain & F/O were having different readings, why continue the flight ?? not to mention the issues on PREVIOUS flight. That plane should of never taken off.
Planes have returned to the airport as soon as it became apparent that something wasn't right. Can't believe the company still sent that aircraft back up after the previous incidents.
@@Cissy2cute I heard a FSDO safety officer/pilot mention his distrust of foreign pilot training.
@@REDMAN298 There was a debate under another video (wish I could remember which one) about foreign training with quite a few mentioning that it was not comparable to those of the West, so to speak. Since there might be a pilot shortage, one wonders that if true, how this is going to effect this situation.
@@Cissy2cute The most insane thing is that the flight crew on the previous flight completely failed to mention the uncommanded stabilizer movements. They mentioned other related issues like IAS disagree but not the biggest issue. Lion Air safety culture is a joke.
@@ghstark I made mention several times of the flight training and much lower certification time and methods. The United States requires 1,500 hours of flight time to earn your ATP license. A higher standard than any nation. The F/O had 200 hours total flight time yet was serving as a first officer. I'm a captain and I have almost 20,000 hours accumulated. Once again, we have about 28 of these aircraft within the fleet. Not one of us had issues of this nature. Southwest is the second largest operator of the 73 800. No issues either. Run away trim is also a scenario that is delt with in proper training. Knowing the proceedure would have saved both aircraft.
Stop demonizing Boeing. Failures and unknowns happen on all aircraft. Boeing has the best safety record of any manufacturer. There are more Boeing aircraft in commercial service than any other. At the end of the day we as crew see safety as paramount as our lives are on the line as well. If
we feel the aircraft is unsafe we're certainly not going to fly it. Tragically, some design flaws don't become evident until there is a failure.
I almost cried with the video thinking of being a passenger in that moment, too sad. All those lifes..:(
Thank you theflightchannel, I've always been enjoy watching your video, until you came up with this one. And my mom was there . do u guys know what is the saddest part? My mom was on flight from bali to jkt then head up to pangkal pinang... like idk how it feel anymore ffsㅠㅠ and after waiting 2 years, this video explains the details of the JT610 crash
will be interesting to see how people view this plane when it returns to service. You would think that the "fix" will be so thoroughly thought out and tested, that it would be very safe....considering Boeing's future depends on it.
As the captain demonstrated, it was possible to counter the effects of the MCAS by commanding noseup trim whenever the MCAS commanded nose down trim. We'll probably never know why first officer allowed the aircraft to become progessively out of trim to the point where it was no longer controllable, especially as returning an aircraft to neutral trim is pretty much instinctive for pilots.
This is not to relieve Boeing of blame, of course, since the crew should never have been put into that situation.
You are right Sylvia. When the co-pilot took control, the disaster became set. Maybe if first officer had a few more seconds to figure out, he might have gotten it right. Pilots are human so have different reaction time, etc. Maybe the captain should have instructed better to use the auto-trim during the handoff. Maybe the co-pilot was doing something else just then. Unfortunately they just didnt have the time and altitude in their favor. Maybe a few extra seconds was what separated the crash and a return back!
It still angers me that Boeing knew
@Polly Ester: Boeing: US regulator admits 'mistake' over aircraft crashes www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-50750746
@Julian Crooks Somewhat reminiscent of the criminal negligence committed by Omni Consumer Products when they created the ED-209 Enforcement Droid with a known glitch. A glitch that cost the life of a junior executive. Damn that Dick Jones!
Julian Crooks As per report in UK newspaper I quote at a court hearing in US yesterday someone from AA is quoted at giving figures for how many could die on Max without its fix. The figures are shocking he said over its 45 year perhaps lifespan you could average every 3 years a fatality .in that case say 157 like died in Max every 3years for 45 years it comes to 2335 divided by 45 its roughly 51people dieing a year
I wish I could get my hands on this report it was at the hearing at the house transportation safety committee Mr Peter DeFazio google it ❤️✈️🇬🇧🇺🇸😂
private companies goal is money. nothing else.
Experience pilots on Boeing aircraft also know when the big wheel by your knee is spinning and clattering, your trim is moving. They know how to react and FLY THE PLANE.
“Should we land?”
