Panzer IV by Rye Field Model -- Post Build Review (RFM 5053)

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 15 окт 2024
  • This video will be a general review of the Rye Field Model Pz IV kits. I used a Pz IV Ausf.G kit, but actually built it as an early Ausf.H. These changes are easy to make since most of the required parts are included in the kit as unused spares. Rye Field Model makes the Ausf.H and Ausf.J models using many of the same sprues.
    Thanks to my friend Bruce (BruceTheModelNoob on RUclips) for helping me with these changes. He knows the Pz IV very well
    -------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Follow me on Instagram:
    / panzermeister36
    My Facebook Page:
    / panzermeister36
    Support me and my videos on Patreon!
    / panzermeister36
    The tank-themed cutting mat is by Tankraft:
    tankraft.com/
    Listen to the Plastic Model Mojo Podcast while you build:
    www.plasticmod...
    DISCLAIMER: I am not paid to promote any specific products or brands; I just use the products I find work best for me through my experiences. There is no reason for me to promote a bad product, as then I would not enjoy using it, not like the result on my model, and not be proud of publicizing it in a video. There's also no point in me doing this to keep up relations with a company if the only benefit would be getting more of the same products that I didn't like. I have not used every product out there, but from what I have used, I keep using the products I like, and that's why I use them in my videos. You can use whatever other products you would like to and you can feel that they are better - that is your opinion, and is perfectly fine by me, thus I hope that feeling is reciprocated.

Комментарии • 110

  • @nathanc5778
    @nathanc5778 Год назад +22

    I'm quite fond of RFM generally. Rivals Dragon for accuracy but less expensive. Thanks for the review, keep up the good work.

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +7

      I agree now. Dragon kits have excellent detail but they often have unclear or incomplete instructions. And now they've gotten unreasonably expensive for >15-year old kits. RFM kits are even better in terms of flawless fit and detail, the instructions are perfectly clear, and they're reasonably priced.

  • @HamilkarBarkasScaleModelling
    @HamilkarBarkasScaleModelling Год назад +16

    Very good! You have sparked my interested in a Rye Field Panzer IV, luckily i have their H variant in my stash haha :) I like the little modifications you did, especially the battered side skirt rails on the hull. Very convincing.

    • @seegurke93
      @seegurke93 Год назад +3

      I guess the tracks will take a while :D

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +3

      Thank you Michael! Yes, this vehicle caught my eye as it is quite beat up. It was an excellent kit. I will have to build their Pz III some day.

  • @jostscalemodelling
    @jostscalemodelling Год назад +5

    Thank you for presenting the kit. I am very impressed by the RFM Panzer IV! I'm looking forward to the sequel and a possible diorama! Best greetings, John

  • @timothywood4402
    @timothywood4402 Год назад +1

    Great video.Can’t wait for your late war stug 3 painting video too.

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад

      Thanks Timothy. That video is very nearly done. I will try to finish it over the holidays.

  • @tallyhoscalemodels
    @tallyhoscalemodels Год назад +1

    I am working on Dragon's 6300 Panzer IV. I have the lower hull done and painted. I also have an old set of Masterclub resin tracks ( I think they only make white metal ones now) which I purchased years ago but were a pain to assemble. After one run I broke out the aftermarket RFM set and will use a run from that boxing for the other side. Question. Would you recommend I weather the lower hull and tracks first before moving onto attaching the fenders then moving on to the superstructure?

  • @longlance67
    @longlance67 Год назад +4

    Ah nothing like a Panzermeister video to enjoy when I'm meant to be working lol

    • @steviegibson5847
      @steviegibson5847 Год назад +2

      Me too! LOL.

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +4

      Glad to see you have your priorities straight, Shane 😉

    • @longlance67
      @longlance67 Год назад +2

      @@Panzermeister36 the meister comes first haha 😄

  • @dogforeyals
    @dogforeyals Год назад +2

    I'm planning to get one myself, your review was a perfect timing. Thank you...:)

  • @canton7180
    @canton7180 Год назад

    I have to say ryefield has become my favorite model company

  • @colinkavanagh7625
    @colinkavanagh7625 Год назад

    Picked up one at a show a couple of months ago for 35 euro , delighted now with review. Thank You

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад

      I got this kit for a good price too. Very much worth it!

  • @SPSteve
    @SPSteve Год назад +5

    I built the RFM Pz IV J and really liked it. Another nice thing about RFM is the optional detail packages with 3D printed parts and additional PE available for many of their kits. The kits are fantastic for the price and they compare well to Dragon models. My only complaint with RFM is no zimmerit either molded on or included for the models that should have it.

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +3

      Yes, I do have some of their 3D printed upgrades that I will review soon.
      Excellent quality kits for sure. Zimmerit is tricky to mold onto kits, but Takom and Dragon have done it decently in the past so it's clearly possible.

    • @rickmoreno6858
      @rickmoreno6858 Год назад +2

      Their newest tiger One release a late model has a molded on zimmerit parts so it'll be interesting to see what it's like when I get mine this one is a full interior I imagine they'll release a non-interior version of that kit

    • @SPSteve
      @SPSteve Год назад +1

      @@rickmoreno6858 I'll look forward to the non-interior version. I'm building the Das Werk Tiger I now and I've had a lot of issues with it so an RFM TIger I with zimmerit will be welcome.

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +1

      Rick, you're right. I had forgotten about that recent announcement.

  • @wadebuff4465
    @wadebuff4465 Год назад

    A+ This is your very best video todate! Informative, interesting & concise! Keep up the good work. RFM seems to consistently have outstanding engineered kits unlike the competition. Looking forward to your next upload.

  • @johnboy384
    @johnboy384 Год назад +1

    Thanks for the video, always enjoy your reviews. They are very well done. Hope you have a great Christmas mate. Kind Regards from New Zealand

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад

      Thank you. I hope you have a wonderful Christmas season as well. Cheers from snowy Canada 😊

  • @paulmillard1130
    @paulmillard1130 Год назад

    I really am taken with RFM kits I think the quality is excellent. I have used certain soft steel fishing trace for pike fishing on 100 meter spools I think 30 pound is a bout right for tow cable.Looking in a fishing tackle shop should find it.

  • @G60syncro
    @G60syncro Год назад +2

    I'm wondering if dipping the tow cable thread in lacquer would help the look.

  • @claytonmcclain182
    @claytonmcclain182 Год назад +2

    Wow where have you been? Everything OK? Fantastic review it's awesome how many manufacturers of armor models today. When I started for armor there was 4. Really like how you make your builds look beat up too. Hoping you're gonna turn that Looking kit so far into a Viginette? Definitely looking forward to your next update. Painting and weathering I hope? God bless.

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +4

      Just busy with work and travel, but I appreciate you checking in. I don't think I'll do a vignette on this one, since I'm already doing one with the Jagdpanzer IV buddy build with Hamilkar Barkas. But I will do the full painting and weathering video on this one for sure :)

  • @kjaesp
    @kjaesp Год назад +3

    I have the interior pz iv ausf j about halfway into the hull interior and have completed the sherman with interior by them. Overall their molding is some of the sharpest and nicest in the hobby and their engineering is also really good in my experience. Parts are hard to misplace even with interior where there's so much going on. I got their leopard 2a6 with interior as well and can't wait to start it, apart from a few unfortunate ejection pin locations it looks absolutely amazing. The one thing I'm disappointed on for that leo is the markings provided and actual lack of options, as it only comes with the mg3 top mounted MG for example and two german examples only, no FN MAG, finnish, swedish, dutch or any other decals. luckily somone 3d prints fn mags specifically for leos and its a drop-in replacement on the RFM kit.
    All in a all if an armored subject has multiple vendor offerings I'll usually lean RFM.