“Nah let’s just play around & see what happens”
Finally, Boeing found guilty and charged more than $2.5 billion
Yeah because of the latest incident on sriwijaya air
@@K2KOfcoursegg nope, it because ethiopian accident that sealed 737 max fate. i remember when boeing try to accuse knkt (indonesian ntsc) for being make abysmal investigation.
fyi, the sriwijaya air one are the older variant, 737-500
@@francelonelo9187 before the Sriwijaya incident they were also charge but when sriwijaya incident comes they been charge more
@@K2KOfcoursegg no it's not. Otherwise give us your source
@@miltonalex5928 Tribun news that’s the channel of the video and i can’t find it anymore because there is many vid about this incident
You'd think we live in a day and a age where this should never happen. It's almost like we're living in the past.
Thats the results of making things far to complicated.
In the past engineers had more brain than now.. Now they have a software for everything..
People have to get paid, so they will constantly and continually screw with and try to "improve" things forever, even on very reliable systems. Sometimes this creates products that are worse than where they were before. It's this way in every industry, but is especially obvious in engineering and computer software.
Why would you think that..? We might be the most advanced species on this planet but in terms of advanced technology we haven't even scraped the surface. You've deluded yourself if you think things like this shouldn't still happen, we're nowhere even close to preventing such disasters in our society.
This was no accident what so ever, rather downright murder due Boeing did so many ''mistakes'' in order to produce Maxs as cheap as possible for example;
1- Instead of designing a new aircraft they just placed bigger engines on an old design to cut costs but the ''new'' aircraft had balance issues they didn't care.
2- To make Maxs more profitable for airlines they faked evidence as it's flight characteristics were same as 737s so pilots wouldn't need simulator training which cost a lot of money and time..
3- But Max's characteristics were different than 737s indeed and it was stalling in lower angel of attack than 737s so for preventing pilots stalling Maxs while trying to fly same as how they flied 737s Boeing added a ninja system to control AOA and prevent possible stalls..
4- And even if this was already murder anymore they even pushed it further and somehow ''decided'' a single sensor was enough for this MCAS system as pilots could disable it if something goes wrong!! But the problem was because they lied as it had same characteristics pilots didn't receive proper training at first place and couldn't act properly in such a senario even then they somehow managed to blame pilots which is a total joke in every way..
If this was done by Airbus there were hundreds of billions dolar fines flying around by now but because it is Boeing US does everything in order to postpone fines as much as possible so Boeing could get enough time to brace for impact!! Even then nobody should fool themselves as Boeing will get record breaking fines soon or later...
The second they had discrepancies with air speed I would have returned and landed
That was brand new machine. It is hard to doubt on the shiny plane's reliability.
Easier said than done however. Once you get an unreliable airspeed indication all sorts of weird stuff can start to happen. I imagine they wanted to proceed very very carefully. There have been times when a plane had an erroneous airspeed indication, and it made the airspeed low and stalled warnings go off simultaneously, that's enough to make anybody go boggle.
That’s exactly what they tried to do
Yes I agree with you first sign of trouble I would have declared a emergency landing, I don't know the pilots were thinking.
COMPTOONMAN wasn’t it at v1 when they noticed problem v1 is last chance for canceled take off once they hit v2 they have to take off
Been watching this series during Halloween, far more scarier than ghosts movies
this channel does very nice work!
This company should be sued back to the stone age and the people who pushed it through should be sent to prison for life.
@@whytho5196 What was his severance package? USD28 million?
an addition; one civil servants from indonesian ministry of environment and forestry also became a victim in the accident. he's my father's friend.
edit: thanks for all of your prayers. may he and all of the victims rest in peace 🙏
Reza Andrian I‘m sorry 😔
I'm sorry for your lost man
Dammit, that was hard ....
and today my father will take a flight from balikpapan to jakarta. hope everything's gonna be okay guys 🙏.
Innalillahi wainnailaihi rojiun..
I remember hearing about the crash when it happened (im indonesian btw) everyone in school talked about it and everyone speculated the reason of the crash. From bombs to pilot error and the weirdest one i heard, someone used their phone mid flight
This is my new favorite channel. These works are highly appreciated and very detailed. Keep up the good work!
"MCAS was designed to rely on a single AOA sensor..."
I'm sure there was at least one competent person in the room who flagged this as a potential problem during a meeting. They should've listen to him/her.
And if there wasn't then maybe Boeing should take a break for a while.
Exactly. How do you not compensate for a potentially faulty censor?
@Joey Dugo
Dual redundancy has always been the standard in commercial aviation at the major manufacturers....something really went wrong here.
There was at least one whistleblower who flagged this problem before the crash according to the ongoing reports in the New York Times.