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +1

      I agree completely. RFM is a go-to for me now. Top quality and very reasonable prices. We are lucky to have so much aftermarket now too for these small corrections 😊

  • @yattaran1484
    @yattaran1484 Год назад

    Watching your channel is always informative !.👍

  • @THROTTLEPOWER
    @THROTTLEPOWER Год назад

    Nice video Evan, looking really good. 👍🙂

  • @steviegibson5847
    @steviegibson5847 Год назад +1

    Fabulous review. I'm a HUGE fan of RFM - they are the best! I've finished their StuG III and have their PZ III and PZ IV to build and they love k epic in the box. I think the miniart PZ IVs are way overengineered and the plastic is thin and kind of soft.

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +1

      I have not yet tried a Miniart Pz IV or one of their new StuGs either, but I have built their stuff in the past and I did notice the soft plastic. It didn't feel like the best quality.

    • @steviegibson5847
      @steviegibson5847 Год назад +1

      @@Panzermeister36 that's what I thought. Soft plastic, thinly moulded pieces - did not feel sturdy. Overengineered - 10 pieces where as 2 or 3 pieces would do. Not for me! Not pleasurable. I have 3 or 4 mini art kits but they scare me! LOL.

  • @derekbaker3279
    @derekbaker3279 Год назад

    Excellent overview Evan (as always!). I have this kit in my stash, so I am thrilled that you have given the kit a thumbs-up! BTW, I am hearing high praise from people who have built MiniArt's Pz. IV kits, so perhaps you could build one at some point, and do a comparison?

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +1

      Thank you Derek! I want to do a Pz IV J at some point, so I may get the Miniart kit for that vehicle. It looks like a great kit.

  • @bobz1736
    @bobz1736 Год назад +1

    I dip the thread in watered down PVA glue, leave for 30 mins hanging with a weight attached, then position on the model before it sets hard 👍

  • @zulerodoeht329
    @zulerodoeht329 7 месяцев назад

    Thank you for the review, great job. You do great work. I would not know a Panzer 4G from a Panzer 4H, if they were both parked outside my house. I am about to finish a Rye Field T-55A, it is better in detail then a Takom kit and fewer parts then a Miniart kit. Question though, did your kit come with black rubber parts other then the wheel caps. T 55 had black parts that rejected every glue I could think of. Any info would be great. Keep up the good work.

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  7 месяцев назад

      I didn't notice any other rubber parts besides the poly caps. What type of part gave you issues on the T-55?

    • @zulerodoeht329
      @zulerodoeht329 7 месяцев назад

      A NBC warfare cover / hood for the driver's hatch, that was supposed to glue to a clear styrene lens and frame. I tried 2 part epoxy, rubber shoe repair glue, Tamiya extra thin, and others, the black parts just laughed at the glues. @@Panzermeister36

  • @panzer-meister
    @panzer-meister Год назад

    Excellent build as always. You seem to be busy at work. Please take care and I always hope you are successful at work.
    Have a nice week end. NOB

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +1

      Yes I had a busy time recently with work and travel. And many of my modelling projects were stuck waiting for aftermarket accessories to finish them. But I have more videos to release soon! Cheers

  • @rickmoreno6858
    @rickmoreno6858 Год назад +1

    The thing I enjoy about Rye field model kits is that there just as good as Dragon if not better and they are cheaper and available I'm like Dragon kits I can't seem to find them other than on eBay. Rye field is my favorite model company I think they are the best model company on the market right now. Great work cousin Panzer Meister 36

  • @od1452
    @od1452 10 месяцев назад

    Yes.. I like the RFM KVs . I ordered the G as my first RFM German kit and am looking fwd to building it. Not an Expert on PZ IV. .. so question. I thought the H had a slightly longer gun? OH... I loved you video on the King Tiger with zimmerit. It inspired me to build one. Like to see you do a Maus. Thanks for the review.