All systems on a jet aircraft are usually triple redundant. This type of engineering is criminal.
No disrespect, but it amazes me that all these years later, with SO much information now available about Boeing's DIRECT RESPONSIBILITY for these accidents, that people still speculate about 'pilot error'.
Had that been the case, all that would have happened is more comprehensive training.
Go do some reading, it's now well documented what a *bean counting, corner cutting death trap* this version of the Max was, and how radically different it has become post grounding.
Eg
MCAS has now been restricted to 1.5deg as originally specd before Boeing increased it without FAA approval
MCAS can no longer continually, dangerously deflect the stab - it operates ONCE
MCAS is no longer dependent on just one AoA sensor
And that's just scratching the surface.
Yes and anyone with an eye for design can see this airplane looks a lot like the Reindeer of Jimmy Stewart days.(No HHighway in the Sky Marlena Deitrich) . I thought the DC 10 would be that airplane because of the shortcut Douglas took tin mounting Engine #2 on top of the tail assembly tinstead of routed into the airframe as in the Lockheed L-1011. But it was the cargo door that cut the hydraulics. In this cluster **** of an airplane, Boeing took the old 737 airframe and just stuck those huge engines up and forward and it looks as if a child had designed it.
Woah woah woah... you mean to tell me that the previous flight with this aircraft had the thing going like a rollercoaster and the next day they still took peoples money and pilled them into it? That sounds like a cause of negligent homicide to me.
The airline knew the aircraft had issues and still chose to use the plane despite the previous crew raising an issue
yes, it was somehow a crew from a pretty popular indonesian reality show called "katakan putus"
@@stoje8405 meaning??? jump on, sit down and pray?
I flew on the max twice with Jet Airways. The first time I was excited to be on the new plane from Delhi to Goa. The second time was after this Lion Air incident and I was very nervous.
Rightfully so, it turns out. Cant imagine flying on this plane in the future.
they continued to fly 737 max after flight 610? And you got on it? Jesus dude....
@@tpstrat14 the ban came after the Ethiopian airlines crash. Still absolutely scary
@canusdominici may I ask if anything felt strange? I read reports from passengers on other Max flights that they had felt as if the plane struggled to gain altitude - this was prior to the Lion Air crash so they wouldn't have known about any issues at this point, just that the plane felt like it struggled.
@@blobfish. Absolute nonsense!
Thank you for making this video with additional displays of the aircraft's direction and altitude. This incident still breaks my heart, can't believe it's been more than a year. May people on board JT610 rest in peace, and their families stay strong. 🥺
I remember seeing the news on tv after school. I couldn't believe how fast the plane crashed after take off
Edit: another airplane accident in Indonesia. My deepest condolences to the family members
i was at school when reading this news but i don't know why tf i was like "huh?" but then when ET302 crashed it was same, i was at school and went pretty shocked tho, time gap is so near
Same i was in school when that happened and it was a rainy day on pangkalpinang
At the time after the crash
Wow, Soetta Airport does look like this if you see them in person, I'm amazed. Good job for the animation!!
He works really hard on every videos
The sad part is that the situation could possibly have been controlled if the crew applied the memory items and deactivated the automatic trim function on the yoke. If that was done , MCAS wouldn’t have any authority but the aircraft would have to be flown manually and trimmed using the trim wheel on the console . The pilots did not recognize the problem. It is a tragedy that 346 people had to die because of Boeing making unfounded assumptions about MCAS. Will the MAX be allowed to fly again? At this point it is anyone’s guess.
if a company's mega profit item so of course it will fly and of course more people will die. just like all their previous designs that constantly crashed that costed thousands of lives over the years.
Fantastic video!! I really appreciate the time and effort you put on your videos for us to see them. The quality and visual effects are amazing. Can't wait for your next video! #TFCforever
The animation and graphics in these videos is just superb!
Pretty sure it's a flight simulator
@@TheBoringLlama Pretty sure you're right. Designed by somebody with real talent!
There should be a button on all planes that you can push that gives the pilot full control of the plane so he can FLY THE PLANE.
Exactly! there is its called autopilot/mcas off
Too complex, sorry
no no no, you're not using your brain at all. Think about it. If the pilots were allowed to have full control of the airplane, how would the plane be able to savagely crash itself and murder everybody? That is the plane's right, and you can't take it away. It simply isn't fair.
@@UseADamnCoaster LOL I actually thought you were gonna say a real reason why the pilots cant take full control of the plane i did not expect that turn of events.