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  10 месяцев назад

      Thank you for the comment! The earlier Pz IV G did indeed have a gun 43 calibres long, but this was changed to a gun 48 calibres long during the middle of Ausfürung G production. This kit I used builds a very very late G that has most of the upgrades that are standard on an Ausfürung H (side skirts, turret traverse motor, longer gun, deleted turret side viewports, etc.) the only major differences between such a late G and an early H is the final drive cover armour, the drive sprockets, and the front armour being solid 80mm vs 50+30mm bolted/welded.
      To be honest, a Maus has been tempting me. My buddy Tankbrusher has made a 3D printed resin upgrade set that would be excellent to try out. That may be a project for me in a few months.

    • @od1452
      @od1452 10 месяцев назад

      @@Panzermeister36 Thanks for the reply.

  • @sugarhillsrr
    @sugarhillsrr Год назад

    Very good review, looking forward to seeing the finished model.

  • @SCALEBENCHplasticmodels
    @SCALEBENCHplasticmodels Год назад

    A excellent build and review !!! ... thanks for sharing :-) ... a big hug, cheers Markus

  • @paulhumphriesz4557
    @paulhumphriesz4557 Год назад

    Hi Never built a Panzer IV certainly not RFM but agree they are better in detail and a lot cheaper than Dragon which I always loved once but changed to Miniart but saying that I do have a Dragon Panzer IV Ausf. C in my stash which I must have started it but now I want to finish it and thank you for the link to the other channel you mentioned I will have a look thanks for the post review on this RFM kit like what you have done in changing it.

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад

      Thank you for your comment Paul! I also have a Dragon Pz IV C that I will be building this year. It's certainly a complicated kit from Dragon!

    • @paulhumphriesz4557
      @paulhumphriesz4557 Год назад

      @@Panzermeister36 thank you for the comments having re looked at it its not too bad had actually built most of it but have since pulled it apart and re worked some of it and yes you are quite right, too over engineered and typically confusing instructions and too many spare parts for other Panzer 4 kits but overall a good choice still have plenty of other dragon kits to get through but still prefer Miniart and also RFM. look forward to seeing your build of the Panzer IV Ausf. C.

  • @steeliron8246
    @steeliron8246 Год назад

    wow its a very high detailet Model, Rye Field Modells one of the best. Youre Panzer IV looks very great!!

  • @kevinkelly6524
    @kevinkelly6524 Год назад +2

    So would you consider this the “new” standard for a well detailed Pz IV kit compared to the Dragon, or does the Dragon still hold the crown?

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +2

      I would say Rye Field Model has improved over Dragon for sure. But they don't yet make all the versions like Dragon did.

  • @Gcscalemodels
    @Gcscalemodels Год назад

    thanks for the review, nice work dude!

  • @parabot2
    @parabot2 Год назад

    I like the RFM kits , very nice quality indeed .

  • @nevillegoddard4966
    @nevillegoddard4966 Год назад

    Thanks for the review! I haven't yet built an rfm model, but would like to. Maybe a T34 if they do one. I really like the panzer IV though, & if you like it better than the dragon offerings, then I'll give it a go! But the T34 is first.

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад

      I'm excited by the RFM T-34 kits too. But, I'm not a fan of the 85mm one; I much prefer the look for the 76mm versions. Hopefully they will do those too someday.

  • @waynestarick5282
    @waynestarick5282 Год назад

    Did you add the dent on the muffler and ‘bang-up’ the side skirt rails? Also, it would be nice to see your reference photo. Great review!

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +1

      Hello Wayne. Yes I did that damage to model a specific vehicle. I will include the reference photos in the painting and weathering video. Thank you!

  • @rrl4245
    @rrl4245 Год назад +2

    Hope you show us the painting process...

  • @davidstone-haigh4880
    @davidstone-haigh4880 Год назад

    Big fan of RFM kits. Have most of the Tigers they do. Do still enjoy Dragon Tiger kits from time to time but the prices are mad high.