There is tho.
Thank you TFC . When the news came out about this crash I was so heartbroken. I was just getting back into being interested about aviation and that set my hope down.
Have a flight tomorrow. 🙏🏻🙏🏻
Be safe
Hey! Have a safe journey
Happy journey! Where are you flying, if I may ask?
Stay safe
Just remember that all studies and research prove that flying is the safest mode of transportation. Who knows, you may be one of the best pilots in the world if safety is your priority!
Thank you for making this! Means alot to be informed visually about these planes.
Anyone else here cause you saw downfall? Very interesting video, so sorry for all the lost people in both crashes
MCAS=Money Comes Above Safety
Ironically Boeing lost billions due to these accidents
The American way, FAA and Boeing = keep the money rolling in for corporate America.
@@steviesevieria1868 Did you read the comment above or?
Damn
Here's an idea. Lets go to boeing's channel and paste this comment on their videos. As a reminder.
They should’ve turned back to the airport the minute they noticed something was wrong
This should be a precaution especially if it's something the pilots have no idea about.
They can't just doing u turn taxiing on active runway.
Poise They had to gain control of the plane before they could attempt a landing...which they never had. Did you see the city around the airport? Without having control of the plane, attempting a landing of an out of control plane would not just have cost the lives on the plane but all the lives on the ground where they crashed.
Did you notice the plane was randomly pointing towards the ground?
I would have contacted the tower the moment the stick shaker activated upon rotation. Didn't sound like there was good communication between the Captain & FO.
Your work is something else dude, excellent music too.
When the first one crashed I actually had a feeling that it would happen again. I didn't even look at reports or anything, just heard about it.
I knew pilots from SW. They said the regular 737 drove like a race car. The MAX drove like a minivan.
When you see the first problem, just try to land the damn thing back at the first opportunity. That should be the SOP. Ponder the problem from the ground. Don't do a holding pattern and investigate from up in the air. Don't make the passengers guinea pigs of some high altitude experiment they didn't sign up for!
Jesus christ. Have you ever flight a plane before ? I know i never have but surely you can't just land the plane when something goes wrong. MCAS activated when it's taking off . THE PLANE IS CONTROLLING ITSELF WHEN THAT HAPPENS.
@@gb7586 i agree
The MCAS scandal is, IMO, the single craziest thing to ever happened in the industry. The industry has been working for a century in EXACTLY the opposite direction. The efforts that have been made in aircraft safety point in a certain direction in several key areas. Basically, a tremendous effort has been made on everything being redundant, when it comes to information fed to either the pilots or automated systems, always information must come from two sources, always fail safe, never do anything without informing everyone in the crew, and don't introduce changes to an aircraft without proper re-certification. Whenever automation has been implemented, the focus has always been on this particular disastrous scenario: A computer blindly trusting certain information and making a mistake, and a computer telling the pilots "I'm sorry, Dave, I'm afraid I can't let you do that". The amount of fear-mongering that Boeing spread after Airbus introduce the A320 was INSANE, even though Airbus had done pretty much everything right. In the end, after so much care was taken in that direction, it ended up being Boeing, the master of "our aircraft don't change", the master of "your pilots don't need to recertify", the FAA's and NTSB's golden boy, whose rhetoric has always been KISS, and who has always made fun of Airbus and other manufacturers for being too technological, and pointing out how "the pilots are the ones in control on a 737", who finally introduced that dreaded scenario. And it's costed us human lives.
And it ended up being not some crazy complex scenario in which the autopilot does something crazy in a very specific situation. Nope, rather something super simple and straightforward. An error in AOA readings causing an erroneous nose-down correction is like the 101 of "test your damn automation".
Worst of all is HOW this all happened. It's all part of Boeing's history of "no, we will not redesign this airplane". The 737 has been a pile of hacks Boeing installed on top of an already obsolete design. The second the FAA saw Boeing trying to retrofit larger engines on an obsolete design all those years ago, and all the crazy shit they did to make that work, they should've told Boeing to fuck off and go back to the drawing board. It's what they would've told Airbus, or MCD, or any other manufacturer. But, of course, not Boeing, because politics.
This error can be traced back step by step all the way back to the 80s and the 737s truly odd nacelle shape. That's when the FAA should've told Boeing to fuck off and redesign their aircraft. Instead, they let them keep going. And they did, all the way to the MAX's oddly shaped, oddly mounted engines, and all the problems they brought. So instead of finally saying "yeah, we can't keep putting larger engines on this piece of shit 50 year old technology, let's design something new", they tried to fix a hardware problem on software.
In the IT industry, we have a saying for this: "Beware of programmers who carry screwdrivers", as part of a longer saying about the three major threats a system faces: A programmer with a screwdriver, a technician with a software patch, and a user with an idea.
Boeing tried to do something we've all known shouldn't be done for 50 years: Fixing hardware problems in software. And a whole lot of people died because of that. Worst part is, had the FAA shown the kind of bias they had towards MCD, or Aerospatiale, or any other manufacturer, towards Boeing, they would've grounded the 737s after the first incident. They didn't, and it wasn't until China and Europe told them to fuck off that they decided to do something. So we should add one item to that listing: Should be programmers with screwdrivers, mechanics with software patches, users with ideas, and politicians in safety boards.
A320neo is about the same kind of hack, which is really to say that it isn't a hack. Fly-by-wire software also allows some odd aerodynamic quirks to be corrected in software, and it's quite probable that Airbus is doing similar because it completely makes sense to adjust feel in software.
@@AmbientMorality Not comparable at all. The A320 was designed for fly by wire from the beginning. That is what the aircraft does. So it's not really solving hardware problems in software, it's that that in its entirety is the domain of software. The computers have always been flying the plane, and the pilots send input to the computers. Instead the 737 is not fly by wire, never was, never will be. It's computer-assisted, which is quite different. The MAX changed *some* things to fly by wire, such as the spoilers, but not everything else. MCAS is not fly by wire, trim is still manually controlled, and MCAS is an augmentation. Think of cars. Initially we had purely mechanical steering. Then hydraulic steering was introduced, then electric, but it's all still mechanically linked. Even Tesla's steering is mechanically linked, then assisted, then computer-assisted. Also, the A320 is a moder modern design, and it never had ground-clearance issues, so they never needed to change anything to retrofit new engines. The engines are mounted in the exact same place as in the old one, and there was no need for an odd-shaped nacelle because it had enough ground clearance to begin with.
Think of MCAS as the modern implementation of a very simple system that many large aircraft have used quite safely for many decades....a stick pusher. Boeing's only mistake was to presume that a crew would recognise a problem with nose down trim being commanded erroneously as a stabiliser trim issue, refer to FRC's & disable it when a problem occurred; rather than what these two crews did....extremely poor CRM, fought the trim problem over & over again, ignored the stabiliser checklists until far too late & didn't fly the aircraft at a safe manual-trimming speed. By the time they did get their shit together & did the correct (simple) recovery actions it was too late; they were going far too fast & in an irrecoverable dive.
@@wirdy1 The big difference is that a stick pusher activation is a VERY visible action, it can be overpowered by the pilot, and can be disengaged easily.
That said, I do agree the pilots reacted absolutely poorly. It sounds unbelievable that with such control issues, after stick shaker activation on take off, and a very visible airspeed disagree, they didn't decide to return immediately.
MCAS or no MCAS, it's a trim runaway, it's something every pilot should train for, and they should've been able to handle it.
MCAS has been around for many years, used in military transport aircraft. The problem is the single angle of attack sensor, with no redundancy.
First day of flight training in a C-152:
1. This is how you start the engine.
2. This is how you take off.
3. Time to practice stalls.
Boeing: These professionals with thousands of flight hours might forget how to avoid a stall - let's design a system that does it for them!
Anything that has the word "automatic" in front is scary. I can only imagine when cars really get to drive themselves, with SW written by kids or summer students.... It is very difficult to write code that can deal well with sensor malfunctions in a resilient manner.
Well they can't do any worse than humans, so far we kill over 1 million people per year globally due to recklessness or being unfit to drive.
After the second plane crashed, didn't Boeing immediately claim that there were no similarities between the two crashes?
Both were MCAS failure. but the secound crash they have dissabled the MCAS. but way too late to recover from the divd
boeing lye
Many similarities between Boeing and the US government... A nose dive out of control...
@@jossdionne9810 What you know about either entity could fit in a thimble.
@@idesofmarch2368 That doesn't make him wrong.
This channel is actually pretty neat. R.I.P to all the crash victims
Tony Knight they could all be saved if the pilot wasnt an idiot
Zyran it was not the pilots fault it was Boeing’s
@@zee1645 u r fcking idiot bitch
Love the music chosen, especially that at the trailing end of this video.
Look up emotional orchestra music on youtube. Youre welcome.