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +2

      I agree completely. RFM is excellent and Dragon prices have gone up way too much for 15-year-old kits with a new box cover.

  • @grungy_lad
    @grungy_lad Год назад +2

    sideskirts and interleaved road wheels are the worst about late german armor yeah?

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +2

      Well, they can be interesting features of the vehicle, but they're very irritating to paint and weather as they have to be handled individually.

  • @SLICK-GLN
    @SLICK-GLN Год назад

    Keep up the great work .Will you be doing a review of the Luchs?

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +1

      No, I don't have that kit

    • @SLICK-GLN
      @SLICK-GLN Год назад

      @@Panzermeister36 thanks for the reply

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +1

      Do they make a Luchs? I thought that was Border Models.

    • @SLICK-GLN
      @SLICK-GLN Год назад

      @@Panzermeister36 you know what your right it's Border Models kit lol Duh.

  • @steviegibson5847
    @steviegibson5847 Год назад +2

    BTW.....I love the Academy PZ III i and StuG IV very much (the buildability is like Tamiya) but the RFM are better! Especially for the same money. The RFM PZ IV was £36 and the RFM PZ III was £30! Thrifty modelling! 😆

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад +1

      I also got this RFM Pz IV for a really good price. Brand new retail price was cheaper than equivalent Dragon kits. Can't say no to that!

    • @steviegibson5847
      @steviegibson5847 Год назад +1

      @@Panzermeister36 there's a new sheriff in town! 😆

  • @davidknights3878
    @davidknights3878 Год назад +1

    You failed to use the Viagra that they included in the kit for the gun to "keep it up"

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад

      Lol, I knew someone would make this joke, didn't expect it to be you 😛

  • @johngjeffery8735
    @johngjeffery8735 Год назад

    Where can you buy Ryefield models in Canada?

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад

      I bought this kit at Wheels and Wings Hobbies in Toronto about one year ago for a good price. My local shop in Ottawa also carries RFM kits.

  • @alvaroortiz9346
    @alvaroortiz9346 10 месяцев назад

    Hay friend. Reyfield is better than Tamiya??

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  10 месяцев назад

      I would personally say yes, though RFM has a lot more parts. Not an insane level of parts, but more than Tamiya. So if you are looking for an easy weekend build, Tamiya would be a better choice.

    • @alvaroortiz9346
      @alvaroortiz9346 10 месяцев назад

      @@Panzermeister36 thank you, im looking for best details

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  10 месяцев назад

      Then go with RFM for sure

  • @Will_14_years_ago
    @Will_14_years_ago Год назад

    The jagdpanther g2 by rfi is currently beating me. I guess im over my head😢

  • @AfsarAli-op6eq
    @AfsarAli-op6eq Год назад +1

    Wow

  • @steriskyline4470
    @steriskyline4470 Год назад

    My grandad told me that sprinking a ground up viagra in your paint will help with floppy gun syndrome 😊

  • @SLICK-GLN
    @SLICK-GLN Год назад

    I would like to see a early PZ IV say a D or E . Like PZ meister I want some early PZ III.

  • @hidalgohouse3815
    @hidalgohouse3815 Год назад +8

    Stop pretending you're busy..post more. thanks.

  • @walshhaddock7255
    @walshhaddock7255 Год назад

    promo sm ✨

  • @CatEatsDogs
    @CatEatsDogs Год назад +1

    I'm using a metall counterweight inside the models. Just gluing some big metall washers with CA.

    • @Panzermeister36
      @Panzermeister36  Год назад

      For the gun barrel?

    • @CatEatsDogs
      @CatEatsDogs Год назад

      @@Panzermeister36 I glue some big metal things to the gun breach. It acts like counterweight. Especially suitable if metal barrel was used. But in my models there always was a bit of tension between the turret and the mantlet with the gun barrel.