Do you know the specific song played in this video?
@@thevillakingzmusic8323 is that where the music played in this video is from? Bc idk the name of this specific song ☹
@@atla_744 idk let me watch the vid again hold up
@@atla_744 dont know but im sure its from a soundtrack of a modern xmen marvel type movie. If you love this piece, you will find it :) sorry i couldnt help.
May the passengers and crew of Lion Air flight 610 and Ethiopian Airlines flight 302 RIP. ❤️❤️
You made it so realistic, even the buildings in the airport. Good job, i love your works
As soon as the impairment was noticed in the FD's they should have returned immediately to the airport.
I agree. They shouldn't have just kept correcting the problem. If the aircraft isn't 100%, land it.
For real. I would've turned back as soon as possible. Yes, it is a priority to get passengers to their destination quickly, but it's also a priority to KEEP THEM ALIVE!
@UltralightFlyer
As soon as there was disagreement between airspeed sensors before V.1 I would have aborted, even if it meant I would have rolled to the very end of the runway.
that plane had serious issues in previous flights, yet the Captain just shrugged it off
@@exoraturbo25 Absolutely! The instruments are paired for a reason. Any difference between the two and you park the bus!
I remember when these accidents occurred and Boeing came under a lot of fire because they offered warning lights for MCAS and AOA malfunctions, but they cost extra. Neither the Lion Air or Ethopian Airlines flight had these extras installed.
That's really salt in the wound, and would incline me to avoid flying in Boeings in the future.
Appreciate the work buddy.. same background and same location..
Finally! Been waiting for this.
There's at least one more to come..stock up on the tissues..
@@highstandards6226 if you're on about the Ethiopian airlines flight that was done not too long ago idk if there was a third crash
@@cyanrecords7933 he already did a vid on ethiopian airlines, theres 2 of em though, an older one and a remake
@@Artceps I know that he already did. I already stated that he did
@@Artceps more like a repost, pretty sure he removed the old one
Thank You To Make This Video.
Memories to all passenger and crew.
From Indonesia 🇮🇩
great content
thank you for the music to help with the depressing moment of the crash, helps a little
I just feel what went through their mind in the cockpit . Ground approaching ... Still the captain was doing checklists and qrh to save it till the last minute... Bravehearts
The crew SHOULD have been flying the airplane and not trying to solve problems. If so BOTH crashes would have been avoided. In both instances had they simply disengaged the AP and AT...they COULD have returned. Flying by rote memory items is NOT good pilotage.
@@TakeDeadAim False. AP was not engaged, in fact MCAS **will not** activate when the AP is flying the plane. Furthermore, when the pilot pulls back on the control column the MCAS will pay no attention and will simply compensate with more AND stabilizer movement. If the pilots knew how MCAS worked they might have had a chance to diagnose this as an MCAS problem. However, Boeing included no useful information about MCAS in the flight manual and provided no training on its operation. That doesn't mean there was no pilot error, but you're "just fly the airplane" claim is wrong.
Why in the hell would a pilot continue flying an airplane displaying such serious control issues? Declare an emergency and get back to the airport.
@@MikeBrown-ex9nh There's no way of landing an airplane with such serious control problems. Actually, as it turns out, as soon as they'd extended the flaps MCAS would've disengaged and they could've flown the airplane. But they had literally no possible way of knowing that.
@@ghstark Maybe I misunderstood something in the video, but it seems they encountered the problem every time they retracted the flaps, yet didn't connect the dots. In any event, the plane shouldn't have been in use in the first place, and the pilots should have had adequate training for that particular emergency.
The night before it crash i genuinely excited coz im flying back home with lion air & i thought i was going to go on that new plane to soekarno airport i even took pictures of the plane but it turns out im going on a 738, but then when i read the news in the morning i almost throw up when i relize im seeing a dead plane the night before & the flight plan is going literally above me at my school at the time
I don't understand two issues. 1. Why the plane did not immediately return to the airport of departure. 2. Why did the pilot not land the plane at sea.
I've been watching this video every single hour. It just reminds me of how sad these incidents are. RIP to all the passengers on board Flights 302 and 610
This is what happens when accountants responsible only to the stock-holders are in charge. You can get away with this sh*t in the car industry (at least for a while) but you can *not* in their civilian airliners industry.
Yes, the world in a microcosm.
That is an nteresting comparison. In the a1970’s GM shifted power from design to finance (roger smith)
The company lost it’s way and still hasn’t recovered.